[7.1) Introductions Evaluation and Appraisal Review Process Changes in Community Planning Laws Changes to Local Conditions Overall Updates to the Village Comprehensive Plan Updates to Goals, Objectives, Policies by Element (Future Land Use Element, Infrastructure and Water Resource Element, Transportation and Mobility Element, Housing Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Transportation and Mobility Element, Conservation Element) Capital Improvements Element Economic Development Element Property Rights Element Mapping Updates] [00:00:25] THINGS IN PLACE TO SUPPORT THAT DOCUMENT. THERE'S AN ENTIRELY NEW ELEMENT, THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT, AND THAT THAT THAT BEGAN WITH A STUDY THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL DID TO GIVE YOU SOME STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE ELEMENT SPECIFIC DEFINITIONS THAT WE MOVED INTO THE GLOSSARY, AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, AND VERY IMPORTANT AND WHY IT'S IN BOLD IS THERE'S ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT WE ARE MAKING, CONTINUING TO MAKE BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN IN CONSTANT CONTACT WITH FLORIDA COMMERCE. THEY EVEN GAVE US SOME CHANGES THAT, YOU KNOW, AFTER THIS AFTERNOON THAT WE HAD TO PUT INTO PLACE. SO I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT THIS IS NOT THE THE ACTUAL FINAL PLAN. WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE AND YOU MAY HAVE CHANGES THAT YOU WANT TO DIRECT YOUR COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL MAY HAVE CHANGES. SO THAT PLAN IS KIND OF EVOLVING. NEXT NEXT SLIDE. SO AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, I WANT TO GIVE YOU UPDATES. I'M NOT GOING TO COVER EVERY SINGLE POLICY OBVIOUSLY, BUT WE'RE GOING TO GIVE YOU LIKE A SUMMARY BY ELEMENT. WE'RE GOING TO TAKE IT ELEMENT BY ELEMENT. SO AFTER I DO MY OVERVIEW I'LL BE LISTENING TO YOUR YOUR INPUT OR QUESTIONS. AND MY ASSOCIATE HERE IS GOING TO PUT THE ACTUAL LANGUAGE UP ON THE SCREEN SO EVERYBODY CAN SEE WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. AND MY ONLY REQUEST IS IF YOU HAVE A SPECIFIC POLICY THAT YOU HAVE A QUESTION OR A DISCUSSION, PLEASE GIVE ME THE POLICY NUMBER SO THAT MIKE CAN FIND IT. LOCATE IT QUICKLY. BECAUSE IF YOU TELL US WHAT PAGE NUMBER IT'S, IT CAN BECOME HARD FOR US TO MANAGE. SO NEXT SLIDE. SO WE'LL START WITH FUTURE LAND USE AS THE OTHER ELEMENTS. WE REORGANIZED IT THROUGHOUT. THERE WAS A TERM IN THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CALLED URBAN CORE. AND IT IT IS A LITTLE CONFUSING BECAUSE WE HAVE A VILLAGE CORE MIXED USE. SO WE CHANGED THAT URBAN CORE TO VILLAGE CORE MIXED USE, BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT IT WAS INTENDED TO BE. SO IT WAS JUST A REWORDING. WE ALSO AT THE THE ADVICE OF YOUR ATTORNEY, WE PUT A POLICY IN THERE TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ORDERS. IT'S ALREADY IN YOUR LAND DEVELOPMENT, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE IN BOTH PLACES. SO IT'S VERY CLEAR THAT THAT PEOPLE HAVE THEIR EXISTING PROPERTY RIGHTS. WE REMOVE SOME SUSTAINABILITY POLICIES THAT WERE DIFFICULT TO ENFORCE, LIKE HOW DO YOU TRACK THAT? SO WE JUST REMOVED THOSE AND WE ALSO ADDED SOME POLICIES RELATED TO FLOATING SOLAR FACILITIES. SO THAT IS ONE OF THE STATE LAWS THAT THEY WANTED US TO ADDRESS. AND BASICALLY THAT'S PUTTING SOLAR PANELS IN A WATER WATER SOURCE. AND THEY FLOAT AND THEY PROVIDE ENERGY. SOME PEOPLE HAVE USED THOSE IN STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS. YOU CAN USE A LAKE, BUT THERE'S SEVERAL DIFFERENT WAYS. SO WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT USE. AND WE AT THE AFTER THE WORKSHOP, WE ADDED BACK THE INTRO LINES TO THE FUTURE LAND USE. WE CALL THEM TAGLINES, BUT IT IT. ONE OF THE MEMBERS SAID IT WAS EASIER FOR HER TO FOLLOW AND WE THOUGHT THAT MADE SENSE. WE PUT. WE PUT THAT BACK. OH GO BACK. SORRY. OKAY, SO THIS IS WHERE WE TALK ABOUT INDIVIDUAL POLICIES OR QUESTIONS THAT YOU AS A BODY HAVE. AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO DO THAT NOW AND THEN. IF YOU DON'T, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ELEMENT. DOES ANYBODY ON THE PANEL HAVE QUESTIONS? OKAY. SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ELEMENT. THANK YOU. AND AS I MENTIONED, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO SPEAK TO ALL OF THESE. SO TAKE NOTES. IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION ON A SPECIFIC ELEMENT. SO NEXT WE HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE AND WATER RESOURCES. THIS IS TO TALK ABOUT DRINKING WATER POTABLE WATER, SEWER SOLID WASTE, ETC. SO ONE OF THE BIG CHANGES THAT WE HAD IN THIS ELEMENT IS YOU HAVE ACQUIRED THE PRIVATE UTILITY. SO NOW INDIAN TOWN IS THE PROVIDER OF YOUR WATER AND WASTEWATER. WE ALSO HAD TO RECOGNIZE THE WATER SUPPLY PLAN, WHICH I MENTIONED PRIOR. AND WE INCLUDED PROVISIONS FOR TO MAKE SURE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE, WHETHER OR NOT IS. LET ME START OVER. IF INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS [00:05:06] TO BE REPLACED OR IF IT'S NOT FEASIBLE, REPLACED, IF IT'S IF IT'S NOT FEASIBLE TO FIX. WE ALSO HAD SOME ADDITIONAL CHANGES BECAUSE OF SENATE BILL 180. THAT'S THE THING I MENTIONED BEFORE. NEXT SLIDE. SO THAT LOOKS LIKE WHY DID WE STRIKE THAT OUT? WE STRUCK OUT. THE VILLAGE WILL CONTINUE TO MAKE APPROPRIATE CHANGES. AND THE LANGUAGE CHANGES AT ADVICE OF THE STATE, THEY SAID THAT COULD BE CONSTRUED AS MORE RESTRICTIVE OR BURDENSOME. SO WE JUST KEPT IT THAT WE'RE GOING TO ADOPT THE WATER SUPPLY PLAN. BUT WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT PUTTING THE CHANGES IN THERE. OKAY. OH, LET'S GO BACK. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON INFRASTRUCTURE? OKAY. NEXT SLIDE. HOUSING. BASICALLY IT IS WHAT IT IS HISTORIC HISTORIC HOUSING. WE TALK ABOUT THE LOCAL REGISTER. WE ALSO CLARIFIED SOME OF THE POLICIES RELATED TO GREEN BUILDINGS TO MAKE IT BROAD. YOU KNOW, THERE'S DIFFERENT AGENCIES WHO CERTIFY GREEN BUILDINGS. WE ALSO UPDATED REFERENCE RELATED TO FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. AND WE TALKED ABOUT SUBSTANDARD VERSUS DILAPIDATED HOUSING. AND THE DIFFERENCE IS SUBSTANDARD IS SOMETHING THAT'S FEASIBLE TO REPAIR. DILAPIDATED IS A HOUSE, A HOUSE THAT REALLY NEEDS TO BE DEMOLISHED BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO COST MORE TO FIX IT THAN IT'S WORTH. AND THEN WE HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL CHANGES FROM SENATE BILL 180. NEXT SLIDE. SO THIS IS VERY DETAIL ORIENTED. AGAIN, IT CAME FROM THE STATE. THEY WANTED US TO BE VERY SPECIFIC ABOUT WHICH VERSION OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WE'RE USING. AND WE TOOK OUT THE WORD AS AMENDED. THEY DIDN'T THINK THAT WAS A GOOD WORD TO USE. AND AGAIN, SOME OF THESE SOUND VERY PICKY, BUT THAT IS HOW STATEWIDE THEY'RE LOOKING AT COMPREHENSIVE PLANS. ONE WORD CAN THROW IT OUT. NEXT CHANGE OUR NEXT SLIDE. RECREATION. OPEN SPACE IS EXACTLY WHAT IT SEEMS IT IS. PROVISION TO FOR PARKS ET-CETERA. SO THINGS THAT HAPPEN LOCALLY. SINCE THE INAUGURAL PLAN, YOU ADOPTED A PARKS MASTER PLAN. SO WE NOW REFERENCE THAT YOU ALSO HAVE A PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. WE ADDED THAT. WE CLARIFIED WHAT RECREATION SPACE IS. AND BASICALLY IT'S SO THAT IT REALLY TALKS ABOUT PASSIVE AND ACTIVE PARKS, NOT JUST OPEN SPACE. SO WE JUST CHANGED THAT IN THE GLOSSARY TO MAKE IT CLEARER. AND WE TALKED ABOUT A DIFFERENT KIND OF LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS. MIKE, DO YOU WANT TO JUMP IN THERE? SO THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVIDES FOR TWO SEPARATE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS, MEANING WHEN YOU'RE REVIEWING POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, DO WE HAVE ADEQUATE FACILITIES TO SUPPORT THAT DEVELOPMENT. AND SO FOR PARKS, THERE IS A PARK STANDARD THAT YOU NEED A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF ACREAGE PER 1000 RESIDENTS. THERE'S ALSO THE SECONDARY LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT WAS ALREADY NOT ENFORCEABLE. IT WAS JUST AN ADVISORY LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR WHAT BONNIE MENTIONED, OUR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS, THEY WEREN'T VERY CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE VILLAGE. AND ESSENTIALLY THEY SPEAK TO JUST LARGE, MOSTLY STATE OWNED OR EVEN FEDERALLY OWNED CONSERVATION AREA. THERE WAS NO DEFINITION ABOUT HOW FAR THE VILLAGE WOULD LOOK OUT TO SEE IF THERE WAS SUFFICIENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREA. THERE ARE NONE WITHIN THE VILLAGE, AND THERE ARE NONE OWNED BY OR MANAGED BY THE VILLAGE. SO FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS, THERE WAS NO REAL WAY FOR THE VILLAGE STAFF OR THE PUBLIC REALLY TO SAY HOW MUCH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREA DO WE HAVE TO SUPPORT THIS DEVELOPMENT? SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING REMOVING THAT STANDARD ALTOGETHER BECAUSE IT'S COMPLETELY VAGUE AND ARBITRARY AND UNENFORCEABLE. BUT YOU STILL HAVE YOUR PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD. YEAH, AND THAT'S THE OTHER THING. THE STATE WANTS EVERYTHING TO BE ABLE TO DEFINE IT, MEANING IT NEEDS TO BE VERY SPECIFIC. SO ANYTHING THAT'S NOT CLEAR, WE EITHER REVISE IT OR WE TAKE IT OUT. NEXT SLIDE. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION. THIS IS YOUR MUNICIPAL PARTNERS. THIS IS LIKE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. THIS IS LIKE THE COUNTY. AND BASICALLY IT TALKS ABOUT OUR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS WITH OUR PARTNERS. WE UPDATED THE SCHOOL IMPACT REVIEW TO BE CURRENT WITH YOUR JOINT. I, A INTERGOVERNMENTAL. WAIT, MIKE, I'LL INTER-LOCAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. THANK YOU. WE [00:10:04] SHOULDN'T HAVE PUT THAT ACRONYM IN THERE. WE ALSO TALKED ABOUT THE WATER SUPPLY PLAN AGAIN, MOBILITY PLAN. WHEN YOU ADOPTED THAT, IT IT AFFECTED MORE THAN JUST TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. AND WE UPDATED REFERENCES TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES. AND AGAIN, WE HAD ADDITIONAL CHANGES BECAUSE OF SENATE BILL 180 THAT WE JUST MADE. NEXT SLIDE. SO WE TALKED ABOUT SPECIFICS. SO IN YOUR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH FOR SCHOOL PLANNING, THEY WANTED TO PUT THE DATE IN THERE. SAME WITH YOUR INTERLOCAL FOR COLLECTION OF IMPACT FEES. AND ALSO THERE WAS A SCRIVENER'S ERROR WHERE WE SEE THE VILLAGE SHALL COORDINATE WITH MARTIN GALLERY. OH, THEY WANTED US TO TAKE THAT OUT. THE NEW DEVELOPMENT AND CONNECTIONS, BECAUSE IT COULD BE CONSIDERED MORE BURDENSOME BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NEW DEVELOPMENT CONNECTIONS. SO THEY SAID, JUST TAKE OUT THOSE THREE WORDS AGAIN. THAT WAS A SENATE BILL 180 CHANGE. NEXT SLIDE. OH I'M SORRY. THANK YOU MIKE. I AM RUSHING THROUGH IT. DID YOU DO WE NEED TO GO BACK TO THE OTHER ELEMENTS? I DIDN'T MEAN TO SKIP OVER YOUR ABILITY TO. ARE WE GOOD? I'M GOOD. OKAY. I DON'T MEAN TO RACE THROUGH IT, BUT WHEN WE DID IT, IT WAS LIKE 3.5 HOURS ON SATURDAY. SO I'M TRYING TO GET THROUGH IT. BUT IF IF IF I FORGET TO ASK, PLEASE INTERRUPT ME BECAUSE WE IT IS EASIER TO COVER IT WHILE WE'RE ON EACH ELEMENT BECAUSE MIKE'S TRACKING IT. SO TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY MIGHT GO BACK. OKAY, SORRY. SO AGAIN, I KNOW I KEEP SAYING THE MOBILITY PLAN, BUT WE DID HAVE TO ADD AN OBJECTIVE AND MANY POLICIES TO SUPPORT YOUR MOBILITY PLAN AND YOUR MOBILITY FEE. WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE ON STREET PARKING WITHIN THE VILLAGE CORE, WHICH IS WHERE YOU WOULD WANT TO SEE THAT. AND WE ADDED A POLICY FOR COORDINATION. THIS ONE CAME FROM SATURDAY'S WORKSHOP. ONE OF THE MEMBERS WANTED US TO MENTION A FUTURE TRAIN STATION. SO WE ADDED A POLICY AND TRANSPORTATION TO SAY HOPEFULLY DOWN THE FUTURE, YOU WILL HAVE A TRAIN STATION. AND AGAIN, WE HAD ADDITIONAL CHANGES FOR SENATE BILL 180. NEXT SLIDE. SO THEY BASICALLY REDUCED THE THE WORDS THAT WE HAD. AND I THINK, OH, SO THE REASON WHY THEY CHANGED THIS, THE WAY WE HAD REWORDED IT, IT LOOKED LIKE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT STREETS NOT OWNED BY THE VILLAGE. AND THEY WANTED US TO NARROW THE FOCUS JUST TO THE STREETS THAT THE VILLAGE CAN HAS THE CONTROL OVER. AND SO ANY, IF WE CAN'T REALLY SAY WHAT FDOT IS GOING TO DO, WE CAN ONLY SAY WHAT WE CAN DO ON OUR STREETS. SO THEY WANTED US TO JUST KEEP IT STRAIGHT. SO THIS PARTICULAR CHANGE CAME TODAY. LITERALLY, WE SENT THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION, AND THEY SENT US BACK SEVERAL CHANGES THAT WE HAVE ALREADY PUT IN THERE. BUT DON'T APPEAR IN YOUR PACKET BECAUSE IT HAPPENED AT 1230 TODAY. NEXT SLIDE. ANYBODY HAVE QUESTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION? LOOKS LIKE. IS IT? OH I'M SORRY, I'M SORRY. THANK YOU. THIS PARTICULAR CHANGE WAS AGAIN RELATED TO JUST MAINTAINING AND CONSTRUCTING VILLAGE STREETS. THEY WANTED US TO TAKE OUT THE OTHER LANGUAGE SO THAT IT DIDN'T APPEAR LIKE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT STATE OWNED ROADS. NEXT SLIDE. THIS WAS A SCRIVENER'S ERROR. WE HAD COUNTY IN THERE TWICE, SO IT'S A GOOD TIME TO FIX IT. BUT THIS WAS NOT A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE. THIS PARTICULAR CHANGE WAS INTERESTING. WE WANTED TO TALK. YOU KNOW MANY TIMES YOU TALK ABOUT ALTERNATIVE MODES OF TRANSPORTATION. AND TYPICALLY BICYCLE AND PED GOES TOGETHER, BUT BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN WALKERS AND BIKERS. SO WE WANTED TO ADD THE WORD BICYCLE TRAFFIC. AND FDOT SAID NO, BECAUSE IT WASN'T IN THERE BEFORE AND IT COULD GET THROWN OUT JUST BY ADDING THAT WORD. SO WE TOOK THE WORD OUT. THE VILLAGE WILL IMPROVE SAFETY, PROMOTING SIGN AND MARKING. AGAIN. THEY WANT US TO CHANGE THE WAY IT WAS WORDED, SO THAT IT WAS CLEAR THAT THE VILLAGE WOULD BE DOING THE MARKING OF BIKE LANES AND CLEARLY DELINEATING THE ROAD, BECAUSE WE CAN'T WE CAN'T SAY THAT FDOT IS GOING TO DO IT BECAUSE IT'S OUR ROADS. SO THEY JUST WANTED US TO FOCUS ON THE ROADS THAT [00:15:01] WE HAVE CONTROL OVER. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION? OKAY. NEXT SLIDE. CONSERVATION ELEMENT. IT IS EXACTLY WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. THIS IS CONSERVATION. THIS IS POLLUTION OR TRYING TO NOT HAVE POLLUTION. SEPTIC TANKS, ETC. SO SOME OF THE THINGS WE UPDATED, THERE'S NEW FEDERAL STANDARDS RELATED TO AIR QUALITY THAT WE ADDED. THERE WERE SOME STATE CLASSIFICATIONS OF ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES THAT HAD TO BE UPDATED. THERE WAS A POLICY ABOUT A STATEWIDE RECYCLING GOAL. AND I THINK THAT WAS IN 2020. SO OBVIOUSLY THAT WAS OUTDATED. SO WE TOOK THAT OUT. THERE'S NO LONGER A STATEWIDE SPECIFIC GOAL FOR RECYCLING. AND WE TALKED ABOUT NEW POLICIES RELATED TO GREEN BUILDINGS AND SUSTAINABILITY. AND WITH THE GREEN BUILDINGS, WE GAVE IT A BROADER PAINTBRUSH, MEANING THERE'S SEVERAL DIFFERENT CERTIFICATIONS YOU CAN GET FOR GREEN BUILDING, NOT JUST ONE. SO WE, WE MADE IT MORE BROAD SO THAT WE CAN ENCOURAGE GREEN BUILDINGS. AND DOES ANYBODY HAVE WE DON'T HAVE ANY MORE ON THAT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON CONSERVATION. NEXT SLIDE. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT. THAT'S BASICALLY YOUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. IT'S ALSO A REQUIRED ELEMENT. WE UPDATED TO RECOGNIZE YOUR MOBILITY PLAN. AND WE TRIED TO STREAMLINE IT SO THAT THE YOUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN IS AN APPENDIX TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT. TO MAKE IT EASIER TO UPDATE. YOU DON'T HAVE TO UPDATE YOUR PLAN EVERY EVERY YEAR WHEN YOU DO YOUR CIP. NEXT SLIDE. AND OUR NEW ELEMENT, THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT. AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, IT IS NOT A REQUIRED ELEMENT. IT'S AN OPTIONAL ELEMENT THAT THE VILLAGE WOULD LIKE TO ADD. THIS WAS A RESULT OF A COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY THAT WAS FACILITATED BY THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. AND THEY IN THAT PLAN, THEY PROVIDED THE DATA FOR THAT ELEMENT, AND THEY ALSO GAVE US A BASIS OF POLICIES THAT WE CREATED TO TO MAKE UP THAT NEW ELEMENT. NEXT SLIDE. PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT. THAT WAS A REQUIREMENT AS OF I THINK, 2023, THAT ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HAD TO ADD TO THEIR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THIS IS THE LEAST AMOUNT OF CREATIVITY POSSIBLE WHERE THE STATE WAS RECOMMENDING THAT WE LITERALLY TAKE THE LAW, THOSE FOUR THINGS, AND PUT IT IN THE PLAN AND DON'T CHANGE IT. SO WE'RE NOT CHANGING IT BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THIS IS THE BAD TIME TO DO THAT. BUT THAT WAS VERY PRESCRIBED BY THE STATE, WHAT IT NEEDED TO HAVE IN IT. NEXT SLIDE. AND THEN AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, WE HAD CONSOLIDATED ALL THE ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS INTO A GLOSSARY SECTION. AND AS REQUIRED, WE ADDED DEFINITIONS FOR THE FLOATING SOLAR, AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, AND RESILIENCY FOR FACILITIES. NEXT SLIDE. YOU HAVE A SERIES OF MAPS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY STATUTE. WE HAD TO CREATE FUTURE LAND USE FOR 2050, WHICH IS OUR PLANNING LONG RANGE PLAN. WE HAD TO UPDATE IT FOR THE ANNEXED PROPERTIES THAT YOU ADDED TO THE VILLAGE. WE HAD TO CREATE SOME ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA MAPS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY STATE. WE HAD TO UPDATE THE THE ROADWAY SYSTEM, AND WE HAD TO UPDATE ALTERNATIVE MODES OF TRANSPORTATION. AND AGAIN, THE MAPS, WHAT WHAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE IN THE WAY OF MAPS IS GOVERNED BY THE STATE. WE JUST HAVE TO ADD THOSE. NEXT SLIDE. SO I I'LL LEAVE IT TO THE CHAIR TO, TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY MEMBERS OF THE PANEL THAT HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. AND THEN WE WILL LOOK FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. AND I CAN MENTION THAT ONCE YOU'RE DONE. DOES ANY OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I THINK WE SHOULD DO PUBLIC COMMENT AND OKAY, WE CAN COLLABORATE WITH PUBLIC COMMENT. YEAH. AND AGAIN, IF YOU IF YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE A SPECIFIC QUESTION ABOUT A SPECIFIC POLICY, IT'S VERY HELPFUL TO US. IF YOU COULD GIVE US THE POLICY NUMBER THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, OR IF IT'S A GENERAL COMMENT, WE DON'T NEED THAT. AND CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, THAT EACH PERSON HAS THREE MINUTES, CORRECT? YES. OKAY. THREE MINUTES. WE JUST HAVE ONE CHAIR. ERIC MILLER. I'LL TRY AND BE BRIEF. AT LEAST THREE MINUTES WORTH. THIS THING SEEMS TO BE A DEATH BY A THOUSAND [00:20:05] CUTS. AND WE HAVE PROVIDED, FOR THE RECORD, A GAP ANALYSIS. OUR GAP ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT THIS HAS GONE FROM LANGUAGE THAT PROVIDES FOR A RURAL CHARACTER AND LIFESTYLE TO BE HELD AS YOUR COMPREHENSIVE MAIN PLAN INTO A MORE URBANIZED AND INDUSTRIAL PLAN. THERE ARE MULTIPLE AREAS. WE'VE POINTED THIS OUT THE NUMBER OF TIMES RURAL HAS BEEN REMOVED. THE WORD SMALL IN FRONT OF A HOTEL HAS BEEN REMOVED. CITIZEN HAS BEEN REPLACED WITH RESIDENT WORDS HAVE MEANING. WORDS HAVE MEANING. IT'S NOT JUST WE ARBITRARILY CHANGE WORDS. WHY DID WE GO FROM CITIZEN TO RESIDENT? OKAY, I KNOW POTABLE WATER. YOU'RE AT THE MINIMUM STANDARDS. I KNOW THERE'S SOME TESTING TAKING PLACE RIGHT NOW. THE RESULTS THAT ARE COMING BACK IN ARE NOT LOOKING GOOD. WE MAY WANT TO RAISE THE BAR ON A FEW THINGS, INCLUDING POTABLE WATER, SOMETHING WE DRINK. THIS PLANT IS COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND HAS VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH THE PEOPLE IT'S SUPPOSED TO SERVE. THE PEOPLE OF THE VILLAGE. THERE'S NOTHING IN HERE FOR FOOD SECURITY IN AN ECONOMICALLY UNCERTAIN TIME, IN A RURAL AGRICULTURE. WELL, WE'RE NOT EVEN RURAL ANYMORE. WE'RE NOW IN INDUSTRIAL. SO I GUESS THAT DOESN'T APPLY. NEITHER DO USDA LOANS ANYMORE. BY THE WAY, FOR ALL OF YOU REALTORS AND PEOPLE THAT ARE LOOKING FOR SOME HELP THERE, IT'S 100% DEVELOPMENT FRIENDLY. THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, YOU MIGHT AS WELL GIVE IT TO THE ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF INDIAN TOWN. YOU'RE COMPLETELY OUT OF YOUR CONTROL. ONCE YOU TURN OVER YOUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO SOMEONE ELSE, LIKE A PLANNING COUNCIL, YOUR ELECTED PEOPLE HAVE NO MORE CONTROL BECAUSE OF THE INFLUENCE THAT COMES FROM IT. THE FS 180, THE SB 484. I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THAT YOU SAID ABOUT FS 180. YOU CANNOT MAKE ANYTHING MORE RESTRICTIVE, BUT HOW CAN YOU RESTRICT SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXIST? AND WHEN SB 484 GIVES YOU CLEAR, EXPLICIT AUTHORITY TO CREATE NOW RULES AND GUIDELINES FOR LARGE LOAD CUSTOMERS WHICH HAVE NEVER EXISTED BEFORE AND HAVE GIVEN YOU EXPLICIT AUTHORITY TO DO JUST THAT TASK. WHY IS THAT NOT BEING ADDRESSED AND READY TO PUT ON THE PLATE? A LOT OF THESE CHANGES WE WANT MADE WOULD REQUIRE YOU TO REDO THIS. IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. YOU'RE CONVENIENTLY UP AGAINST A DEADLINE. THIS SHOULD HAVE STARTED A LONG TIME AGO SO THAT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES COULD HAVE TAKEN PLACE. BUT AGAIN, HERE WE ARE. SO I APPRECIATE YOU ALL BEING HERE AND THINKING YOU'RE DOING SOMETHING GOOD. THANK YOU. THAT'S IT CHAIR. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. YEP. SORRY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS. YOU ALWAYS HAVE A COMMENT. SUSAN I'M SORRY. AND JUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE THE PC. AB WE DID AFTER WE HAVE YOUR FINAL COMMENTS, WE HAVE A SUGGESTED MOTION TO MAKE SURE THAT IN YOUR MOTION, IT WOULD ALSO APPLY TO ANY MORE INPUT WE GET FROM THE STATE. AS I SAID, IT CHANGED AT NOON TODAY. IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO CHANGE AGAIN, UNFORTUNATELY, BECAUSE WE'RE STILL WAITING TO HEAR ABOUT SOME CHANGES FROM WILL TO SHALL FROM THEIR THEIR ATTORNEY. SO JUST MAKE SURE YOU ALLOW FOR US TO CHANGE IT AS WE GO, AS WE GET INPUT BACK FROM THE STATE. SO, SO THERE ARE TWO THINGS THAT HISTORICALLY, STAFF REALIZES THAT ARE MY CONCERNS. AND NUMBER ONE, WE DON'T HAVE AGRICULTURE IN INDIANTOWN ANYMORE. THAT ZONE, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THAT. AND THAT THAT DISTURBS ME. AND ALSO. THE LAST MEETING OR THE MEETING BEFORE I KNOW THAT. WE I GOT IN A DISCUSSION WITH MR. VOSS ABOUT DEFINITIONS ON, ON LARGE LOAD OR HYPERSCALE. AND SO IT'S JUST. THAT IT CONCERNS ME THAT WE DO NOT HAVE SOMETHING THAT ADDRESSES THE LARGE LOAD CUSTOMER WE LIKE WAS MENTIONED. WE WE HAVE WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING THAT COVERS THAT. SO HOW CAN WE MAKE SOMETHING MORE STRICT ON SOMETHING THAT WE DON'T EVEN HAVE? SO I KIND OF, I KIND OF AGREE WITH THAT ONE. SO THOSE ARE, THOSE ARE MY COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I HATE TO SEE AGRICULTURE GO BY THE WAYSIDE AND THAT RURAL FEEL GO BY THE WAYSIDE, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT MYSELF AND, AND CHAIR [00:25:07] WILLIAMSON, WE LIVE IN THE ONLY LITTLE PIECE OF RURAL RESIDENTIAL THAT INDIANTOWN HAS. SO I HATE TO SEE THAT DISAPPEAR. I DID HAVE A QUESTION ON. CHAIR. COULD YOU PULL THAT MIC A LITTLE CLOSER? YEAH. SORRY, GUYS, I DID HAVE A COMMENT ON THE POTABLE WATER. I KNOW WE'RE WORKING ON THE PLANT AND I SEE THOSE GUYS OUT THERE WORKING EVERY DAY COVERED IN DIRT. AND I KNOW THEY'RE MAKING HEADWAY. SO I JUST WANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE WATER SITUATION IS EVENTUALLY GOING TO BE THE BEST WATER IN THE COUNTY, IF NOT THE STATE. BUT WE JUST GOT TO GIVE THEM TIME TO GET THERE. ADDITIONALLY, LIKE SUSAN SAID, THE RURAL ASPECTS OF OUR COMMUNITY ARE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. THERE WERE SOME LANGUAGE THERE THAT I NOTICED THAT SAYS EVEN WITH THE COUNTY OUTLYING RURAL, RURAL AG PROPERTIES, THE VILLAGE IS GOING TO BE TAKING AN INTEREST IN RESERVING THOSE OR TRYING TO KEEP THOSE AG LANDS. AG I CAN'T TELL YOU ON WHAT 110. OH YES, THERE WE ARE. AG LAND PRESERVATION. THAT I THINK IS AN IMPORTANT PROVISION TO HAVE HERE. I THINK THAT'S IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT DUE TO THE SB 180 CURRENTLY ISN'T THE TIME, BUT IT APPEARS THAT IN OCTOBER, THOSE IN OCTOBER, IT APPEARS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO MAKE SOME HEADWAY WITH THOSE 2027 2027. SO. CORRECT. YEAH. SO I THINK THAT'S THINGS THAT WE NEED TO ALL TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION. WE SHOULD WRITE DOWN ALL THESE QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS AND MAKE A LIST. AND THESE COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND TOWN HALLS THAT WE'RE HAVING ARE SO VITAL. THE TOWN HALLS THAT THEY HAD IN NOVEMBER AND OCTOBER, THERE, THERE'S BEEN TOWN HALLS, YOU KNOW, AND SO. IF IF I COULD COMMENT ON THAT, AND I THINK WAYNE, I THINK WADE EXPLAINED THE GIST OF THE SITUATION. YOU KNOW, IF YOU BRING AGRICULTURAL LAND INTO THE VILLAGE, IT'S PROBABLY MORE EXPENSIVE FOR THEM TO EXIST INSIDE THE VILLAGE BOUNDARY THAN IT DOES FOR THEM TO EXIST IN THE COUNTY. SO WITH THAT SAID, YOU KNOW, THE STATE PASSED AGRITOURISM LEGISLATION A FEW YEARS AGO, MAYBE TEN YEARS AGO BY NOW. AND YOU SEE SOME OF THE RESULTS OF THAT. THERE HAVE BEEN SOME GOOD THINGS THAT HAPPEN. YOU KNOW, FARMS, THERE'S BEEN WHAT'S THE PLACE NEXT TO 95? THEY BUILT ALL THE OH, GEEZ. WHAT'S THE NAME OF THAT? YEAH. HOPE SOUND FARMERS MARKET. SO THAT'S THOSE SORT OF THINGS ALLOW AGRICULTURAL TO DO MORE THAN JUST GROW VEGETABLES. THEY OBVIOUSLY HAVE. YOU CAN BRING OTHER ELEMENTS INTO INTO THE PROPERTY UNDER THE AGRITOURISM BILL. BUT IF INDIANTOWN WANTS TO ATTRACT AGRICULTURE INSIDE OUR BOUNDARY, ARE WE ANNEX AGRICULTURE INSIDE OUR BOUNDARY. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO INCENTIVIZE THAT BECAUSE I WOULDN'T IF I OWNED AGRICULTURAL LAND, I WOULDN'T JOIN INTO THE VILLAGE. MY TAX RATE WOULD SIMPLY GO UP. SO WHY? WHY IN GOD'S NAME WOULD I DO THAT? SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, THE MATH HAS TO MAKE SENSE FOR ANY OF THAT TO HAPPEN. AND I'M NOT AGAINST THAT. I'M JUST SAYING THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO ATTRACT AGRICULTURAL INTO OUR BOUNDARY, THEN WE NEED TO SOMEHOW INCENTIVIZE THAT IN THE FUTURE. THAT WOULD BE THAT WOULD BE MY TAKE ON THAT, BECAUSE I WOULD SEE NO OTHER REASON TO WANT TO JOIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN ABOUT AGRICULTURAL LAND, UNLESS THERE WAS SOME BENEFIT FOR ME TO DO SO. SO, AND TO THE CHAIR'S POINT, WE ARE MAKING A LIST OF POLICIES THAT WE HAD TO CHANGE, THAT WE'D LIKE TO PUT BACK IN. SO THEY'RE THEY'RE WHAT WE CALL THEM IS THEIR SHELF. SO THEY'RE WRITTEN AND THEY'RE ON A SHELF. BUT IN OCTOBER 2027, YOU CAN UPDATE YOUR PLAN AND ADD THOSE POLICIES UNLESS THERE'S ANOTHER HURRICANE, BECAUSE THEN YOU'RE ON, YOU'RE BACK IN THE THE ONE YEAR MARK. IT'S IT'S EVERY YEAR. SO AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS, HOWEVER, ARE WE DOING THE SHELF THING WITH OUR ELDERS? JUST QUESTION. YEAH. DEENA FREEMAN, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, THE ELDERS, WE CAN DRAFT THEM. WE CAN WE WE CAN MAKE THEM. WE CAN'T MAKE THEM STRICTER RIGHT NOW UNTIL OCTOBER 1ST, 2027. BUT WE CAN DRAFT THEM. THAT'S [00:30:02] ALL WE CAN DO. I CANNOT MAKE ANY ACTION. WE CANNOT MAKE ANYTHING RESTRICTIVE AND BURDENSOME. BUT AS LONG AS WE ARE. MY THING IS, AS LONG AS YEAH, WE WAIT UNTIL THAT POINT. BUT AS LONG AS WE ARE MAKING THEM, PUTTING THEM ON THE SHELF. SO WHEN THAT DAY COMES, THEN WE'RE ABLE TO MOVE. THAT'S AND AND YOU ARE REQUIRED TO UPDATE YOUR ELDERS WITHIN ONE YEAR OF YOUR COMP PLAN. AND HOW WE'VE HANDLED IT WITH OTHER CLIENTS IS WE'VE, WE'VE DRAFTED THEM, LIKE DANA SAID, WE'VE DONE IT WITHIN A YEAR, BUT WE REALLY CAN'T. I MEAN, WE'RE KIND OF IN A PLACE WHERE WE'RE SUPPOSED TO UPDATE THEM, BUT WE REALLY CAN'T. BUT WELL, WE CAN SHARE THEM. WITH REGARD TO THE UPDATES THAT YOU'RE REQUIRED TO DO WITHIN ONE YEAR. AFTER A YEAR, YES. THOSE WOULD JUST BE UPDATES TO IMPLEMENT CHANGES THAT ARE BEING DONE. THIS COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. THAT'S TRUE. YOU CAN DO OTHER LDR AMENDMENTS OUTSIDE THE WINDOW BEYOND OCTOBER 1ST, 2027. YEAH. SO WE'LL WE'LL DO THE UPDATE. WE'LL SHELVE SOME OF THE THE REGULATIONS, BUT WE DO NEED TO UPDATE YOUR LDR. WE JUST HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL WITH WHAT WE CHANGE UNTIL OCTOBER 2027. YOU KNOW, IF I COULD THINKING ONCE AGAIN ABOUT HOW TO INCENTIVIZE TO GET AGRICULTURE INSIDE OUR BOUNDARY, GOING BACK TO AND CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, DANA, BECAUSE YOU PROBABLY REMEMBER WHAT I DID. BUT BUT PINEWOOD PRAIRIE, THAT KNIGHT KIPLINGER BROUGHT IN TO, YOU KNOW, I FORGET HOW MANY ACRES THAT WAS, BUT QUITE A LARGE PARCEL. BUT SOME OF THAT IS AGRICULTURE. SOME OF THAT IS, YOU KNOW, HAS BIG OPEN SPACES. THEY CONDENSE THE THE HOUSING INTO A SMALLER AREA BECAUSE YOUNG PEOPLE DON'T WANT BIG LOTS AND HAVE TO CUT GRASS AND ALL THIS OTHER STUFF. SO THEY HAVE MUCH MORE OPEN SPACE. BUT PART OF THAT IS AGRICULTURE. SO MAYBE AS TIME GOES ON, WE THINK ABOUT HOW TO ENCOURAGE DEVELOPERS THAT MAY COME IN TO, YOU KNOW, COME IN TO ANNEX THAT X AMOUNT OF THE PROPERTY IS SET ASIDE FOR AGRICULTURAL USE. I MEAN, THAT'S SOME WAY TO DO THAT. AND I SAW I SAW THAT IN THE PINEWOOD PRAIRIE PROJECT. SO I WAS JUST A THOUGHT. I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IS CORRECT. YEAH. THEY THEY PRESERVED QUITE A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF LAND. AND SOME OF THAT IS LIKE A RURAL DIVERSIFICATION, YOU KNOW, SMALL FARM TO TABLE KIND OF USE. WELL, GOING TO THE FOOD SECURITY ISSUE THAT ERIC BROUGHT UP, THAT WOULD BE ONE WAY TO POSSIBLY HAVE, YOU KNOW, IF YOU HAVE FARMS THAT ARE BUILT INTO THE COMMUNITIES, THAT WOULD BE A THOUGHT. SO MAYBE WE OUGHT TO WORK ON SOME WAY TO INCENTIVIZE THAT SORT OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE FUTURE. I HAVE SAID FOR A LONG TIME THAT 1.25 ACRE PARCELS WOULD BE PROBABLY VERY POPULAR, BECAUSE PEOPLE WANT TO HAVE A PLACE TO HAVE THEIR OWN GARDENS, THEY WANT TO HAVE CHICKENS, THEY WANT TO HAVE ANIMALS, THEY WANT TO HAVE A PLACE TO PARK THEIR TRAILERS. IF THEY HAVE A BOAT, THEY DON'T WANT TO GET TICKETED FOR THAT IN, YOU KNOW, A MORE URBANIZED SETTING. AND SO I THINK THAT TYPE OF COMMUNITY IS WHAT WE ALL WOULD LIKE TO SEE HERE. AND I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE SOMETHING LIKE THAT. I COULD GET BEHIND THAT. AND CURRENTLY IN OUR ELDERS, THE ONLY WAY YOU'RE ABLE TO HAVE THOSE THINGS IS IN A THAT RURAL RESIDENTIAL. THAT'S THE ONLY THE ZONING THAT IT WOULD APPLY TO, FROM WHAT I'M AWARE. ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IS THERE A MOTION THAT YOU GUYS WANT TO PUT TO. OH, IS THAT IT? OKAY. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THERE WAS A MOTION THAT YOU WOULD SUGGEST. IT'S UP HERE. OH RIGHT THERE. OKAY. SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, I'LL MOVE FOR STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL AS WRITTEN ON THE SCREEN. OR DO I NEED TO READ IT OUT? THAT'S A QUESTION FOR AS WRITTEN, AS WRITTEN ON THE SCREEN IS PERFECTLY FINE. OKAY. IT'S WRITTEN ON THE SCREEN THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED BY THE CLERK. I HAVE A MOTION. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I HAVE A SECOND, I HAVE A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. ANY OPPOSED? IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE TO DISCUSS, THIS MEETING IS * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.