[1) CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:03]
JUST LOOKED AT IT. BUT WE CAN. WE CAN START. OKAY, I'M GOING TO CALL TO ORDER THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN FOR MAY 20TH, 2025 AT 10:03 A.M. AND IF YOU'LL PLEASE RISE, JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. OKAY. PLEASE BE SEATED. ALL RIGHT. WELL, WE DON'T HAVE MUCH OF A CROWD HERE TODAY EXCEPT FOR STAFF. BUT WE'RE GOING TO CARRY ON. SO I GUESS NO REASON NOT TO JUST BEGIN AT THE BEGINNING. OKAY? THAT'S WHAT WE'LL DO. ALL RIGHT.
CAN YOU ADJUST YOUR ADJUST YOUR MICROPHONE? I'M SORRY. SAY IT AGAIN. ADJUST YOUR MICROPHONE.
HOW'S THAT. BETTER A LITTLE BIT. IT'S IT SAYS ON. YEAH. YEP. GO AHEAD. OKAY. GOT IT. MAYBE TURN
[3.1) May 20, 2025-Special Magistrate Hearing]
ME UP. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS IS CASE NUMBER 25066. IT'S FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 812 SOUTHWEST 1/68 AVENUE. AND THE RESPONDENTS ARE JOHNNY AND DONNA JONES AND OFFICER NARANJO. YOU'RE GOING TO TESTIFY? ACTUALLY, BOTH OF YOU WANTED TO JUST RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, AND WE'LL DO IT THIS EASY WAY. DO YOU SWEAR OR ATTEST THAT THE TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD? I DO. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I'M SORRY. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. OKAY, SO THIS IS CASE 2506 SIX. MY NAME IS JONATHAN NARANJO, A CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN WAS SWORN IN AND CONDUCTED AN INSPECTION ON APRIL 9TH, 2025 AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14 812 SOUTHWEST 1/68 AVE. MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT ONE. ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY. ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE JOHNNY JONES AND DONNA JONES. MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT TWO. THE. THE INSPECTION IDENTIFIED VIOLATIONS OF THE FOLLOWING VILLAGE CODE STATED IN MY NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT THREE. THE CODE VIOLATIONS ARE. SECTION 33.1 PERMITTED USES. SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE. SECTION THREE 5.8 STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AND BOATS. SECTION 91.32 ABANDONED SALVAGE OR JUNK PROPERTY PROHIBITED. GENERALLY AT THAT TIME I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY. THE PHOTOGRAPH.ACTUALLY, THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS FOUR AND FIVE. THE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE RESPONDENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON APRIL 15TH, 2025, WITH THE TRACKING AND SIGNATURE MARKED BEFORE YOU. AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT SIX AND SEVEN. OKAY, OKAY, A RETURN RECEIPT WAS NOT RECEIVED. ACTUALLY IT WAS. I MEAN, IT'S RIGHT HERE ON SEVEN. SEVEN IS THE SIGNED RECEIPT. IT WAS ELECTRONIC. YES. AND YOU CAN USE THAT FROM NOW ON. THAT'S PERFECT. OKAY. ON APRIL 18TH, 2025, MISS JONES CONTACTED ME, WHICH I INFORMED HER OF THE VIOLATIONS. AND IN PERSON. MEETING WAS SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 22ND, 2025 AT 5:15 P.M. HERE AT THE VILLAGE HALL. DURING THE MEETING, ATTENDED BY MISS JONES AND HER HUSBAND, MR. JONES, MY DIRECTOR, DEENA FREEMAN, AND I CAME TO AN AGREEMENT WAS REACHED TO GRANT A 90 DAY EXTENSION FOR COMPLIANCE DUE TO MISS JONES UPCOMING SURGERY ON APRIL 28TH, 2025. I'VE DELIVERED THE STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER TO MISS AND MRS. TO MISS AND MR. JONES FOR THEIR SIGNATURES FORMALIZING THE 90 DAY COMPLIANCE PERIOD BASED UPON
[00:05:06]
BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE, I REQUEST A RESPONDENTS COME TO COMPLY WITH THE STIPULATION AGREEMENT FOR THE 90 DAY EXTENSION AND IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THEN, BE REQUIRED TO PAY A FINE, A FINE AND AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION FOR EVERY DAY. THE VIOLATIONS CONTINUE. THEREAFTER, ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS AND THE AMOUNT OF $50 SHALL BE PAID BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE VILLAGE WITH THE FILING OF THE STIPULATION. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY, HAVE THEY ACTUALLY PAID THE COST OR. NO, NO, THEY HAVE NOT PAID THE COST YET. OKAY. YOU MAY HAVE TO CHASE THEM DOWN. TYPICALLY, WHAT OTHER JURISDICTIONS WILL DO IS ACTUALLY GET THEM TO WRITE THE CHECK OR SUBMIT IT PRIOR TO PRIOR TO BRINGING THE STIPULATION TO HEARING. THAT WAY THERE'S NO QUESTION, THERE'S NO ISSUE ABOUT IT. THE VILLAGE THEN HAS THE FUNDS. OKAY, OKAY. SO I'M GOING TO. LOOKING AT THEN THERE'S NO ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF MR. OR MRS. JONES, AS YOU WOULD EXPECT, BECAUSE IT'S A STIPULATION. I'M GOING TO ENTER INTO EVIDENCE THAT VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH SEVEN IN THIS CASE, AND LOOKING OVER THE STIPULATION AND AGREED ORDER, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND APPROVE IT SUBJECT TO A PAYMENT OF THE $50 IN COST. I'LL PUT THAT. I'LL JUST ENTER THAT RIGHT IN. SO IT CAME BEFORE ME TODAY.ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY REASON THAT THEY COULDN'T PAY THIS IN A TIMELY MANNER? NO. SO WE'RE ACTUALLY IN CONTACT BACK AND FORTH. I COULD ACTUALLY GIVE HER A CALL AFTER THIS. OKAY. SO IF I SAY BY THE END OF THE MONTH, BY MAY 31ST. OKAY.
OKAY. VERY GOOD. ALL RIGHT. TAKE CARE OF THAT ONE. ALL RIGHT. NEXT CASE NUMBER TWO ON THE DOCKET IS CASE NUMBER 25067 FOR THE PROPERTY OF 14 889 SOUTHWEST 1/73 DRIVE, INDIANTOWN. AND THE RESPONDENTS ARE JUAN GALLEGOS AND FRANCISCO SANCHEZ. AND OFFICER NARANJO.
THAT'S YOU WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. THIS IS CASE 2506 SEVEN. MY NAME IS JONATHAN NARANJO AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. I AM A CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY UPON MY DISCOVERY ON APRIL 10TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IS NOT PRESENT. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14 889 SOUTHWEST 1/73 DRIVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, AND A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO SOUTHWEST 1/73 AVE AND SOUTHWEST PALM BEACH STREET. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS JUAN FRANCISCO SANCHEZ. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY, A COPY OF THE PROPERTY.
APPRAISER'S RECORD OF OWNERSHIP IS MARKED, MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT ONE. ON APRIL 10TH, 2025. I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY. AT THAT TIME, I OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING CODE VIOLATIONS.
[00:10:06]
SECTION 33.1 PERMITTED USES. SECTION DOT 91 .33 ABANDONED SALVAGE OR JUNKED PROPERTY PROHIBITED ON PUBLIC WAYS. SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE. AT THAT TIME, I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS TWO, THREE, FOUR. AND FIVE. OKAY, BASED UPON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON APRIL 10TH, 2025 FOR THE HEARING OF MAY 20TH, 2025, WHICH IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT SIX. IN THE NOTICE, I CITED THE VILLAGE CODE VIOLATION CITED EARLIER IN MY TESTIMONY. IN THE NOTICE, THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN UNTIL APRIL 29TH, 2025 TO CORRECT THAT VIOLATIONS AND WAS INFORMED OF THE NEED TO CONTACT VILLAGE CODE INSPECTOR. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE RESPONDENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON APRIL 15TH, 2025, ALSO WITH TRACKING MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT SEVEN. AND EXHIBIT EIGHT. AND BY POSTING THE PROPERTY ALONG WITH POSTING AT THE VILLAGE HALL, THE RETURN.THE RETURN RECEIPT WAS RECEIVED ON MAY 8TH, 2025 AND IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT NINE. WAIT A MINUTE. I'M LOOKING AT THE FRONT PAGE OF AN ENVELOPE THAT SAYS RETURN TO SENDER, UNCLAIMED, UNABLE TO FORWARD. SO. IT WAS NOT RECEIVED. YEAH, IT WAS NOT RECEIVED. OKAY. SO THEN YOU POSTED THAT'S EXHIBIT TEN. SORRY. YES. YOUR TRAIN OF THOUGHT A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE OF THE POSTING. THE PROPERTY IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT TEN. MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT 11. A VOICE MESSAGE TO MY OFFICE LINE WAS RECEIVED FROM MISS SANCHEZ ON MAY 9TH, 2025. I DID RETURN MISS SANCHEZ CALL AFTER THE WEEKEND ON MAY 13TH, 2025. I GOT NO ANSWER. THAT'S WHEN I LEFT A VOICE MESSAGE ON MAY 14TH, 2025. I DID A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND I FIND NO NO CHANGE TO THE PROPERTY. ALSO ON MAY 16TH, 2025, I DID ANOTHER FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND I DID SEE PARTIAL COMPLIANCE. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY BOTH VISITS. AT THOSE TIMES. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS 12. 13. 14. I REQUEST THAT ALL THE VILLAGE EXHIBITS BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE I REQUEST, I RESPONDED, BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS OF THE VILLAGE CODE BY JUNE 17TH, 2025 AND IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THEN, BE REQUIRED TO PAY A FINE IN AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION FOR EVERY DAY. THE VIOLATIONS CONTINUE THEREAFTER DUE TO THE ONGOING VIOLATION PERSISTENT FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD. I WOULD RECOMMEND IMPOSING A DO NOT REPEAT ORDER. THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS AND AMOUNT OF $150 CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY. ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF JUAN GALLEGOS OR. SANCHEZ? FRANCISCO. SEEING NO ONE WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT. INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 14. IN THIS CASE, JUST NOTE TO TIDY UP. MAKE A NOTE. EXHIBIT 11 IS YOUR AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE.
BUT IT'S NOT SIGNED OR NOTARIZED. SO YOU'LL TAKE CARE OF THAT. YOUR TESTIMONY WAS THAT. THAT THAT YOU SENT IT BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON APRIL 14TH, 2025 AND THAT THAT WAS RETURNED ON MAY 8TH, UNSIGNED. SO AND THAT'S WHEN YOU POSTED AND I HAVE EVIDENCE OF POSTING AN EXHIBIT TEN. SO I YOU SAID DO NOT REPEAT. BUT IN FACT THIS IS A VIOLATION THAT REMAINS.
[00:15:11]
JONATHAN THE VIOLATION DOES REMAIN. RIGHT. SO THEY MOVE I SEE I SEE THAT THEY MOVED IT BEHIND THE YES HOUSE OR ON THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE. WHAT REMAINS IS THE CAR ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. IT'S NOW UNCOVERED A SILVER CAR, IS THAT IT? NO, THERE'S A BROWN TARP OVER IT.GOOD MORNING, MADAM MANAGER. I HAVE TESTIMONY. BUT YOU DO HAVE TESTIMONY. ALL RIGHT. I FIGURED I'D BETTER RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. SO HELP YOU GOD? YES, I DO, SO I HAD CONVERSATION. THIS IS A HABITAT FOR. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. KRISTA. THIS IS A HABITAT FOR HUMANITY HOME, AND I HAVE SPOKEN WITH MIKE REDLING FROM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. THEY HAVE TRIED ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS TO GET THIS INDIVIDUAL TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR RULES, AND IT'S BEEN A STRUGGLE. OKAY, SO FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH, IT'S JUST THEY'VE REALLY TRIED REALLY HARD. THIS IS ON THE ENTRANCE INTO CARTER PARK. YES, IT'S ON THE CORNER. OKAY. DO YOU WANT TO DO YOUR WELL. MR. NARANJO, LET ME LET ME LOOK AT EXHIBIT 14. WHAT IS THAT BEHIND THE. BEHIND THE ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE? IT LOOKS LIKE A MAYBE A TRAILER OF SOME SORT.
IT'S YOUR LAST EXHIBIT. YEAH. SO IS HE ON THE PROPERTY OR. NO. YEAH. SO EVERYTHING'S IN THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY NOW. THERE'S A DRIVEWAY ON THE SIDE RIGHT THERE. AND THAT'S WHERE THE TRAILER GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE BACK WITH THE. THEY PUT THE TWO ATVS THAT WERE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. THEY PUT THOSE BACK THERE. AND THEN THAT BIG SIDE BY SIDE IS ALSO IN THE BACK. ALL RIGHT. NOW WHERE THE. AND MAYBE I'M MISSING IT. LOOK AT 13. YEAH. SO I TOOK A PICTURE OF THAT BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THE SIDE THE SIDE BY SIDE WAS RIGHT THERE AT THE STOP SIGN OKAY. SO THEY DID MOVE IT. IS IT THE ONE THAT'S COVERED ON THE AT THE KIND OF THE BOTTOM RIGHT OF THAT PHOTOGRAPH. YEAH. THAT STILL STANDS. THAT STILL STANDS. BUT THE SIDE BY SIDE THAT'S IN THE BACK OF THE YOU SEE HOW RIGHT THERE IT'S AT THE STOP SIGN. YES. SO I JUST RETOOK THE PICTURE BECAUSE THEY DID MOVE IT. SO IT WAS LIKE A LIKE A COMPLIANCE PICTURE. OKAY. SO THE ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE. BUT THE ONE THAT'S ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY IS NOT. REPEAT THAT OKAY. SORRY. THE ALL TERRAIN VEHICLE IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE. CORRECT. THE ONLY ONE OUT OF COMPLIANCE IS THAT CAR. SO IT'S REALLY A VIOLATION OF. ITS 9133 91.33 ABANDONED JUNK PROPERTY PROHIBITED IN PUBLIC WAYS. CORRECT? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT'S THE VIOLATION.
IT'S 91. 33. ALL RIGHT. SO INSTEAD OF A DO NOT REPEAT I GUESS WE CAN DO A DO NOT REPEAT FOR THE OTHER ONE BECAUSE THEY JUST COMPLIED. RIGHT. YEAH. SO THEY JUST RECENTLY COMPLIED. BUT THEY REPEAT FOR THREE. 5.5. OKAY. OKAY. SO WITHOUT OBJECTION. AND SINCE NO ONE'S HERE ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERS, I'M GOING TO ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGES EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 14. IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT A VIOLATION
[00:20:02]
OF 91.33 PARKING AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BY AN ABANDONED VEHICLE STILL EXISTS ON THE PROPERTY. AND I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THAT AS TO THE ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE, IT SHOULD BE ORDERED NOT TO REPEAT THAT VIOLATION UNDER SECTION 3-5.5. AND THAT THE VIOLATION OF 9133 SHOULD BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE BY SORRY, SHOULD BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE BY. JUNE 17TH, 2025.FAILING WHICH, FINDING THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. OKAY.
AND THAT WILL TAKE CARE OF THAT. THREE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. CASE NUMBER THREE IS CASE OR ON THE DOCKET IS CASE NUMBER 25068 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 924 SOUTHWEST 170TH AVENUE INDIANTOWN. THE RESPONDENT IS BIBLE CHURCH OF GOD INC. THAT'S ALSO YOUR CASE WHENEVER YOU'RE READY TO GO.
CASE 2506 EIGHT BIBLE CHURCH OF GOD INC. MY NAME IS JONATHAN NARANJO AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. I AM A CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY UPON MY DISCOVERY ON APRIL 16TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IS NOT PRESENT.
THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14 924 SOUTHWEST 170 70TH AVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA.
ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS BIBLE CHURCH OF GOD INC. A COPY OF THE ZOMBIES AND THE PROPERTY APPRAISER. RECORDS OF OWNERSHIP IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE, TWO, AND THREE. OKAY. ON APRIL 16TH, 2025, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY. AT THAT TIME, I OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS. SECTION 33.1 PERMITTED USES. SECTION 67 .201 NUISANCE DECLARED WITH SUBSECTION 67.201 BE TRASH.
SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE. SECTION 91 .34 PERSONS IN CHARGE OF PROPERTY NOT PERMITTED.
SALVAGE OR JUNK PROPERTY TO REMAIN ON PREMISES. AT THAT TIME I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS FOR. FIVE. SIX.
SEVEN. BASED UPON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON APRIL 16TH, 2025 FOR THE HEARING OF MAY 20TH, 2025, WHICH IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT EIGHT. IN THE NOTICE, I CITED THE VILLAGE CODE VIOLATIONS CITED EARLIER IN MY TESTIMONY. IN THE NOTICE, THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN UNTIL MAY 20TH MAY 1ST, 2025 TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS AND WAS INFORMED OF THE NEED TO CONTACT THE VILLAGE CODE INSPECTOR. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE RESPONDENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON APRIL 16TH, 2025, ALSO WITH TRACKING AND PROOF OF SIGNATURE MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBITS NINE AND TEN. AND BY POSTING THE
[00:25:09]
PROPERTY ALONG WITH THE POSTING AT VILLAGE HALL. A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTING. A PHOTOGRAPH OF POSTING THE PROPERTY IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT 11. MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT 12. NO CALL, EMAIL OR LETTER FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER WAS RECEIVED ON MAY 12TH, 2025. I DID FOLLOW UP INSPECTIONS AND I FOUND NO CHANGE TO THE PROPERTY. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME AND THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS 13. 14. I REQUEST THAT ALL OF THIS, ALL OF THE VILLAGE EXHIBITS, BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE. BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE. I REQUEST A RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS OF THE VILLAGE CODE BY JUNE 17TH, 2025, IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THEN, BE REQUIRED TO PAY FINE IN AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION FOR EVERY DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUE THEREAFTER DUE TO THE ONGOING VIOLATION PERSISTING FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD PERIOD AND CAUSING SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I WOULD OPPOSE AND DO NOT REPEAT ORDER TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE. THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS AND AMOUNT OF $150 CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY, SO NO ONE'S HERE ON BEHALF OF THE BIBLE CHURCH OF GOD, INC. WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE IS EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 14. IN THIS CASE, LOOKING AT EXHIBIT 14, WHICH IS THE ONE THAT'S UP ON THE SCREEN.I DID THEY DID THEY MOVE ALL OF THIS TRASH AND, AND MATERIAL TO THE STREET FOR PICKUP? IS THAT SO ON THAT PROPERTY, PEOPLE LIVE IN THEIR CARS AND TRUCKS AND THAT'S JUST EVERY WEEK. EVERY WEEK THERE'S ALWAYS JUST DUMPING THERE OF, YOU KNOW, THE PEOPLE THAT ARE ACTUALLY JUST LIVING ON THAT VACANT LOT IN THEIR CARS AND TRUCKS. OKAY. SO. SO HOW DOES THAT GET CLEANED UP? IS THAT. RIGHT NOW WE'RE IN A WORKS WITH WASTE MANAGEMENT TO SEE IF TO GET IT PICKED UP. THERE'S A CLEANUP THIS WEEKEND BECAUSE IT'S IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. SO YEAH. SO THERE IS A THING WITH WASTE MANAGEMENT. IF IT'S ON A VACANT LOT, THEY DON'T PICK UP. OKAY. WELL. I ALSO HAVE MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE HERE. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AGAIN. AND YEAH, THIS ONE, ALL OF THEM SO FAR HAVE NOT BEEN SIGNED. YEAH. THIS ONE HERE ON MY COPY. WHERE ARE YOU. YOU DO HAVE. YEAH. IT DO YOU HAVE THEM FOR ALL OF THEM. YEAH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THEY JUST GET THAT GETS SUBSTITUTED. IN EVIDENCE. ALL RIGHT. I GUESS WHAT I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT. HAVE THEY COMPLIED WITH ANYTHING. NO, NO. CAUSE STEVE AND I, WE DID TRY CALLING PEOPLE FROM THE SOTHEBY'S REPORT. ALL RIGHT. SO I'M GOING TO SAY THIS IS NOT A DO NOT REPEAT ORDER. THIS IS A JUST A REGULAR VIOLATION ORDER. REGULAR VIOLATION. OKAY? I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY, THE VIOLATION ORDER SAYS NOT TO REPEAT IT AS WELL, BUT DO NOT REPEAT. YOU'LL USE WHEN THEY'VE COMPLIED IN BETWEEN THE TIME YOU SET FOR COMPLIANCE AND THE HEARING. OKAY. IT'S LIKE WHATEVER THAT IS A TWO WEEK PERIOD. YEAH. WHATEVER. IF THEY COMPLY THEY'RE THEN THEN THEY'RE ELIGIBLE FOR COSTS. THEY'RE ELIGIBLE FOR THIS DO NOT REPEAT ORDER WHICH SAYS YOU DIDN'T COMPLY IN THE TIME WE SET FOR YOUR COMPLIANCE. AND SO THEREFORE YOU DID ULTIMATELY COMPLY. BUT WE'RE CHARGING YOU THE COSTS. AND THE NEXT TIME YOU DO IT IT'S A REPEAT VIOLATION. SO BUT WITH A VIOLATION ORDER, THE NEXT TIME THEY DO IT IT'S A IT'S A IT'S A DO NOT OKAY OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT'S FINE. LET'S
[00:30:05]
SEE. SO. SO BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE I'M GOING TO FIND THAT VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED DO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. I'M GOING TO ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025, FAILING WHICH YOU'LL FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. IS THAT.OKAY? ALL RIGHT. NEXT CASE IS NUMBER FOUR ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 25069 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 627 SOUTHWEST 1/70 AVENUE INDIANTOWN. AND THE RESPONDENT IS CLAUDIUS TAYLOR JR AND OFFICER NARANJO. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. CASE NUMBER 2506 NINE. MY NAME IS JONATHAN NARANJO AND I'VE BEEN SWORN IN. I'M A CODE OF COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY UPON MY DISCOVERY ON APRIL 17TH, 2025.
THE RESPONDENT IS NOT PRESENT. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14 627 SOUTHWEST 1/70 AVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS TAYLOR CLAUDIUS JR. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S RECORD OF OWNERSHIP IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT ONE. ON APRIL 17TH, 2025, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY. AT THAT TIME, I OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS. SECTION 33.1 PERMITTED USES. SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE. SECTION 91 .34 PERSONS IN CHARGE OF PROPERTY NOT TO PERMIT SALVAGE OR JUNK PROPERTY REMAIN ON PREMISES. AT THAT TIME I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS TWO. THREE AND FOUR. BASED UPON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON APRIL 17TH, 2025 FOR THE HEARING OF MAY 20TH, 2025, WHICH IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT FIVE. IN THE NOTICE, I CITED THE VILLAGE CODE VIOLATIONS CITED EARLIER IN MY TESTIMONY. IN THE NOTICE, THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN UNTIL MAY 2ND, 2025 TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS AND WAS INFORMED OF THE NEED TO CONTACT VILLAGE CODE INSPECTOR. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE RESPONDENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON APRIL 17TH, 2025, ALSO WITH TRACKING AND PROOF OF SIGNATURE MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT SIX AND SEVEN. AND BY POSTING THE PROPERTY. ALONG WITH THE POSTING AT VILLAGE HALL. OKAY, YOU HAVE GOOD SERVICE THOUGH. EXHIBIT SEVEN IS A SIGNATURE. YES. THERE YOU GO. OKAY. GO AHEAD. EIGHT, EIGHT AND 9 OR 5. A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTING OF THE PROPERTY IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT EIGHT. MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT NINE. OKAY. AND YOU'VE GOT THE ACTUAL EXECUTED COPY OF THAT. CORRECT. OKAY, GOOD. STEVEN, DINA AND MYSELF HAVE SPOKEN TO MR. TAYLOR, WHO INFORMED US THAT HE WAS OBTAINING NO TRESPASSING SIGNS FROM THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND PLANNED TO REMOVE THE VEHICLE AND TRAILERS FROM THE VACANT LOTS. HOWEVER, DESPITE OUR EFFORTS TO WORK WITH HIM SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR, WE HAVE SEEN NO IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY HE OWNS. ON MAY 19TH, 2025, I DID A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND I FOUND NO CHANGE TO THE PROPERTY. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS TEN. OKAY, I REQUEST THAT ALL THE VILLAGE'S
[00:35:14]
EXHIBITS BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE. I REQUEST THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS OF THE VILLAGE CODE BY JUNE 17TH, 2025 AND IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THEN, BE REQUIRED TO PAY FINE IN AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION FOR EVERY DAY. THE VIOLATIONS CONTINUE THEREAFTER DUE TO ONGOING VIOLATIONS PERSISTING FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD. I WOULD I WOULD RECOMMEND IMPOSING A FINAL ORDER TO. THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND MR. TAYLOR IS NOT HERE LOOKING OUT, SEEING NO ONE. SO WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH TEN. IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE IN YOUR TESTIMONY, I'LL FIND THAT VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED DO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. IN ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. FAILING WHICH YOU FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY, WILL ACCRUE FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. AND. AND YOU SAY THIS IS, WELL, THAT'S BEEN GOING ON FOR A WHILE. YEAH, THAT'S, THAT'S BEEN GOING FOR A COUPLE YEARS NOW. OKAY. ALRIGHTY. ALL RIGHT. NUMBER FIVE ON THE DOCKET IS CASE NUMBER 25070 FOR THE PROPERTY OF 14 637 SOUTHWEST 170TH AVENUE. AGAIN, THIS IS RESPONDENT IS CLAUDIUS TAYLOR JR. AND OFFICER NARANJO. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. SO THIS IS CASE 2507 CLAUDIUS TAYLOR JR. THIS IS THE PROPERTY TO THE RIGHT OF THE PROPERTY. I JUST ANNOUNCED. OKAY. YEAH, I CAN SEE IT ON EXHIBIT TWO. YEP. MY NAME IS JONATHAN NARANJO AND I'VE BEEN SWORN IN. I'M A CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY UPON MY DISCOVERY ON APRIL 17TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IS NOT PRESENT. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14 637 SOUTHWEST 1/70 AVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. LET ME JUST STOP YOU. IS THAT IS THE NEXT CASE THE PROPERTY IN FRONT OF THAT? CORRECT? OKAY, WHICH IS STEVENS. SO LET'S. OH, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THE NEXT CASE WOULD BE THAT I CITED THAT FRONT LOT. THEN ALSO THERE WAS A LOT IN FRONT OF THAT ONE BUT WHICH HAS SINCE COMPLIED. SO THE NEXT CASE 2571 IS MINE FOR CLAUDIUS TAYLOR. OKAY. SO I CAN'T REALLY HEAR THEM TOGETHER. GO AHEAD CLEARLY. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1467 SOUTHWEST 1/70 AVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARTIN COUNTY, THE PROPERTY APPRAISER AND THE PROPERTY OWNER IS TAYLOR CLAUDIUS, JR. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY. APPRAISER'S RECORD OF OWNERSHIP IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE. ON APRIL 17TH, 2025, I INSPECTED A PROPERTY. AT THAT TIME, I OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING CODE VIOLATIONS.SECTION 31.1 PERMITTED USES. SECTION 35.5 OUTDOOR STORAGE. SECTION 91 .34 PERSON DISCHARGE OF PROPERTY NOT TO PERMIT SALVAGE OR JUNK PROPERTY TO REMAIN ON PREMISES. AT THAT TIME I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY. THE PHOTOGRAPH ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS TWO. THREE AND FOUR. BASED UPON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND A NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON APRIL 17TH, 2025 FOR THE HEARING OF MAY 20TH, 2025, WHICH IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT FIVE. IN THE NOTICE, I CITED THE VILLAGE CODE VIOLATIONS CITED EARLIER IN MY TESTIMONY IN THE IN THE NOTICE OF RESPONDENT WAS
[00:40:01]
GIVEN UNTIL MAY 2ND, 2025 TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS AND WAS INFORMED OF THE NEED TO CONTACT VILLAGE CODE INSPECTOR. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE RESPONDENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON APRIL 17TH, 2025, ALSO WITH TRACKING MARK BEFORE YOU AS A AS EXHIBIT SIX AND SEVEN AND BY POSTING THE PROPERTY ALONG WITH POSTINGS AT VILLAGE HALL, A RETURN RECEIPT WAS RECEIVED ON MAY 12TH, 2025 AND IS MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT EIGHT. NO. WELL, NO. AGAIN, THIS IS A RETURN THE RETURN RETURN TO SENDER. IT'S NOT. IT HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED. IT WAS RETURNED TO SENDER. NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED. UNABLE TO FORWARD. AND. SO I GUESS MR. TAYLOR DOES NOT LIVE AT HONEYCUTT AVENUE IN PORT SAINT LUCIE ANY LONGER, BUT. WELL, HE WE SENT THEM THREE TOTAL. HE I THINK HE GOT TOOK TWO OF THEM AND DIDN'T GET THE LAST ONE. OKAY. WELL MAYBE HE DOES, BUT YOU POSTED ANYWAY. GO AHEAD. IT'S THAT'S NOT ACTUALLY A RECEIPT. THIS IS GO AHEAD. YOU POSTED NINE AND TEN SO YOU'RE GOOD. MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE IS MARKED AS VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS TEN. AND AGAIN THAT ONE IS YOU HAVE THE YES EXECUTED ONE. CORRECT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND THE PHOTOGRAPH IS ON. STEVEN DEAN AND MYSELF HAVE SPOKEN TO MR. TAYLOR MULTIPLE TIMES ON APRIL 30TH, 2025 AND AGAIN ON MAY 9TH, 2025, MR. TAYLOR INFORMED US THAT HE WAS OBTAINING NO TRESPASSING SIGNS FROM THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND REMOVE VEHICLES AND TRAILERS FROM THE VACANT LOTS. HOWEVER, DESPITE OUR EFFORTS TO WORK WITH HIM SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR, WE HAVE SEEN NO IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTIES HE OWNS. ON MAY 19TH, 2025, I DID A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND FOUND NO CHANGE TO THE PROPERTY. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME. THE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY, ACCURATELY SHOW WHAT I SAW THEN AND ARE MARKED AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT 11. I REQUEST THAT ALL THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE. I REQUEST THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS OF THE VILLAGE CODE BY JUNE 17TH, 2025 AND, IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THEN, BE REQUIRED TO PAY A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION FOR EVERY DAY. THE VIOLATIONS CONTINUE THEREAFTER DUE TO ONGOING VIOLATIONS PERSISTING FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD. I WOULD RECOMMEND IMPOSING A FINAL ORDE. THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS AND THE AMOUNT OF $150 CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY. AND ONCE AGAIN, NOBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF CLAUDIUS TAYLOR JR, LOOKING OUT, SEEING NO ONE. WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH 11 IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY, I'LL FIND THAT VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED DO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. FAILING WHICH, FINDING THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. OKAY, NEXT ONE ALSO, MR. TAYLOR, THIS IS NUMBER SIX ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE 25071. IT'S FOR THE PROPERTY OF 14 636 SOUTHWEST 169TH DRIVE.RESPONDENT IS CLAUDIUS TAYLOR JR. AND OFFICER ALONSO YOU'RE GOING TO YOU'RE GOING TO TESTIFY. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. MY NAME IS STEVEN ALONSO RAMIREZ AND I AM A CO COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY FOLLOWING MY INSPECTION ON APRIL 17TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE IS MR. TAYLOR CLAUDIUS JR, WHO IS NOT PRESENT TODAY. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14636 SOUTHWEST 169TH DRIVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE MARIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERS, THE PROPERTY OWNER IS MR. TAYLOR CLAUDIUS, JR. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY, APPRAISER'S RECORDS CONFIRM CONFIRMING OWNER IS SUBMITTED BEFORE YOU AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS NUMBER ONE. DURING MY INSPECTION ON APRIL 17TH, 2025, I OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS OF THE VILLAGE CODE. SECTION 3-3.1. PERMITTED USES.
[00:45:03]
SECTION 91.32 ABANDONED SALVAGE OR JUNK PROPERTY PROHIBITED GENERALLY AND SECTIONS 67.201 NUISANCE DECLARED. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY DURING MY INSPECTION. THESE. THESE PHOTOGRAPHS ACCURATELY REPRESENT WHAT I OBSERVED AND ARE SUBMITTED BEFORE YOU AS VILLAGE EXHIBIT NUMBER TWO. BASED ON MY FINDINGS, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO MR. CLAUDIUS ON APRIL 18TH, 2025 FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED ON MAY 20TH, 2025. THIS IS SUBMITTED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT NUMBER THREE IN THE NOTICE. IN THE NOTICE, THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED CODE VIOLATIONS WERE CITED AND THE RESPONDENT WAS INSTRUCTED TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS BY MAY 1ST, 2025. HE WAS ALSO ADVISED TO CONTACT THE VILLAGE CODE ENFORCEMENT. ONCE THE VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, THIS NOTICE WAS SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL POSTED AT THE PROPERTY AND POSTED AT VILLAGE HALL. DOCUMENTATION OF THESE EFFORTS IS SUBMITTED AS FOLLOWS.CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT EXHIBITS NUMBER FOUR USPS TRACKING CONFIRMATION AS EXHIBIT NUMBER FIVE. DELIVERY SIGNATURE AS EXHIBIT NUMBER SIX. POSTING OF THE PROPERTY AS EXHIBITS NUMBER SEVEN, AND ALSO WITH MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AS EXHIBIT NUMBER EIGHT. I DID RECEIVE A PHONE CALL FROM MR. CLAUDIUS ON APRIL 30TH, 2025, WHERE HE STATED THAT HE WOULD BE IN TOWN TO POST NO TRESPASSING SIGNS AND REMOVE THE VEHICLES AND OTHER ITEMS FROM THE PROPERTY. I CONDUCTED A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION ON MAY 8TH, 2025 AND FOUND THAT THE VIOLATIONS STILL EXISTED AND TOOK ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHS AT THE TIME WHICH ACCURATELY DEPICT WHAT I OBSERVED. THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT NUMBER NINE. I REQUEST THAT ALL VILLAGE EXHIBITS, ONE THROUGH NINE, BE ACCEPTED INTO EVIDENCE, AND BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE PRESENTED, I REQUESTED THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITED VILLAGE CODE PROVISIONS. BY JUNE 17TH, 2025. THE PROPERTY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE. IF THE PROPERTY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THE DATE, I REQUESTED A FINE OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY, AND EVERY DAY AFTER BEING IMPOSED EVERY DAY, THE VIOLATION CONTINUES THEREAFTER. ADDITIONALLY, THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 FOR CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT ALL VILLAGE I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED FOR THIS COST AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY.
OKAY. AND ONCE AGAIN, MR. TAYLOR IS NOT HERE FOR THIS CASE. AND SO, WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH NINE. BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE IN YOUR TESTIMONY, I'LL FIND THE VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED DO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY AND ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. FAILING WHICH, A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. AND OKAY, MOVING ALONG, NUMBER SEVEN ON THE DOCKET IS CASE NUMBER 25074. IT'S THE PROPERTY AT 15 340 SOUTHWEST PALM DRIVE. AND THE RESPONDENT IS NAZMUL CHOWDHURY. AND MR. ALONZO. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY.
MY NAME IS STEVEN ALONZO RAMIREZ AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN, AND I AM A CO COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY FOLLOWING MY INSPECTION ON APRIL 17TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE IS MR. CHOWDHURY. NOT WHO IS NOT PRESENT TODAY. THIS CASE. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15340 SOUTHWEST PALM DRIVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE MARIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERS, THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY MR. CHHOTI NAZMUL. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY, APPRAISER'S RECORDS CONFIRMING OWNERSHIP IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBITS NUMBER ONE. ON APRIL 17TH, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND OBSERVED THE VIOLATIONS UNDER SECTIONS 67.201, NUISANCE DECLARED. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AT THE TIME AND THE PHOTOGRAPH ACCURATELY REPRESENT WHAT I OBSERVED. AND THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS. NUMBER TWO, BASED ON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON APRIL 17TH, 2025 FOR A HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MAY 20TH, 2025. THE NOTICE IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBITS NUMBER THREE. THE NOTICE CITED THE CODE VIOLATIONS MENTIONED IN MY TESTIMONY INFORMED THE RESPONDENT THAT THE VIOLATION MUST BE CORRECTED BY MAY 2ND, 2025. IT'S ALSO ADVISED
[00:50:03]
THAT THE RESPONDENT TO CONTACT THE VILLAGE CODE ENFORCEMENT. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AND POSTED AT VILLAGE HALL. THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS SUBMITTED AS FOLLOWS. CERTIFIED MAIL AS EXHIBITS NUMBER FOUR USPS TRACKING AS EXHIBITS NUMBER FIVE. DELIVERY SIGNATURE AS EXHIBITS NUMBER SIX. POSTING OF THE PROPERTY AS EXHIBITS NUMBER SEVEN AND AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AS EXHIBITS NUMBER EIGHT. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY CALLS, EMAILS, OR LETTERS FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER REGARDING THIS MATTER. ON MAY 5TH, I CONDUCTED A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND CONFIRMED THAT THE VIOLATIONS STILL EXIST ON THE PROPERTY, BUT AS OF THIS MORNING, MAY 20TH, 2025, I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AGAIN AND SAW THAT THEY HAVE COMPLIED OVER THE WEEKEND AND THE IMAGE ACCURATELY REFLECTS WHAT I'VE OBSERVED. THESE ARE MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBITS NUMBER NINE AND TEN. I REQUESTED THE VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH TEN BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY. EVIDENCE REPRESENTED. I REQUEST THAT THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO NOT REPEAT THE VIOLATION WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS. AND IF THE PROPERTY COMES OUT OF COMPLIANCE. I REQUESTED A FINE OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY. THAT THE VIOLATION CONTINUES THEREAFTER. ADDITIONALLY, THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COST IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 RELATED TO THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. AND THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY. AND MR. CHAUDRY IS NOT HERE ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF. NOBODY HERE. OKAY. SO, WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH TEN. IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THE MR. CHOWDHURY IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE. AS OF MAY 20TH, 2025. BUT I'M GOING TO ORDER HIM NOT TO REPEAT THE VIOLATION. AND I'M GOING TO ASSESS COST IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS HEARING. OKAY. LET'S SEE. AND.ALL RIGHT, NEXT CASE IS NUMBER EIGHT ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 25075 PROPERTY. IT'S 16160 SOUTHWEST MAPLE AVENUE. OWNER IS CRAIG D EDWARDS. AND EVA EDWARDS. MR. ALONZO, MY NAME IS STEVEN ALONZO RAMIREZ. AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN. I AM A CODE COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. IN THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY FOLLOWING MY INSPECTION ON APRIL 17TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE IS CRAIG D EDWARDS AND EVA J. EDWARDS WHO ARE NOT PRESENT TODAY. THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16160 SOUTHWEST MAPLE AVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA. ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARION COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERS, THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY ARE CRAIG D EDWARDS AND EVA J. EDWARDS. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OWNERSHIP RECORDS IS SUBMITTED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBITS NUMBER ONE. ON APRIL 17TH, 2025, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY, OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS. SECTION 67.201 NUISANCE DECLARED. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AT THE TIME, AND THE PHOTOS ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT I OBSERVED AND IS SUBMITTED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS. NUMBER TWO. BASED ON MY FINDINGS, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON APRIL 17TH, 2025 FOR A HEARING SCHEDULED ON MAY 20TH, 2025. THIS NOTICE IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBITS NUMBER THREE. THE NOTICE CITED THE VIOLATIONS MENTIONED IN MY TESTIMONY AND INFORMED THE RESPONDENTS THAT THEY HAD UNTIL MAY 2ND, 2025 TO CORRECT THE VIOLATION. IT ALSO, IT ALSO INSTRUCTED THEM TO CONTACT VILLAGE CODE ENFORCEMENT. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT CERTIFIED MAIL POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AND POSTED AT VILLAGE HALL. THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS IS SUBMITTED AS FOLLOWS. CERTIFIED MAIL AS EXHIBITS NUMBER FOUR USPS TRACKING AS EXHIBIT NUMBER FIVE. DELIVERY SIGNATURE AS EXHIBIT NUMBER SIX. PROPERTY POSTING AS EXHIBIT NUMBER SEVEN AND MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AS EXHIBIT NUMBER EIGHT. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY CALL, EMAIL, OR LETTER FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER REGARDING THIS MATTER. ON MAY 5TH, 2025, I CONDUCTED A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION. I CONFIRMED THE VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED.
I TOOK A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PROPERTY DURING THE INSPECTION AND THEY ACCURATELY REFLECT THE PROPERTY CONDITIONS AT THE TIME AND SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT NUMBER NINE. HOWEVER, THIS IS THE SECOND TIME I HAD SENT HIM A VIOLATION NOTICE REGARDING THE SAME VIOLATION. I'M REQUESTING A
[00:55:01]
DO NOT REPEAT ORDER BE IMPOSED ON THE PROPERTY. I REQUEST THAT VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH NINE BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE BASED ON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE PRESENTED. I REQUEST THAT THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED NOT TO REPEAT THE VIOLATION AND IF THE PROPERTY IS FOUND TO BE IN VIOLATION WITH THE SAME COURT IN THE FUTURE, I REQUEST THAT A FINE OF $100 PER DAY BE IMPOSED ON THE PROPERTY. THE VIOLATION CONTINUES THEREAFTER. ADDITIONALLY, THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF 150 FOR CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED AS COSTS AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING.THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY. LET'S SEE. YOU GAVE THEM UNTIL WHEN TO COMPLY. LET'S SEE.
AND. I GAVE HIM TILL MAY 2ND. OKAY. AND THEN YOU HAPPENED TO SEE IT ON THE EIGHTH THAT IT WAS IN COMPLIANCE. IS THAT THE POSTING DATE? IT WAS THE SAME DAY AS THE POSTING. YES. YEAH.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT'S THAT'S FINE. ALL RIGHT. ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF THE EDWARDS CRAIG OR EVA EDWARDS? SEEING NO ONE WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH NINE. IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY, I'LL FIND THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE TO FIND THAT THEY ARE NOW IN COMPLIANCE AND THAT THEY COMPLIED ON OR ABOUT MAY 8TH, 2025, AND ORDER THEM NOT TO REPEAT THE VIOLATION THAT EXISTS ON THEIR PROPERTY, AND FURTHER, TO AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE.
AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS HEARING. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NUMBER NINE ON THE DOCKET IS CASE NUMBER 25076 FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 735 SOUTHWEST 171ST AVENUE. AND LET'S SEE, THE OWNER IS JAMES TAYLOR. AND OFFICER LONZO. THAT'S YOUR CASE AS WELL. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. MY NAME IS STEVEN RAMIREZ AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN I AM A CO COMPLIANCE INSPECTOR WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN. THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY FOLLOWING MY INSPECTION ON APRIL 17TH, 2025. THE RESPONDENT IN THIS CASE IS JAMES MELINDA TAYLOR WHO IS NOT PRESENT TODAY.
THIS CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14735 SOUTHWEST 171ST AVE, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA.
ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE MARIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERS, THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY JAMES MELINDA TAYLOR. A COPY OF THE PROPERTY, APPRAISER'S RECORDS CONFIRMING OWNERSHIP IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBITS NUMBER ON. ON APRIL 17TH, 2025. I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS. SECTION 67.201 NUISANCE DECLARED. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AT THE TIME. THE PHOTOGRAPH ACTUALLY REPRESENT WHAT I OBSERVED AND THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS VILLAGE EXHIBITS. NUMBER TWO. BASED ON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON APRIL 17TH, 2025 FOR A HEARING SCHEDULED ON MAY 20TH, 2025. THE NOTICE IS SUBMITTED AS EXHIBIT NUMBER THREE. THE NOTICE CITED THE CODE VIOLATIONS MENTIONED IN MY TESTIMONY, INFORMED THE RESPONDENT THAT THE VIOLATION MUST BE CORRECTED BY MAY 2ND, 2025. IT ALSO ADVISED THE RESPONDENT TO CONTACT THE VILLAGE CODE ENFORCEMENT. UPON DOING SO, THE NOTICE WAS SENT CERTIFIED MAIL POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AND POSTED AT VILLAGE HALL AND THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. DOCUMENTATION IS SUBMITTED AS FOLLOWS. CERTIFIED MAIL AS EXHIBITS NUMBER FOUR USPS TRACKING AS EXHIBIT NUMBER FIVE. DELIVERY SIGNATURE AS EXHIBIT NUMBER SIX WITH POSTING OF THE PROPERTY AS EXHIBIT NUMBER SEVEN AND MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AS EXHIBIT NUMBER EIGHT. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY CALLS, EMAILS, OR LETTERS FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER REGARDING THIS MATTER. ON MAY 5TH, 2025, I CONDUCTED A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION AND CONFIRMED THE VIOLATION STILL EXISTS ON THE PROPERTY.
THE LOT HAD BEEN PARTIALLY CUT, BUT THE REAR PORTION REMAINS OVERGROWN WITH TALL WEEDS. I PHOTOGRAPHED THE PROPERTY AGAIN AND THE IMAGE ACCURATELY REFLECTS WHAT I OBSERVED. AND THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS EXHIBITS NUMBER NINE. I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH NINE BE RECEIVED INTO EVIDENCE, AND BASED ON MY TESTIMONY AND THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, I REQUESTED RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS BY JUNE 17TH, 2025. AND IF THE PROPERTY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THAT DATE, I REQUEST THAT A FINE OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY THE VIOLATION CONTINUES THEREAFTER.
[01:00:04]
ADDITIONALLY, THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 RELATED TO THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF TODAY'S HEARING. THIS CONCLUDES MY TESTIMONY. OKAY. ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF JAMES MELINDA TAYLOR? SEEING NO ONE WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT ANY EVIDENCE. THE VILLAGE EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH NINE IN THIS CASE. BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY, I'LL FIND THAT VIOLATION. THIS CHARGE DOES EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. IN ORDER.COMPLIANCE OWNER BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025. FAILING WHICH YOU'LL FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 17TH, 2025, AND LET'S SEE. THAT THE CASE THAT'S LISTED NUMBER TEN, THAT WAS THE CASE THAT WE DEALT WITH LAST MONTH, AND I'VE NOW SIGNED THAT. THAT'S AGREED ORDER SO THAT THAT ONE IS TAKEN CARE OF. AGREED ORDER IS SIGNED. AND THAT WAS I SIGNED EARLIER TODAY ACTUALLY. IT'S 520. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE THE LAST ONE. WHAT HAVE WE GOT LEFT? OKAY. WE DO HAVE SOME CASES THAT WERE COMPLIED. THAT'S GOOD. AND THEN WE'VE GOT I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S ANOTHER STIPULATION REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLIANCE BY THE CHURCH OF GOD BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THIS IS CASE NUMBER 25028, WHICH WE'VE HEARD ON ON THE LAST MONTH OR THE MONTH BEFORE. AND SO ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF THE CHURCH, OR ARE YOU GOING TO MAKE THE PRESENTATION, OFFICER ALONZO. SO I'LL MAKE THE PRESENTATION. SO THIS CASE WAS BROUGHT BACK IN FEBRUARY, FEBRUARY, AND IT WAS ISSUED A FINAL ORDER. THE RESPONDENT DID COME IN A COUPLE WEEKS LATER WITH THE FINAL ORDER IN HAND THAT SHE DID RECEIVE IN THE MAIL, AND SHE EXPRESSED THAT SHE WAS OUT OF THE COUNTRY FOR A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME. SHE DOES AGREE THAT THE VIOLATIONS DO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY, AND SHE JUST ASKED THAT SHE NEEDED MORE TIME TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE, WHICH IS WHERE WE CAME WITH THE STIPULATION REQUESTING A TIME EXTENSION.
OKAY. AND OBVIOUSLY YOU AGREE TO THE EXTENSION OF THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE. YES. IT WAS BASED ON HER ABSENCE. IT WAS BASED ON HER ABSENCE NOT BEING HERE. OKAY. AND I'M GOING TO ACTUALLY I'M GOING TO ADD THAT TO THE DOCKET UNDER THE SPECIALLY SET CASES WHERE THERE'S A BLANK. OKAY. SO FOR THE SAKE OF THE CLERK, YOU MAY WANT TO YOU MAY WANT TO KNOW IT'S CASE NUMBER 25028 CHURCH OF GOD BOARD OF TRUSTEES. AND I'M GOING TO YOU'LL SEE ON PAGE SEVEN AT THE TOP THAT THAT'S WHERE I'M GOING TO ADD THIS CASE. ALL RIGHT. AND LET'S SEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES. AND THAT'S A.
SUSPENSION. REQUESTING EXTENSION. SO.
OKAY. AND THERE'S NO NEW EVIDENCE JUST YOUR TESTIMONY. OKAY. YES. JUST MY TESTIMONY.
AND NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT. HARD TO MAKE THAT OUT. IS IT RUTH? YES. LOOKS LIKE RUTH. I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO PRONOUNCE HER LAST NAME. OKAY, BUT IS OBVIOUSLY WITH THE CHURCH. SO SHE'S THE ONE IN CHARGE OF THE PROPERTY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, SO LOOKING AT THE STIPULATION, IT
[01:05:02]
DID NOT REQUIRE ATTENDANCE. THEY DID NOT BRING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE OR BEFORE MARCH 17TH AS ORDERED. THE RESPONDENT STATES THAT CHURCH MEMBERS WERE OUT OF THE COUNTRY ON A MISSION TRIP, NOT AWARE OF THE TIME SET FOR THE ORDER. OKAY, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE TO EXTEND THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE. AND LET'S SEE. WHO AGREED TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE MAY 20TH. THAT'S TODAY. THAT'S TODAY. NO. WHETHER THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE. SO I AM ACTUALLY GOING TO GO REINSPECT THE PROPERTY LATER TODAY AFTER THIS HEARING. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. I'M GOING TO FIND IT. IT'S APPROPRIATE TO EXTEND THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE UNTIL TODAY. AND NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT BOTH PARTIES HAVE SIGNED, OFFICER ALONSO, YOU'VE SIGNED ON BEHALF OF THE VILLAGE. THIS MATTER CAME BEFORE ME TODAY, MAY 20TH. 2025.AND. THEN I'M GOING TO SAY THAT IT WAS FURNISHED BY HAND DELIVERY.
TO YOU ALL. I'M JUST GOING TO LEAVE THIS WITH YOU. OKAY? FORGET WHAT THE VIOLATIONS WERE. BUT AND YOU'VE GOT THAT STATED OBVIOUSLY IN THE FINAL ORDER. DO YOU REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD WHAT THEY WERE. I'M PULLING IT UP RIGHT NOW OKAY. YEAH. WE JUST DESCRIBED THAT THEY'RE MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER.
SO THE VIOLATIONS WERE FOR SECTION 91.32. ABANDONED SALVAGE OR JUNK PROPERTY PROHIBITED GENERALLY. OKAY. AND ALSO. SECTION 35.8 STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES RVS AND BOATS. AND THAT WAS IT. OKAY, SO IT WAS A VEHICLE ISSUE. ALL RIGHT. AND LET'S GO BACK TO THIS ONE OTHER CASE. OKAY I THINK ANYTHING ELSE TO COME BEFORE US TODAY? I'M NOT AWARE OF ANYTHING. NOPE. OKAY. AND THE NEXT HEARING IS WHAT IS THE NEXT HEARING? MADAM CLERK JUNE 17TH JUNE 17TH. OKAY. WE WILL SEE YOU ALL THEN. HOPEFULLY HAVE A GOOD MONTH. WE STAND ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.