[1) CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:06]
CALL TO ORDER THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. CODE COMPLIANCE MAGISTRATE HEARING FOR DECEMBER 16TH, 2025. PLEASE RISE. JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND TO REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. OKAY. LET'S SEE. WE'VE GOT A FEW
[3.1) December 2025 Docket]
CONTINUANCE CASES, AND I THINK THAT'S ABOUT IT FOR THE DAY. RIGHT? YEAH. ALL RIGHT. SO FIRST CASE IS T 25 0010. THAT'S FOR THE PROPERTY AT 16 OH 15 SOUTHWEST FARM ROAD. AND THE OWNER IS INDIAN TOWN BL PROPERTY LLC AND OFFICER NARANJO. IF YOU'LL RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. SO HELP YOU GOD? YES. ALRIGHT. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY, YOU CAN TELL ME WHAT WE GOT HERE. SO CASE T 25 0010. 16015 SOUTHWEST FARM ROAD. DENA AND I MET WITH THE TENANT. HE IS ASKING FOR A 30 DAY CONTINUANCE. HE HAS SHOWED SOME IMPROVEMENT, BUT WE'RE TRYING TO GET HIM TO DO SOME SCREENING AROUND THE PROPERTY. OKAY. AND I'M ASSUMING YOU'RE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE REQUEST FOR THE 30 DAY CONTINUANCE? YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IS IT IS IT DOWN TO JUST THE STORAGE, THE THE SCREENING OF THE OF THE PROPERTY? IS THAT THE ISSUE? YEAH. I MEAN, HE WAS IT WAS KIND OF JUST REALLY A MESS PARKING ON THE RIGHT OF WAY AND RIGHT OUTSIDE. SO HE MOVED EVERYTHING INSIDE OF HIS PROPERTY. NOW HE'S JUST TRYING TO PROVIDE SCREENING SO IT DOESN'T LOOK SO BAD OKAY. AND IS IT IN A COMMERCIAL AREA.YEAH. IT'S A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OKAY. THAT'S. YEAH. OUT ON SOUTHWEST FARM OKAY. ALL RIGHT.
GOOD. ALL RIGHT. SO BASED UPON YOUR REPRESENTATIONS, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE TO GRANT A 30 DAY EXTENSION AND CONTINUE THIS HEARING UNTIL JANUARY 20TH. ACTUALLY A LITTLE MORE THAN 30 DAYS. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. OKAY. THE NEXT ONE IS ACTUALLY TWO CASES. SAME OWNER, DIFFERENT PROPERTIES. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. OKAY. SO IT'S CASE T 25 0012. AND T 25 0013 BOTH REQUESTING 30 DAY CONTINUANCE. AND GO AHEAD. LET'S START WITH 12 WITH 0012.
THAT CASE OKAY. IT'S ON 12. IT'S A VACANT PROPERTY THAT THEY'RE STORING A TRAILER. IT'S THE SAME PROPERTY OWNER. THEY CONTACTED ME AND ASKED FOR A 30 DAY CONTINUANCE AFTER THE HOLIDAYS. THEY LIVE DOWN SOUTH. FROM WHAT THEY'RE SAYING IS IT'S NOT THEIR STUFF. SO THEY'RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHO'S PARKING ON IT. AND THEN ON 13, THEY SAID THEY WILL MOLD THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS JUST OVERGROWN GRASS, AND THERE WAS ANOTHER TRAILER ON IT, BUT THAT TRAILER WAS REMOVED. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO CASE NUMBER T 25 0013, WHICH IS WHAT A COUPLE PROPERTIES DOWN. NO RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER. RIGHT. NEXT OKAY. SO IT'S THE NEXT PROPERTY OVER.
THAT'S THE ONE THAT NEEDS TO BE MOWED. YES. AND THEN THE T 25 0012 IS WHERE THERE'S A TRAILER AND THE OWNER DOES NOT KNOW WHO OWNS IT. NO. AND THEN. FOR 13 WHEN I REINSPECTED THERE WAS
[00:05:09]
ANOTHER TRAILER ON THERE, BUT THAT ONE WAS REMOVED. I THINK IT'S JUST LOCAL PEOPLE JUST OKAY PARKING THEIR TRAILERS THERE. ALL RIGHT. I WONDER IF. IF IT WOULD MAKE ANY AND I DON'T I DON'T KNOW THE AREA WELL ENOUGH TO KNOW THIS, BUT I'M JUST ASKING THE QUESTION OUT LOUD. DOES IT MAKE ANY SENSE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY TO PUT NO PARKING SIGNS FACING OUT SO PEOPLE ARE AWARE THAT THEY CAN'T PARK ON THE ON THE PROPERTY? YEAH, I COULD GET WITH THE OWNER TO SEE IF WE COULD PUT NO TRESPASSING SIGNS TO. I MEAN, THAT'S NO TRESPASSING IS THE PROPERTY OWNERS ISSUE. BUT IF YOU PUT THE NO PARKING ON THE RIGHT OF WAY, NOT NOT, BUT FACING OUT, SOMETIMES THAT HELPS. I'VE HAD A LITTLE BIT OF EXPERIENCE WITH THAT AND IT'S HELPED. AND IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE THERE FOREVER. OKAY. YOU COULD PULL THEM AFTER SIX MONTHS AND SEE IF SEE IF THE PROBLEM'S RESOLVED. JUST JUST A THOUGHT ANYWAY. OKAY. SO BASED UPON YOUR REPRESENTATION, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE TO CONTINUE T 25 0012 AND T 25 0013 OWNED BY JOSEPH AND FARIZA WILLIAMS. AND THAT'LL CONTINUE UNTIL JANUARY 20TH. CORRECT? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ONE'S. THIS ONE IS CASE NUMBER T 25 0005. THE OWNER IS BURIED MOSES ALSO SEEKING A 30 DAY CONTINUANCE. AND WHAT'S THE STORY WITH THAT ONE? YEAH. SO T 25 0005. SHE'S BEEN WORKING WITH LUCIA ON HER CERTIFICATE OF USE. IT WAS ISSUED ALL THE OUTDOOR STORAGE TRASH AND ABANDONED VEHICLES WERE REMOVED.THE LAST PART IS THEY'RE GOING TO BE DOING LIKE A LANDSCAPING TO BUFFER. HIS TRAILERS THAT HE DOES KEEP. ON THE LOT. OKAY. SO NEEDS LANDSCAPE. OKAY. SO BASED UPON THEIR EFFORT TO TO COMPLY, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE TO GRANT A 20 DAY CONTINUANCE IN THIS CASE AND MOVE IT TO THE JANUARY 20TH, 2026 HEARING. I WOULD JUST SAY, AND I'M SURE YOU'RE CERTAINLY MORE AWARE OF IT THAN I AM, BUT WHEN PEOPLE ARE MAKING A GOOD FAITH EFFORT AND AND REALLY SHOW PROGRESS, IT'S IT'S ALMOST A NO BRAINER TO GRANT THEM A LITTLE BIT OF EXTRA TIME. YES.
ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE. THE LAST ONE WE'VE GOT IS CASE NUMBER G 25 0007. MARY MULLEN IS THE OWNER PROPERTY OF 14 964 SOUTHWEST 1/70 AVENUE. WHAT'S THE STORY WITH THAT ONE? SO ON THIS ONE THEY CAME IN. THEY APPLIED FOR THE PERMIT. THEY'RE WORKING WITH RANDY ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. SO HOPEFULLY WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS THE PERMIT SHOULD BE OKAY. WHAT KIND OF A PERMIT? ROOF. PERMIT ROOF. AND I'M ASSUMING THIS IS AFTER THE FACT. AND THEY HAD THEY HAD DONE THE WORK ALREADY. IS THAT CORRECT? YES. OKAY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER
[00:10:10]
ISSUES WITH THAT. HAVE THEY MADE APPLICATION. YES. THEY SUBMITTED APPLICATION. AND THEN RANDY JUST NEEDS PRODUCT APPROVAL. ONCE THAT'S IN THEN THE INSPECTIONS TO START OKAY.SO THEY PAID FOR THE PERMIT. THEY STILL HAVEN'T PAID FOR IT BECAUSE IT STILL HASN'T BEEN APPROVED BY JOSH UNTIL WE GET THE PRODUCT APPROVAL OKAY. ALL RIGHT. YEAH I DIDN'T KNOW I DIDN'T KNOW THE VILLAGE'S PRACTICE. WHETHER THEY TAKE IT IN, GET PAID AND THEN. YEAH. NO, ONCE THEY TAKE IT IN, THEN ONCE IT'S APPROVED. OKAY. GOT IT. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. SO BASED UPON YOUR REPRESENTATION, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE TO EXTEND THIS ANOTHER 30 OR SO DAYS UNTIL JANUARY 20TH PENDING THEIR RECEIPT OF THEIR PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ROOFING MATERIAL. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE. AND THEN. 1234. WE'VE GOT FIVE CASES THAT COMPLIED, WHICH IS GREAT. PRIOR TO TODAY'S HEARING. AND LET ME JUST ASK HIM IF YOU KNOW WHETHER THEY WERE ALL IN COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO THE TIME YOU SET OR WAS IT FOLLOWING, OR DO WE NEED TO ISSUE DO NOT REPEAT ORDERS IN ANY OF THEM? THEY WERE ALL REALLY WORKING WITH US ON ON ALL THE PROPERTIES. I, I FEEL LIKE, OKAY, SO YOU'RE NOT SEEKING A DO NOT REPEAT ORDER. OKAY. GREAT. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT'S GOOD. FIVE COMPLIANCE IS GOOD.
ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE. ANYTHING ELSE TO COME BEFORE US TODAY. SHORT HEARING. DOUBTED.
[5) NEXT HEARING DATE]
WISH EVERYBODY HAPPY HOLIDAYS AND WE WILL SEE YOU ALL IN* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.