AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD? YES. ALL RIGHT. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. GOOD
[3.1) June 17, 2025, Special Magistrate Docket]
[00:00:07]
MORNING. THIS IS CASE 2507 NINE. MATEO. JUAN. MIGUEL. GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS JONATHAN NARANJO, AND I'VE BEEN SWORN IN. I AM A CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN.THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY UPON MY INSPECTION ON MAY 6TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE IS MATEO JUAN MIGUEL, WHO IS NOT PRESENT TODAY. BACK IN MARCH MARCH 3RD, 2025, I ISSUED A COURTESY LETTER AND HE WAS GIVEN UNTIL. APRIL 30TH TO COMPLY. HE NEVER COMPLIED. IN THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1509 FOUR SOUTHWEST SEMINOLE DRIVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY MATEO JUAN MIGUEL. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECORDS CONFIRMING OWNERSHIP IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT ONE. ON MAY 6TH, 2025. I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND OBSERVED A VIOLATION UNDER SECTION 32.2 LIMITED RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. SECTION 33.1 PERMITTED USES. SECTION 9132 ABANDONED SALVAGE AND JUNK PROPERTY PROHIBITED. GENERALLY. SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE AND SECTION 67 201 NUISANCE DECLARED I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY REPRESENT WHAT I OBSERVED. THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS. TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX, SEVEN, EIGHT, AND NINE. BASED ON MY INVESTIGATION. BEFORE YOU GO FURTHER, LET'S WALK THROUGH THOSE EXHIBITS. OKAY, SO THAT I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT I'M LOOKING AT. TWO LOOKS LIKE THE AREA. BUT IT WAS HIM. YEP. HELLO. OKAY, SHERIFF. HAS A MIND OF ITS OWN. DOES IT? SO? YES. EXHIBIT TWO IS AN AERIAL VIEW. OKAY. THAT'S FROM THE COUNTY AERIALS. CORRECT. PROPERTY APPRAISER.
YES. ALL RIGHT. AND THE ONE WITH THE RED DOT IS THE PROPERTY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. CORRECT.
OKAY. THREE, THREE. THAT'S LIKE THEIR DRIVEWAY AND CARPORT WHERE THEY JUST, YOU KNOW, HAVE LAWNMOWERS, WOOD AND. OTHER THINGS THERE LIKE. OR IS IT JUST A DIRT DRIVEWAY? YEAH. IT'S JUST A DIRT DRIVEWAY. ALL RIGHT. FOUR FOUR. THAT'S MORE LIKE IT. THE STREET VIEW. IT'S THEY HAVE THAT TRUCK. THERE'S OTHER TRUCKS THAT PARK THERE LATER ON AT NIGHT AND EARLY MORNINGS. EXHIBIT FIVE.
THAT'S MORE OF A CLOSE VIEW UNDER THE LIKE UNDER THE CARPORT ON THE SIDE. ALL RIGHT. WAIT A MINUTE. NOW, BEFORE THAT'S NOT IS THAT A DRIVABLE? IT'S NOT AN ABANDONED VEHICLE. IT'S JUST ANOTHER VEHICLE. ANOTHER COMMERCIAL VEHICLE. YES. NO TAG. NO. NO TAG. YEAH. NO TAG. NO.
NOTHING ON IT. OKAY. WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING TAG. OKAY. FIVE, FIVE. THAT'S A CLOSE UP VIEW. ON THE SIDE. ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE HOUSE. OKAY. LOOKS LIKE PILES OF JUNK. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. SIX, SIX. THAT'S THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY. IT'S GOT A RUG. YEAH, THERE'S RUG. LIKE, LOOKS LIKE A MICROWAVE. YEAH. OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. OKAY. AWESOME DEBRIS THERE. SEVEN, SEVEN. WE GOT, LIKE, SOME BROKEN WOOD PALLETS. IT LOOKS MAYBE LIKE A LAWNMOWER THAT'S COVERED UP BY. BY LIKE A UNDER THE TARP. UNDER THE BLUE TARP. YEAH. AND THEN THE BLACK MUSTANG IN THE BACK. IT'S GOT FLAT TIRES. ALL RIGHT. EIGHT EIGHT. SO THIS IS AN EARLY MORNING PICTURE ON WHEN
[00:05:03]
LIKE ALL THE VEHICLES ARE THERE. OKAY. THEY GOT THE COMMERCIAL ONES ON THE RIGHT. SO THE WHITE SUV IS TAGGED. YES THE WHITE. HOW ABOUT THE TRUCK LIKE THAT. ALL THE WAY TRUCK NEXT DOOR TO A PICKUP NEXT TO IT TO THE LEFT. SO THE TRUCK ALL THE WAY TO THE LEFT HAS DOES HAVE A TAG. OKAY, I SEE THE TAG AND IT'S CURRENT. YES. OKAY. THEN THE TO THE RIGHT OF THE SUV IS THAT SAME VEHICLE THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT EARLIER THAT HAS NO TAG. CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN TO ITS RIGHT, THE WHITE TRUCK. YES. IT'S A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE THAT'S NOT ALLOWED OKAY. IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING. ALL RIGHT. GOT IT. ALL RIGHT. AND NINE IS THE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AGAIN.CORRECT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GOOD. I THINK WE'RE CAUGHT UP. BASED ON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON MAY 6TH, 2025, FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 17TH, 2025. THIS NOTICE IS SUBMITTED AT EXHIBIT TEN. OKAY. THE NOTICE CITED THE CODE VIOLATIONS MENTIONED IN MY TESTIMONY AND INFORMED THE RESPONDENT THAT THE VIOLATION MUST BE CORRECTED BY MAY 24TH, 2025. IT ALSO ADVISED THE RESPONDENT TO CONTACT THE VILLAGE CODE ENFORCEMENT. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AND POSTED AT VILLAGE HALL. THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS IS SUBMITTED AS FOLLOWS.
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT ON MAY 20TH. ON MAY 9TH, 2025, ALSO WITH TRACKING MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT 11. OKAY UPS TRACKING USPS TRACKING OF EXHIBIT 12. AND A RETURN RECEIPT WAS RECEIVED ON MAY 30TH, 2025, WHICH IS A PHOTOCOPY WHICH IS EXHIBIT 13. WAIT A MINUTE. THIS IS INTERESTING. IF YOU LOOK AT EXHIBIT 12, WHICH IS THE TRACKING INFORMATION, IT SHOWS THAT IT WAS DELIVERED. SO IT WAS BASICALLY DELIVERED BACK TO US. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. YEAH. BECAUSE IF YOU READ DOWN FURTHER IT SAYS UNCLAIMED. YES. LEFT NOTICE. OKAY. SO THEN IT WAS RETURNED TO YOU ON IT WAS RETURNED TO ME ON MAY 30TH, 2025. NOT DELIVERABLE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN BUT THAT'S THE ADDRESS ON THE PROPERTY APPRAISER. YES. OKAY. THE PROPERTY POSTING IS EXHIBIT 14. MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE EXHIBIT 15. I HAVE I HAVE SPOKE WITH WITH THE DAUGHTER UPON MY POSTING ON JUNE 6TH. SHE SAID SHE WASN'T AWARE OF EVERYTHING, BUT I DID MEET WITH THE DAD.
THIS WAS BACK IN MARCH WHEN WE FIRST SENT THE COURTESY LETTER. YEAH, WE GAVE HIM AN EXTENSION.
HE NEVER COMPLIED. OKAY. AND THEN SHE SAW MY POSTING. SHE SAID SHE WAS GOING TO KEEP, YOU KNOW, CALL ME SO WE COULD SIT DOWN WITH DINA AND COME TO AN AGREEMENT. AND I NEVER RECEIVED ANY CALLS. AND THEN. ON JUNE 6TH, I HAD A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND CONFIRMED THE VIOLATION STILL EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. SO 16. YES, WHICH IS 16 THROUGH 19. OKAY. BUT ALSO ON THE 16TH. RIGHT. YOU SAID SIX ON THE SIXTH. SORRY. 16. OH YEAH. ON THE 16TH. YEAH. OKAY. I THINK WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME THING. SO YOU GOT 16, 1718 AND 1919 SHOWING VEHICLES WE'VE DISCUSSED EARLIER. YES. JUST DIFFERENT TIME. OKAY. NO, NO CHANGE TO THE PROPERTY. I CAN SEE THE JUNK AND THE OTHER STUFF. SO I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 19 BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE BASED ON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE PRESENTED. I REQUEST THE
[00:10:04]
RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITED PROVISION. BY JULY 16TH, 2025. IF THE PROPERTY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THAT DATE, I REQUEST THAT A FINE OF $100 PER VIOLATION FOR EVERY DAY VIOLATION CONTINUES THEREAFTER. ADDITIONALLY, THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COST AND THE AMOUNT OF 150 RELATED TO THIS INVESTIGATION. THE. I REQUESTED THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY. ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF JUAN MIGUEL MATEO? LOOKING OUT, SEEING NO ONE? WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE. THE VILLAGE IS EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 19. IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY, I'LL FIND THAT VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED DO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. IN ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE JULY 16TH, 2025. FAILING WHICH WOULD FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE.AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE JULY 16TH, 2025. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NEXT CASE IS NUMBER THREE ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE 25080 FOR THE PROPERTY OF 17123 SOUTHWEST MAGNOLIA STREET. AND THE OWNER IS CAPITAL C INC. I DON'T SEE ANYBODY FROM CAPITAL C. WE'RE BACK TO YOU, OFFICER ALONZO. YOU'VE BEEN SWORN IN. SO. SO THIS CASE, 2580, HAS COMPLIED BEFORE. IT'S TIME. OKAY. LET ME JUST. OKAY, SO IT'S NOT FILES NOT HERE. NO. IT DID COMPLY. IT JUST DIDN'T UPDATE IT ON HERE. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE. WHAT WAS THAT OKAY. OUTDOOR STORAGE. AND ANIMALS OKAY. SO YOU DON'T NEED A FINAL ORDER. NO. AND DO WE NEED A ORDER NOT TO REPEAT SINCE THEY COMPLIED, BUT PROBABLY AFTER THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE. SO THEY COMPLIED BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR. OH, THEY DID OKAY. THAT'S WHY I JUST PUT IT AS COMPLIED. THEN IT'S THAT'S WHAT WE'LL DO. COMPLIED. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ONE IS CASE NUMBER 25 08114762 SOUTHWEST 1/75 COURT. AND OWNER IS SANDRA LYNETTE HAMILTON. AND.
OWEN. WELL NOT SURE. PINK OWEN LLOYD JR ANY OF THOSE NAMES COULD WORK. AND JUST. OKAY. GOT THE FILE WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS STEVEN ALONSO. RAMIREZ AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. I AM A CO COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. AND THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY FOLLOWING MY INSPECTION BACK IN DECEMBER 12TH, 2024. IN THAT TIME, A COURTESY LETTER WAS SENT TO THE RESPONDENT, WHICH YOU'LL SEE RIGHT BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBITS NUMBER ONE. OKAY. THEN AFTER NO COMPLIANCE FOLLOWED AFTER THE 90 DAY TIME FRAME FROM 1ST TO MAY 12TH, 2025, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION TO THE RESPONDENT, WHICH THE RESPONDENT IS MRS. SANDRA LYNETTE HAMILTON AND PINK OWEN LLOYD JR, WHO IS NOT HERE TODAY. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14762 SOUTHWEST 175TH COURT IN INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERS. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS OWNED BY HAMILTON, SANDRA, LYNETTE, AND PINK OWEN LLOYD JUNIOR. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY, APPRAISER'S RECORDS CONFIRMING OWNERSHIP IS SUBMITTED TO YOU AS EXHIBITS NUMBER TWO. ON MAY 5TH, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND OBSERVED THE VIOLATIONS UNDER SECTION 67201, NUISANCE DECLARE.
SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE IN SECTION 21.1 21 WINDOWS, SKYLIGHTS AND DOOR FRAMES. AT THE TIME, I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY, AND THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY REPRESENT WHAT I
[00:15:02]
OBSERVED, AND THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX, SEVEN, AND EIGHT. OKAY, I THINK ACTUALLY I CAN SEE ALL OF THOSE JUST BY THUMBING THROUGH THE PHOTOS. SO GO AHEAD. BASED ON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON MAY 12TH, 2025 FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 17TH, 2025.THE NOTICE IS SUBMITTED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBITS NUMBER NINE. THE NOTICE CITED THE CODE VIOLATIONS MENTIONED IN MY TESTIMONY AND INFORMED THE RESPONDENT THAT THE VIOLATION MUST BE CORRECTED BY JUNE 11TH, 2025. IT ALSO ADVISED THE RESPONDENT TO CONTACT THE VILLAGE CODE ENFORCEMENT. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL POSTING OF THE PROPERTY, WITH POSTING AT VILLAGE HALL, AND THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS IS SUBMITTED AS FOLLOWS. CERTIFIED MAILS AT EXHIBITS NUMBER TEN USPS TRACKING AS EXHIBIT NUMBER 11 WITH A SIGNATURE AS EXHIBIT NUMBER 12 WITH A POSTING OF THE PROPERTY AS EXHIBIT NUMBER 13. AND MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AS EXHIBIT NUMBER 14. OKAY, I HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE DAUGHTER OF THE RESPONDENT, AND SHE EXPLAINED THAT THEY WERE GOING THROUGH SOME HARDSHIP. THEY DIDN'T HAVE A VEHICLE AT THE TIME, OR THE VEHICLE THAT THEY DID HAVE WAS HAVING ISSUES, AND THEY NEEDED SOME MORE TIME.
ON JUNE 6TH, 2025 AND JUNE 16TH, 2025, I CONDUCTED A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND CONFIRMED THE VIOLATION STILL EXISTED ON THE PROPERTY, WITH THE EXCEPTION ON ON JUNE 16TH. THE DOOR HAD BEEN REPLACED. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AGAIN AND THE IMAGE ACCURATELY REFLECTS WHAT I HAD OBSERVED. AND THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS EXHIBITS 15, 16, 17, 18. 19, OKAY, 15 THROUGH THROUGH 18 WERE TAKEN ON THE 6TH OF JUNE. SO THEY'RE ON THE 6TH OF JUNE. AND THEN I WENT BACK ON THE 16TH, OKAY. WHICH YOU'LL SEE KIND OF THE SAME PHOTOS. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS, IS THAT THE FRONT DOOR HAS ACTUALLY BEEN REPLACED WITH AN ACTUAL DOOR. OH YEAH, I SEE IT. OKAY. SO 19, 20 AND 21 WERE TAKEN ON THE 16TH. YES. ALL RIGHT. AND. DID I REPLACE THE DOOR WITH DID IT NEED A PERMIT OR. NO. NO IT DIDN'T REQUIRE A PERMIT FOR THE DOOR OKAY. OKAY. SO THAT. SO THAT'S THE 21.121 VIOLATION RIGHT. YES. THAT ONE'S OUT. COMPLIED. WELL THE 21.1 21 IS ALSO A REFERENCE TO THE WINDOWS. OH SOME OF THE WINDOWS ARE MISSING PARTIAL COMPLIANCE. IT'S ONLY PARTIAL COMPLIED OKAY, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. JUST THE DOOR. ALL RIGHT. SO BACK IN OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD. AT THIS TIME I DO REQUEST THAT ALL VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 21 BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE. AND BASED ON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE PRESENT, I REQUEST A RESPOND TO BE ORDERED TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS BY JULY 15TH, 2025. IF THE PROPERTY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THAT DATE, I REQUEST THAT A FINE OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES THEREAFTER. ADDITIONALLY, THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COST IN THE AMOUNT OF 150 RELATED TO THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. ALL RIGHT. AND I'M SORRY, THE DATE YOU'RE ASKING FOR COMPLIANCE IS SEVEN, SEVEN, 15, 25. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GOOD. ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF SANDRA, LYNETTE HAMILTON OR OWEN? OWEN LLOYD JR, SEEING NO ONE. WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 21. IN THIS CASE,
[00:20:05]
BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE IN YOUR TESTIMONY, FIND THAT VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED DO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. NOTING PARTIAL COMPLIANCE BY REPLACEMENT OF THE FRONT DOOR. ALSO, I'M GOING TO ORDER COMPLIANCE ORDER BEFORE. JULY 15TH, 2025, FAILING WHICH YOU'LL FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE JULY 15TH, 2025. OKAY. NEXT ONE IS CASE NUMBER 25 083 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 663 SOUTHWEST 1/69 DRIVE, AND THE OWNER IS VIDEO PEDRO DOMINGO AND OFFICER NARANJO.YOU'VE BEEN SWORN IN WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. YES. THIS IS CASE 2508 THREE DOMINGO. OLIVIA.
PEDRO. GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS JONATHAN NARANJO, AND I'VE BEEN SWORN IN. I'M A CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY FOLLOWING MY INSPECTION ON MAY 7TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE IS DOMINGO OVIDIO PEDRO, WHICH IS NOT PRESENT TODAY. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED LOCATED AT 14 663 SOUTHWEST 1/69 DRIVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY DOMINGO OVIDIO PEDRO. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECORDS CONFIRMING OWNERSHIP IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT ONE ON MAY 7TH, 2025. I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND OBSERVED A VIOLATION UNDER SECTION DASH 331. PERMITTED USES. SECTION 9134 PERSONS IN CHARGE OF PROPERTY NOT TO PERMI, SALVAGE OR DRUNK PROPERTY TO REMAIN ON PREMISES. SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME AND THE PHOTOGRAPH ACCURATELY SHOW ACCURATELY REPRESENT WHAT I OBSERVED. THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS TWO. WHICH IS THE AERIAL VIEW THREE. OKAY FOR. FIVE. YEP. AND SIX OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I SEE THEM ALL. OKAY. BASED ON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON MAY 7TH, 2025 FOR A HEARING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 17TH, 2025. THIS NOTICE IS SUBMITTED AT EXHIBIT SEVEN. THE NOTICE CITED THE CODE VIOLATIONS MENTIONED IN MY TESTIMONY AND INFORMED THE RESPONDENT THAT THE VIOLATION MUST BE CORRECTED ON MAY 24TH, 2025. IT ALSO ADVISED THE RESPONDENT TO CONTACT THE VILLAGE CODE ENFORCEMENT. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT CERTIFIED MAIL POSTED ON ON THE PROPERTY AND POSTED AT VILLAGE HALL. THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS IS SUBMITTED AS FOLLOW. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT ON MAY 9TH, 2025, ALSO WITH TRACKING. MARK. MARK. BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT EIGHT. YOU USPS TRACKING EXHIBIT NINE. A RETURN RECEIPT WAS NOT RECEIVED. THE DELIVERY SIGNATURES. EXHIBIT TEN YEAH.
NO, THAT IS THE THAT'S THAT'S YOUR RECEIPT. THAT'S RIGHT THERE WHERE THE SIGNATURE OF THE RECIPIENT. YEAH. EXHIBIT TEN IS EXHIBIT TEN. YEAH. YOU'RE GOOD. PROPERTY POSTING. EXHIBIT 11.
AND MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE, EXHIBIT 12. OKAY. I DID RECEIVE A CALL ON MAY 16TH, 2025 FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER REGARDING THIS MATTER. HE SPOKE WITH STEPHEN AND I, ASKING FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 DAYS. MR. DOMINGO NEVER CAME INTO COMPLIANCE OR ANSWERED ANY OF MY CALLS OR CALLED ME BACK. ON JUNE 16TH, 2025, I CONDUCTED A CONDUCTED A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND
[00:25:04]
CONFIRMED THE VIOLATIONS STILL EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. THESE ARE SUBMITTED AT EXHIBIT 13. I REQUEST THE VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 13 BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE. BASED ON MY TESTIMONY AND THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED. I REQUEST THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY THE CITED PROVISION BY JULY 15TH, 2025. IF THE PROPERTY IS NOT INTO COMPLIANCE BY THAT DATE, I REQUEST A FINE OF $100 PER VIOLATION FOR EVERYDAY. THE VIOLATION CONTINUES. THEREAFTER. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO IMPOSE A DO NOT REPEAT DUE TO A PRIOR CASE.2217, WHICH HE DID COME INTO COMPLIANCE AND THEN WHICH WHICH SECTION OF THE CODE. IT WAS STILL THE OUTDOOR STORAGE THE JUNK. SO THE 9134. YEAH, IT WAS THE OLD CASE BY OUR OLD INSPECTOR ROB PEREZ. AND DO YOU DO YOU ACTUALLY HAVE THAT WITH. DO YOU, CAN YOU LOOK AT IT AND TELL ME WHICH CASE OR WHICH NUT CASE NUMBER, WHICH SECTION? NUMBER OF THE CODE. SO IT IS. HE HAS SECTION 9132 ABANDONED SALVAGE AND JUNK PROPERTY. ALL RIGHT. AND YOU'RE CHARGING 9134.
LET'S DO THIS. THIS IS A VIOLATION. I MEAN I CAN SEE IT. AND HE DIDN'T COME INTO COMPLIANCE, AT LEAST ON OR BEFORE THE 16TH OF JUNE. I'M NOT SURE I'VE GOT ENOUGH TO MAKE IT A REPEAT VIOLATION BECAUSE WE'VE CHARGED SOMETHING DIFFERENTLY. AND EVERY FINAL ORDER HAS DO NOT REPEAT LANGUAGE IN IT. SO I'M I'M GOING TO JUST ON THE DOCKET. I'M JUST GOING TO STRIKE THAT.
BUT IT IS GOING TO BE A VIOLATION BASED ON YOUR TESTIMONY. SO ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF. OVIDIO PEDRO DOMINGO SEEING NO ONE I WOULD I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO IMPOSE. GO AHEAD.
ADDITIONALLY, THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COST AND AN AMOUNT OF $150 RELATED TO THE INVESTIGATION. OKAY. I REQUEST THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED IN THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. ALL RIGHT. SORRY TO CUT YOU SHORT. ANYWAY, AS I WAS STARTING TO SAY, THIS IS GOING TO BE A VIOLATION. SO THERE'S NO ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER IN THIS CASE. BASED UPON YOUR TESTIMONY AND THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, WHICH WAS ITEMS ONE THROUGH 13, IN THIS CASE, I'M GOING TO FIND THE VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED DO EXIST. ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE JULY 15TH, 2025, FAILING WHICH YOU'LL FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE, AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE OWNER BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE IN THIS CASE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AFTER THE HEARING, WE CAN WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT WHOLE CONCEPT OF DO NOT REPEAT AND REPEAT VIOLATION, WHICH IS DIFFERENT YET. SO OKAY OKAY GOOD. ALL RIGHT. SO THE NEXT ONE IS NUMBER SIX ON THE DOCKET IS CASE NUMBER 250 9 OR 8 FOUR FOR THE PROPERTY AT ONE 4949 SOUTHWEST 1/70 AVENUE. AND THE OWNER IS STEVIE W FRANKLIN. AND THAT'S ALSO YOUR CASE? YES. WHAT HAVE WE GOT? GO AHEAD WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS JONATHAN NARANJO, AND I'VE BEEN SWORN IN. I'M A COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY FOLLOWING MY INSPECTION ON MAY 8TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE IS FRANKLIN STEVIE W NOT PRESENT TODAY. THE CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 949 SOUTHWEST 1/70 AVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, THE PROPERTY IS OWNED
[00:30:01]
BY FRANKLIN STEVIE W. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECORDS CONFIRMING OWNERSHIP IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT ONE. OKAY. ON MAY 8TH, 2025, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND OBSERVED A VIOLATION UNDER SECTION 67 201 NUISANCE DECLARED WITH SUBSECTION 67 201 A WEEDS AND 67 201B TRASH THE PHOTOGRAPH. THE PHOTOGRAPH, THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME AND THE PHOTOGRAPH ACCURATELY, ACCURATELY REPRESENT WHAT I OBSERVED. THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS TWO. THREE AND FOUR. ALL RIGHT. TWO IS THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S AERIAL SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY. EXHIBIT THREE SHOWS A TRASH PILE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. YEAH, A VACANT LOT. IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH. I JUST TOOK, LIKE A STREET PICTURE OF THE VACANT LOT. OKAY. AND THE VACANT LOT. NOW, A LOT OF TIMES TRASH ENDS UP ON THOSE VACANT LOTS, AND PEOPLE JUST PUT THEM ON THE RIGHT OF WAY AND JUST PEOPLE JUST KEEP DUMPING. OF COURSE THEY DO. IS THE VACANT LOT ALSO OUT OF COMPLIANCE? IS IT OVERGROWN? YES. IT'S OVERGROWN. I'M LOOKING AT FOUR. IT LOOKS LIKE EXHIBIT FOUR, IF THAT'S THE LOT. AND IS THAT BUILDING THAT SHED, IS THAT ON THE OR GARAGE? WHATEVER IT IS. NO, THAT'S NOT PART OF ADJACENT. YES OKAY. OKAY. GO AHEAD. BASED ON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON MAY 8TH, 2025 FOR A HEARING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 17TH, 2025. THIS NOTICE IS SUBMITTED AT EXHIBIT FIVE. THE NOTICE CITED THE CODE VIOLATION MENTIONED IN MY TESTIMONY AND INFORMED THE RESPONDENT THAT THE VIOLATION MUST BE CORRECTED BY MAY 28TH, 2025. IT ALSO ADVISED THE RESPONDENT TO CONTACT THE VILLAGE CODE ENFORCEMENT. UPON DOING SO. THE NOTICE WAS MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AND POSTED AT VILLAGE HALL. THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS SUBMITTED AS FOLLOWS. CERTIFIED MAIL ON MAY 13TH, MARKED AS EXHIBIT SIX.USPS TRACKING EXHIBIT SEVEN. A RETURN RECEIPT. WAS RECEIVED ON JUNE 6TH. EXHIBIT EIGHT. IT WAS RETURNED TO US HERE AT VILLAGE HALL. PROPERTY POSTING. EXHIBIT NINE. AN AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE.
EXHIBIT TEN. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY CALLS, EMAILS OR LETTER FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER REGARDING THIS MATTER. ON MAY 30TH AND ON JUNE 16TH, 2025, I CONDUCTED CONDUCTED A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND CONFIRMED THE VIOLATION STILL EXISTS ON THE PROPERTY. THESE ARE SUBMITTED AT EXHIBITS 11 AND 12. I REQUEST. WAIT A MINUTE NOW. SO LET ME SEE IF I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE CHARGING YOU. YOU'VE CITED 67 201 JUST GENERALLY, WHICH IS BOTH 201. A IS WHAT TRASH AND THE OTHER ONE IS GRASS, B A IS GRASS. AND YEAH, OKAY. B IS TRASH. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW THE TRASH IS NO LONGER THERE. YEAH I SEE THAT. THAT'S WHAT I WAS WONDERING ABOUT. AND THAT WAS PICKED UP.
WHAT PRESUMABLY BY WASTE MANAGEMENT. SO YEAH THERE WAS A BIG CLEANUP THAT WAS DONE. BUT IT'S A PROBLEM AREA. THERE'S ALWAYS. THERE'S ALWAYS DUMPING ON IT. BUT YES THE TRASH WAS CLEANED UP. ALL RIGHT. LET ME SUGGEST THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO CHARGE BOTH THINGS DO BOTH A AND B. JUST SO YOU KNOW I DID JUST SO YOU CAN SEPARATE THEM OUT. LET ME JUST SEE OKAY. SO YEAH I SEE IT A AND B ON THE CHARGING DOCUMENT OKAY. SO IT JUST DIDN'T THAT JUST DIDN'T GET INTO THE
[00:35:02]
DOCKET A B. SO THIS IS A. OKAY. GOOD I'M WITH YOU. ALL RIGHT. AND WE'VE GOT EXHIBITS WHAT 11.AND THAT WAS EXHIBIT 11 AND 12 OKAY I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 12 BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE BASED ON MY TESTIMONY AND THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED. I REQUEST THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS BY JULY 15TH, 2025. IF THE PROPERTY IS NOT INTO COMPLIANCE BY THAT DATE, I REQUEST $100 PER VIOLATION FOR EVERY DAY. THE VIOLATION CONTINUES THEREAFTER. ADDITIONALLY, VILLAGE HAS INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COST AND AMOUNT OF $150. RELATED TO THIS INVESTIGATION. I REQUEST THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED IN THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. ALRIGHTY. THANK YOU. OKAY, SO ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF STEVIE W FRANKLIN? OKAY. NOW SEEING NO ONE. I GUESS WHAT I'M WONDERING IS WHETHER YOU WHETHER YOU ACTUALLY GOT. YOU'VE GOT LEGAL NOTICE BECAUSE YOU SENT IT TO THE PROPERTY.
APPRAISER'S ADDRESS AND YOU POSTED. BUT DID YOU ACTUALLY GET ACTUAL NOTICE TO THIS PERSON? NO, NO. YEAH. IT WAS RETURNED TO VILLAGE. ALL RIGHT. SO THEY DON'T REALLY NECESSARILY EVEN KNOW THAT THEY'RE IN VIOLATION, WHICH IS A LITTLE FRUSTRATING. BUT NOT NOT YOUR PROBLEM TECHNICALLY. OKAY. SO SINCE NO ONE'S HERE ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER, I'M GOING TO ACCEPT INDEPENDENCE. THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 12IN THIS CASE. BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT VIOLATION AS CHARGED DOES EXIST ON THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS THE 67 201, A OVERGROWN LOT. AND ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE JULY 15TH, 2025. ALSO GOING TO. NOTE THAT IF THE VIOLATION IS NOT CURED BY THAT TIME, THAT A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY, PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE, AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ONE IS NUMBER SEVEN ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 25085 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14648.
SOUTHWEST DOCTOR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR DRIVE AND OWNER IS CANDACE HOUSING CORP. AND OFFICER LONZO YOU'RE GOING TO TESTIFY. GOOD MORNING. FOR CASE NUMBER 2508 FIVE AT THE PROPERTY AT 14648 SOUTHWEST DOCTOR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE. YES. I AM ASKING FOR A 60 DAY CONTINUANCE.
I HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE RESPONDENT, ME AND MY DIRECTOR, DEENA, AND WE ARE WORKING WITH HER AND ALSO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. BUT SHE IS GOING TO NEED SOME TIME DUE TO THE EXTENT OF WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. SO I'M ASKING IF I COULD GET A 60 DAY EXTENSION. WELL, CONTINUANCE ON THIS CASE. OKAY. AND WHAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THAT PROPERTY? SO THE PROPERTY IS A. IT'S DUPLEXES. AND ON ONE OF THE BUILDINGS PARTIALLY THE STRUCTURE, TWO UNITS HAVE BEEN CONDEMNED BY OUR BUILDING OFFICIAL. SO WE ARE CURRENTLY WORKING WITH THE RESPONDENT ON PULLING A DEMO PERMIT, BUT ALSO WAITING ON SPEAKING WITH THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO FIND MORE GUIDELINES ON WHAT THEY NEED TO DO TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT DEMO PERMIT. OKAY. AND THE OWNER IS WORKING WITH THE VILLAGE? YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO. 60 DAYS TAKES US TWO. AUGUST 19TH HEARING. YES. WE'LL SET IT FOR THE AUGUST 19TH HEARING.ED
[00:40:06]
UPON YOUR. TESTIMONY. AND SO.ALSO FOR THE FOLLOWING CASE THAT'S ON THE DOCKET FOR 2587. THAT ONE ALSO COMPLIED BEFORE IT'S TIME. JUST SO WASN'T UPDATED ON THE DOCKET. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. LET ME GET THIS ONE DOWN FIRST. SORRY. IT'S LIKE.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. LET'S CONTINUE TO 819. ALL RIGHT. AND THE NEXT CASE. IS 2587. IS THAT THE ONE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT? YES, THAT'S THE ONE I'M TALKING ABOUT THAT COMPLIED BEFORE THE TIME DUE. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT IS. COMPLIED. WHAT WAS THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE. DO YOU REMEMBER THAT ONE WAS SET. THAT ONE WAS SET TO. AUGUST 19TH IS FOR 2585, WHICH WAS THE CONTINUANCE DATE, BUT FOR 2587, THAT ONE WAS CONTINUED. OR THE DATA COMPLIANCE WAS. I'M SORRY, I'M PULLING IT UP. 630 2025 OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GOOD. OKAY. SO NUMBER NINE IS CASE NUMBER 25088 PROPERTY AT 15 348 SOUTHWEST 1/50 STREET. AND THE RESPONDENTS ARE MICHAELA FRANCISCO AND FRANCISCO FRANCISCO. AND THAT'S A STIPULATION. YES. SO THIS IS A STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER BEFORE A NOTICE OF VIOLATION. OKAY. WAIT A MINUTE. NO, I DON'T HAVE THAT ONE, DO I? LET ME JUST SAY 88. YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. YEAH. I'VE GOT THE EVIDENCE. LET'S GO THROUGH THAT. OKAY. YOU CAN JUST IF YOU WANT TO. WE PROBABLY YOU WANT TO GET THESE EXHIBITS INTO EVIDENCE. YES. SO GO AHEAD AND JUST READ. READ THROUGH IT LIKE IT WAS A REGULAR. DO YOU HAVE THE SCRIPT FOR IT OR. NO. YES. YEAH. GO AHEAD, GO AHEAD. LET'S. SO MY NAME IS STEVEN ALONZO RAMIREZ AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. I AM A CO COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY FOLLOWING MY INSPECTION ON MAY 14TH, 2025. AND THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE IS FRANCISCO MIGALA AND FRANCISCO FRANCISCO, WHO IS NOT HERE TODAY. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15348 SOUTHWEST 150TH STREET. IN UNIONTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERS, THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY FRANCISCO MICAELA AND FRANCISCO FRANCISCO CAPRIO. THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECORDS CONFIRMING OWNERSHIP IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBITS NUMBER ONE ON MAY 14TH, 2025, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS. OUTDOOR STORAGE SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE. ALSO WITH SECTION 33.1 PERMITTED USES AND ALSO SECTION 67.201 NUISANCE DECLARED. AT THE TIME I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY, AND THE PHOTOS ACCURATELY REPRESENT WHAT I OBSERVED, AND THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS VILLAGE TO. THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX SEVEN, EIGHT AND
[00:45:17]
NINE. AT THE TIME I POSTED A DOOR HANGER AND I ALSO SPOKE WITH A GENTLEMAN AT THE PROPERTY AND EXPLAINED THE VIOLATIONS AT HAND. HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO GET IN CONTACT WITH THE OWNER SO THE OWNER COULD CONTACT ME. I DID LATER RECEIVE A CALL FROM MRS. MICAELA FRANCISCO AND I ALSO EXPLAINED THE VIOLATIONS TO HER, AND WE CAME INTO A STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE BY JUNE 13TH, 2025. SHE CAME IN ON JUNE 2ND TO SIGN AND PAY FOR HER STIPULATION AND AGREED. ORDER, AS YOU SEE BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBITS NUMBER TEN AND 11. ON JUNE 13TH, 2025, I DID A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY LISTED BEFORE YOU.I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AND LISTED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT NUMBER 12 AND 13 IS EVIDENCE THAT SHE HAD CAME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE VIOLATIONS LISTED. AND THE STIPULATION AND THE AGREED ORDER. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY. GOOD. HAPPY ENDING. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. SO, LOOKING AT THE STIPULATION. SITUATION, REQUIRE COMPLIANCE BY THE 13TH OF JUNE, FAILING WHICH I FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY WOULD ACCRUE, $50 HAD BEEN PAID TO THE VILLAGE. SIGNED BY MICAELA FRANCISCO AND OFFICER ALONSO. OKAY, SO I'M GOING TO APPROVE THE AGREED ORDER BASED ON THE EVIDENCE AND COMPLIANCE. I'M GOING TO ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS, ONE THROUGH. I'M SORRY, PAUL, SO I KNOW I HAVE IT HERE AS EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 13, BUT THERE WAS A PAGE THAT I FAILED TO STAMP WITHIN EXHIBIT. THAT WAS THE PAY THE. SO IT'S 11. LET'S SEE. SO IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN AFTER NINE. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXHIBIT TEN.
BUT I SKIPPED THAT EVIDENCE STIPULATION AFTER EXHIBIT NINE IS ANOTHER EVIDENCE SHEET. OH, THERE'S ANOTHER PAGE. YEAH, THERE'S ANOTHER PAGE BEHIND IT. SO WE COULD KIND OF CALL THAT ONE EXHIBITS NINE A, NINE A. OKAY. YEAH, I SEE THAT. AND THAT WAS ALSO TAKEN ON THE 14TH OF MAY. YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. FUTURE. FUTURE CASES. THE STIPULATION ACTUALLY ISN'T NECESSARILY AN EXHIBIT IN YOUR CASE. IT IS BECAUSE NOT ONLY DID SHE SIGN IT, BUT SHE COMPLIED.
SO IT'S KIND OF A WEIRD ODDBALL. USUALLY THAT WOULDN'T BE THE THAT WOULD JUST BE THE ORDER, YOU KNOW. BUT BUT IN THIS CASE SHE DID COMPLY. SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 13 IN THIS CASE. ONE THROUGH 30. SO IT WOULD BE 14 IN TOTAL. OH YEAH. JUST WITH THE EXCEPTION OF NINE A YEAH. SO IT'S 14 SEPARATE BITS OF INFORMATION, BUT IT'S. YOU'LL JUST HAVE TO LOG NINE A AS NINE A. ALL RIGHT. BASED UPON THE STIPULATION, I'M GOING TO FIND IT'S APPROPRIATE TO ENTER THE AGREED ORDER CAME BEFORE ME ON 3,000,072. AND 25.
ALL RIGHT. A LITTLE STRANGE TO HAVE IT AFTER COMPLIANCE, BUT. IT'S OKAY.
[00:50:16]
ALL RIGHT. NOTICE IN THE ORDER. AND THAT SECOND PARAGRAPH, IT'S. REMINDS THE RESPONDENT THAT IF THEY COMPLY WITH THE ORDER AND SUBSEQUENTLY VIOLATE THE SAME CODE SECTION WITHIN A FIVE YEAR PERIOD, SUCH REOCCURS DOES SUBJECT THE RESPONDENT TO A FINE OF UP TO $500 PER VIOLATION PER DAY AS A REPEAT VIOLATOR. SO THAT ANSWERS YOUR YOUR QUESTION EARLIER ABOUT, YOU KNOW, ASKING FOR A DO NOT REPEAT ORDER. IT'S IN THIS ORDER. IT'S IN VIOLATION ORDERS. THAT LANGUAGE IS THERE.SO JUST IT'S GOOD THAT MAKE SURE THAT THE OWNER GETS A COPY OF THAT AGREED ORDER JUST SO THAT SHE UNDERSTANDS THAT SHE WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A REPEAT VIOLATION. YES. SO SHE I DID GIVE HER A COPY OF THE DAY SHE CAME IN TO SIGN. SO SHE HAS ONE. ALL RIGHT. WELL, SHE DOESN'T HAVE IT WITH MY SIGNATURE ON IT, SO YEAH, I'LL GIVE HER ANOTHER ONE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO ONE 313. NOW COMPLIED. OKAY. I WILL TAKE CARE OF THAT ONE. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE WHAT WE GOT. NUMBER TEN, CASE NUMBER 24 179 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 547 SOUTHWEST SANDY OAKS LOOP.
AND PROPERTY OWNERS ARE. CRISTOBAL PEREZ OR BACKWARDS. AND JULISSA PEREZ ROBLERO. ALL RIGHT. AND THIS WAS A PERMIT VIOLATION. BUT IT'S A STIPULATED CASE, RIGHT. FOR A FINE REDUCTION REQUEST FOR FINE REDUCTION. YES. SO THIS CASE FOR 24 179 ACTUALLY CAME FOR IMPOSITION BACK APRIL 15TH, 2025 FOR FINE REDUCTION. OKAY. AND IN ON THAT DATE YOU ORDERED A STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER AND REDUCED THE FINE TO $880. YES, HE DID COME IN AND PAID HIS 880 A COUPLE DAYS AFTER THE TIME SET TO PAY. BUT ALSO, I WOULD LIKE TO PUT ON THE RECORD THAT WITHIN THAT TIME I'VE HAD A NUMBER CHANGE, AND ALSO I WAS OUT SICK FOR QUITE A BIT. SO DUE TO THAT THE COMMUNICATION WAS VERY NOT THERE. SO I WASN'T ABLE TO GET AHOLD OF HIM AND HE WASN'T ABLE TO GET AHOLD OF ME DUE TO ME CHANGING THE NUMBER PHONE NUMBER. SO HE FINALLY CAME IN AND PAID. I WAS ACTUALLY ABLE TO GET AHOLD OF HIM, TO HAVE HIM COME IN AND PAY HIS STIPULATION AND AGREED. ORDER. OKAY, SO BASICALLY WE HAD AN ORAL STIPULATION AT THE APRIL 15TH.
THIS JUST REDUCES IT TO WRITING BASICALLY. YES. YEAH. OKAY. AND THAT'S GOOD. AND THE 880 HAS BEEN PAID. YES. 80 IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WAS PAID. OKAY. AND I THINK I MUST HAVE TAKEN EVIDENCE AT THAT POINT. BUT I NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT THERE IS A RECEIPT ATTACHED. FOR THE COST OF $150. AND HERE'S A COPY OF THE VIOLATION ORDER. EARLIER. WELL, DON'T HAVE ALL FIVE PAGES, BUT THAT'S OKAY. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. SO. NO ONE'S HERE ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER I SEE. AND THAT'S FINE, I DON'T. WELL, ELSA PEREZ VALERO SIGNED. YES. THE WIFE CAME IN AND SIGNED. OKAY. ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERS AND OFFICER ALONSO, YOU DID ON BEHALF OF THE VILLAGE.
THOSE AREN'T DATED, BUT I'M GOING TO FIND THAT IT'S APPROPRIATE TO ACCEPT THE ORDER AS THE STIPULATION AS PRESENTED. AND I'M GOING TO CHANGE THE DATE. TO TODAY'S DATE.
[00:55:21]
OKAY.ALL RIGHT. AND ONCE AGAIN, YOU'RE GOING TO SEND A COPY OF THE STIPULATION TO THE RESPONDENT. YES. ALL RIGHT. AND. THAT WAS. 100. AND. THIS WILL BE PAID. OKAY.
GOOD. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE IN OUR SPECIALLY SET CASES WE'VE GOT CASE NUMBER 25049 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 948 SOUTHWEST 1/73 AVENUE. AND THIS IS EDITH PEREZ MARROQUIN AND OFFICER NARANJO. ARE YOU LOOKING FOR A CONTINUANCE TO AUGUST? SO? SO THIS IS AN OLD CASE FROM MARCH ON MARCH 18TH. YOU YOU GAVE THEM A 90 DAY EXTENSION. OKAY. HE OWNS BOTH PROPERTIES. SO IT'LL BE CASE 24, 49 AND 20, I MEAN 2549 AND 2550 50. OKAY. HE BROUGHT 2550 INTO COMPLIANCE AND 2549 HE MET WITH DINA AND MYSELF. AND HE IS IN THE WORKS OF. CONSOLIDATING THE VACANT LOT WITH THE HOUSE AS ONE SINGLE PARCEL. OKAY. AND WE'RE TRYING TO GIVE HIM ANOTHER 60 DAYS. HE DID SUBMIT. HE DID GIVE ME PAPERWORK FROM HIS LAWYER ON LIKE WHAT THEY'VE SUBMITTED ALREADY. OKAY. IS LET ME JUST SEE. IS THAT IN THE PACKET HERE? NO, I DIDN'T PUT IT INTO THE PACKET. BUT I HAVE IT RIGHT HERE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT. ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO THROUGH YOUR EVIDENCE. I SEE EXHIBIT ONE, WHICH IS THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S SHEET. YES. AND THEN EXHIBIT. TWO. EXHIBIT TWO. THAT'S THE VACANT LOT WITH TWO AND THREE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WITH THE TRUCKS. CARS ON IT. OKAY. AND THAT'S IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO. THE PROPERTY THAT WAS THIS 2049. YEAH. THEY'RE THEY'RE 225 ZERO 50. YEAH. THEY'RE RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER AND 50. DOES THAT HAVE A THAT HAS A HOME ON IT. NO. THAT'S ALSO A VACANT LOT OKAY. SO HE HE HE'S COMPLETELY COMPLIED ON THAT ONE OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW EVERYTHING'S JUST ON THIS ONE PROPERTY. CORRECT. OKAY. GOT IT. ALL RIGHT. FOR WAS YOUR NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOTICE OF HEARING SENT FEBRUARY 3RD, 2025. CITING THE VIOLATIONS THAT WE DISCUSSED IN IN MARCH, I GUESS. RIGHT, YES. AND THAT WAS LET'S SEE, THAT WAS THE MARCH HEARING. NEUTRAL. THREE 1825 HEARING.
OKAY. AND THEN. AND EXHIBIT FIVE WAS WHAT? LET'S SEE. THAT'S A MAIL OUT. YES.
THAT WAS THAT THE NOTICE OF HEARING. NOTICE OF VIOLATION. NOTICE OF HEARING. EXACTLY.
[01:00:02]
YEAH. OKAY. SO FIVE SIX AND THEN SIX IS A TRACKING. TRACKING SEVEN IS THE DELIVERY RECEIPT.YES. WITH THE SIGNATURE. AND EIGHT IS THE POSTING. POSTING NINE IS THE POSTING OF THE CONTINUANCE OKAY. AND TEN IS THE AFFIDAVIT FROM THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION IN MARCH. AND 11 IS THE POSTING OF THE CONTINUANCE NOW. YEAH. WE HAND-DELIVERED AND POSTED ON THE PROPERTY. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN 12 IS WHAT THE PROPERTY LOOKS LIKE RIGHT NOW. ALL RIGHT. WHICH MEANS THEY HAVEN'T COME INTO FULL COMPLIANCE. NO. AND DO WE HAVE SOME SORT OF A REQUEST FOR THE CONTINUANCE OR IS THAT STAFF GENERATED. SO BASICALLY WE DINA AND MYSELF BASICALLY TRYING TO GIVE THEM 60 DAYS. HE SAYS HE COULD COME INTO COMPLIANCE. YEAH. HE COULD COME INTO COMPLIANCE BEFORE 60 DAYS. BUT WE JUST WANT TO DO 60 DAYS TO BE SAFE. ALL RIGHT. AND AGAIN YOU'RE YOU'RE WORKING WITH THE OWNER, CORRECT. TO UNIFY THE PROPERTY. I THINK THAT. I SWEAR YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. SO HELP YOU GOD. I DO FULL NAME AND GOOD MORNING, DINA FREEMAN, COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND WORKING WITH JONATHAN ON THE CASE AND WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS. SO WE'VE MET WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN IN THE VILLAGE. WE'VE DONE SITE SITE INSPECTIONS. PART OF THE SOLUTION IS THAT THEY WANT TO COMBINE ONE OF THE VACANT LOTS THAT'S STILL OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES THEY WANT TO ALSO, SO THEY WANT TO DO THAT IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO APPLY FOR A HOME OCCUPATION. AND PART OF THE HOME OCCUPATION DOES ALLOW THE PARKING OF SOME COMMERCIAL VEHICLES, BUT IT STILL HAS TO MEET A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT CRITERIA. SO IN EFFECT, WE'RE PROVIDING ADDITIONAL GUIDELINES AND RESTRICTIONS AS PART OF THE SOLUTION. THEY'RE GOING TO NEED TIME TO DO SOME ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING. THE ACTUAL LEGAL ELEMENT OF COMBINING THE LOTS WITH THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S THE INFORMATION THAT WAS JUST PROVIDED, I THINK YOU JUST RECEIVED TODAY, AND THAT WAS THE WARRANTY DEEDS FROM THE ATTORNEY, AND THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE LOOKING TO PROVIDE THAT SO THEY CAN SUPPORT WITH THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER APPLICATION PROCESS TO COMBINE LOTS. OKAY. SO WHAT I'M LOOKING AT IS ACTUALLY A QUITCLAIM DEED. YEAH. HE'S HE HAS TO PUT HIS NAME ON THE LOT FIRST BECAUSE I GUESS HIS NAME IS NOT ON IT. ALL RIGHT. WHAT WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR IS A UNITY OF TITLE SO THAT THE PROPERTY ACTUALLY GETS UNIFIED. BOTH LOTS. WELL, WE HAVEN'T REQUESTED THAT PER SE BECAUSE HE'S PROVIDING THEY'RE IN THE SAME OWNERSHIP. AND THEN THE PROPERTY APPRAISERS GIVE THEM THE SAME PARCEL CONTROL NUMBER. SO WE HAVEN'T ASKED FOR A UNITY TITLE. WE'VE ASKED FOR THE LOTS TO BE COMBINED. IT'D BE IN THE SAME OWNERSHIP. AND THEN THEY CAN COME IN. IT'S GOT THE SAME ADDRESS AND PARCEL CONTROL. THEY CAN COME IN AND APPLY FOR HOME OCCUPATION THROUGH OUR APPLICATION PROCESS. OKAY. THERE ARE. DIFFERENT UNITIES AND. THE I MEAN ONE OF THEM, THAT OWNERSHIP ISSUE DOESN'T NECESSARILY PREVENT AN OWNER FROM LATER SEPARATING THEM OUT AGAIN. BUT THEN THEY WOULDN'T BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THE HOME OCCUPATION BECAUSE IT HAS TO BE PART OF THE SAME PROPERTY, BUT YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW IT. AND THE WAY YOU CURE THAT IS BY HAVING THEM PUT ON THE PROPERTIES, THE TWO LOTS, THE UNITY OF TITLE, WHICH SAYS THAT ONLY THE VILLAGE CAN RELEASE IT. YEAH, WE COULD DO THAT. SO THERE'S AN EXTRA PROVISION. IT'S A WAY TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE AWARE OF. THEY WANT TO SEPARATE THEM BACK OUT.
SO. UNDERSTOOD OKAY. ALL RIGHT I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS INTO EVIDENCE I DON'T THINK I NEED IT BUT BUT OBVIOUSLY IT MAY BE A FIRST STEP TO DOING WHATEVER IT IS. I THINK JONATHAN WAS JUST MAKING YOU AWARE THAT THE EFFORTS THAT THEY'RE PROGRESSING, THEY'RE DOING THEIR PART, THEY'RE STARTING THE PROCESS. SO THAT WAS WHY THAT WASN'T INCLUDED IN EVIDENCE.
OKAY, GREAT. AND I DON'T REALLY NEED IT IN EVIDENCE EITHER. OKAY. GOOD. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO LET'S SEE. WE DO HAVE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH. 12 IN THIS CASE.
[01:05:09]
ALL RIGHT. SO I'M GOING TO ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 12 THAT THE VILLAGE HAS PRESENTED. AND BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE, YOUR TESTIMONY, THE TESTIMONY OF THE DIRECTOR I'M GOING TO FIND IT. IT'S APPROPRIATE TO EXTEND THE COMPLIANCE DATE, EXTEND THE CONTINUANCE DATE, I GUESS, IS REALLY THE PROPER WAY TO PUT IT UNTIL AUGUST. 19TH, 2025.OKAY, LET ME SEE. ALL RIGHT. WHAT ELSE DO WE HAVE ANYTHING TO COME BEFORE US TODAY? LET'S SEE. WE'VE GOT A COMPLIANCE IN CASE NUMBER 25050 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 968 SOUTHWEST 1/73 AVENUE. THAT WAS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY THAT WE DISCUSSED EARLIER. CORRECT. AND THEN WE HAD. A COUPLE OF CASES COMPLIED PRIOR TO THE HEARING. THOSE ARE LISTED ON A DOCKET OF CASE NUMBER 25 086 AND 25 082. ANYTHING ELSE? ARE WE GOOD? OKAY, GOOD. AND AFTER THE HEARING, IF WE CAN DISCUSS THE ISSUE OF MINUTES AND, AND THEN I'VE GOT A COUPLE OF THINGS TO JUST TALK ABOUT AS FAR AS THESE DO NOT REPEAT ORDERS OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GOOD. SO OUR NEXT HEARING IS JULY 15TH, 2025. AND WE W
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.