[CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:05] GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. I LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. IF I CAN GET A ROLL CALL, PLEASE. CHAIR MILEY HERE. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS HERE. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON HERE. BOARD MEMBER. WOOD. PRESENT. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. HERE. LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT. BOARD MEMBER. DE MARCELLUS IS NOT PRESENT. AND BEFORE I DO THE REQUEST, THE INVOCATION, I WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME MISS TERESA THOMPSON TO THE BOARD. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING? MISS THOMPSON? NOT AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. AND IF WE COULD HAVE INVOCATION FIRST. THAT'S GREAT. OUR FATHER, GOD IN HEAVEN, WE COME NOW AT THE CLOSE OF ANOTHER DAY AND THANKING YOU, HEAVENLY FATHER, FOR ALLOWING US TO BE IN THIS DAY. CONTINUE TO GO WITH US AND STAND BY US AND LEAD US FROM ONE SPIRITUAL DEGREE OF GRACE UNTO ANOTHER. WE ASK YOU THIS EVENING FOR THE EFFICACIOUS GRACE IN THE NAME OF JESUS. WE PRAY THAT THE WORDS OF OUR MOUTH AND THE MEDITATION OF OUR HEARTS BE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SIGHT. OH LORD, OUR STRENGTH AND OUR REDEEMER. IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS, WE PRAY. AMEN. AMEN. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. SO MOVED. IS THERE A [APPROVAL OF AGENDA ] SECOND? I SECOND. OKAY. MOTION WAS APPROVED BY BOARD MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY BOARD MEMBER WOODY. CHAIR. MILEY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WOODY. PRESENT. YES. OH. BOARD AND BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. YES. YEAH. WE'RE HERE. [APPROVAL OF MINUTES] OKAY. NEXT WOULD BE THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM OUR LAST MEETING. THERE. THERE'S NO MINUTES. CHAIR. BECAUSE THE MEETINGS WERE SO CLOSE, WE DIDN'T GET THEM BACK IN TIME. SO WE WILL HAVE THOSE MINUTES AT THE NEXT MEETING. SO WE'LL HAVE MINUTES FOR THE PREVIOUS [1.  Proposed 2025 PZAB Meeting Dates ] MEETING. IN THIS MEETING? YES. OKAY. ON TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. MR. DO YOU WANT TO I CAN YOU CAN DO IT FOR LIKE FOR THE DATE. YEAH. NO. AT THE LAST PCAB MEETING, THERE WAS A PROPOSAL FOR 2025 MEETING DATES. THE DISCUSSION WAS TO BRING THOSE DATES BACK. ONCE EVERYBODY CHECKED THEIR CALENDAR. IF THERE WAS DATES THAT DID NOT WORK FOR YOU, YOU WOULD MAKE THAT DECISION FOR US TO ESTABLISH A MEETING SCHEDULE FOR NEXT YEAR. SO WAS EVERYONE ABLE TO CHECK THEIR SCHEDULES TO SEE IF ANYTHING COINCIDED WITH THE DATES THAT THEY PROPOSED? THE ONLY TWO WE WERE REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT WAS JANUARY 2ND. THE DAY AFTER A HOLIDAY AND JULY THIRD. JULY 3RD. THE DAY BEFORE A HOLIDAY. I DIDN'T SAY WE WING IT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. OKAY. I DON'T HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE DATES. OKAY. SHOULD I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ACCEPT THIS SCHEDULE AND MOVE FORWARD? I SECOND. OKAY. THE MOTION WAS MADE BY BOARD MEMBER WATSON. PROPERLY. SECOND BY BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. ROLL CALL. CHAIR. MILEY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WOODY. PRESENT. YES. YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. YES. MOTION PASSES. NEXT ITEM. DINA. YEAH. THE NEXT ITEM. JUST BEFORE WE ANNOUNCE THAT DINA FREEMAN WITH THE COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, WE ALSO HAVE CHLOE ONLINE REPRESENTING OUR LEGAL, OUR VILLAGE ATTORNEY. SO I JUST WANTED TO RECOGNIZE THAT. AND THAT SHE'S HERE FOR ANY, ANY REQUIREMENTS LEGALLY. SO APPRECIATE YOU BEING THERE, [2.  PLT-24-054 River Oak Fernwood Holdings, LLC (Plat) Request for a recommendation of plat approval from the Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board concerning real property totaling 55.1907-acres, located on the east side of S.W. Famel Boulevard, west of Fernwood Forrest Road, and north of the St. Lucie Canal.  ] CHLOE. AND SO WE HAVE THE PLT 20 405 FOR RIVER OAK FERNWOOD HOLDINGS LLC PLAT. I'M GOING TO COME AND STAND UP AT THE PODIUM, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER TO SEE THE SCREEN AND JUST DO A BRIEF [00:05:05] PRESENTATION. AND BEFORE WE BEGIN THIS APPLICATION IS QUASI JUDICIAL IN NATURE, WHICH REQUIRES THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND MUST FOLLOW BASIC STANDARDS OF NOTICE AND DUE PROCESS. AND THE COUNCIL'S DECISION MUST BE MADE BASED ON COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. THANK YOU. CHLOE. THAT'S WHY WE'RE VERY GRATEFUL THAT YOU'RE HERE. SO THIS IS A RIVER OAK PLAT APPLICATION. SO NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. THE RIVER OAK FERNWOOD HOLDINGS LLC IS SEEKING A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD FOR THE RIVER OAK PLAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 SEVEN, PLATTING AND RIGHT OF WAY. AND THIS IS AN APPLICATION NUMBER PLT 24 054. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND JUST TO REMIND EVERYBODY AND OBVIOUSLY WE'VE GOT NEW NEW PEOPLE ON THE PCB. THE AREA IN YELLOW IS THE LOCATION IN RELATION TO THE OVERALL VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN PROPERTY BOUNDARY. AND THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS A ZOOMED IN VERSION. AND THERE'S THE ACTUAL LOCATION OFF OF SOUTHWEST FENMORE BOULEVARD AND WEST OF FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD AND NORTH OF SAINT LUCIE CANAL AND SOUTH OF THE SOUTHWEST MARKET STREET. AND IT'S A 55.1900 ACRES, AND IT'S AN APPROVED SITE PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED AS A MAJOR SITE PLAN. AND THERE'S BEEN A COUPLE OF MINOR REVISIONS TO THAT. AND THE AREA IN YELLOW SHOWS THE OVERALL SITE, AND IT'S BEEN APPROVED AS A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. AND OBVIOUSLY, IN ORDER TO MOVE FORWARD, ONE OF THE OPTIONS, IF YOU LOOK TO SELL IT AT ANY POINT IS TO GET PLAT APPLICATION APPROVED. SO THAT'S WHERE WE'RE HERE TODAY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND JUST TO REMIND EVERYBODY THAT THERE'S A FUTURE LAND USE OF SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. THAT'S SHOWN WITH THE AREA IN ORANGE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND IT'S GOT A LIMITED RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AS WELL. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THERE'S THE APPROVED RIVER OAKS SITE PLAN. IT'S JUST GONE THROUGH A SECOND REVISION JUST TO MODIFY A FEW SITE LOT LAYOUTS AND SOME TERMINOLOGY, BUT NOT AN OVERALL INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF UNITS. IT'S 131 UNITS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED. AND RECENTLY RECORDED SECOND AMENDMENT HAS JUST BEEN RECORDED TODAY ACTUALLY FOR THE SITE PLAN. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS JUST THE DETAILS. THE SURVEYOR IS IN THE AUDIENCE, MR. LINDLEY AS WELL, WHO PRODUCED THE PLAT AND THE SURVEY. AND SO THIS IS JUST SOME OF THE INFORMATION THAT THIS IS THE PLAT THAT WAS PROVIDED AND MEETS ALL OF THE FLORIDA STATE STATUTES AND ALL THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIREMENTS. WE WORK VERY CLOSELY WITH MR. LINDLEY. SO IT'S ONLY OUR SECOND PLAT THAT I BELIEVE WE'VE DONE IN INDIAN TOWN. SO WE'RE STILL HAVE THE TRAINING WHEELS ON. SO HE WAS VERY HELPFUL IN MAKING SURE THAT WE DID MAKE SURE THAT IT MET ALL OF THE STATE STATUTES. SO THE NEXT FEW SLIDES, I THINK, SHOW THAT THE DETAILS OF THE PLAT. SO OBVIOUSLY IT'S SHOWING ALL OF THE BOUNDARIES AND ALL OF THE INFORMATION METES AND BOUNDS. AND THERE YOU GO. AND THIS WAS ALL INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA ONLINE. WE JUST WANTED TO SHOW YOU THE SITE PLAN VERSUS PLAT. SO WE ALL ARE ON THE SAME PAGE WITH WHAT YOU'RE HERE TO APPROVE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THE PLAT CRITERIA REVIEW CRITERIA FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WAS APPLIED, AS WERE THE NOTICING ADVERTISING AND STAFF REPORT. THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE PACKET AND WENT INTO MORE DETAIL. SO THE APPROVAL CRITERIA IS 12 DASH SEVEN. AND THEN IN PARENTHESES SIX. AND BASICALLY THE STAFF HAVE REVIEWED. AND SO AS LEGAL AND OUR VILLAGE ENGINEER AND THEIR SURVEYING DIVISION OF KIMLEY-HORN REVIEWED THIS AHEAD OF IT BEING BROUGHT TO YOU TODAY, JUST TO MAKE SURE CONFIDENTLY SURVEYOR TO SURVEYOR THAT YOU KNOW, EVERYTHING MET THE REQUIREMENTS. SO THERE'S A CRITERIA THAT WAS FOUND TO BE ACCEPTABLE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THE PLAT RECOMMENDATIONS. THE PLAT APPLICATION HAS BEEN CORRECTLY ADVERTISED AND NOTICED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN CODE PROVISIONS. IT SATISFIES THE CRITERIA YOU JUST TALKED ABOUT IN 12 SEVEN AND VILLAGE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL TO THE PCB OF THE APPLICATION. PLT DASH 24 054 FOR THE RIVER OAK PLAT. SO IT'S FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION FOR A RECOMMENDATION BEFORE IT MOVES FORWARD TO THE FINAL ACTION OF ONE PUBLIC HEARING AND READING BEFORE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. SO THAT'S THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. I JUST A COMMENT THAT I THINK YOU ALL HAVE DONE A BEAUTIFUL JOB WITH THIS ENTIRE PROJECT. I KNOW YOU GUYS WENT THROUGH A LOT OF PUSH UPS AND ACTUALLY REDUCED THE NUMBER OF UNITS AND SO ON AND SO FORTH, AND I THINK YOU'VE DONE A FABULOUS JOB. MISS MCBRIDE. I DO, CHLOE. DO YOU HAVE THE QUASI JUDICIAL JUDICIAL SCRIPT? OH, YEAH. CAN WE GO THROUGH THAT TO [00:10:02] MAKE SURE THAT. WE PROPERLY HEAR THIS ITEM? YEAH. DOES ANY COUNCIL MEMBER HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT WOULD PREVENT THEM FROM VOTING ON THIS ITEM? NO. NO. OKAY. AND DOES ANY COUNCIL MEMBER HAVE ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION TO DISCLOSE? NO. OKAY. AND IF THERE'S ANY INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING INTERVENORS STAFF WITNESSES, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO PLAN TO SPEAK OR OFFER OTHER TESTIMONY DURING THIS HEARING, PLEASE RISE AND BE SWORN BY THE VILLAGE CLERK. DO YOU, DO YOU. I'M SORRY. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? I DO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY. SO WE CAN MOVE ON NO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WAS THAT ON? THAT'S ALL I HAD. YEAH. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. ONE WOULD BE IN REGARDS TO PLATTING AND COMPLIANCE. AND BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT I REVIEWED, IT WASN'T CLEAR. SO I WANTED TO KNOW IF THERE WERE ANY SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES. DURING THE REVIEW PROCESS FOR THE PLATTING THAT LIKE, WERE THERE ANY SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES THAT WOULD BRING THIS BEFORE US AGAIN? WELL, IT'S ACTUALLY NOT BEEN THE PLAT ITSELF HASN'T BEEN BROUGHT BEFORE YOU BEFORE. THE SITE PLAN WAS BROUGHT BEFORE YOU WHEN IT WAS A MAJOR SITE PLAN. AND THEN THEY HAD A COUPLE OF REVISIONS THAT FELL UNDER THE MINOR, THE AMENDMENT AND MINOR AMENDMENTS TO A MAJOR SITE PLAN. SO THEY WERE AT STAFF LEVEL, AND IT WAS PURELY SOME LOT CHANGES, JUST IN TERMS OF A FEW LOT LINES AND SOME NUMBERING. THE APPLICANTS HERE, IF WE WANT ANY MORE ON THAT. BUT IT WAS VERY MINOR THINGS THAT WENT THROUGH REVIEW WITH THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COLLEAGUES AND IT MET THAT THRESHOLD IN TERMS OF THE CRITERIA AND THE THRESHOLDS THAT IT COULD BE DEALT WITH AT THE STAFF LEVEL THAT WERE VERY MINOR CHANGES. WE DIDN'T BRING THOSE BEFORE YOU BECAUSE TONIGHT IS ABOUT THE PLAT AND THE PLAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LATEST VERSION OF FINAL SITE PLAN THAT'S BEEN APPROVED AND FINAL ACTION COULDN'T BE MADE ON THE PLAT BEFORE THE FINAL SITE PLAN. YOU KNOW, WHATEVER IS IN FOR AMENDMENT THAT'S BEEN APPROVED, IT WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD TO VILLAGE COUNCIL WITH THE PLAT UNTIL THAT FINAL SITE PLAN WAS RECORDED, WHICH IT HAS BEEN. BUT FOR THE PURPOSES FOR TODAY, IT'S PURELY AROUND THE PLAT, NOT THE FINAL SITE PLAN. SO IN LOOKING AT THE CONDITIONS THAT WERE PROVIDED, CAN YOU EXPLAIN OR CLARIFY THE FIRST ONE WHEN IT SAYS ACCEPTABLE 100% SECURITY? WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT? SO IF THE DEVELOPMENT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED IN TERMS OF THE OVERALL INFRASTRUCTURE, THERE IS A BOND THAT'S REQUIRED AND A COST ESTIMATE FOR CONSTRUCTION THAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE SO THAT THEY DON'T. IF THE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE TO WALK AWAY, THEY'VE GOT A SURETY THAT THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS GOING TO BE COMPLETED AHEAD OF THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS TO GO VERTICAL WITH THE HOUSES. SO IT'S A STANDARD PRACTICE AND PROCESS. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE FLORIDA STATE STATUTES THAT WE REQUIRE. THEY EITHER BUILD ALL OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE OR THEY PROVIDE A SURETY WITH A BANK, A LETTER FROM A BANK, BASICALLY. SO THAT'S THAT'S THE SHORT VERSION. OKAY. I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTION. YOU'RE WELCOME. WOULD YOU ENTERTAIN A MOTION? BEFORE I ENTERTAIN A MOTION, ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? OH. THAT'S GOOD. NO, MA'AM. OKAY. SO, YEAH, I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I WOULD MOVE THAT. MOVE FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. I SECOND. ROLL CALL. OKAY. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY BOARD MEMBER WATSON. PROPERLY. SECOND BY BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. CHAIR. MILEY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WOODY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. YES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THAT'S BEEN. SO, ARE WE GOING TO DO YOU INTRODUCE IT AS [3.  Application No. ANX 24-045 Request for approval of annexing by voluntary petition certain real property totaling 0.19-acres in size, south of SW Citrus Boulevard, north of SW Kanner Highway, and contiguous to the existing boundaries of the Village of Indiantown. ] [4.  Application No. CPA-24-046 Request for approval of a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment concerning real property totaling 0.19+/-acres in size, located south of SW Citrus Boulevard and north of SW Kanner Highway, from Martin County Rural Density land use designation to Village Commercial Waterfront for Joseph W. Walsh & Indiantown Property Holdings, LLC. ] [5.  Application No. RZ-24-047  Request to Rezone real property totaling 0.19+/-acres in size, south of SW Citrus Boulevard, north of SW Kanner Highway, from A-2 Agricultural zoning district to the Canal Mixed Use zoning district for Joseph W. Walsh & Indiantown Property Holdings, LLC. ] ITEM NUMBER THREE? DO YOU READ THE TITLE OR DO YOU WANT ME TO DO THAT? SO OUR NEXT ITEM IS APPLICATION NUMBER A AND X 24 045. THANK YOU. SO THIS IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL. OH. MAY I CUT IN I APOLOGIZE. YES. SORRY. CHLOE. THIS ITEM IN THE REMAINING TWO ITEMS CONCERN THE SAME PIECE OF PROPERTY, AND THEY'RE ALL INTERRELATED. SO WE COULD HAVE ONE STAFF PRESENTATION IF THAT WOULD MAKE IT EASIER FOR ALL THREE. AND THEN JUST HAVE THREE SEPARATE [00:15:02] VOTES AND THREE SEPARATE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS BEFORE THE VOTE. AND THEN FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT, ALL THREE OF THESE REMAINING ITEMS ARE QUASI JUDICIAL. AND SO THE SAME PROCEDURES WILL APPLY. AND THE COUNCIL'S DECISION MUST BE BASED ON COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. SO ONE PRESENTATION. YES. AND WE'LL JUST CHANGE THE TITLE BECAUSE ULTIMATELY IT'S THE SAME PROPERTY. YEAH. GOOD IDEA. OKAY. AND DOES ANY COUNCIL MEMBER HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT WOULD PREVENT THEM FROM VOTING ON ANY OF THESE THREE ITEMS? NO, NO. OKAY. ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION TO DISCLOSE? NO. NO. OKAY. AND IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO HASN'T ALREADY BEEN SWORN THAT WOULD LIKE TO TESTIFY? IT NEEDS TO BE SWORN IN. PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? I DO. THANK YOU. AND YOU CAN PROCEED WITH YOUR PRESENTATION. THANK YOU. SO THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS APPLICATION NUMBER. AND DASH 24 045. AND THIS IS A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF ANNEXING BY VOLUNTARY PETITION FOR PROPERTY TOTALING 0.19 ACRES. AND THIS IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD, WEST OF FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD AND NORTH OF SAINT LUCIE CANAL. SO THERE'S THE REQUEST. IN SUMMARY, IT'S 0.9 ACRES. AND JUST TO SUMMARIZE IN GENERAL FOR THE OVERALL THREE APPLICATIONS THAT WE ALREADY HAD APPROVAL THROUGH PCB AND THEN ON TO VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR A LARGER AREA OF PROPERTY. BUT WHEN IT CAME TO RECORDATION AND REVIEW, THERE WAS A 0.19 ACRES THAT WAS MISSING FROM THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. AND SO WE'RE REALLY HERE TO FIX WHAT YOU COULD ARGUE IS, IS A MINOR DISCREPANCY OR A GLITCH, WHICH IS WHY WE'RE COMBINING THE THREE APPLICATIONS, BECAUSE IT'S A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. WE'VE ALREADY APPROVED THE WALSH ANNEXATIONS ON A LARGE SCALE ANNEX A LARGE SCALE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT, ANNEXATION, AND A REZONING. SO NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. AND THIS IS A PROPERTY LOCATION. AND THE AREA DEPICTED IN RED IS THE 0.19 ACRES THAT WAS MISSING FROM THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. AND SO WE'RE WANTING TO RECTIFY THAT AHEAD OF IT BEING ACCEPTED BY THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS A ZOOMED IN VERSION OF THAT. BASICALLY THAT SHOWS THE AREA DEPICTED IN RED AND LITERALLY TO THE EAST IS THE AREA IN BLUE WHICH HAS ALREADY BEEN ANNEXED IN AND THEN TO THE WEST. AND THE AND THE AREA THAT'S HATCHED IS THE ACTUAL WAS THE EXTENT OF THE BOUNDARY FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN BEFORE THE WALSH PROPERTY WAS EXPANDED? NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS AGAIN ZOOMED IN ON THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES WITH EITHER SIDE OF THIS LITTLE RED SQUARE IS NOW WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS SHOWS JUST A DESCRIPTION OF THE SURROUNDING USES AND GIVES YOU AN INDICATION OF THE EXISTING INDIAN TOWN. MARINE CENTER IS TO THE WEST. YOU'VE GOT TO THE NORTH. YOU'VE ALSO GOT THE MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL AND YOU'VE OBVIOUSLY SURROUNDED BY SOUTHWEST CITRUS AND SOUTHWEST KANNER HIGHWAY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THERE'S THE AREA IN BLUE. EITHER SIDE OF THE SMALL WHITE SQUARE THAT SHOWS THE COMMERCIAL WATERFRONT FUTURE LAND USE. SO THIS WOULD ALSO GET THAT SAME BLUE COLOR ON THE MAP IF IT'S RECOMMENDATION TONIGHT. AND THEN GOING TO VILLAGE COUNCIL. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS THE PROPOSED LAND USE. IT JUST SHOWS THE AREA THAT WAS IN WHITE COLORED IN BLUE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THE EXISTING ZONING WITH THE CANAL MIXED USE WITH THE AREA. THAT'S THE TINY SQUARE THAT'S JUST BASICALLY RIGHT NOW NEEDS TO BE AMENDED. WITH THE ZONING AND THE LAND USE AND THE ANNEXATION TO ACCOMMODATE THE WATERFRONT COMMERCIAL CANAL, MIXED USE AND BE PART OF THE VILLAGE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THERE WE SHOW THE PROPOSED ZONING WAS JUST DISCUSSED. CANAL MIXED USE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. AND THIS IS THE ANNEXATION REVIEW AND ANALYSIS. SO THE SAME ANALYSIS WAS STILL DONE EVEN THOUGH IT'S 0.19 ACRES. WE WENT THROUGH THE CORRECT PROCEDURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND ALSO STATE STATUTES TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S BEEN CORRECTLY NOTICED. AND A SIGNS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AND PEOPLE WITHIN 300FT HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED IN WRITTEN NOTICE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. SO THE ANNEXATION RECOMMENDATIONS IS BASICALLY A RECOMMENDATION BY THE PCB AS THE LPA. AND THEN IT'S GOING TO BE CONSIDERED BEFORE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL IS TWO SEPARATE PUBLIC READINGS. TO ADD TO THAT, THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT IS A SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. SO UNLIKE THE LARGER EXTENT OF THE WALSH PROPERTY, IT WILL NOT NEED TO GO THROUGH THE [00:20:01] 30 DAY CONSULTATION PROCESS BECAUSE IT'S SUCH A SMALL PIECE OF LAND, BUT IT WILL STILL GO THROUGH. WE WILL NOTIFY MARTIN COUNTY VIA A LETTER THAT WILL BE SENT AS REGISTERED MAIL AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE SECOND VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING, OR HEARING. AND SO WE WILL BE PROCESSING THROUGH TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL AFTER TONIGHT WITH YOUR RECOMMENDATION, THE ANNEXATION FOR 0.19. THE SMALL SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE REZONING CONCURRENT AS THREE SEPARATE APPLICATIONS, BECAUSE THAT'S HOW IT'S REQUIRED TO BE DONE. SO THE ANNEXATION, THE RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF IS THAT IT MEETS ALL THE CRITERIA. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN APPROVED, EITHER SIDE WITH THE EXISTING MARINE CENTER AND A RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THE PCB KNOW THAT STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL. AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE HERE TO BASICALLY HAVE YOU CONSIDER ALL THREE OF THOSE SEPARATE APPLICATIONS. SO THAT'S REALLY THE END OF STAFF PRESENTATION. I'M OPEN TO QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE ITEM RIGHT. NO DISCUSSION. NO. ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? NO. MADAM CHAIR, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I WILL MOVE THAT. MOVE FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. RECOMMENDATION? EXCUSE ME A SECOND. FOR THE ANNEXATION. FOR ANNEXATION? YEAH. MOTION FOR THE ANNEXATION HAS BEEN MOTIONED BY BOARD MEMBER WATSON PROPERLY. SECOND BY BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. ROLL CALL WILL BE CHAIR MILEY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WOODY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. YES. THE SECOND WOULD BE THE A MOTION FOR THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE MOVE FOR STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL ON THE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. I SECOND. ROLL CALL. OKAY. CHAIR. MILEY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WOODY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. YES. AND THE THIRD IS THE APPLICATION FOR THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY. I WILL MOVE THAT WE, FOR STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING. SECOND. ROLL CALL. SORRY. CHAIR. MILEY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WOODY. YES. BOARD MEMBER. THOMPSON. YES. MOTION PASSES. ALL THREE. GOT IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, EVERYBODY. APPRECIATE YOU SHOWING UP ON A SPECIAL MEETING OUTSIDE OF THE NORMAL SCHEDULED MEETINGS. YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME. AND WE'RE NOT DOING A DEVELOPMENT MANAGER DIRECTOR'S REPORT BECAUSE WE JUST DID IT. WE HAVE A FEW MORE APPLICATIONS IN, BUT IT WON'T BE THAT EXCITING. WE'LL SAVE THAT FOR THE NEXT ONE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOM. ANYTHING ELSE FROM ANYBODY ON THE COUNCIL? ON THE BOARD. NO. ALL RIGHT. SO MEETING WOULD BE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING. THANK YOU. THANKS * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.