[1) CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:11]
THE MEETING TO ORDER AND START OFF WITH A ROLL CALL. CHAIR MILEY, PRESENT WILLIAMS HERE.
BOARD MEMBER. WATSON HERE. BOARD MEMBER. GIBSON HERE. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON HERE.
BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMSON HERE. INVOCATION. ARE YOU GOING TO DO IT? PLEASE. FATHER GOD, WE COME NOW AS OPPOSED TO ANOTHER DAY. AND THANK YOU, HEAVENLY FATHER, FOR ALLOWING US TO BE IN THIS DAY. THANK YOU FOR THIS FIRST MEETING OF THIS FIRST NEW YEAR TO GIVE US CREDENCE TO HEAVENLY FATHER, AND IN THE WORDS OF OUR MOUTHS AND THE MEDITATIONS OF OUR HEARTS, BE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SIGHT, O LORD, OUR STRENGTH AND OUR REDEEMER. IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS WE PRAY. AMEN, AMEN, AMEN. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. I'D LIKE TO ENTERTAIN AND APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA SO MOVED. SECOND ROLL
[5) APPROVAL OF AGENDA]
CALL. CHAIR MILEY. YES. YES, LORD. YES, YES, YES. BOARD MEMBER WAS. YES. ON TO OUR[71.) ORDINANCE NO. 01-2026 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, ANNEXING BY VOLUNTARY PETITION CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TOTALING 5,722.30 +/-ACRES IN SIZE, LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF SW KANNER HIGHWAY AND WEST OF WARFIELD BLVD, AND IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, PARCEL IDS 32-39-38-001-006-00000-7, 32-39-38-001-012-00000-5, 32-39-38-001-018-00001-1, 32-39-38-001-024-00010-8, 32-39-38-001-029-00010-7, 32-39-38-001-034-00011-6, 32-39-38-001-039-00001-7, 09-40-38-000-000-00030-1, 03-40-38-000-000-00050-9, 10-40-38-000-000-00020-1, 15-40-38-000-000-00010-2, 22-40-38-000-000-00010-8, 27-40-38-000-000-00010-7, 11-40-38-000-000-00020-9, 14-40-38-000-000-00010-5, 23-40-38-000-000-00010-6, 26-40-38-000-000-00010-9, 03-40-38-000-000-00011-0, WHICH PROPERTY IS CONTIGUOUS TO THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.044, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND OTHER CONTROLLING LAW; REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN TO INCLUDE SAID PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND A MAP; PROVIDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND NOTICE TO APPROPRIATE AGENCIES; AND PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS, CONFLICTS, NON-CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.]
REGULAR AGENDA. ORDINANCE NUMBER 01-262026- YOU, DENA FREEMAN, COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND PLANNING REVIEWER WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES, YOU'RE GOING TO INTRODUCE, YOU'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE AGENDA OR READ THE TITLE. NO, NO YOU'RE NOT TODAY. SO I ORDINARILY PRESENT HE JUST TOLD ME AS WELL. BUT I WAS LIKE, WAIT, WE'RE ALREADY STARTED. SO I'M GOING TO DO MY PRESENTATION AT THE PODIUM BECAUSE I FEEL THAT'S MORE COMFORTABLE TO PRESENT TO YOU GUYS. SO I'M JUST GOING TO DO THAT STRAIGHT AWAY. AND AFTER THAT, WE'RE GOING TO ASK THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE THEIR THEY'VE PROVIDED A PRESENTATION. WE'RE GOING TO LET THE APPLICANT PRESENT AFTER THAT. AND THEN WE'LL PROCEED WITH THE REST OF THE MEETING. THANK YOU. SOMEBODY VERY TALL. SO DENA FREEMAN, COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES TEAM THAT REVIEW ALL APPLICATIONS THAT COME IN, SUBMITTED BY PROPERTY OWNERS AND APPLICANTS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. SO THE APPLICATION IS CALLED PROJECT PARROT AND IT'S BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. AND IT IS A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. AND THE ANNEXATION NUMBER IS ANNEX 25 001. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. I GOT IT WORKING. SO THIS IS THE FORMAL APPLICANT REQUEST BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION. ANNEXATION BY VOLUNTARY PETITION OF 5,722.30 ACRES OF PROPERTY. THIS IS LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF SOUTHWEST KANNER HIGHWAY AND WEST OF SOUTHWEST WARFIELD BOULEVARD, AND IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. AND HERE WE HAVE A LOCATION MAP, AND WHAT THIS SHOWS YOU IS THE EXISTING AREA OF THE VILLAGE. BOUNDARIES. MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND JURISDICTION IS DEPICTED IN RED IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION, WHICH IS DEPICTED IN BLUE EITHER SIDE OF SOUTHWEST KANNER HIGHWAY AND THE CANAL. AND OBVIOUSLY YOU SHOW SOUTHWEST FARM ROAD, WARFIELD BOULEVARD, AND THE OVERALL AREA OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN BOUNDARY. SO THIS IS TO GIVE YOU THE OVERALL LOCATION. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.AND JUST BEFORE I GET INTO THIS, I ALSO WANTED TO JUST EXPLAIN, BECAUSE ANNEXATION IS A WORD THAT NOT EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS. SO AN ANNEXATION IS AN ADDITION OF PROPERTY THAT'S NOT CURRENTLY WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. IT'S CURRENTLY WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY. SO WHAT WHAT THE REQUEST IS TODAY IS A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION IS THE APPLICANT IS ASKING TO COME INTO THE VILLAGE AND BECOME PART OF THE VILLAGE WHERE THEY'RE CURRENTLY UNDER THE
[00:05:04]
JURISDICTION, AND LAND USE AND ZONING AND ANY PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS, AS PER MARTIN COUNTY CODES. AND THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE STATUTES. THEY CAN ASK ANY ANY PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT WHO'S LOOKING TO PURCHASE PROPERTY CAN ACTUALLY ASK FOR AN ANNEXATION AS PER STATE STATUTES, AND ALSO AS PER VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN CODES, WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE STATUTES. SO WHAT THIS MAP DOES IS SHOW YOU THE EXISTING PROPERTY THAT'S OWNED ENTIRELY BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. IN RELATION TO TO THE IMMEDIATE WEST IS THE FLORIDA POWER GENERATION FACILITY, WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY A VERY SUBSTANTIAL EXISTING OPERATION WITHIN THE WESTERN AREA OF MINE COUNTY AND THE VILLAGE AND WEST OF THE VILLAGE. WE ALSO SHOW IN RELATION TO THE AREA WITHIN THE BOUNDARY WE HAVE INDUSTRIAL IMMEDIATELY NORTH, WHICH INCLUDES THE SILVER FOX, WHICH WE CURRENTLY HAVE A PRE-APPLICATION PENDING SUBMITTAL FOR A POTENTIAL PROPOSED DATA CENTER TO THE NORTH. THE EXISTING COGEN FACILITY, WHICH IS OWNED BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, WHICH IS BEING OBVIOUSLY THAT WAS TAKEN OUT OF OPERATION AND HAS BEEN REPURPOSED WITH A MULTITUDE OF THE POWER. POWER. I'VE FORGOTTEN WHAT THE TERMINOLOGY IS. POWER PACKS? YES. WHERE THEY A MULTITUDE OF USES, WHICH IS IN SUPPORT OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. WE ALSO HAVE SOME VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND WITHIN THE VILLAGE, WHICH INCLUDES THE INDIAN TOWN TECHNOLOGY AND COMMERCE PARK, A PERMIT READY PROPERTY. WE HAVE THE VENTURE PARK FURTHER NORTH, WHICH IS AN EXISTING APPROVED PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION WHICH IS ALMOST BUILT OUT. WE ALSO AND INCLUDED IN THAT ARE LIKE EAST COAST METALS, VENTURE PARK, KENDALL INDUSTRIAL, GREEN CARBON. WE HAVE P3 TECHNOLOGIES, A BOAT MANUFACTURING, A COUPLE OF SITES THAT ARE UNDER REVIEW FOR PLANNING. BUT THERE'S A LOT HAPPENING IN THAT PART OF THE VILLAGE IN TERMS OF INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. WE ALSO HAVE FURTHER EAST, WE HAVE SOME OTHER LAND THAT'S OWNED BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. THEN TO THE SOUTH IS SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OWNED PROPERTY, WHICH IS WITHIN PALM BEACH COUNTY, AND THEN TO THE WEST IS ALSO SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. PARK AND CONSERVATION LANDS. AND NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. OH, AND I FORGOT TO MENTION TERRA LAGER IS ALSO THERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT MAP. AND OBVIOUSLY THE REST OF INDIAN TOWN OFFER WARFIELD WITH COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL. ALL RIGHT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS A PROPERTY LOCATION MAP THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT JUST TO DEPICT. AND IT'S IT'S PART OF WHAT WAS THE BOUNDARY SURVEY THAT IS REQUIRED. SO WHEN THEY SUBMIT THEIR ANNEXATION APPLICATION THEY'RE PROVIDED THEY'RE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE QUITE A LOT OF INFORMATION, INCLUDING CONFIRMATION OF THE PARCEL CONTROL NUMBERS AND THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND THE BOUNDARY SURVEY TO SHOW THAT AND ALSO THE DEEDS TO SHOW THAT THEY OWN ALL OF THE PROPERTY. AND IT'S CORRECTLY SURVEYED. IT WAS REVIEWED BY OUR VILLAGE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR TO MAKE SURE THAT IT WAS CORRECT, BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S ACCURATE IN THE DEPICTION OF MOVING FORWARD. IF IT DOES GET APPROVED, THAT IT'S IT'S CORRECTLY RECORDED WITH THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION. SO WHAT WE'VE GOT HERE IS IT SHOWS THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT OWNED PROPERTY, AND IT SHOWS IT IN RELATION TO THE EXISTING TESORO AND THE POWER GENERATION FACILITY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. SO WHEN INCORPORATED THE BOUNDARY WAS DRAWN. AND THIS IS THE WITH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND THE SURVEYS. THIS IS THE EXTENT OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN AS IT IS RIGHT NOW. SO THAT WAS THAT. AND THEN THE NEXT SLIDE SHOULD SHOW YOU THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND THEN WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE IF THE ANNEXATION IS APPROVED IS THE RED LINE WOULD EXTEND AND INCORPORATE ALL OF THE THE ACREAGE THAT'S BEEN PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. SO IT JUST GIVES YOU THE OVERALL SCALE AND THE THE VISUAL IN RELATION TO THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND HERE WE GET INTO LAND USE. SO FUTURE LAND USE IS ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAPS AND THE DESIGNATIONS AS THEY ARE RIGHT NOW THERE ARE THREE DESIGNATIONS. THERE'S CONSERVATION, AGRICULTURAL AND THERE'S ALSO A DESIGNATION IN RELATION TO THE UTILITIES WITH THE THE MAJOR FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EXISTING FACILITY, WHICH IS IN THE NORTH WESTERN AREA THAT'S DEPICTED IN GRAY. AND THEN THE LIGHT, THE GREEN THAT'S THE BRIGHTER GREEN IS THE CONSERVATION DESIGNATION. NOW, THIS LAND IS OWNED BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. IT IS ACTUALLY, FROM THE SURVEY INFORMATION, AN EASEMENT,[00:10:02]
PERPETUAL EASEMENT WITH SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. SO IT IS OWNED BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. THEY ARE INCORPORATING THAT AS PART OF THEIR REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION.SO THE LAND USE FOR THAT AND THE REST OF THE GREEN, WHICH IS AGRICULTURAL, THE LAND USE MAP AS A AS A CONCURRENT APPLICATION IS A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE COLORS ON THE MAP, BECAUSE ONCE IF THEY DO BECOME PART OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, THEY HAVE TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS IN ORDER TO BE PART OF VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. AND THEY HAVE TO LOOK AT WHAT ARE THE LAND USES THAT ARE AVAILABLE THAT WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO PLAN TO BE DOING IN THE FUTURE WITH THE SITE, AND ALSO IN RELATION TO WHAT'S THE EXISTING PATTERNS OF LAND USE IMMEDIATELY ABUTTING AND ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY? AND IN THIS CASE, IF YOU SEE THE DARK GRAY THAT IS HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND THEN TO THE EAST OF THAT DARK GRAY IS A LIGHTER GRAY, WHICH IS ALL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. RIGHT NOW, IN RELATION TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SO NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS JUST A ZOOMED IN VERSION OF THAT WHICH GIVES YOU THE PUBLIC CONSERVATION IN THE GREEN AND THEN AGRICULTURAL. AND THEN IT'S ALSO GOT THE IT'S CALLED A MAJOR POWER GENERATION FACILITY MARTIN COUNTY DESIGNATION WHERE IT OVERLAPS WITH THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. EXISTING OPERATIONS. IT'S GOT ITS OWN SPECIAL LAND USE. AND THAT'S THAT'S THE SUMMARY OF THE EXISTING MARTIN COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION.
ZOOMED IN SO YOU COULD SEE THAT NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO THE PROPOSED LAND USE IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IN TERMS OF ANY KIND OF INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS. THE TWO OPTIONS ARE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL WHICH IS A MORE INTENSE 100% OF THE PROPERTY COULD BE DEVELOPED UNDER THAT.
WHEREAS THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE PROVIDES. IT'S IT'S A ONE DOWN FROM THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND PROVIDES STILL A NUMBER OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OPTIONS IS USES. BUT IT'S JUST WHEN STAFF ARE REVIEWING IT'S MORE CONSISTENT WITH THAT STEP DOWN FROM HEAVY INTO LIGHT AND CONSISTENT WITH TO THE THE NORTHEAST OF THE WITHIN THE VILLAGE AT THE MOMENT. SO THERE'S THE EXTENT OF WHAT WOULD BE THE PROPOSED LAND USE IF THE ANNEXATION. AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO EXPLAIN THAT. SO YOU UNDERSTAND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ANNEXATION REQUEST AND THE THE LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, WHICH IS A CONCURRENT APPLICATION. SO THAT'S WHY WE'VE INCLUDED THAT SLIDE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS SHOWS THE EXISTING ZONING WITH THIS BEING VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN MAP THAT SHOWS THE EXISTING ZONING IS NOT WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. SO TO THE NORTH OF THAT, IT DOES SHOW THAT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL IN THE DARKER PURPLE AND THEN THE LIGHTER PURPLE. SO WITH THE LAND USE YOU ALSO HAVE A ZONING MAP. AND SO WHEN THEY COME FORWARD WITH ANY SUBSEQUENT REQUEST TO REZONE THEIR OPTION, IF THEY REQUEST AND GET APPROVAL FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE, THEY WOULD EITHER REQUEST A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, OR THEY WILL GO FOR A REQUEST TO PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS A ALTERNATIVE TO ZONING. AND WE'VE BEEN INDICATED THROUGH COMMUNICATIONS AS PART OF THEIR APPLICATION MATERIALS THAT THEY'RE LIKELY GOING TO BE SUBMITTING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, A REZONE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, WHICH PROVIDES A LOT MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR STAFF RATHER THAN STRAIGHT ZONING. IT PROVIDES THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADD ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS AND CONDITIONS AND POLICIES. IT CAN ALSO REINFORCE SOME INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, AND WE CAN GET INTO ALL OF THE OTHER MAXIMUMS AND MINIMUMS IN TERMS OF THRESHOLDS AND IN TERMS OF PHASING OF DEVELOPMENT AND TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND A MASTER PLAN, WHICH WILL SHOW THE OVERALL MINIMUMS, MAXIMUMS AND LIST OF POTENTIAL USES. SO THAT'S WHY WE'VE SHOWN THIS SLIDE AS WELL. THANK YOU. NEXT SLIDE. AND THIS IS SHOWING THE EXISTING ZONING. THIS IS AN A-2 AGRICULTURAL OLD CATEGORY C ZONING DISTRICT FROM THE 1960S I BELIEVE. SO IT'S AN OLD CATEGORY C ZONING DISTRICT A-2. IT'S ACTUALLY NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE AGRICULTURAL LAND USE. SO THAT THAT'S JUST AN INFORMATIVE IT'S IT'S SO OLD. SO REALLY WHAT THAT WOULD BE IF IT WAS WANTING TO BE DEVELOPED WOULD BE AG 20 A. SO BUT I WANTED TO GIVE YOU THAT INFORMATION. SO YOU SEE THE ZONING IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION BOUNDARY AS IT IS IN MARTIN COUNTY TODAY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS JUST A SUMMARY OF THE REVIEW PROCESS. YOU ALL GOT A VERY DETAILED STAFF REPORT, AN APPLICATION PACKET THAT INCLUDED THE MATERIALS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. SO WHAT HAPPENED? THEY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION. THERE WAS AN INTAKE AND A COMPLETENESS REVIEW BY STAFF. IT WAS DEEMED TO BE COMPLETE BECAUSE IT PROVIDED ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT WAS REQUIRED FOR, YOU KNOW, FOR IT TO BE A COMPLETENESS REVIEW SUCCESS. AND THEN STAFF REVIEW, WHICH INCLUDES THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES, WHICH IS ENVIRONMENTAL, IT'S TRAFFIC, IT'S SURVEY, IT'S THE VILLAGE ENGINEER, IT'S PLANNING STAFF. IT'S ALSO THE PUBLIC
[00:15:07]
WORKS AND UTILITIES DIRECTOR AND MARTIN COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT. THEY REVIEW IT AS AN OVERALL REVIEW. WE ALSO HAD A TRAFFIC CONSULTANT REVIEW THIS FROM A TRAFFIC POINT OF VIEW AS A PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC CONSULTANT. SO BEFORE YOU EVEN GET TO THIS POINT WHERE WE DO A PUBLIC HEARING, WE MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION THAT WE NEED. WE REVIEW IT. IF THERE'S INFORMATION THAT'S REQUIRED AS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THEY RESUBMIT. SO BEFORE WE GET TO THIS POINT WHERE WE'RE RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL, WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY MEET THE FLORIDA STATE STATUTES, THE COMP PLAN, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THEY CORRECTLY NOTICE. SO WE GO THROUGH THE REVIEW. AND THEN WHEN WE'RE AT A POINT WHERE THEY'VE SATISFIED SATISFIED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES AS STAFF, WE THEN GO THROUGH THE NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING THE SIGNS ON SITE, THE NOTICES WITHIN 300FT. AND THAT'S ALL WITHIN OUR CODE AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANY PUBLIC HEARING. AND IT'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE STATUTES. AND WADE, AS OUR VILLAGE ATTORNEY, REVIEWS AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE DOING OUR JOB CORRECTLY AS STAFF, BUT ALSO THAT THE APPLICANT'S DONE WHAT THEY NEED TO DO WITH THE SIGNS AND THE LEGALITIES. AND THEN WHAT WE DO NEXT IS WE SCHEDULE THESE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND WE INVITE, OBVIOUSLY, WE CREATE THE AGENDAS AND WE INVITE WE NOTICE AND ADVERTISE AND INVITE THE COMMENTS. AND WE'VE GOT A ROOM FULL OF PEOPLE. SO THAT'S GREAT TO SEE BECAUSE THE PROCESS IS WORKING. SO STAFF MAKE A RECOMMENDATION AND WE'VE MADE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT BECAUSE IT ULTIMATELY WE HAVE CRITERIA TO DO TO DO WITH THE ANNEXATION.AND IT'S ULTIMATELY SO THAT THE THE PROJECT IS CONTIGUOUS. THE LAND IS CONTIGUOUS. THAT IS ULTIMATELY THERE IS A DEFINITION IN THE STATE STATUTES. IT WAS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT, BUT ULTIMATELY, IS IT ADJACENT TO AND IS IT CREATING ANY ENCLAVE? AN ENCLAVE IS WHERE IF IT WAS SURROUNDED ON FOUR SIDES BY A LAND THAT WAS OUTSIDE OF THE VILLAGE, IF IT'S WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY AND YOU COULDN'T GET ACCESS TO THAT, IT WASN'T ALREADY SERVED BY SOME EXISTING UTILITIES, WHICH WE HAVE SOME EXISTING UTILITIES AND A PIPE THROUGH THE ACTUAL CANAL RIGHT NOW. SO WE ALREADY HAVE LAND THAT'S SERVED BY THE VILLAGE AS UTILITIES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF CANA AND THE CANAL, AND FROM A CONTIGUOUS THE DEFINITION. SOME PEOPLE HAVE ASKED ABOUT WATER AND THE ROAD AND THE FACT THAT THE SITE IS SEPARATED BY THE CANAL AND SOUTHWEST CANA HIGHWAY FROM A STATE STATUTE. THERE ARE POLICIES AND THERE'S ACTUAL CRITERIA THAT EXCLUDES IF YOU HAVE A ROAD AND A CANAL THAT'S SEPARATING YOU FOR THE PURPOSES OF BEING DEFINED AS CONTIGUOUS IN TERMS OF CONNECTING THE THE ROAD AND THE CANAL ARE NOT YOU BASICALLY THAT IS NOT CLASSED AS A LEGAL SEPARATION. SO IT IS CONTIGUOUS EVEN WITH THAT SEPARATION LEGALLY, THAT'S NOT THAT MAKES IT A CONTIGUOUS REQUEST WITH THE OVERALL LAND FOR THIS PROJECT. SO I'M SUMMARIZING THE OVERALL PROCESS. WE'RE HERE TODAY WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. THE STAFF REPORT, THE APPLICANT IS GOING TO MAKE A PRESENTATION TO. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM ANYBODY WHO'S, YOU KNOW, WANTING TO MAKE COMMENT. AND OBVIOUSLY WE'RE GOING TO GET QUESTIONS FROM YOU. SO FROM A REVIEW STANCE THESE ARE THE SPECIFICS OF THE POLICIES. WE'VE GOT THE ECC ONE THAT'S 1.25. AND FLORIDA STATE STATUTES CHAPTER 171.044. SO THE PROPERTY IS SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE POLICY AS A CONTIGUOUS TO THE VILLAGE BOUNDARIES AND SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 12 THREE IN TERMS OF VILLAGE POLICY ON ANNEXATION AND CONTRACTION APPLICATIONS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR ANNEX 20 500. THE REVIEW NOW IS BEFORE USE PLANNING ZONING APPEALS BOARD OPERATING AS THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AHEAD OF CONSIDERATION BEFORE VILLAGE COUNCIL AS TWO SEPARATE PUBLIC HEARINGS. SO AT THIS POINT, THAT'S THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. WE WOULD LIKE TO INVITE THE APPLICANT AND THEIR PRESENTATION AS AS THE NEXT PART OF THIS PROCESS, I THINK, IS THAT YOU, BRIAN, OR YOU JAMIE? ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.
I'LL LET YOU GO. AND THANK YOU FOR THIS TIME. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS JAMIE GENTILE, EXECUTIVE SENIOR DIRECTOR WITH FPL DEVELOPMENT. I'M JUST GOING TO MAKE A FEW OPENING STATEMENTS AND MY COLLEAGUES TO TO TAKE YOU THROUGH SOME OF THE DETAILS, BUT WE'RE REALLY EXCITED TO BE HERE TONIGHT. THANK YOU FOR HAVING US. AS MISS FREEMAN MENTIONED, WE'RE HERE TO TO PRESENT A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. I NEED MY GLASSES FOR APPROXIMATELY 5700 ACRES INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THE AREA IS CURRENTLY USED FOR ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION, SOLAR POWER GENERATION AND AGRICULTURE. AND THIS ANNEXATION WOULD ALLOW US TO
[00:20:03]
EXPAND THOSE USES AND SUPPORT NEW INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENERGY PROJECTS. AS MISS FREEMAN POINTED OUT, WE HAVE NOT SUBMITTED A FORMAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THIS IS WE REALLY WANTED TO KIND OF MAKE SURE WE WERE GOING TO BE ABLE TO ANNEX INTO THE TO THE VILLAGE FIRST, AND THEN WE WOULD COME BACK WITH THAT AT A LATER DATE. BUT WE DO SEE THIS REQUEST AS CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUTURE INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE REGION. THE ANNEXATION IS DESIGNED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE VILLAGE'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS MISS FREEMAN POINTED OUT, AND WILL RESULT IN AN ORDERLY EXPANSION OF THE VILLAGE BOUNDARY. I'D LIKE TO TAKE THIS TIME TO INTRODUCE A COUPLE TEAM MEMBERS, BRIAN NOLAN WITH LUCIDO AND ASSOCIATES, AND BOB RAINES WITH GUNSTER, WHO'VE JOINED US HERE THIS EVENING AS PART OF OUR DEVELOPMENT TEAM. I'D ASK BRIAN TO STEP UP TO THE PODIUM TO GUIDE YOU THROUGH OUR PRESENTATION AND THE DETAILS OF OUR REQUEST. AND AGAIN, WE'RE EXCITED TO BE HERE, AND WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO ANSWERING ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE OF US. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR. MEMBERS. MY NAME IS BRIAN NOLAN WITH LUCIDO AND ASSOCIATES. FIRST, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HERE THIS EVENING AND ALSO THANK THE VILLAGE STAFF FOR ALL THEIR HARD WORK AND DEDICATION IN THIS PROCESS. THAT IS ALWAYS APPRECIATED. AND WE DO AGREE WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. DINA DID A WONDERFUL PRESENTATION, WHICH ODDLY IS VERY SIMILAR TO MINE, SO I HOPE IT DOESN'T. I HOPE IT DOESN'T BORE YOU, SO I'LL PROBABLY SPEED THROUGH MOST OF IT. SO AS IT WAS POINTED OUT, WE ARE HERE SEEKING A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5700 ACRES. I THINK WE'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH WITH WHERE IT LIES NORTH AND SOUTH OF KANNER HIGHWAY AND THE OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY. CURRENT LAND USE IS MARTIN COUNTY AGRICULTURAL, PUBLIC CONSERVATION AND MAJOR POWER GENERATION FACILITY, WITH THE CURRENT ZONING OF A TWO, WHICH DINA POINTED OUT IS A CATEGORY C ZONING DISTRICT WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A MANDATORY REZONING. SHOULD WE DO ANYTHING IN MARTIN COUNTY? AND CURRENT USES INCLUDE AN OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE CORRIDOR ALONG THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA. THE AREA NORTH OF KANNER AND THE CANAL IS MONARCH SOLAR. IT'S ABOUT 700 ACRES UP THERE. IT'S THE SOLAR FACILITY IS ABOUT 500 ACRES. AND THEN THE TRANSMISSION LINE CORRIDOR MAKES UP THE REMAINDER. SO IT'S ABOUT 700 ACRES NORTH OF THE CANAL AND ABOUT 5000 SOUTH OF THE CANAL. NEXT, PLEASE. AGAIN, WE'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH WHERE THE SITE IS LOCATED. NEXT SLIDE. AGAIN, SOME OF THE SURROUNDING USES. YOU CAN SEE THE FORMER COGEN FACILITY FOR NATURAL GAS. THE VILLAGE BOUNDARY HIGHLIGHTED. AND WE DID POINT OUT MONARCH SOLAR FACILITY THERE ON THE NORTHERN 500 OR SO ACRES, WITH THE OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE CORRIDOR ALONG THE WESTERN EDGE. NEXT SLIDE. AGAIN SHOWING SOME OF THE ADJACENCIES THERE. NEXT SLIDE. AND DINA WALKED US ALL THROUGH THE CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THIS IS YOUR LAND USE MAP OF THE VILLAGE. YOU CAN SEE THE CONTIGUITY TO THE VILLAGE BOUNDARY AND ALSO THE CONTIGUITY TO THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND PROXIMITY TO THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES ON THE NORTH. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AGAIN, THE ZONING WITH THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING AND THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING AND ALL THE SURROUNDING AG USES. NEXT SLIDE.AND THIS AGAIN IS THE COUNTY'S FUTURE LAND USE. THAT THAT DINA ALSO EXPLAINED. NEXT SLIDE AND CURRENT COUNTY ZONING. JUST THE A2 ZONING DISTRICT NEXT SLIDE. AS I THINK WE'VE DEMONSTRATED IN THE APPLICATION PACKAGE, WE ARE SUBSTANTIALLY CONTIGUOUS TO THE VILLAGE BOUNDARY. WE ARE REASONABLY COMPACT. WE ARE NOT CURRENTLY LOCATED WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY OF ANOTHER MUNICIPALITY. WE'RE FULLY WITHIN UNINCORPORATED MARTIN COUNTY. AND WE FEEL AND AS THE STAFF REPORT INDICATES, WE FEEL WE'RE WE'RE CONSISTENT WITH THE RELEVANT GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SHOULD THE ANNEXATION BE ADOPTED, IT WILL NOT CREATE AN ENCLAVE. WE FEEL IT WILL CREATE A RESULT IN AN ORDERLY EXPANSION OF THE VILLAGE'S BOUNDARY, AND IT WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EMPLOYMENT, INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE VILLAGE. AND WITH THAT, I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. HEARING NONE.
DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? NOT ME. WAS WAS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? I WOULD
[00:25:09]
JUST IS THIS ON? FIRST, I'D LIKE TO SHOW MY APPRECIATION TO STAFF BECAUSE IF YOU LOOKED AT THIS SUBMITTAL, IT GOES ON FOR DAYS. SO I HAVE TO SAY THAT VERY PROUD. AND I'D LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR THE HARD WORK THAT THE STAFF HAS PUT IN AND OBVIOUSLY FPL AND THEY'RE IN THERE AND THEY'RE PEOPLE THAT ARE HELPING THEM GET THIS DONE. I WILL SAY THIS GOING BACK A LITTLE HISTORY, YOU KNOW, IF IT WASN'T FOR FPL, INDIANTOWN NEVER WOULD HAVE BECOME INCORPORATED. FPL IS THE LARGEST TAX PAYER IN INDIANTOWN AND PROBABLY MARTIN COUNTY FOR THAT FACT. I'M OVERJOYED THAT THAT FPL HAS DECIDED TO ANNEX THIS PROPERTY INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, BECAUSE IT WILL IMMEDIATELY INCREASE OUR TAX BASE, IMMEDIATELY MAKE MORE THINGS VIABLE FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, AND THE EXCITEMENT THAT WILL COME WHEN THEY DO DEVELOP THIS SITE FOR MORE POWER GENERATION OR WHATEVER THEY PLAN ON DOING. SO, AS YOU CAN TELL, I WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS ANNEXATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU! I WOULD LIKE TO RESERVE COMMENT UNTIL WE'VE HEARD FROM THE PUBLIC IF THAT'S OKAY. YES THAT'S OKAY, SO WOULD I ANY PUBLIC COMMENT, MA'AM? THE FIRST IS MR. LAMAR WEST. GOOD EVENING. MADAM CHAIR. COUNCIL MEMBERS AND STAFF. MY NAME IS LAMAR WEATHERS AND I HAVE LIVED ON LAND ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA, AND IT'S BEEN IN MY FAMILY FOR NEARLY 100 YEARS. WHILE IT'S NEVER BEEN A LARGE FARM, MY FAMILY MAINTAINED SMALL SCALE AGRICULTURE THERE, INCLUDING CITRUS FRUIT TREES AND FOR A SHORT TIME, LIVESTOCK. WE LIVED AND CARED FOR THAT LAND ACROSS GENERATIONS. THAT HISTORY MATTERS TO ME NOT AS SENTIMENT, BUT AS STEWARDSHIP. AND I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO YOU ALL TONIGHT. I WANT TO BE CLEAR, I AM NOT OPPOSED TO PROGRESS. OVER THE YEARS, I'VE WATCHED ADJACENT LAND CHANGE FROM CITRUS TO SUGARCANE AND SOD. I UNDERSTAND THAT LAND USE EVOLVES, AND I ALSO UNDERSTAND THE PUSH FOR SOLAR ENERGY AND THE ROLE THAT IT PLAYS FOR OUR FUTURE. MY CONCERNS ARE NOT ABOUT THE SOLAR PANELS ALONE. ACCORDING TO THE VILLAGE'S OWN DOCUMENTS, THIS ANNEXATION IS INTENDED TO SUPPORT FUTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, BEGINNING WITH A SUBSTATION AND ADDITIONAL PHASES BEYOND THE INITIAL SOLAR USE. ONCE THIS LAND IS ANNEXED AND REDESIGNATED TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AGRICULTURE, PROTECTIONS ARE PERMANENTLY REMOVED AND FUTURE USES MAY INTENSIFY OVER TIME. I AM CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT THAT MEANS FOR MY QUALITY OF LIFE AND FOR MY NEIGHBORS. THAT INCLUDES THE LOSS OF RURAL VIEWS, OPEN SPACE, ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS AND POTENTIAL CHANGES TO DRAINAGE AND SOIL MOISTURE THAT AFFECT AGRICULTURAL LAND. I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT WATER. MY NEIGHBORS AND I RELY ON PRIVATE WELLS AND OUR DRINKING WATER, OR FOR OUR DRINKING WATER. AT THIS STAGE, I'VE NOT SEEN ANY AQUIFER IMPACT STUDIES, ANY GROUNDWATER MONITORING PLANS, OR A COMMITMENT TO BASE WATER OR BASELINE WELL TESTING WHEN LAND IS GRADED, COMPACTED AND DEVELOPED AT THIS SCALE, IT CAN CHANGE HOW WATER MOVES UNDERGROUND. AND THAT MATTERS WHEN YOU DEPEND ON A SHALLOW AQUIFER. I ALSO WANT TO RAISE THE ISSUE OF NOISE. SUBSTATIONS AND POTENTIAL BATTERY STORAGE FACILITIES PRODUCE CONTINUOUS, LOW FREQUENCY SOUND THAT CARRIES FARTHER IN RURAL AREAS AND IS ESPECIALLY NOTICEABLE AT NIGHT. I HAVE NOT SEEN A NOISE IMPACT STUDY. PROJECTED DECIBEL DECIBEL LEVELS AT NEARBY HOMES, OR ANY ENFORCEABLE LIMITS ADDRESSING HOW THIS WILL BE AFFECTED. EXISTING RESIDENTS OVER LONG TERM. I'M NOT HERE TO STOP PROGRESS. I'M JUST ASKING THE VILLAGE TO ENSURE THAT PROGRESS IS RESPONSIBLE, THAT CLEAR, ENFORCEABLE PROTECTIONS ARE PUT IN PLACE FOR EXISTING LANDOWNERS, FOR WATER RESOURCES AND FOR FUTURE INDUSTRIAL USES BEFORE THIS ANNEXATION MOVES FORWARD. THIS LAND IN THIS COMMUNITY EXISTED LONG BEFORE THIS PROPOSAL. I'M RESPONSIBLE ASKED THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ALREADY LIVE HERE ARE PROTECTED.AS DECISIONS ARE MADE ABOUT WHAT COMES NEXT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.
[00:30:15]
THANK YOU, VILLAGE COUNCIL. I AM CAROL MCALLISTER. I HAVE BEEN AN INDIAN TOWN RESIDENT FOR 87 YEARS. I'VE LIVED HERE A LONG TIME. MY FAMILY CAME HAS BEEN HERE OVER 100 YEARS. A WEEK AGO I FOUND AT THE ENTRANCE TO MY PROPERTY ON FARM ROAD, I FOUND A SIGN THAT'S A ZONING CHANGE. WELL, I WAS IN TOTAL SHOCK. WELL, OF COURSE IT WAS NEW YEAR'S WEEKEND AND YOU CAN'T FIND OUT A THING. I WENT ONLINE TRYING TO TO FIND OUT WHAT IN THE WORLD IS HAPPENING.SO MONDAY MORNING, WHATEVER DAY. THAT WAS THE SECOND, I GUESS IT WAS, I DON'T KNOW WHAT DAY IT WAS, BUT ANYWAY, I JUST CAME TONIGHT. I JUST REALLY WANT TO KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING AND HOW DID IT GET TO THIS PLACE. AND I KNEW NOTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE I JOINED RIGHT UP TO IT. THANK YOU. YOU. MISS MARIA ALLEN? GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR, AND COUNCIL MEMBERS AND STAFF.
THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING US TO SPEAK. I WANT TO START OFF BY SAYING THAT AGAIN, JUST AS MY NEIGHBORS ARE NOT AGAINST PROGRESS, WE UNDERSTAND PROGRESS HAPPENS. CORRECT. BUT WE WANT IT TO BE CAUTIOUS. WE WANT YOU TO ALL THINK ABOUT THE PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY. SO LET ME PUT MY GLASSES ON SO I CAN NOT MISS MY NOTES. I LIVE HERE OFF OF KANNER HIGHWAY, 300FT AWAY FROM THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH MY HUSBAND. WE HAVE A SMALL FARM WITH HORSES AND CHICKENS. WE WANT TO GROW THAT FARM AND HAVE SOME LITTLE COWS, BUT WE ARE OPPOSED TO TO THE ANNEXATION DUE TO THE DIRECT IMPACTS IN THE NEARBY RESIDENTIAL AREAS. FIRST, WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE PROPERTY VALUE AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY. THIS AREA HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL IN NATURE. INDUSTRIAL SCALE SOLAR IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SMALL RANCHES AND RESIDENCES AT THIS PROXIMITY, AND FUNDAMENTALLY ALTERS THE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY. SECONDLY, MY HOUSEHOLD, AS MY NEIGHBORS, RELY ON PRIVATE WELL.
DRAWING FROM THE FLORIDAN AQUIFER, FLORIDA LAW RECOGNIZES THE NEED TO PROTECT GROUNDWATER RECHARGE AREAS. LARGE SOLAR INSTALLATIONS REQUIRE GRADING, SOIL COMPACTION, AND STORMWATER SYSTEMS THAT CAN DISRUPT NATURAL RECHARGE. IF PANELS, WIRING, OR EQUIPMENT ARE DAMAGED, ESPECIALLY DURING HURRICANES, THERE IS A LEGITIMATE CONCERN ABOUT CHEMICAL RUNOFF ENTERING GROUNDWATER. ANY CONTAMINATION WOULD DIRECTLY AFFECT HOMES LIKE MINE THAT RELY ON THE WELL WATER. THIRDLY, THIS LAND CURRENTLY SUPPORTS LOCAL WILDLIFE. LOCAL WILDLIFE WOULD BE DISPLACED BY FENCING, VEGETATION REMOVAL AND INCREASED HUMAN ACTIVITY. FINALLY, LIVESTOCK ARE SENSITIVE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION, NOISE, GLARE, DRAINAGE ALTERATIONS AND LONG TERM SITE AVAILABILITY, AVAILABILITY OR ACTIVITY. I RESPECTFULLY ASK THE COUNCIL AND MADAM CHAIR TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANNEXATION IS APPROPRIATE BEFORE SITE SPECIFIC STUDIES ON GROUNDWATER PROTECTION, RUNOFF, WILDLIFE IMPACTS AND AGRICULTURAL COMPATIBILITY ARE COMPLETED AT A MINIMUM. THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT PROCEED WITHOUT STRONG, ENFORCEABLE PROTECTIONS FOR NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THIS MORNING. GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
DONNA CARMEN, INDIAN TOWN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AND DONNA CARMEN. AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY, LIKE MANY OF YOU AT THIS TABLE, WE GREW UP HERE AND WE'VE SEEN THE EVOLUTION, EVOLUTION OF OUR COMMUNITY CHANGE DRAMATICALLY OVER THE YEARS, OBVIOUSLY, BECAUSE I DO REPRESENT THE CHAMBER AND OUR MEMBERS. WE'RE HERE TO PROPOSE, TO PROMOTE AND SUPPORT THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY. AND I DON'T MEAN JUST THE LARGE CORPORATIONS. I'M TALKING THE SMALL BUSINESSES THAT ARE SUPPORTED BY THE LARGER CORPORATIONS AND THE EMPLOYEES THAT THEY BRING TO OUR COMMUNITY, AND NOT JUST THE INVESTMENT IN THE DOLLARS, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM REQUIRES DOLLARS. WE ALL KNOW THAT. WE KNOW THAT FPNL HAS BEEN A WONDERFUL NEIGHBOR. I CAN TELL YOU FROM THE YOUNG WOMAN, YOUNG NEWLYWED
[00:35:05]
RIGHT OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL THAT WENT TO WORK AT FIRST BANK OF INDIANTOWN WHEN THEY WERE BUILDING THE MARTIN PLANT FRIDAY NIGHT, THE EMPLOYEES LINED OUT THAT DOOR TO CASH THEIR PAYCHECKS TILL 7:00 IN THE EVENING. SO YOU CAN IMAGINE. BUT ALL I WANT TO SAY THIS EVENING IS THINK ABOUT THE EVOLUTION OF THIS COMMUNITY. WE STROVE TO BRING INCORPORATION HERE FOR A REASON, TO CHANGE OUR LIFESTYLE, TO BRING THOSE BASIC AMENITIES THAT MANY TAKE FOR GRANTED EVERY DAY. I MEAN, IF WE NEED A DOCTOR, YES, THANK GOD WE HAVE FLORIDA COMMUNITY HEALTH, BUT IF WE HAVE TO, IF OUR PARENTS REQUIRE WEEKLY BLOOD TESTS, THEY'VE GOT TO RUN TO STUART. YOU KNOW, SOMEONE IN THEIR 80S HAS NO BUSINESS BEING BEHIND THE VEHICLE. I HATE TO SAY THAT BECAUSE I'M TALKING ABOUT MY MOTHER. SHE'S 87 AND REFUSES TO GIVE UP DRIVING. NOT THAT I'M, YOU KNOW, JUST SCARES ME. BUT ANYWAY, WE ALL KNOW THAT FPNL IS VERY CONSCIENTIOUS.YOU KNOW, THAT THEY HAVE SPENT A SMALL FORTUNE JUST TO ANALYZE THE PROSPECT OF EXPANDING THEIR WORKLOAD. AND I WILL SAY ONE OTHER THING. I HAVE A SOLAR FARM IN MY BACKYARD AND IT HAS NOT BROUGHT ME ANY ISSUES WHATSOEVER. THE WILDLIFE IS ABUNDANT. IT'S THE LEAST DISTURBED PROPERTIES THAT YOU CAN IMAGINE. AND I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE GOT A CHANCE TO GO TO BARLEY BARBER SWAMP OR GO OUT TO LAKE AND FISH WHEN FPL WAS ALLOWED TO DO THAT BEFORE NINE OVER 11, BUT THEY HAVE BEEN A GOOD PARTNER. THEY'RE HERE TO SUPPORT THE COMMUNITY. THEY SUPPORT EVERY NONPROFIT IN THIS TOWN. WE WOULD NOT HAVE YMCA, WOULD NOT HAVE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB. THE CHAMBER WOULD BE LACKING SUPPORT. WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO PUT ON FIREWORKS.
FREE KIDS FISHING TOURNAMENT, THE CHRISTMAS PARADE OR ANYTHING ELSE. SO FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN OF LANDOWNER. I'M A LANDOWNER. I WAS WORRIED WHEN FPL BROUGHT THE PROSPECT UP, BUT I CAN TELL YOU WHAT, I WOULD RATHER HAVE THE SOLAR FIELD THAN THREE STORY CONDOMINIUMS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MISS PEARSON. PRITCHARD.
GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. PARDON ME. IT'S MY FIRST TIME EVER SPEAKING. BUT AS A YOUNG PERSON OF INDIAN TOWN, I FELT COMPELLED TO SPEAK. MY FAMILY HAS BEEN IN INDIAN TOWN FOR OVER 30 YEARS NOW. AS A YOUNG PERSON, I WANT TO CONTINUE AND SUSTAIN THAT. BUT UNFORTUNATELY, WITH THE WAY THIS IS GOING, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S SUSTAINABLE.
YOU GUYS, ARE WE INCORPORATED FOR A REASON? WE WANTED FREEDOM FOR OUR VILLAGERS AND BY IN MY OPINION, THIS LOOKS LIKE A SNEAKY WAY TO SELL OUT IN A WAY TO BIG CORPORATIONS. AND THIS LOOKS LIKE IT'S DOUBLING THE SIZE OF THE VILLAGE. AND WITH THAT ZONING DESIGNATION, THAT COULD BE VERY DAMAGING TO THE FEEL THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO SAY THAT INDIAN TOWN IS. SO ALSO, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE VILLAGE DOES HAVE ECONOMIC CONCERNS AND NEEDS, AND I FEEL THERE'S OTHER WAYS THAT WE CAN MAYBE GET CREATIVE IN GETTING THAT FUNDING. THERE'S MANY YOUNG PEOPLE THAT WANT TO PURSUE A RURAL LIFESTYLE. MAYBE IF WE CHANGE SOME ZONING TO HAVE MORE RANCHETTE TYPE PROPERTIES THAN THAT'S LACKING IN THE STATE, PEOPLE WOULD COME AND HAVE THAT FREEDOM THAT WE SAY THAT INDIAN TOWN HAS. IN ADDITION TO THE PRESENTATION, IT DID HIGHLIGHT THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS, BUT WHAT ARE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? I DID NOT HEAR ANY OF THE STAFF SAY WHAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS ARE OF THIS PROJECT. ONCE WE LOSE AGRICULTURAL LAND, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE RETURNED. ONCE IT'S CEMENT, IT'S NOT GOING TO GO BACK TO DIRT IN, YOU KNOW, REAP THE SOIL THAT WE ALL DEPEND ON. SO I JUST WANT YOU GUYS TO SLOW DOWN, BE MORE CAUTIOUS OF THE LONG TERM EFFECTS BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY OTHER AREAS LOCALLY. THINK OF THE BEE LINE INDUSTRIAL CENTER WHERE THERE'S WAREHOUSES OVER THERE. DO WE REALLY NEED ANOTHER ONE? ONLY, WHAT, 15, 20 MILES AWAY? JUST MAYBE WE CAN THINK OF SOMETHING ELSE AND KEEP THE SOLAR FIELDS IN THE AG LAND, BECAUSE ONCE IT'S LOST, IT'S GONE FOREVER.
SO THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I'M SORRY, I SAID. SO. ENTERTAIN COMMENTS FROM STAFF IF I COULD. OH, FROM STAFF. I'M SORRY. I MEAN, NOT
[00:40:06]
FROM STAFF. FROM WITHIN OUR BODY. I APOLOGIZE IF I JUMPED THE GUN EARLIER, BUT WHAT I, WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO REITERATE THAT THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN WOULDN'T BE THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN WITHOUT FPL SUPPORT AND THEIR TAX BASE, FPL HAS MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR US TO INCORPORATE AND MAKES ALL OF WHAT WE DO AS FAR AS BRINGING IN THE NEW UTILITIES, THE WATER, THE WATER, THE SEWER, ALL THESE THINGS ARE MADE POSSIBLE BY OUR BIGGEST TAXPAYER. AND WITH THAT SAID, I'M OVERJOYED THAT THEY'VE CHOSEN TO ANNEX INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, UNDERSTANDING THEY DON'T HAVE TO ANNEX INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. THEY DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT, GUYS. SO THEY'RE BRINGING THE TAX BASE INTO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. NOW, A LOT OF CONCERNS I'VE HEARD WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT A DEVELOPMENT TONIGHT. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ANNEXING PROPERTY IN UNDER A PARTICULAR ZONING. THE DEVELOPMENT OR WHATEVER PROJECT THEY DO BRING FORWARD WILL GO THROUGH A WHOLE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS. AND ALL THE THINGS THE CONCERNS I'VE HEARD WILL BE ADDRESSED AT THOSE TIMES. RIGHT NOW, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT ANNEXATION AND BRINGING IN THAT PROPERTY UNDER A PARTICULAR ZONING. SO WITH THAT SAID, A LOT OF THE CONCERNS, LIKE I SAY, I'LL SAY ONCE AGAIN, WILL BE ADDRESSED LATER WHEN THEY COME IN WITH A SPECIFIC PROJECT TO BE PUT ON THAT PROPERTY. AND I'LL YIELD.THAT'S GOOD. THANK YOU. I'M KIND OF OFF TOPIC. MR. WEATHERS WAS YOUR FATHER, BILL WEATHERS, I KNOW YOUR DAD KNEW YOUR DAD. I KNEW YOUR DAD THROUGH MY GRANDFATHER. THEY WERE GREAT FRIENDS. SO YOU HAVE PEOPLE HERE AND EVERYTHING THAT EVERYBODY HAS SAID. I AGREE WITH YOU. I AGREE WITH YOU. I VOTED NO FOR INCORPORATION. OKAY? BUT THAT'S THE REASON THAT I SAT ON THE COUNCIL WAS BECAUSE I'VE HEARD THE I'VE HEARD THE SENTIMENT OF WE NEED TO WORK TOGETHER. WE HAVE TO COME TOGETHER IN ORDER TO MOVE FORWARD. OKAY. AND AND DOUBLING THE SIZE OF INDIAN TOWN, THAT'S ALREADY HAPPENED WITH SOME OF THE, SOME OF THE RESIDENTIAL THAT'S GOING IN. HOWEVER, WE NEEDED THAT RESIDENTIAL BECAUSE OUR YOUNG PEOPLE DIDN'T HAVE ANY HOPE OF COMING BACK. SO THERE'S THERE'S A BALANCE. THERE'S A BALANCE. CHANGE IS HARD. YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY HAS STATED, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE NOT YOU'RE NOT AGAINST CHANGE. IT'S HARD. AND I KNOW STAFF BLESS THEIR HEARTS THEY HAVE THEY HAD TO LISTEN TO ME BECAUSE INDIAN TOWN HAS NO AGRICULTURE AND ALL THAT LAND OUT THERE. I WORKED FOR CALKINS. I WORKED FOR OLD EL ALMA AND TALQUIN THAT WAS OUT THERE ON WEST FARM ROAD FOR YEARS IN CITRUS. I HATE TO SEE IT DO ANYTHING ELSE, BUT THIS IS WHERE WE ARE. THIS IS WHERE WE ARE. AND I HAVE TO SAY, AND I HAVE TO GIVE KUDOS AND THANK FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT AND FOR WHAT THEY DO IN THE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR PROJECTS. AND I HAVE TO THANK STAFF BECAUSE THAT THAT MILES OF RESEARCH THAT THEY DO QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, ALL OF THOSE QUESTIONS BECAUSE I'VE ALREADY ASKED, OKAY, WE'RE TALKING DATA CENTERS. THAT WAS MY FIRST THING. YOU LOOKING LONG TERM AND OUR NATION IS GOING TO AND THEY'RE HAPPENING OKEECHOBEE DIFFERENT AREAS. THOSE DATA CENTERS THAT USE A LOT OF POWER USE A LOT OF WATER. SO I'VE ALREADY BEEN TALKING OKAY. IF WE DO IF THAT'S ONE OF THE POSSIBILITIES IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THAT'S GOING TO GO THAT WAY, THEN WHAT ABOUT THIS. WHAT ABOUT THAT. WHAT ABOUT WATER? BECAUSE I ASKED THE SAME AQUIFER THING. SO THOSE QUESTIONS ARE BEING ASKED AND IT WAS SAID. IT WAS SAID ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE RESPONSE, MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE RESPONSIBLE AND DOING PROTECTIONS. AND IF YOU LISTEN TO STAFF'S PRESENTATION ON ALL THE STEPS THAT THEY WENT THROUGH IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL THOSE BOXES WERE TICKED, THAT THEY LOOKED BECAUSE THEY LOOK OUT FOR THEY REALLY DO. THE PEOPLE AND THE RESIDENTS OF INDIANTOWN, NO MATTER HOW MUCH I MIGHT DISLIKE IT, I MIGHT NOT LIKE TO SEE THOSE AGRICULTURAL LANDS GO AWAY, BECAUSE THAT'S MY HERITAGE TOO. OKAY. BUT WE'RE MOVING FORWARD AND WE'RE TRYING TO FIND THE A GOOD BALANCE AND AND A GOOD USE FOR AS WE MOVE FORWARD BECAUSE AND YEAH, ONCE YOU ONCE YOU USE THOSE AG LANDS.
BUT HOWEVER THE PEOPLE THAT OWN THOSE AG LANDS. IT'S NOT PROFITABLE FOR THEM. IF YOU LOOK AT THE CITRUS THAT USED TO BE CITRUS, THEY USED TO BE ABLE TO TO SURVIVE AND LIVE OFF OF THAT. THEY CAN'T DO THAT ANYMORE. CATTLE IF YOU HAVE THIS AND YES, THAT WOULD BE PREFERABLE. BUT THOSE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT AS LANDOWNERS TO PURSUE THE USE OF THAT LAND IN
[00:45:04]
A PROFITABLE WAY. THAT'S THAT'S GOOD FOR THE COMMUNITY. HOPEFULLY YOU GET A GOOD A GOOD NEIGHBOR WHEN SOMEBODY'S DOING THAT. AND I THINK FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT HAS PROVEN THAT THEY'RE A WONDERFUL NEIGHBOR IN DOING IT. SOMETIMES YOU GET SOME THAT THAT AREN'T REAL GOOD NEIGHBORS AND THEY JUST, YOU KNOW, LIKE A BULL IN A CHINA SHOP AND MOVE FORWARD AND, YOU KNOW, JUST KIND OF TRY TO RAM IT DOWN A COMMUNITY'S THROAT. AND I THINK WITH FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, THEY HAVE PROVEN THAT THEY ARE GOOD NEIGHBORS. AND THEY THEY DO LISTEN. SO IT IS A TOUGH THING. CHANGE IS HARD. IT REALLY IS. AND I QUESTION LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN FOR THE FUTURE. AND IT MEANS AND TALKING ABOUT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A PUD.AND I ALREADY TOLD PUD. OH YOU SAY PUD PEOPLE ARE THINKING, OH, THEY'RE GOING TO COME IN AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH THE PUD. I MEAN, AUTOMATICALLY THAT'S NOT WHAT IT IS. IF YOU LISTEN TO AND TO MISS FREEMAN'S EXPLANATION OF WHAT A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS, HOW IT GIVES GREATER AVAILABILITY TO GET FINER DETAIL AND REVIEW AND REQUIREMENTS, YOU KNOW, IT GIVES A BETTER CONTROL OF INSTEAD OF JUST LETTING IT BE, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THEY HAVE TO COME BACK AND IT AND IT IT IS MORE OF A AM I GETTING THAT RIGHT? I WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M TELLING THE TRUTH HERE. DINA FREEMAN. IT'S ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS AND CRITERIA REGARDING DESIGN, ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. IF YOU'RE NOT A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, THE STRAIGHT ZONING IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. AND THERE'S A CODE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS PROVIDE A CODE. THIS IS ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT YOU WOULD ORDINARILY APPLY IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING, AND IT'S AN OPTION TO THE APPLICANT. IT DOES PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A MASTER PLAN, PHASING PLAN AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS, WHICH COULD ADDRESS A LOT OF THE COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED TODAY. AND YOU WON'T GET TO THAT POINT UNTIL YOU'VE SUBMITTED AND PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND STATEMENTS. YOU. THERE ARE SPECIFIC INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ALREADY IN THE CODE THERE TO PROTECT THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND THE OVERALL VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, THEY CALLED THE INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. THEY WOULD GO INTO THE PUD ZONING AGREEMENT, AS WOULD ANY ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS, AS WERE CONSIDERED REASONABLE AND APPROPRIATE AS PART OF THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARING WITH STAFF. SO ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES WOULD REVIEW. YOU WOULD ALSO HAVE THIRD PARTY REVIEWS BY SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, THE ARMY CORPS, THE DOT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. THERE'S LOTS OF DIFFERENT ELEMENTS, BUT THAT'S AT THE PUD STAGE AND NOT AT THE ANNEXATION AND THE REQUEST FOR A LARGE SCALE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT, WHICH IS WHY STAFF HAS NOT GONE INTO THAT DETAIL, BECAUSE AT THIS STAGE, IT'S A MUCH MORE OF AN OVERVIEW KIND OF POLICY DECISION THAN IT IS A SITE DETAILED SITE PLAN, REVIEW AND ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JUST TO MAKE THAT DISTINGUISHMENT. SO THIS IS THIS IS A FIRST STEP BECAUSE ALL THOSE OTHER THINGS TO BE HAPPENING AND EVERYBODY ELSE IS CONCERNED THAT'S THAT WILL BE COMING BACK AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN. SO IT'S NOT LIKE THIS IS IT. AND IT'S WILLY NILLY AND THEY'RE GOING TO DO WHATEVER THEY'RE GOING TO DO. IT'S, IT'S. IT'S ENCOURAGING TO ME TO KNOW THE STAFF THAT WE HAVE HERE AT THE VILLAGE, BECAUSE THEY REALLY DO CARE. YOU HAVE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN INDIAN TOWN THAT HAVE GROWN UP IN INDIAN TOWN, THAT WORK IN THAT DEPARTMENT, AND THEY REALLY CARE. I KNOW THAT MISSUS FREEMAN AND WHAT SHE DOES IN THAT WHOLE DEPARTMENT, THEY, THEY, THEY HAVE REJECTED THINGS BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T FEEL LIKE IT WAS A GOOD FIT IN THE COMMUNITY.
THINGS THAT WE DON'T HEAR ABOUT, WE DON'T KNOW, YOU KNOW, YOU GOT TO DRAW THAT CURTAIN BACK IN ORDER TO, TO SEE THOSE THINGS. THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS THAT GOES ON THAT, YOU KNOW, WE ARE SPARED. WE ARE SPARED BECAUSE THEY'VE, YOU KNOW, NIPPED IT IN THE BUD BEFORE IT'S EVER GOTTEN TO SOMEBODY WITH A SIGN WALKING AROUND OUTSIDE, YOU KNOW, SAYING, STOP THE MADNESS OR WHATEVER. SO I FEEL COMFORTABLE IN WHAT THE STAFF HAS, HAS PRESENTED TO US THIS EVENING, WHETHER I LIKE IT OR NOT, THE LANDOWNER HAS A RIGHT TO REQUEST, AND IT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW AND MAKE SURE THAT ALL THOSE BOXES HAVE BEEN TICKED. SO THAT'S WHAT I'VE GOT TO SAY. WHEN YOU HAVE TO FILL OUT A YOU HAVE TO FILL OUT A THING. I'M SORRY, I. WAS JUST GOING TO MAKE SOME COMMENTS AS WELL. OKAY. THAT'S
[00:50:04]
ALL. IN CASE YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE A COMMENT OKAY. SORRY. JUST A MINUTE. I WANT TO. SORRY.YEAH, SURE. RICHARD. HI. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. MY PUBLIC COMMENT TO ECHO OFF WHAT MY WIFE WAS SAYING WAS ONLY IT'S NOT THAT. IT'S ABOUT THE PROGRESS. IT'S ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE PARCEL BEING ANNEXED IN ONE SHOT. IT'D BE TOTALLY DIFFERENT IF FPL PROPOSED A DATA PLANT THAT WAS MAYBE 5 OR 600 ACRES. THEY WERE GOING TO BUILD THIS AND THEN THAT'S IT.
IT'S TAKING AN ENTIRE PARCEL AND THEN THE ADJACENT PARCELS NEXT TO THEM. WHAT'S GOING TO STOP THAT IN A YEAR OR TWO? WHICH THAT'S ALL I WAS SAYING TO ECHO OFF. MY WIFE SAID, OKAY.
GO AHEAD, CAN I. SORRY. AND JUST FROM SAY I'M NOT IN THAT POSITION AND I DON'T KNOW, BUT I WOULD THINK THAT BY DOING BECAUSE THEY IF YOU NOTICED IN THAT THING THAT THAT THAT MAP, THEY OWNED THE LAND OVER HERE, THEY OWNED THE LAND OVER THERE. BUT THE THING OF IT IS, IS DOING IT THIS WAY. THEY DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK. BUT IF THEY DO A PUD, THEY CAN DO THOSE ONE AT A TIME PHASE IN. AND IT'S MORE OF A CONTROLLED ISSUE, YOU KNOW. AND THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOING. EVEN THOUGH IT MAY BE ONE, YOU SAY ONE HUGE THING BY DOING A PUD AND DOING THOSE DIFFERENT PHASES. YOU HAVE THAT CONTROL AND YOU'RE GETTING MORE OF A OF A CONTROL OUT OF IT. JUST MY YOU CAN YOU CAN ACTUALLY TALK TO THE GENTLEMAN ABOUT THAT AFTERWARDS. I WOULD ENCOURAGE THAT. I'M. ANYONE ELSE. DENA FREEMAN I DON'T KNOW IF ANY OF THE PLANNING ZONING APPEALS BOARD HAVE GOT ANY COMMENTS, BUT THE APPLICANT AGENT WOULD LIKE TO RESPOND TO SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED. YES. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. MY QUESTIONS. GOOD EVENING. FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS BOB RAINS. I'M A LAND USE ATTORNEY WITH THE GUNSTER LAW FIRM, AND I'VE BEEN DOING LAND USE FOR 30 YEARS HERE IN MARTIN COUNTY AND MARTIN COUNTY RESIDENT. AND THE FIRST THING I WANT TO DO IS I WANT TO COMMEND THE NEIGHBORS WHO CAME OUT. WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING OUT. AND AGAIN, I'VE AND IT CAN GET VERY HOSTILE. IT CAN GET VERY UNCIVIL. AND I APPRECIATE THE THOUGHTFUL COMMENTS AND THE DECENCY AND THE WAY THAT IT WAS PRESENTED. I THINK IT'S VERY REFRESHING BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAPPEN THAT WAY IN A LOT OF COMMUNITIES. FPL IS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT, YOU KNOW, UNDERSTANDS THE CONCERNS OF THE NEIGHBORS. WE CERTAINLY ARE ALWAYS GOING TO TRY TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. THE PROCESS, AND I THINK YOU ALL HAVE TOUCHED ON IT AND HANDLED IT VERY WELL. THERE WILL BE A TIME AND A PLACE TO GET THOSE THINGS ADDRESSED AND THOSE CONCERNS ADDRESSED, AND THERE WILL BE A LOT MORE DEBATE ABOUT IT AT THAT POINT IN TIME. YOU KNOW, THE OTHER THING I KNOW THEY TALKED ABOUT GROUNDWATER STUDIES AND NOISE STUDIES. THIS ISN'T THE APPROPRIATE PROCESS FOR THAT. IT'S THE CRITERIA THAT WE HAVE FOR THE ANNEXATION AND ALSO THE CRITERIA FOR THE FUMA. BUT WE UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS, WE HEAR THOSE. AND WHEN WE GET TO THAT POINT IN THE PROCESS, WE'LL CERTAINLY BE DISCUSSING THOSE IN GREAT DETAIL. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT. SO AGAIN, WE APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS. WE APPRECIATE THE CIVILITY. WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. I'D LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING. THE ARGUMENT, I BELIEVE, ISN'T WHETHER OR NOT FPL IS BENEFICIAL FOR THE COMMUNITY. WE KNOW THAT THEY ARE BENEFICIAL FOR THE COMMUNITY. THEY'VE SHOWN THAT TIME AND TIME AGAIN, AND I BELIEVE THAT IN REGARDS TO THE COMMUNITY ADDRESSING THEIR CONCERNS IN REGARDS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS, I STAND IN AGREEANCE WITH YOU BECAUSE I'VE SAT ON THIS BOARD FOR FIVE PLUS YEARS. I KNOW THE PROCESS AND LIKE HOW IT TRANSPIRES OR WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE. AND I KNOW THAT AFTER THE ANNEXATION PROCESS, THE NEXT, WITHIN THE NEXT FOUR COMING PROCESSES, THEY WILL HAVE TO PROVIDE AND ADDRESS THE CONCERNS THAT YOU'VE SPOKEN ON TODAY. SO HEARING MY FELLOW BOARD, FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS, I STAND IN AGREEANCE WITH THEM AS WELL IN REGARDS TO SUPPORTING THE ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY THAT'S BEING SPOKEN ON TODAY. AND IF WE DON'T HAVE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS IN REGARDS TO THIS MATTER, I'D LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
YEAH, I WOULD MOVE FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION. I SECOND ROLL CALL. KAREN MILEY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BORN IN THE WOODS. YES. BOARD MEMBER.
[00:55:01]
HISPANIC. YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. NO. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. YES. ON TO THE[72.) ORDINANCE NO. 02-2026 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONCERNING REAL PROPERTY TOTALING 5,722.30 +/- ACRES IN SIZE, LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF SW KANNER HIGHWAY AND WEST OF WARFIELD BLVD, PARCEL IDS 32-39-38-001-006-00000-7, 32-39-38-001-012-00000-5, 32-39-38-001-018-00001-1, 32-39-38-001-024-00010-8, 32-39-38-001-029-00010-7, 32-39-38-001-034-00011-6, 32-39-38-001-039-00001-7, 09-40-38-000-000-00030-1, 03-40-38-000-000-00050-9, 10-40-38-000-000-00020-1, 15-40-38-000-000-00010-2, 22-40-38-000-000-00010-8, 27-40-38-000-000-00010-7, 11-40-38-000-000-00020-9, 14-40-38-000-000-00010-5, 23-40-38-000-000-00010-6, 26-40-38-000-000-00010-9, 03-40-38-000-000-00011-0; FROM MARTIN COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES - MAJOR POWER GENERATION FACILITIES, AGRICULTURAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT - PUBLIC CONSERVATION FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS TO THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS, SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS, CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.]
NEXT REGULAR AGENDA ITEM. ORDINANCE NUMBER ZERO TWO DASH 2026 STAFF. HELLO. DEENA FREEMAN WITH THE COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. FOR THE RECORD, I'M GOING TO GO BACK OVER TO THE PODIUM AND PRESENT, AND THIS IS FOR THE LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. I'M JUST PULLING MY STAFF REPORT, SO JUST BEAR WITH ME A MOMENT. SO, DEENA FREEMAN AND THE ANNEXATION, WITH THE RECOMMENDATION MOVING FORWARD. CONCURRENT WITH THAT, THE SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, AS WAS EXPLAINED, THIS IS CPA 25 002 AND IT IS REQUIRED CONCURRENT WITH OR TO FOLLOW AFTER THE ANNEXATION.BECAUSE THE LAND USE MAP CANNOT REMAIN WITHIN THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF MARTIN COUNTY, IT HAS TO BE CHANGED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN POLICIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. SO WE'VE GOT THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. AND A LOT OF THIS IS OBVIOUSLY THERE'S SOME DUPLICATION BECAUSE IT'S THE SAME SITE WITH A DIFFERENT PART OF THE APPLICATION REQUEST. SO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE 5,722.30 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF SOUTHWEST KANAWHA HIGHWAY AND WEST OF SOUTHWEST WARFIELD BOULEVARD, AND IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.
AND WE'VE ALREADY SHOWN THE LOCATION, BUT FOR THE RECORD, THERE'S THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH THE 18 PARCELS, INDIVIDUAL PARCELS, ALL OWNED BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT DEPICTED IN BLUE IN RELATION TO THE EXISTING VILLAGE BOUNDARY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS THE MAP THAT WAS PROVIDED WITH THE NOTATION OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS WHEN STAFF DO THEIR ANALYSIS, INCLUDING PLANNING, BUT ALSO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW IN RELATION TO THE EXISTING LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS. WE LOOK AT WHAT'S HAPPENING OUT THERE WITHIN INDIAN TOWN AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO. SO WE CALLED OUT AND IDENTIFIED THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH, WHICH INCLUDES THE FORMER COGEN SITE. AND THERE'S ALSO THE THE FORMER JUICE PLANT IS OUT THERE FURTHER NORTH AS WELL. VENTURE PARK, TOWN COMMERCE. WE'VE ALSO GOT THE INDIAN TOWN TECHNOLOGY AND COMMERCE PARK, WHICH IS A PERMIT READY PROPERTY THAT'S APPROVED FOR INDUSTRIAL AND A MULTITUDE OF OTHER LIGHT AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THERE'S THE PROPERTY LOCATION THAT'S TAKEN FROM THE BOUNDARY SURVEY, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND THE PARCEL CONTROL NUMBERS AND THE WARRANTY DEEDS THAT WERE PROVIDED TO PROVE OWNERSHIP.
NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY DEPICTED IN RED FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS WITH THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION. IF IT MOVES FORWARD AND WITH THE VILLAGE COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION, THAT WOULD BE THE THE EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING BOUNDARY OF INDIAN VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN TO INCLUDE THIS THIS LAND OWNED BY FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THERE'S THE EXISTING LAND USE. AND THIS IS WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY ON FROM A STAFF POINT OF VIEW TO PRESENT MARTIN COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS. THERE'S THREE DIFFERENT DESIGNATIONS THAT ARE THERE WITH THE POWER PLANT, THE CONSERVATION AND THE AGRICULTURAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS. SO IF THEY ARE IN A SUCCESSFUL THE ANNEXATION, THEY DO NEED TO REQUEST A LAND USE AMENDMENT. THE LAND USE AMENDMENT THAT'S BEEN REQUESTED IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS JUST THAT ZOOMED IN VERSION, PART OF THE MARTIN COUNTY EXISTING LAND USE MAP, JUST TO SHOW THE AREAS IN GREEN. I THINK IT'S LIGHT PURPLE AND DARKER GREEN. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS A PROPOSED LAND USE. THIS IS THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE. AND WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THERE IS DIFFERENT LAND USE DESIGNATIONS. AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IS ONE OF THOSE DESIGNATIONS. IT DOES CALL OUT SOME MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM THRESHOLDS IN TERMS OF OVERALL POLICY, WHAT WE CALL UMBRELLA PLANNING WITHIN THE VILLAGE AND WITHIN THE COUNTY AND WITHIN THE STATE. SO BASICALLY THERE'S A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION WITH LANGUAGE IN THE COMP PLAN. AND THEN WITHIN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THERE WILL BE THE ZONING WOULD BE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. SO WE'RE JUST SHOWING YOU THE HIERARCHY OF THE ACTUAL LIKE THE PROCEDURES AND THE ANNEXATION, THE LAND USE AND THEN THE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS. SO IT'S ALL THE NEXT STEP WOULD BE
[01:00:03]
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE AHEAD OF ANY REZONING. AND THERE'S THE EXISTING ZONING WHERE WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, IT WOULD BE NO COLOR RIGHT NOW IF IT DIDN'T GET A LAND USE AND ZONING CHANGE. AND THAT THAT'S NOT A REQUIREMENT. WE HAVE TO BY STATE STATUTE, THE APPLICANT HAS TO PROVIDE A PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATION AND THEN A SUBSEQUENT REZONING AS WELL. IT CANNOT REMAIN JUST, YOU KNOW, BLANK AND NO, NO COLORS ON THE MAPS. SO THERE'S THE EXISTING ZONING. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THERE'S THE EXISTING MARTIN COUNTY ZONING WHICH IS A2, WHICH WOULD GO AWAY AND BE REPLACED EITHER BY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OR PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING AGREEMENT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS THE PROCEDURES THAT ARE NOT DISSIMILAR TO THE ANNEXATION, WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT WE DID DO THE INTAKE AND COMPLETENESS AND MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING THEY NEEDED TO DO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE STATUTES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VILLAGE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, WAS PROVIDED AND DEEMED COMPLETE. IT WAS REVIEWED BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES AND THEN SCHEDULED FOR STAFF REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS PROVIDED IN THE AGENDA AND THEN SCHEDULED AS PER THE PUBLIC NOTICING REQUIREMENTS IN THE CODE AND IN STATE STATUTES. THE DIFFERENCE WITH THE LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IS, AND THIS IS WHERE IT MAY BE OF INTEREST FOR THE COMMUNITY THAT HAVE MADE COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER CONCERNS AROUND TRAFFIC AND OTHER ISSUES. IT IS ACTUALLY TAKEN OUT FOR CONSULTATION WITH A 30 DAY CONSULTATION PROCESS. IT'S REQUIRED BY THE STATE STATUTES. IT DOES INCLUDE DEPARTMENT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. IT WILL INCLUDE THE DEPARTMENT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND OTHER ENTITIES. AND THEY ARE THEY ALL GET NOTICE. AND IT ALSO INCLUDES MARTIN COUNTY AS WELL AS THE EXISTING MUNICIPALITY. AND THEY ARE ALL NOTICED AND REQUESTED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL COMMENT BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND THEIR EXPERTISE, AND THAT IS THEN TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION, REVIEWED BY STAFF. AND IF THERE'S ANY FOLLOW UP REQUIREMENTS, THEN THEY WILL BE COMMUNICATING THAT AND THE APPLICANT WILL AND STAFF SEPARATELY AND THEN COLLECTIVELY WOULD HAVE TO RESPOND TO THAT INFORMATION AND IT WILL NOT COME FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. NUMBER TWO, UNTIL A TIME PERIOD WHERE WE RECEIVED ALL OF THAT CONSULTATION. AND THAT WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE SEPARATE AND SECOND PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE VILLAGE COUNCIL PACKET FOR THEM TO CONSIDER NOT ONLY STAFF RECOMMENDATION, NOT ONLY THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION AND REQUEST, BUT ALSO THOSE THIRD PARTIES. SO THAT'S THE VERY IMPORTANT DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE ANNEXATION AND THE LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT.AND THEN AFTER THAT, AND THE PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER TWO, IF THEY GET TO THAT POINT, THEN ADOPTION OF AND THEN TRANSMITTAL BACK TO THE STATE OF THE ANY ANY APPROVAL OF THAT.
SO THIS IS THE SUMMARY OF THE APPROVAL CRITERIA. THERE WAS A VERY DETAILED STAFF REPORT THAT WAS PROVIDED, YOU KNOW, 30 PAGES OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, BUT IT INCLUDED ALL THE CRITERIA. IT WAS ALSO LOOKING TO BE CONSISTENT WITH MARTIN COUNTY'S REVIEW PROCESS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS. WE HAVE OUR OWN PROCESS, BUT I WANTED IT TO BE NOT DISSIMILAR TO WITH THE AMOUNT OF INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED. SO THE PRESENTATION IS A SUMMARY OF THAT, RATHER THAN GOING INTO EVERY DIFFERENT POLICY AND CRITERIA. IT WAS PART OF THE AGENDA PACKET. SO EVERYBODY'S HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ AND HAVE ACCESS TO THAT.
AND SO STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE CRITERIA IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SECTION 12 FOR COMPREHENSIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS AND SUBSECTION FOUR PROCEDURES AND FLORIDA STATE STATUTES 163.3184 AS A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT.
AND THAT WAS ALL INCLUDED IN THE REPORT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND VILLAGE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NUMBER CPA. THAT'S 25 002 FOR THE LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM. I'M SORRY IT SEEMS TO HAVE LEFT, BUT IT'S FROM THE EXISTING MARTIN COUNTY AGRICULTURAL AND CONSERVATION AND THE POWER MAJOR POWER PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS TO THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH ONE OF THE OPTIONS WITHIN THE COMP PLAN. AND THAT'S THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO DO AN ADDITIONAL PRESENTATION, AS PLANNERS, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE THAT DISSIMILAR BECAUSE WE ALL HAVE THE SAME TOOLBOX. WE ALL HAVE THE SAME CODES, THE SAME PROCEDURES TO WORK THROUGH. AND THAT'S WHY YOU'LL SEE A LOT OF SIMILARITIES, BECAUSE WE WE BASICALLY HAVE TO LOOK AT THE SAME STATE STATUTES AND COMP PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION POLICIES. SO OVER TO YOU, BRIAN AND JAMIE. NO PRESSURE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD, I'D LIKE TO THANK STAFF AGAIN FOR GOING THROUGH THE SHOCKINGLY EXHILARATING
[01:05:01]
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PACKAGE THAT WE HAD TO PUT TOGETHER. AND DINA HAD TO REVIEW. AGAIN, DINA'S PRESENTATION CLOSELY MIRRORS MINE. THE I WOULD JUST ADD THAT THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE IS THE MOST APPROPRIATE FUTURE LAND USE. WE ONLY HAVE YOUR LAND USES TO CHOOSE FROM, SO TO SPEAK. COINCIDENTALLY, AGRICULTURE IS NOT A LAND USE IN THE VILLAGE. SO AS YOU KNOW, OUR ADJACENCIES AND AND POTENTIAL FUTURE USES, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WAS WAS THE MOST APPROPRIATE. AND I'LL YIELD THE REST OF MY TIME TO PUBLIC COMMENT OR. YEAH, I'LL RESERVE. OH, AND I'LL RESERVE SOME TIME AT THE END TO MAKE ANY LAST QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS RESPONSES. THANK YOU. VERY GOOD SESSION. PUBLIC. I THINK WE HAVE OKAY. ANY DISCUSSION AMONGST THE BOARD? NO PUBLIC COMMENTS. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I WOULD MOVE THAT WE MOVE FOR STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING. I'LL SECOND ROLL CALL. AND JUST TO CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD, IT'S JUST THE LARGE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT, THE LARGE. OKAY, JUST THE LARGE COMPONENT, THE LARGE COMPONENT, CORRECT? YES, YES. REMEMBER WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER GIVES PROMISE.YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
[73.) APPLICATION NO. SP-25-016 - RESOLUTION NO. 001-2026 - A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, APPROVING APPLICATION NO. SP-25-016 FOR THE MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 10.87-ACRE +/- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING 71 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, LOCATED ON TWO PARCELS AT 16986 SW CHARLESTON STREET AND 16991 SW FARM ROAD, INDIANTOWN; AND PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS, CONDITIONS, REMEDIES, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.]
THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. NEXT AGENDA ITEM. APPLICATION SP 20 5-016. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.I'LL GO AHEAD AND KICK IT OFF. FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE HERE, WE'RE GOING TO BE CHANGING GEARS A LITTLE BIT. WE HAVE NO MORE MATTERS CONCERNING THE FPL ANNEXATION. WE'RE THE PCA IS MOVING ON TO A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF A APPLICATION NUMBER SP 25016, FOR A MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.87 ACRE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. I'M GOING TO JUST GO BRIEFLY THROUGH THE QUASI JUDICIAL SPEECH THAT YOU MAY RECALL ME DOING FROM TIME TO TIME. SO JUST AS A REMINDER FOR THE PCA AND FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, THIS APPLICATION THAT'S ABOUT TO BE HEARD IS QUASI JUDICIAL IN NATURE. WHAT THAT MEANS IS REQUIRES THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING COMPLY WITH CERTAIN PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE ESTABLISHED IN FLORIDA LAW. THEY'RE LESS FORMAL THAN, SAY, BEFORE A CIRCUIT COURT, BUT THEY STILL HAVE TO FOLLOW CERTAIN BASIC STANDARDS AND NOTICE AND DUE PROCESS. THE PCA DECISION HAS TO BE BASED ON COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. AND SO IN ANY CONSIDERATION, EITHER FROM THE APPLICANT OR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, WE WOULD ASK TO KEEP THAT IN MIND. AS MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WILL KNOW FROM THE LAST HEARINGS THAT WERE BEFORE YOU. IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMMENT CARD TO THE CLERK. AND AT THIS TIME I WOULD ACTUALLY ASK IF THERE IS ANYONE HERE, INCLUDING STAFF, BUT ALSO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC OR THE APPLICANT WHO WISH TO OFFER TESTIMONY CONCERNING THIS MATTER. I WOULD ASK THAT YOU PLEASE RISE AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND BE SWORN BY THE CLERK. THANK YOU. PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.
DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? I DO THANK YOU. AND JUST TO PUT A COUPLE THINGS ON THE RECORD VERY QUICKLY, MADAM CLERK, IS THIS ITEM BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED? YES, THE ITEM IS ADVERTISED. THE TRUTH AND AFFIDAVIT WAS INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA ITEM. FANTASTIC. DO ANY MEMBERS OF THE PCRB HAVE ANY VOTING CONFLICTS TO DECLARE CONCERNING THIS MATTER? ANY MEMBER OF THE PGA HAVE ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION TO SHARE EITHER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE APPLICANT OR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, OR A RECENT SITE VISIT. AND 24 I OWN SOME LAND RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET. YES, SIR, FROM WHERE WE'RE AT, DOES THAT DO DO YOU OWN IT ANYMORE? I SOLD IT IN 24. THEN I'M GOOD.
[01:10:01]
THEN YOU GOT NOTHING ON THAT? YES, SIR. AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, IF THERE WERE ANY, WHAT WE CALL EX PARTE COMMUNICATION, HEARING FROM FOLKS OUTSIDE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND SO ON, THAT'S PERFECTLY FINE. IT'S JUST THAT IT NEEDS TO BE DISCLOSED ON THE RECORD SO FOLKS KNOW THE TYPES OF THINGS THEY'VE HEARD AND SO ON. SO THAT'S EVERYTHING I HAVE, MADAM CHAIR, AT THIS TIME. I WILL TURN IT OVER TO STAFF FOR THE PRESENTATION. YES. GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY. DINA FREEMAN WITH THE COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND ALSO THE PLANNER FOR THE REVIEW. THIS IS A MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR HERITAGE PARK, A MAJOR SITE PLAN, BECAUSE ANYTHING OVER 50 UNITS THAT'S PROPOSED WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN HAS A THRESHOLD WHEREBY IT IS NOT A MINOR, IT IS A MAJOR SITE PLAN. AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE TONIGHT, BECAUSE THIS IS THE START OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOLLOWING STAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES. SO WE'VE GOT THE MAJOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO INDIAN TOWN NONPROFIT IS THE INCORPORATED IS THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER.AND WE HAVE A FUTURE PROPERTY A PERSON ENTITY THAT'S LOOKING TO BUY THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. SO IN TERMS OF DEEDS AND OWNERSHIP, IT IS INDIAN TOWN NONPROFIT HOUSING INCORPORATED. THEY'RE SEEKING A RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING ZONING APPEALS BOARD FOR THE HERITAGE PARK MAJOR SITE PLAN. PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 12 OF THE 12 EIGHT MAJOR SITE PLAN OF THE INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THIS IS APPLICATION NUMBER SP 25 016 AND IT'S THE HERITAGE PARK MAJOR SITE PLAN. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND HERE'S THE PROPERTY LOCATION. THIS IS THE SITE DEPICTED IN RED AS PROVIDED IN RELATION TO SOUTH CHARLESTON STREET. ALSO, DOCTOR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DRIVE. WE'VE ALSO GOT FARM ROAD TO THE FURTHEST SOUTH. WE SHOULD HAVE A ZOOMED IN MAP ON THE NEXT SLIDE, WHICH WILL HELP. THAT'S JUST TO GIVE YOU THE SITE LOCATION IN RELATION TO THE OVERALL AREA. AND THEY'RE THE AREAS DEPICTED IN BLUE FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IN RELATION TO THE RED AREA IS THE SUM OF THE EXTENT OF THE EDGE OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN BOUNDARY.
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY. SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SOUTHWEST FARM ROAD. YOU'VE GOT SOUTHWEST CHARLESTON STREET TO THE NORTH, AND RUNNING THROUGH THE PROPERTY IS SOUTHWEST.
MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR DRIVE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THERE'S THE VACANT SUBJECT PROPERTY, SOME HISTORY AND CONTEXT. THIS HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN UTILIZED BACK IN THE DAY AS A TEMPORARY SITE FOR ACCOMMODATING FEMA. AS A RESULT OF THE, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE CREATED BY HURRICANES. SO FOR SOME TIME, THIS WAS ACTUALLY USED AS A TEMPORARY SITE. AND THIS WAS DONE WHILE IT WAS WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY. AND BASICALLY THERE WAS SOME DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE OF TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION, HOUSING, ACCOMMODATION UNITS TO ACCOMMODATE DISPLACED PEOPLE THAT ARE IN NEED DURING JUST IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE HURRICANES. SO WHAT THAT SHOWS YOU IS THE VACANT LAND AND THAT IT'S CLEARED SUBSTANTIALLY CLEARED BECAUSE IT WAS ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW, A DEVELOPED PROPERTY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS SHOWING THE LAND USE. WE TALKED ABOUT LAND USE AND THE LAST APPLICATION THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP IS URBAN RESIDENTIAL OFFICE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
AND WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THERE IS SOME LANGUAGE THAT PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE VISION AND THE INTENT OF THAT LAND USE. ONE OF THE KEY IMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF THAT IS THAT IT DOES ESTABLISH MAXIMUM DENSITY OF UP TO 15 UNITS PER ACRE IN THE ACTUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ANY PROPERTY THAT'S GOT A LAND USE OF URBAN RESIDENTIAL. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND WHAT THIS IS IS THE ZONING MAP. AND THIS IS THE EXISTING ZONING. IT'S A STRAIGHT ZONING. IT'S NOT A PLANNED UNIT. DEVELOPMENT IS A NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT. SO WITHIN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN, THERE ARE THEN A SET OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND PERMITTED USES THAT ARE GOVERNED BY WHAT IS THE ZONING. SO FROM A STAFF POINT OF VIEW, THE REVIEW IS THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT. SO WHAT ARE THE PERMITTED USES? WHAT ARE THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND HOW SHOULD THIS SITE BE SUBMITTED IN TERMS OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL AND GET TO A POINT WHERE IT'S BEFORE YOU TODAY AND CONSISTENT AND DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND PERMITTED USES AND ANY OTHER DESIGN CRITERIA THAT'S APPLICABLE TO A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT? SO WHAT WE'VE GOT THERE IS WE'VE GOT THE AREA DEPICTED AS NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE. THERE IS A WE'LL SHOW YOU A MAP LATER THAT SHOWS THE WIDER AREA OF NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE WITHIN THE BOOKER PARK AREA. SO NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO WHAT WE'VE GOT HERE AND IT WAS INCLUDED IN THE
[01:15:07]
PACKET. AND IT'S HARD TO FIT IT ON A SCREEN BECAUSE THE SITE PLANS ARE PRETTY BIG. BUT WHAT STAFF ARE LOOKING FOR NOT ONLY THE PLANNING SIDE BUT ALSO AN ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS, UTILITIES, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, WHICH IS MARTIN COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL DOUG CULLEN, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, THE BOUNDARY SURVEY REVIEW, THE TRAFFIC REVIEWS, WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR ON THE SITE PLAN AND THE SUPPORTING INFORMATION IS ENOUGH DATA TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE ZONING. SO WHAT WE HAVE ON HERE, AND THEY DON'T AT THIS POINT GET INTO THE DETAILED DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF INDIVIDUAL LOTS, BUT WHAT THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE IS A TYPICAL LOT SIZE. IT HAS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION, AND IN THIS CASE, THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE AND STANDARDS ARE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL USE, WHICH IS DETERMINED AND DEPICTED ON THE MAJOR SITE PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, IS A MINIMUM SIZE, SHOULD BE A 40 FOOT LOT WIDTH AND 100FT DEPTH, SO A MINIMUM FOR SINGLE FAMILY UNITS WILL BE A 4000 SQUARE FOOT LOT. AND WITHIN THAT THERE ARE ALSO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE INCLUDED, WHICH INCLUDE THE PARKING DATA WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO PARKING SPACES PER ACTUAL LOT. AND THAT'S STRAIGHT FROM THE ZONING CODE AND THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. THERE ARE ALSO SETBACKS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE SETBACKS FOR THE FRONT ARE ZERO IS THE MINIMUM AND 20FT IS THE MAXIMUM, AND THEN THE SIDES AND REAR ARE FIVE FEET. SO WHAT STAFF HAVE TO DO AND WHAT THE APPLICANT HAS TO DO TO SUBMIT AND GO THROUGH A COMPLETENESS REVIEW.AND THEN MULTIPLE ROUNDS OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES REVIEWS IS DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE UNDERLYING STRAIGHT ZONING CODES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE POLICIES. SO ALL THE INFORMATION ON THERE HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY STAFF AND AND ALSO BY THE VILLAGE ENGINEER IN TERMS OF THE EXISTING ACCESS POINTS AND THE CIRCULATION FIRE. LOOK AT THE AUTO TURN ANALYSIS AND MAKE SURE THAT IT'S A FROM A FIRE LIFE SAFETY POINT OF VIEW. IT CAN BE ACCESSIBLE IN THE TURNAROUNDS. THERE ARE TRIANGLES ON THERE THAT ARE THE SITE TRIANGLES. SO FROM A SAFETY POINT OF VIEW AND FROM A LOGISTIC AND OVERALL USE OF THE PROPERTY AS A SUBDIVISION, THERE ARE A LOT OF REVIEWS THAT GO INTO PLACE AHEAD OF IT COMING BEFORE YOU GUYS AS THE PLANNING, ZONING APPEALS BOARD AND RECOMMENDATION IS PROVIDED BY STAFF AND COMMENTS. AND I CAN LET YOU KNOW THAT THE APPLICANT HAD FOUR SUBMITTALS. THEY HAD, SORRY, THREE PLUS ONE, THE COMPLETENESS REVIEW. SO THERE WAS FOUR ROUNDS OF REVIEW IN THIS BEFORE THEY GOT TO A POINT WHERE THEY DEMONSTRATED COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODES. AND THAT WAS BACK AND FORTH AND A LOT OF MEETINGS AND UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THEY NEEDED TO DO IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, SAFETY, ANY KIND OF ELEMENT OF MINIMUM LOT SIZE, ACCESS, SIDEWALKS AND SUCH FORTH. SO I'M TRYING TO GIVE YOU A SUMMARY OF A VERY COMPLEX AND IN-DEPTH PROCESS THAT WE GO THROUGH AHEAD OF IT ACTUALLY GETTING HERE, AND IT WOULD NOT GET TO THIS POINT IF THERE HADN'T SATISFIED FROM A REVIEW BY THOSE PROFESSIONALS OF ALL THE CRITERIA AND THE CODE, BECAUSE WE WOULD NOT OR IT WOULD IF THEY ASKED TO, IT WOULD BE COMING WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF A DENIAL IF THEY HADN'T SATISFIED ALL THE CRITERIA. SO WE'RE IN THE POSITION WHERE THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED. ALSO, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORTS, TRAFFIC REPORTS, SURVEYS, LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND A WHOLE HOST OF NARRATIVES AND A LANDSCAPE PLAN HAS ALSO BEEN PROVIDED BECAUSE ALTHOUGH THIS SITE IS CLEARED, THEY'RE ACTUALLY REQUIRED TO PUT TREES BACK ON THERE. SO SOME OF THE BUFFERS AND THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS WERE ALSO REVIEWED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. COLLEAGUES ANALYSIS NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. THERE'S BEEN SOME INQUIRY REGARDING THE ACTUAL ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED FLOOR PLANS. THEY WERE NOT ORIGINALLY INCLUDED IN THE PRESENTATION BECAUSE FROM A STAFF POINT OF VIEW, IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT FROM A FLORIDA STATE STATUTE STANCE, WE AS STAFF CANNOT REQUIRE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS AND WE CANNOT APPLY ANY CODE RELATING TO THE DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS BECAUSE STATE STATUTE DOESN'T ALLOW LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO MANDATE THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS FOR A SINGLE FAMILY IN A DUPLEX HOME. SO THAT'S WE'VE PUT THESE IN BECAUSE D.R. HORTON IS THE, THE THE ENTITY THAT ARE LOOKING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY AND DEVELOP THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS. AND THEY HAVE PROVIDED US THE INITIAL ROUND OF REVIEW. THIS IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IN TERMS OF MODELS. BUT FROM A STAFF POINT OF VIEW AND ANY LEGALITIES, WE CANNOT INCLUDE THESE IN ANY APPROVAL OR CONDITION OF APPROVAL BECAUSE WE ARE NOT ALLOWED BY THE STATE STATUTE TO MANDATE ACTUALLY THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS AT THIS POINT. SO THEN WHAT WE'VE DONE, THOUGH, IS SHOW YOU THE DIFFERENT MODELS THAT WERE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. AND THIS INCLUDES OBVIOUSLY IT'S CALLED THE DEVON MODEL. AND THEY CAN THEY CAN PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILS. BUT ULTIMATELY THIS IS MORE OF A SHOW AND TELL THAN THIS CAN BE APPROVED. IT'S JUST INFORMATION TO SHOW YOU WHAT IT MAY LOOK LIKE. AND AGAIN THIS IS A DIFFERENT MODEL CALLED THE CAMERON. NEXT SLIDE. AND
[01:20:03]
THERE'S THE AVON MODEL. AND THESE AND THE APPLICANTS AGENTS CAN GO INTO THE DETAILS. BUT ULTIMATELY IT SHOWS THE FLOOR PLANS IN THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS THEY'RE LOOKING TO DO POTENTIALLY ON THE PROPERTY. AND THEN WHAT I'VE ALSO DONE IS ADDED A COUPLE OF SLIDES. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND WHAT THIS DOES IS THERE'S BEEN SOME QUESTIONS REGARDING THE OVERALL SCALE OF THE PROJECT AND THE DENSITY PROPOSED. THE DENSITY PROPOSED ON THIS PROJECT. I NEED TO MAKE SURE I GET IT RIGHT, BUT I THINK IT'S FIVE POINT SOMETHING ACRES. SORRY FIVE POINT SOMETHING UNITS. LET ME JUST CHECK. IT'S A 10.87 ACRE PROPERTY. AND WITHIN WITH THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE ZONING, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO GO UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 15 UNITS PER ACRE, 6.5 I'M SORRY, I BUTCHERED THAT ONE. I IT WAS REVIEWED AND IN THE ACTUAL DETAILED STAFF REPORT, WE PROVIDED THE ANALYSIS TO SHOW THAT THEY COULD ACTUALLY BUILD UP TO 150 UNITS. THE PROPOSED USE ON THE SITE AND THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF UNITS IS 71 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. AND ONCE, IF AND WHEN THEY GET APPROVAL FOR THE MAJOR SITE PLAN, THEY WILL THEN SUBSEQUENTLY COME IN FOR ANY POST-APPROVAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, AND THAT ULTIMATELY THE BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT. EACH ONE OF THOSE LOTS WILL NEED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SETBACKS. MINIMUM, MAXIMUM, PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS HEIGHT AND OVERALL LAYOUT IN RELATION TO THE SITE PLAN APPROVED. SO AT THIS STAGE, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THE REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN IN TERMS OF PLACEMENT OF THOSE HOUSES ON EACH LOT, BECAUSE THAT WILL COME AT THE BUILDING PERMIT STAGE. IT'S JUST OVERALL LOT DEVELOPMENT, MINIMUM MAXIMUM THRESHOLDS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. SO THE DENSITY ON THIS 71 UNITS AND THE WHAT WE DID WITH THIS, I PROVIDED THIS MAP SO THAT YOU COULD ZOOM OUT AND LOOK AT THE OVERALL CONTEXT AND THE EXISTING PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THIS PART OF THE VILLAGE. AND A LOT OF THE LOTS ARE ARE SMALL AND THEY'VE EVOLVED. AND IN A PLANNING TERMS, IT'S A VERY QUAINT AND ACTUALLY AN INCREDIBLY SUSTAINABLE USE OF DEVELOPMENT, USE OF PROPERTY WITHIN INDIAN TOWN WHEREBY THERE'S NOT THIS IS NOT SPRAWL, THIS IS NOT SUBDIVISIONS. THIS IS THE EVOLUTION OF INDIAN TOWN WITH VERY SMALL LOTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF VERY SMALL HOUSES IN EFFECT. SO WHEN THE LAND USE AND ZONING WAS ATTACHED TO THIS PROPERTY AFTER INCORPORATION, THE PROFESSIONALS WHEN THEY DID THEIR REVIEW WOULD HAVE LOOKED AT THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS, THE SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT, AND THE INTENT OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HOUSING WITHIN THIS AREA OF INDIAN TOWN. WE DO HAVE MORE DENSE DEVELOPMENT THAN THE DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE UPTOWN AREA OF INDIAN TOWN, AT 20 UNITS PER ACRE IN A LOT OF AREAS WITHIN INDIAN TOWN, 15 UNITS PER ACRE, AND THE LOT SIZE MINIMUM OF 4000 FOR A SINGLE FAMILY WAS LOOKING AT THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS. BUT IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT OTHER USES THAT ARE PERMITTED FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE UNDER THE ZONING PERMITTED USE INCLUDE APARTMENTS, TOWNHOMES, DUPLEXES, AND BASICALLY, DUPLEXES CAN GO AS SMALL AS 2000FT■S IN TERMS OF LOT SIZE. O WHEN THE CODES WERE ADOPTED AND THE LAND USE AND ZONING WERE IN PLACE, OR THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, WHAT STAFF HAS AS THE TOOLBOX TO REVIEW ARE THE ZONING STANDARDS. AND WHAT WE DID IS WE REVIEWED THEM AGAINST THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DETERMINED THAT OBVIOUSLY, THE 71 UNITS IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN COULD BE IF THEY WANTED TO GO WITH APARTMENTS OR TOWNHOMES OR DUPLEXES, AS OPPOSED TO A SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. AND AND JUST ONE OTHER THING TO CLARIFY, THERE WAS A PRE-APPLICATION, I BELIEVE IT WAS IN NOVEMBER 24TH. IT'S TIME. IT'S TIME'S GONE REALLY QUICKLY. OVER A YEAR AGO, AND THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENTS HAD PROVIDED INFORMATION ON THE HISTORY OF THE SITE. IT WAS WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY. THEY TALKED ABOUT THE APPROVED NUMBER OF UNITS WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. WHEN STAFF, MYSELF, AS THE PLANNER, REVIEWED ANY HISTORY WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY, IT ACTUALLY IDENTIFIED AND PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT CONFIRMATION THAT THIS WAS NOT APPROVED AS A SITE PLAN FOR AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. THERE'S NO RECORDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND IT WENT THROUGH SUBMITTALS BUT NEVER GOT TO A POINT OF APPROVAL. SO IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT AND THAT ASSISTED LIVING IS A PERMITTED USE, AS ARE ALL THE OTHERS THAT I JUST TALKED ABOUT. BUT THE APPLICANT, WE CAN'T AS STAFF, WE CANNOT MAKE THEM PROVIDE A USE JUST BECAUSE IT'S IN THAT PERMITTED USE TABLE. THAT PERMITTED USE TABLE PROVIDES A LIST OF USES THAT THEY CAN LOOK TO CHOOSE TO PROPOSE ON THAT PROPERTY. SO THAT'S AN IMPORTANT NOTE TO TO MAKE IN RELATION TO THE REVIEW. AND IT WAS CLARIFIED AND IT'S PUBLIC[01:25:06]
RECORD THAT IN THE IN THE PRE-APPLICATION STAGE WE RECOGNIZED THAT THAT ACTUALLY IS NEVER A GOOD SITE PLAN. SO MOVING FORWARD THEY CAME FORWARD WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THE LOTS. SO NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND FINAL SLIDE IS THE THIS IS THE JUST AN AERIAL THAT JUST SHOWS YOU SOME OF THOSE LOT SIZES. SOME OF THEM ARE AVERAGING AROUND 40FT, SOME ARE 48, SOME ARE LESS THAN 40FT. BUT ULTIMATELY YOU HAVE A PATCHWORK OF DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS THAT ARE ALREADY ESTABLISHED IN THIS PART OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. AND WHEN STAFF PROVIDED THEIR ANALYSIS AND THE DETAILED STAFF REPORT, THAT WAS ALL TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. AND THAT'S THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL. HAVING REVIEWED HIS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES, IT'S IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 12 EIGHT MAJOR SITE PLAN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE INTAKE, THE MATERIALS, THE REVIEWS WERE ALL COMPLETED AHEAD OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND IT WAS CORRECTLY NOTICED, AS WAS CONFIRMED BY THE VILLAGE CLERK. SO STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE NEXT SLIDE IS THAT IT QUALIFIES FOR APPROVAL. IT WAS CORRECTLY ADVERTISED. IT'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12 EIGHT OF THE MAJOR SITE PLAN REVIEW CODES, AND WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS. SP 25 016 HERITAGE PARK MAJOR SITE PLAN. AND THAT'S THE END OF PRESENTATION. AND WE CAN HAND IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT IF THAT'S OKAY WITH YOU ALL. THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU DO. YOU.OKAY. THANK YOU. SO GOOD EVENING. I'M LAUREN MCCLELLAN WITH JAY MORTON, PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. AND I'M PRESENTING THE HERITAGE PARK APPLICATION. I'M GOING TO TRY NOT TO DO A LOT OF THE DOUBLING UP. DINA DID A GREAT JOB PRESENTING THE PROJECT. SO ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT, D.R. HORTON, WITH ME TODAY IS DARLENE DE PAULA JONES AND KEITH LEONARD, WITH D.R. HORTON, AS WELL AS GABE BURTON WITH CIVIL DESIGN, THE CIVIL ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT. OKAY, SO DEAN ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THE LOCATION. THE PROPERTY IS 10.87 ACRES. IT'S LOCATED BETWEEN SOUTHWEST FARM AND. AND. YES. THANK YOU. ROADS.
AND IT WAS PREVIOUSLY UTILIZED AS A FEMA HOUSING SITE. YOU CAN SEE THE ROADS ARE THERE FROM THAT FROM THAT IT'S BEEN CLEARED. IT KIND OF LOOKS ALREADY LIKE A SUBDIVISION. IF YOU CAN GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. THANK YOU. SHE ALSO TALKED ABOUT THIS IS THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP. SO IT IS DESIGNATED AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL OFFICE WHICH DOES ALLOW FOR MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 15 UNITS PER ACRE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THEN THE ZONING IS NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THANK YOU. SO THIS IS THE SITE PLAN. IT'S RENDERED JUST TO MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT EASIER TO READ THAN ALL THE BLACK AND WHITE LINES ON THE PAPER. SO YOU CAN SEE WE'VE GOT 71 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON THERE. WE'VE GOT THE ROADS TRAVERSING THROUGH THE SITE, CONNECTING TO SOUTHWEST CHARLESTON STREET AS WELL AS FARM ROAD. WE ALSO HAVE A CONNECTION TO SOUTHWEST 1/73 AVENUE. IT'S VERY CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE AREA. WE DO HAVE IN THE CENTER OF THE SITE, IN THE DARKER GREEN, THERE'S AN EXISTING LIFT STATION IN THAT AREA, AND THAT IS WHERE WE HAVE DECIDED TO LOCATE OUR MAIL KIOSK, AS WELL AS OUR COMMON OPEN AREA FOR FOR THE PROPERTY. I JUST WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE THE BUFFERS REALLY QUICK. THANK YOU. SO ON THE BUFFERS ON THE PROPERTY, WE'RE USING MATERIALS SUCH AS LIVE OAK, GREEN BUTTON WOODS AND COCOA PLUMS ON THE SIDE ADJACENT TO BOOKER PARK. WE HAVE ALSO INCLUDED A FENCE.
WE HAVE INCLUDED STREET TREES WITHIN THE PROJECT A1 HOLLY AND THEN AT THE PROJECT ENTRIES WHERE THE STREETS INTERSECT WITH WITH CHARLESTON AS WELL AS WITH SOUTHWEST FARM. WE HAVE LITTLE FOCAL POINTS AT THE CORNERS WHICH ARE COMPRISED OF SABAL PALMS, SOME QUEEN EMMA CRINUM LILIES, AND DWARF FAKAHATCHEE GRASS, AND THEN AT THE COMMON AREA WE HAVE SOME COLOR, WE HAVE PINK AS WELL. AS WE'RE SCREENING THAT EXISTING LIFT STATION WITH A SMALL LEAF CLUSIA HEDGE. NEXT, PLEASE. SO JUST TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON THE ARCHITECTURE, WHEN WE FIRST SUBMITTED, DOCTOR HAD COMPLETELY NAILED DOWN EXACTLY WHAT UNITS, WHAT MODELS THEY WERE GOING TO USE ON THE SITE. SO I GOT THESE FROM DOCTOR AS RECENTLY AS THIS WEEK. SO IT
[01:30:01]
LOOKS LIKE THEY'RE REALLY MOVING FORWARD AND NAILING DOWN WHAT THEIR WHAT THEIR MODELS ARE. SO THIS IS THE CAMERON MODEL. IT IS A THREE. OH THE CAMERON IS YES THE CAMERON IS A42. SO THE CAMERON IS A424 BEDROOM TWO BATHROOM. AND THEN IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT ONE THERE'S TWO FACADES FOR THIS. THIS IS JUST ONE OF THE ELEVATIONS. AND THAT ONE DIDN'T WORK. OH THAT MAKES ME SAD. OKAY. SO THE GREENBRIER, WHICH DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THAT. I PROMISE IT LOOKS BETTER. IT HAS TWO FACADES SO THAT THAT IS A THREE BEDROOM, TWO BATHROOM HOUSE. SO IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT, PLEASE. THANK YOU. SO JUST TO CONCLUDE, THIS APPLICATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE VILLAGE CODE. IT'S CONSISTENT COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. IT DOES NOT PRESENT ANY ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE NATURAL MANMADE ENVIRONMENT. WE'RE ACTUALLY PLANTING MORE VEGETATION THAN WHAT'S THERE TODAY. AND IT DOES PROVIDE A FAVORABLE ECONOMIC IMPACT ON THE ON THE VILLAGE. THERE'S ADEQUATE FACILITIES AND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THESE 71 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS. AND WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. WE'RE HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? YES, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS, MR. WILLIAMS. I'M FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA. VERY MUCH SO. AND I'M NOT AGAINST THIS. AND I'M NOT AGAINST THE 71 HOMES ARE THAT ARE GOING TO BE BUILT. I'M CONCERNED WITH THE WAY THAT THEY WILL BE BUILT OR POSITIONED. I'M SORRY. CAN YOU PULL THE MICROPHONE CLOSER TO YOUR MOUTH, PLEASE? MARTIN LUTHER KING RUNS ALONG. MARTIN LUTHER KING RUNS NORTH AND SOUTH. THE AREA WHERE THE HOMES ARE BEING BUILT ARE TO YOUR LEFT, WHICH IS MORE TO YOUR EAST OFF OF MARTIN LUTHER KING. AS MISS FREEMAN SAID. FEMA HAD A LOT TO DO WITH IT DURING THAT ERA. AND 30 TO 35% OF YOUR GROUNDWORK IS ALREADY DONE. I JUST HOPE THAT THE HOMES ARE, IF IT'S APPROVED, IT'S WHAT YOU SAY THEY ARE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION ON THERE COULD HAVE BEEN UP TO 15 UNITS PER ACRE. HOWEVER THERE'S ONLY GOING TO BE 71, SO THAT'S ABOUT LESS THAN HALF THAN WHAT IS ALLOWABLE. AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS, IT SEEMS TO BE VERY CONSISTENT WITH WITH THE WITH THE POSITIONING AND THE WAY THAT THE FEEL AND THE LOOK OF IT. TALKING ABOUT A. A, A FACILITY, A NURSING HOME FACILITY ON IT, I THERE'S SOME IN THIS ROOM WILL REMEMBER THAT AT AT ONE POINT IN IN OUR RECENT HISTORY THAT WE HAD GRANT MONEY FROM I THINK IT WAS BROWNFIELD GRANT MONEY AND THAT ALLOWED US TO, I GUESS, GET A, A AN EXERCISE ON PROPOSING WHAT THAT NEIGHBORHOOD COULD LOOK LIKE. AND AT THE END OF THAT EXERCISE, ALL THE THINGS THAT WERE PROPOSED. AND I REMEMBER GOING TO THE GOING TO MOUNT ZION WHENEVER THAT WAS, IT WAS UNVEILED AND WAS ABLE TO LOOK AT IT AND, AND SEE ALL THE THINGS THAT WERE POSSIBILITIES THAT COULD HAPPEN IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. AT THE END OF THE DAY, THOUGH, IT WAS IT WAS AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY AS WHAT I SAID, BECAUSE THAT WAS ALL PRIVATE LAND AND THE VILLAGE COULDN'T DO ANY OF THAT WITH IT.IT'S UP TO THE THE LANDOWNER. SO I THINK MAYBE THAT IS WHERE THAT MAY HAVE COME IN, IS WHENEVER WE DID THAT EXERCISE AND IT SHOWED THE POSSIBILITIES THAT THAT'S WHERE THAT TURNED UP. AND THAT'S THE REASON PEOPLE ARE THINKING, WELL, YOU KNOW, WHILE IT WAS PROPOSED AT
[01:35:01]
ONE POINT, IT IT MAY HAVE COME OUT, YOU KNOW, THAT THAT WOULD A POSSIBILITY BECAUSE IT WAS ZONED FOR THAT. YOU COULD HAVE THAT THERE. BUT I DON'T THINK IT WAS EVER PUT FORTH AS THIS WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. SO I THINK MAYBE THAT'S WHERE THAT THAT LITTLE RUB IS. AND MY ONLY QUESTION IS WATER. WATER CAPACITY, THE AVAILABILITY FOR THIS PROJECT. DO YOU WANT TO DO IT? YEAH, PLEASE. THANK YOU. SHARON. CHRISTA, FOR THE RECORD, THEY HAD THE WATER BEFORE. OKAY.AND THE UTILITY STAFF FOR THE VILLAGE HAVE GONE OUT AND VERIFIED THAT THE METERS ARE THERE. OKAY. SO THEY'RE THEY'RE WITHIN THE CAPACITY THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION. SO ARE YOU SAYING SO ARE THERE ANY CURRENT. PROJECTS, SPECIFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS THAT WAS DONE IN REGARDS TO WATER, SEWER AND FIRE FLOW CAPACITY? YES, MA'AM.
THAT WAS DONE SHORTLY AFTER I GOT HERE AND WE HAD A NEW ENGINEER. WE ASKED TOM JENSEN AND HIS TEAM TO DO THAT TO THIS PROJECT IS MY QUESTION. NO, NOT FOR THIS PROJECT. WE DIDN'T NEED TO BECAUSE THE THE TEAM WENT OUT AND VERIFIED THE METERS WERE THERE. THEY'RE FUNCTIONAL. AND SO THEY THEY WERE ALREADY INCLUDED IN OUR CALCULATIONS FOR CAPACITY PREVIOUSLY. THEY HAVE WATER AND SEWER. AND TYRONE FREEMAN CAN JUST VERIFY THAT THE FIRE MARSHAL, DOUG CULLEN, WOULD REVIEWED AND DETERMINED THAT IT WOULDN'T BE MOVING FORWARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL WITHOUT HIM IDENTIFYING THE FIRE FLOW IS ACCEPTABLE AND THE WATER, THE WATER AND SEWER WOULD HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY OUR PUBLIC WORKS UTILITIES DIRECTOR, PAT NOLAN, AND ALSO WITH TOM JENSEN AS VILLAGE ENGINEER. SO THEY SUBMIT VERY DETAILED CIVIL PLANS, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, STORMWATER REPORTS AND ALL SORTS OF DIFFERENT ANALYSIS THAT HAS TO BE PROVIDED AND REVIEWED AND ACCEPTED AHEAD OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. AND WAS THAT INFORMATION PROVIDED TO US IN THE WEALTH OF INFORMATION THAT WE GOT? BECAUSE I DON'T REMEMBER SEEING IT, THE APPLICATION PACKET, I BELIEVE THAT WE DID SUBMIT THE APPLICATION. YEAH, YEAH, WE GOT THE BOOK RIGHT HERE. IF YOU WANT, IF YOU GOT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, DENA FREEMAN THEN I'M JUST GOING TO LOOK AT THAT IN THE AGENDA AND RESPOND WHILE THEY RESEARCH THAT INFORMATION. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? YES, MR. MAYOR. HEY, THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME TONIGHT. I'VE BEEN LIVING IN TOWN FOR 25 YEARS. I LIVE IN THE BOOK PARK COMMUNITY. MY MY CONCERN IS THAT WE'RE PROBABLY LOOKING AT 100 PLUS OR MINUS MORE VEHICLES ON FARM ROAD OR MARTIN LUTHER KING DRIVE. IT'S ALREADY CONGESTED, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE TRAIN BLOCKS THE RAILROAD TRACKS. IT GETS REALLY DIFFICULT, SO I'M JUST CONCERNED ON THAT ASPECT OF HOW MANY MORE VEHICLES WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ON THE ROADS THERE. NOW.
ANOTHER QUESTION, TOO, IS I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS GOING TO BE AN HOA COMMUNITY AND HOW MUCH ACCESS DO WE HAVE WITH MARTIN LUTHER KING DRIVE BECOMING AS A WAY TO DRIVE TO FARM ROAD? BECAUSE IF THAT DOES GET BLOCKED, THEN WE HAVE TO GO ON CHARLESTON, COME ON TO 1/69 AND THAT CAN CREATE SOME SOME HEAVY TRAFFIC ON THAT ROAD TO GET ONTO FARM ROAD TO HEAD INTO TOWN. SO THAT'S MY CONCERN TOO. I MEAN, RIGHT NOW, I LOVE THAT AREA BECAUSE WE DO SEE A LOT OF FAMILIES DO WALK AROUND THAT PROPERTY. YOU KNOW, THEY PLAY. I'VE SEEN THEM PLAY. I'VE SEEN THEM WALK THEIR DOGS. I'VE SEEN THEM DO DO A LOT OF STUFF. AND THESE HOMES ARE GOING TO BE VERY SMALL PROPERTIES. AND THE PARK NEXT TO IT IS NOT I DON'T THINK WE'RE READY FOR IT. I THINK WE'RE GOING TO NEED TO ADD MORE PARKS OR A PARK FOR IT, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO PLAY IN THE BACKYARD. WITH THESE HOMES COMING IN, IT'S ONLY 4000 SQUARE FOOTAGE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? OH, I'M SORRY, DENA FREEMAN I DID LOOK THROUGH THE PCB AGENDA PACKET AND THE ALL THE APPLICATION MATERIALS WERE PROVIDED, INCLUDING CIVIL PLANS, DRAINAGE STATEMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, IRRIGATION PLANS, LANDSCAPE PLANS, TRAFFIC REPORTS, ETC. SO THERE WAS THE PACKET DID
[01:40:07]
INCLUDE ALL OF THAT INFORMATION. AND IN PARTICULAR, MADAM CHAIR, TO YOUR QUESTION ABOUT FIRE FLOW IN AMONGST WHICH WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT, AND AS YOU KNOW, IT'S VERY LONG WITH A LOT OF INFORMATION WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS. BACK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PACKAGE, WE'VE GOT COMMENTS ADDRESSING HERE. IT'S IN OUTSTANDING ITEMS NUMBER. WHERE DID IT GO. OH OTHER ITEMS NUMBER TWO BASICALLY FIRE FIRE MARSHAL FIRE FLOW TEST CONDUCTED. ON MAY 20TH, 2025. RESULTS PROVIDED. VILLAGE PERFORMED FIRE FLOW TESTS ON 1106 NOVEMBER 6TH, 2025 SHOWED FIRE FLOW RESULT OF 1010 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 36 PSI.COMPLETE. APPROVED. SO THEY'VE DONE MULTIPLE TESTS TO CONFIRM IT MEETS THE FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS IN THAT AREA. AS THE PCB KNOWS, WE DO HAVE FIRE FLOW ISSUES IN SOME AREAS OF THE VILLAGE THAT, AS MY UNDERSTANDING GOES, TENDS TO BE LOCATION SPECIFIC. BUT THEY DID DO MULTIPLE TESTS IN THIS LOCATION AND FOUND THE FIRE FLOW TO BE APPROPRIATE. NOW, IF I CAN VERIFY WHEN THEY WERE PERFORMING THOSE TESTINGS, WAS IT IN REGARDS TO THE. HOLD ON A SECOND. WAS IT FOR THE THE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE OR WAS IT THE TESTING? WAS IT SPECIFICALLY FOR TO SUPPORT THE 71 PERMANENT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT'S BEING PROPOSED? DENA FREEMAN SO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES INCLUDES THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR REVIEW, AND IT WOULD BE BASED ON THE 71 UNITS PROPOSED, THE 71 LOTS AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SO HE IS ACTUALLY HE ATTENDS THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. HE RECEIVES THE SO THE MEETINGS HE RECEIVES THE INFORMATION AS THE APPLICATION. HE PROVIDES COMMENTS AND IT DOESN'T MOVE FORWARD UNTIL HE'S SATISFIED. AND THOSE TESTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED AND THE RESULTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY HIM. HE THEN SIGNS OFF IN A SEPARATE SYSTEM CALLED A CELLAR WITH MARTIN COUNTY, AND THAT'S INFORMATION THAT'S PROVIDED TO US TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE CONFIDENT MOVING FORWARD, THAT THEY CAN PROVIDE THAT FIRE FLOW. OKAY. THE REASON WHY I'M ASKING THIS QUESTION IS BECAUSE BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT I REVIEWED, I WASN'T ABLE TO REACH OUT IN ADVANCE TO, YOU KNOW, ASK MY QUESTIONS BECAUSE I WAS SICK FOR LIKE ALMOST TWO WEEKS. AND BUT BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT I DID REVIEW LIKE THAT WAS ONE OF MY CONCERNS. I FELT AS IF THE INFORMATION THAT WAS BEING PROVIDED WAS MORE SO IN REGARDS TO THE FEMA SETUP THAT WAS THERE PRIOR TO THIS PROJECT, AND I DIDN'T. FROM WHAT I COULD SEE, I DIDN'T SEE THAT IT WAS SPECIFIC TO THE 71 DWELLINGS THAT'S BEING PROPOSED ON THAT LOT. I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. AND I'M REALLY GLAD TO SEE YOU HERE TODAY, BECAUSE I KNEW SHE'D BEEN VERY SICK FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS AS A LOT OF PEOPLE. BUT FROM A INFORMATIONAL POINT OF VIEW, WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S CLEARER. WE DO HAVE INFORMATION FROM THIS DATABASE SYSTEM THAT IS A REVIEW SYSTEM IN MARTIN COUNTY. WE COULD PROVIDE SCREENSHOTS OF THAT INFORMATION IN ADDITION TO WHAT WAS PROVIDED. KNOWING THE PROCESS AND WORKING WITH THE PROCESS EVERY DAY IS IT'S HARD TO GET TO ALLOW YOU TO GET INTO MY HEAD AND KNOW WHAT IS DONE, AND THAT WE CHECK THE BOXES AHEAD OF BEING HERE SO I CAN MAKE THAT CLEARER IN FUTURE. BUT REST ASSURED THAT DOUG CULLEN AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DID UNDERTAKE THE REVIEWS BASED ON THOSE 71 UNITS, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE ASKED THEM TO DO. THEY HERE NOT TO LOOK AT WHAT WAS ALREADY THERE, BUT ALSO IN RELATION TO WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED, BECAUSE IF THEY CAN'T MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE FLOW OR THE ACTUAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE, THE FIRE, YOU KNOW, STATE STATUTES, THEN THIS PROJECT WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO GO AHEAD. AND I CAN OFFER YOU THIS STAFF HAS NOT BEEN SHY IN TELLING APPLICANTS, NO, YOU DON'T MEET FIRE FLOW HERE BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEM LATER. SO. THAT'S THAT'S THE REVIEW WE HAVE BACK WITH REGARD TO THIS PROPERTY ON THIS PROJECT. ANY ANY OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, CONCERNS? I JUST NEED CLARIFICATION ON THE BECAUSE THE THE THIS IS TOO SMALL. I CANNOT READ THIS. SO I JUST WANTED CLARIFICATION ON HOW WILL THE TRAFFIC FLOW THROUGH THIS. IS IT GOING TO BE COMPLETELY CLOSED OFF FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE STREETS? ARE PEOPLE GOING TO BE BACKING IN AND OUT OF THEIR DRIVEWAYS OFF MLK? HOW'S THAT WORKING? YOU CAN HAVE THE APPLICANT AGENT.
SORRY. YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. CAN YOU PUT BACK ON THE THE SITE PLAN BECAUSE IT'LL
[01:45:04]
BE EASIER, I THINK, TO TURN AROUND. YEAH. AND THEN FROM THE POWERPOINT. SO THE GOOD NEWS IS, IS THAT THE STREETS IT'S NOT A GATED COMMUNITY. SO RIGHT NOW MARTIN LUTHER KING GOES STRAIGHT THROUGH THROUGH THE PROJECT CONNECTING. THANK YOU CHARLESTON. WELL GETTING OLDER THE EYES ARE HAVING PROBLEMS CHARLESTON TO FARM TO FARM ROAD. BUT WE'RE ALSO GOING TO EXTEND RIGHT NOW SOUTHWEST WILLIAMS DOES NOT CONNECT THOSE TWO. SO WE'RE GOING TO ADD THAT IN. SO THAT IS GOING TO CONNECT THOSE ROADS TO. AND THEN THERE'S GOING TO BE THE CONNECTION OVER TO SOUTHWEST 1/73. SO IT'S GOING TO ALLOW FOR A LOT MORE TRAFFIC FLOW THROUGH THE SITE.AND THEN CONNECTING CONNECTION OF THE DIFFERENT ROADS. SO THE BUILDING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE GOING TO BE ON THERE LIKE A NORMAL SUBDIVISION WITH THE GARAGES AND THE DRIVEWAYS COMING OUT ON THOSE ROADS. AND AGAIN, IT'S NOT GATED, SO IT'S ALL FREE FLOW. SO THEY WILL BE ENTERING AND EXITING THEIR DRIVEWAYS ON MLK. YEAH OKAY. YEAH. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME.
MADAM CHAIR. I DO HAVE A PUBLIC. MAKE SURE MISS LINDA. MICHAEL. FOR THE RECORD, LINDA, JUST A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. SINCE THESE LOTS ARE SO SMALL, IT LOOKED LIKE ON THE DRAWINGS THAT THERE PROBABLY BE ONLY ROOM FOR ONE CAR ON THE DRIVEWAY. OR WILL THERE BE ACCOMMODATIONS MADE FOR ON STREET PARKING? THE STREETS OUT THERE ARE NARROW, AND THERE ARE VERY FEW HOUSEHOLDS IN INDIAN TOWN RIGHT NOW THAT ONLY HAVE ONE VEHICLE PER HOUSE. SO YOU'RE GOING TO END UP WITH A LOT OF PEOPLE PARKING ON STREETS AND CHILDREN RUNNING BETWEEN THEM, CREATING PROBLEMS. I'M I DON'T KNOW IF THERE WILL BE AN HOA IN PLACE TO TRY AND REGULATE THAT. AND I HAS THERE BEEN ANY STUDY DONE TO SEE IF THE ADDITION OF 71 HOUSEHOLDS OF KIDS CAN BE ACCOMMODATED BY OUR SCHOOLS? THANK YOU. SO, DINA FREEMAN, I CAN ANSWER, BUT YOU ALSO HAVE. SO IN TERMS OF SCHOOLS, THE SCHOOL CAPACITY ANALYSIS WAS SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE. THEY ALSO HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL THAT ATTENDS OR SOMETIMES MULTIPLES THAT DO ATTEND. WE DO TRANSMIT AND HAVE THEM REVIEW AND ATTEND THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES. SO THAT'S BEEN SATISFIED. FROM A PARKING POINT OF VIEW, THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT IS TWO SPACES PER UNIT, AND THAT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE ON THE ON THE THE SITE PLAN. THAT INFORMATION IS AND THAT WILL BE RECORDED. AND THEN THERE ARE SOME PROVISIONS FOR ON STREET AND ALSO FOR THE KIOSK WITH THE KIOSK SIDE OF IT. THE ENGINEER REVIEWED AND AND MADE SURE THAT IT WAS PRACTICAL AND AND SAFE AND FIRE ALSO REVIEWED FROM AN AUTO TURN ANALYSIS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY COULD GET AROUND THERE. I DO RECOGNIZE AND WE DO KNOW WITH CODE COMPLIANCE THERE'S A LOT OF ISSUES WITH PARKING WITHIN INDIAN TOWN. THE THERE'S A RAISE, THERE'S AN INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF CARS AS THE CHILDREN GET OLDER AND THEY STAY AT HOME THESE DAYS. SO WE DO RECOGNIZE THAT. BUT THE CODE PROVISION IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRES TWO PARKING SPACES PER UNIT. AND THEY HAVE DEMONSTRATED AND PROVIDED FOR THAT. SO I THINK THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTIONS. IT WAS REGARDING PARKING HOA. SO JUST SEPARATE TO THIS, THERE IS A PLAT THAT'S UNDER REVIEW BY STAFF. SEPARATE TO THE PLAT WILL INCLUDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE METES AND BOUNDS AHEAD OF THEM. LOOKING TO SELL INDIVIDUAL LOTS.
AND THEN OBVIOUSLY PART OF THAT WOULD AS A PLAT AND STATE STATUTES REQUIRES THE HOA DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED AND FOR THEM TO MANAGE THE SUBDIVISION. SO AND IF THAT IS FAILS AND THERE ARE ISSUES, THEN, YOU KNOW, HOA, THE COMPANY REGULATING THE OVERALL SUBDIVISION WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MANAGE THAT. AND CODE COMPLIANCE WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, HOT ON THEIR HEELS TO BE REQUIRING THEM TO MANAGE THEIR PARKING AND ADDRESS ANY ISSUES, ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE LOOKING AT BLOCKING ANY AND ANY SIDEWALKS AND CREATING AND CREATING ANY SAFETY ISSUES. AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'RE TRYING TO ADDRESS THROUGHOUT
[01:50:04]
THE VILLAGE AS A COMMUNITY THAT EVOLVED PRIOR TO A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVING CARS AND NOW HAVING SOMETIMES FOUR AND FIVE CARS. BUT THE CODE PROVISION IS WHAT STAFF IS MANDATED AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO DESIGN TO MEET. AND YES, IT IS THE MINIMUM STANDARDS, BUT WE CANNOT ASK THEM TO PROVIDE MORE THAN THAT. IF THEY WANT TO OFFER THAT, THAT'S FINE. BUT AS STAFF, WE WE THE MINIMUM IS TWO SPACES PER UNIT. SO I HOPE THAT ADDRESSES THAT. DO YOU WANT.YEAH I CAN ADD. SO THE DRIVEWAYS WILL ACCOMMODATE TWO CARS. AND THEN THE UNITS HAVE A ONE CAR GARAGE. SO THEY'RE LOOKING AT THREE THREE PARKING SPACES PER UNIT. AND JUST TO REBUT TO THAT THAT THE MINIMUM HAS BEEN MET ON THE SITE PLAN, WHICH IS TWO. SO OBVIOUSLY IF YOU'RE PROVIDING AN ADDITIONAL SPACE WITHIN THE GARAGE, THAT'S THAT'S AN ABSOLUTE BONUS. THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE? BEFORE I ENTERTAIN A MOTION, I'LL JUST I HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY. SO I'M NOT IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION FOR THE MAJOR SITE PLAN. APPROVAL OF THE HERITAGE PARK DEVELOPMENT BASED ON BASED UPON EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD FROM MY FINDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 DASH 8.65 OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS IN THE VILLAGE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. FIRST FAILURE TO MEET FAILURE TO MEET APPROVAL CRITERIA. SECTION 12 DASH 8.65 A CONSISTENCY AND PUBLIC BENEFIT. SECTION 12 DASH 8.658 REQUIRES THAT A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONFORM TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BE CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS OR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS, AND SERVE A PUBLIC BENEFIT WARRANTING APPROVAL AT THE TIME IT IS CONSIDERED, WHILE WHILE STAFF ASSERTS NUMERICAL DENSITY COMPLIANCE UNDER FUTURE LAND USE POLICY. 6.1.8 URBAN RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, I FOUND THAT THE RECORD LACKS COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, DEMONSTRATING THAT THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES RELATED TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY, ORDERLY GROWTH AND INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DENSITY ALONE DOES NOT ESTABLISH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY, DEVELOPMENT, DENSITY, AND INTENSITY UNDER POLICY 6.1.8 ARE TO ROAD, ROADWAY CAPACITY, PUBLIC SERVICES, AND ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITATIONS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY DEMONSTRATED FOR THE PROPOSED INTENSITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. SECONDLY, INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF FAVORABLE IMPACT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES. SECTION 12 DASH 8.65 REQUIRES THAT DEVELOPMENT NOT ONLY UNDULY BURDEN WATER, SEWER SOLID WASTE. RECREATION, EDUCATION, OR OTHER NECESSARY PUBLIC FACILITIES THAT ARE CONSTRUCTED OR PLANNED OR BUDGETED. DIRECTED RELIES HEAVILY ON THE SITE'S FORMER FEMA USE TO ESTABLISH ADEQUACY OF WATER, SEWER, AND FIRE FLOW CAPACITY. HOWEVER, NO CURRENT PROJECT SPECIFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS IS PROVIDED, DEMONSTRATING THAT EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ORIGINALLY DESIGNED FOR TEMPORARY EMERGENCY HOUSING CAN SUBSTANTIALLY SUPPORT 71 PERMANENT SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS OVER TIME.
ABSENT SUCH EVIDENCE, I CANNOT FIND COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 12 DASH 8.65 D. NEXT, INADEQUATE DEMONSTRATION OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS. SECTION 12 DASH 8.65 E. SECTION 12 DASH 8.65 E REQUIRES THE THAT DEVELOPMENT NOT UNDULY BURDEN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, INCLUDING ROADS AND STREETS. WHILE A TRAFFIC REVIEW WAS CONDUCTED, THE FINDINGS DO NOT MEANINGFULLY ADDRESS PEAK HOUR IMPACTS, CUMULATIVE IMPACTS FROM NEIGHBORHOOD FROM NEARBY OR PENDING DEVELOPMENT, EMERGENCY ACCESS, AND EVACUATION CONSIDERATIONS TIED TO INCREASED RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY. CONCLUSORY STATEMENTS THAT THERE ARE NO ISSUES DO NOT CONSTITUTE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO SATISFY SECTION 12 DASH 8.65 E. FINALLY, CUMULATIVE IMPACTS NOT ADEQUATELY EVALUATED. THE MAJOR SITE PLAN REVIEW DOES NOT SUFFICIENTLY ANALYZE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS UNDER 12 DASH 8.65 A, D E INCREMENTAL APPROVAL OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY WITHOUT A HOLISTIC ASSESSMENT OF VILLAGE WIDE INFRASTRUCTURE, TRAFFIC AND PUBLIC SAFETY CAPACITY INCONSISTENT WITH SOUND PLANNING PRINCIPLES EMBEDDED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.
BASED ON TOTALITY OF THE RECORD, I FIND THAT APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NUMBER SP 2501 SIX
[01:55:06]
WOULD NOT SERVE THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE AS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 12 DASH EIGHT OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. FOR THIS REASON, AND BASED ON THE EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD AND APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE. I ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I SECOND THE MOTION.I'M SORRY I MOVED SECOND. I'M SORRY. YEAH, THERE'S NO MOTION ON THE FLOOR YET, SO SHE'S ASKED FOR A MOTION. OKAY. OR I'M SORRY. BEFORE I ENTERTAIN A MOTION, I'D LIKE TO GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS ANYTHING THAT I'VE SAID. AND, MR. WADE, IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT I GOT WRONG OR. OR ANYTHING, I'M NOT LIKE, YOU CAN CORRECT ME. LET ME. LET ME ADDRESS THAT FIRST, AND THEN I'LL TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT. IF THE APPLICANT HAS HAS ANYTHING ULTIMATELY, WITH REGARD TO FINDINGS THAT YOU'VE MADE BASED ON ALL OF THIS, IT IT WOULD NOT BE MY PLACE TO TO DISAGREE WITH YOU. IT'S ULTIMATELY IT'S YOUR DECISION TO TO MAKE ALL THESE MATTERS. I WOULD NOTE JUST ONE THING FACTUALLY JUST TO TO HELP OUT AND ALL OF THAT. AND PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S GOING TO BE ON SITE WITH REGARD TO WATER AND WASTEWATER IS NOT GOING TO BE REUSING THE TEMPORARY FEMA INFRASTRUCTURE ON SITE. THEY'RE GOING TO BE CLEARING ALL THAT OUT AND BUILDING ALL NEW INFRASTRUCTURE. THAT'S JUST A MINOR POINT TO ALL OF IT. IT'S NOT MY PLACE TO TO SYSTEMATICALLY DISAGREE WITH, WITH, YOU KNOW, ANYTHING OR EVERYTHING YOU'VE LAID DOWN THERE. I DO THINK IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO PROVIDE THE APPLICANT AN OPPORTUNITY IF THEY DESIRE, BECAUSE OF THE DETAILED AMOUNT OF RECITATION YOU PROVIDED THERE, IF THEY HAVE ANY, AND THEN ENTERTAIN A MOTION. YES. YEAH. I'M GOING TO BRING I'M GOING TO BRING GABE, OUR CIVIL ENGINEER, UP AS WELL. BUT I MEAN WE NO, SORRY. WE PRESENTED MATERIALS TO THE STAFF PREPARED BY PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERS, TRAFFIC ENGINEERS. IT WAS REVIEWED BY THE VILLAGE STAFF AS WELL AS THEIR CONSULTANTS, SAYING THAT IT MET ALL OF THE CRITERIA FOR TRAFFIC, UTILITIES, SCHOOLS, ETC. SO THEN I'LL. YES. AND JUST TO ADD GABE BURDEN, CIVIL DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER RECORD, WHEN WE SUBMITTED, EVERYTHING THAT WAS EVALUATED WAS FOR 71 UNITS. WHEN WE CAME IN THE BIG THE BIG HUBBUB WAS, IS THERE ENOUGH ERCS IN YOUR UTILITIES TO HOST THIS SITE? AND WHAT IS ERCS? I DON'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT. IT'S HOW MANY UNITS YOU'RE ALLOWED TO HAVE ON THE SITE, BASICALLY. SO AND HONESTLY, THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF UNITS THAT WE HAD HEARD FROM YOUR UTILITY DIRECTOR WAS 74. THAT WAS THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT THAT WAS ACCOUNTED FOR FOR THIS SITE. OKAY. SO WE CAME IN UNDER THAT NUMBER. THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT IT IS. AND THEN FOR THE FIRE FLOW TEST, THE FIRE FLOW WAS CONDUCTED. IT PASSED MULTIPLE TIMES, AS MISS FREEMAN SAID, AND IT WAS FOR 71 UNITS. SO THAT'S THE ONLY THING I WOULD SAY TO REBUT YOUR THOUGHTS, YOU KNOW, BUT APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. AND ACTUALLY, MADAM CHAIR, I DO JUST WANT TO OFFER ONE ADDITIONAL THING. YES, SIR. AS I SAID, IT'S NOT MY PLACE TO, YOU KNOW, GO POINT BY POINT AND ADDRESS ANY FACTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THIS THAT'S YOU'RE COMPLETELY ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION, YOUR CONCLUSIONS. I WILL OFFER TO THE PCAB JUST AS A GENERAL LEGAL MATTER. ALL RIGHT. THAT YOU DO HAVE BEFORE YOU A A VERY LARGE, VOLUMINOUS AND COMPREHENSIVE RECORD OF STAFF'S REVIEW OF ALL OF THE MATTERS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE EVALUATED UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. AND BASED ON ALL OF THAT REVIEW, YOU HAVE RECEIVED A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. I WILL OFFER TO YOU, AS A LEGAL MATTER THAT THAT WOULD CONSTITUTE COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY TO APPROVE IT. AGAIN, I'M NOT TELLING YOU THAT FACTUALLY I'M DISAGREEING WITH YOU OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. AND I KNOW IT SEEMS LIKE A FINE DISTINCTION, BUT LEGALLY THE PCAB IS ENTITLED TO RELY ON THE REVIEW AND RECORD AND RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF OF APPROVAL CONCERNING THIS MATTER. IF THE PCAB DECIDES TO APPROVE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I ACTUALLY I WOULD. CAN WE HAVE A LITTLE
[02:00:01]
MORE DISCUSSION OR SHOULD WE DO A MOTION AND THEN A SECOND AND DISCUSSION? WHAT SHOULD WE DO? WE CAN I'LL ENTERTAIN DISCUSSION. WELL. WE ALL REVIEW THESE THINGS AND WE ALL HAVE OPINIONS. SOMETIMES THOSE OPINIONS ARE BASED ON FACT AND SOMETIMES THEY'RE BASED ON OUR WISHES AND AND DIFFERENT THINGS. THE SITE PLAN ANALYSIS IS EXHAUSTIVE AND REPETITIVE IN MANY CASES. AND IT WOULD APPEAR TO ME THAT THE THE THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF OUR CODE. IN IN MY OPINION, LIKE I SAID, WE ALL HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS, BUT IT IS OUR JOB TO DISCERN WHETHER OR NOT THEY'VE MET, THOSE MET, THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE.THE STAFF HAS DONE AN EXHAUSTIVE REVIEW AND COME FORTH WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL, BASED ON THE FACT THAT THEY THINK IT IS APPROVED. AND CHRIS, I THINK YOU DID A GREAT JOB ILLUSTRATING WHAT YOU THINK THEY HAVE NOT ACCOMPLISHED, AND I RESPECT THAT. BUT WITH THAT SAID, I BELIEVE THAT THE THE APPLICANT HAS MET THE STANDARD. SO WITH THAT SAID, IF WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION, I'LL MAKE A MOTION FOR RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. A SECOND MOTION ROLL CALL. YOUR MILEAGE. NO. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMAS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. NO. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. MOTION PASSES FOR. THANK YOU. THANK
[81.) Development Report ]
YOU. SIR. NEXT IS OUR DIRECTOR'S REPORT. YES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, DINA FREEMAN.I'M GOING TO STAND UP AT THE PODIUM AGAIN JUST BECAUSE IT HELPS WITH FOCUSING ON THE PRESENTATION DETAILS. I'LL BE THERE. SO BEFORE WE START THE PRESENTATION, AND I'M GOING TO ALLOW YOU TIME TO GET THE PRESENTATIONS, DINA FREEMAN WITH THE CID DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY WITHIN INDIAN TOWN, A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY HAS OCCURRED UNDER THE THRESHOLDS OF THE WHAT WOULD COME BEFORE YOU AS PLANNING ZONING APPEALS BOARD. WHAT I'D LIKE TO OFFER, HAVING HEARD A FEW COMMENTS, IS AN APOLOGY THAT WE'VE NOT BEEN HERE BEFORE TONIGHT TO PROVIDE THAT UPDATE. WHAT STAFF HAS DONE IS OBVIOUSLY LOOKED AT. WE HAVE NO DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS THAT WERE READY TO BE PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING ZONING APPEALS BOARD, AND THE ONLY REASON TO MEET WOULD HAVE BEEN BECAUSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY OR DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT. WHAT WE DON'T WANT TO DO IS LOSE SIGHT OF THE FACT THAT SOMETIMES YOU'RE GETTING ASKED QUESTIONS OUT THERE IN THE COMMUNITY, AND YOU'RE NOT IN A POSITION TO ANSWER THEM, BECAUSE WE'VE NOT HAD THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT. SO FOR CONSIDERATION IS THE IDEA OF ASKING IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MEET MORE REGULARLY JUST FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT, IF THERE ARE NOT OTHER AGENDA ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE PRESENTED TO YOU. YOU'RE A VOLUNTARY BOARD AND WE'RE RESPECTFUL OF YOUR TIME, BUT WE ALSO WANT TO GET THAT BALANCED. SO I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT AS AN INTRODUCTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT AND OFFER, YOU KNOW, RECEIVE COMMENTS INDIVIDUALLY TONIGHT OR LATER. YOU CAN FOLLOW UP WITH STAFF, YOU CAN FOLLOW UP WITH TARYN AND YOU KNOW, ANYBODY AT THE VILLAGE. AND LET US KNOW WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE US TO DO. SO WE DO PRESENT THIS AT THE JOINT WORKSHOP MEETINGS WITH MARTIN COUNTY, THE SCHOOL BOARD, CITY OF STUART AND THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. WE DO THAT QUARTERLY. IT IS TELEVISED. BUT ULTIMATELY, I THINK AT THE VERY LEAST, IT MAY BE A GOOD IDEA TO MEET MORE REGULARLY OR TO DIRECT AND MAKE IT VERY CLEAR WHERE IT'S AVAILABLE ONLINE. BUT I'M JUST GOING TO GIVE YOU A BRIEF PRESENTATION. SO LET'S JUST GO THROUGH WHAT WE DO AND ORDINARILY PRESENT IN MARTIN COUNTY TO LET THEM KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING. AND, AND EVERYBODY WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DO AND THANK YOU. NEXT SLIDE, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DO IS WE WANTED TO INTRODUCE AND LET EVERYBODY KNOW ON RECORD THERE ARE THERE HAVE BEEN SOME DEVELOPMENTS IN OUR GIS, OUR MAPPING SYSTEM FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN THAT ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE THROUGH THE LINKS THAT ARE THERE. WHAT THEY DO IS THEY DO SHOW THE EXISTING AND THE IN REVIEW, SORRY APPROVED AND IN REVIEW PROJECTS WITHIN THE VILLAGE. THIS IS UPDATED REGULARLY MONTHLY. LUCIA MENDOZA IS HERE AS OUR OFFICE COORDINATOR AND SHE WORKS VERY CLOSELY WITH OUR GIS CONSULTANT EXPERT, WHO USED TO BE A GIS GIS EXPERT WITHIN THE CITY OF STUART. AND SHE DOES PROVIDE A LOT OF EXPERTISE AND HAS PROVIDED A LOT OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN OUR GIS
[02:05:01]
SYSTEM. SHE'S IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING WITH LUCIE AND OUR DEPARTMENT TO MAKE EVEN BETTER IMPROVEMENTS. SO WHAT I WANTED TO DO IS PUT IT OUT THERE THAT THERE IS INFORMATION THAT'S AVAILABLE OUTSIDE OF THE MEETINGS THAT WE'RE HAVING, LIKE THE ONE TONIGHT. AND I WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THIS IS OUR EXISTING GIS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS A PROPOSED GIS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THAT'S UNDERWAY. AND LUCIA MENDOZA IS WORKING WITH MICHELLE JETT, OUR GIS SPECIALIST, TO ACTUALLY MAKE IT EVEN BETTER AND MORE INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED. SO THIS IS IN PROGRESS, AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE A MEETING COMING UP IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS TO TO HELP LOOK TO LAUNCH AND IMPLEMENT. BUT I WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW IT MAY LOOK A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS AS WE ROLL OUT A MORE IMPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS LIST. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND WHAT WE ALSO HAVE IS THE EXISTING VILLAGE AND COUNTY ZONING MAP. SO THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT. BEFORE YOU COULD ONLY SEE THE VILLAGE MAP AND THE ZONING AND THE LAND USE.NOW WHAT MICHELLE'S BEEN ABLE TO DO IS WORK WITH THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER INFORMATION, THE MARTIN COUNTY LAYERS. AND NOW YOU CAN ACTUALLY LOOK AT AND ZOOM IN AND OUT AND IDENTIFY WHAT'S HAPPENING AROUND THE VILLAGE AND NOT JUST WITHIN THE BOUNDARY, WHICH IS REALLY HELPFUL WHEN YOU'RE DOING ANALYSIS. JUST LIKE THE ANNEXATION AND THE LARGE SCALE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS THE ZONING MAP. AND AGAIN, WHAT WE'VE DONE AND WORKING WITH MICHELLE AND LUCIA IS WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO INCORPORATE THE PROPOSED GIS MAP. AND THAT'S ACTUALLY WE HAVE THAT LIVE ON THE WEBSITE RIGHT NOW. AND IT'S A LAYER THAT YOU CAN CLICK ON AND PUT IN MARTIN COUNTY. WHAT'S YOUR LAND USE AND ZONING IN THE SURROUNDING AREA? NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS A PROPOSED IMAGERY IN MARTIN COUNTY. THEY HAVE A LITTLE TIME A LITTLE CLOCK THAT YOU CAN CLICK SLIDE UP AND DOWN. IT'S REALLY HELPFUL WITH CODE COMPLIANCE BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE WHEN DEVELOPMENT OCCURRED THAT SHOULDN'T HAVE OCCURRED OR ACTIVITIES. BUT IT'S ALSO REALLY HELPFUL TO LOOK AT IN CONTEXT. HOW IS INDIAN TOWN EVOLVED? HOW HAS IT BECOME, YOU KNOW, AS IT'S DEVELOPING. AND THIS SHOWS YOU THE PROJECT, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY WHERE IT WAS VACANT AND NOW, SORRY, THE RIVER OAK PROJECT, NOT TERRA LAGO, THE RIVER OAK PROJECT WITH 131 UNITS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED. AND WHAT'S HELPFUL THERE IS TO SHOW THE DEVELOPMENT AS IT'S OCCURRING, BUT ALSO TO LOOK BACK AT WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE. SO THIS IS A REALLY IMPORTANT TOOL THAT WE'RE INTRODUCING. IT'S NOT ON OUR WEBSITE WITH THE VILLAGE YET. IT IS AVAILABLE THROUGH MARTIN COUNTY WITH THE LITTLE CLOCK AND THE TIMELINES. BUT WE ARE WORKING TO GET THIS UP AND RUNNING IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS IN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN.
NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS A LIST THAT WE ORDINARILY PRESENT TO YOU GUYS. AND AS THE PCB, WE'LL ALSO DO THAT TO VILLAGE COUNCIL AND THEN AT JOINT WORKSHOPS. IT SHOWS THE NONRESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. AND THE IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF THIS IS SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ALL OF THIS UNDER THE THRESHOLDS THAT WOULD ORDINARILY BE A MAJOR SITE PLAN. SO IF THEY'RE REVIEWED AS A MINOR SITE PLAN AND WE'VE GOT A LIST OF SOME OF THESE PROJECTS, WE'VE GOT THE DOLLAR TREE THAT'S RECEIVED A THE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. AND THEY'RE HOPEFULLY OPENING AT ANY POINT. BUT THEY WERE A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL USE. AND SO THAT ALTHOUGH THEY DID COME IN AND GET SOME VARIANCES THAT TRIGGERED PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARINGS, THE ACTUAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL WOULD BE A MINOR SITE PLAN. THE STORY PROJECT, WITH THE ADDITION OF 11,650FT■S OF ADDITIONAL STORAGE FACILITY AT STORE AWAY, WAS APPROVED AS A MINOR. WE BELIEVE THAT THEY'VE GOT SOME RIBBON CUTTING COMING UP. I THINK IN THE NEXT WEEK OR SO. THE PERFORMANCE POWERBOATS IS A LOT. EIGHT IN THE VENTURE PARK, WHICH IS THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION. THEY THE 13,442FT■S OF MARINE MANUFACTURING.
THEY'RE IN THE PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW. IF YOU HAVE A DRIVE AROUND VENTURE PARK, ALMOST ALL OF THE LOTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED OR HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WITHIN THAT SUBDIVISION TO ESTATES. IS THAT MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE FACILITY OFF OF FARM ROAD.
YOU'RE SEEING THAT AND WE'VE HAD QUESTIONS ON THAT FROM INDIVIDUALS ON THE BOARD. BUT ULTIMATELY THAT'S A 22,600 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE FACILITY, TWO BUILDINGS.
THEY'RE LOOKING TO SELL THOSE. THEY'VE BUILT THEM IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE, ACCOMMODATE NEW BUSINESSES OR EXISTING BUSINESSES MOVING INTO THOSE FACILITIES. AND THEY'RE UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW. GRIND HARD THE YOU'RE AWARE OF THIS PROJECT FROM PREVIOUS SITE PLAN APPROVALS THAT CAME IN AS A MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, AND THAT WAS THE 26,116FT■S. WE ARE HEARING THAT THERE WILL BE A PHASE TWO AND THAT WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS A MAJOR SITE PLAN AND WILL BE COMING BEFORE THE PCB ONCE IT'S GONE THROUGH ALL OF THE REVIEWS AND IT QUALIFIES TO COME BEFORE YOU NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. WE'VE ALSO THIS IS A LONG LIST. WE'VE GOT VENTURE PARK RCC CONSTRUCTION. THAT'S A MANUFACTURING BUILDING THAT'S 22,500FT■S. AND JUST TO BEAR IN MIND, IF IT'S UNDER 100,000FT■S IS AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, THEN IT DOESN'T COME BEFORE THE PCB AND THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. IT'S CLASSIFIED AS A MINOR. WE ALSO HAVE THE THE CEDRON INDIAN
[02:10:06]
TOWN UPCYCLING FACILITY. CEDRON IS UNDER SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR BEING LOCATED IN THE FORMER JUICE PLANT FACILITY. THAT'S JUST COME IN FOR I THINK THIS IS IT'S SECOND OR THIRD ROUND OF REVIEWS. SO IT'S GOING THROUGH THE REVIEWS WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES AHEAD OF ANY FINAL RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. YELLOW PINE TRUST COMPANY IS ALSO AT THE FORMER JUICE PLANT. THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF ACTIVITY, AND THIS IS A 86,165FT■S MANUFACTURING OF ROOF TRUSSES, AND THEY'VE COME IN INTO THE VILLAGE AND ARE UNDERWAY WITH THEIR CONSTRUCTION ON THE JUICE PLANT. THEY'VE CARVED OUT AND DID A LOT SPLIT, AND THEY'VE GOT A SITE PLAN THAT'S BEEN APPROVED FOR THAT PROPERTY. OH, APOLOGIES. THOUGH IT DOES SAY PUMP TESTING FACILITY. SO I THINK I GOT THAT A LITTLE BIT MIXED AROUND. YEAH. SORRY ABOUT THAT. I'M JUST SEEING IT NOW. THANK YOU FOR NOTICING. SO P3 TECHNOLOGIES IS THE PUMP TESTING FACILITY THAT'S IN THE ACTUAL VENTURE PARK LOT NINE I BELIEVE THEY'RE ABOUT AT THE ALMOST AT THE RIBBON CUTTING EVENT WHERE THEY'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO BE FINALIZED IN I THINK IT'S THIS MONTH. SO THEY'RE VERY ACTIVELY IN THE BUILDING PERMIT HAVING RECEIVED SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND BASICALLY VERY CLOSE TO COMPLETION ON THE PROJECT. WE HAVE INDIANTOWN GO KART FACILITY. THIS IS ONE THAT'S BEEN KIND OF IN LIMBO. WE HAVEN'T HAD A RESUBMISSION FOR A PRIVATE GO KART FACILITY. WE HAVE REACHED OUT TO THEM BECAUSE INDUSTRIAL LAND IS VALUABLE WITHIN INDIAN TOWN. WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT UTILIZED.AS OF YET THEY'VE NOT RESUBMITTED. SO WE'LL BE CHASING THEM AGAIN AND ASKING THEM, YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE YOUR INTENTIONS? THE LAST TIME WE SPOKE WITH THEM, THEY DID CONFIRM THAT THEY WERE STILL GOING AHEAD, BUT THEY DID REQUIRE SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AHEAD OF RESUBMITTAL. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO WE'VE GOT SKY LEASING AND US TRANSPORT ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION ARE TWO THAT ARE LOOKING TO STORE PART TRUCK PARKING ON THE LOTS 15 AND 16 IN VENTURE PARK. THIS IS A PERMITTED USE. THEY ARE GOING TO BE VERY STRICTLY CONDITIONED IN ANY. WHEN THEY GET TO A POINT OF QUALIFYING FOR ANY APPROVAL, TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS DOES NOT BECOME SOME JUNKYARD OR A STORAGE OF INOPERABLE UNLICENSED TAGGED VEHICLES. SO WE'RE BEING VERY STRICT WITH LANDSCAPING BUFFERS AND HOW THEY ENTER, LEAVE AND PARK WITHIN THAT FACILITY. WITHIN THOSE TWO LOTS, WE ALSO HAVE THE SILVER FOX. THIS IS ON THERE. IT'S ACTUALLY BEEN A FEW MONTHS NOW. SO THE PRE-APPLICATION WAS HELD BACK IN MAY, BUT THEY'VE BEEN BACK AND FORTH MEETING WITH A PROPOSED 2,000,000 SQUARE FOOT DATA PROCESSING FACILITY. WE ARE PENDING THEM FORMALLY SUBMITTING A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. OBVIOUSLY, 2,000,000FT■S IS A DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL COME BEFORE THE PCB AND ALSO VILLAGE COUNCIL AS A MAJOR SITE PLAN. VENTURE PARK LOT 24 IS ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING VACANT LOTS WITHIN VENTURE PARK. THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE IS AGAIN A PERMITTED USE. THERE'S ZERO SQUARE FEET. IT WOULD BE THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS THAT WILL BE STORED ON THAT FACILITY. WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THAT AS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES, AND WE WILL BE REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, INCLUDING A LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT MEETS AT LEAST THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE VENTURE PARK, SO THEY'LL BE REQUIRED TO BUFFER AND SCREEN AND ACHIEVE A BETTER STANDARD OF DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT ON THAT LOT BEFORE THEY'LL GET TO A POINT OF APPROVAL. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THIS STILL INCLUDES TERRA. LAGO, OBVIOUSLY, IS THE OVERALL MASTER SITE PLAN, WITH A 2488 UNITS, SINGLE FAMILY, MULTIFAMILY AND TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT. THEY'VE RECEIVED THE APPROVAL WITH A MASTER SITE PLAN, AND THEY'RE IN THE PROCESS OF OBVIOUSLY IMPLEMENTING EACH OF THOSE PHASES. ONE A AND ONE B HAS BEEN SITE PLAN APPROVED, AND YOU'RE SEEING THAT CONSTRUCTION OCCURRING ON THERE. AND THEN WHEN THEY COME BACK IN FOR THE NEXT PHASE, THERE'LL BE ANOTHER SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL, REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT PHASES TO ADD UP AND BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PUD ZONING AGREEMENT AND THE MASTER SITE PLAN. SO OBVIOUSLY THAT THERE'LL BE MORE SUBMITTALS ALONG THE WAY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. YEAH. AND THEN THIS HAS GOT THE SUBSEQUENT PHASES. AND ALSO THEY HAD PLAT APPROVAL BACK FOR PHASE ONE A AND ONE B. AND THEN THE REMAINING PHASE FOR PHASE ONE B WAS ALSO THE LAST PLAT THAT WAS APPROVED, THAT THERE WAS ONE THAT WAS APPROVED, THAT WAS REQUIRED TO COME BEFORE PCB AND VILLAGE COUNCIL. THE STATE STATUTES HAVE CHANGED, AND PLATS ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED TO BE A PART OF A PUBLIC HEARING. SO YOU WILL NOT ACTUALLY SEE THE PLAT. BUT THE PLAT IS AFTER THE FINAL SITE PLAN, AND IT'S ALL THE METES AND BOUNDS AND THE LEGALITIES, RATHER THAN THE OVERALL INTENT AND THE OVERALL DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF THE PROPERTY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND WE'VE GOT THE RIVER OAK
[02:15:03]
MAJOR SITE PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED FOR 131 UNITS. ANYTHING OVER 50 UNITS COMES BEFORE THE PCB AND THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. THEY'RE AT THE BUILDING PERMIT. YOU'RE SEEING THEM ROLL OUT THAT DEVELOPMENT AS WELL, CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED.THEY COME IN FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS AND BUILDING PERMITS, AND THEY ARE REVIEWED AGAINST THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. SEMINOLE CROSSING WAS APPROVED AND IS BEING BUILT OUT FOR THE 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. AND THEN WE'VE GOT OSCEOLA PINES PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WAS RECENTLY APPROVED. AND THAT DID COME BEFORE THE PCB AND VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR 158 UNITS AT THIS POINT. AND TO MIRROR WHAT WADE WAS TALKING ABOUT EARLIER, RESIDENTIAL CAPACITY, THE CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR UTILITIES, WATER AND SEWER WAS UNDERTAKEN. AND AT THIS STAGE ONLY 40 OF THOSE UNITS ARE ALLOWED TO BE BUILT BASED ON THE EXISTING CAPACITY FOR WATER, IN PARTICULAR HERITAGE PARK. WE JUST OBVIOUSLY WE JUST SAW THAT. AND SO THAT'S SELF-EXPLANATORY WITH THE 71 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND WE'VE GOT THE PLAT THAT'S IN RIGHT NOW. THE PLAT CANNOT BE APPROVED BEFORE THE SITE PLAN CAN BE APPROVED, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE TO HAVE A SITE PLAN. AND THEN THE PLAT HAS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE MAJOR SITE PLAN. BUT IT'S UNDER REVIEW WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES. WE ALSO HAVE JPI INDIAN TOWN, WHICH IS AN APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR 40 RESIDENTIAL UNITS BASED ON THE CAPACITY ISSUES REGARDING WATER. THEY ARE COMING IN IN WITH INDIVIDUAL WELLS FOR THE PROJECTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF UNITS AND THE CHALLENGES WITH CAPACITY. WE'VE GOT PARKVIEW APARTMENTS, WHICH WAS APPROVED FOR MULTIFAMILY, WHICH IS THE, YOU KNOW, ADJACENT TO WHERE WE ARE IN THIS BUILDING TODAY. THEY HAVE APPROVAL FOR 40 UNITS. THEY HAVE HAD THAT APPROVED A WHILE AGO, BUT THEY'RE CONTINUING TO HOLD WITH A TIMETABLE EXTENSIONS TO KEEP THAT ON THE BOOKS. BUT THERE'S NO BUILDING PERMITS BEEN PROVIDED TO DATE. HENDRY RIDGE IS A THAT WAS A PRE-APPLICATION THAT WAS HELD LAST OCTOBER FOR AND I BELIEVE IT WAS A SECOND PRE-APPLICATION. THEY'RE LOOKING TO PROPOSE 443 UNITS, INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOME AND APARTMENTS. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'VE NOT SEEN A FORMAL SUBMITTAL. AND OBVIOUSLY THE NUMBERS WOULD COME BEFORE THE PCB AND THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, THE RIVER OAK PUD. THERE WAS A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING HELD FOR A PROPOSED SECOND PHASE OF RIVER OAK ON THE PROPERTY THAT IS OWNED AND ADJACENT TO FOR 800 UNITS, INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY MULTIFAMILY AND TOWNHOUSES. THE PREAPP WAS HELD AND WE'RE PENDING SUBMISSION ON THAT, BUT OBVIOUSLY WHEN WE MET WITH THEM, THERE WAS DISCUSSION AROUND CAPACITY AND WATER IN PARTICULAR. WE ALSO HAD A CITRUS GROVE, A PRE-APPLICATION FOR 309 SINGLE FAMILY AND TOWNHOMES. THERE'S ALSO SO THERE'S A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN TO GO FROM SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. SO TWO SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL THAT'S UNDER REVIEW WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES RIGHT NOW THAT WILL COME BEFORE YOU AS A PUBLIC HEARING, BECAUSE THAT'S A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE MAP TO WHERE IT WOULD BE TWO UNITS PER ACRE. THEY WERE PROPOSING A FIVE UNIT PER ACRE INCREASE IN DENSITY. SO THAT WILL BE SOMETHING THAT STAFF ARE STILL WORKING ON THE STAFF REPORT. BUT ONCE IT'S BEEN ISSUED WITH THE APPLICANT, WE'LL START TO LOOK AT SCHEDULING THOSE PUBLIC HEARINGS. BUT THERE WILL BE A STAFF REPORT ISSUED AND THEY ARE REQUIRED TO RESPOND BECAUSE THERE ARE ISSUES THAT THEY STILL NEED TO ADDRESS. SO THAT'S THE STATUS ON THAT ONE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. WE'VE GOT A COUPLE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS. SO WE'VE GOT THE BESKAR INVESTMENTS IS AN ANNEXATION FOR 1,289.71 ACRES.
THAT'S BEEN IN WITH STAFF FOR A LITTLE WHILE NOW. IT'S CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW AND WILL REQUIRE THE SAME TYPE OF PROCEDURE AS WHAT YOU'VE JUST SEEN WITH FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, BASED ON STATE STATUTES TO MOVE THE BOUNDARY FOR ANNEXATION, VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION, AND ALSO A LAND USE AMENDMENT TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT PARROT. YOU'VE SEEN THAT TODAY. SO THAT'S SELF-EXPLANATORY FOR THE 5,722.30 ACRES. AND WE'VE GOT A COUPLE OF MAPS THAT JUST SHOW THE ONE THAT YOU SAW EARLIER TODAY WITH THE PROJECT PARROT.
NEXT SLIDE. AND THERE'S THE ONE FOR THE BESKAR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ANNEXATION AND REZONING. SO THERE'LL BE THREE SEPARATE. AND WITH THEM, THEY'VE ALREADY PROVIDED A REZONING AS WELL. THEY'RE LOOKING TO DO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO THAT'S THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. I'VE PROVIDED YOU WITH A LOT OF INFORMATION. I DIDN'T PROVIDE YOU WITH LOCATION MAPS AND DEPICT EVERY BECAUSE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN LIKE A HUNDRED PAGE SLIDE. WE CAN DO THAT IN FUTURE AS WELL, WHERE WE SHOW YOU THE ZOOMED IN AERIALS AND THE LOCATIONS AND SUCH FORTH. BUT BECAUSE WE'VE NOT MET FOR SO LONG, I'VE KIND OF WANTED TO GET SOME FEEDBACK FROM YOU, EITHER INDIVIDUALLY
[02:20:03]
OR COLLECTIVELY. YOU KNOW, IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE AND HOW REGULARLY. BUT THAT'S A SUMMARY OF WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING IN INDIAN TOWN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. BEEN VERY BUSY OBVIOUSLY. ANY LAST WORDS? OKAY. I'LL MOVE THAT. ANY MEETING THAT GOES PAST 730 WE HAVE TACOS, GUACAMOLE AND SOUR CREAM. IF THERE'S NOTHING MORE. I LIKE TO THINK STAFF FOR THE WEALTH OF INFORMATION. AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, PATIENCE AND THANK EVERYONE HERE FOR BEING ABLE TO MAKE THE MEETING. TAKING TIME OUT OF YOUR BUSY SCHEDULES. WE APPRECIATE IT. IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE. MEETING ADJOURNED.