Jul 16, 2024 Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:07]

WELCOME. I LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. I'D LIKE TO START OFF BY DOING A ROLL CALL.

VICE CHAIR MILEY HERE. BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER HERE. BOARD MEMBER. ANSAGER HERE. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON HERE. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS HERE. INVOCATION BY MR. WILLIAMS. LET US STAND, PLEASE. FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, FATHER GOD IN HEAVEN, WE COME NOW AT THE CLOSE OF ANOTHER DAY. AND THANK YOU, HEAVENLY FATHER, FOR ALLOWING US TO BE IN THIS DAY.

THIS IS A DAY THAT YOU HAVE MADE. WE'RE GOING TO REJOICE AND BE GLAD IN IT. THAT'S HOW WE'RE GOING OUT AND BLESS OUR COMING IN, BLESS THIS MEETING. BLESS IT IN A WAY, IN WHICH YOU WOULD HAVE IT TO GO, AND THAT THE WORDS OF MY MOUTH AND THE MEDITATION OF OUR HEARTS BE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SIGHT. OH LORD, OUR STRENGTH AND OUR ROCK. IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS, WE PRAY. AMEN, AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU. MOVING ON, I NEED AN APPROVAL FOR THE AGENDA. SO MOVED.

[APPROVAL OF AGENDA ]

OKAY. BOARD MEMBER ANSAGER. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS HERE. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. VICE CHAIR. MILEY. YES OKAY. ME? YES. I'M SO SORRY. IT'S OKAY. BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER. YES OKAY. AND

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

[2.  

Election of Chair

ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? NAY MADAM CHAIR, CONGRATULATIONS. I WOULD SUGGEST, BECAUSE YOU DO NOT NOW HAVE A VICE CHAIR. NEED TO VERY QUICKLY HAVE AN ELECTION FOR VICE CHAIR. I ACTUALLY HAVE A QUESTION FOR THAT PLEASE. SO BEFORE WE. SO WOULD WE WAIT UNTIL OUR NEW, I'LL POSE THAT QUESTION AT A LATER TIME. OKAY. YEAH. YOU COULD. THERE'S NO NECESSITY THAT YOU FILL THE POSITION OF VICE CHAIR RIGHT NOW, THE PRIMARY ROLE OF A VICE CHAIR IS TO FILL IN THE EVENT OF A CHAIR. WE HAVE A CHAIR HERE, SO YOU COULD WAIT TILL THE NEXT MEETING IF YOU WANTED TO WAIT FOR YOUR ADDITIONAL MEMBERS TO JOIN, TO DO THAT, IT'S NOT INCUMBENT UPON YOU ALL TONIGHT TO FILL THE VICE CHAIR. SO THAT WAS GOING TO BE A QUESTION. YEAH. IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO

[00:05:02]

[3.  

Application No’s: V-24-036; V-24-037; V24-038; V-24-039; V-24-040; and V-24-041: Order granting Variance approval for six (6) variances for a proposed commercial development comprising a Dollar Tree convenience store, located on the south side of SW Warfield Boulevard.

PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. IS THAT THE APPLICANT? IF THE APPLICANT COULD JUST FOR THE RECORD, THANK YOU SO MUCH. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? YES. ALL PRESENT AND ACCOUNTED FOR. I DO VERY GOOD. IT'S A GOOD TEST OF THE MIX, TOO. YES FANTASTIC, JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THE RECORD, MADAM CLERK, HAS THIS ITEM BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED? YES, THIS ITEM HAS BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED IN. THE DOCUMENT SHOWS THAT IT'S VERY GOOD, MEMBERS, GOOD EVENING, AT THIS TIME, I WOULD ASK IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PCB HAS A, CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONCERNING THESE VARIANCES THAT ARE BEFORE YOU.

I'D ASK YOU TO DISCLOSE THEM. NOW SEEING NONE, IN ADDITION, IF THERE IF ANY BOARD MEMBERS HAD ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH, THE APPLICANT OR ANYONE ELSE CONCERNING THESE VARIANCES, I WOULD ASK IF YOU COULD PLEASE DISCLOSE THEM FOR THE RECORD. NOW, SEEING NONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND PROCEED ON. AND, MADAM CHAIR, WITH YOUR LEAVE, I'LL GO AHEAD AND TURN IT OVER TO, DEANNA FRIEDMAN. FRIEDMAN, WITH, VILLAGE STAFF TO PRESENT, STAFF'S PRESENTATION ON THE ITE.

YES, SIR. OH AND BEFORE WE PROCEED, WE. ADINA, GIVE ME JUST ONE SECOND TO TELL THEM HOW WE'RE DEALING WITH THE MIX. SO WE'RE STILL STRUGGLING, WITH WITH AN ISSUE RIGHT NOW WHERE FOLKS ON ZOOM ARE HEARING, FEEDBACK OF THEIR OWN VOICE WHEN THEY ARE SPEAKING. UNTIL WE HAVE THAT COMPLETELY SORTED OUT, THE INTERIM WAY TO MAKE IT WORK IS WE WOULD ASK THAT ANYBODY IN THE ROOM WITH THE MIC TURN THE MICS OFF, WHILE THEY'RE SPEAKING. AND THEN WHEN IT'S TIME, WHEN YOU'VE GOT A QUESTION, YOU NEED TO SPEAK, JUST TURN IT ON TO ASK IT AND THEN TURN IT BACK OFF. THAT SEEMS TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. IT'S NOT A GREAT SOLUTION, BUT FOR THE TIME BEING, THAT'S, WHAT WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND DO. SO DEANNA, WITH THAT, PLEASE GO AHEAD AND PROCEED. YEAH. GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY. APOLOGIES THAT I'M NOT THERE IN PERSON. I'VE HAD SOME FAMILY EMERGENCIES IN THE UK, I'LL BE BACK LATER ON THIS WEEK. SO ORDINARILY I DO NOT MISS THESE MEETINGS IN PERSON. BUT FOR TO THIS EVENING. IN ORDER TO MOVE FORWARD, I'M PRESENTING REMOTELY FROM ENGLAND, BUT OBVIOUSLY I'VE PREPARED ALL OF THE REPORTS AND INFORMATION AHEAD, THE REASON FOR THE MEETING TODAY IS WE'VE TRIED TO DO A COUPLE OF MEETINGS, AND WE'VE NOT BEEN

[00:10:06]

OBVIOUSLY THERE WAS AN APPLICATION PACKET. THERE WAS A STAFF REPORT, AND THERE WAS, SUPPORTING INFORMATION OR PROVIDED IN THE AGENDA. SO THIS PRESENTATION IS MEANT AS AN ACTUAL, BRIEF SUMMARY. ALL OF THE ANALYSIS AND THE STAFF REPORT AND INCLUDING APPLICANT INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AHEAD OF THIS EVENING. SO THIS IS A BRIEF PRESENTATION FOR THE FARMER. AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED VARIANCE APPLICATIONS, THESE WERE THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED, JUST DETAILED IN THE WHEN THE CHAIR V 20 4-0 36 AND ALL OF THE OTHER NUMBERS, FOR A VARIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12 DASH 12 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE PROPERTY LOCATION, IS LOCATED OFF OF, SOUTHWEST WARFIELD BOULEVARD, WE HAVE, CLOSER ZOOMED IN INFORMATION HERE WITH THE AREA DEPICTED IN RED. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S IN RELATION TO SOUTHWEST WARFIELD BOULEVARD AND SOUTHWEST FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD.

YOU HAVE A MCDONALD'S IN PROXIMITY TO A SHELL STATION, I'M SORRY. AND ALSO A CHURCH AND SOME INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY FURTHER SOUTH. AND THIS IS A VACANT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. THE FUTURE LAND USE ON THE PROPERTY IS VILLAGE CORE MIXED USE, WHICH OE PROPOSAL ALSO HAS BEEN TRIGGERED BY A TREE ON A VACANT 3.0 ACRE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, THE VARIANCES ARE REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THE DETAILED DESIGN AND REVIEW OF THE PROJECT. THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A CONCURRENT VARIANCE APPLICATION, BECAUSE THERE WERE SIX AREAS OF THE CODE WITHIN, SPECIFICALLY IN THE LDR SECTION THREE, WHERE THERE WERE VARIOUS COMPONENTS WHEN THEY WERE DOING THE DESIGN AND THE ENGINEERING AND THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS THAT THEY REQUESTED, A VARIANCE. SO STAFF ACCEPTED THAT APPLICATION, DEEMED IT COMPLETE, TRANSMITTED, REVIEWED. AND WE'RE HERE TONIGHT TO BASICALLY AS A RESULT OF STAFF REVIEW AND REQUEST FROM THE PLANNING ZONING APPEALS BOARD AS THE FINAL DECISION MAKING ON THIS IN RELATION TO 3 TO 6 OF THE VARIANCES. AND I'M JUST GOING TO MOVE ONE SECOND.

SORRY, TECHNICAL ISSUE, SO THE VARIANCES ARE LISTED IN THE TABLE, AND THAT WERE INCLUDED IN THE STAFF REPORT. THERE IS ONE OF THE VARIANCES IS WHERE A MAXIMUM FRONT SETBACK WITHIN A VILLAGE, MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICT IS 35FT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 68.8FT, THE FRONT BEING THE FRONTAGE FROM SOUTHWEST WARFIELD. BUT THE AND WE'LL SHOW YOU, THE LAYOUT, THE SITE PLAN LAYOUT. BUT ONE OF THE COMPLICATIONS IS THAT THIS IS THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING IS NOT ACTUALLY FRONTING WARFIELD. SO, JUST TO ADD A LITTLE BIT OF CONTEXT TO IT, WE'LL SHOW YOU A SITE PLAN IN A MOMENT. BUT THAT'S ONE OF THE VARIANCE REQUESTS. THE SECOND IS WHERE PARKING MUST BE LOCATED TO THE SIDES OR REAR OF THE BUILDING. IN THIS CASE THE PARKING IS LOCATED WITH SOME OF IT FRONTING WARFIELD. AND THEN THE THIRD REQUEST IS WHERE, OBVIOUSLY, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT DOING THE FRONT, THE BUILDING FRONTING WITHIN THE MINIMUM MAXIMUMS, FRONTING WARFIELD. IT'S DIFFICULT FOR THEM TO ACHIEVE, BUILT FACADE ELEMENTS WITHIN 60 TO 80% OF THE BUILDING FRONTAGE MUST BE WITHIN THE REQUIRED MAXIMUM FRONT SETBACK. WELL, THEY'RE EXCEEDING THAT. SO BY DEFAULT THEY THEY CANNOT MEET THAT THIRD ELEMENT. THE THIRD REQUIREMENT FOR A VARIANCE, THE FOURTH REQUIREMENT IS A MINIMUM DEPTH REQUIREMENT OF EIGHT FEET OF CANOPIES OVER SIDEWALKS. AND AGAIN, BY THE NATURE OF THE DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF THE SITE, THAT THAT WOULD BE CANOPIES THAT ARE ACCOMMODATING IN NO CONTEXT TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE FIFTH ELEMENT IS WHERE THE MAXIMUM OF 20% OF ROOF ALLOWED TO BE VISIBLE. FLAT ROOF, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 100% FLAT ROOF PROPOSED WITH SOME SHIELDING FROM SOUTHWEST WARFIELD. AND THEY'VE ALSO I'LL LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK ARCHITECTURALLY, BUT THEY HAVE PROVIDED SOME BREAK BREAKING UP OF THE OVERALL, BUILDING PLANE IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE A LESS INTRUSIVE DESIGN IN RELATION TO WARFIELD. AND THEN THE SIXTH ELEMENT IS, CIVIC SPACE HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED WHERE THERE IS SOME CODE PROVISION THAT REQUESTS THAT, THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. I WANTED TO PROVIDE THIS, AND THIS WAS INCLUDED IN THE PACKET JUST TO SHOW YOU THE ACTUAL PROPOSED DOLLAR TREE AND THE FRONTAGE BEING THE MAIN FRONTAGE BEING HERE RATHER THAN OFF OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD. AND IT DOES SHOW THE OVERALL LAYOUT WITH

[00:15:01]

MARK SORRY I COULDN'T SEE YOU ON MY SCREEN. SO THE REQUEST IS OBVIOUSLY NOW FOR THE PCB TO, IF THE APPLICANT HAS ANYTHING TO ADD OR THE PCB HAS ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GRANITA HI, I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT A STATEMENT. I GUESS THIS IS A QUESTION FOR STAFF. THE FIRST QUESTION I HAVE, SEVERAL PLACES WHEN THE STAFF RESPONDS TO THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE, THE STATEMENT IS THAT THE IDEA, YOU KNOW, THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT WILL NOT BE CHANGED. THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT WILL NOT BE CHANGED. WELL, ISN'T THE VERY POINT OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT RULES TO CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT? I MEAN, HOW ELSE DO YOU, IF YOU ALLOW ONE PROPERTY AND HOW DO YOU EVER IMPROVE THE PROPERTY NEXT TO IT IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HOLD THEM TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD? I CAN RESPOND TO THAT.

DENA FREEMAN, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. SORRY. CAN YOU CLOSE YOUR MICROPHONE OFF, PLEASE? RENITA HAVE WE GOT THAT? THANK YOU, SO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION DOES INCLUDE CODE WITHIN THE SECTION THREE OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WITH ALL OF THE DESIGN SETBACKS, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. BUT ARTICLE 12, SORRY. SECTION 12 ALSO PROVIDES THE PROVISION FOR A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM THOSE CODES. STAFF HAVE REVIEWED THIS AND OBVIOUSLY HAVE ALSO TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THE RECENTLY APPROVED VILLAGE MARKET, VARIANCES THAT WERE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PCB LATE LAST YEAR, WE ALSO LOOKED AT THE

[00:20:09]

THAT'S VERY ANTIQUATED STYLE AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE WANT TO BRING OUR VILLAGE INTO THE FUTURE, AND THE FUTURE IS HAVING PLENTY OF PARKING AND LIGHTING IN THE FRONTS OF THE BUILDINGS WHERE YOU CAN NOT HAVE TO GO AROUND AND ACCESS FROM A REAR AREA OR PARK YOUR CARS IN A REAR AREA. SO I THINK WE SHOULD LOOK INTO POSSIBLY GETTING, A VOTE ON CHANGING THOSE REGULATIONS SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO DO THIS EVERY TIME. AND WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE THESE FOLKS DO A VARIANCE.

WE SHOULD MAKE IT SENSIBLE FROM THE ONSET AND THAT'S MY OPINION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER. YES. I'M NOT ARGUING AGAINST OR FOR THE VARIANCE, MY POINT WAS JUST, YOU KNOW, IT JUST SEEMED TO ME THAT'S THE WAY I THINK OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS IS TO IMPROVE THE CHARACTER, SO SAYING IT'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE THE CHARACTER, IT JUST SEEMS A CONFLICT TO ME. I DO HAVE A SECOND QUESTION ABOUT WHY IT'S IMPORTANT TO ALIGN THE DRIVEWAYS. THE DRIVEWAY WITH THE SHELL STATION. WHY? WHY IS THAT DESIRABLE? YES, MA'AM. THIS IS CHARLES PATTERSON. I'M THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE, DRIVEWAYS NEED TO LINE UP TO PREVENT, CONFLICTING LEFT HAND TURNING MOVEMENTS, WHICH BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES. SIR, I'M SO

[00:25:03]

AND I WOULD POINT OUT AND THIS WAS IN THE STAFF REPORT, JUST THAT THIS IS, AN ODD SHAPED PARCEL IN THE SENSE THAT IT'S GOT A SHARP ANGLE COMING IN ON THE ONE SIDE, WHICH AND AGAIN, THIS IS JUST NOTING WHAT'S ALREADY IN THE STAFF REPORT HER. YOU DO HAVE THIS THIS SHARP ANGLE THAT REALLY CUTS OFF THE APPLICABILITY OR THE ABILITY OF A BUILDING TO BE UP CLOSER TO THE STREET, COUPLED WITH AS THE ENGINEER INDICATED TO YOU, THE ENGINEERING SAFETY PREFERABILITY OF HAVING THOSE ROADS ALIGNED, THEY COMBINED TO SET UP TO A SITUATION WHERE IT WOULD BE

[00:30:06]

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I MOVE FOR STAFF APPROVAL OF THE OF THE. I WILL MOVE FOR STAFF APPROVAL OF ALL. WAS IT 6 OR 7 VARIANCES? SIX VARIANCES? I SECOND THAT MOTION. DO WE NEED TO HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? POSSIBLY. OR THERE'S NOBODY HERE. OKAY YEAH I WOULD GO AHEAD AND JUST ASK IF THERE'S ANY. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS. NO MA'AM. WOULD YOU LIKE TO CAN YOU DO A ROLL CALL PLEASE? BOARD MEMBER ANSAGER.

YES. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. YES. BOARD MEMBER. WATSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER. PRESSLER. YES. CHAIR.

MILEY YES. ONTO THE NEXT AGENDA. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR. AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF

[4.  

AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 3-5.7 “TEMPORARY USES AND SPECIAL EVENTS” OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; CREATING SECTION 3-5.10 “SPECIAL EVENTS”, OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE REVIEW AND ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS BY THE VILLAGE MANAGER; PROVIDING FOR REGULATION OF SPECIAL EVENTS; PROVIDING FOR APPEAL PROCEDURES; PROVIDING DUTIES OF PERMITTEES; PROVIDING FOR REGULATION OF PUBLIC CONDUCT DURING SPECIAL EVENTS; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS, CODIFICATION, CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

PROVIDING FOR REGULATION OF SPECIAL EVENTS. PROVIDING FOR APPEAL PROCEDURES, PROVIDING DUTIES OF PERMITTEES, PROVIDING FOR REGULATION OF PUBLIC CONDUCT DURING SPECIAL EVENTS. PROVIDING DEFINITIONS AND PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS. CODIFICATION CONFLICT, SEVERE SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM CHAIR. YOU SAVED MY VOICE A LITTLE BIT FROM HAVING TO READ ALL THAT. I'LL BE PRESENTING THIS ITEM, TO THE PCB. AS YOU MAY KNOW, THE VILLAGE COUNCIL HAS TAKEN A LOOK BACK AT, MATTERS IN THE VILLAGE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CONCERNING, REGULATION OF SPECIAL EVENTS. AND THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF DISCUSSIONS AT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL LEVEL CONCERNING MAKING SOME CHANGES TO THAT, AND AFTER NUMEROUS DISCUSSIONS WITH THEM AND MULTIPLE DRAFTS OF A POTENTIAL ORDINANCE GOING BEFORE THEM, JUST TO KIND OF WORK OUT THE BASICS, WE'RE NOW AT THE STEPS WHERE WE'RE BRINGING IT THROUGH THE APPROVAL PROCESS. ONE OF THE FIRST STEPS IN THAT PROCESS IS BRINGING THE ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU, THE PCB, THE PRIMARY REVISIONS THAT YOU FIND IN THIS ORDINANCE TO THE SPECIAL EVENT PROCESS, IS AS FOLLOWS, AND I WILL DO MY BEST NOT TO READ YOU THE ENTIRE AGENDA SUMMARY HERE, BUT I JUST WANT TO HIT A COUPLE POINTS. FIRST OFF, WE BREAK OUT SPECIAL EVENTS INTO THEIR OWN ORDINANCE SECTION. IT HAD BEEN GROUPED TOGETHER, WITH A PROVISION RELATING TO TEMPORARY USES, WHICH SOME SENSE MAKES A LITTLE BIT OF SENSE. BUT WHEN YOU'RE GETTING A LITTLE BIT MORE SPECIFICITY, WE THOUGHT IT'D BE BETTER TO BREAK IT OUT. SO THIS BROKE OUT INTO ITS OWN SECTION 3-5. TEN, THE ORDINANCE, THE DRAFT ORDINANCES BEFORE YOU, VESTS ALL AUTHORITY TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMITS IN THE VILLAGE MANAGER. ORIGINALLY, UNDER THE CURRENT ORDINANCE, THERE ARE CERTAIN INSTANCES WHERE SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS HAVE TO GO BEFORE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, AFTER LOOKING THAT THOUGHT IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO GO OVER THE REGULATIONS AGAIN, GET THEM NAILED DOWN, AND THEN MAKE IT A STAFF FUNCTION SO THAT IT IS, FOR STAFF. IF AN APPLICANT MEETS THE CRITERIA, THEY GET THE PERMIT. IF THEY DON'T MEET THE CRITERIA, THEY DON'T GET THE PERMIT AND PROCEED ON, IN ADDITION, THE, APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SPECIAL EVENTS PERMITS IN THIS DRAFT ORDINANCE ARE REDUCED FROM 60 DAYS BEFORE THE EVENT TO 30 DAYS BEFORE THE EVENT. THERE HAVE BEEN SOME CONCERNS RAISED THAT 60 DAYS WAS A LITTLE TOO FAR OUT, FOR PEOPLE PLANNING AHEAD. AND SO ON. I WILL NOTE, LET'S NOTE A LITTLE BIT FURTHER DOWN HERE, I THINK. BUT IN AMONGST THE CHANGES HERE, THERE IS ACTUALLY AN EXPRESS OPPORTUNITY TO APPLY, EVEN EARLIER THAN THAT, 60 OR 30 DAYS. IF SOMEONE WANTED TO APPLY, EVEN UP TO 365 DAYS BEFORE THEY CAN. SO THAT IF, FOR EXAMPLE, AN ORGANIZATION HAS MULTIPLE EVENTS DURING A YEAR, THEY KNOW THEY'RE DOING THAT SAME EVENT EVERY YEAR, THEY CAN COME ON IN VERY EARLY, GET IT ALL SORTED OUT VERY EARLY, AND THEN NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT

[00:35:04]

GENERALLY NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. THAT'S THE KEY ELEMENT. OKAY IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S PRIVATE, IT'S ONLY FOLKS, YOU KNOW THAT YOU'VE INVITED OR WHAT HAVE YOU. IT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. WHEN IT COMES TO A SPECIAL EVENT. IT'S BASICALLY EVENTS THAT ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE CERTAIN OTHER ONES, EVENTS OR ACTIVITIES, EVEN IF OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, THAT ARE HELD INDOORS OR WITHIN THE LICENSED PREMISES OF A RESTAURANT OR BAR, CONSISTENT WITH MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY AND FIRE SAFETY LIMITATIONS. THAT'S AN EXCLUSION AS WELL. THE IDEA BEING, IF YOU'VE GOT A FACILITY THAT IS AND YOU'VE GOT SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO BE GOING ON INDOORS RIGHT THEN, SO LONG AS THEY'RE COMPLYING WITH, MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY FIRE SAFETY REGULATIONS, AND SO ON, THAT'S NOT A MATTER OF THE VILLAGE NEEDS TO BE GETTING INTO WHAT WE'RE BASICALLY TALKING ABOUT HERE IN, IN KIND OF TAKING OUT THAT EXCLUSION IS EVENTS GOING ON AT PLACES THAT REALLY AREN'T SET UP DAY TO DAY FOR IT. OFTEN OUTDOORS. OKAY. EXCLUDING ALSO EVENTS OR ACTIVITIES, EVEN IF OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, HELD SOLELY ON THE PROPERTY OF A CHURCH, CIVIC ORGANIZATION OR SCHOOL. SO AGAIN, WHEN WE'RE IN AN INSTANCE HERE WHERE YOU'RE JUST ON THEIR PROPERTY, THE VILLAGE ISN'T GOING TO GET INTO THE MINUTIA OF THIS, THAT OR THE OTHER THING.

WHAT ARE THEY DOING THERE? ALL RIGHT, AN EXCLUSION THAT WE HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTING IN PRACTICE.

BUT WE NEVER HAD WRITTEN DOWN IN THE CODE EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES THAT ARE AUTHORIZED BY MARTIN COUNTY TO BE HELD AT TIME OR POWERS PARK. AS WE ALL KNOW, TIGER POWERS PARK IS A COUNTY PARK. THEY CONTROL WHAT EVENTS ARE APPROVED THERE AND SO ON, AND WE HAVE JUST DE FACTO TREATED IT AS ANYTHING GOING ON AT TIME OF POWERS PARK. IF THE COUNTY SAID IT WAS COOL, THEY DON'T NEED TO ALSO GO THROUGH THE VILLAGE. WE'RE JUST PUTTING THAT IN WRITING NOW AND THEN FINALLY A RENTAL VILLAGE INDOOR FACILITIES, RENTAL OF VILLAGE PAVILIONS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES FOR WHICH VILLAGE OTHERWISE HAS ISSUED A PERMIT. SO THAT'S NOT SAYING YOU CAN JUST DO THAT WITHOUT ANYTHING. YOU JUST HAVE TO GO TO THE VILLAGE THROUGH THE FACILITY RENTAL PROCESS OR WHAT HAVE YOU. SO THIS IS MEANT TO TAKE A LOT OF THINGS THAT WOULD BE A CONCERN FOR FOLKS JUST KIND OF OFF THE TABLE. YOU DON'T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT COMING IN FOR A PERMIT AND SO ON. BUT OF COURSE THERE ARE ACTIVITIES THAT OCCUR, ON A REGULAR BASIS WITHIN THE VILLAGE THAT WOULD FALL WITHIN THE EVEN NARROWER DEFINITION OF SPECIAL EVENT. NOW GOING ON. SO THAT'S THE REGULATIONS WOULD BE HAVING HERE. SO, SO IN THIS REVISED ORDINANCE, WE HAVE, A THRESHOLD, A DEFINITION FOR WHAT WE CALL A MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT. 250 OR MORE ATTENDEES RELATED TO THAT. THAT TRIGGERS A REQUIREMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AND FIRE RESCUE REVIEW. OKAY. DOES NOT MEAN NECESSARILY THAT YOU'VE GOT TO HIRE LAW ENFORCEMENT OR FIRE RESCUE SUPPORT IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE YOU'RE OVER 250. WHAT IT DOES MEAN IS YOU'VE GOT TO CHECK IN WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND WITH MARTIN COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, HAVE THEM EVALUATE YOUR PLANS AND TELL YOU IF THEY THINK YOU NEED THAT SUPPORT. AND IF SO, YOU HAVE TO PROCURE IT. IF THEY SAY, NOPE, WE'VE EVALUATED IT, YOU DON'T NEED ANY, THEN YOU DON'T NEED ANY, THE, THERE ARE SOME OTHER PROCEDURAL CHANGES AS WELL, THROUGHOUT ALL THIS TO, KIND OF MAKE CLEAR HOW THE PROCESS IS GOING TO WORK, PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TO IT BEING 100% WITHIN THE AMBIT OF STAFF, AFTER THE APPLICATION COMES IN. IT ALSO THE ORDINANCE ALSO LAYS OUT, SOME DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PERMATEASE THAT ARE KIND OF IMPLICIT IN THE ORDINANCE RIGHT NOW, BUT IT MAKES IT VERY EXPLICIT. BASICALLY, YOU GET A PERMIT AND IT SAYS YOU'RE AUTHORIZED TO DO CERTAIN THINGS.

THEM ALLOWING THINGS TO OCCUR OR PARTICIPATING IN THEIR EVENT, HAVING THINGS OCCUR THERE THAT EXCEED THAT OR RUN CONTRARY TO THAT ENDS UP BEING A VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE VERY EXPRESSLY AND CLEARLY. SO, WITH THAT, AGAIN, THIS HAS GONE THROUGH MULTIPLE ROUNDS OF REVIEW WITH

[00:40:08]

BUT I DON'T NEED A PERMIT TO HOLD AN EVENT THAT I HAVE FOR MY CUSTOMERS THAT ARE ON SITE.

THROUGH YEAH. AND THIS IS GOOD. PARDON ME. LET ME GET THIS BACK ON HERE. IT'S A GOOD FACT PATTERN BECAUSE, PRIMARILY, WE'RE DRILLING INTO, PLACES WHERE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE IT INSIDE A BUILDING, BUT IN, IN YOUR FACT PATTERN THERE, WE'D BE LOOKING AT, ACTUALLY. THANK YOU.

THIS IS THIS IS A USEFUL ONE. LET ME LET ME DIG INTO THE ORDINANCE HERE REAL QUICK BECAUSE I WANT TO APPLY THIS, AND WE CAN DISCUSS, TWEAKING IT HERE IF TWEAKING WOULD BE WARRANTED. SO LET ME ASK IF YOU DON'T MIND. LET ME LET ME ASK A COUPLE QUESTIONS JUST TO ADDRESS THIS HYPOTHETICAL, AN EVENT WOULD BE GOING ON AT THE MARINA. LET'S ASSUME IT'S THE OUTDOORS.

YEAH. BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OF HOW IT IS THERE. RIGHT? YEAH, EXACTLY, SO BE OUTDOORS. WOULD IT BE AN EVENT, OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC? NO. TYPICALLY, FOR EXAMPLE, WE DO WHAT WE CALL THANKSGIVING RENDEZVOUS, WHICH IS AN EVENT WE HOLD AT THANKSGIVING FOR USUALLY THREE DAYS OF PARTIES WE HAVE ON SITE AT THE MARINA. BUT GENERALLY THEY'RE JUST FOR MY CUSTOMERS THAT ARE AT THE MARINA. AND I JUST DON'T WANT IT TO BE CONFUSION. THAT'S SOMETHING I'VE DONE FOREVER. UNDERSTOOD? YEAH.

I SEE. IT COULD POTENTIALLY DO WITH A LITTLE BIT OF. CLARIFYING HERE, NOW, GENERALLY, IT DOESN'T EXPRESSLY EXCLUDE WHAT YOU JUST DESCRIBED THERE, BUT GENERALLY IN OUR GENERAL DEFINITION, IT'S ADDRESSED TO EVENTS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. AND SO THAT THAT'S THE FIRST INQUIRY. I WAS, YEAH. SO WE DON'T WE DON'T HAVE IT AS WE DON'T HAVE IT AS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION. OKAY BUT IT IS AN ELEMENT OF THE DEFINITION OF SPECIAL EVENT AND ENTERTAINMENTR OTHER TYPE OF UNIQUE ACTIVITY OR EVENT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC THAT MAY SUBSTANTIALLY INHIBIT THE USUAL FLOW OF PEDESTRIAN, VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, OR DEVIATES FROM THE ESTABLISHED USE OF THE PLACE OR BUILDING. FRANKLY, I'D SUGGEST, BASED ON THE LONG HISTORY OF IT OCCURRING THERE AS WELL. PROBABLY DOESN'T DEVIATE FROM THE ESTABLISHED USE SINCE YOU'VE DONE IT. AND IT'S NOT OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

TRYING TO THINK THROUGH WHETHER THERE MAY BE, AN EXPLICIT EXCLUSION THAT MIGHT MAKE THINGS A LITTLE BIT MORE, IN PLACE. AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO DROP THIS OR LET IT PERCOLATE IN MY BRAIN FOR A SECOND HERE. YES THE, BOARD MEETINGS WHERE THEY WERE DISCUSSING THIS AND THERE WAS SOME TALK ABOUT EXCLUDING, EVENTS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WOULD THAT PROVISION BE APPLICABLE? SO I HAD IN THOSE DISCUSSIONS, I HAD CONCERNS WITH WITHOUT MORE PUTTING MORE MEAT

[00:45:03]

AND I WOULD SUGGEST THE PRIMARY PROBLEM WE'RE TRYING TO AVOID IS, GIGANTIC EVENT THAT ENDS UP CAUSING A WHOLE BUNCH OF PROBLEMS FOR THE NEIGHBORS AND TRAFFIC AND ALL THIS STUFF.

WITHOUT IT BEING APPROPRIATELY MANAGED AND BEYOND THAT, YOU KNOW, NOT TRYING TO STOP EVERYBODY FROM HAVING FUN OR DOING WHATEVER, SO, TO THIS POINT, SCOTT, I, I THINK IT MIGHT BE AND I MAY NEED TO DO A LITTLE BIT MORE NOODLING ON THIS ABOUT THE WAY TO BUILD THIS IN.

BUT IT. IT MAY MAKE SENSE TO, TO CRAFT AN EXCLUSION. I MAY NEED TO DO A LITTLE BIT MORE THINKING ON PRECISELY HOW TO DO IT. THAT WOULD ADDRESS, EITHER, YOU KNOW, EVENTS, YOU KNOW, AT A BUSINESS FOR THEIR CUSTOMERS AND INVITEES. I MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT BROADER IN CASE SOMEBODY HAPPENS TO BE THERE AND A FRIEND WANDERS ALONG. WE'RE NOT, YOU KNOW, TRIGGERING ALL THIS, BUT IT'S NOT, YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY ON THE PLANET EARTH TYPE THING OR YOU'RE WHAT HAVE YOU, I, I WOULD SUGGEST, YOU KNOW, TO ADDRESS THAT CONCERN IN, IN APPROVING THIS WITH THE RECOMMENDATION MIGHT BE WITH, WITH ADDING LANGUAGE TO THAT EFFECT. AND I'LL GO TAKE A CRACK AT ADDING SOMETHING LIKE THAT. YEAH. YEAH ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH, I HAVE A QUESTION. WERE THERE ANY CHANGES, MADE TO THE AGENDA OTHER THAN WHAT WE WERE PRESENTED, VIA EMAIL LAST WEEK? OH TO THE TO THE AGENDA PACKET. YES. SO YEAH, WE ACTUALLY GOT THIS QUESTION BEFORE, I RAISED THE SAME QUESTION. YEAH AND IF THERE'S, IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE THAT THAT YOU THINK MAY JUMP OUT AT YOU, PLEASE LET ME KNOW, THE VENDOR FOR OUR AGENDA SYSTEM FOR NOVUS AGENDA AGENDA SYSTEM, SINCE THE TIME THE AGENDA WAS PUBLISHED, ACTUALLY FINALLY WORKED ON A TICKET THAT WE HAD PUT IN TO ACTUALLY IMPLEMENT CHANGES IN PCAB MEMBERS ON THE FACE OF THE FIRST PAGE OF THE AGENDA. SO THAT WAS IMPLEMENTED IN THE INTERIM THERE, THERE WAS ALSO A QUESTION ABOUT SOME SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS OR SOMETHING LIKE THIS RELATING TO THE VARIANCE. YOU ALL JUST DISCUSSED, I'VE TALKED WITH, WITH STAFF, I'VE TALKED WITH DINA AND WITH LUCY AND LARONDA, AND TO ALL OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, THERE HAVE BEEN NO CHANGES TO ANYTHING THAT WAS UPLOADED IN THE NOVA SYSTEM WITH REGARD TO THAT. AND LARONDA ACTUALLY WENT BACK IN THE NOVA

[00:50:04]

WELL, LAST WEEK I WISH YOU KNOW I DIDN'T NOTICE KNOW TO LOOK FOR IT. BUT STILL WHEN I WORKED ON IT, YOU KNOW, OVER THE WEEKEND, I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE HERE TO DEPEND ON THE WEEKEND, BUT IT'S VERY SHORT NOTICE IN THE PUBLIC. I DON'T KNOW HOW THE PUBLIC, WE CAN BARELY KEEP UP. SO I DON'T I REALLY SYMPATHIZE WITH THE PUBLIC. TRYING TO KNOW AND TRYING TO BE TRANSPARENT FOR THEM. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU? I DON'T HAVE A QUESTION, BUT I. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. BOARD MEMBER I'LL SAY THE MOTION PASSED IT WITH THE, CHANGES THAT ARE NEEDED FOR ACCOMMODATION TO THIS SITUATION. WELL, BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN THAT. YEAH, BEFORE WE ENTERTAIN THAT, I WOULD ACTUALLY LIKE TO, MY MIND BEEN EVERYWHERE, SO I HAD TO WRITE IT DOWN, BUT I WOULD ACTUALLY LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING AS A RESIDENT, AS A RESIDENT, I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS MY CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROPOSED, PROPOSED ORDINANCE THAT WOULD VEST THE AUTHORITY FOR ISSUING SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS SOLELY IN THE VILLAGE MANAGER. WHILE I DO AGREE WITH

[00:55:05]

[01:00:05]

ANYTHING ELSE FROM THE BOARD? ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? YES, MADAM CHAIR, THE FIRST IS, MISS NIKKI PARKER. HELLO, I'M NIKKI PARKER. HOW ARE YOU GUYS? CAN YOU TURN TURN THE MIC, HELLO. HOW ARE YOU? MY NAME IS NIKKI PARKER. I'M A UNFAMILIAR FACE TO THESE MEETINGS, BUT I'M FAMILIAR TO ALMOST EVERYBODY THAT'S IN HERE. I AM A RESIDENT OF BOOKER PARK, INDIAN TOWN. AS A MATTER OF FACT, I OWN THREE BUSINESSES. 1597, APOTHECARY SOLUTIONS, RESPECT AND HORSEMANSHIP, EQUINE CONSULTANTS, AND I OWN, I'M SORRY, HIS AND HERS, LANDSCAPING AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. SO I FEEL LIKE MY VOICE NEEDS TO BE HEARD. I DO AGREE WITH CHAIR, CHRISTINA. MILEY, I'M A RESIDENT HERE AND WHEN IT COMES TO DECISIONS, I FEEL LIKE THAT THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE ELECTED. SO MY TAX DOLLARS, EVERYBODY'S TAX DOLLARS IN HERE, THEY GET PAID FROM OUR TAX DOLLARS. SO WHEN IT COMES TO SETTING A STANDARD OR SETTING A PRECEDENCE, YES. THOSE THINGS THEY SHOULD APPLY. RULES APPLY TO EVERYBODY. BUT I DO FEEL LIKE THAT WHEN DECISIONS ARE MADE, THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE HIRED FOR, AND I UNDERSTAND I AGREE WITH, MR. WATSON, THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, PROBABLY NOT GOING TO BE GETTING IN TROUBLE, MAYBE OVERSTEPPING MY BOUNDARIES. BUT SOMETIMES, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE LIKE TO TAKE THE HEAT OFF OF THEMSELVES. BUT AS A RESIDENT OF INDIAN TOWN OF BOOKER PARK, IT IS IMPERATIVE BECAUSE THAT THE COUNCIL MEMBERS WRITE THAT THINGS LIKE THIS SHOULD BE BROUGHT IN FRONT OF THEM. BECAUSE FOR EXAMPLE, I DO HORSES, SO LET'S JUST USE THE RODEO AS AN EXAMPLE, OR LET'S JUST USE THE EVENTS THAT MR. WATSON HAS AT THE MARINA. IF, SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, I WANTED TO HAVE AN EVENT IN BOOKER PARK AND MY EVENT IS DENIED, OR THE APPLICATION IS DENIED BECAUSE OF WHATEVER REASON, BECAUSE ONE PERSON MADE THAT DECISION. I'M GOING TO FEEL LIKE, HEY, THEY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST ME BECAUSE NOT BECAUSE OF RACE, BECAUSE MAYBE THEY DON'T LIKE ME, MAYBE THEY HAVE A VENDETTA AGAINST ME, OR MAYBE THEY DON'T LIKE MY MOM OR MY DAD, OR MAYBE THEY DON'T LIKE ME BECAUSE OF WHATEVER REASON. MAYBE THEY DON'T LIKE

[01:05:02]

BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE AN OPEN MINDSET. THIS IS THIS IS A DEMOCRACY, RIGHT? SO WE HAVE TO HAVE AN OPEN MINDSET. WE HAVE TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION EVERYTHING AS A WHOLE. NOT OKAY.

OKAY, MAYBE MY MUSIC IS LOUD, BUT MAYBE THAT'S CULTURALLY HOW IT AFFECTS ME. BUT WHAT ABOUT YOUR MUSIC? SO WE JUST HAVE TO HAVE AN OPEN MINDSET. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. DARRYL HOLMES.

GOOD EVENING, MY NAME IS DARRYL HOLMES, NEW TO INDIAN TOWN, BUT NOT NEW TO INDIAN TOWN. AFTER THE LAST MEETING HERE WITH THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, IT WAS A WHOLE LOT THAT DISTURBED ME MOST IMPORTANTLY WAS THE CONDESCENDING TONE COMING FROM TWO OF THE MEMBERS AND I HAVE TO REMIND THEM THAT INDIAN TOWN, AS A HISTORICALLY BLACK COMMUNITY, DOES NOT NEED THEIR HAND HELD.

THEY AREN'T A PETULANT CHILD THAT NEEDS GUIDANCE. I'M SPEAKING A BOOK APART. THEY AREN'T LOST AND NEED HELP FINDING THEIR WAY. THAT IS A COMMUNITY THAT HAS BEEN DOING THINGS THEIR WAY FOR A VERY LONG TIME. COME UP TO DATE, CATCH UP TO SPEED. WE HAVE A VILLAGE COUNCIL NOW. WELL, SOME OF THE THINGS WE WERE TOLD IN THE PAST MEETING. WHAT WAS THAT TUESDAY, THURSDAY, THURSDAY THAT THE LDR, THE GUY THAT SAT THERE SAID THE LDR WAS ALREADY CHANGED. SO IT DOESN'T MATTER. WE DON'T NEED ANOTHER MEETING ON THAT OR. WELL, LO AND BEHOLD, I'M THE TYPE OF CITIZEN I'M GOING TO LOOK INTO WHAT YOU SAY. YOU CAN'T JUST TELL ME NOTHING. I'M CYNICAL. I DON'T BELIEVE NOTHING UNTIL I SEE IT. SO THAT'S JUST ME. SO I HAPPENED TO GO IN AND LOOK. NOW I SEE THAT SOME OF THE LANGUAGE SEEMS TO BE SPECIFICALLY CHANGED FOR A CERTAIN EVENT IN BOOKER PARK. NOW, THERE ARE THINGS THAT SAY MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT, AND THEN YOU HAVE TODAY WHERE WE'RE DISCUSSING SPECIAL EVENTS AND HONESTLY, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT. IF THIS IS GOING TO BE A CRITERIA THAT APPLIES FOR THEE, THOU THEM, AND US, IT HAS TO BE THAT WAY ACROSS THE BOARD, BUT IT ALSO CAN'T BE LANGUAGE INSERTED TO SPECIFICALLY TARGET A COMMUNITY, WHETHER IT BE WHITE, BLACK, HISPANIC OR WHATEVER. BECAUSE LANGUAGE MATTERS. WORDS MATTER. SO IF I'M CALLING IT A SPECIAL EVENT, I DON'T KNOW HOW IT MOVES FROM THAT TO A MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT, BUT I DON'T KNOW. I'D HAVE TO LOOK IN FURTHER TO SEE WHAT THE ACTUAL DEFINITIONS ARE, AS FAR AS THE MANAGER MAKING THE DECISIONS AND MAKING THAT DECISION, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT, BUT IT HAS TO BE A CRITERIA THAT IS BEYOND HIM. YOU MET THAT CHECK. YOU MET THAT CHECK. YOU MET THAT CHECK. YOU GET THE PERMIT. IT SHOULD BE NO FEELINGS INVOLVED. IT SHOULD BE. WELL, LET ME RUN THIS BY SO AND SO. NO NO NO NO NO. THERE'S A CRITERIA IN PLACE. YOUR JOB IS TO MAKE SURE THAT CRITERIA IS MET SO THAT THESE FOLKS CAN RECEIVE THE PERMIT. AND THAT SHOULD BE IT. THAT WAY YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT IF IT'S JUST

[01:10:02]

THANK YOU. MISS KIMBERLY JACKSON BROWN. HELLO. HELLO. I'M KIMBERLY JACKSON BROWN, VICE PRESIDENT OF CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR BOOKER PARK. ALSO, CONCERNED CITIZENS OF BOOKER PARK. WE HOST SWAMP FEST AND, THE BIGGEST THING ABOUT NOT HAVING THE COUNCIL INVOLVED IS EXCLUDING THE DIVERSITY BECAUSE OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED. WE HAD ALL THESE ACCUSATIONS AND ACCUSATIONS AND ALLEGATIONS, AND WE WEREN'T ABLE TO ADDRESS THEM. AND I JUST HAD A SIDEBAR WITH THE MAYOR TO FOR ONE, THAT WAS CARMINE THAT SAT THERE. THE OTHER DAY AND HE SAID, OH, IT'S ALREADY BEEN DONE. WELL, I JUST ADDRESSED THE MAYOR AND SAID, HEY, WERE THOSE CHANGES ADOPTED ALREADY? BECAUSE SHE HAD JUST SAID IT AGAIN, BUT IT WASN'T. SO THAT'S DECEIVING. THE COMMUNITY. WHEN YOU SIT THERE AND YOU SAY, WE'VE ALREADY DONE THIS, OKAY, WE DON'T NEED YOU GUYS. WE DON'T NEED A MEETING BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY TAKEN CARE OF THIS WHEN IT WASN'T TAKEN CARE OF. AND IT TAKES SOMEBODY DIGGING INTO IT. SOMEBODY'S READING AND ACTUALLY SAYING, OH NO, NO, WE GOT A MEETING COMING UP. LET'S TRY TO GET TO THESE MEETINGS. AND I ADMIT THAT I HAVE TO BE MORE INVOLVED AS A RESIDENT OF THIS COMMUNITY. NOW, AS FAR AS HAVING ONE PERSON TO HANDLE THIS, THAT ONE PERSON. AND I DON'T WANT TO BLAME HER BECAUSE SHE WORKS FOR THE COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WORKS FOR US AND WE DIDN'T CONSENT TO ANY OF THE THINGS THAT HAPPENED. ALL THE BACK DOOR ANTICS WHERE YOU GET A VENUE AND THEY GO TO THE HOST, THE VENUE, THE VENUE OWNER TO SAY, HEY, ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT THESE PEOPLE ON YOUR PROPERTY? HERE, HERE'S A VIDEO OF SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED.

HERE'S THIS WHAT GOES ON? AND IT WAS FAKE NEWS. NONE OF IT HAPPENED WITH US. WE'VE NEVER HAD AN ISSUE. NO SHOOTINGS, NO FIGHTING, NO ANYTHING, NOTHING BUT A PEACEABLE EVENT WITH THE COMMUNITY. AND IT'S NOT JUST I WOULDN'T SAY I'M GOING TO SAY OUR PEOPLE. I'M GOING TO SAY OUR PEOPLE. BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHY? IF EVERYBODY IN INDIAN TOWN, I LOOKED AT INDIAN TOWN THROUGH ROSE COLORED GLASSES, I SAID, HEY, WE'RE A PLACE OF LOVE. WE'RE A PLACE OF UNITY. AND HEY, I GOT A RUDE AWAKENING THIS PAST SUMMER. SO NO, WE SHOULDN'T LEAVE IT IN ONE PERSON'S HANDS.

BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH YOU SAY THERE WON'T BE ANY FEELINGS INVOLVED, THERE ARE FEELINGS INVOLVED. BECAUSE I'M SURE THAT EVERYBODY THAT PUTS IN AN APPLICATION, THEY DO NOT GO TO THE VENUE. THEY DO NOT. THE POLICE IS OVER HERE SAYING, WELL, WE DIDN'T DO IT. THEY'RE SAYING, OH, THE POLICE DID IT. AND THE POLICE SAY, OH NO, WE DIDN'T DO IT. WE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH YOU GUYS. WE ENJOYED IT. AND THEN WE GET OVER HERE AND THEY SAY, OH NO, THIS ONE DID IT. AND EVERYBODY'S DOING THIS. SO GUESS WHAT? WHEN WE GOT ALL THESE PEOPLE SITTING UP HERE AND THEY REPRESENT EVERYBODY IN OUR COMMUNITY, THEN WE CAN SAY WE CAN HAVE A FAIR DECISION AND WE CAN GO WITH WHATEVER THEY SAY. I AGREE, CHECK IT OFF. YOU DID THIS BECAUSE WE DID EVERYTHING THAT WE WAS ASKED TO DO. EVERYTHING. ANOTHER THING YOU GUYS NEED TO ADDRESS, HAVING SOMEBODY HAVE THEIR INSURANCE AND HAVE ALL IT PAY ALL OF THIS STUFF WHEN THEY SUBMIT THEIR PERMIT. BUT THEN YOU DENY THE PERMIT AND WE CAN'T GET OUR MONEY BACK FROM THE INSURANCE COMPANY. WE CAN'T GET OUR MONEY BACK WHEN WE PAYING THE SHERIFF $5,000 UP FRONT. WE CAN'T GET ALL OF THIS STUFF BACK. BUT WE GOT TO DENY APPLICATION. FOR WHAT? BECAUSE YOU DECIDED NOBODY IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. AND WE GOT SOME PEOPLE THAT CAME UP FORWARD AND SAY WE DIDN'T ASK THEM TO PUT NO, NO TRESPASSING SIGNS ON OUR PROPERTY, BUT THEY WENT AROUND COMING UP TO SWAMPFEST TO EVERY VACANT PROPERTY AND PUT NO TRESPASSING SIGNS AND BLAMED IT ON THE CITIZEN. WHEN THE CITIZENS ARE SAYING WE DIDN'T ASK FOR THAT, THEY CAME TO US. AND THAT IS NOT HOW IT'S DONE, BECAUSE WE CALLED TO CHECK TO SEE HOW IT'S DONE. THEY WOULD HAVE HAD TO GO TO THEM AND MAKE THE MAKE THE COMPLAINT. NO, YOU DON'T GO TO THE CITIZEN AND SAY, HEY, ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO CUT YOU OFF, BUT YOUR TIME EXPIRED? THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU. THAT IS IT.

CHRIS, I ASKED A QUESTION OF WADE JUST TO MAYBE A POINT OF CLARIFICATION. YES. GO AHEAD.

WADE, IS THERE AN APPEALS PROCESS? IF THE CITY MANAGER WAS TO DENY A PERMIT APPLICATION, IS THERE A APPEALS PROCESS TO THE BOARD PROPOSED ANYWAY? WHAT'S U? SET OUT RIGHT NOW IN THE SET.

OUT RIGHT NOW IN THE ORDINANCE IS, IT IS AN APPEAL. THIS MAY SOUND WEIRD. IT'S VERY COMMON IN IN A LOT OF, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL MATTERS. IT IS AN APPEAL, BUT IT'S ACTUALLY NOT AN APPEAL TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. IT'S AN APPEAL TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER. IT'S EFFECTIVELY AN

[01:15:01]

BOARD MEMBER UNSICKER AFTER HEARING THE PUBLIC'S TESTIMONY AND INPUT HERE TODAY, I BELIEVE THEY SHOULD HAVE. I DO LIKE THE IDEA OF A CUT. YOU KNOW, THE CRITERIA BASE EVERYBODY'S. YOU CHECK OFF A CHECKLIST, YOU EITHER DO IT OR YOU DON'T. BUT I DO BELIEVE THAT THE APPEALS PROCESS SHOULD GO BEFORE OUR BOARD. THE ONLY THING I CAN SEE, IF I MAY, IS THE TIMING. BECAUSE YOU HAVE WHAT, BOARD MEETINGS EVERY TWO WEEKS. AM I CORRECT? SO THAT COULD YOU COULD SEE HOW THAT COULD CAUSE A TIME RELATED ISSUE. IF SOMEONE WAS TO COME IN 30 DAYS, YOU KNOW, TWO, TWO WEEKS LATER, THEY GET DENIED, THEN THEY WANT TO APPEAL BEFORE THE BOARD. CAN YOU GET IT ON THE. BECAUSE THE AGENDA HAS TO BE ADVERTISED AND SO ON. AND SO FORTH. AND SO, I THINK IT'S GOING TO TAKE A LITTLE MORE WORK. WELL, THEY HAVE THE OPTION OF APPLYING FOR THEIR PERMITS 365 DAYS IN ADVANCE. SO IF THEY'RE GOING TO DO A BIG THING LIKE WHAT YOU GUYS DO, BY THE WAY, I HEAR NOTHING BUT GOOD STUFF ABOUT YOUR EVENT, IF THEY'RE GOING TO DO THAT, THEN THEY'RE GOING TO NEED TO GIVE THEMSELVES TIME TO GET THEIR APPLICATIONS IN EARLY, I THINK THAT 365 TO 30 DAYS, YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO IT 30 DAYS PRIOR. YOU CAN DO IT EARLIER THAN THAT. AND I THINK THAT LEAVES THAT OPTION OPEN FOR AN APPEALS PROCESS. IF YOU FEEL LIKE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE ANY TROUBLE, THEN GET YOUR PERMIT APPLICATION IN SIX MONTHS IN ADVANCE. IT'S NOT HARD TO DO.

YOU GUYS KNOW WHEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE IT FOR THE MOST PART, RIGHT? AND THEN WE CAN GO THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS BEFORE YOU HAVE TO. AND I DO THINK WE NEED TO ADDRESS THE INSURANCE AND THE POLICE BEING PAID UP FRONT. I THINK THAT'S GOT TO BE ADDRESSED BECAUSE THESE THEY CAN'T YOU KNOW, BE PUT IN THAT POSITION AND THEN HAVE A DENIAL. YES. YEAH, I AGREE. UNDERSTOOD.

IT'S GOOD QUESTION BECAUSE WE DID A LOT OF IRONING OUT IN THE GIVE ME JUST ONE SECOND HERE BECAUSE I WANT TO LAY EYES ON ONE PIECE CONCERNING THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND, AND FIRE RESCUE HERE, GIVE ME ONE SECOND. OKAY, SO JUST TO CLARIFY WHAT WE HAVE, THE REVISED VERSION OF WHAT WE HAVE IN THE, IN THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS THAT THE REQUIREMENT UPON APPLICATION, OKAY, TO BE SUFFICIENT FOR THE APPLICATION IS THAT YOU HAVE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS ADVISED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND MARTIN COUNTY FIRE RESCUE OF THE EVENT, PROVIDE THEM THE INFORMATION AND ASK THEM FOR EVALUATION OF IT TO TELL THEM THE REQUIRED LEVEL OF STAFFING. THERE WILL NOT BE A REQUIREMENT UNDER THIS THAT YOU PAY BEFORE THE PERMIT IS APPROVED. YES, MA'AM. AND I'LL I'LL ADDRESS THAT IN A MINUTE. BUT THE, WITH REGARD TO THIS, IT WOULD BE, THAT YOU'VE ENGAGED WITH THEM, GOTTEN, YOU KNOW, WHAT THEIR ASSESSMENT IS OF WHAT LEVEL OF SUPPORT YOU'LL NEED AND SO ON. BY APPLYING, YOU'RE EFFECTIVELY SAYING WHATEVER THEY SAY IS WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO ENGAGE. AND THEN WHEN THE, PERMIT IS GRANTED, YOU ENGAGE IT AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT YOU'VE ENGAGED WITH THEM, PAID THEM, TO THE VILLAGE. BUT THAT'S AN AFTER APPLICATION APPROVAL WITH REGARD TO, INSURANCE. THIS IS A STICKY WICKET. ALL RIGHT, BECAUSE I WILL JUST SHARE WITH YOU. AND IT'S NOT, IN REGARD TO JUST THIS EVENT, IT'S A COMMON THING HERE IN OTHER PLACES. IT BECOMES VERY PROBLEMATIC GETTING GETTING FOLKS TO GET THEIR CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE MADE OUT IN THE PROPER FORM. AND PROVIDING PROTECTION TO THE VILLAGE. AND TO US IN A TIMELY MANNER. SO AT SOME TIMES IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN TO REQUIRE LOOK, THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT BECAUSE OTHERWISE IF YOU LET IT BE, WE'LL LET THAT FLOAT AND GET IT TO US. AFTER YOU SUBMIT THE REST OF THE APPLICATION, IT BECOMES THE THING YOU'RE CHASING UNTIL THE END. AND I HAVE HAD INSTANCES I CAN SHARE WITH YOU, AT LEAST IN OTHER MUNICIPALITIES WHERE THEY'VE TRIED TO BE LAX ABOUT IT. AND THAT CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE JUST NEVER SHOWED UP. AND AGAIN, THAT THAT'S NOT TO ANYONE IN THIS ROOM OR ANYTHING HERE. IT IS JUST AN OCCURRENCE THAT HAPPENS. AND FOR THE INTERESTS OF THE VILLAGE, IT'S SOMETHING WE GOT TO KEEP AN EYE ON, WE CAN TRY TO THINK MORE OUTSIDE THE BOX BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT ANYBODY TO BE OUT OF

[01:20:04]

AND NOW EVERYBODY'S ENGAGED. THE EVENT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WHETHER YOU IF THE CITY OR THE VILLAGE OR WHATEVER SAYS YOU HAVEN'T GIVEN US THIS THING, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE PERMITTED AS A PRACTICAL MATTER IS GOING TO HAPPEN ANYWAYS. AND THEN WE RUN INTO THE, THE WE RUN INTO BIG PROBLEMS. SO, I'M JUST OFFERING TO YOU, I'VE BEEN DOWN THAT ROAD BEFORE. WHERE GRANTING A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT CONTINGENT ON GETTING A PIECE OF PAPER. THEN THAT PAPER DOESN'T SHOW UP. AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, IT'S ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO SAY. THE EVENT'S JUST NOT HAPPENING. AND THEN PEOPLE SHOW UP ANYWAYS. AND WHERE YOU AT? SO AGAIN, THAT'S NOT TO ARGUE AGAINST THE IDEA THAT THERE ISN'T SOME CREATIVITY THAT CAN BE PUT TO IT, BUT WELL, WHAT ABOUT THAT SOLUTION I'VE SEEN? LIKE WE DO WITH A WITH A PROJECT? WELL, WITH ANY PROJECT YOU COME IN FOR A STAFF, A STAFF MEETING OR A STAFF, WHAT AM I TRYING TO SAY? PRE-APPLICATION PROCESS POSSIBLY WHERE YOU GO THROUGH AND STAFF SAYS, OKAY, YOU MEET, YOU MEET ALL THESE CRITERIA IN THE PRE-APPLICATION, NOW THEY'RE GOING TO FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE GOING AND PURCHASING THE INSURANCE, KNOWING THAT THEY THEORETICALLY MET THE CRITERIA, ASSUMING NOTHING ELSE CHANGES IN THE IN THE MEANTIME, SO THEY CAN FEEL COMFORTABLE TO GO BUY THE INSURANCE AND THEN THE ACTUAL PERMIT PROCESS WOULD, WOULD TAKE PLACE. I GET WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. YEAH, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT KIND OF A PRE-APP PROCESS. PROCESS? YEAH. AND AT LEAST KNO, YOU KNOW, OKAY, YOU GOT TO GET THESE TEN THINGS, YOU KNOW, AND THEN THEY ONCE THEY'VE CHECKED ALL THOSE OFF, THEN THEY CAN FEEL, OKAY, WE NEED THESE ITEMS TO GIVE YOU THE, THE PERMIT QUITE, QUITE FRANKLY, THIS IS NOT A BAD IDEA. AND I JUST WANT TO OFFER, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE WE HAVE FOLKS FROM SWAMP FEST HERE AND JUST FOR ANYBODY. WE HAVE 60 DAYS IN THE ORDINANCE, RIGHT NOW. IT'S GOING TO 30. THAT'S NOT TO INVITE ANYONE TO WAIT TILL 30 DAYS. THAT IS TO AVOID SOME SITUATIONS WE'VE HAD IN THE PAST WHERE PARTICULARLY ON SMALL EVENTS WHERE IT WOULDN'T TAKE TOO MUCH AND FOLKS DON'T THINK ABOUT IT UNTIL THE 62ND DAY, AND THEN THEY DON'T GET IT INTO THE 58TH, AND THEN WE'RE IN A MESS, EVEN THOUGH IT'S SMALL AND SHOULD BE EASY. TECHNICALLY, IT CROSSED THE LINE AND SO ON, THAT 30 DAYS IS NOT AN INVITATION TO WAIT TILL DAY 30 BEFORE TO DO IT, AND PERHAPS ADDING A SENTENCE, AUTHORIZING BASICALLY A PRE-APPLICATION. YOU CAN COME IN AND MEET WITH STAFF AND GO OVER TO PRE VERIFY THAT THAT YOU MEET ALL THE CRITERIA BEFORE YOU SUBMIT YOUR FORMAL APPLICATION.

WE COULD ADD SOMETHING THAT AUTHORIZES AND STRONGLY ENCOURAGES A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING. PRIOR TO FORMAL APPLICATION TO CONFIRM THEY'RE GOING TO MEET THE CRITERIA THAT WOULD AT LEAST GIVE SOMETHING SO THEY CAN HAVE THAT DISCUSSION THAT THAT SOUNDS GREAT, BUT IN AN INSTANCE WHERE IF THE IF THE CHAIR WANTS TO LET YOU SPEAK, I'D SUGGEST COME UP TO THE MIC.

YEAH, YEAH. YOU CAN COME TO THE MIC. THANK YOU. I'M SORRY ABOUT THAT, IN AN INSTANCE WHERE WITH AN EVENT LIKE THE SWAMP FEST, WHERE WE DIDN'T MIND PURCHASING OUR INSURANCE. MISS KIM, CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE? KIMBERLY JACKSON BROWN, WE DIDN'T MIND PURCHASING OUR INSURANCE BECAUSE WE CHECKED OFF EVERYTHING WE HAD. EVERYTHING CHECKED OFF. EVERYTHING WAS ALL OUR DUCKS WERE IN A ROW. THERE WAS NO REASON WE DID THE WHOLE CHECK OFF, SO THERE WAS NO REASON WHY WE COULDN'T GET A PERMIT. BUT THEN WE RAN INTO ALL OF THOSE INSTANCES WHERE WE HAD PEOPLE GOING TO OUR VENDOR, TO OUR VENUE HOSTS SAYING, HEY, YOU SURE YOU WANT THIS VILLAGE STAFF? YOU SURE YOU WANT THIS? YOU SURE YOU DON'T? AND NOW WE GOT NO TRESPASSING SIGNS. WE GOT INSURANCE. NOW WE GOT TO PAY AGAIN TO EVEN CHANGE EVERYTHING ON THE INSURANCE TO A DIFFERENT VENUE. SO WE CAME OUT OF POCKET A COUPLE OF TIMES. SO WHAT'S TO STOP US FROM RUNNING INTO

[01:25:01]

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE VILLAGE MANAGER HAVING. SO POWER TO MAKE THAT MAKE THE DETERMINING DECISION ON SPECIAL EVENTS. SURE. SO, A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT WAYS THE BOARD MAY HANDLE IT, IF THERE'S DISCUSSION AMONG THE, THE BOARD MEMBERS TO, TO INCLUDE A REVISION THAT MIGHT ADDRESS YOUR CONCERN TO SOME DEGREE, IF NOT COMPLETE, COMPLETELY, THEN, YOU MAY BE ABLE TO SUPPORT A MOTION THAT INCLUDES THAT IF A MOTION IS MADE THAT THAT YOU CAN'T AGREE WITH, ON THAT, WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND IS, ULTIMATELY, IF YOU CAN'T SUPPORT A MOTION, YOU KNOW, YOU WOULD VOTE AGAINST IT. IT CAN BE NOTED IN THE, THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING THAT YOU SUPPORTED ALL OF IT, BUT DIDN'T SUPPORT THAT THAT ONE PIECE. BUT ULTIMATELY IT COMES DOWN TO WHATEVER THE MOTION ENDS UP BEING, THE, YOU KNOW, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE WITH, WHATEVER RECOMMENDED CHANGES, YOU'D HAVE TO DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT YOU COULD LIVE WITH THE THOSE RECOMMENDED CHANGES. SO, SO I WOULD ASK THE YOU HAVE YOUR THING. YEAH. I WAS GOING TO ACQUIESCE TO HER FIRST. SHE'S GOT JUST A MINUTE. SO I WOULD ASK, MY FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS, WHICH I BELIEVE ALL OF YOU MAY HAVE ATTENDED THE MEETING ON THURSDAY, MAY, OR MAY NOT HAVE ATTENDED THE MEETING ON THURSDAY. AND TERRY, MISS TERRY MADE MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT SHE EVEN DISSENTED. IN THE VILLAGE MANAGER MAKING THAT ULTIMATE DECISION. SO IF I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU GUYS FEEL ABOUT THIS ORDINANCE, BUT. IF WE CAN DISCUSS LIKE, I THINK IT'D BE OKAY TO ASK THE VILLAGE COUNCIL TO REVISIT THE ISSUE WITHOUT TELLING, WITHOUT TELLING THEM THE SPECIFICALLY WHAT WE WANT THEM TO DO, BUT THAT WE HAVE A GRAVE CONCERNS. OR THERE ARE SOME SAY, GRAVE. WE HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE SOLE POWER SHOULD SHOULD SIT WITH THE VILLAGE MANAGER OR THE COUNCIL AND ASK, BECAUSE ULTIMATELY THEY'RE GOING TO REVISIT IT ANYWAY, OR THEY'RE GOING TO THINK ABOUT WHAT HAS BEEN SAID HERE TONIGHT, I THINK WE COULD TAKE A STAB AT A MOTIO, THAT MIGHT INCLUDE A FEW OF THE FEW OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT TONIGHT, ALONG WITH ASKING THE VILLAGE COUNCIL TO REVISIT THE ISSUE OF WHO HAS THE ULTIMATE LAST SAY IN APPROVING A PERMIT, I DON'T KNOW, WHAT DO YOU THINK, WADE? YEAH. NO NOT YET, AND I DO. BUT BEFORE YOU ALL MAKE A MOTION, I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT ONE THING TO KEEP IN MIND, CURRENTLY, RIGHT NOW, UNDER THE CURRENT ORDINANCE, ALL RIGHT. UNLESS CERTAIN THINGS OCCUR, IT IS RIGHT NOW, CURRENTLY, THE VILLAGE MANAGER WHO MAKES THE DECISION. OKAY, IT IS ONLY IN INSTANCES WHERE, WHERE THERE'S A NEED FOR STREET CLOSINGS, FOR OFF STREET PARKING, FOR AMPLIFIED ENTERTAINMENT.

VILLAGE, CO SPONSORSHIP OR, ATTENDANCE OVER 1500 OR A FIREWORKS DISPLAY. SO ONE OR MORE OF THOSE THAT IT GOES TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY OF THOSE, IT'S

[01:30:03]

OKAY. WITH REGARD TO THE IDEA OF A MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT, THAT'S ACTUALLY A NARROWING. OKAY. IT IS SETTING THAT DEFINITION OF MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT TO SAY, EVENTS OVER 250. IT'S NOT INCREDIBLY BIG, BUT IT'S EVENTS OVER 250. THOSE ARE THE ONES THAT THEY EVEN HAVE TO TALK, THOSE ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO EVEN TALK WITH MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND, AND MARTIN COUNTY FIRE RESCUE. THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE JUST, SWAMPFEST. THAT WOULD BE ANY EVENT ANYWHERE IN THE VILLAGE THAT HAS OVER 250, ANTICIPATED ATTENDEES. SO, I JUST WANTED TO ADDRESS THAT THOUGHT. I CAN UNDERSTAND, YOU KNOW, WHERE, YOU KNOW, THERE MIGHT BE, ANYTHING ABOUT THAT, BUT JUST WANTED TO SHARE THAT JUST AS AN ASIDE AS WELL, JUST TO CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD, I DO SEEM TO RECALL FROM THE LAST VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING, I RECALL COUNCIL MEMBER DEPAULO DID AT FIRST INDICATE HE THOUGHT THAT THE, SPECIAL EVENT ORDINANCE REVISIONS HAD ALREADY GONE THROUGH AND SO ON. I SEEM TO RECALL THAT ON IN THE PUBLIC MEETING THERE THAT I STEPPED IN AND CORRECTED HIM, THAT, THAT WE HAVEN'T ACTUALLY GONE THROUGH AND DONE THAT YET. SO I THINK THAT WAS JUST COMING FROM HIS NOT RECALLING AT THAT MOMENT PRECISELY WHAT STEP IN THE PROCESS IS. THESE PROCESSES CAN BE YOU KNOW, DRAWN OUT. SO I JUST WANTED TO MENTION THAT FOR THE RECORD. BUT THANK YOU. AND BEFORE WE MAKE A MOTION, CAN YOU CAN ADDRESS. HI EVERYBODY. AGAIN. MY NAME IS NICKY PARKER. I HAVE A DUMB QUESTION AND I KNOW NO QUESTION IS DUMB RIGHT. SO I DID A LITTLE RESEARCH, BUT BEFORE I YOU KNOW, TALK ABOUT THE RESEARCH, THE CHAIR, SHE TALKED ABOUT IT AND YOU JUST TALKED ABOUT IT, BUT I, I KIND OF NEED A LITTLE CLARITY ON A MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT, AND I KNOW IT'S LIKE 250 OR ABOVE, BUT SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, I GO TO A SAVED, SANCTIFIED, HOLY GHOST FILLED FIRE BAPTIZED CHURCH, RIGHT? AND WE SPEAK IN TONGUES AND LAY HANDS ON ALL OF THOSE GOOD THINGS. SO AT ANY TIME WE CAN HAVE OVER 250 PEOPLE. AND I KNOW YOU, YOU, YOU IMPLIED THAT IF IT'S A CHURCH, BUT WHAT IF THE PARKING OR WHATEVER. OKAY, SAY FOR EXAMPLE, IF SOMEBODY DIES AND IT'S A FUNERAL, THAT IT THE PARKING. RIGHT. SO SAY FOR EXAMPLE, AND I'M NOT POINTING A FINGER AT ANYBODY AND I'M JUST TALKING ABOUT CHURCH BECAUSE I'M TALKING ABOUT WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. BUT LIKE AT CHURCH, FOR EXAMPLE, LIKE SOMETIMES THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY, THEY HAVE REVIVALS, THEY HAVE LIKE TENT REVIVALS. SO HOW CAN WE SAY DEFINITELY, YOU KNOW WHAT? MR. BOSS? BOSS BOSS, BOSS. I'M SORRY, MR. WADE. IT'S GOING TO BE EXACTLY 249 PEOPLE. THAT'S UP. NO. SO I JUST, YOU KNOW, THE LANGUAGE WHEN IT SAYS MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT, BECAUSE WHEN I, WHEN I GOT HERE EARLIER, YOU WERE JUST SAYING SPECIAL EVENT. SO I'M JUST KIND OF CONFUSED. I JUST NEED A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.

[01:35:06]

THERE'S TWO THINGS THAT CAN TRIGGER IT, IT'S EITHER, 250 OR MORE FOLKS, OR A SPECIAL EVENT THAT INCLUDES ROAD CLOSURES OR RIGHT OF WAY USAGE. OKAY, SO THAT'S TWO WAYS. BASICALLY THE ONLY THING THAT MEANS WE GOT ALL THESE REGULATIONS, IF IT TRIGGERS ONE OF THOSE TWO THINGS, IT JUST TRIGGERS AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT. AND THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT IS, HEY, YOU'VE GOT TO SUBMIT YOUR PLANS TO MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MARTIN COUNTY FIRE RESCUE. HAVE THEM LOOK AT IT AS WELL TO EVALUATE IT, TO SEE, HEY, ARE THEY GOING TO NEED ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT OR ARE THEY GOING TO NEED ANY FIRE RESCUE SUPPORT. AND THAT'S BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE EVENT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. AND REMEMBER THAT'S THE KEY. THAT'S THE KEY DISTINGUISHING FACTOR HERE WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THINGS LIKE FUNERALS AND SO ON, IS SPECIAL EVENTS ARE ARE ADDRESSING EVENTS THAT ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. ALL RIGHT, SO THAT'S ALL THAT MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT MEANS IS IT HAS THAT ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT. MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MARTIN COUNTY FIRE RESCUE NEED TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE PLANS AS WELL. IN ADDITION TO JUST VILLAGE STAFF. AND QUITE FRANKLY, IT'S BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT IN IN HOUSE AT THE VILLAGE. IF WE HAD IT IN HOUSE AT THE VILLAGE, WE MIGHT NOT EVEN HAVE THAT THRESHOLD. WE JUST SEND EVERY PLAN OVER TO OUR IN-HOUSE ONES AS WELL, BUT WE DON'T HAVE THEM. SO THAT'S ALL THAT IS. IT'S JUST THAT ADDITIONAL THING AT THAT THRESHOLD. DON'T WANT TO HAVE THAT TRIGGERED FOR SOMETHING THAT'S SMALLER. AND IT IS I UNDERSTAND IT IS VERY, IF YOU DIDN'T SEE SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT, THERE'S A MILLION DIFFERENT THINGS THEY COULD CALL IT, IT IS A COMMON THING TO HAVE DIFFERENT THRESHOLDS FOR DIFFERENT ATTENDANCE SIZES IN SPECIAL EVENTS, ORDINANCES. BUT OF COURSE, ALL SORTS OF DIFFERENT SPECIAL EVENTS. ORDINANCES CAN BE DIFFERENT. I HOPE THAT HELPS A LITTLE BIT.

THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? YES. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT I BELIEVE THAT IT'S A FAIRLY SIMPLE FIX. I THINK THE FOLKS HERE CAN AGREE THAT, WE SHOULD HAVE A WAY OF GETTING THIS IN FRONT OF THE BOARD MEMBERS IF THERE'S AN APPLICATION OF DENIAL. SO FOR AN APPEAL, AS YOU STATED, THE PROCESS IS ALREADY IN THE HANDS OF THE MANAGER, UNLESS SOMETHING TRIGGERS IT NEEDING TO GO BEFORE THE BOARD. SO IT SEEMS LIKE THE SIMPLEST ANSWER IS ALL THE REVISIONS, ALL THE WORDING, EVERYTHING THAT YOU'VE DONE IN THIS, PROPOSAL IS EXCELLENT, EXCEPT FOR WHERE WE ARE FINDING THAT THEY FEEL LIKE THE PUBLIC FEELS LIKE PUTTING IT ALL IN ONE PERSON'S HANDS IS QUESTIONABLE. SO MY SUGGESTION WOULD BE THAT WE MY MOTION WOULD BE THAT WE APPROVE THE CHANGES, BUT ADD VERBIAGE THAT ALLOWS FOR ANYONE THAT'S HAD THEIR PERMIT AT LEAST 60 DAYS IN ADVANCE TO DO AN APPEAL. IN FRONT OF THE BOARD, IF THEY'VE GOT A PROBLEM. AND ALSO ADDING THE PRE PRE QUALIFICATIONS MEETING ALLOWING FOR THEM TO GET BASICALLY ALL THE APPROVAL THAT THEY NEED AND

[01:40:03]

WE'RE JUST KIND OF TRYING TO CLARIFY IT, THAT IT'S ANYTHING OVER 250 THAT THEN WOULD KICK IN THAT REQUIREMENT FOR POTENTIALLY FIRE OR SHERIFF DEPARTMENT SUPPORT. SO I BELIEVE THAT WHAT I'M HEARING IS THAT IF THERE'S A REASON FOR THE BOARD TO PROCESS ANY KIND OF REVIEW OR APPEAL, THAT WE NEED TO SET UP SOME SORT OF VERBIAGE THAT ALLOWS FOR TIME. IF THESE GOOD FOLKS GET THEIR APPLICATION IN 3 OR 4 MONTHS EARLY, AND LET'S SAY WE HAVE TO CUT THAT APPEALS PROCESS OBVIOUSLY OFF AT A CERTAIN TIME. MAYBE IF YOU DON'T GET YOUR APPLICATION IN AT THE 60 DAY POINT WHERE IT IS NOW, THEN THERE'S NO APPEALS PROCESS. YOU'VE LOST YOUR RIGHT TO APPEA.

BUT IF YOU IF YOU'RE DILIGENT AND YOU GET YOUR, APPLICATION IN PRIOR TO 60 DAYS, THAT GIVES US AN OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAL. IF THERE'S AN ISSUE, IF WE COULD POTENTIALLY PUT SOME WORDING IN LIKE THAT, I THINK MAYBE IT WOULD BE SATISFACTORY AND THAT WOULD BE MY RECOMMENDATION.

WELL, I'M NOT ENTERTAINING, A MOTION AT THE MOMENT. I ACTUALLY HAVE A QUESTION. MR. WADE, THAT I NEED CLARIFICATION ON, PLEASE. YES, MA'AM. SO, IF CERTAIN CRITERIA TRIGGERS, WHETHER IN THE PAST CERTAIN CRITERIA, CRITERIA WOULD TRIGGER IF, THE PERMIT WENT BEFORE THE BOARD, SUCH AS ALL THE EXAMPLES THAT YOU NEEDED, THE ONLY ONE I CAN THINK OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD IS THE 1500 PEOPLE. IF IT WAS HAVING AN EVENT AND IT HAD 1500 PEOPLE, IT WOULD TRIGGER IT TO GO IN FRONT OF THE BOARD. SO WITH SAID CHANGES, DOES THAT STILL HAPPEN OR IT DOESN'T HAPPEN? AND THE DECISION IS MADE BY THE VILLAGE MANAGER. SO UNDER THE ORDINANCE, AS IT'S BEFORE YOU RIGHT NOW. OKAY. THE THE PROVISION THAT SAYS, WHEN ANY ONE OF THE LIST OF THINGS I LISTED OUT BEFORE 1500 OR MORE ATTENDEES BEING ONE OF THEM, ANY OF THOSE THINGS HAPPEN, THEN THE APPLICATION HAS TO GO IN FRONT OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. THAT REQUIREMENT WOULD BE TAKEN OUT UNDER THE CURRENT DRAFT, NOW AGAIN, YOU KNOW, TO THE MOTION THAT WAS JUST, DESCRIBED A MOMENT AGO, IT WOULD NOT BE HAVING IT AUTOMATICALLY GOING TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL IN, IN EVERY INSTANCE OR ON THOSE CRITERIA. BUT IN AN INSTANCE WHERE, AN APPLICATION WAS DENIED AND THEY WANTED TO APPEAL IT TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL AND FOR POINT OF DISCUSSION, AGAIN, IT MAY ACTUALLY BE ADVANTAGEOUS FROM THE POINT OF GETTING IT APPROVED QUICKER. YOU KNOW, THE VILLAGE MANAGER, LET'S SAY THE VILLAGE MANAGER SAID THEY CHECKED OFF ALL THE CHECKS. HERE'S YOUR PERMIT. ONLY IF YOU GET DENIED BY THE VILLAGE MANAGER, WOULD YOU NEW IMMEDIATELY FILL OUT THE, YOU KNOW, APPEAL PROCESS TO GO BEFORE THE BOARD? IT MAY ACTUALLY SPEED UP THE PROCESS IN MOST CASES, UNLESS THERE'S AN ISSUE, I'M JUST THINKING OUT LOUD WHEN I SAY THIS, NOW ONE THING, IS THERE A TIME CERTAIN THAT STAFF MUST REVIEW AND RENDER A JUDGMENT ON A PERMIT APPLICATION? IF THERE IS SO UNDER THE, UNDER THE REVISED DRAFT ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU, THIS IS DOWN ON PAGE 11 OF THE DRAFT NOTICE OF REJECTION. VILLAGE MANAGER SHALL TAKE ACTION ON AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT WITHIN TEN DAYS AFTER THE FILING THEREOF, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE APPLICANT OF THE APPROVAL WITHOUT CONDITIONS OR DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION WITHIN FIVE DAYS. IF THE APPLICATION IS DENIED, IS DENIED A WRITTEN NOTICE STATING THE REASONS FOR DENIAL SHALL BE SENT TO THE APPLICANT, MADE AVAILABLE BY THE VILLAGE FOR INSPECTION WITHIN THE FIVE DAY PERIOD SPECIFIED ABOVE. SO, THEY HAVE TO THEY GET IN THE, APPLICATION. THE

[01:45:03]

AND IN A GIVEN INSTANCE IT WAS STILL, AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, MORE THAN ENOUGH TIME. BUT IT WAS UNTIMELY. SO IT IS IT STRONGLY, IT IS VERY WISE FOR ANY APPLICANT FOR ANY EVENT, PARTICULARLY ANY EVENT OF ANY SIGNIFICANCE OR SIZE, TO APPLY WELL BEFORE THAT 30 DAY MARK SO THAT THEY CAN CONFIRM THAT THEY ARE, YOU KNOW, THAT THEY HAVE A COMPLETE APPLICATION IN BY THE DEADLINE. AND KEEP IN MIND, IT'S THIS IS UNIQUELY DIFFERENT THAN SAY, YOU KNOW, THE VARIANCE YOU HAD EARLIER TONIGHT, RIGHT? FOLKS MAY COME IN WITH THE STUFF AND SAY ALL RIGHT, HERE'S EVERYTHING UP. WELL, YOU'RE MISSING TWO THINGS. YOU MISSED THE DEADLINE TO GET ON THIS AGENDA, SO. OH, WHOOPS. OH, WELL THEY'RE ON. THEY'LL BE ON THE NEXT AGENDA AFTER THAT. NOT THE END OF THE WORLD. NOT WHAT THEY WANTED, BUT NOT THE END OF THE WORLD. BUT IF YOU HAVE AN EVENT AND THAT EVENT IS GOING TO BE ON A DAY AND YOU'RE NOT GOING TO CHANGE THAT DAY, IT'S MUCH MORE OF AN ISSUE, WHICH IS WHY IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO APPLY WAY EARLY. BOARD MEMBER UNSAGA YEAH, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU, SO I DIDN'T AGREE WITH THE 30. THE CHANGE TO THE 30 DAYS INITIALLY BECAUSE FOR THIS VERY REASON, IF YOU JUST RUN OUT OF TIME, IT'S REALLY PUTTING A LOT OF PRESSURE ON THE STAFF TO GET THAT DONE IN 30 DAYS, ESPECIALLY IF THERE ARE MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS. SO IF WE DID A, IF WE LEFT IT AT 60 DAYS, BUT GAVE A 30 DAY APPEAL PROCESS, WOULD THAT GIVE STAFF ENOUGH TIME TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? SO IN OTHER WORDS, YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO APPLY WITHIN 60 DAYS BEFORE YOUR THING, BUT YOU GIVE THAT PROCESS A 30 DAY PERIOD. AND THEN AT THAT 30 DAY, YOU CAN'T BRING ANYTHING ELSE IN AFTER THAT. YOU'VE GOT TO GET EVERYTHING DONE BETWEEN THAT SIX 31ST DAY AND THAT 60TH DAY. BUT REALLY, YOUR APPLICATION STATES THAT YOU NEED TO GET IT IN AND THEN YOU'VE JUST GOT THAT PROCESS, PERIOD, BECAUSE I DO BELIEVE THAT HAVING 30 DAYS IS GOING TO INVITE PEOPLE TO DO IT ON DAY 31. AND I DON'T THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA FOR ANYBODY.

SO I DON'T AGREE WITH THE CHANGE FOR THE 30 DAYS. I THINK WE NEED TO CLARIFY THAT LANGUAGE THAT IT NEEDS TO BE THE APPLICATION NEEDS TO BE IN 60 DAYS BEFORE YOUR EVENT, AND THEN THERE'S AN APPEALS PROCESS THAT CAN TAKE UP WHATEVER THE EVERYBODY AGREES TO IS A DECENT AMOUNT OF TIME FOR STAFF TO TELL THEM WHAT THEY NEED, AND THEN THEY COMPLY WITHIN THAT 30 DAYS, BECAUSE MOST OF THESE BIG EVENTS TAKES MONTHS AND MONTHS TO DO ANYWAY. SO PEOPLE SHOULD GET THEIR PAPERWORK IN ON TIME. I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WHAT EVENT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. IT WAS A SAD SITUATION, BUT PEOPLE JUST NEED TO GET THEIR PAPERWORK IN ON TIME. AND IF WE HAVE THAT APPEALS PERIOD IN THERE FOR A DENIAL, NOT FOR YOU TO RUN IN YOUR PAPERWORK IN BETWEEN THE 60 AND THE 30TH DAY THAT YOU JUST FORGOT TO DO. BUT AN APPEALS PERIOD WOULD ALLOW SOMEBODY THAT FORGOT TO DO SOMETHING, TO FILE AN APPEAL AND SAY, OOPS, I FORGOT. I GOT A DENIAL, BUT I FORGOT TO DO THIS PIECE OF PAPER. I CAN BRING IT IN. I'LL HAVE IT TO YOU BEFORE THE 30TH

[01:50:02]

I THINK IT LEAVING IT AT 60. ANYWAY, BECAUSE IF YOU KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE AN EVENT THAT'S PUBLIC AND PEOPLE ARE COMING FROM THE PUBLIC, THEN YOU PLAN IT AHEAD OF TIME. IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO PLAN AN EVENT AND HAVE IT 60 DAYS LATER. SO I THINK ALL EVENTS SHOULD BE AT 60 DAYS FROM THE AUDIENCE. I THINK MIGHT WE MIGHT ENTERTAIN ONE. THE LAST PUBLIC COMMENT, AND I KNOW THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OUT OF ORDER, BUT I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE IT NEEDS TO BE SAID. MY NAME IS DARYL HOLMES AGAIN, AND I SPOKE BEFORE I SAID THAT LANGUAGE MATTERS. IT DOES.

MANAGER UNDERSTANDS THAT HE'S SPEAKING THE LANGUAGE. HERE IT SAYS UNDER SECTION 3-5. TEN SPECIAL EVENTS. SPECIAL EVENTS IS CROSSED OUT. THERE'S A DEFINITION HERE THAT IS UNDERLINED AND IT SAYS MAJOR SPECIAL EVENTS. THE MANAGER SPOKE ABOUT CERTAIN THINGS TRIGGERING THE SPECIAL EVENT. IT'S NOT HOW IT HAPPENS. I MEAN THAT MAY BE THE LANGUAGE HE DECIDES TO USE. THAT'S FINE. AND I'M A STRAIGHT SHOOTER. IT'S NO DISRESPECT. THIS IS JUST HOW I TALK. EITHER YOU HAVE THIS TYPE OF EVENT, THIS TYPE OF EVENT, OR THIS TYPE OF EVENT. THERE ARE NO TRIGGERS THAT SAY, OKAY, NOW YOU'VE MOVED TO A SPECIAL NO, I'M COMING TO YOU AS A SPECIAL EVENT. I'M COMING TO YOU AS A MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT. THERE ARE NO TRIGGERS. MAJOR SPECIAL EVENT A SPECIAL EVENT LANGUAGE AGAIN ESTIMATED TO HAVE 250 OR MORE ATTENDEES OR A SPECIAL EVENT THAT INCLUDES ROAD CLOSURES OR RIGHT OF WAY USAGE WHILE THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF ATTENDEES. LANGUAGE FINAL DETERMINATION OF THE ESTIMATED NUMBER OF ATTENDEES SHALL LANGUAGE MADE BY VILLAGE MANAGER BASED ON ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ALL OF THIS IS NEW LANGUAGE. ALL OF THIS HAS BEEN ADDED. NOW I CAN'T THINK OF ANOTHER EVENT IN INDIAN TOWN WHERE SOMEBODY MIGHT BE IN THE STREETS PARTYING, WHERE SOMEBODY MIGHT BE IN THE STREETS MOVING AROUND THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND I'M SAYING THIS TO SAY THAT ALL OF THIS NEEDS TO BE REVISITED BY EVERYBODY. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE PASSED THROUGH WILLY NILLY, BECAUSE WE'RE GOING THROUGH THIS PROCESS AND WE'RE HERE TODAY, AND THIS IS THIS NEEDS TO BE REVISITED. THERE'S SOME LANGUAGE IN HERE THAT IS VERY DISTURBING TO ME AND EVERYBODY ELSE IN HERE. THE VILLAGE MANAGER SHALL DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF ATTENDEES TO MY, MY EVENT. AND I'VE ALREADY TOLD HIM HOW MANY GOING TO BE HERE, BUT HE CAN DECIDE. NO, THAT AIN'T HOW MANY. IT'S GOING TO BE 1500. SO NOW IT TRIGGERS SOMETHING ELSE. AND NOW WE GOT TO JUMP THROUGH THESE HOOPS. NOW LANGUAGE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. GO AHEAD, MADAM CHAIR. YEAH IF I COULD ADDRESS THAT, VERY QUICKL, THE, AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, BEFORE YOU ARE SPECIAL EVENT REGULATIONS. WE HAVE ALL THESE REGULATIONS THAT THAT APPLY HERE. IT IS ONLY WHATEVER PHRASEOLOGY ONE MIGHT USE WHEN IT EXCEEDS SOME THRESHOLD IN EITHER THE NUMBER OF ATTENDEES OR ROAD CLOSURES OR RIGHT OF WAY USAGE. AGAIN, THESE ARE THESE ARE ROADS THAT ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. AND THEN THE VILLAGE USING ITS AUTHORITY TO CLOSE THOSE ROADS, YOU KNOW, FOR A GIVEN INSTANCE AND SO ON. IT'S IN THOSE INSTANCES WHERE IN PUTTING THIS TOGETHER, THE EVALUATION WAS THAT YOU'D HAVE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND FIRE RESCUE EVALUATION OF THOSE EVENTS THAT IMPACT THE ROADWAY NETWORK

[01:55:04]

[02:00:02]

[5.  

Monthly Director's Report

DEVELOPMENT WE HAVE A DRAFTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER. IT'S CLOSE TO APPROVAL AS A MINOR STORE. AWAY IS ANOTHER ONE. THAT'S AN ADDITION. THAT'S A MINOR SITE PLAN THAT'S, CLOSE TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER, BEING ISSUED THE DOLLAR TREE IS, A MINOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION THAT'S UNDER REVIEW, JUST PENDING A COUPLE OF MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. INDIAN TOWN WASTEWATER TREATMENT, PLANT PROPERTY IS THE CEDRON, WE JUST HAD THE APPLICATION RESUBMITTED.

THE APPLICANT TEAM, THIS WEEK. SO THAT WASN'T UPDATED ON THIS AGENDA. RCC CONSTRUCTION IS THE REMOVAL OF LOT LOT NINE IN THE VENTURE PARK PAD AS PART OF THE RCC APPROVAL. SO THAT'S, CLOSE TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL AS A MINOR SITE PLAN. DE MARCELLUS IS AN ADDITION OF 19,500FT■S OF MANUFACTURING AND THEN, WE'VE GOT DUPLICATION. APOLOGIES FOR THE INDIAN TOWN, THAT'S THE SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATIONS THAT ARE IN REVIEW. AND THEN WE'VE ALSO GOT THE APPROVE, WHICH IS AN EXTENSIVE LIST, THE ONE OF SIGNIFICANCE THAT'S BEEN ADDED IS THE SEMINOLE CROSSING. IT WAS A MINOR SITE PLAN, JUST RECONFIGURATION ON SOME LOTS, WHICH WAS PROCESSED AND APPROVED, WITH A DEVELOPMENT ORDER. THAT'S THE END OF THE DEVELOPER. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY OF THE APPROVALS AND IN REVIEW PROCESS, IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO RESPOND.

THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? BOARD MEMBERS. I'D LIKE TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR COMING OUT AND JOINING OUR MEETING TONIGHT. IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE, WE ADJOURN.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.