[00:00:01]
          LIKE LITERALLY GOT EVERYTHING. TESTING. I LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. GIVE YOUR 
          [1) CALL TO ORDER]
CLERK ONE SECOND. SHE'S GOT TO WRITE IT DOWN. I CAN'T RIGHT NOW. CHAIR. MILLIE, BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS HERE. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON HERE. BOARD MEMBER. GIBBS. THOMAS HERE. 
          BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMSON HERE. JUST FOR THE RECORD, BOARD MEMBER THOMPSON AND BOARD MEMBER WOODY ARE NOT PRESENT. INVOCATION. PLEASE. OUR FATHER, GOD IN HEAVEN, WE COME NOW AT THE CLOSE OF ANOTHER DAY. I THANK YOU, HEAVENLY FATHER, FOR ALLOWING US TO BE IN THIS DAY AND LET THE WORDS OF OUR MOUTH AND THE MEDITATION OF OUR HEARTS BE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SIGHT, OH LORD, OUR STRENGTH AND OUR REDEEMER. AND LET EVERYONE, HEAVENLY FATHER, BE PERSUADED BY THEIR OWN OPINIONS. IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS WE PRAY. AMEN. AMEN. AMEN. PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. DO WE HAVE AN APPROVAL OF THE 
          [5) APPROVAL OF AGENDA]
AGENDA? MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. SO MOVED. I'M SORRY. I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY 
          [6) APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
AYE. AYE. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR PKB PKB. JUNE 5TH, 2020 FIVE MINUTES AS WELL AS JANUARY 7TH, 2020 SIX MINUTES. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. SO MOVED. I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY 
          [7.1) ORDINANCE NO. 03-2026 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE VILLAGE ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TOTALING 5,722.30 +/- ACRES IN SIZE, LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF SW KANNER HIGHWAY AND WEST OF SW WARFIELD BLVD, TO THE VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION; APPROVING THE “TESORO GROVES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING AGREEMENT” AND INCORPORATED MASTER SITE PLAN; AND PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS, SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS, CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
 
APPLICATION NO: SP-26-005 AND RZ-26-002]
AYE. I. ONTO OUR REGULAR AGENDA. AT THIS TIME, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO MR. WADE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM CHAIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. BECAUSE THIS ITEM IS A QUASI JUDICIAL ITEM. I'M GOING TO BE GOING THROUGH THE QUASI JUDICIAL SPEECH THAT WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY'S APPRIZED OF HOW THIS HEARING IS GOING TO GO. AND SO THIS IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC AS WELL AS THE MEMBERS OF THE PCAOB. THIS NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR REVIEW OF TWO APPLICATIONS. APPLICATION NUMBER SP 26 005 AND R Z 20 6-002. THEY ARE REQUESTING A NUMBER OF MATTERS, BEST REPRESENTED BY THE ORDINANCE TITLE THAT IS BEFORE THEM. THIS IS AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA AMENDING THE VILLAGE ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TOTALING 5,722.30 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES IN SIZE. 
          LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF SOUTHWEST CANTER HIGHWAY AND WEST OF SOUTHWEST WARFIELD BOULEVARD TO THE VILLAGE. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION APPROVING THE TESORO GROVES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING AGREEMENT AND INCORPORATED MASTER SITE PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS, SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS, CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AT THIS TIME, IF ANY INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT OR ANY OF THE APPLICANTS FOLKS HERE WITH THEM, STAFF OR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO PLAN TO SPEAK OR OFFER TESTIMONY DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING TONIGHT, I WOULD ASK YOU TO PLEASE RISE AND BE SWORN BY THE VILLAGE CLERK. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE? IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THE APPLICATION. 
          WHAT'S THAT? IN JUST A SECOND. YEAH. THE APPLICATION THAT'S BEFORE THE PCAB TONIGHT IS QUASI JUDICIAL IN NATURE, WHICH REQUIRES THIS PUBLIC HEARING TO COMPLY WITH PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED IN FLORIDA LAW. QUASI JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE LESS FORMAL THAN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A CIRCUIT COURT, BUT ARE MORE FORMAL THAN OUR NORMAL PCAB MEETING ACTION ITEMS AND MUST FOLLOW BASIC STANDARDS OF NOTICE AND DUE PROCESS. THE BOARD'S DECISION TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM MUST BE MADE BASED ON COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. 
          PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL, FACT BASED TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE WILL BE AND MAY BE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD IN ITS DELIBERATION AND VOTING ON THIS ITEM. PURE SPECULATION OR MERE OPINION NOT BASED ON COMPETENT FACTS, CANNOT BE LEGALLY CONSIDERED BY 
          [00:05:04]
THE BOARD IN WEIGHING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE APPLICATION TESTIMONY WITH FACT BASED SUPPORT SUCH AS MINUTES, SURVEYS, ENGINEERING REPORTS AND THE LIKE MAY BE CONSIDERED COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IF YOU INTEND TO SPEAK. PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND WHEN YOU COME FORWARD. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME CLEARLY FOR THE RECORD. AND WE ALSO ASK THAT YOU SUBMIT A SPEAKER CARD TO INCLUDE FOR THE RECORD. THIS TIME I WOULD ASK THE VILLAGE CLERK, HAS THIS ITEM BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED? YES, SIR. THE ITEM HAS BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED AND THE NOTICE WAS INCLUDED IN THE BACKUP FOR THE ITEM. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AT THIS TIME, I WOULD ASK IF ANY BOARD MEMBER HAS ANY CONFLICT OF INTEREST UNDER THE RELEVANT VOTING CONFLICT STATUTE THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THEM FROM VOTING ON THIS ITEM. I WOULD ASK YOU TO PLEASE DISCLOSE THIS FOR THE RECORD, COMPLETE THE REQUIRED VOTING CONFLICT FORM AND PROVIDE IT TO THE VILLAGE CLERK. IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE PCAB THAT HAS A VOTING CONFLICT TO DECLARE? SEEING NONE, I WILL MOVE ON TO OUR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION DISCLOSURE. IF ANY BOARD MEMBER HAS ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS TO DISCLOSE CONCERNING THIS ITEM, I WOULD ASK YOU TO PLEASE DISCLOSE THAT BY IDENTIFYING THE SUBJECT OF THE COMMUNICATION, THE IDENTITY OF THE PERSON, GROUP OR ENTITY WITH WHOM THE COMMUNICATION TOOK PLACE, OR ANY CORRESPONDENCE THAT YOU RECEIVED CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. DOES ANY MEMBER OF THE PCB HAVE ANYTHING TO DISCLOSE? I'LL START WITH THE CHAIR I DO. I SPOKE BRIEFLY WITH MR. MARSHALL, A REPRESENTATIVE FOR FPL. HE WANTED TO INFORMALLY INTRODUCE HIMSELF AND ASKED IF I HAD ANY QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE ITEM FOR THE PROJECT. THANK YOU, MISS WILLIAMSON. YES. SAME MARSHALL WITH FPL. SAME. JUST QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE AGENDA ITEM. VERY GOOD. IS THERE ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE PCB? YES. 
          MR. WATSON SPOKE WITH MR. MARSHALL ABOUT THE SAME SAME ISSUES. GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE APPLICATION? ALL RIGHT. YES, MA'AM. VERY GOOD. SAME THING QUESTION THOUGH. SO IT'S JUST WITH WHOEVER WHO IS THE PART OF THE I GUESS THE APPLICANT. IT'S IT'S NOT JUST COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE APPLICANT. IT'S IT IS ALSO COMMUNICATIONS YOU MAY HAVE RECEIVED FROM OTHERS TO THE SUBSTANCE OF THE APPLICATION. GOOD LORD, WHO HAVEN'T I TALKED TO? AND IF IF THE COMMUNICATIONS HAVE HAVE BEEN MOSTLY GENERAL AND BROAD, IT WOULD BE OKAY IN THAT INSTANCE, JUST TO SAY MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY HAVE ASKED YOU ABOUT IT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, IF THAT IS AN ACCURATE STATEMENT. IF THERE ARE ANY PARTICULAR IN-DEPTH CONVERSATIONS ON IT, IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE ALSO TO PUT THEM ON THE RECORD. OKAY. WELL, SOME OF THEM WENT FOR LIKE AN HOUR AND A HALF, BUT ON THE PHONE. BUT YEAH, GENERAL PUBLIC. 
          ABSOLUTELY. I HAVE ALSO WITH MARSHALL. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU SIR. I BELIEVE THAT'S EVERYONE. 
          IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE TO DISCLOSE IN THAT RESPECT? SAME FOR ME. JUST THE GENERAL PUBLIC AS WELL. LIKE SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT TALKING TO PEOPLE IN GENERAL. PUBLIC. UNDERSTOOD. 
          VERY GOOD. AT THAT TIME. AT THIS TIME. THAT'S ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE AND SPEECH TO GIVE. MADAM CHAIR, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO STAFF TO PROCEED WITH STAFF'S PRESENTATION ON THE ITEM AND THEN AFTER STAFF'S PRESENTATION, ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PCB, THE APPLICANT WILL COME UP AND GIVE THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. YES. GOOD EVENING. DEENA FREEMAN WITH THE COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNER ON THE REVIEW. ON BEHALF OF A REPRESENTATIVE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES WHO REVIEW THE PROJECT. SO, TESORO GROVES, THERE WAS AN ANNEXATION AS PROJECT PARROT, A 5720 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. JUST TO RECAP ON WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY AND PUT IT INTO CONTEXT BEFORE WE GET INTO THE THE PRESENTATION. LUCY'S ALSO PUTTING UP A. AND IF YOU COULD. YEAH. SO WE HAVE A PIERRE.D MASTER SITE PLAN. SO WE. WE'VE ALREADY, AS THE VILLAGE VILLAGE COUNCIL AND TRANSMITTED TO STATE AND APPROVED LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE. AND WITH THE PROPERTY HAVING MOVED FROM MARTIN COUNTY'S JURISDICTION TO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, THERE IS A REQUIREMENT TO HAVE A LAND USE AND ZONING ON THE PROPERTY OF AHEAD OF ANY DEVELOPMENT, FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THAT SITE. AND THAT'S A REQUIREMENT AT STATE STATUTE AND OF OUR COMP PLAN. AND IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING ON THAT PROPERTY, AND WE HAVE A REQUIREMENT OF 
          [00:10:04]
STAFF TO INTAKE AND REVIEW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS. AND YOU BEING THE PCB, AS THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, ARE THE FIRST STAGE IN THE SERIES OF THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS. WHAT WE HAVE HERE AND WANTED TO PUT IT UP BECAUSE IT'S NOT ALWAYS VERY CLEAR. AND IF WE COULD ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT, LUCY, ON ON THE NOTATIONS AND THE DETAILS. THIS IS A THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE ZONING AGREEMENT AND IT'S THE MASTER SITE PLAN. AND THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE AT THIS STAGE THAT IS INCLUDED AS AN EXHIBIT IN THE PUD. AND THIS IS THE OVERALL SITE AREA OF THE 5720 SOMETHING ACRES. WHAT IT SHOWS IS THE EXISTING USES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE. IN THE AREAS WHERE THE 506 ACRES WITH THE EXISTING OPERATIONS, INCLUDING THE SOLAR PANELS AND THE REST OF THE SITE AND THE DEVELOPMENT DATA, IT SHOWS THE OVERALL SITE AREA. IT LOOKS AT THE EXISTING LAND USE, THE PROPOSED ZONING AND EXISTING ZONING. IT DETAILS THE OVERALL ACREAGE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT ALSO PROVIDES SOME EXPECTATIONS AND COMMITMENTS IN TERMS OF SETBACKS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BUT AT THIS STAGE IT'S A MASTER SITE PLAN STAGE. SO IN TERMS OF ACTUAL DETAIL ON THE THE WHAT YOU WOULD SEE IN A FINAL SITE PLAN, THIS IS NOT WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW. AND I WANTED TO PUT THIS UP. AND IF YOU CAN ZOOM BACK OUT, LUCY, WHAT IT ALSO DOES AS PART OF THE EXHIBIT IS INCLUDE ON PAGE TWO, A PHASING PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. AND IT'S, IT'S SLICED INTO THREE DIFFERENT PHASES. AND WE'LL GET INTO THAT A LITTLE BIT LATER. BUT ULTIMATELY, FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT OF, OF PROPOSED A THREE PHASE PROJECT. THEY CAN DEVELOP IT INDIVIDUALLY AS EACH OF THOSE PHASES OR ALL THREE PHASES AT ONCE IF THEY'RE APPROVED, BUT NOT AT THE MASTER SITE PLAN LEVEL, THEY HAVE TO COME IN WITH A FINAL SITE PLAN FOR EACH OF THOSE FAVORS. ALL PHASES, ALL OF THOSE PHASES. SO THERE IS A DIFFERENT STEP AFTER THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND BEFORE VILLAGE COUNCIL, WHICH IS THE SITE PLAN STAGE. AND I GET INTO THAT IN MY REPORT, BUT I WANTED TO PUT THIS UP BECAUSE IN THE PACKETS, IT'S QUITE SMALL AND I WANTED YOU TO SEE THE TOOLS AND THE THE REQUIREMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN PUT ONTO THIS DOCUMENT AS PART OF THE EXHIBIT OF WHAT IS CALLED A PLAN, UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING AGREEMENT. OKAY, SO WE'RE GOING TO START THE PRESENTATION. THIS WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET. AND WHAT ELSE WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET WAS ALL THE APPLICATION MATERIALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. SEVERAL HUNDRED PAGES. IT ALSO INCLUDES THE STAFF REPORT. THIS IS THE STAFF REPORT. HAVING DONE AN INITIAL STAFF REPORT AS THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, COLLEAGUES AND THEN THE APPLICANT RESUBMITTED TO ADDRESS ANY ISSUES. AND THEY TOOK A VERY THERE WAS A PUD ZONING AGREEMENT DOCUMENT THAT WAS TAKEN. AND WE WORKED VERY HARD ON THAT, WITH WADE BEING THE FOREFRONT OF THAT TO MAKE SURE IT WAS LEGALLY TIGHT, BUT ALSO PROVIDED ENOUGH SAFEGUARDS AND CONDITIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AT THE STAGE OF MASTER SITE PLAN THAT WE WERE CONFIDENT IT WAS READY FOR RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF AS ACCEPTABLE AND FOR APPROVAL. SO TESORO GROVES PD AND ZONING REZONING IS REQUIRED AT THE STATE STATUTE LEVEL, AND THE REZONING IS TO A, B, D AND THEN THE PUD IS A SEPARATE APPLICATION, AS WADE SAID, WHICH IS THE PD ZONING AGREEMENT. IT ALSO HAS THE MASTER SITE PLAN, THE PHASING PLAN, THE TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND ANY COMMITMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT IN TERMS OF REASSURANCE THAT GOES BEYOND A REGULAR ZONING CODE SUCH AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. SO LET'S START THE SLIDESHOW. SO APPLICANT COMBINED REQUEST THE REZONING TO A PUD, WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE EITHER PUD OR A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO BE ABLE TO COME INTO THE VILLAGE. AND THEY'RE ALREADY IN THIS VILLAGE. SO WE NEED TO GIVE THEM A ZONING. THE ZONING AGREEMENT, MASTER SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS WHAT THEY'RE HERE TO REQUEST APPROVAL OF. THE DETAILED DOCUMENT THAT WAS IN THERE. I THINK IT WAS AROUND 30 PAGES OF ZONING AGREEMENT AND EXHIBITS IS WHAT'S GOING TO BE INCLUDED. AND IF APPROVED, RUNS WITH THE PROPERTY. IT'S 5,722.30 ACRES. 
          AND THIS IS A FRAMEWORK FOR APPROVAL. THIS IS NOT A SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT OR WHAT YOU COULD CALL A FINAL SITE PLAN AT THIS STAGE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED AND I CAN'T EMPHASIZE IT ENOUGH, IT'S A PD ZONING DISTRICT. THIS IS WHERE YOU ESTABLISH THE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK WITHIN THE COMMITMENTS IN THE PD ZONING AGREEMENT. AND ON THAT DOCUMENT THAT WE JUST SHOWED YOU AS THE MASTER SITE PLAN IS A MAXIMUM INTENSITY, WHICH IS LIMITED BASED ON TRIPS GENERATED BY 2,000,000FT■S OF GENERAL LIGHT. INDUSTRIAL. 
          GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IS A TERM USED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND THE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT CAN HELP IF YOU NEED FURTHER DETAILS. BUT ULTIMATELY THE GLE TRIP. THE CAP IS GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IN TRAFFIC AND TRIP TERMS. AND THEN IT'S OBVIOUSLY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IN TERMS OF USE AND LAND USE. AND THERE ARE PHASING PLANS AS WE SHOWED YOU. IT'S THREE PHASES AND THERE ARE STANDARDS. ALL OF THAT IS INCLUDED IN THAT LONG, DETAILED LEGAL DOCUMENT, THE ZONING 
          [00:15:06]
AGREEMENT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. WHAT IS NOT BEING PROPOSED. AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO EMPHASIZE THERE ARE NO BUILDINGS AT THIS STAGE. ALL TENANTS. THERE IS NO FINAL SITE DESIGN, NO INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY IS RESERVED. AND THIS IS NOT JUST AN INDIAN TOWN. THIS WOULD BE IN MARTIN COUNTY AND OTHER GOVERNMENTS IN FLORIDA. YOU OBSERVE CAPACITY AT THE FINAL SITE PLAN STAGE AND NOT OTHER PD MASTER. IT IS DEFERRED UNTIL FINAL AND IT REQUIRES A FUTURE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY OF THOSE PHASES. NEXT SLIDE. AND THIS IS A SUMMARY OF THE PROCESS. SO THEY HAVE TO HAVE THE REZONING STATE STATUTE. IF YOU'VE COME INTO THE VILLAGE AND YOU HAVE A LAND USE, YOU HAVE TO HAVE A ZONING. THE PD FRAMEWORK IS WHAT THEY'RE ESTABLISHED AND THEY'VE ESTABLISHED IN THE APPLICATION PACKET AND IN THOSE AGREEMENTS THAT WILL GO WITH THE THE DRAFT ORDINANCE THAT WADE'S PREPARED, THAT WILL BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS IF IF APPROVED. AND THEN AT THAT STAGE, THE NEXT STAGE, AFTER THE SUCCESS OF THE PD APPROVAL AND REZONING WOULD BE A FINAL SITE PLAN. AND THAT'S WHERE I TALK ABOUT CONCURRENCY AND IMPACTS AS BEING EVALUATED AT THAT STAGE. THE NEXT SLIDE, AND THIS IS THE LOCATION. I THINK YOU'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE AT THIS POINT, BUT THIS IS THE LOCATION. 
          IT'S WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIAL AND ENERGY CORRIDOR. THE THE LAND TO THE WEST IS A LOT OF THAT LAND TO THE NORTHWEST IS PART OF THE EXISTING OPERATION WITH FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. AND THEN WE'VE GOT OBVIOUSLY THE SITE DEPICTED IN RED, AND IT'S BASICALLY ADJACENT TO SOME HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES. AS I SAID, MAJOR UTILITY AND POWER GENERATION FACILITIES. SOME OF THAT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT OPERATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SO IT'S NOT COMPLETELY VACANT AND UNUSED. AND TO THE WEST IS EXTENSIVE UTILITY POWER GENERATION IDENTIFIED WITH THE MARTIN COUNTY AS A LAND USE UNIQUE TO ITSELF. BASICALLY, IT'S THAT EXTENSIVE. THERE ARE NO NO NEARBY RESIDENTIAL CONCENTRATIONS. AND THIS HAS BEEN DEEMED TO BE A LOGICAL EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS WITHIN THE VILLAGE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS THE ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIAL AND ENERGY CORRIDOR WITH THE LAND USES THAT ARE SHOWN. THE PURPLE DEPICTS THE FUTURE LAND USE OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AND WE'VE GOT OBVIOUSLY WE SHOW YOU THE LAND USE. AND THIS WAS IN THE PACKET AND THERE IS A FULL DETAILED ANALYSIS AND TABLE DEPICTING ALL THE SURROUNDING LAND USES. THERE ARE SOME CONSERVATION LANDS TO THE WEST AND TO THE SOUTH THAT WILL REMAIN THAT. THAT'S SEPARATE OWNERSHIP AND A BUFFER AND A ROUNDING OFF OF THIS AREA OF INDIAN TOWN IN TERMS OF THE INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR. SO THERE'S A LAND USE MAP AND THE EXISTING ENERGY CORRIDOR. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS FOR FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE GRAY ON THE MAP SHOWS THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IN RELATION TO THE VILLAGE. AS YOU CAN SEE, I'VE HAD TO COLOR THAT IN BECAUSE THE GIS HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED YET. SO IT'S NOT QUITE THE SAME GRAY. YOU KNOW, AS AS WHAT I COULD HAVE DONE. BUT IT DOES SHOW YOU THE EXTENT OF THE PROPERTY. IT'S LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AND THEN IN RELATION TO THE OTHER LIGHT AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL IN THE MAP, IT WAS AGAIN CREATED. SO THE HATCHED AREA INDICATES PUD OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. AND THIS IS WHAT THEY'VE APPLIED FOR AS THAT ONE ACTION. AND THAT IS TO CHANGE THE ZONING MAP TO REFLECT THE PUD ZONING. IT'S NOT THE ONLY PUD ZONING AGREEMENT IN PLACE IN THE VILLAGE. OBVIOUSLY, WE'VE GOT TERRA LARGO'S ONE OF THE MORE RECENT ONES. WELL, RECENT IS A 20 YEAR PROJECT BUT RECENTLY IMPLEMENTED. AND WE'VE GOT OTHER ONES LIKE OSCEOLA PINES. WE'VE GOT THE INDIAN TOWN PERMIT READY SITE, INDIAN TOWN COMMERCE PARK, I'M SORRY. AND WE'VE GOT THE VENTURE INDUSTRIAL PARK. SO THIS IS NOT THE ONLY PUD THAT AND AND SOME OF THEM ARE RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE, BUT THERE'S, THERE'S QUITE A FEW OF INDUSTRIAL. WE'VE GOT SOME THAT HAVE EXPIRED AND ARE DEFUNCT, BUT THEY'RE STILL A PIERRE.D STATUS THAT COMES FROM MARTIN COUNTY AS WELL. AND IT IS AN OPTION FOR THEM REQUESTING THE ZONING DESIGNATION. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO ECONOMIC AND PLANNING CONTEXT, THE VILLAGE'S INDUSTRIAL LAND SUPPLY. BUT AND THIS IS A BIG BUT THE LARGE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT READY SITES ARE LIMITED WITHIN THE VILLAGE, THE SIZE, THE SIZE OF THE SITE, AND THE LOCATION SUPPORTS MAJOR EMPLOYERS. 5720 ACRES PROVIDES A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT CAN BALANCE OUT THE HOUSING THAT'S BEING BUILT WITHIN THE VILLAGE. 
          YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO HAVE THAT EMPLOYMENT AND RESIDENTIAL AS A BALANCE. SO THIS OFFERS THAT BUILDS ON THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR ALONG STATE ROAD 710. IT SUPPORTS LONG TERM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES, AND IT DOES NOT BYPASS REVIEW. AND ANY FUTURE PROJECT MUST 
          [00:20:02]
MEET ALL APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND APPROVALS. SO WE HAVE A CODE, WE HAVE THE COMP PLAN, WE HAVE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, WE HAVE A PUD THAT HAS GOT SOME SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS THAT GO BEYOND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE REASON THAT WE HAVE THE PUD AND ACTUALLY ON THE AGENDA IS BECAUSE STAFF ACTUALLY REQUESTED THAT THIS WOULD BE THE WAY THAT COULD PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS. IT CAN PROVIDE ASSURANCES, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AND IT GOES BEYOND THE REGULAR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND THOSE STANDARDS IN THE CODE. AND WE'VE WORKED VERY HARD ON THAT TO MAKE SURE THAT SOME OF THE ASSURANCES AND SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN SPOKEN ABOUT THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE PUD. WE'VE LISTENED, AND WE'VE TRIED TO ACCOMMODATE SOME OF THOSE SAFEGUARDS SO THAT THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE HAS GOT MORE ACCOUNTABILITY THAN YOU WOULD IN A REGULAR LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION CODE. AND THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE AND KEY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PUD AND THE REGULAR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. COMPATIBILITY. INDUSTRIAL AND UTILITY USES ARE NEARBY. AND WE TALKED ABOUT THE PRESENCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT AND THAT EXTENSIVE OPERATION THAT HAS EXISTED FOR MANY YEARS. AGRICULTURE AND CONSERVATION PROVIDES BUFFERS TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST. THERE ARE NO BIONEER, NO NEARBY RESIDENTIAL CONCENTRATIONS, AND IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE AREA PATTERN WITHIN THIS PART OF INDIAN TOWN. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. 
          THERE IS A DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM THAT'S BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE ZONING AGREEMENT, AND IT'S INCLUDED IN IN NOTATION ON THE MASTER PLAN. AND THAT'S THAT MAXIMUM 2,000,000FT■S, GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TRIP CAP. AND THAT'S AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT. AND WE CAN LET THE APPLICANT TEAM EXPLAIN THE COMPARISONS BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT THAT COULD BE IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING VERSUS WITH THE THE CAP SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION FROM ALLOWABLE INTENSITY. AND THAT AND AGAIN, THEY'LL EXPLAIN THAT I'M JUST SUMMARIZING. AND IT'S ALSO INCLUDED AT LENGTH IN MY REPORT PHASE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH, AS OPPOSED TO BUILDING AN ENTIRE 5720 ACRES AT ONCE. IT'S, IT'S MORE PRACTICAL, IT'S MORE COMMON SENSE, AND IT'S MORE REALISTIC TO DO IT THIS WAY, LIMITS TRAFFIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS. AND THAT'S WHERE THAT 2,000,000 SQUARE FOOT GLEE TRIP CAP REALLY IS VERY IMPORTANT. AND SOMETHING THAT WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED UNDER THE STRICT ZONING PHASE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH LIMITS TRAFFIC, AND THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CAP REPRESENTS A VOLUNTARY LIMITATION BELOW THE MAXIMUM INTENSITY OTHERWISE PERMITTED. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND SOME OF THE SAFEGUARDS AND CONTROLS AND THEY'RE IN DETAILED IN IN LIKE LEGAL LANGUAGE AND ON THE MASTER PLAN AND THE PHASING PLAN. BUT IT IS THAT THE TRIP CAP IS VERY IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ACCOUNTABILITY FROM THE APPLICANT AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT. EVERY TIME THEY SUBMIT A SITE PLAN, THEY WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTING A TRAFFIC STUDY THAT ANALYZES BASED ON THE ACTUAL SPECIFIC USE. BECAUSE THE LIST OF USES THAT ARE INCLUDED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IF YOUR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OR YOU'RE A PUD. IT'S THE SAME LIST OF PERMITTED USES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF RESIDENTIAL, WHICH THEY VOLUNTARILY PROVIDED AS UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS AN IMPORTANT AREA FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SOMETHING THAT CAN BALANCE OUT THE HOUSING SUPPLY THAT WE'RE WE'RE GROWING AS A VILLAGE AND THERE'S MORE HOUSING THERE SHOULD BE MORE BALANCED WITH THAT WITH EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. SO PEOPLE ARE NOT HAVING TO COMMUTE OUTSIDE OF THE VILLAGE. 
          AND WE CAN GET THAT RECRUITMENT FROM WITHIN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. THERE ARE SOME NOISE LIGHTING AND OPERATIONS STANDARDS. I'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS AND QUESTIONS AROUND THE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS THAT WE HAVE THEM IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND THEY ARE APPLIED TO EVERY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT'S APPROVED MOVING FORWARD. SINCE I'VE BEEN WORKING HERE ALMOST THREE YEARS, WE'VE REQUESTED THAT BECAUSE IT PROVIDES THE SAFEGUARDS AND THE ASSURANCES REGARDING NOISE, GLARE, DUST, SMOKE AND LIGHTING, AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN THEN IF THEY'RE NOT APPLYING THOSE AND ARE MEETING THOSE STANDARDS, THEN WE CAN LOOK AT ENFORCEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY. AND WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE WITH THE PUD ZONING AGREEMENT IS THAT THEY GO ABOVE AND BEYOND THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND WHAT THEY PROVIDE IN THE ZONING AGREEMENT IS ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS AROUND NOISE AND AROUND ACCOUNTABILITY IN REPORTING BACK TO STAFF AND HAVING INFORMATION BASED ON IF WHEN IT'S DEVELOPED, HOW IS IT GOING TO OPERATE AND IS IT PERFORMING IN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS THAT WOULD BE ADOPTED IN THE PUD? AND SO IT GIVES THOSE THOSE THRESHOLDS, THOSE PARAMETERS AND ACCOUNTABILITY. AND THAT'S NOT SOMETHING OTHER THAN THE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. THEY GO BEYOND THAT AND THEY PROVIDE ACTUAL REPORTING ON IT. AT THIS POINT, IT'S IN THERE AS AN ANNUAL REPORTING, BUT EVERY STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT, THEY'LL ALSO NEED TO ASSESS BASED ON THE USE, HOW ARE THEY GOING TO MEET. AND THEN ARE THEY MEETING THOSE STANDARDS. SO THERE'S ACCOUNTABILITY AND PARAMETERS. THERE'S ALSO SOME ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING REQUIRED. ANY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT THIS SCALE WILL NEED. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 
          [00:25:04]
PROTECTION, SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. IT MAY BE THE ARMY CORPS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. IF THERE WAS SOME WELLS ON SITE, THERE WOULD BE SOME HEALTH DEPARTMENT REVIEWS. THERE'S THIRD PARTY REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT, WHETHER IT'S AT THIS SCALE OR EVEN AT JUST A MINOR OR MAJOR SITE PLAN STAGE. BUT AS A PUD, WHEN THEY COME IN WITH THEIR FINAL, THERE WILL BE AND THEY COMMIT THAT IN THE PUD AND EMPHASIZE WHAT THEY'RE COMMITTING TO IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDS IN THE PUD. AND DEVELOPMENT IS CONTINGENT UPON DEMONSTRATED INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY. AS I SAID, THEY DON'T RESERVE CAPACITY AT THIS POINT. 
          WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO IS THAT'S WHAT'S DONE AT EACH STAGE OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN. AND IT WILL NOT BE APPROVED UNLESS THEY HAVE ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONNECTION AND CAPACITY AND FIRE FLOW AND ALL THE OTHER ELEMENTS THAT ARE REVIEWED BY OUR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES AND THEIR PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY AHEAD OF ANY APPROVAL BEING ISSUED, THEY HAVE TO SHOW THAT THEY CAN ACCOMMODATE THIS PROJECT, ANY PROJECT ON THAT SITE, AND IT'S AN ENFORCEABLE PUD, AND THAT COMES FROM A CODE COMPLIANCE POINT OF VIEW AND ACCOUNTABILITY AND REPORTING BASIS. AND IT DEFINITELY GOES BEYOND THE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND I TALKED ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS. 
          THIS APPROVAL OF THIS MASTER PLAN DOESN'T TAKE AWAY THE REQUIREMENT FOR WETLAND DELINEATIONS. IT WILL BE REQUIRED. IT'S EVEN IN MARTIN COUNTY. AGAIN, I COMPARE BECAUSE I HAVE EXPERIENCE IN BOTH GOVERNMENTS AND THEY'RE VERY STRICT TO WETLAND. 
          DELINEATION IS REQUIRED AND IT'S REQUIRED AT THE SITE PLAN STAGE, AND IT'S REQUIRED TO BE DELINEATED AND VERIFIED BY SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. I TALKED EARLIER ABOUT THE SOME OF THE THIRD PARTY PERMITS THAT ARE THERE. THERE'S HABITAT PROTECTION AND THERE'S IMPACTS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BEFORE DEVELOPMENT MAY OCCUR. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. 
          AND THIS IS THE ZONING MASTER PLAN AND WE PUT THAT UP EARLIER. BUT I WANTED TO BE ABLE TO ZOOM IN AND OUT AND SEE THE TEXT. AND WE'VE GOT THE EXISTING SOLAR ENERGY CENTER, WHICH IS THERE AND IS IT'S NOT LOOKING TO LEAVE. IT'S GOING TO BE THERE, AND IT'S NOT INCLUDED IN THE PHASING PLAN BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY EXISTING. SO IT'S NOT A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. AND THEN I DEPICT WITH THE FPL, THAT'S THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND THIS IS JUST SHOWING YOU THE PHASES. IT'S THE EXISTING SOLAR ENERGY. AND THEN THREE PHASES WITH THE ORANGE BEING THE THIRD PHASE, GREEN BEING THE SECOND AND BLUE BEING THE FIRST PHASE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO THE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK, SOME OF THIS IS REPETITIVE. I'VE ALREADY SPOKEN ABOUT IT, BUT I APOLOGIZE. I WANT TO REALLY GET ACROSS THE THE MAIN FACTS. THE PD ESTABLISHES THE REGULATORY STRUCTURE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. THAT INCLUDES THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT THRESHOLD OF THE 2,000,000FT■S BASED ON THE GENERAL. SORRY, THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CAP PHASE DEVELOPMENT TIED TO INFRASTRUCTURE AVAILABILITY. 
          THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ARE GOVERNING THE OPERATIONS. THEY'RE INCLUDED IN THE PD ZONING AGREEMENT, THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND PERMITTING PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS REMAIN IN FORCE, AND THEY'LL BE REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. AND WE HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER THAT REVIEWS THE ENVIRONMENTAL IS VERY QUALIFIED AND EXPERIENCED AND ALSO WOULD REVIEW THE LANDSCAPE. ANY LANDSCAPE PLANS THAT COME WITH THE FINAL NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. PD KEY FINDINGS. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT PROVIDES A UNIFIED AND COORDINATED DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK. IT ENSURES IMPACTS ARE EVALUATED AT THE APPROPRIATE STAGE. IT REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH CONCURRENCY, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS AND EMPHASIS. AGAIN, NO DEVELOPMENT MAY PROCEED WITHOUT DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 
          NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. WHY THE PD PROVIDES GREATER CONTROL. IT ALLOWS SITE SPECIFIC STANDARDS. 
          IT ENABLES PHASED INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY. IT REQUIRES FUTURE DETAILED REVIEW AND APPROVALS. IT PROVIDES GREATER CONTROL THAN THE CONVENTIONAL ZONING. BY THAT I MEAN THE REGULAR LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING. THE PD PROVIDES A HIGHER LEVEL OF REGULATORY CONTROL THAN THAT CONVENTIONAL ZONING REQUIRED BY REQUIRING STAGED APPROVALS AND ENFORCED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. THE KEY CONDITIONS BUILT INTO THE APPROVAL IS THERE WILL BE NO VERTICAL DEVELOPMENT AT THIS STAGE. APPROVED AT THIS STAGE, THE REQUIRES NO DEMONSTRATED CAPACITY BECAUSE THERE'S NO DEVELOPMENT RIGHT NOW. IT'S A COLOR ON A MAP AND A LEGAL DOCUMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. TRAFFIC IMPACTS EVALUATED AT THE SITE PLAN STAGE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS CONTROL THE NOISE, LIGHTING OPERATIONS AND OTHER, INCLUDING THE PD, AND THE PHASE DEVELOPMENT ENSURES THE CONTROLLED GROWTH. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. THIS WAS QUITE A LOT OF WORDING. PD APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR THE LDR. SECTION 1210. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN, UNIFIED COORDINATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN, COMPATIBILITY 
          [00:30:03]
WITH SURROUNDING USES, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND CONCURRENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. I'M NOT GOING TO READ ALL OF THAT AGAIN BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY COVERED IT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. 
          RECOMMENDATION. THIS IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF AS THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES. 
          THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE REZONING AS 2026 002 AND APPROVE THE SITE PLAN 20 6-005, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS THAT ARE SET FORTH IN THE PD AGREEMENT, THE ORDINANCE AND THE APPROVAL DOCUMENTS. THE APPROVAL ESTABLISHES A FRAMEWORK AND NOT A DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. AND I REALLY WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT. AND THAT'S THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. THE APPLICANT IS HERE WITH THEIR TEAM. THERE ARE OBVIOUSLY OPPORTUNITIES FOR QUESTIONS OF STAFF, BUT THERE'S ALSO A PRESENTATION FROM THE APPLICANT'S TEAM AS WELL. SO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH YOU TONIGHT. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, CHAIR AND PLANNING AND ZONING AND AND APPEALS BOARD COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS JAMIE GENTILE, FOR THE RECORD. AND I'M WITH FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. I'M GOING TO TRY TO MAKE MY COMMENTS BRIEF, AND I'M GOING TO ASK MR. NOLAN TO COME UP AND ACTUALLY WALK THROUGH A SLIDE PRESENTATION HERE IN SHORT ORDER. BUT I WANTED TO JUST GIVE YOU A BIT OF AN INTRODUCTION TO OURS. FOR THE RECORD. 700 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD, JUNIOR BEACH, FLORIDA. AND I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HERE THIS EVENING TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THE TESORO GROVES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. THIS REQUEST, AND AGAIN, I APOLOGIZE FOR SOME OF THE REPETITION, BUT THIS REQUEST IS NOT FOR A SPECIFIC BUILDING'S TENANTS OR DETAILED SITE PLANS. INSTEAD, IT ESTABLISHES A FRAMEWORK THAT DEFINES HOW THIS PROPERTY COULD DEVELOP OVER TIME AND HOW THE VILLAGE WOULD REMAIN INVOLVED IN THAT. AS THAT DEVELOPMENT UNFOLDS. THIS REQUEST, THE THE REQUEST BUILDS ON THE EARLIER ACTIONS OF THE BOARD OF THIS BOARD AND THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, WHICH TOOK OVER, WHICH TOOK PLACE OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS RELATED TO ANNEXATION AND THE FUTURE LAND USE, WHICH ENSURED DECISIONS ABOUT THE PROPERTY THAT ARE THAT WOULD BE MADE LOCALLY. THIS NEXT STEP PROVIDES A CLEAR STRUCTURE, SO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS COME FORWARD IN AN ORGANIZED WAY, RATHER THAN THROUGH A SERIES OF DISCONNECTED BY RIGHT REQUESTS. THE FRAMEWORK ITSELF SUPPORTS A RANGE OF LIGHT, INDUSTRIAL AND UTILITY RELATED USES THAT ARE LISTED AS PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE VILLAGE CODE. THESE INCLUDE THINGS LIKE ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH FACILITIES, DATA PROCESSING CENTERS, AND OTHER SIMILAR USES, ALONG WITH THE UTILITY OPERATIONS COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH FPL OPERATIONS SUCH AS SUBSTATIONS, TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES, SOLAR ENERGY AND BATTERY STORAGE JUST AS IMPORTANT AS THE RANGE OF POTENTIAL USES ARE ARE ARE THE PROTECTIVE MEASURES BUILT INTO THE PD. THE FRAMEWORK OF THE PD ESTABLISHES CLEAR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, LIMITS OVERALL INTENSITY, AND ENSURES THE FUTURE PROJECTS ARE REVIEWED INDIVIDUALLY WITH DETAILED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS BEFORE MOVING FORWARD. THESE GUARDRAILS ARE INTENDED TO HELP MANAGE IMPACTS, PROTECT SURROUNDING AREAS AND GIVE THE VILLAGE CONFIDENCE THAT DEVELOPMENT WILL OCCUR IN A MEASURED AND DELIBERATE WAY. FROM A BROADER PERSPECTIVE, THE APPROACH HAS THE POTENTIAL TO DELIVER MEANINGFUL LONG TERM BENEFITS TO THE VILLAGE. IT SUPPORTS ECONOMIC INVESTMENT AND JOB CREATION, HELPS DIVERSIFY AND STRENGTHEN THE TAX BASE, AND ALIGNS DEVELOPMENT WITH AN EXISTING WITHIN WITHIN AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL AND ENERGY CORRIDOR. 
          WE RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF WORKING COLLABORATIVELY, COLLABORATIVELY WITH THE VILLAGE AND THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY, AND WE VIEW THIS FRAMEWORK AS A WAY TO ENSURE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IS THOUGHTFULLY PLANNED, RESPONSIBLY REVIEWED, AND ALIGNED WITH COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS. OVER TIME, ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOULD OCCUR INCREMENTALLY, SUPPORTED BY DETAILED, AGAIN DETAILED TECHNICAL STUDIES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC INPUT. AND AGAIN, NOTHING BEYOND THIS OVERALL FRAMEWORK IS BEING APPROVED TONIGHT. WITH THAT CONTEXT, I AS I MENTIONED, I'M GOING TO ASK BRIAN NOLAN WITH LUCIDO AND ASSOCIATES TO WALK YOU THROUGH THE DETAILS OF THE REQUEST AND SUBSEQUENT TO ANY BOARD QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE OF US OR MISS FREEMAN. WE WOULD LIKE TO RESERVE THE RIGHT, IF NECESSARY, TO, FOR REBUTTAL AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT. AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, BRIAN NOLAN, A PARTNER WITH LUCIDO AND 
          [00:35:01]
ASSOCIATES HERE TONIGHT REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK STAFF AND VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION FOR THEIR TIME AND EFFORTS OVER THIS PAST SIX, SIX PLUS MONTHS OR SO. I KNOW WE'VE WE'VE GONE A LOT BACK AND FORTH A LOT. IT'S BEEN QUITE AN EFFORT. 
          HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF PAGES OF DOCUMENTS TO GO THROUGH AND REDLINES AND REVISIONS. SO WE DO WE TRULY APPRECIATE YOUR STAFF'S TIME AND EFFORT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO AS WE KNOW, I'M GOING TO BREEZE THROUGH SOME OF THESE. THE SITE'S APPROXIMATELY 5722 ACRES. IT'S LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY AND SOUTH AND WEST OF THE VILLAGE'S URBAN CORE. THE SUBJECT PARCELS, AS WAS DISCUSSED, ARE CURRENTLY ASSIGNED THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE. AND WE ARE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT SEEKING THE REZONING TO PUD AND PUD ZONING AGREEMENT AND MASTER SITE PLAN. YOU SEE HERE THE SITE OUTLINED HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW IN CONTEXT WITH THE GREATER VILLAGE AREA. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. THIS SLIDE HIGHLIGHTS THE NORTHERN SECTION OF THE PROPOSED PUD NORTH OF THE NORTH OF THE WATERWAY, AND THAT YOU CAN SEE KIND OF GOING FROM UPPER LEFT TO TO LOWER RIGHT. YOU CAN SEE AN EXISTING FPL SOLAR FACILITY. WE HAVE THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING LANDS. THE FORMER FPL INDIAN TOWN COGEN FACILITY. I TOWN RAIL AND COMMERCE FLORIDIAN NATURAL GAS. 
          AND THEN IT TAPERS DOWN TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AND THEN ON THE SITE WE ALSO HAVE THE FPL MONARCH SOLAR FACILITY NORTH OF FARM ROAD AND THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY. AND ALSO THE BALANCE OF THE SITE IS MADE UP OF FPL MONARCH SOLAR, SOUTH OF FARM ROAD, SOUTH OF THE WATERWAY. YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE CONSERVATION LANDS TO THE WEST AND TO THE SOUTH THAT SERVES AS. AS MISS FREEMAN POINTED OUT, AS KIND OF A NATURAL. BOOKENDS, IF YOU WILL. ALSO, WE HAVE FPL OWNED AGRICULTURAL LANDS TO THE EAST. CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE OF THE SITE IS ILLUSTRATED HERE, AND YOU CAN SEE THE RELATIVE PROXIMITY OF THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL FUTURE, LAND USE AND THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE ON THE NORTHERN EXTENT OF THE PUD BOUNDARY. THIS SLIDE REPRESENTS THE PROPOSED ZONING AGAIN TO PUT THE HATCH THE BLUE HATCHED AREA, AND THEN YOU CAN ALSO SEE THE RELATIVE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. AS IT RELATES TO COMPATIBILITY AND CONSISTENCY. THE PROPOSED REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH AND IMPLEMENTS THE LI FUTURE LAND USE. THE USES ALLOWED IN AND CONTROLLED BY THE PUD AGREEMENT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE USES ALREADY ALLOWED WITHIN THE LI FUTURE LAND USE. THE REZONING IS ALSO CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING USES. IT'S SITUATED IN AN AREA WITH ESTABLISHED AND EXPANDING UTILITY USES. AS WE SAW IN THE PREVIOUS SLIDES, THE PROPOSED USES ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING USES AND THE CONSERVATION LANDS TO THE SOUTH AND WEST, AS WE NOTED, WILL SERVE AS A BUFFER TO ENSURE THAT THE PUD DOES NOT DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN USES. FURTHERMORE, THE SITE IS PHYSICALLY SUITABLE TO SUPPORT THE LI USES AND THAT IT'S LOCATED WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED EXPANDING INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR, AND THE LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE SITE PROMOTES EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT. RELATED TO THE PROPOSED PUD ZONING AGREEMENT AND MASTER SITE PLAN. THOSE ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE VILLAGE'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. AS WAS MENTIONED, THEY PROVIDE THE VILLAGE WITH A CLEAR AND CONCISE FRAMEWORK TO GUIDE THE LONG TERM DEVELOPMENT. OVER TIME, THEY REQUIRE THE TECHNICAL SITE SPECIFIC DESIGN TO BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN BASED ON ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED. IT ALSO LIMITS THE DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY TO 2,000,000FT■S, OR THE TRAFFIC EQUIVALENT OF GENERAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES, AS A KIND OF A REFERENCE. AT A TWO POINT 0FAR, IT'S ABOUT 500 A HAIR UNDER 500,000,000FT■S OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE PERMITTED ON THE SITE. AT 2,000,000FT■S, WE'RE UNDER ONE. WE'RE WE'RE 
          [00:40:07]
UNDER 1% OF THAT CURRENT ALLOWABLE F A R. YOUR LI FUTURE LAND USE ALSO ALLOWS RESIDENTIAL WHICH IS WHICH IS INTERESTING AT A RELATIVELY HIGH DENSITY AT 20 UNITS PER ACRE, 20 UNITS PER ACRE AT 5000 OR SO ACRES WOULD BE I MEAN, AN ASTONISHING OVER 100,000 UNITS. 
          BUT WE ARE NOT ALLOWING RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE PUD THAT THAT IS THAT IS RESTRICTED. 
          IN SUMMARY, ASSIGNMENT OF THE PUD ZONING DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH AND IMPLEMENTS THE FUTURE LAND USE. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING USES. AND AS MISS FREEMAN HAS POINTED OUT, IT IS A VALUABLE TOOL THAT ENABLES THE VILLAGE TO HAVE GREATER CONTROL OVER DEVELOPMENT VERSUS A PATCHWORK OF BY RIGHT ZONING SITE PLANS. 
          THE PD AGREEMENT AND THE MASTER SITE PLAN ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE VILLAGE'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGS. THEY PROVIDE THE VILLAGE WITH A CLEAR AND CONCISE FRAMEWORK TO GUIDE THE DEVELOPMENT OVER TIME. IT GREAT, I WOULD SAY GREATLY LIMITS THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY, AND IT REQUIRES THE TECHNICAL SITE SPECIFIC REVIEW TO BE CONDUCTED AT TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN BASED ON WHAT IS ACTUALLY PROPOSED. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. 
          AGAIN, I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND THAT OF VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION AND STAFF, AND I WOULD AGAIN RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THE OPPORTUNITY TO REBUT IF NECESSARY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YOU'RE WELCOME. WAS SOMEONE GOING TO PRESENT THE SLIDESHOW OR. OH, THAT WAS THAT WAS. SO AT THIS TIME, I'LL. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? YES, MA'AM. I HAVE MISS LINDA NEWCRM. 
          FOR THE RECORD. LONDON. MOST OF MY QUESTIONS WERE ANSWERED IN THE PRESENTATIONS, WHICH WERE EXTREMELY DETAILED. THERE WAS ONE COMMENT MADE ABOUT BATTERY STORAGE, WHICH I WOULD LIKE TO FIND OUT A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT, AND ALSO IN THE PAPERWORK THAT WAS PROVIDED, IT MENTIONED THAT THE BUSINESSES WOULD BE WORKING ON SEPTICS AND WELLS, AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF CONTROL WE NEED ON THAT. IS IT SO FAR OUT OF THAT? YOU KNOW, THAT'S REQUIRED. BUT ADDING MORE SEPTICS THAT CLOSE TO THE THE RIVER AND THE LAKE MAY BE QUESTIONABLE. THANK YOU. 
          CHLOE, SUE PARKER AND MADAM CHAIR, JUST VERY BRIEFLY, I WAS JUST GOING TO OFFER THE THOUGHT AS FOLKS, IF THEY HAVE QUESTIONS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, MY ADVICE ON THIS ONE, BECAUSE WE DO HAVE FOLKS HERE TO SPEAK. AND SO LET FOLKS GO AHEAD AND, AND, YOU KNOW, SAY WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY, ASK THEIR QUESTIONS, AND THEN THOSE CAN BE ADDRESSED WHEN PUBLIC COMMENT IS ALL DONE. SO AS MR. WADE JUST SAID, WE WILL ALLOW PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS AND MAKE THEIR PUBLIC COMMENT. AND AT THE END, THE APPLICANT WILL ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS THEY FEEL NEED THE NEED TO ADDRESS. GOOD EVENING, CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBERS. MY NAME IS CHLOE SIU AND I'M HONORED TO INTRODUCE MYSELF AS THE NEW CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOR THE ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF INDIAN TOWN. I'M HERE TODAY, THOUGH, TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROPOSED PUD ZONING AGREEMENT. ULTIMATELY, THIS IS A DECISION THAT'S ABOUT SETTING PARAMETERS FOR WHAT'S CONSIDERED IN THE FUTURE. AND ALSO IT'S A CLEAN, CLEAR FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE PUD GIVES THE VILLAGE A WHOLE FLEXIBILITY THAT REGULAR ZONING JUST DOES NOT. IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A THOUGHTFUL APPROACH, THIS IS THE WAY TO DO IT FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. INDIAN TOWN HISTORICALLY IS TIED TO INDUSTRY. SOME OF US STILL KNOW IT AS A COMPANY TOWN. AND ALSO IF WE GO BACK INTO THE HISTORY, IT WAS A TRADING POST. ORIGINALLY. STRONG INDUSTRY IS WHAT THE COMMUNITY ENDS UP FEELING. THEY FEEL IT WHEN THE EMPLOYMENT RATES RISE, WHEN SMALL BUSINESSES PROSPER, AND WHEN THE STABILITY AND THE RESIDENTS ALL FEEL THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATION OF THE COMMUNITY. 
          THE ECONOMIC COUNCIL IS FOCUSED ON SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. THAT'S GOING TO 
          [00:45:03]
HAPPEN HERE IN THE VILLAGE. THIS INCLUDES EXPANDING A TAX BASE, SUPPORTING THE LOCAL JOB CREATION, WHILE ALSO REINFORCING WHAT THIS COMMUNITY IS FOUNDED ON. THIS PUD GIVES US THE ABILITY TO HAVE THAT FLEXIBILITY TO SUSTAIN WHAT THE VILLAGE IS SUSTAINED ON. AND AND THESE GOALS THAT THE ECONOMIC COUNCIL HAS. SO ONCE AGAIN, I'M SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE ECONOMIC COUNCIL IN SUPPORT OF THIS PUD. THANK YOU. JENNY BUSSEY. HELLO. MY NAME IS JENNY BUSSEY, AND I'M A LIFETIME OR LIFELONG INDIAN TOWN RESIDENT. I OWN AND OPERATE HOMETOWN CLEANING SERVICES, AND MY FAMILY HAS BEEN IN THE COMMUNITY FOR DECADES. AS A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER, I DEPEND ON WELL RESPECTED BUSINESSES LIKE FPL, BRINGING MORE OPPORTUNITIES TO OUR AREA WHICH SUPPORTS BUSINESSES LIKE MINE. I'M OUT HERE EVERY DAY WORKING AND WHEN THERE'S MORE ACTIVITY, MORE JOBS AND MORE INVESTMENTS IN THE COMMUNITY, THAT TRICKLES DOWN TO SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS LIKE ME. IT MEANS MORE CUSTOMERS, MORE STEADY WORK, AND MORE STABILITY. THIS KIND OF OPPORTUNITY ISN'T JUST ABOUT BIG COMPANIES. IT'S ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE HERE, RAISE FAMILIES HERE AND ARE TRYING TO BUILD SOMETHING FOR THEMSELVES IN INDIANTOWN. FPL HAS BEEN PART OF THIS COMMUNITY FOR A LONG TIME. THEY'VE SHOWN UP, SUPPORTED LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS COUNTLESS TIMES. THAT MEANS SOMETHING WHEN YOU LIVE HERE. I JUST ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS COULD MEAN FOR THE FUTURE OF INDIANTOWN AND OUR SMALL BUSINESSES, OUR CHILDREN AND OUR FAMILIES. PLEASE SUPPORT THIS ITEM. THANK YOU. DONNA CARMEN. SORRY GUYS A LITTLE BIT. 
          DONNA CARMEN, RESIDENT OF INDIANTOWN LITTLE RANCH ESTATES. I'VE BEEN PART OF THIS COMMUNITY FOR A LONG TIME. AS MANY OF YOU ON THIS COMMITTEE HAVE AS WELL. I'VE SEEN INDIANTOWN THROUGH A LOT OF DIFFERENT SEASONS, AND I CARE DEEPLY ABOUT WHERE WE'RE HEADED. 
          I'VE SEEN WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE WHEN ORGANIZATIONS TRULY SHOW UP FOR COMMUNITY, NOT JUST ONCE, BUT OVER TIME. FPL HAS DONE THAT HERE IN INDIANTOWN SINCE THE EARLY 80S. THEY'VE SUPPORTED OUR LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS, OUR INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE FOLKS WHO LIVE HERE. THAT KIND OF COMMITMENT MATTERS IN A SMALL TOWN LIKE OURS. FOR ME, THIS REALLY COMES DOWN TO MAKING SURE WE'RE CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR OUR FOLKS WHO LIVE HERE, FOR OUR FAMILIES, FOR OUR SMALL BUSINESSES, AND FOR THE NEXT GENERATION GROWING UP HERE. VERY CRUCIAL. WE ALL WANT A STRONG INDIAN TOWN. WE WANT GOOD JOBS, A STABLE TAX BASE FOR EMPLOYMENT, IMPORTANT, EXCUSE ME, AND A COMMUNITY THAT CAN GROW TO TO GROW WITHOUT LOSING WHAT MAKES IT SPECIAL. WE'VE ALL HEARD OF A LOT OF DIFFERENT OPINIONS, AND THAT'S PART OF LIVING IN A CLOSE COMMUNITY. BUT IT'S IMPORTANT TO SORRY THAT WE DON'T LET ASSUMPTIONS AND SOME MISINFORMATION GET AHEAD OF THE ACTUAL FACTS. THIS APPROACH GIVES US A CHANCE TO KEEP ASKING QUESTIONS, AND IT'S VERY IMPORTANT. I'VE ENJOYED THE CONVERSATIONS, KEEP REVIEWING THE DETAILS, AND MAKE SURE ANYTHING THAT COMES FORWARD IS DONE CAREFULLY IN A WAY THAT FITS OUR COMMUNITY. AT THE END OF THE DAY, I JUST WANT TO SEE OUR COMMUNITY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GROW IN A WAY THAT BENEFITS EVERYONE WHO LIVES HERE. I RESPECTFULLY ASK THE BOARD TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM SO IT CAN CONTINUE TO MOVE THROUGH THE RIGHT PROCESS AND BE REVIEWED FURTHER BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ERIC MILLER. GOOD EVENING, FOLKS. I'D JUST LIKE TO START OUT BY SAYING THAT WE HAVE PUBLICLY CALLED FOR THE RECUSAL OF TWO OF THE PEOPLE THAT ARE ON THIS PANEL, FOR THE OBVIOUS REASON THAT WAS JUST SHOWN BY THE CEO OF THE INDIAN TOWN OR THE ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF INDIAN TOWN, THERE ARE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE ECONOMIC INDIAN TOWN COUNCIL FLIES PEOPLE GRATIS. AS A TRIP TO LONDON TO LOOK AT DATA CENTERS. 
          ANYWAY, FPL HAS BEEN AND WILL BE. SINCE YOU'RE NOT RECUSING, WE ARE FILING STATE CHARGES ETHICS CHARGES ON ON FORM 50 FOR THAT FPL HAS BEEN A GOOD MEMBER TO THIS COMMUNITY UP UNTIL THESE PROJECTS. NOW THEY'RE HIDING BEHIND NDAS. THEY'RE NOT TALKING TO PEOPLE, BUT PEOPLE LIKE THE INDIAN TOWN ECONOMIC COUNCIL ARE TALKING TO THE PLAYERS AND THE PEOPLE WITH THE VOTES, TELLING THEM NOT TO WORRY, THAT EVERYTHING'S GOING TO BE FINE. THEY'RE THE GOLD STANDARD. THIS DATA CENTER THAT FPL WANTS TO PUT IN IS GOING TO BE GOLD STANDARD. WELL, IF IT'S SUCH GOLD STANDARD AND YOU WANT TO WORK WITH THE COMMUNITY FPL YOU'RE HERE TONIGHT, ARE YOU WILLING TO SIT DOWN AT A TABLE AND USE SENATE BILL 484 AS A FRAMEWORK TO POSTPONE ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR DATA CENTERS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT A COMMUNITY REVIEW PROCESS CAN 
          [00:50:02]
TAKE PLACE. TO USE SENATE BILL 484 TO ENHANCE THE UN STRUCTURED CODE THAT EXISTS. 
          SEE, THE CODE HERE. ONLY HANDLES BUILDINGS UP TO 500,000. YOU'RE ASKING FOR SOMETHING 2 MILLION. THIS CODE DOESN'T HANDLE THINGS LIKE ULTRASOUND, THE GRADES OF OF OF RECORDING THE SOUND AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES. THEY'RE NOT THERE. THE EPA AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AREN'T GOING TO DO IT. SO WE WANT TIGHTER STANDARDS LIKE METERING. 
          HOW MUCH WATER ARE YOU GOING TO USE? OKAY, THESE ARE SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ANSWERED. AND IF YOU ARE THE GOOD COMMUNITY PARTNERS THAT YOU HAVE BEEN IN THE PAST, BECAUSE YOU WERE REALLY GOOD TO US AS THE INDIAN TOWN VETERANS ASSOCIATION, BUT THAT WAS WHEN YOU NEEDED SOMETHING FROM US. YOU CAME TO US AND YOU QUELLED OUR FEARS. YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING FOR THIS COMMUNITY TO DATE TO QUELL ANY FEARS, BUT TO CALL PEOPLE THAT SAY THAT THIS IS HAPPENING LIARS. AND THAT'S NOT GOOD. NEIGHBORS. I'M SORRY. SO AGAIN, I ASK, IN THE INTEREST OF UNITY, ARE WE WILLING TO POSTPONE ANY DATA CENTERS IN INDIAN TOWN FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALL INVOLVED, SITTING AT A TABLE AND USING YOUR GOLD STANDARD, YOUR GOLD STANDARD THAT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO TAKE AND EAT TO UPDATE OUR ELDERS LIKE SENATE BILL 484 ALLOWS US TO DO. THAT'S MY QUESTION, MADAM CHAIR. THANK YOU. SALLY KAMINSKI. I EXCUSE ME. MY NAME IS SALLY KAMINSKI. GOOD EVENING. I CAME HERE FROM NEW JERSEY. I'VE BEEN CALLED JERSEY HERE AND. I CAME HERE 12 YEARS AGO. AND THIS IS MY NEW HOME BEING IN JERSEY, WE WENT THROUGH SIMILAR THINGS. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE HEARD OF ERIN BROCKOVICH. WELL, THAT WAS WITH PSU, WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO FPL. AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU SAW THE MOVIE, BUT THEY HAVE TO HAVE THINGS IN PLACE THAT SAY, WELL, WHAT IF THERE WAS A FIRE? WHO'S GOING TO GET THE WATER FIRST? WHAT ABOUT THE GLOBAL WARMING YOU'RE PUTTING UPON THIS COMMUNITY THAT YOU SO LOVE? I'M NOT A SOLAR PANEL PERSON BECAUSE YOU CAN'T EAT THEM, BUT I. SO YOU HAVE A SOLAR PANEL. 
          BUT I AGREE WITH MR. MILLER, AND ALL WE'RE ASKING IS FOR A SEAT AT THE TABLE THAT WE WERE NEVER GIVEN. AND EVERYBODY CLAIMS TO LOVE THIS TOWN. I DON'T SEE IT. I DON'T SEE YOU KNOW WHAT I SEE A BUNCH OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BUSINESSES. AND IN BACK IN 2025, YOU HAVE THE I SEE, WOW, OKAY, WHERE ARE THE SUNSHINE LAWS FOR THAT ONE? THERE'S JUST SO MUCH GOING ON GOING ON. AND I THINK IF YOU JUST PAUSE AND GIVE THE COMMUNITY A LITTLE TIME TO, TO. 
          CATCH UP, BECAUSE OUR STUFF IS NOT MISINFORMATION, THEY ARE NOT LIES. WE HAVE A LOT OF THINGS AND I'M SURE YOU ALL KNOW IT. YOU ASK. AI, AI, CAN YOU TELL ME ABOUT THE OH, AI EVEN TELLS YOU HOW BAD THIS IS. BUT IF PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO SIT DOWN AND WE'RE JUST LOOKING FOR A PAUSE, SOMEBODY TO MAKE A MOTION AND SECOND AND JUST PAUSE. THANK YOU. LINDA BISCO. 
          GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. MY NAME IS LINDA BISCO. I LIVE IN CLEMENTSVILLE. I HEAR EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT THE THE ZONE CHANGE. THE ZONE CHANGES WHEN WHEN YOU'RE CHANGING CODES. 
          THERE'S NOT A RIGHT TO A CODE CHANGE. THE CODE CHANGES ARE. YOU CAN'T JUST BUY A PIECE OF AGRICULTURE LAND AND THEN ASK TO HAVE IT CHANGED AND EXPECT FOR IT JUST TO BE CHANGED. 
          THERE'S NO RIGHT OR GUARANTEE TO THAT. AND YOUR JOB IS TO KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING. 
          THERE'S A REASON WHY CERTAIN AREAS ARE ZONED THE WAY THEY ARE, AND AND IT'S LINED UP WITH 
          [00:55:05]
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SAYS TO KEEP IT RURAL. AND WHEN YOU'RE ANNEXING SO MUCH LAND TO INDUSTRIAL, YOU NOW HAVE 43% OF THIS TOWN INDUSTRIAL. I THINK WHEN THE THE 57, 22 ACRES WERE ANNEXED IN. I'M SORRY, I DIDN'T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TALK ABOUT IT BEFORE. MY HUSBAND WAS IN THE HOSPITAL, BUT I THINK IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ZONED SEPARATELY. I DON'T THINK 5722 ACRES SHOULD HAVE BEEN ZONED INDUSTRIAL IN THIS. IN THIS LITTLE TOWN. I HEARD ONE OF THE SPEAKERS TALK ABOUT AN INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR. I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD BE AN INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR, NOT WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT JUST IT JUST BOTHERS ME THAT IT WAS CALLED AN INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR. AND THE OTHER THING I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT WAS, WAS FPL POWER GENERATION PLANTS. WE ALREADY HAVE ONE THAT'S POLLUTING OUR OUR COMMUNITY. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 47 MILLION TONS OF CARBON DIOXIDE IN THE LAST TEN YEARS FROM THIS PLANT. WE ALREADY HAVE 10,000 TONS OF NITROGEN OXIDES, 198 TONS OF AMMONIA OVER THE PAST DECADE. THAT'S A LOT OF POLLUTION. NOW YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT ANOTHER POWER GENERATION PLANT, MAYBE TWO EACH DATA CENTER, WHICH WE KNOW THERE'S TWO ALREADY. AND NOW WE BELIEVE THE THIRD, THE PROJECT PARROT. THEY'RE ALL SUPPOSED TO HAVE THEIR OWN POWER GENERATION. YOU THINK THE DATA CENTERS ARE BAD NOW YOU'RE YOU'RE PILING THAT ON TOP. 
          POWER GENERATION IS JUST AS BAD AS THE DATA CENTERS. THEY USE A LOT OF WATER. THEY'RE NOISY. 
          THEY'RE A DRAIN ON THE RESOURCES. AND I KNOW WE NEED IT. BUT IF WE DON'T HAVE THESE DATA CENTERS, WE DON'T NEED THE EXTRA POWER GENERATION. THANK YOU. ROSARIO MARTINEZ. HEY, GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. I'M ROSARIA, I'M UP HERE TODAY FOR OBVIOUS REASONS BECAUSE OF DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSIONS. I SUPPORT THE BUSINESSES AND, YOU KNOW, REALTY AND ALL THIS DEVELOPMENT. BUT THERE'S A LOT MORE OTHER SPOTS TO TRY TO DEVELOP THIS FPL FACTORY THAT YOU GUYS WANT TO BUILD. THIS IS A TOWN, THIS IS NOT A CITY. AND THERE IS A LOT MORE PROBLEMS IN TOWN THAN TO BE GIVING ALL THE NEW RESOURCES JUST FOR THAT FACTORY. WHAT ABOUT THE RESOURCES FOR THE PEOPLE THAT ARE ALREADY HERE? LIKE, IT'S A SHAME THAT YOU WANT TO GIVE THIS BUILDING NEW ELECTRICITY RESOURCES, NEW WATER, LIKE NEW AC. I DEFINITELY THINK THIS FACTORY ISN'T THE SPOT FOR TOWN. IT'S OUT OF TOWN'S LEAGUE AND. YEAH, I DEFINITELY THINK THIS IS JUST CRAZY SOMETIMES. LIKE, I CAN'T REALLY BELIEVE THIS IS EVEN GOING ON, THAT THE PEOPLE THAT RUN INDIAN TOWN, YOU KNOW, HAVE LET TERRA LAGO COME IN AND THESE TWO OTHER COMMUNITIES. 
          BUT, YOU KNOW, IT'S LIKE A WAKE UP CALL FOR EVERYBODY NOW TO COME TOGETHER AS A COMMUNITY AND REALIZE WHAT'S HAPPENING IN FRONT OF OUR FACES AND JUST LETTING THEM, YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY RUN US OVER, I GUESS. BUT I JUST FEEL LIKE ANY TOWN JUST BEING USED, AND I THINK INDIAN TOWN DESERVES A LOT MORE RESPECT THAN JUST TO BE COME THROUGH AND RAN THROUGH. LIKE, THIS AREA IS LIKE THIS FOR A REASON. IT'S NOT A PLACE TO JUST COME DUMP A FACTORY HERE JUST SO IT CAN BE USED. AND IT'S NOT EVEN BENEFICIAL TO ANYBODY HERE. IT'S JUST GOING TO DEGRADE ANY IN TOWN AS IT IS. AND THE PEOPLE THAT ARE HERE, YOU'RE SAYING THAT THERE'S EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. PEOPLE ALREADY WORK OUT OF TOWN. LIKE THIS IS NOT A JOB THAT'S GOING TO BE ENTRY LEVEL. YOU HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL FOR IT. AND YEAH, THAT'S JUST A WHOLE NOTHER THING. BUT I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY COMING OUT HERE TODAY. I APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS, I RESPECT IT, I LOVE THE BUSINESSES, BUT I DEFINITELY THINK YOU SHOULD LOOK INTO ANOTHER LAND. LIKE THERE'S A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER LAND AROUND HERE. LIKE ANY TOWN IS NOT A THANK YOU. JENNIFER LONGSHORE. GOOD EVENING. BEAR WITH ME. I'VE RECENTLY BEEN 
          [01:00:04]
SICK, SO MY VOICE IS A LITTLE SHODDY. FOR THE RECORD, I'M JENNIFER LONGSHORE AND I SERVE AS THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE INDIAN TOWN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. IN MY SORRY, IN MY ROLE, I WORK CLOSELY WITH LOCAL BUSINESSES, RESIDENTS AND COMMUNITY LEADERS HERE IN INDIANTOWN. AND I SEE EVERY DAY HOW IMPORTANT PLANNING IS TO THE FUTURE OF OUR VILLAGE. 
          RESPECTFULLY, I URGE YOU ALL TO SUPPORT FPL'S PUD ZONING AGREEMENT. FPL HAS BEEN A STRONG, LONG STANDING COMMUNITY PARTNER HERE IN INDIANTOWN AND HAS REGULARLY SUPPORTED LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVES, FROM THE SCHOOLS TO COMMUNITY EVENTS TO PLACES LIKE INDIANTOWN VETERANS ASSOCIATION. WE APPRECIATE THE APPROACH OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE THIS ALLOWS OPPORTUNITY TO ESTABLISH GUARDRAILS AND WORK DIRECTLY WITH OUR VILLAGE STAFF TO DEVELOP THE BEST POSSIBLE PLAN FOR INDIANTOWN. WE TRUST THEY WILL PUT TOGETHER A PLAN THAT WILL BENEFIT OUR ENTIRE COMMUNITY, NOT JUST FOR OUR GENERATIONAL FAMILIES, BUT FOR FUTURE FAMILIES. ALSO. I ASK FOR APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM SO IT CAN CONTINUE THROUGH THE PROPER PROCESS AND BE CONSIDERED FURTHER BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. 
          THANK YOU. JOSH KELLUM. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. JOSH KELLUM, CEO OF THE GARCIA COMPANIES, DEVELOPER OF TERRA LAGO COMMUNITY DOWN THE STREET, AND SOMEBODY THAT HAS GROWN TO LOVE THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. AND I CAN STAND UP HERE IN FRONT OF YOU ALL AND CONFIDENTLY SAY THAT. AND I THINK I'VE MET EACH ONE OF YOU ALL. AND WE'VE WORKED ON A NUMBER OF ISSUES TOGETHER. AND AS THIS ISSUE COMES FORTH, WE'VE HEARD A LOT OF GOOD COMMENTS TONIGHT ABOUT THE TRUSTED PARTNERSHIP IN FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, AND I WANT TO ADD TO THAT, I WANT TO SUPPORT THE PUD AMENDMENT TONIGHT, BUT I WANT TO TALK ABOUT A TRUSTED PARTNER THAT'S BEEN IN THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN FOR A VERY, VERY LONG TIME, SOMEBODY THAT HAS CREATED JOBS, SOMEBODY THAT HAS CREATED ECONOMIC GROWTH, SOMEBODY THAT HAS BROUGHT FIRST CLASS OPERATIONS TO EVERYTHING THAT THEY HAVE DONE IN THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, SOMEBODY THAT PUT THEIR MONEY WHERE THEIR MOUTH WAS AND BOUGHT AN OLD ANTIQUATED COAL PLANT AND SHOT IT DOWN AND TORE IT DOWN. SOMEBODY THAT HAS INVESTED INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN THAT CARES ABOUT THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, JUST LIKE WE CARE ABOUT THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. 
          AND WE HAVE INVESTED SIGNIFICANT MONEY INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN AND TRYING TO BRING DEVELOPMENT IN THE RIGHT WAY, TRYING TO BRING ATTAINABILITY FOR PEOPLE OF INDIAN TOWN TO BE ABLE TO BUY HOUSES, TO BE ABLE TO AFFORD HOMES. AND WITH THE INVESTMENT THAT WE HAVE MADE IN THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, WE NOW ARE IN HEIGHTENED AWARENESS AND IN INVESTIGATION OF WHAT'S TO COME TO INDIANTOWN BECAUSE OF OUR PASSION FOR INDIANTOWN AND OUR INVESTMENT IN INDIANTOWN, WE CARE ABOUT WHAT COMES TO INDIANTOWN, WE CARE ABOUT THE BUSINESSES AND EVERY BUSINESS THAT HAS COME TO THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN SINCE OUR INVESTMENT IN 2020, WE HAVE SAT DOWN WITH, HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH, TRIED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH WITH INDIANTOWN, AND DOES IT ALIGN WITH INDIAN TOWN'S VISION AND MISSION? AND IF WE'RE GOING TO SIT AT THE TABLE WITH A PARTNER THAT'S GOING TO BRING ECONOMIC GROWTH TO INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHTS. ONE OF THE PARTNERS THAT I WANT TO SIT WITH, THEY'RE SOMEBODY THAT IS NOT GOING TO INVEST IN THE COMMUNITY, THAT'S GOING TO BRING SOMEBODY THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE STATE OF THE ART, NO MATTER WHAT IT IS, WHETHER IT'S ELECTRICAL GENERATION, WHETHER IT'S SUBSTATIONS, WHETHER IT'S SOLAR ENERGY, WHETHER IT'S DATA CENTER, WHETHER WHATEVER IT MAY BE, THEY'RE GOING TO PUT THEIR NAME BEHIND WHOEVER IS THE BEST OF THE BEST. AND SO I STAND HERE ASKING YOU ALL TO SUPPORT THE PASSAGE OF THIS PUD AMENDMENT AND TO MAKE SURE WE CONTINUE TO ALIGN THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN WITH PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO INVEST IN THE PEOPLE OF INDIANTOWN FIRST AND FOREMOST, BEFORE GOING OUTSIDE. 
          SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. BRIAN POWERS. THANK YOU, BRIAN POWERS. FOR THE RECORD, I'LL SAY FIRST, IT'S AN HONOR TO BE HERE BEFORE YOU. YOU KNOW, IT WAS PART OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT FOUGHT LIKE HELL. SO WE COULD HAVE THIS CONVERSATION IN THIS ROOM AND NOT HAVE TO GO TO THE COUNTY TO TALK TO A GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT NEVER REALLY CARED. SO IT'S AN ABSOLUTE 
          [01:05:05]
HONOR. AND FOR, I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE, IT SEEMS LIKE A LOT OF LAND AND WE DON'T REALLY KNOW. RIGHT. BUT I THINK IT'S HELPFUL AT A TIME LIKE THIS TO FOCUS ON WHAT WE DO KNOW. YOU KNOW, FOR MORE THAN 30 YEARS, WE'VE HAD A HALF 1,000,000FT■S OF CHICKEN FARM HOUSES. THEY HAVE 20 FANS PER BUILDING. THAT'S OVER 300 FANS. NOBODY EVER HEARD THEM. THE LAND THAT THIS IS SITUATED ON IS A FORMER CITRUS GROVE AT 120 TREES PER ACRE. THAT'S ABOUT 4800 GALLONS PER ACRE PER DAY. THAT'S OVER 24 MILLION GALLONS. NOW, THEY DIDN'T USE IT EVERY DAY, BUT THAT'S ONLY 3 TO 4 DAYS A WEEK. PLUS, THEY USE COPPER SULFATE FOR FERTILIZERS. THEY USE THINGS LIKE ROUNDUP. PRETTY SURE WE WON'T HAVE ISSUES LIKE THAT WITH A DATA CENTER. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS KNOW THIS, BUT THE FPL MARTIN PLANT THAT WE HAVE NOW THAT IS PRODUCING POWER EVERY SINGLE DAY. COMBINED CYCLE UNITS ARE LITERALLY JET ENGINES. I DON'T THINK ANYBODY IN THIS ROOM HAS EVER SAID, I'VE HEARD THE GENERATING UNITS AT THE POWER PLANT. I THINK THAT'S A TREND THAT, HOWEVER THIS IS BUILT, WE CAN CONTINUE TO EXPECT. BEYOND THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN I THINK ABOUT FPL AS A PARTNER, WE HAVE THINGS TODAY. THE CIVIC CENTER NEXT DOOR WOULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED. IT WAS VERY CLOSE TO BEING DEMOLISHED WHEN THEY STEPPED UP TO SAY, WE'LL REHAB IT INTO WHAT IT IS TODAY. SO AND THAT WAS LONG BEFORE THEY NEEDED ANYTHING. THAT WAS 40 YEARS AGO. ALSO, THE CAREER CENTER THAT'S ACROSS FROM THE Y. 
          THEY PUT ALL THE MONEY INTO THAT. THEY DIDN'T LOOK FOR A PARTNER OR ANYTHING ELSE. IN ADDITION, THEY ARE THE CHARTER MEMBERS AND CO FOUNDERS OF THE INDIAN TOWN EDUCATION COALITION THAT HAS GIVEN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IN SCHOLARSHIPS SINCE THEN. BEYOND GOOD NEIGHBORS, THEY'RE GOOD PARTNERS. I'D GET IT IF THIS WAS SOMEBODY WE NEVER KNEW, BUT THIS IS SOMEBODY THAT HAS PROVEN THAT THEY CAN BE TRUSTED. AS THE P AND P IMPLIES, THIS IS REALLY ABOUT WHETHER THIS HAPPENS WITH A PLAN. WITHOUT A PLAN. I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT YOU GET A CHANCE TO DOWN ZONE OR DOWNSIZE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE BY 250 X, NOT 250% 250 TIMES TO GO FROM A HALF 1 BILLION TO 2. TAKE THAT ANY DAY YOU CAN GET IT. AND THEY'RE PUTTING IN WRITING THAT THERE WILL NEVER BE RESIDENTIAL ON THERE. I DON'T THINK YOU'LL EVER GET A BETTER DEAL THAN THAT. AND I ENCOURAGE YOU TO MOVE IT ON. THANK YOU. SO THAT'S ALL, MADAM CHAIR. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, WE WILL I WILL ASK THE BOARD IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS THAT THEY'D LIKE TO ASK. BUT BEFORE WE DO THAT, I DO HAVE SOMETHING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SAY. I FIRST LIKE TO THANK THE ADMINISTRATION AND STAFF. I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT'S GONE INTO THIS APPLICATION AND THE APPLICANT'S WILLINGNESS TO INVEST IN OUR COMMUNITY. I SUPPORT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WHEN IT'S THOUGHTFUL, RESPONSIBLE AND ALIGNED WITH LONG TERM INTERESTS OF INDIAN TOWN. AT THE SAME TIME, THIS IS NOT A SHORT TERM REQUEST. THIS IS A LONG DURATION ZONING AGREEMENT WITH SIGNIFICANT FLEXIBILITY FOR FUTURE PHASES. 
          ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS IN A BROAD RANGE OF POTENTIAL INDUSTRIAL USES. BECAUSE OF THAT, I BELIEVE OUR RESPONSIBILITY TONIGHT IS TO LOOK BEYOND THE INITIAL CONCEPT AND CONSIDER HOW THIS PROJECT FUNCTIONS OVER TIME. MY PRIMARY CONCERNS ARE STRAIGHTFORWARD UTILITY CAPACITY, INFRASTRUCTURE, TIMING, FUTURE PUBLIC OVERSIGHT, AND COMPATIBILITY WITH NEARBY PROPERTIES AND RESIDENTS GROWTH SHOULD NOT OUTPACE ROADS, DRAINAGE, WATER, WASTEWATER CAPACITY OR EMERGENCY SERVICES. NOR SHOULD MAJOR FUTURE CHANGES OCCUR WITHOUT CLEAR STANDARDS AND TRANSPARENCY. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT WHERE PUBLIC BENEFITS ARE SITED IN SUPPORT OF A PROJECT, THOSE BENEFITS SHOULD BE MEASURABLE AND ENFORCEABLE, NOT SIMPLY ASPIRATIONAL. IF THIS PROJECT IS EXPECTED TO BRING JOBS, MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS, BUFFERING AND COMMUNITY VALUE, THEN THOSE COMMITMENTS SHOULD BE SHOULD BE CLEAR IN THE AGREEMENT. I WANT TO BE CLEAR. I AM NOT OPPOSED TO DEVELOPMENT. 
          I AM IN FAVOR OF RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT THAT PROTECTS TAXPAYERS, RESPECTS RESIDENTS AND GIVES THE VILLAGE CONFIDENCE THAT FUTURE IMPACTS ARE PROPERLY MANAGED. FOR THAT REASON, MY SUPPORT WOULD DEPEND ON CONDITIONS THAT STRENGTHEN UTILITY PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE, TRIGGERS, OVERSIGHT THRESHOLDS AND COMPATIBILITY PROTECTIONS. WITH THOSE SAFEGUARDS, THIS PROJECT COULD MOVE IN A MORE BALANCED DIRECTION. WITHOUT THEM, I BELIEVE ADDITIONAL WORK 
          [01:10:01]
MAY STILL BE NEEDED. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION ON. I'M SORRY, DO I NOT DO THAT? SORRY. ON PAGE 99, MISS WILLIAMSON. SORRY. YEAH. TURN IT ON RIGHT THERE. OH, SORRY. AND GET IT CLOSE TO YOU SO EVERYBODY CAN HEAR YOU. THERE YOU GO. CAN YOU PULL THE MICROPHONE CLOSER? SORRY. YES. ON THE AGENDA PACKET, THERE'S A SECTION THAT HAS SOME CLARIFICATION. THERE'S SOME SECTIONS ON THE AGENDA PACKET SPECIFICALLY. REGARDING. I'M TRYING TO FIND IT. SORRY, IT'S ON PAGE 99. COMMUNITY COORDINATION AND TRANSPARENCY. 
          IT SAYS DATA USE SUBSEQUENTLY DEFINED DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PROJECT IS COMMITTED TO ONGOING COORDINATION WITH THE VILLAGE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS WITHIN THE PROJECT. 
          DATA USE OWNER SHALL ESTABLISH A LOCAL POINT OF CONTACT FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND ITS OPERATIONS AND DATA USE. APPLICANTS SHALL CONDUCT PUBLIC OUTREACH FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DATA USE. APPLICANT SHALL IMPLEMENT ONGOING OPERATIONAL MONITORING AND PROVIDE A MECHANISM FOR ADDRESSING COMMUNITY CONCERNS RELATED TO NOISE AND OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACTS. THERE'S ALSO SECTIONS THAT AND INCORPORATE THEIR SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE, COMMUNITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTIONS, WATER CONSERVATION, THE DOCUMENT. THE WHOLE AGENDA PACKET IS 492 PAGES. IT'S A LOT. SO THERE ARE, FROM WHAT I'M UNDERSTANDING IN THE PUD AGREEMENT, THERE ARE ALREADY THOSE SAFEGUARDS IN PLACE. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. IS A DRAFT ZONING AGREEMENT. SORRY. THEY'VE BEEN INCLUDED AS CONDITIONS. AND MY NEXT QUESTION WAS IN REGARDS TO THE ZONING AND THE LIGHT OR THE LIGHT, THE STRAIGHT ZONING FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OR THE PUD. 
          THE DIFFERENCE IS ESSENTIALLY THEY'RE ENTERING INTO A PLAN. AND EACH STEP OF THAT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS HAS TO THEN COME BEFORE US AGAIN, CORRECT. THE. SO IN THE ZONING AGREEMENT AND AND IT MIRRORS THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. AND. DEENA FREEMAN, FOR THE RECORD, THERE IS A PROVISION WITHIN THE PUD ZONING AGREEMENT. AND IT'S ALSO MIRRORING WHAT'S IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT THE SITE PLANS WOULD BE DEALT WITH ADMINISTRATIVELY. 
          OKAY. I THINK THAT SORRY. I THINK THAT WE SHOULD ALL BE MINDFUL OF THE LOCAL ECONOMY HERE. THE CONSENSUS, OUR LATEST CONSENSUS SHOWS CENSUS SHOWS THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY AT 23% POVERTY HERE IN INDIANTOWN 34956 ZIP CODE. THAT'S HERE US NOT PORT SAINT LUCIE, NOT THAT'S US. THAT'S TWO TIMES THE NATIONAL AVERAGE. AND I'M NOT OKAY WITH THAT. I DON'T THINK ANY OF US SHOULD BE OKAY WITH KNOWING THAT 23 OUT OF 100 PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY ARE LIVING BELOW POVERTY LEVEL. OUR SCHOOLS ARE TITLE ONE. WE SHOULDN'T BE OKAY WITH THAT. WE SHOULD NOT BE PROUD THAT OUR SCHOOLS ARE TITLE ONE. WE SHOULD NOT BE PROUD THAT INDIAN TOWN IS AN OPPORTUNITY ZONE. WE'RE DESIGNATED THESE THINGS BECAUSE WE NEED RESCUING. 
          SOMEONE IS GOING TO HAVE TO RESCUE INDIAN TOWN. OUR ECONOMY DEPENDS ON IT, WHETHER IT'S FPL OR ANOTHER INVESTOR THAT COMES HERE AND WANTS TO BRING INDUSTRY AND JOBS FOR OUR COMMUNITY. EVERY SINGLE MORNING AT 6:00, IT'S MASS EXODUS OF INDIAN TOWN. HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE ARE LEAVING TO WORK, MY HUSBAND INCLUDED. I DID IT FOR YEARS. MY FAMILY'S BEEN HERE FOR DECADES. MY MOM IS 74 YEARS OLD NEXT FRIDAY. SHE'S LIVED HERE SINCE SHE WAS FOUR. THEY'VE ALL HAD TO LEAVE TOWN FOR WORK. FAMILY, FRIENDS ALL HAVE LEFT OVER THE DECADES AS INDUSTRY HAS COME AND GONE AND COME AND GONE, AND WE'VE ALL FELT THE EFFECTS OF IT. THE ONES THAT HAVE BEEN HERE, THE FAMILIES THAT HAVE LIVED HERE FOREVER. AND I THINK INDIAN TOWN DESERVES BETTER THAN THAT. THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU. ARE WE OPEN FOR DISCUSSION? YEAH. OKAY. 
          [01:15:06]
DO I NEED TO PUSH THE BUTTON OR AM I GOOD? NO. OKAY. WE'RE HERE TONIGHT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT A PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND MAJOR SITE PLAN. THERE'S A COUPLE OPTIONS. FPL HAS, AND ONE IS JUST TO COME IN WITH STRAIGHT ZONING, WHICH ALLOWS MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF SQUARE FEET. THEY HAVE PROJECTED TO COME IN AND USE, I GUESS, LESS THAN ONE HALF OF 1% OF THE ALLOWABLE DENSITY ON THAT PROPERTY. I WANT EVERYBODY TO THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A SECOND. THAT IS AN INCREDIBLE. APPROACH. I THINK THAT FPL IS TAKING ON THIS, THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE VAST AMOUNTS OF EMPTY LAND. WITH THAT SAID, ONE THING NOBODY'S TALKED ABOUT IS WHAT THIS IS GOING TO DO FOR THE TAX BASE OF INDIANTOWN. THERE'LL BE MILLIONS, IF NOT BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TAX BASE ADDED TO INDIANTOWN. I'M GOING TO TELL YOU SOMETHING. WHEN WE INCORPORATED INDIANTOWN, WE HAD ABOUT A $2 BILLION TAX BASE. 
          THE NEXT CLOSEST WAS A JUPITER ISLAND BELOW US, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, WAS THE CITY OF STUART. 
          BUT YOU KNOW WHERE THAT $2 BILLION IN TAX BASE CAME FROM? 95% OF IT CAME FROM THE VALUE OF FPL POWER GENERATION PLANT. IT'S AN INCREDIBLE NUMBER. WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS TO BECOME THE RICHEST CITY IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, WITHOUT QUESTION, BECAUSE OUR TAX BASE IS GOING TO INCREASE EXPONENTIALLY BECAUSE OF PROJECTS LIKE THIS. 
          SO ALL THE WISHES AND THINGS THAT WE'D LIKE TO HAVE IN INDIANTOWN, WE'LL HAVE THE MONEY TO DO IT. YOU KNOW, WHEN WE INCORPORATED SOME OF THE THINGS WE SAID WE WOULD TRY TO DO IS OBVIOUSLY PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING, I BELIEVE TERRA LAGO AND THE REST. THE GUYS HAVE TRIED REAL HARD TO PRODUCE A PRODUCT THAT PEOPLE IN INDIANTOWN CAN AFFORD. 
          ANOTHER THING WAS YOUTH ATHLETICS. VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN PUT ZERO MONEY INTO YOUTH ATHLETICS. ZERO MONEY. I TRIED TO PUT TOGETHER THE INDIANTOWN COMMUNITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION BEFORE COVID HIT. WE. WE HAD IT GOING. BUT THIS WILL BE THE MECHANISM. THIS WILL PROVIDE THE MONEY SO THAT THE VILLAGE AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS CAN MAKE THINGS HAPPEN IN INDIANTOWN. YOU WANT A NEW WATER PLANT, YOU WANT TO DO A SEWER PLANT FOR PEOPLE? FORGET ABOUT THAT. BEFORE WE INCORPORATED, WE WERE IN DESPERATE TROUBLE. WE HAD ONE PUMP AT THE WATER PLANT WORKING ONE OUT OF THREE. IT WAS A DISASTER. AND THANK GOD WE INCORPORATED IN IN PEOPLE LIKE THE TERROR GROUP AND HAVE LOBBIED THE STATE AND BROUGHT IN UNGODLY AMOUNT OF MONEY TO THIS VILLAGE IN ORDER TO IMPROVE IT. WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH THIS INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S GOING TO BE BUILT BY FPL AND SO ON AND SO FORTH, WILL INCREASE OUR TAX BASE TREMENDOUSLY. THE DENSITY IS MINUSCULE COMPARED TO WHAT IT COULD BE. WHAT WE'RE HERE TO TALK ABOUT TODAY IS WHETHER TO ACCEPT OR REJECT A PUD AGREEMENT. THE OTHER OPTION APPEAL HAS OF THAT IS TO COME IN WITH STRAIGHT ZONING. YOU UNDERSTAND THERE'S A WE'RE NOT A LOT OF THESE THINGS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ARE GOOD THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, BUT THEY'RE NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE HERE TONIGHT. AND TO ME, THIS PUD AGREEMENT IS A GIFT FROM GOD FOR INDIANTOWN. IF YOU REJECT IT OR IF WE DELAY IT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS HAVE PAID ATTENTION, BUT OUR STATE LEGISLATURE AND OUR GOVERNOR HAVE COME DOWN HARD ON MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES THAT ARE ABUSING PEOPLE'S PROPERTY RIGHTS. STATE BILL 108, STATE BILL 111080. YOU NEED TO READ THEM BECAUSE IT'S BEEN A THEY'VE GOTTEN TIRED OF PEOPLE STEPPING ON PEOPLE'S RIGHTS OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT STEPPING ON PROPERTY OWNER'S RIGHTS. IN THIS CASE, I THINK FPL IS GOING OUT OF THEIR WAY WITH THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE NOT PROPOSING ANY BUILDINGS NOW, SO WHATEVER COMES FORWARD WILL GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS. ALL THE THINGS THAT I'VE HEARD TONIGHT WILL GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS. BUT WE'RE HERE TODAY TO DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT. TO ALLOW THE CPD AND THE CPD IS AN AGREEMENT. AND THAT AGREEMENT INCLUDES A MAJOR SITE PLAN WITH A PHASING AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE HERE TO DISCUSS TONIGHT. THE ALTERNATIVE TO NOT ACCEPTING THE CPD, IN MY OPINION, IS NOT A GOOD IDEA, BECAUSE THEY COULD SIMPLY COME BACK IN UNDER STANDARD ZONING, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, WHICH HAS A MILLION USES AND HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF SQUARE FEET FROM, I THINK I HEARD OF POSSIBLE DENSITY. THEY HAVE RULED OUT THE FACT THAT THEY'RE GOING TO PUT ANY RESIDENTIAL ON THE PROPERTY. ANOTHER GIFT, AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED. SO WITH THAT SAID, I'LL BE SUPPORTING THIS STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL, AND I WILL IF I CAN, I WILL MAKE A MOTION RIGHT NOW THAT THAT THAT WE MOVE FOR STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL AND LET 
          [01:20:02]
FPL CONTINUE THE JOURNEY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYTHING? I HAVE SOMETHING I HAVE GO AHEAD. 
          I DON'T NECESSARILY I GUESS I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE, I APPRECIATE THE HOURS OF WORK THAT HAS GONE TO GET US WHERE WE ARE NOW. AS A MATTER OF FACT, TALKING WITH STAFF THIS AFTERNOON HAS SHAPED MY COMMENTS THIS EVENING AND IN TALKING WITH STAFF, I REALIZED THAT THEY WORK WITH THE TOOLS THAT THEY HAVE AND THEY ARE CHALLENGING OUR TOOLS THAT WE HAVE IN OUR ELDERS ARE CHALLENGING. THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT THE WONDERFUL PARTNERS THAT THAT WE HAVE IN OUR COMMUNITY, WORKING IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND WE APPRECIATE THEM. HOWEVER, FOR ME, I THINK THAT THERE IS A OTHER QUESTIONS HERE THAT ONCE WE LET THE GENIE OUT OF THE BOTTLE HERE, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO GO BACK IN. WE TALK ABOUT IT'S BEEN STATED SEVERAL TIMES ABOUT DEVELOPMENT OF THE FRAMEWORK IN ORDER FOR THIS TO MOVE FORWARD, AND IT WOULD SEEM LIKE A REALLY GOOD FRAMEWORK. BUT HOW CAN THE FRAMEWORK BE ADEQUATE WHEN THE FOUNDATION IS BUILT, IT'S BUILT ON IS IS LACKING AND WEAK. OUR ELDERS ARE LACKING AND WEAK IN ORDER TO DEAL WITH A THE POSSIBILITY, AND I KNOW IT'S NOT A SAID THING, BUT THE POSSIBILITY OF A HYPER DATA CENTER. I KNOW EVERYBODY CALLS IT A DATA CENTER, AND THAT'S WHAT OUR ELDERS ALLOWS FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. HOWEVER, I THINK THAT WE NEED TO GET CLARIFICATION BECAUSE I DON'T THINK WE HAVE THE CORRECT CLASSIFICATION. WE HAVE A DATA CENTER, AND SOMETHING THAT'S 2,000,000FT■S IS A HYPER DATA CENTER. AND THERE IS A DEFINITE DIFFERENCE. IT'S LIKE WHEN, IF, IF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT GOES TO WORK ON OSCEOLA STREET, IT'S DEFINITELY DIFFERENT WORKING ON OSCEOLA STREET THAN IT WOULD BE STATE ROAD. 710. YOU HAVE DIFFERENT NEEDS. A DATA CENTER IS OSCEOLA STREET. 710 IS A HYPER DATA CENTER. THERE IS DEFINITELY DIFFERENT, DEFINITELY DIFFERENT NEEDS THERE. AND AND IF THERE WASN'T, I DON'T THINK THE STATE WOULD HAVE MADE A DIFFERENTIATION WITH HOUSE BILL 484 BECAUSE IT TAKES EFFECT ON JULY THE 1ST. AND THAT DOES GIVE THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY AUTHORITY OVER YOUR ELDERS FOR LARGE LOAD CUSTOMERS. SINCE OUR ELDERS ARE DEFICIENT IN DEALING WITH THE HYPER DATA CENTER, WOULD HB4 84 TRUMP. BECAUSE I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THAT MORATORIUM, WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT OUR ELDERS. AND AND I SAY, YOU KNOW, OUR ELDERS ARE LACK AND, AND WEAK. 
          I ACTUALLY HAVE SAID THEY SUCK. SO JUST BEING HONEST HERE, WHEN I, WHEN DINA, BLESS HER HEART, WHEN DEALING WITH HER, THEY DO THEY REALLY DO. SO WOULD HB 484. WOULD THAT TRUMP THE MORATORIUM THAT YOU SAID THAT WE HAVE AND WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT THEM? JULY THE 1ST. I MEAN, THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S A QUESTION. ALSO A QUESTION ALSO A QUESTION IS WATER USAGE IN IN WATCHING WHAT'S GOING ON ELSEWHERE IN THE STATE WITH THESE SAME ISSUES, FORT MEADE, YOU KNOW, THEY THEY VOTED TO MOVE AHEAD AND THEY KIND OF GOT CALLED UP SHORT BECAUSE OF THE WATER ISSUE. AND SO THEY'RE HAVING TO REVIEW THAT. I THINK IT'S THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT OR SOMETHING. ANYWAYS, SO I THOUGHT ABOUT THAT. AND WE DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THEM ATTACHING THEMSELVES TO OUR PUBLIC UTILITIES, BECAUSE THERE'S NO WAY THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO, TO PROVIDE THAT FOR THEM. HOWEVER, THAT MEANS THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE DRILLING THEIR OWN WELL INTO THE SAME AQUIFER THAT WE USE. AND NOT ONLY THEM, BUT HOW MANY OTHERS ARE GOING TO COME ALONG BEHIND THREE, FOUR, AND EVERYONE DRILLING INTO OUR AQUIFER THAT ARE GOING TO BE USING MILLIONS OF GALLONS OF OF WATER? HOW DOES HOW DOES 
          [01:25:06]
THAT WORK? HOW ARE WE ABLE TO, TO CONTROL THAT OR GAUGE THAT? OR WHAT IS THAT GOING TO DO TO OUR AQUIFER FOR OUR UTILITIES, FOR OUR RESIDENTS? THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT I'M THINKING. 
          AND, AND GRANTED, THIS IS A WONDERFUL THING, GOLD STANDARD. I'VE HEARD THAT GOLD STANDARD, BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN EVERYBODY THAT FOLLOWS ALONG BEHIND IS GOING TO BE THE GOLD STANDARD. WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE IN PLACE WHAT IT TAKES IN ORDER TO MOVE FORWARD CORRECTLY, TO PROTECT WHAT WE HAVE. EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM LOVES INDIAN TOWN, NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. HOWEVER, WE REALLY NEED TO BE COGNIZANT OF HOW WE MOVE FORWARD AND THE TOOLS THAT WE NEED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF, NOT ONLY NOW, BUT TO MAKE THE FUTURE BETTER FOR OTHER ONES THAT COME ALONG THAT AREN'T A GOLD STANDARD. HOW ARE WE GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PROTECT OURSELVES TO ONES THAT AREN'T WILLING TO DO A PUD, THAT AREN'T GOING TO DO THOSE SAME ALLOCATIONS THAT THAT WE HAVE BEEN SO BLESSED TO, TO GET WITH THIS. THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT CONCERN ME. THAT'S THE BIGGER QUESTION. SOMETHING I WROTE DOWN HERE. WE AS A BOARD AND ALSO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, WE WALK A RAZOR'S EDGE BETWEEN RESIDENTS AND BUSINESS, TRYING TO DO THAT BALANCE, TRYING TO DO THAT BALANCE. AND WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT A BENEFIT TO ONE DOESN'T INFRINGE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE OTHER. AND IT IS HARD. 
          IT IS REALLY A HARD THING. I'M SURE SOME PEOPLE THAT SIT UP HERE HAVE LOST SOME SLEEP. I KNOW I HAVE BECAUSE WE ALL LIVE HERE. SO. YOU KNOW, I WOULD I WOULD ACTUALLY LIKE TO REQUEST CAN WE GET THE STATE'S LEGAL OPINION ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A DATA CENTER AND A DATA CENTER? BECAUSE I REALLY DON'T THINK WHAT WE HAVE IN OUR AS A DATA CENTER COVERS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO AGREE, WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DEAL WITH HERE, THAT WE ARE SO WOEFULLY INADEQUATE. AND I THINK IT'S A TOTALLY DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION. CAN WE GET A CLARIFICATION? FOR SURE. READY FOR ME TO JUMP IN? WHY NOT? ALL RIGHT. FANTASTIC. I WILL I'LL ADDRESS THAT LAST QUESTION AS PART OF MY RESPONSE. I HAD A COUPLE QUESTIONS YOU HAD IN THERE, AND I DON'T WANT TO TAKE THE MIC AWAY FROM YOU IF YOU HAVE OTHER THINGS TO SAY, BUT YOU HAD A LOT IN THERE THAT I THINK WOULD BE USEFUL TO BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN FOR THE PC, EXPLAIN FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC CONCERNING ALL THESE THINGS THAT ARE RELEVANT TO THIS. AND SO LET ME JUST EXPLAIN FIRST, AS IT'S KIND OF A BACKGROUND PRINCIPLE, A LAW THAT ACTUALLY MR. WATSON WAS REFERENCING BEFORE, IT'S CALLED SB 180. IT WAS PASSED BACK IN 2025. IT'S IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK IS FROM THE STATE THAT'S RELEVANT TO WHAT THE VILLAGE CAN DO AND QUITE FRANKLY, CAN'T DO RIGHT NOW WITH REGARD TO ITS OVERALL RULES. SO SB 180 WAS ULTIMATELY IT WAS AN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ACT RELATING TO THINGS THAT HURRICANES AND SO ON. BUT IT HAD A NUMBER OF PROVISIONS IN THERE THAT WERE RELATED TO THAT, BUT WERE OF SOME CONCERN FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WITH REGARD TO DEVELOPMENT AND OUR REGULATIONS. IT PROHIBITED THREE THINGS. ALL RIGHT. IT PROHIBITED IMPOSING ANY MORATORIUMS ON DEVELOPMENT. ALL RIGHT. IT IT. PARDON ME. YEAH. 
          IT PROHIBITED ANY MORATORIUMS ON DEVELOPMENT. IT PROHIBITED ANY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS OR LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION AMENDMENTS. SO OUR ELDERS THAT ARE MORE RESTRICTIVE OR BURDENSOME. ALL RIGHT. AND I WILL TELL YOU, THE STATE HAS INTERPRETED THAT PHRASE MORE RESTRICTIVE AND BURDENSOME VERY, VERY STRICTLY. AND THEY HAVE VERY, VERY BROADLY QUITE FRANKLY, THEY HAVE COME DOWN LIKE A TON OF BRICKS ON CITIES AND COUNTIES 
          [01:30:03]
AROUND THE STATE THAT HAVE STEPPED EVEN AN INCH OUT OF LINE WITH REGARD TO TO THEIR VIEW OF THE MEANING OF THAT LANGUAGE. AND FINALLY, THEY PROHIBITED ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE OR BURDENSOME PROCEDURES CONCERNING REVIEW, APPROVAL OR ISSUANCE OF SITE PLANS, DEVELOPMENT PERMITS OR DEVELOPMENT ORDERS. ALL RIGHT. EFFECTIVELY, THEY HAVE LOCKED THOSE IN PLACE SO THEY CANNOT BE MORE BURDENSOME OR RESTRICTIVE ALL THE WAY THROUGH OCTOBER 1ST, 2027. ALL RIGHT. THERE WAS AN EFFORT IN THE LEGISLATURE THIS SESSION TO DO SOME TWEAKS, MODIFICATIONS THAT LANGUAGE, YOU KNOW, SOFTEN THE EDGES AND SO ON. THOSE EFFORTS FAILED. IMPORTANT THING TO KEEP IN MIND, THIS NOT ONLY PROHIBITS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FROM DOING IT, EVEN IF YOU TRY TO DO IT ANYWAYS, IF IT'S PROHIBITED, IT RENDERS ANY OF THOSE ACTIONS VOID AB INITIO. SO THE LAW HAS TO TREATED AS IF YOU DIDN'T EVEN DO IT. ALL RIGHT, SO WE WE'VE GOT THAT ISSUE THERE. ALL RIGHT. THE OTHER THING I WOULD ADD ON WITH REGARD TO THE MATTER OF MAKING NEW REGULATIONS IN THE VILLAGE WITH REGARD TO DATA CENTERS OF CERTAIN CATEGORIES AND SO ON, YOU REFERENCED. SB 484, WHICH WAS PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE THIS SESSION. IT HAS NOT BEEN SIGNED BY THE GOVERNOR YET, BUT IT IS ANTICIPATED TO BE SIGNED BY THE GOVERNOR. BUT IT HAS BEEN PASSED OUT OF THE LEGISLATURE. THAT ACT. IT'S NOW AN ACT OF THE LEGISLATURE. AND THEN WHEN THE GOVERNOR SIGNS IT, IT'LL BECOME A LAW. THAT ACT DOES NOT GIVE BACK ANY POWER AT ALL. THAT WAS TAKEN AWAY BY SB 180, AND I HATE TO SAY IT, IT WAS VERY ARTFULLY DRAFTED IN THE WAY THAT LANGUAGE WAS DRAFTED. IT DID NOT GIVE BACK ANY POWER, DID NOT OVERRIDE SB 180. WE'D BE HAVING A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION IF IT DID, BUT IT ABSOLUTELY DID NOT. ALL RIGHT. NOW, ONE THING THAT IS RELEVANT WITH REGARD TO SB 484 TIES TO ANOTHER. ONE OF YOUR QUESTIONS WITH REGARD TO WATER. OKAY, ONE THING SB 444 DOES DO IS PUT IN ALL SORTS OF NEW OBLIGATIONS ON THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS. ALL RIGHT. SO WE ARE IN THE VILLAGE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, AND THEY HAVE BROAD JURISDICTION OVER MATTERS ABOUT STORMWATER DRAINAGE ON THE PROPERTY, BUT THEY ALSO HAVE BROAD JURISDICTION, REGULATORY JURISDICTION ABOUT GETTING WHAT ARE CALLED CONSUMPTIVE USE PERMITS OR CUPS, GETTING THE RIGHT FROM THE STATE TO DRILL AND TAKE WATER OUT OF THE GROUND. ALL RIGHT. IT IS THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT THAT HAS THAT RESPONSIBILITY TO MANAGE THE AMOUNT OF WATER THAT'S GETTING TAKEN OUT OF THE GROUND IN AN AREA THAT'S ONE OF THEIR CORE FUNCTIONS. AND WHAT THIS LAW DID WAS PUT NEW EMPHASIS ON THAT OBLIGATION FOR WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS. IN THE INSTANCE, YOU HAVE CERTAIN USES THAT ARE DEFINED IN THE STATUTE, HIGH LOAD USES THAT ARE RELATED TO WATER. GENERALLY THERE IS A VERY PRECISE DEFINITION, BUT GENERALLY ALONG THE LINES OF LARGER SCALE DATA CENTERS, FOR EXAMPLE. SO IT IS NOT THE CASE THAT IT'S THE WILD WEST WITH REGARD TO WHO CAN PULL WATER OUT OF THE GROUND AND HOW MUCH THEY'RE ALLOWED TO PULL OUT OF THE GROUND. THAT MIGHT BE THE CASE IN OTHER STATES, BY THE WAY, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, YOU FIND HORROR STORIES ONLINE ON VARIOUS USES AND, YOU KNOW, THE TAP NOT WORKING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. WHEN, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING COMES INTO TOWN IN FLORIDA, WE HAVE VERY STRICT REGULATIONS AND WE HAVE AGENCIES, THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT HERE THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING THAT RESOURCE AND KNOWING EVERYONE WHO IS ALLOWED TO PULL OUT WATER FROM THE GROUND, HOW MUCH THEY'RE ALLOWED TO PULL OUT OF THE GROUND, AND MANAGING THAT IN SUCH A WAY SO THE TAP DOESN'T GO DRY. SO THE AND THAT BILL DID PROVIDE FURTHER EMPHASIS. AND ON THAT FLOOR FOR THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT TO FOCUS ON IT MORE CLOSELY AND LOOK AT IT MORE STRICTLY. SO I HOPE THAT HELPS WITH REGARD TO THOSE TWO THINGS. ON THE LAST MATTER THAT YOU ASKED ABOUT, REGARDING ASKING FOR A DEFINITION FROM THE STATE OR ANYTHING LIKE THIS, THAT IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE. ALL RIGHT. IS IF YOU WERE TO ASK ANYBODY FOR ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES, IT WOULD BE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE. HOWEVER, THE ATTORNEY 
          [01:35:02]
GENERAL'S OFFICE DOES NOT. AND THEY WOULDN'T HAVE ANY TOOLS TO, QUITE FRANKLY, INTERPRET LOCAL CODES, BECAUSE WHAT WE HAVE IS THE CODE WE HAVE. AND SO WHILE, YOU KNOW, YOU MIGHT HAVE CHANGES IN STATE LAW AND THESE CATEGORIES OF THIS AND THAT AND SO ON, I WOULD OFFER TO YOU THAT THAT THAT IS NOT AN AVENUE THAT'S AVAILABLE. I'M NOT ASKING FOR HIM TO. ON LOCAL CODE. I'M ASKING FOR A DEFINITION OF A DATA CENTER IN A, IN A DIFFERENT DATA CENTER. 
          SO I WOULD OFFER TO YOU THAT, YEAH, I, I THINK THERE IS A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING IN THE INDUSTRY OF WHAT THESE TERMS DENOTE. THAT TERM IS NOT USED EVEN IN THIS NEW FLORIDA STATUTE. THEY HAVE, THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT TERM FOR IT. AND I WOULD AND I WOULD I WOULD OFFER TO YOU THAT THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF MARKETING GOING ON IN THAT HYPERSCALE DATA CENTER. 
          IT'S KIND OF A INDUSTRY OR VERNACULAR TERM. I DON'T THINK IT WOULD. I, AS A LEGAL MATTER, IT DOES NOT GIVE RISE TO ANY DISTINCTION, WHETHER IT IS REFERRED TO BY THIS OR THAT OR IN INDUSTRY PARLANCE, OVER THE LAST 18 MONTHS TO TWO YEARS, IT'S COME TO, YOU KNOW, BE PERCEIVED AS ITS OWN CATEGORY OR ANYTHING LIKE THIS. THAT WOULD NOT BE A RELEVANT CONSIDERATION TO WHAT WE HAVE, WHAT WE'RE WORKING WITH IT WITHIN OUR ELDERS. SO THE SO THE RESPONSIBILITY LIES WITH THE VILLAGE ITSELF IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN WE DO HAVE THE CAPABILITY OF LOOKING AT OUR ELDERS AND MAKING SURE THAT THEY ARE CURRENT TO WHAT WE NEED FOR OUR COMMUNITY, THAT WE LOOK AT DOING AN OVERLAY FOR SOMETHING, FOR THE HIGH USE OR WHATEVER IT IS. WHEN WE GET INTO THE WINDOW OF TIME THAT THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE LATITUDE. AGAIN, THAT COULD CERTAINLY BE SOMETHING THE THE VILLAGE CAN LOOK AT. AND I WOULD IMAGINE THERE WOULD BE OTHER JURISDICTIONS IN THE STATE THAT WOULD BE LOOKING AT IT AS WELL. YEAH. AND BUT BY THAT POINT, THE GENIE'S ALREADY OUT OF THE BOTTLE AND WELL, THE TOOTHPASTE HAS ALREADY BEEN SQUEEZED AND IT'S NOT GOING TO GO BACK IN THE TUBE. SO. SO YEAH, I. I HAVE MY, I HAVE MY, I GUESS MY, MY DOUBTS. ONE THING IF I COULD, MADAM CHAIR, GO AHEAD. THERE'S A LOT OF US IN THIS ROOM ARE AROUND WHEN THOSE ELDERS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS BEING PUT TOGETHER. AND I JUST WANT TO REMIND EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM, THERE ARE SOME THINGS IN THOSE ELDERS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT I DON'T LIKE. AND IF YOU REMEMBER, OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE WAS FIRED. LET'S GO BACK AND THINK OF MR. WILLIAMS. YOU WERE ON IT WITH ME AND WE GOT FIRED. AND THEN CAME THE ELDERS AND. 
          AND WADE, YOU WERE AROUND FOR THAT TOO. AND SOME OF THE BATTLES I HAD WITH HOWARD BROWN AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. AND I KEPT SCREAMING BLOODY MURDER TO EVERYBODY. YOU CAN GO BACK AND LOOK AT MY FACEBOOK POST WHERE I'D PUT SECTIONS OF THE PROPOSED CODE AND SAY, GUYS, THIS ISN'T INDIAN TOWN. AND I SAID, WHAT HAPPENS IS, BECAUSE I'VE SERVED ON BOARDS LIKE THIS BEFORE, ONCE IT GETS PUT IN A DOCUMENT, PEOPLE THINK IT'S A BIBLE. OH, YOU CAN'T CHANGE THAT. THERE'S SOME GOOD REASON THAT WAS PUT IN THERE. WELL, A LOT OF TIMES IT'S NOT A GOOD REASON IT WAS PUT IN THERE. IT WAS PUT IN THERE BY SOMEBODY WHO'S INCOMPETENT. IN THIS CASE, I HAVE NO PROBLEM SAYING ALTHEA WAS COMPLETELY INCOMPETENT. WITH THAT SAID, I JUST WANT TO REMIND EVERYBODY ABOUT WHAT TOOK PLACE. AND SOME OF US ON THIS BOARD WHO DON'T THINK WE CARE ABOUT THIS PLACE, WHAT WE WENT THROUGH AND THE BATTLES THAT I FOUGHT BECAUSE I SAW WHAT WAS COMING AND SO ON AND SO FORTH WITH SOME OF THESE ISSUES, BUT ENOUGH TO TOOT THAT HORN. BUT, YOU KNOW, ONCE AGAIN, I'M GONNA GO BACK TO WHAT WE'RE HERE TO TALK ABOUT TONIGHT. 
          WE'VE GOT AN APPLICANT WHO'S COMING AND ASKING FOR A PUD AND A MAJOR SITE PLAN. THERE IS NO PROJECT ON THE BOARD. WE ARE ASSUMING THAT THERE WILL BE A DATA CENTER THERE, BUT THERE IS NO PROJECT ON THE BOARD AND I WOULD BE A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT WE'RE DISCRIMINATING AGAINST THE CLIENT OR AGAINST THE APPLICANT BY STATING THAT HE'S GOING TO BUILD A DATA CENTER. WELL, THERE'S NOTHING BEEN PROPOSED ALONG THOSE LINES. AND WHEN IT DOES, THE REGULATORY AGENCIES, THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, EVERYBODY INVOLVED WILL LOOK AT THESE THINGS CLOSELY AND DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEY HAVE THE ADEQUATE, ADEQUATE FACILITIES AND WATER AND ELECTRICAL TO BUILD WHAT THEY WANT TO BUILD. THIS IS NOTHING NEW. SO, I MEAN, THESE ARE GREAT CONVERSATIONS TO HAVE FOR SURE, BUT I KEEP TRYING TO I ALWAYS TRY TO COME BACK TO WHAT WE'RE DECIDING TONIGHT. AND WHAT WE'RE DECIDING TONIGHT IS WE HAVE A GREAT DEAL ON THE TABLE OR WE HAVE A DEAL THAT'S WIDE OPEN. I WANT TO TAKE THE GREAT DEAL AND RUN WITH IT, BECAUSE I SEE WHAT THE ADVANTAGES ARE FOR INDIAN 
          [01:40:02]
TALENT, AND THEY ARE TREMENDOUS. SO WITH THAT SAID, I HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE. WE'RE NOT READY FOR A MOTION. I STILL HAVE QUESTIONS. WELL, I MADE A MOTION EARLIER, AND I TOLD YOU THEN THAT I WASN'T GOING TO ENTERTAIN IT BECAUSE. YEAH. OKAY. SO I HAVE QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND THINGS OF THAT SORT. ONE OF THE QUESTIONS IS IF ANY PRIVATE WELLS, SEPTIC TANKS OR PACKAGE PLANTS BECOME INFEASIBLE IN THE FUTURE, IS THERE A BINDING COMMITMENT THAT THE DEVELOPER, NOT TAXPAYERS, WILL FUND ALL INSTRUCT INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES REQUIRED FOR MUNICIPAL CONNECTION? AND. IF THE IF THE APPLICANT HAS ANYTHING TO SAY TO THAT IN THE FIRST INSTANCE. ALL RIGHT. YEAH. REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAYING FOR INFRASTRUCTURE TO COMBINE TO CONNECT TO THE VILLAGE WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEM. IT IS THE UNIFORM POLICY AND THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE THAT THE THAT THE USER, THE PROPERTY OWNER SEEKING TO GET CONNECTED PAYS FOR ALL THAT INFRASTRUCTURE. SO THAT'S WHERE WE'RE GOING TO BE IF IT COMES TO BE THAT THAT COMES ABOUT. AND THAT HAS BEEN THE UNIFORM POLICY AND THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE, AS IMPLEMENTED SINCE THE VILLAGE ACQUIRED THE UTILITY, SO ARE YOU. ARE YOU SAYING THAT THERE IS A BINDING COMMITMENT? I'M SAYING IT'S THE LAW OF THE VILLAGE RIGHT NOW THAT IT BE. SO THAT'S A NICE THING ABOUT WHEN YOU HAVE A MUNICIPAL WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY. WE HAVE A CHAPTER, ONE OF THE FEW CHAPTERS OF OUR OF OUR CODE OF ORDINANCE PROPER, THAT IS THE WATER AND WASTEWATER CODE OR UTILITY CODE. 
          AND IT HAS MATTERS CONCERNING MANDATORY CONNECTION WHEN IT'S WITHIN CERTAIN RANGES AND WHO PAYS FOR IT AND WHO PAYS FOR IT. IT'S THE PROPERTY OWNER. SO WHEN IT COMES TO THAT, THAT IS GOING TO BE A CONDITION PURSUANT TO THE ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE, PURSUANT TO THE LAW OF THE VILLAGE. OKAY. SO IF I CAN ASK WHAT IS THE VILLAGE'S CURRENT AVAILABLE WATER AND WASTEWATER RESERVE CAPACITY? DEAN OF DINA FREEMAN, THE CURRENT CAPACITY IS WITH WATER. 
          THERE IS WE'RE AT CAPACITY WITH THE SUICIDE OF IT. WE HAVE CAPACITY. BUT I ALSO NEED TO ADD THAT THIS IS A MASTER SITE PLAN. SO RESERVATION OF CAPACITY IS AT FINAL SITE PLAN STAGE AND NOT AT MASTER. YEAH. THIS THIS PUD ZONING AGREEMENT DOES NOT RESERVE ANY WATER OR WASTEWATER CAPACITY AT THIS STAGE AT ALL. AND AS PCB MEMBERS KNOW, BECAUSE YOU'VE HAD OTHER PROJECTS COME THROUGH, EVEN TO THE POINT WHERE YOU HAD A VERY SPECIFIC AND, AND MUCH SMALLER SCALE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WHERE THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT COULD GO IN INITIALLY WERE CURTAILED BECAUSE OF THE LIMITATION ON CAPACITY WE HAVE IN THE CURRENT PLAN. AS YOU ALL KNOW, THE VILLAGE IS WORKING DILIGENTLY WITH AN INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT HAS COME DOWN FROM THE STATE TO WORK ON IMPROVING THE EXISTING PLANT, EXPANDING CAPACITY AND BUILDING THE NEW PLANT. SO ALONG THOSE LINES, WATER CAPACITY IS ANTICIPATED IN THE FUTURE. WELL, WHILE I UNDERSTAND THAT THE REASON FOR MY QUESTION IS BECAUSE I'M THE CONCERN IS REALLY MY QUESTIONS ARE GEARED SO THAT I CAN HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING AND KNOWING IF WHAT'S HAPPENING WILL PROTECT THE VILLAGE FROM FUTURE INHERITED COSTS. THAT'S THE REASON FOR THE QUESTION. MY NEXT QUESTION IS WHY IS THE UTILITY DEMAND BEING ADDRESSED PHASE BY PHASE, RATHER THAN THROUGH A MASTER UTILITY PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE 30 YEAR PDU? I'M JUST TRYING TO THINK ABOUT WHERE. SO I'M SORRY IT'S BEEN A LONG DAY. JUST REPEAT THE QUESTION. SURE. WHY IS THE UTILITY DEMAND BEING ADDRESSED PHASE BY PHASE RATHER THAN THROUGH A MASTER UTILITY PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE 30 YEAR? P D SO DINA FREEMAN, THE MASTER UTILITY PLAN IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS STAGE. THE COMMITMENTS WITHIN THE PUD AND THE PHASE DEVELOPMENT. AND WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS. EACH PHASE HAS TO BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE WITH THE WATER, SEWER, THE ROADS, ANY OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE, THE BUILDINGS. AND IT HAS TO EITHER BE ABLE TO STAND ALONE OR THEY CAN BUILD IT AS TWO PHASES OR THREE PHASES. IT HAS TO BASICALLY BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE INFRASTRUCTURE OR IT WILL NEVER BE APPROVED. 
          [01:45:03]
AND THAT'S A REQUIREMENT. NOT ONLY IS THE WATER AND SEWER OWNERS OF THE WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES, BUT ALSO IT'S CARRIED FORWARD THROUGH THE WATER WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENT THAT'S ATTACHED TO A FINAL SITE PLAN. SO AT THE MASTER PLAN LEVEL, THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO DO THAT, NOT UNDER OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OR UNDER OUR COMP PLAN. IT'S A REALLY GOOD QUESTION IN TERMS OF LOOKING AT THE BIGGER PICTURE. BUT THE MASTER PLAN SETS THE SCENE AND THEN THE FINAL SITE PLAN AT MASTER AND PHASING, AND THEN THE FINAL SITE PLAN COMES INTO EFFECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT'S BEEN SET OUT IN THE DOCUMENTS THAT YOU'VE GOT BEFORE YOU TODAY. SO THAT IS NOT A REQUIREMENT IN ANY OF THE CODES. AND MADAM CHAIR, I WANTED TO ADDRESS ONE OTHER THING AS WELL, JUST TO TO ADDRESS PERHAPS A GENERAL CONCERN BECAUSE. I'VE GOTTEN THE IMPRESSION THERE'S A PERCEPTION BECAUSE OF APPARENT EXPERIENCES IN DIFFERENT STATES WITH HIGHLY DIFFERENT REGULATORY STRUCTURES, THAT THERE'S A CONCERN THAT IF YOU HAVE MORE USES COMING INTO AN AREA THAT MAY HOOK UP TO A MUNICIPAL WATER PLANT, THAT SOMEHOW MORE USES AND MORE DEMAND FOR WATER CAN HOOK UP TO THAT SYSTEM THAN THERE IS WATER TO SERVE IT. THAT IS NOT HOW IT WORKS IN FLORIDA. WE ARE NOT ALLOWED. THE VILLAGE IS 100% ABSOLUTELY NOT ALLOWED BY STATE REGULATORS, BY FDEP, AMONG OTHERS, TO ALLOW SERVICE HOOKUP FOR EITHER WATER OR WASTEWATER CAPACITY. IF WE DO NOT HAVE THAT CAPACITY TO GIVE, IT IS ACTUALLY ONE OF THE FEW TYPES OF CONCURRENCY THAT REMAINS. THAT'S A TECHNICAL TERM, BUT THAT'S ONE OF THE FEW TYPES OF CONCURRENCY THAT REMAINS IN THE FLORIDA STATUTES TO SAY, IF YOU DON'T HAVE IT, THEN YOU CAN'T HAVE IT FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. IF YOU DON'T HAVE THE WATER TO GIVE, YOU CAN'T GIVE IT. I DON'T KNOW HOW IT'S DONE IN OTHER STATES, BUT WHERE IT COMES TO BE IS ULTIMATELY, IF A USER COMES IN AND THE WATER IS NOT THERE FOR IT, THEY CAN'T HAVE THE WATER. IT'S NOT EVERYBODY HOOKING UP, AND THEN EVERYBODY JUST GETS LESS WATER. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT. I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION IN REGARDS TO WELL, THE QUESTION IS HOW IS INTENSITY DEFINED IN THIS AGREEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF FUTURE ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS? YEAH. SO THERE'S A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT'S IN REGARDING THE THRESHOLDS. AND THE THRESHOLDS ARE ACTUALLY REGARDING HAVING AN INDUSTRIAL PLATTED SUBDIVISION. SO THERE'S THE TABLE THAT'S CROSS-REFERENCED IN THE PUD ZONING AGREEMENT IS IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. I THINK SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT HOUSING INTENSITY LIMITED IN THE WHOLE THING. OH, WITH THE TRIPS AND TRAFFIC. SORRY, I THOUGHT YOU MEANT IN TERMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL. YEAH. 
          SO WE'VE GOT THE APPLICANT'S TRAFFIC CONSULTANT HERE. I'M NOT AN EXPERT IN TRAFFIC, BUT WE HAVE HAD A REVIEW FROM THE VILLAGE REVIEWER AS A TRAFFIC CONSULTANT THAT'S COMPLIED THE PROJECT. BUT I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE THE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT FOR THE APPLICANT BECAUSE THEY CAN ANSWER IT MORE TECHNICALLY. SORRY ABOUT THAT. I GOT THE WRONG. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. MY NAME IS STEPHANIE GUERRA. I'M A TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER WITH KIMLEY-HORN ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. SO ULTIMATELY WE LOOKED AT WE ANALYZED THE TRIPS ASSOCIATED WITH 2,000,000FT■S OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. SO THAT CAME OUT TO 7200 DAILY TRIPS, 960 TRIPS DURING THE AM PEAK HOUR AND 980 TRIPS DURING THE PM PEAK HOUR AND ANALYZED THE. THE IMPACTS OF THAT FOR BOTH SIGNIFICANCE AND CAPACITY TO DETERMINE THAT THERE WOULD BE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY ON THE ROADS. UNDERSTANDING THAT THE INDIVIDUAL SITE PLANS WOULD HAVE TO COME IN WITH MORE DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS IN THE FUTURE, AS THEY CAME IN WITH WHAT THEY WERE REQUESTING SPECIFICALLY. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SO MY LAST QUESTION WOULD BE AFTER TONIGHT, WHAT SPECIFIC APPROVALS FOR FUTURE PHASES WOULD STILL COME BACK THROUGH A PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS? I THINK I STARTED TO ANSWER THAT LAST. SO THERE IS A PROVISION IN THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS THAT CROSS-REFERENCES WITH THE TABLE IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND THAT'S WHERE WE GET INTO THAT. IF THERE IS A PLAT INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION THAT'S PLATTED, THEN IT IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED AT THE ADMINISTRATIVE LEVEL AND DOESN'T COME BEFORE THE PCB OR VILLAGE COUNCIL. SO CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION CODE PROVISION THAT'S BEEN CARRIED FORWARD INTO THE ZONING AGREEMENT. AND WITH THAT, MINDFUL OF SENATE BILL 180 AND NOT BEING ALLOWED TO MAKE THINGS STRICTER. SO. SO GOING FORWARD, AFTER DECIDED THAT THIS POD MOVES FORWARD AND GOES TO THE COUNCIL, 
          [01:50:07]
AND HYPOTHETICALLY, IF THE COUNCIL APPROVES IT, WHEN THE BUILDOUT BEGINS. WILL THOSE PHASES COME BACK TO THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC OPINION, OR WILL IT BE HANDLED ADMINISTRATIVELY? IT WILL BE HANDLED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES. THEY THERE'S A TEAM OF PROFESSIONALS AND STAFF, ENVIRONMENTAL FIRE, ENGINEERING, TRAFFIC, OBVIOUSLY PLANNING, LEGAL AND. AND BASICALLY THE CODES THAT ARE IN PLACE AND THE POD PROVISION AND IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGS AND THE COMP PLAN ARE ALL STILL REVIEWED AT EVERY STAGE IN THE PROCESS. AND THEY HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF USE, IF THERE'S SOME PROVISION IN THERE REGARDING DATA CENTERS, BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN SO THERE'S BEEN SO MUCH CONCERN AMONGST THE COMMUNITY. SO THERE'S ADDITIONAL PROVISION IN THERE THAT COMMITS TO AN OUTREACH WITH COMMUNITY, CREATING AN EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY LIAISON. SO THERE IS ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS IN THERE WITH INVOLVEMENT FOR THE COMMUNITY, WITH THE WITH THE HOT TOPIC USE THAT'S BEEN, YOU KNOW, COMMUNICATED THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY. SO THAT IS IN THERE AS A PROVISION. AND THEN THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES MEETINGS ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 
          YOU CAN OBSERVE THOSE DISCUSSIONS, THE STAFF REPORTS AND THE REVIEWS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. WE CAN WE CAN SHARE THAT INFORMATION. SO THERE'S STILL, YOU KNOW, AND OUR OFFICE IS OPEN. WE RECEIVE QUESTIONS. I'M SO BUSY WITH JUST PEOPLE WALKING IN AND ASKING FOR CONFIRMATION OF WHAT'S HAPPENING. AND I SIT DOWN AND TAKE THE TIME WITH INDIVIDUALS AND YOU CAN AND WE OPEN UP COMMUNICATION WITH THE OTHER EXPERTS, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, COLLEAGUE, EXPERTS, ANYBODY. AT ANY POINT, THE PHONE NUMBERS ARE GIVEN AND THE EMAILS ARE GIVEN IN EVERY STAFF REPORT. SO IT'S NOT A CLOSED DOOR POLICY, BUT IT IS A CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION PROCEDURE. SO WITH EVERYTHING YOU JUST SAID. WOULD I BE WRONG TO. SAY THAT IT WILL NOT GO TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL AND IT WILL BE HANDLED HANDLED ADMINISTRATIVELY? ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE MASTER SITE PLAN? NO, I'M TALKING ABOUT THE QUESTION THAT I JUST POSED AND ABOUT FINAL SITE PLAN OR MASTER SITE PLAN, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO VILLAGE COUNCIL NEXT WEEK. WELL, I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT WHEN THE BUILD OUT PHASES START, OKAY, IS WHAT MY THAT THIS LAST QUESTION WAS CENTERED AROUND, IF I MAY, JAMIE, FOR THE RECORD, MADAM CHAIR, WHAT WHAT WE HAVE PROFFERED AND WHAT WE VOLUNTEERED IN OUR AGREEMENT IS WHAT WHAT YOU'RE HEARING FROM DEAN DINA, IS THAT IT WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO COME BACK. HOWEVER, FOR USES THAT ARE NON-UTILITY, WE PUT A PROVISION IN THERE THAT WOULD ASK THEM TO DO TO ANY TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT, WOULD DO AN OPEN HOUSE. SO YOU WOULD HAVE A COMMUNITY, YOU WOULD HAVE A COMMUNITY MEETING, AND SO YOU WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT. SO, OKAY. THANK YOU. BEFORE I ENTERTAIN A MOTION, I HAVE ONE MORE THING I WOULD LIKE TO SAY. THE PROPOSED PUD FOR LARGE SCALE DATA CENTER REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT LONG TERM DECISION FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD SHOULD FIRST ENSURE THAT IT HAS COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT'S PHYSICAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS. I RECOMMEND REQUIRING A COMPREHENSIVE PHYSICAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR FROM THE APPLICANT, INCLUDING PROJECTED REVENUES, UTILITY REVENUES, WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL IMPACT FEES AND THE FULL COST OF TO SERVE THE AND THE FULL COST TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH A CLEAR NET PHYSICAL IMPACT. GIVEN THE COMPLEXITY OF THIS PROJECT AND THE VILLAGE'S LIMITED IN-HOUSE CAPACITY TO EVALUATE SUCH ANALYSIS AND INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW FUNDED BY THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT SHOULD DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE LAW, INCLUDING FLORIDA SENATE BILL 44, PARTICULARLY AS PARTICULARLY AS IT RELATES TO UTILITY DEMAND, WATER USE AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. BEYOND THE PHYSICAL ANALYSIS, THE BOARD SHOULD ENSURE THAT ALL INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING WATER, SEWER, ROADWAY, STORMWATER AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS IS FULLY FUNDED BY THE DEVELOPER AND NOT SUBSIDIZED TO THE PUBLIC. THIS SHOULD BE FORMALIZED THROUGH A BINDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT INCLUDES A CLEAR NO PUBLIC SUBSIDY PROVISION, UTILITY CAPACITY VERIFICATION AND REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO WATER USE, INCLUDING RECLAIMED WATER. WHERE FEASIBLE, COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS SUCH AS BUFFERING, NOISE AND LIGHTING CONTROLS, AND TRAFFIC AND CONSTRUCTION 
          [01:55:06]
MANAGEMENT. TAKING THESE STEPS WILL HELP ENSURE THAT THE VILLAGE IS PROTECTED FINANCIALLY AND OPERATIONALLY, WHILE FULLY UNDERSTANDING THE BENEFITS AND IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE CHAIR WOULD BE OPEN TO A MOTION TO POSTPONE CONSIDERATION OF THIS. 
          IF A MEMBER WISHES TO MAKE ONE. POSTPONE CONSIDERATION UNTIL. FOR. FOR THE. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. SO I WOULD BE IN SUPPORT OF THIS BILL, BUT WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS. SO. BUT POSTPONE IN ORDER FOR THOSE CONDITIONS TO BE MET BEFORE MOVING FORWARD. YES. IS THE FLOOR OPEN FOR. YES, IT'S OPEN STILL. OKAY. WELL, IT'S A FLOOR. YES. MADAM CHAIR, I BELIEVE THE FLOOR IS OPEN FOR ANY MOTION. YES, IT IS OKAY. WITH THAT BEING SAID, I MOVE FOR STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF BOTH THE PUD PUD ZONING AGREEMENT AND THE MASTER SITE PLAN. SO MOVED. THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND. AND JUST TO CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD, IS THE REZONING PUD ZONING AGREEMENT AND MASTER SITE PLAN. ALL IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. 
          WONDERFUL. OKAY. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? CHAIR MILEY. NO. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. 
          BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. GIBBS. THOMAS. NO. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMSON. YES. 
          COMMISSIONERS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME THIS EVENING. APPRECIATE IT. I JUST DO THAT. 
          MADAM CHAIR, I RECOMMEND GIVING EVERYBODY A SECOND TO MOVE ON OUT IF THEY'RE GOING TO BE MOVING ON OUT. YOU HAVE TWO OTHER BRIEF ITEMS ON YOUR AGENDA OR THREE OTHER BRIEF ITEMS TO ADDRESS, BUT GIVE EVERYBODY A MINUTE. 
          [7.2) Election of Chair]
THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ELECTION OF CHAIR WADE. YES, MADAM CHAIR, I THINK, YEAH, HISTORICALLY, BOTH FOR THE COUNCIL AND AND FOR THE PCB, I'VE CONDUCTED THOSE ELECTIONS AT LEAST WITH RESPECT TO CHAIRS. SO IF THAT'S ALL RIGHT, I'LL GO AHEAD AND HANDLE THAT. AT THIS TIME. I WILL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR THE. I'M SORRY. I NEED TO TALK DIRECTLY INTO THE MIC, TELL EVERYBODY ELSE TO DO IT. THANK YOU SO MUCH, SIR. I WOULD OPEN THE FLOOR AT THIS TIME FOR NOMINATION TO SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE PAB. I WOULD NOTE THAT THE. 
          THE VILLAGE ELDERS DO INDICATE THAT THAT THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR. MOST. BOTH MUST BE RESIDENTS OF THE VILLAGE. SO WITH THAT I WOULD OPEN THE FLOOR FOR NOMINATIONS. MR. WILLIAMS, WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE THE CHAIRMAN? I NOMINATE MR. WILLIAMS. NO, NO, I DON'T LIVE IN THE RESIDENCE. I'M OUT. YEAH. YOU'LL ACCEPT IT? NO. OH, NO. HE RESPECTFULLY DECLINED. OKAY, WELL, THEN I WILL NOMINATE DANIELLE, WILL YOU? I DON'T KNOW, I'VE NEVER DONE IT BEFORE. 
          SO ARE THERE ANY FURTHER NOMINATIONS? HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN. WE'LL CLOSE NOMINATIONS, AND I WILL ENTERTAIN. A MOTION TO NAME MEMBER DANIEL WILLIAMSON AS THE CHAIR FOR THE YEAR. CONGRATULATIONS. OH, GOSH. I APOLOGIZE FOR THE SAKE OF RECORD REAL QUICK, IF SOMEONE COULD JUST MAKE THAT MOTION SAY SO MOVED, I MADE THAT OH SO MOVED. THAT WAS ME. YES. YEP. IS THERE A SECOND? WE NEED A SECOND. WE NEED SOMEONE TO SAY 
          [02:00:05]
SECOND, IF THERE IS ANY SECOND FOR DANIELLE TO BE. A SECOND, IT'S BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED. 
          ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE INDICATE BY SAYING AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? NAY. ALL RIGHT. 
          [7.3) Election of Vice Chair]
CONGRATULATIONS. WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO CONDUCT THE VICE CHAIR ELECTION AS WELL? ABSOLUTELY. 
          AND ACTUALLY, WE CAN DO THE CHANGE AT AT THE END OF THE MEETING, I IMAGINE. SO IS OR I WILL OPEN THE FLOOR NOW FOR THE NOMINATION TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR. I'LL NOMINATE MISS SUSAN GIBBS. THOMAS, WHERE ARE THE OTHER TWO PEOPLE? THEY ARE HERE. THEY THEY MISS OUT? YEAH, THEY MISS OUT. YEAH. ALRIGHT. THEY WERE SMART. YEAH. WE HAVE WE HAVE DUELING MATTERS HERE. MISS MALIA. I'VE HEARD A NOMINATION THERE AND. I DON'T ACCEPT. OKAY. ALRIGHT THEN. I HAVE HEARD A NOMINATION FOR MEMBER SUSAN GIBBS THOMAS TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR. ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR? AWESOME. ALL RIGHT. THEN I WILL CLOSE THE NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO NAME SUSAN GIBBS THOMAS AS VICE CHAIR. I MAKE A MOTION TO MAKE SUSAN GIBBS THOMAS THE VICE CHAIR. IS THERE A SECOND? IT'S BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE INDICATE BY SAYING AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? NAY. CONGRATULATIONS. YOU REMEMBER ABOUT SEVEN YEARS AGO, SUSAN, YOU REMEMBER ABOUT SEVEN YEARS AGO. MISS DINA? YEAH, THAT WAS FUNNY. AT LEAST WE GOT IT ONE ROUND. I'LL TRY AND MAKE THIS QUICK. DINA FREEMAN WITH 
          [8.1) Development Report ]
THE COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THIS IS THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY UPDATE. 
          AND I WANT TO START BY APOLOGIZING BECAUSE WE'VE LEARNED A LESSON IN AGENDA MANAGEMENT. AND WHEN YOU UPLOAD WITHOUT IT BEING A PDF AND JUST A POWERPOINT, IT GOES COMPLETELY WRONG. AND IT WAS ALL IN PORTRAIT INSTEAD OF LANDSCAPE. SO I REALLY DO APOLOGIZE. SO WE HAVE OBVIOUSLY UPDATED IT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S READ CORRECTLY FOR TONIGHT. 
          SO I REALLY DO APOLOGIZE FOR ANYBODY THAT GOT THE PACKET ONLINE. WE'LL LEARN FROM THAT FOR THE NEXT ONE. SO I'M JUST GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS REALLY QUICKLY. THIS IS ALL THE LIST OF NONRESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. MOST OF THEM YOU'RE AWARE OF. THEY'RE NOT NEW TO THE LIST, BUT WHERE THEY ARE AT IS AT THE APPROVED AND OPEN FOR BUSINESS FOR SOME OF THOSE, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY I'M NOT GOING TO READ EVERY ONE OF THEM, BUT THEY'RE, THEY'RE, THEY'RE EITHER UNDER CONSTRUCTION, THEIR BUILDING PERMIT STAGE OR THEY'RE ACTUALLY OPEN FOR BUSINESS. SO THERE'S BEEN SOME PROGRESS AND A LOT OF HARD WORK IN THE, IN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND IN COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN GENERAL, WITH INTAKE AND WORKING WITH MARTIN COUNTY ON THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW AND INSPECTIONS. IT'S WORKING OUT VERY WELL AND COMPANIES ARE DEFINITELY MOVING FORWARD AND GETTING TO THAT END STAGE. SO NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS JUST TO GIVE YOU INFORMATION ON THE INDIAN TOWN UPCYCLING FACILITY. THIS IS FOR THE PLAT. 
          SO THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED AND THEY'RE COMING IN FOR THE PLAT TO DO A PLAT FOR THE PROPERTY IN RELATION TO THE JUICE PLANT. FORMER JUICE PLANT I TOWN PROPERTY. SO THAT'S UNDER REVIEW. WELL IT'S ACTUALLY BEEN IN REVIEW. STAFF REPORT HAS BEEN ISSUED AND IT'S PENDING AN APPLICANT RESUBMISSION. SO THAT'S JUST TO GIVE YOU THAT AS ONE OF THE NEW PROJECTS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THEN WE'VE GOT US ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION. A DEVELOPMENT ORDER HAS BEEN DRAFTED AND IS WITH OUR VILLAGE ATTORNEY FOR HIS REVIEW AHEAD OF C D DIRECTOR SIGNING AND THAT GETTING RECORDED. SO THAT'S A TRUCK PARKING AND OFFICE FACILITY IN VENTURE PARK. ONE OF THOSE PED DEVELOPMENTS, SILVER FOX. WE HAVE A REQUEST FOR A PUD REZONING AND A PUD MASTER SITE PLAN WITH PHASING PLAN. THAT'S TWO POINT 2,000,000FT■S WITH A VERY SPECIFIC END USE AS A DATA CENTER. THE REQUEST IS ALSO TO REZONE, AND IT'S VERY CONSISTENT WITH THE PROCESS THAT YOU'VE BEEN THROUGH TODAY FOR THE REZONING FOR THE TESORO. IT'S UNDER REVIEW WITH DRC AHEAD OF SCHEDULING. BEFORE PCB AND VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS. STAFF ARE UNDER REVIEW RIGHT NOW. IT HAS TO BE READY TO COME BEFORE YOU. WE'RE STILL IN REVIEW RIGHT NOW WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. SO THAT'S THE STATUS VENTURE PARK. WE HAVE HAD AN APPLICATION IN FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE, MAINLY CONSTRUCTION RELATED LOT 24. IT'S ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING VACANT PARCELS THAT'S NOT BEEN EITHER DEVELOPED OR APPROVED FOR SITE PLANNING ON THE VENTURE PARK INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, AND THAT'S IN A STAFF REPORT HAS BEEN ISSUED. WE'RE PENDING THE APPLICANT RESUBMISSION. 
          NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. PROJECT GROWLER. THIS IS A PRE-APPLICATION. IT WAS SCHEDULED TO GO BEFORE THE 15TH OF APRIL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MEETING AS A PRE APP. SO A 
          [02:05:03]
PRE-APPLICATION IS PRIOR TO THEM PREPARING AND SUBMITTING ANY TYPE OF TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. STAFF HAVE PREPARED A DRAFT STAFF REPORT, BUT THE APPLICANT AT THEIR REQUEST NEEDED SOME MORE TIME BEFORE THEY COULD ATTEND THE MEETING. SO WE'RE JUST HOLDING OFF AND WE'LL ISSUE THAT AND GIVE THEM THAT INFORMATION AHEAD, AND THEN THEY'LL HAVE A ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION. I BELIEVE IT WILL BE ON THE 20TH OF MAY. IF IF THAT IS CONFIRMED BY THEM. INDIAN WOOD LANDING, THERE'S AN APPLICATION AND IT'S JUST DEEMED IT'S BEEN ACTUALLY DEEMED COMPLETE. AND WE'RE PENDING THEM RESUBMITTING FOR 18,140FT■S OF RETAIL AND 76 TOWNHOMES. AND THIS IS JUST EAST OF INDIAN WOOD ENTRANCE. AND IT'S THAT BIT THAT IS CURRENTLY USED FOR MULTIPLE USES. IT'S IT'S OWNED BY THE COMPANY KENDALL INDUSTRIAL THAT CAME INTO THE VENTURE PARK AND HAVE LOOKED AT IDENTIFYING AND PURCHASING SOME LAND TO ACCOMMODATE THEIR WORKFORCE COMING IN AND FUTURE WORKFORCE. SO THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S IN WITH THE APPLICATION PROCESS, 76 TOWNHOMES AND 18,140FT■S OF RETAIL TO SARA GROVES. OBVIOUSLY, THAT'S ON THE LIST AND THAT'S WHAT YOU'VE HAD BEFORE YOU TODAY. SO WE DON'T NEED TO GO INTO THAT NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. TERRA LAGO WE HAVE A SIX AMENDMENT IN FOR A PUD ZONING. SO THEY HAVE A PUD THAT'S BEEN IN PLACE. IN FACT IT WAS A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT. AND IT'S A 20 PLUS YEAR PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN THE LAST FEW YEARS WITH THE GARCIA GROUP. AND THEY'VE REQUESTED A SIX AMENDMENT TO INCREASE FROM 2488 TO 2500, WHICH IS ACTUALLY THE THRESHOLD ESTABLISHED ALREADY IN THE DRY AND THE PUD, BUT ALSO TO INCREASE FROM 100,000FT■S OF COMMERCIAL TO 200,000, WHICH IS WHY THE MASTER PLAN AND THE PUD IS BEING OPENED UP. AND THEY'RE ALSO PROVIDING A FIRE STATION FACILITY. SO THERE'S A SIX AMENDMENT IN IT'S IN REVIEW WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES. AND THAT WILL BE COMING TO YOU AS PLANNING ZONING APPEAL BOARD AS THE LPA IN A FUTURE MEETING, POTENTIALLY EARLY MAY. AND THEN WE'VE GOT THE MAJOR SITE PLAN ONE B THAT'S APPROVED IN THE BUILDING PERMIT STAGE SO THAT THERE'S NO NOT MUCH MORE TO REPORT OTHER THAN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT'S VERY BUSY WITH BUILDING PERMITS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS THIS IS WHERE IT INDICATES THE FINAL SITE PLAN SUBMISSION. IT'S JUST THE REST OF THE PHASES THAT ARE INDICATED IN BLUE FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE TERRA LAGO PUD AS IT COMES FORWARD. THEY HAVE THAT PHASING PLAN. THEY HAVE THE PED AGREEMENT, AND THEN THEY'RE IMPLEMENTING BASED ON THAT MASTER SITE PLAN, THEY'LL BE COMING IN FOR INDIVIDUAL SITE PLANS FOR COMBINATION OF PHASES OR INDIVIDUAL PHASES IN THE FUTURE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. 
          AND THAT'S THAT'S IT IN TERMS OF NEW I THINK NEXT SLIDE. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT INDIAN BECAUSE IT'S COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL. I PUT THE INDIAN WOOD LANDING ON THE RESIDENTIAL AS WELL BECAUSE THERE'S THOSE TOWNHOMES, OSCEOLA PINES PLAT. THERE IS A PLAT THAT'S IN OSCEOLA PINES CAME IN AND WAS APPROVED AS A PUD AND A PD AMENDMENT AND A SITE PLAN. 
          THEY'RE IN FOR COMPLETENESS REVIEW FOR THEIR PLAT AT THE MOMENT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THERE'S A HERITAGE PARK PLAT. THERE WAS APPROVAL OF A MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR 71 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO SELL OFF ANY OF THAT PROPERTY, THEY NEED A PLAT APPROVAL. SO THEY'RE WHERE THEY'RE AT. WE'RE PENDING A RESUBMISSION. THEY HAVE HAD SOME REVIEWS BY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES, AND WE'RE PENDING THE RESUBMISSION IN RESPONSE TO THOSE COMMENTS. AND CITRUS GROVE THERE IS A AND IT'S IN UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL. IT'S IN LATER AS WELL UNDER THE THE LAND USE AMENDMENT CATEGORY. BUT IT'S A PROPOSAL FOR 309 UNITS, SINGLE FAMILY. AND I DON'T KNOW WHY I'VE PUT TWO, BUT IT'S TOWNHOMES AND THERE'S A BASICALLY A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. THAT WILL REQUIRE PAB AS THE LPA AND VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS. AND THAT'S UNDER REVIEW. IN FACT, THE REPORTS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE APPLICANT, AND WE NEED TO NOW DETERMINE WHEN THEY WANT TO SCHEDULE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. AND THIS IS JUST THE ANNEXATIONS WE'VE HAD. BESKAR INVESTMENTS, LLC IS A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION AND ALSO A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. REPORTS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE APPLICANT, AND WE'RE PENDING THE APPLICANT RESPONSE IN TERMS OF WHETHER THEY'RE READY TO LOOK AT SCHEDULING BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS OR IF THEY'VE GOT ANY RESUBMISSION INFORMATION TO PROVIDE. AND NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. 
          AND THIS IS JUST THE LOCATION OF THE BASKA INVESTMENTS APPLICATION. IT'S IT'S EAST OF THE EXISTING VENTURE PARK PROPERTY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS THE GROVE THAT WE'VE HAD TODAY. SO I DON'T NEED TO GO INTO THAT, BUT IT'S JUST LISTING THE IT'S WHERE WE 
          [02:10:05]
LIST THE ANNEXATION COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS AND REZONING. SO THIS IS UNDER THE REZONING AT THIS POINT TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS PROJECT, THIS IS THE PROJECT POWER, WHICH AGAIN, THIS IS THE PROJECT WHEN IT WAS PROJECT POWER FOR THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE AND ANNEXATION THAT WAS APPROVED IN PREVIOUS PB AND VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETINGS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THAT'S JUST THE LOCATION YOU'RE ALREADY AWARE OF. I THINK WE'RE ALMOST AT THE END. AND THIS IS JUST THE SUMMARY OF THE CITRUS GROVE, BECAUSE IT COMES UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REZONING APPLICATION, AND THAT'S THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. THAT IS THE LOCATION PLAN. SORRY. IT SHOWS IT OFF OF CITRUS AND MYRTLE DRIVE TO THE WEST. AND THAT'S THE EXTENT OF THE BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AND THAT'S THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IF YOU'VE GOT ANY QUESTIONS I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER. 
          THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? WE'RE GOOD COMMENT. THAT'S AN OVERWHELMING AMOUNT OF WORK YOU GUYS ARE DOING. MY GOSH. THAT'S TRUE. THANK YOU SO MUCH STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION, FOR ALL THE WORK THAT YOU PUT IN TO BRING FORTH ALL THIS INFORMATION. THANK YOU FOR THE APPLICANT FOR ALSO YOUR WILLINGNESS TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, ADDRESS CONCERNS.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.