YOU READY? YOU ARE. OKAY. GOOD. ALL RIGHT, SO. LET'S SEE. I'M GOING TO CALL TO ORDER THE
[00:00:11]
MAGISTRATE HEARING FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN FOR TUESDAY, JULY 16TH, 2024. PLEASE RISE. JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. OKAY PLEASE BE SEATED. ALL RIGHT. LONG. DOCKET BUT LOTS OF COMPLIANCE, WHICH IS GREAT, LOOKS LIKE DO YOU WANT TO JUST START AT THE TOP OF THE DOCKET? WELL, YEAH. ALL RIGHT, SO, THE FIRST CASE IS ACTUALLY THE BOTTOM OF THE FRONT PAGE. CASE NUMBER 24079, RICHARD AND DIANE MANCILLA, IT'S A CONTINUANCE REQUEST. AND, OFFICER ALONSO, YOU'RE GOING TO TESTIFY AS A MATTER OF FACT, YOU MIGHT AS WELL BOTH JUST RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH. AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. SO HELP YOU GOD? YES, SIR. YES. ALL RIGHT. MY TOO FAR AWAY FROM THE MICROPHONE. I GOT GREEN LIGHT. THAT'S GOOD. RIGHT. YEAH, I'VE GOT GREEN LIGHT, SO.OKAY. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. SO AGAIN THIS IS CASE NUMBER 24079 RICHARD AND DIANE MANCIA, AND IT'S A REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE. AND OFFICER ALONSO, YOU'VE BEEN SWORN IN. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY, YOU CAN TELL ME ABOUT THIS CASE. YES, THIS CASE WAS, WAS DONE PROACTIVELY, BACK ON JUNE SIX, SINCE THEN, I HAVE SPOKEN WITH THE RESPONDENT. HE CAME IN AND SAID THAT HE NEEDED A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME TO GET THINGS CLEANED UP, AND I TOLD HIM I WOULD GIVE HIM TILL AUGUST. SO IT'S, LOOKS LIKE TRASH, WEEDS, OUTDOOR STORAGE KIND OF ISSUE. YES AND, HAVE THEY MADE PROGRESS? THEY HAVE, THEY'VE CUT DOWN, THE GRASS KIND OF CLEANED UP A LITTLE BIT. THEY JUST STILL HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF OUTDOOR STORAGE THAT THEY NEED TO PICK UP. OKAY. SO, SO BASED ON, THEM BEING, PROACTIVE IN TAKING CARE OF THE VIOLATIONS, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CONTINUE IT. TO THE AUGUST. LET'S SEE. IT'S AUGUST 20TH. YES OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. SO ORDERED. OKAY. AND THEN THE NEXT PAGE, THE FIRST FOUR CASES HAVE COMPLIED. IS THAT CORRECT? YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT, SO NOW WE'RE DOWN TO ITEM 12, WHICH IS, CASE NUMBER 24084. SANTOS. WELL, I GUESS IT'S MORELLO. SANTOS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 17 189 SOUTHWEST CHARLESTON STREET. AND OFFICER PEREZ, YOU'VE ALSO BEEN SWORN IN, AND WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM YOU. OKAY, SO THIS CASE WAS, INITIATED PROACTIVELY, BY OUR DEPARTMENT ON JUNE 7TH OF 2024, WITH REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY AT 17189 SOUTHWEST CHARLESTON STREET, THE OWNER HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS, MORRELL EXANTUS, WHICH HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU ON THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORD AS EXHIBIT ONE. UPON RESPONDING TO THE, SITE, WE OBSERVED, VIOLATIONS UNDER
[00:05:16]
SECTION 91.32 FOR ABANDONED SALVAGE AND JUNK PROPERTY. MARK, BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT TWO, WE, DOCUMENTED THESE VIOLATIONS. WE HAVE EXHIBIT TWO, A THE TOP DEPICTION, SHOWS TWO VEHICLES THAT, UNKNOWN IF THEY'RE PHYSICALLY IN AN INOPERABLE STATE, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE, VALID, FLORIDA TAGS AND REGISTRATIONS, AND THEN SO THIS WOULD BE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. OKAY, AND THEN ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, GOING INTO THE BOTTOM DEPICTION OF TWO A, YOU'LL SEE A WHITE SEDAN, WITH DAMAGE TO THE FRONT END. YES, AND IF YOU KEEP GOING INTO EXHIBIT TWO, B, THERE'S A DEPICTION OF THE BACK END OF THE, SEDAN. NOW THIS HERE THAT YOU SEE THERE IN TWO B, IS WHAT'S CURRENTLY POSTED ON THE OTHER TWO VEHICLES AS WELL. IT'S A PAPER TAG INDICATING THAT THE VEHICLE IS PRIVATE PROPERTY, OUTSIDE OF THAT, IT LOOKS LIKE MORE OF A DEALERSHIP TAG, THAT'S REGISTERED TO THE STATE OF, I BELIEVE IT'S MINNESOTA IS WHAT IT REFERENCES ON THE PAPER TAG. THE FOLLOWING CASE AS WELL HAS, IS RELATED IN A SENSE BECAUSE THE PAPER TAG IS SIMILAR. AND THE ONLY REASON WHY I BRING THAT UP IS BECAUSE WE HAVE A DEPICTION THAT'S A LITTLE CLOSER, THAT SHOWS KIND OF THE DETAILS OF THE, OF THE PAPER TAG, BUT IT REALLY JUST INDICATES THAT IT'S PRIVATE PROPERTY, DOESN'T HAVE A VALID REGISTRATION OR, ANYTHING FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. OKAY, SO WE DON'T KNOW WHETHER THIS IS A VALID MINNESOTA TAG OR NO, NO. AND AGAIN, NO, NO, SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS OR ANYTHING THAT WOULD KIND OF LIKE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY THIS VEHICLE. IT JUST HAS THE VIN IS NOT ON IT. NO VIN. NO. YEAH. IT'S JUST VERBIAGE THAT INDICATES THAT IT IS A. ALL RIGHT, I IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS SOMETHING PRINTED UNDER. GIVE ME A MOMENT. I MEAN, I CAN SEE. PRIVATE PROPERTY. I CAN READ THAT, BUT I CAN'T READ WHAT'S BELOW IT. IF YOU GIVE ME ONE MOMENT. SO THE PAPER STATES PRIVATE PROPERTY. MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE CERTIFICATION. THIS VEHICLE IS PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNED BY AND HELD IN THE ASSUMED BUSINESS NAME OF THE REGISTERED PERSON IDENTIFIED BELOW. ASSUMED NAME. CERTIFICATE FILED ONE ONE 2023.ACTIVE AND IN GOOD STANDING. REGISTERED PERSON. OWNER THERE'S AN ID SLASH FILE NUMBER AND THEN ON THE BOTTOM OF THAT IT STATES PRIVATE BUSINESS PROPERTY TAX EXEMPT. DO NOT TOW. OKAY. I, I MEAN I DON'T THINK ANY OF THAT HAS ANY BEARING ON, ON YOU OR THE, ITS VALIDITY IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA BECAUSE EVEN IF THEY WERE BRINGING, A VEHICLE INTO THE STATE THAT'S 2023, THEY HAD 30 DAYS BASICALLY TO RE REGISTER IT, RE TAG IT. SO, YES. OKAY. AND, WHAT I CAN STATE IS, IS THESE VEHICLES HAVE BEEN IN THE EXACT LOCATION THAT THEY'VE BEEN PARKED, FOR QUITE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME, WHICH IS WHAT KIND OF LEADS US TO BELIEVE THAT THE VEHICLES MAY POSSIBLY BE INOPERABLE. AND IN THE PHYSICAL SENSE, NOT, IF THAT MAKES ANY SENSE. OKAY. SEEING AS THEY'VE BEEN THERE. ALL RIGHT. AND WHY DON'T YOU CONTINUE? BECAUSE. YES, I SEE NOBODY IS HERE ON BEHALF OF, MISS SANTOS OR MISTER SANTOS. YEAH. SO WITH THESE OBSERVATIONS, WE WENT AHEAD AND ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION. NOTICE OF HEARING, FOR, SECTION 91.32, WHICH HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT THREE, TH. NOTICE WAS SERVED, VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, REGULAR MAIL AND POSTING,
[00:10:13]
MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FOUR, INDICATING THE CERTIFIED MAIL, WAS SENT AS OF JUNE 11TH, AND THE POSTING ON JULY 2ND. AND MARK, BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT, FIVE IS THE MAIL RECEIPT AND EXHIBIT SIX IS THE DEPICTION OF THE POSTING ON THE PROPERTY. ALL RIGHT, DO YOU KNOW WHETHER THIS WAS ACTUALLY RECEIVED BY. MORELLO SANTOS? WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY. WE DID RECEIVE A PHONE CALL, FROM AN INDIVIDUAL CLAIMING TO BE A REPRESENTATIVE OF, MORELLO EXANTUS. BUT OUTSIDE OF THAT, THEY DID ACKNOWLEDGE THE FACT THAT THEY RECEIVED THE NOTICE AND WERE DISPUTING, THE FACT THAT THESE VEHICLES WERE, THEY BASICALLY CLAIMED THAT THE TAG WAS A VALID TAG AND THAT WE HAD NO RIGHT TO, ADDRESS THEM WITH THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION.BUT OUTSIDE OF THAT, I HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY OTHER, INQUIRY, AND WE DID NOT RECEIVE A RETURN RECEIPT ON THE CERTIFIED MAIL. ALL RIGHT, I'M LOOKING AT THE TRACKING NUMBER. THAT'S THAT'S ON THIS, SHEET, AND I AND I THINK MAYBE AS GOING FORWARD, IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA TO TRACK THAT AS FAR AS YOU CAN POSSIBLY TRACK IT SO YOU CAN TRACK IT AS DELIVERED. THEN I THEN I THINK YOU'VE REALLY GOT, NO QUESTION ABOUT GOOD SERVICE. OKAY RIGHT NOW ALL WE'VE GOT IS, SIGNATURE WAS REQUIRED AND ESTIMATED DELIVERY TIME IS 1 TO 3 DAYS. AND THAT'S A RECEIPT THAT IT WAS DEPOSITED IN THE MAIL. THAT'S NOT A RECEIPT. THAT THAT'S NOT THAT. IT WAS RECEIVED BY THE INDIVIDUAL. UNDERSTOOD ALL RIGHT. AND AT THE SAME TIME, YOU DID POST THE PROPERTY AND YOUR AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE IS GOOD. I'M LOOKING AT THE PHOTO OF THE POSTING, WHICH IS EXHIBIT SIX.
SO I DON'T I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH NOTICE. I JUST HAVE, I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH LOOKING AT, EXHIBIT FIVE AS A RECEIPT. UNDERSTOOD. OR FOR, THE MAIL. OKAY. I MEAN, IT'S IT JUST BASICALLY SAYS THAT, HERE'S YOUR TRACKING NUMBER, AND WE ESTIMATE IT'S GOING TO BE 1 TO 3 DAYS BEFORE IT'S DELIVERED. SO. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, GO AHEAD. ANY ANYTHING ELSE YOU NEED TO TELL ME ABOUT THIS, WELL, AT THIS TIME, WE'D WE'D LIKE TO, OBTAIN A FINAL ORDER MANDATING THE RESPONDENT, FACILITATE COMPLIANCE, WHETHER IT BE BY MEANS OF, REGISTERING THESE VEHICLES OR, REMOVING THEM, HAVING THEM REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY, WITHIN THE NEXT 30 DAYS, WHICH WILL REQUIRE, WHICH WILL BE TAKE US OUT TO THE AUGUST 20TH AS A FINAL HEARING DATE, AND SHOULD THEY FAIL TO COMPLY, WE WOULD LIKE TO, HAVE A FINE OF $100 A DAY OR PER DAY PER VIOLATION TO BE, LEVIED ON THE PROPERTY, WE ALSO HAVE A $150 ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATIVE FEE THAT WE'D LIKE TO BE RECORDED ON THE ORDER AS WELL. OKAY 150. I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO SET THE COMPLIANCE DATE FOR THE 16TH OF AUGUST. OKAY ALL RIGHT. SO, ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF MORRELL EXANTUS. AND I'M LOOKING OUT, SEEING NO ONE, WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT IT INTO EVIDENCE. THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH SIX. IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY, I WILL FIND THAT A VIOLATION OF SECTION 91.32 ABANDONED SALVAGE VEHICLES DOES EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. ACTUALLY, IT LOOKS LIKE BY VIRTUE OF THE THREE
[00:15:05]
VEHICLES THAT ARE THERE AND ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE, AUGUST 16TH, 2020 FOR FAILING TO FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE AND SINCE THERE ARE, I AM CORRECT, RIGHT. THERE'S THREE VEHICLES THERE. YEAH. OKAY. SO IT'S TIMES THREE. AND, FURTHER AWARD COSTS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE, ON OR BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE. OKAY THAT'S THAT ONE. ALL RIGHT. IN THE NEXT CASE IS THE NEXT ONE DOWN. IT'S, NUMBER 13 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER TWO. 4085. THE RESPONDENT IS CATHERINE TALLAMY. FOR THE PROPERTY AT 17 200 SOUTHWEST CHARLESTON STREET. AND, OFFICER PEREZ, YOU'RE ALSO GOING TO TESTIFY. AND THIS IS LIKEWISE AN ABANDONED VEHICLE CASE. YEAH. SO THIS, INVESTIGATION WAS ALSO INITIATED PROACTIVELY BY OUR DEPARTMENT ON JUNE 7TH OF 2024, WITH REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY AT 17200 SOUTHWEST CHARLESTON STREET, WE'VE IDENTIFIED THE OWNER AS MISS CATHERINE TO SOME, WHICH HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU ON THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORD AS EXHIBIT ONE. UPON RESPONDING TO THE PROPERTY, WE OBSERVED A VEHICLE THAT, APPEARED TO BE IN AN INOPERABLE STATE PARKED ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY JUST OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERT, IF YOU LOOK AT EXHIBIT TWO, THIS, THERE ARE TWO DEPICTIONS THERE OF THE OBSERVATIONS THAT WERE MADE AT THAT TIME, THE VEHICLE IS A SILVER, SEDAN, AND THERE IS A TAG. PAPER TAG ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE VEHICLE. AGAIN, SIMILAR TO THE LAST CASE, INDICATING THAT THE VEHICLE IS PRIVATE PROPERTY. AND A CERTIFICATION FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA THAT HAS A ID SLASH FILE NUMBER, AND INDICATING THAT IT IS A PRIVATE, PRIVATE BUSINESS, PROPERTY OF A PRIVATE BUSINESS. SO, AGAIN, AS WE ESTABLISHED IN THE LAST CASE, THE RESPONDENT, HAS NOT ATTAINED A, VALID FLORIDA TAG, AND REGISTRATION FOR THE VEHICLE, WHICH AT THIS POINT WOULD, INDICATE THAT IT IS INOPERABLE, SO WITH THESE OBSERVATIONS, WE WENT FORWARD WITH A NOTICE OF VIOLATION, NOTICE OF HEARING, DOCUMENTING VIOLATIONS ON THEIR 91.32 FOR ABANDONED SALVAGE OR JUNK PROPERTY. THE NOTICE WAS SERVED TO THE RESPONDENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, REGULAR MAIL AND POSTING THE CERTIFIED MAIL WAS SENT ON JUNE 11TH, 2024, AND THE POSTING WAS CONDUCTED ON JULY 2ND OF 2024. MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE INDICATING OR REFLECTING THESE DATES HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FOUR, AND THE MAIL RECEIPT, FOR THE CERTIFIED MAILING HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FIVE. AND A DEPICTION OF MY POSTING HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT SIX. OKAY. WITH THESE. WITH THIS, WE'D LIKE TO, AGAIN, GO FORWARD WITH A, FINAL ORDER MANDATING THAT THE RESPONDENT COMPLY, ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF AUGUST 16TH, 2024, SHOULD THEY FAIL TO COMPLY, WE WOULD LIKE THERE TO BE A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY PER VIOLATION TO BE LEVIED. AND WE WOULD ALSO LIKE A, COST, AN ADMINISTRATIVE COST OF $150 TO BE RECORDED ON THE ORDER AS WEL. ALL RIGHT. LOOKING OUT, ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF CATHERINE TELLS ME, SEEING NO ONE. WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT IN EVIDENCE THE TOWN OF THE[00:20:08]
VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH SIX. IN THIS CASE. NOW, THIS CASE IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN THE PRIOR CASE, IN THAT THE PROPERTY THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, THE VEHICLE IN QUESTION IS ACTUALLY ON THE RIGHT OF WAY. YES SIR. AND SO IT COULD BE IT COULD BE TOWED BASICALLY BY THE VILLAGE IF YOU WANTED TO GO THROUGH THAT ADDED EXPENSE. BUT. I ACTUALLY MIGHT EVEN CONTACT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE FOR THAT PROCESS BECAUSE THERE IS A STATUTORY PROCESS FOR THIS. ALL RIGHT. BUT WITHOUT THAT, YOU HAVE THE SAME ISSUE WITH YOUR EXHIBIT NUMBER FIVE, WHERE THE, THE EXHIBIT IS BASICALLY A NOTIFICATION OF A TRACKING NUMBER, AND THE ESTIMATED DELIVERY IS GOING TO BE BETWEEN ONE AND THREE DAYS. SO, PAUL, I'D LIKE TO STATE. I BELIEVE THERE'S, ARE YOU HERE FOR THE TO, CATHERINE CATHERINE TO LUCEM. OKAY. I BELIEVE THIS IS A REPRESENTATIVE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT. OH OKAY. WELL, I BASICALLY I'VE HEARD THE CASE, YOU'RE LATE AND SO I'VE HEARD THE CASE, AND THE ONE PRIOR TO IT. AS A MATTER OF FACT, AND FOUND THAT IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE. AND SO I AND I'M, I'M, I GUESS I'M HAPPY TO AT LEAST EXPLAIN MY DECISION BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE, THE MINNESOTA, FILING, WHATEVER THAT THAT HAPPENED TO BE THAT DECLARES THIS PRIVATE PROPERTY IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, IS A LITTLE IS LOOKED AT DIFFERENTLY IN FLORIDA. AS I THINK YOU MISUNDERSTAND, YOU YOU COME TELL ME EXACTLY WHAT THE SITUATION IS. IF YOU'LL RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, I'LL. YEAH, UNDER UNDER MY LAWS. I CAN'T SWEAR, I CAN'T, I CAN'T SWEAR, CAN'T SWEAR. CAN YOU AFFIRM? YOU CAN AFFIRM. YOU CAN TELL ME THAT YOU'RE GOING TO TELL ME THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH. AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. YEAH, BUT I'M NOT ALLOWED TO SWEAR, OKAY? WE'RE NOT GOING TO SWEAR THE PROPERTY. COME ON UP HERE, BEFORE WE HANG ON, HANG ON. YOU'RE NOT SWEARING, BUT I'M GOING TO ASK YOU, DO YOU AGREE? DO YOU AFFIRM THAT YOU'RE GOING TO TELL ME THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? OKAY, BEFORE WE GET STARTED, IS THAT A YES OR A NO BEFORE WE GET STARTED? THIS IS NOT A GENERAL, APPEARANCE OR VISITATION. IT'S A SPECIAL VISITATION. AND THE NAMES THAT HAS BEEN MENTIONED ON HERE IS UNDER SPECIAL DEPOSIT ON THE FOR OUR CONSIDERATION FOR FUTURE.WHAT IS YOUR NAME, SIR? MY ALL RIGHT. WHAT IS YOUR NAME? MY NAME IS UNDER SPECIAL DEPOSIT FOR MY. FOR CONSIDERATION FOR MY INTEREST. YOU HAVE NO NAME AND YOU WON'T AGREE TO TELL THE TRUTH. OKAY THE NAME THAT YOU THE NAME SINCE I DON'T I SAID IS MY NAME IS UNDER SPECIAL DEPOSIT. MY NAME IS JOSEPH. FROM THE TRIBE OF ALEXIS. AND I'M HERE ON BEHALF FOR CATHERINE.
SO. AND THEN I ALSO WHAT I DID WAS I HAD SOME COUPLE NOTICE. DO YOU HAVE ANY. I HAVE A COUPLE NOTICE THAT I SON IN FOR CIVILIAN DUE PROCESS. I ASKED THAT IN IN OKAY. YES I ASKED FOR CIVILIAN DUE PROCESS. AND I ACTUALLY HAD SOME DOUBT A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT NOTICE THAT HASN'T BEEN RESPONDED TO. AND I WANT TO KNOW BEFORE WE EVEN GET STARTED WITH THAT, CAN YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING, IS, IS THE, ARE YOU OR ANYBODY ELSE IN THE, IN THE, WILLING TO GO AHEAD AND VERIFY THE INFORMATION AND PROVIDE ME BECAUSE I STILL NEED LICENSE ASSURANCE AND, YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? COMMERCIAL LIABILITY BEFORE WE EVEN GET STARTED, I'M OUT HERE ON GENERAL, BUT I DO BEFORE WE EVEN GET STARTED, BEFORE I GET DAMAGED. I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE LICENSE, INSURANCE AND COMMERCIAL LIABILITY. WHO'S GOING TO. AND I NEED TO KNOW THE CLAIM. I STILL I WAS ASKING FOR THE CLAIM. I STILL HAVEN'T GOT THE CLAIM. I NEED TO BE ABLE TO GET THAT CLAIM. LET ME EXPLAIN SOMETHING TO YOU IN ORDER FOR YOU TO MAKE AN APPEARANCE. YOU NEED TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF. AND I NEED TO KNOW WHAT YOUR RELATIONSHIP IS TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND TO THE PROPERTY
[00:25:07]
YOU'RE CLAIMING TO HAVE AN INTEREST IN. YES, THE PROPERTY THAT YOU THAT YOU'RE INTERESTED IN IS IN THE TRUST. HERE'S THE TRUST. DOES IT IDENTIFY THE PROPERTY? YES EACH ONE OF THEM IDENTIFIES EACH PROPERTY. OKAY SO ALL OF THEM HAVE HAVE DIFFERENT. SO NOW THE PROBLEM THAT WE'RE HAVING HERE IS THIS, THAT THE PLACES THAT YOU'RE GOING TO, IT'S NOT COMMERCIAL.AND I DON'T KNOW AGAIN THIS IT'S BEEN VAGUE BECAUSE MOST OF THE LANGUAGES THAT, THAT YOU'RE USING IS FICTITIOUS BECAUSE I DON'T I DON'T I DON'T UNDERSTAND, LEGALESE. I'M AN IDIOT TO IT LEGALLY. I DON'T I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT LEGALESE IS. SO IT HAS TO BE AGAIN, I NEED A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THAT MEANS. AND IF I CAN, I NEED THE IMPROPER GRAMMAR. IT'S NOT IMPROPER GRAMMAR. AND I NEE, I NEED, I NEED THAT TO BE IN PROPER GRAMMAR. SO THAT WAY WE CAN GO AHEAD AND PROCEED. SO NOW WHAT HAPPENED IS WE GOT EVIDENCE THAT ONE THAT, MAIL FRAUD HAS BEEN COMMITTED BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN SENT INTO THE MAIL WITH A FICTITIOUS NAME. NOW, I'M ASKIN, WHO IS WHO IS Y'ALL TRYING TO CONTACT? IS IT THE WHAT THE. I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT YOU'RE TRYING TO CONTACT A MAN OR A PERSON. THE PERSON HAS TWO DIFFERENT MEN. I'M ASKING, SO WHAT I NEED TO KNOW IS WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF PERSON? WHAT ARE WHAT ARE Y'ALL SAYING? BECAUSE PERSON HAS TWO DEFINITIONS I NEED TO I NEED TO KNOW I'M NOT. I'M NOT I'M CONFUSED. I'M, YOU KNOW, OKAY. THE TOWN, THE VILLAGE HAS ACTUALLY GONE AGAINST THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN OF THE PROPERTY, THE REAL PROPERTY WHERE THE VEHICLES ARE LOCATED.
AND SO IN THIS CASE, THERE'S, CATHERINE TELLS ME AND, FOR THE PROPERTY AT 17 200 SOUTHWEST CHARLESTON STREET AND THE PRIOR CASE WAS, FOR MORRELL XANTHUS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 17 189 SOUTHWEST CHARLESTON STREET. SO IT'S PRETTY SIMPLE. THERE'S NOT ANYTHING MAGICAL ABOUT ANY OF THAT, THE VEHICLES WERE FOUND ON THAT PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND, THE VEHICLES IN THE CODE, IT'S PRETTY PRETTY MUCH ENGLISH. YEAH. SO THIS IS THE PROBLEM. I SEE THE THING IS, THIS IS WHY I SAY IT'S FICTITIOUS. LANGUAGE IS JUST IT'S THE PROBLEM UNDER TITLE 18. 1341, IT SAYS THAT IT CAN'T IT CAN'T BE. IT CAN'T BE VAGUE. WHAT WHAT ARE Y'ALL EXPLAINING INTO? THE THING IS, IT'S NOT. IT'S NOT IDEAL. SO MY QUESTION IS YOU GOT IT ALL. CAPITAL LETTERS AND STUFF LIKE I'M ASKING YOU WHO YOU WHO YOU SPEAKING TO. ARE YOU SPEAKING TO A PERSON OR YOU ARE YOU SPEAKING TO A MAN OR A WOMAN? WHICH ONE? BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT. THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE THE PROBLEM AT. AND THEN NOW, ACTUALLY NOW THE THING IS THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE NOT APPEARED. SO I DON'T KNOW WHO YOU ARE. OH, YES. AND I'M ABOUT TO END THIS BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHO YOU ARE. I HAVE MY ANSWER.
WHAT YOUR INTEREST IS. I HAVE MY PASSPORT HERE, AND I HAVE I'M GOING TO ASK THE DEPUTY TO COME UP, AND YOU CAN GIVE THE PASSPORT TO THE DEPUTY. HOLD ON ONE SECOND.
SHALL I GIVE YOU ALL THE DOCUMENTS THAT YOU NEED? LIKE I SAID, I'M. I'M NOT HERE TO DO ANY COMPLAINING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. I JUST NEED TO KNOW HOW CAN I MAKE A CLAIM? I NEED THE INSURANCE POLICIES. I NEED LICENSE, INSURANCE. BECAUSE AGAIN, IF I'M NOT QUITE SURE IN THE CONSTITUTION IT SAYS THAT, YOU KNOW, NO GOVERNMENT WILL BE, INSTITUTE INSTITUTED. AND, YOU KNOW, PRIVATE PROPERTY AND CONTRACTS. SO I NEED TO I NEED TO KNOW WHAT THE NATURE OF THE FACTS. I NEED TO KNOW WHAT THE CLAIM IS. IF SOMEBODY'S PUTTING THE CLAIM IN, I NEED TO KNOW.
THEY NEED TO PUT IT IN THEIR REAL NAME. I DID PROVIDE YOU WITH MULTIPLE WITH THIS PAPER.
[00:30:14]
THAT YOU WILL NEED THAT.ALL RIGHT. HERE'S MY NOTES. IS A CIVILIAN DUE PROCESS? NO. I WANTED TO SEE HIS PASSPORT. THE PASSPORT? OKAY. YEAH YEAH. ALL THIS STUFF NEEDS TO GO TOGETHER BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY WAY.
ALL RIGHT, SO, MR. ALEXIS. OKAY. WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN, LET'S START WITH THE GILLESPIE CASE.
HOW DO YOU RELATE TO. LET'S SEE WHAT YOU GOT. LET'S SEE.
OKAY. THIS PURPORTS TO BE A POWER OF ATTORNEY, AND IT INDICATES IN THE TYPING THAT I, KATHERINE GILLESPIE. HEREBY APPOINTS JOSEPH ALEXIS AS, ATTORNEY. IN FACT, THE ONLY PROBLEM WITH IT IS THAT IT'S NOT DATED, AND IT'S NOT SIGNED BY KATHERINE GILLESPIE. AND SO IT'S NOT A VALID, POWER OF ATTORNEY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, I'M GOING TO CONTINUE WITH MY RULING. HERE'S YOUR HERE'S YOUR PASSPORT. THIS IS WHAT MY MOM WANTED TO GET THIS FOR LIABILITY FOR, YOU KNOW, FOR LIABILITY.
NO. I'M GOOD. THANKS. ALL RIGHT. SO, NOTWITHSTANDING MR. ALEXIS IS, TESTIMONY AND CONTRIBUTIONS.
I'M GOING TO FIND THAT, VIOLATION, OF SECTION 91.32, ABANDONED VEHICLE. DOES EXIST ON THE TALISMAN PROPERTY AND ORDER COMPLIANCE ORDER COMPLIANCE ORDER BEFORE, AUGUST 16TH, 2024.
FAILING WHICH A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND I'M FURTHER GOING TO
[00:35:03]
AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE, ON OR BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE. SO MISS TALISMAN HAS UNTIL, NEXT MONTH, ANOTHER, WHATEVER IT IS, 29, 30 DAYS TO COMPLY BY EITHER PROPERLY TAGGING THE VEHICLES, THEY'VE BEEN IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE REGISTERED HERE ACCORDING TO FLORIDA LAW. AND, OR OR THEY CAN BE MOVED OF COURSE. AND REMOVED FROM THE TALISMAN PROPERTY OR IN THIS CASE, THE OTHER PROPERTY AS WELL. SO OKAY, SO ONE PROBLEM. ONE, YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE CARS ARE ABANDONED. WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THAT THE CARS ABANDONED? NUMBER TWO THEY'RE NOT PROPERLY REGISTERED. I LET YOU SPEAK AND I SPEAK. SO NUMBER TWO IS NOW YOU'RE SAYING THAT MY PROPERTY IS LABELED AS AS WHAT? COMMERCIAL FOR COMMERCIAL USE? OR ARE YOU. WHAT ARE YOU SAYING? BECAUSE AGAIN IT'S IN TRUST PROPERTY. I JUST SHOWED YOU ANY TRUST PROPERTY AS TO WHAT THE PROPERTY IS. SO NOW SO NOW MY QUESTION IS BEFORE WE EVEN GET I SHOULD HAVE BEEN ASKING THIS FROM THE BEGINNING. DO YOU HAVE A PROPER OATH? HAVE I BEEN APPOINTED AS MAGISTRATE? YES.YOU HAVE A PROPER OATH. I'M NOT SURE I EVEN UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. I'M ASKING YOU.
DO YOU HAVE A PROPER OATH THAT YOU CAN PROVIDE ME CERTIFIED? CAN YOU PROVIDE ME WITH THAT? DO YOU HAVE A BOND? CAN YOU PROVIDE ME WITH THAT? I DON'T NEED TO BE BONDED. I'VE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. SO BASICALLY. NO NO OATH OF OFFICE. SO BASICALLY ALL THESE RULES AND THE RULES THAT YOU'RE IMPLEMENTING RIGHT NOW IS PRETTY MUCH WITHOUT AN OATH. RIGHT? I'VE BEEN APPOINTED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. SO IS ANYBODY ELSE IN THIS ROOM. IS ANYBODY ELSE IN THIS ROOM HAS AN OATH OF OFFICE BECAUSE IN ORDER FOR THIS ORDER, FOR THIS TO FUNCTION, IT HAS TO BE BONDED WITH WITH THE LICENSE. IT HAS TO BE BONDED. YEAH. OKAY I THINK WE'RE DONE.
YOU SURE? YEAH. WE'RE DONE. THANK YOU. OKAY. CAN I GET YOUR NAME FOR THE. FOR THE RECORD? YES. OF COURSE, IT'S PAUL NICOLETTI, PAUL NICOLETTI, AND, I, THEY DON'T HAVE A NAME TAG OUT TODAY, SO. CAN I GET YOUR NAME? DEPUTY LUCAS? CAN I GET YOUR BADGE NUMBER FIVE, FIVE, EIGHT. DO YOU HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER? GREAT. CAN I GET YOUR NAME? STEVEN. ALONZO RAMIREZ, CAN I? YOU HAVE A YOU HAVE A OATH OF OFFICE. I DON'T EVEN KNOW. WHAT. DO YOU HAVE A BADGE NUMBER? 2020 403. DO YOU HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER? NO DO YOU HAVE BOND INSURANCE, A LICENSE? I'M NOT GOING TO ANSWER THAT. OKAY. CAN YOU, SIR, CAN YOU. WHAT'S YOUR WHAT'S YOUR NAME, SIR? DEPUTY. WE'RE DONE SIR. WE'RE DONE. YEAH. SO I MEAN I STILL IT'S MY RIGHT. RIGHT. SO YOU VIOLATE MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. I'M ASKING I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF EVERYBODY'S BONDED HERE. SO I'M ASKING I'M, I DON'T I DON'T HAVE A I DON'T HAVE A RIGHT. I'M HAVING A RIGHT TO ASK EVERYBODY IF THEIR INSURANCE BOND RIGHT WAS TO APPEAR ON THE SPECIAL DEPOSIT. I TOLD YOU ON THE SPECIAL VISITATION. THIS IS NOT GENERAL. I'M DONE, I'M DONE. THANK YOU. THE ORDER IS. CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE ME WITH YOUR NAME, SIR? PLEASE WE'RE DONE HERE. PLEASE REMOVE YOURSELF.
NOBODY HAS AN OATH OF OFFICE OR INSURANCE. ATTORNEY THANK YOU. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SORRY, NEXT CASE IS THE, HARDY CASE. IT'S NUMBER 14 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S 20 4-086, DANA FE HARDY AND DREW ANTHONY HARDY FOR THE PROPERTY AT 15 375 SOUTHWEST. MYRTLE DRIVE. AND, OFFICER PEREZ, YOU'RE GOING TO TESTIFY? YES, SIR, SO THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY BY OUR DEPARTMENT ON JUNE 7TH, 2024. WITH REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY AT 15375 SOUTHWEST MYRTLE DRIVE, THE OWNERS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS, MISS DANA FAYE HARDY AND MR. DREW ANTHONY HARDY, WHICH HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU ON THE PROPERTY. MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORD AS EXHIBIT ONE UPON, VISITING THE SITE, WE, OBSERVED AN ASSORTMENT OF, BOATS BEING MAINTAINED ON THE PROPERTY, AT
[00:40:08]
THE TIME OF OUR VISIT, THERE WERE A TOTAL OF THREE BOATS. THAT WERE BEING MAINTAINED ALONG THE FAR, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE FAR SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LOT, IF YOU LOOK IN EXHIBIT TWO, YOU'LL SEE A DEPICTION OF THESE BOATS. BEING MAINTAINED ON THE LOT. AND WHAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE BOTTOM DEPICTION THERE WAS, THIS IS AN AERIAL OF THE, OF THE PROPERTY. THE ASTERISK THAT I PUT THERE, OR CIRCLE, PER SE, MARKING THE LOCATION, WAS REALLY MEANT TO BE. IT LOOKS LIKE IT JUST MIGHT HAVE HAD A BIT OF AN ERROR THERE WHEN WE CONVERTED THE DOCUMENT TO PDF, BUT IT SHOULD BE INDICATING ALONG THE FAR, SOUTHEAST CORNER IS WHERE WE MADE THAT OBSERVATION, OF THE OF THESE BOATS BEING MAINTAINED THERE. OKAY. SO THAT'S TRUE. THE IF THE PHOTO IS LOOKING NORTH SO THAT IT'S DOWN IN THIS CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. YES, SIR. YES, SIR.OKAY. YES, SIR. SO THE BOTTOM RIGHT. BOTTOM RIGHT SIDE OF THE DEPICTION OF THE AERIAL. YES, SIR. OKAY. AND AGAIN, WHEN WE VISITED THE SITE, NONE OF THE TRAILERS HAD, TAGS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT JUST APPEARED AS IF, THOUGH THEY WERE JUST MAINTAINING THE BOATS THERE ON THE PROPERTY, WITH THIS, WE WENT FORWARD WITH A NOTICE OF VIOLATION FOR SECTION THREE, DASH 5.8, STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AND BOATS, REALLY WITH A, INDICATION THAT THE SEEING AS THE LOT IS, HAS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME UNDER THIS, REGULATION, THERE ARE ONLY PERMITTED, TO HAVE UP TO ONE RV AND ONE BOAT. ON THE PROPERTY AT ANY TIME, AND WHICH SHOULD BE, STORED, WITH A BUFFER, BE IT A PRIVACY FENCE, MASONRY WALL, TREES OR SHRUBS OF, SIX FEET IN HEIGHT. OKAY WITH THIS, WE, WE DID SERVE THIS NOTICE OF VIOLATION VIA CERTIFIED MAIL AND REGULAR MAIL, AS OF JUNE 11TH, 2024, MY, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FOUR, INDICATING THE MAIL OUT ON JUNE 11TH, 2024, AND THE POSTING ON JULY 2ND OF 2024, IN EXHIBIT FIVE IS A, COPY OF THE MAIL RECEIPT, AND EXHIBIT SIX IS A DEPICTION OF THE POSTING ON THE SITE. NOW WE DID REVISIT THE SITE, AS OF, JUST YESTERDAY, JULY 15TH, 2024.
SINCE THEN, AND I'VE ATTACHED THIS AS EXHIBIT, 77A YOU HAVE A DEPICTION OF ONE BOAT THAT'S BEEN RELOCATED TO THE DRIVEWAY, AND THEN ALONG THE OPPOSITE END OF THE DRIVEWAY, GOING INTO THE BOTTOM DEPICTION OF TWO A THERE'S ANOTHER TWO BOATS THERE. AND IF WE GO INTO SEVEN B, IT WAS HARD TO GET IT FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY. THIS IS A DEPICTION I TOOK FROM THE ROAD, BUT ALONG THE BACKSIDE OF THE PROPERTY THERE WERE ANOTHER THREE BOATS ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE, OF THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME. ALL RIGHT. SO THE REALLY THE CONCERN HERE IS WE'RE NOT TRYING TO HAVE A BOAT YARD OR A BOAT STORAGE YARD ON A SINGLE FAMILY. PROPERTY, THEY THEY DO NOT HAVE THE, ZONING DISTRICT. THEY'RE NOT WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT THAT PERMITS, BOAT YARD STORAGE, I HAVEN'T PERSONALLY BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE RESPONDENT. THEY DID MANAGE TO, GET IN CONTACT WITH, SOME OF THE SUPERIORS HERE WITHIN THE VILLAGE. AND THE ONLY THING I'VE RECEIVED THUS FAR IS THAT THEY INDICATED THEY NEEDED TO REMOVE THEIR BOATS FROM A LOCAL MARINA.
AND THAT THEY'VE BEEN RELOCATED TO THEIR PROPERTY, SO AT ONE AT ONE TIME, THEY DID HAVE ALL
[00:45:04]
THESE BOATS AT A MARINA HERE LOCALLY WITHIN TOWN, BUT THEY, FOR WHATEVER REASON, WERE REQUIRED TO RELOCATE THEM. OKAY. SO AT THIS POINT, WHAT WE'D LIKE TO OBTAIN IS A, A FINAL ORDER MANDATING COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE, THE NEXT HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 20TH, 2024. WE'D LIKE THE RESPONDENT TO EITHER OR TO HAVE THE BOATS REMOVED AND CONFORM TO THE REGULATION OF MAINTAINING ONE OF THESE, RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AT THE PROPERTY AT ANY TIME, AT ANY GIVEN TIME, IF THEY FAIL TO COMPLY WITHIN THE TIME ALLOTTED, WE'D LIKE THERE TO BE A FINE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY PER VIOLATION TO BE LEVIED, AND WE'D ALSO LIKE THERE TO BE AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE OF $150 TO BE RECORDED ON THE ON THE ORDER. ALL RIGHT, AGAIN, I'M JUST MAKING AN OBSERVATION. YOUR EXHIBIT FIVE. YES, SIR. HAS THE SAME DEFECT AS FAR AS THE POSTAL SERVICE. YES, SIR. NOTICE THAT IT'S GOT A TRACKING NUMBER AND ESTIMATED DELIVERY TIME, BUT, EXHIBIT SIX, TAKES CARE OF THE ISSUE. SO BY POSTING. ALL RIGHT, SO, WITHOUT OBJECTION, ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF THE HARDYS, DANA FAY OR DREW ANTHONY SEEING NO ONE, I WILL, ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS, ONE THROUGH SEVEN B IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY, YOU'LL FIND THAT VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED TO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY IN ORDER OF COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 16TH, 2024. FAILING WHICH YOU'LL FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE AND FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE, ON OR BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE. IN THIS CASE, AND. THAT'S ORDERED. OKAY ALL RIGHT. THE NEXT THREE CASES ARE COMPLIED. THE NEXT CASE IS NUMBER 18 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 24090. AND IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S, LEONARDO MARTINEZ BAHENA FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 637 SOUTHWEST MARTIN AVENUE. AND OFFICER ALONSO, THIS IS YOUR CASE. SO THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY ON, JUNE 6TH, THE CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14637 SOUTHWEST MARTIN AVE, ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY, APPRAISER'S PROPERTY OWNER IS LEONARDO MARTINEZ MARTINEZ. BAHENA AS YOU SEE ON EXHIBIT ONE ON JUNE SIX, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY. AT THE TIME, I OBSERVED THE FOLLOWING CODE VIOLATIONS, WHICH WOULD BE SECTION 67.2 OH ONE, A AND B WITH, TALL GRASS AND WEEDS.ALSO, A LOT OF TRASH AND DEBRIS, LET ME LET ME JUST STOP YOU FOR A SECOND, YOU'RE YOU'RE SAYING JUNE SIXTH, BUT I'M LOOKING AT WHAT'S MARKED AS TWO A AND THEN LOOKING AT THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION. IT SAYS JUNE 10TH. SO THAT'S, OUT THERE ON THE SIXTH. SO I WAS OUT THERE ON THE SIXTH.
I TOOK MY PICTURES ON THAT DAY. BUT WHEN I DID THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND ALL THE EVIDENCE, I DID IT ON THE 10TH. TERRIFIC. OKAY. GOT IT. IT HAD TALL GRASS. IF YOU WERE TO SEE ON EXHIBIT TWO, B OR C, THERE WAS, IN THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, THERE'S A JUST A TIRE, A RIM WITH TALL WEEDS TOWARDS THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY. THERE'S A LOT OF, CHAIR BOTTLES, CONTAINERS JUST LAID, SCATTERED ACROSS. ALSO WITH, SOME CAGES IN THE BACK WITH CHICKENS AND ROOSTERS.
OKAY. SO KIND OF WORKING BACKWARDS. I'M LOOKING AT TWO. SEE, I SEE THE TIRE LEANING AGAINST THE EUREKA PALM, AND THEN, 2BI SEE. CHAIRS AND FURNITURE, KIND OF UPSIDE DOWN.
AND THAT JUST SCATTERED ALL THROUGH THE BACK. OKAY. AND THEN TWO, 2AI SEE A LADDER AND CHAIRS
[00:50:06]
OR LOOKS ALMOST LIKE A BARREL OR SOMETHING IN THE BACK THERE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I'M WITH YOU AND EXHIBIT TWO D WILL SHOW, SOME CHICKENS JUST IN THE FRONT YARD, BUT ALSO ON THE BACK. I COULD NOT GET A CLEAR PICTURE OF WITH THE PHONE FROM THE, FROM THE ROADWAY OF THE OF CHICKENS BEING IN CAGES IN THE BACK. I GOT CHICKENS, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND THAT WAS FOR, ALSO SECTION THREE, DASH 5.2 FOR ANIMAL AND LIVESTOCK. OKAY UPON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION ON JUNE 10TH FOR THE HEARING FOR JULY 16TH. AND IN THE NOTICE, THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN TO JUNE 21ST TO COME IN COMPLIANCE. I DID NOT HAVE NO CONTACT WITH THE RESPONDENT, NO ONE'S CALLED. I ALSO POSTED ON THE PROPERTY OR ON THE MAILBOX DUE TO THE FACT THAT THEY HAD A LOOSE DOG IN FRONT. AND AS I TRIED TO APPROACH THE PROPERTY, THE DOG GOT A LITTLE AGGRESSIVE.SO I DECIDED TO JUST POST ON THE MAILBOX, WHICH YOU WOULD SEE IN EXHIBIT SIX FOR THE POSTING. ALL RIGHT. AND I ALSO DID, THE REINSPECTION YESTERDAY, JUNE, JULY 15TH. AT THE TIME WHERE THEY HAVE NOT CHANGED NOR COME INTO ANY TYPE OF COMPLIANCE. OKAY. SO AS OF YESTERDAY, ALL OF THE VIOLATIONS STILL EXIST. YES. OKAY. AND LET ME SEE. ALL RIGHT. BASED ON MY TESTIMONY, EVIDENCE, I DO REQUEST THAT THE RESPONDENTS COME TO COMPLIANCE BY AUGUST 16TH. SO I WOULD LIKE TO ISSUE A FINAL ORDER. AND ALSO, REQUIRE THAT THE RESPONDENT PAY AN AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY. THEREAFTER ALSO, THAT THE VILLAGE HAS INQUIRED A REASONABLE AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF 150. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF LEONARDO MARTINEZ BAHENA? CASE NUMBER 24090, SEEING NO ONE. WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH SIX. IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON THE EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY, I'LL FIND THAT VIOLATIONS AS CHARGED DO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY AND ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 16TH, 2024. FAILING WHICH A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE, AND FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE, ON OR BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE. IN THIS CAS.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE. OKAY LOOKING AT THE NEXT PAGE, THE TOP ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE CASES HAVE COMPLIED. SO NOW WE'RE AT NUMBER 24 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 24096. IT'S, PROPERTIES OWNED BY PERNELL J. AND MARY A JONES. AND THE PROPERTY IS 14 854 SOUTHWEST, 169TH AVENUE. AND OFFICER PEREZ, WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. SO THIS, CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY BY OUR DEPARTMENT ON JUNE 7TH, 2024 WITH REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY AT 14854 SOUTHWEST 169TH AVENUE, THE PROPERTY OWNERS, AS YOU STATED, HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS PERNELL J. JONES AND MARY A JONES, WHICH HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU ON THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORD AS EXHIBIT ONE. UPON RESPONDING TO THE PROPERTY ON JUNE 7TH, 2024, WE OBSERVED, A COUPLE VIOLATIONS. WE HAVE VIOLATIONS UNDER 91-32, ABANDONED SALVAGE AND JUNK PROPERTY AND SECTION 67. 201B FOR TRASH ON EXHIBIT TWO. YOU'LL SEE THE TOP IMAGE IS A DEPICTION OF THE FRONT END OF THE PROPERTY WHERE THERE IS A
[00:55:09]
REALLY SET OF FOUR TIRES, THAT ARE BEING MAINTAINED THERE. AS WELL AS SOME SEATING AREA JUST OUTSIDE OF THE GARAGE. NOW, I, I'M NOT ENTIRELY SURE IF THIS IS IF THIS HAS BEEN, YOU KNOW, IF IT'S DAMAGED OR WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE WITH IT. BUT, AS IT STANDS, WE'VE IDENTIFIED THE TIRES AS THE TRASH AND DEBRIS. AND THEN ALONG THE FAR NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, THERE IS A, DARK GRAY SEDAN, THAT'S IN AN INOPERABLE STATE. UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE'S A TAG. BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE DEPICTION, PARTICULARLY ON THE BOTTOM END, YOU'LL SEE THAT THE TIRES ARE, SIGNIFICANTLY FLAT AND KIND OF GROWN INTO OR KIND OF WORN DOWN INTO THE ACTUAL DIRT, OKAY. AND IT LOOKS AT LIKE AT SOME POINT THEY MADE AN EFFORT TO TRY TO COVER THE VEHICLE WITH A TARP. BUT, THE TARP IS NOW KIND OF RIPPED UP, AND YOU SEE IT KIND OF LAYING OFF ACROSS THE BACKSIDE OF THE VEHICLE. OKAY, I DO SO WITH, WITH THESE OBSERVATIONS, WE WENT FORWARD WITH THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOTICE OF HEARING. DOCUMENTING THE VIOLATIONS AS OBSERVED ON THE PROPERTY. THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION WAS SERVED, TO THE RESPONDENT VIA CERTIFIED REGULAR MAIL AND POSTING MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. DOCUMENTING THE MAIL. RECEIPT ON JUNE 11TH, 2024. AND THE. AND THE POSTING ON JULY 2ND OF 2024 HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FOUR. OKAY FORGIVE ME. FORGIVE ME ONE MOMENT. OKAY. AND THEN THE. I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.AND THEN GOING INTO EXHIBIT FIVE IS A IS THE COPY OF MY MAIL RECEIPT, DOCUMENTING THE MAIL OUT ON JUNE 11TH, 2024 AND THE POSTING ON JULY SECOND OF 2024. OKAY AT THIS TIME, WE DID CONDUCT A FOLLOW UP INSPECTION ON JULY 15TH, WE DIDN'T DOCUMENT ANY PHOTOS AT THAT TIME, BUT I CAN ATTEST TO THE FACT THAT THE VIOLATIONS THAT WERE INITIALLY RECORDED STILL DO EXIST ON THE SITE. OKAY. WHEN WAS YOUR LAST OBSERVATION, JULY 15TH. 15TH. OKAY. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. SO, OKAY.
GO AHEAD, SO AT THIS TIME, WE'D ASK THAT A FINAL ORDER. BE ISSUED, MANDATING COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE, THE NEXT HEARING, OF AUGUST 20TH, 2024, SHOULD THE RESPONDENT FAIL TO COMPLY, WE'D LIKE THERE TO BE A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY PER VIOLATION TO BE LEVIED, AND WE'D, ALSO LIKE AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE OF $150 TO BE RECORDED ON THE ORDER. AT THIS TIME, THAT'LL CONCLUDE MY, MY PRESENTATION. SO, MY OBSERVATION IS THE SAME FOR YOUR EXHIBIT FIVE REGARDING THE NOTICE FROM THE POSTAL SERVICE, PROVIDES A TRACKING NUMBER AND ESTIMATED TIME FOR DELIVERY. THAT'S ALL. BUT THAT SECURED BY EXHIBIT SIX, WHICH IS A POSTING. ALL RIGHT, SO, ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF THE JONESES, PERNELL AND MARY JONES, SEEING NO ONE. WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT INTO EVIDENCE THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH SIX. IN THIS CASE, BASED UPON, THOSE EXHIBITS AND YOUR TESTIMONY, I'LL FIND THAT VIOLATION OF, AS CHARGE TO EXIST ON THE PROPERTY AND ORDER COMPLIANCE ORDER BEFORE AUGUST 16TH, 2024. FAILING WHICH A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER VIOLATION PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND I'LL FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE, ON OR BEFORE THE TIME SET FOR COMPLIANCE. IN THIS CASE. OKAY THE NEXT ONE IS THE NEXT CASE, NUMBER 25 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S 20 CASE NUMBER 24,
[01:00:13]
DASH 097. THE RESPONDENT IS LEXON OR AUGUST. AUGUST FOR THE PROPERTY AT 1505 EIGHT SOUTHWEST 1/73 AVENUE. AND OFFICER PEREZ, THAT'S YOU. SO THIS CASE WAS ALSO ALSO INITIATED PROACTIVELY, BY OUR DEPARTMENT ON JUNE SEVENTH OF 2024 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15058 SOUTHWEST 173RD AVENUE, AS YOU STATED, THE OWNER HAS BEEN, IDENTIFIED AS LEXI NOR AUGUST. AND THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORD HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT ONE. UPON VISITING THE SITE, WE, WE OBSERVED ONE INOPERABLE VEHICLE. PARKED JUST ALONGSIDE THE DRIVEWAY. THIS IS THE ONLY VIOLATION THAT WE HAVE. IT'S A VIOLATION UNDER NINE ONE DASH, THREE TWO FOR ABANDONED SALVAGE AND JUNK PROPERTY, GOING INTO EXHIBIT TWO, YOU'LL SEE A DEPICTION OF THE VEHICLE IN QUESTION, NISSAN WHITE, NISSAN PATHFINDER, THE TIRES ALONG THE SIDE OF THE VEHICLE ARE ARE FLAT, AND THE REGISTRATION, HAS EXPIRED AS OF, DECEMBER OF 2022. OKAY WITH THESE OBSERVATIONS, WE WENT FORWARD WITH A NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOTICE OF HEARING FOR VIOLATIONS UNDER 91-32. THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION WAS SERVED VIA CERTIFIED REGULAR MAIL AS WELL AS POSTING, MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE, DOCTOR AFFIRMS THAT, WE ISSUED THE WE SERVED THE NOTICE VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON JUNE 11TH, 2024 AND POSTED THE PROPERTY ON JULY 2ND OF 2024, AND THE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE IS BEING MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FOUR. OKAY ON EXHIBIT FIVE, WE HAVE A COPY OF THE MAIL RECEIPT.AGAIN, INDICATING THE MAIL OUT ON JUNE 11TH, 2024. AND EXHIBIT SIX IS A DEPICTION OF THE POSTING ON THE PROPERTY ON JULY 2ND OF 2024. OKAY WE REVISITED THE SITE, YESTERDAY, ON JULY 15TH OF 2024, AND I CAN ATTEST THAT ALL THE OR THE VIOLATION IN QUESTION, DOES STILL EXIST. THE VEHICLE IS STILL PARKED IN THE SAME STATE OF WHICH IT'S DEPICTED IN THE, IN EXHIBIT TWO.
AND AT THIS TIME, WE'D LIKE THERE TO BE A FINAL ORDER RECORDED, MANDATING THAT THE RESPONDENT, EITHER REMOVE THE VEHICLE OR HAVE THE VEHICLE, RETURN THE VEHICLE TO AN OPERABLE STATE. ON OR BEFORE THE NEXT HEARING ON AUGUST 20TH OF 2024. SHOULD THE RESPONDENT FAIL TO COMPLY, WE, ASK THAT THERE BE A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100, PER DAY PER VIOLATION? AND THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED AN ADMINISTRATIVE COST OF $150, CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION.
AND WE'D LIKE THAT TO ALSO BE RECORDED ON THE ON THE ORDER. OKAY. SAME OBSERVATION AS TO EXHIBIT FIVE. YES, SIR. AS IN THE PREVIOUS CASES, ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF LEXUS OR AUGUST SEEING NO ONE? WITHOUT OBJECTION, I'LL ACCEPT IT INTO EVIDENCE. THE VILLAGE'S EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH SIX IN THIS CASE AND ORDER COMPLIANCE OWNER BEFORE, BASED UPON THE TESTIMONY AND THE EVIDENCE, ORDER COMPLIANCE ORDER BEFORE AUGUST 16TH, 2024. FAILING WHICH YOU WOULD FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY WILL ACCRUE AND A FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE SET FOR COMPLIANCE IN THIS CASE. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT HAS THAT ONE. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ONE IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE. AND THEN WE'VE GOT THE COATES CASE.
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE. THIS IS NUMBER 27 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 24-099 CHARLES COATES IS THE RESPONDENT FOR THE PROPERTY OF 14. 832 SOUTHWEST. 1/71 AVENUE. AND OFFICER PEREZ.
YES. SO THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY BY OUR DEPARTMENT AS WELL ON JUNE 7TH OF 2024. AND
[01:05:06]
THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION WAS SERVED TO THE RESPONDENT AS OF JUNE 11TH OF 2024. AND SINCE THE NOTICE HAS BEEN SERVED, I'VE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH MR. CHARLES COATES DAUGHTER, WHO INDICATED THAT THERE'S, FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND, MR. COATES, HAS UNFORTUNATELY PASSED AWAY, AND, SHE DOES NOT RESIDE WITHIN THE TOWN, BUT HAS INTENTIONS ON, COMING INTO TOWN AND, I GUESS CONDUCTING SOME OF THE MAINTENANCE THAT'S A BIT OVERDUE ON THE PROPERTY, SO I THINK FOR SOME TIME HE WAS ILL, AND, SO THE PROPERTY WAS NOT MAINTAINED, BUT REALLY WHAT THEIR MAIN ISSUE IS, IS JUST THE ROOF, IS IN SIGNIFICANT DISREPAIR AS WELL AS SOME OF THE STRUCTURAL, EXTERIOR STRUCTURAL ISSUES THAT THEY HAVE ON THE SITE, WITH REGARDS, THOUGH, TO THE WINDOWS AND THE FRONT DOOR, THOSE APPEAR TO BE IN A GOOD STATE, SO WE DID DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF MEETING WITH OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND MAYBE THEM TAKING SOME ACTION AND SAFEGUARDING THE PROPERTY, IN LIEU OF THESE REPAIRS, THAT COULD TAKE SOME TIME, SO AT THIS TIME, WE KIND OF WANT TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE WORK THAT NEEDS TO, TAKE PLACE, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A POSSIBILITY THAT WE CAN GET A CONTINUANCE ON THIS. FOR UPWARDS OF MAYBE 90 DAYS. 60 TO 90 DAYS WOULD BE WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE, JUST TO ALLOW THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND, AND GET EVERYTHING IN LINE FOR THE REPAIR. THAT, AND I'M ALSO TRYING TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FACT THAT, YOU KNOW, THE RESPONDENT HAS RECENTLY PASSED, AND I'M SURE THERE'S. ALL RIGHT. SO LET'S AND THERE'S NO LIFE SAFETY ISSUES. NO, SIR. IT IS VACANT CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY. ALL RIGHT. SO LET'S PUSH THIS UNTIL THE OCTOBER 15TH HEARING.OKAY. OCTOBER 15TH. IS THAT THE THIRD? I'M SORRY. I'M NOT HEARING. YEAH, THAT'S THE SECOND. THE 22ND IS THE THIRD. NO NO. OCTOBER 15TH. I WAS LOOKING AT MONDAY'S, NO WONDER.
NO, IT SHOULD BE OCTOBER 15TH. 15TH IS. YEAH. NO IT IS. YEAH FIRST IS A TUESDAY. EIGHTH IS A TUESDAY THE 15TH OR TUESDAY. YES WE AGREE. YES, SIR. OCTOBER 15TH.
ALL RIGHT. HOLD ON TO THE SPECIALLY SET CASES, MANY OF WHICH HAVE COMPLIED. AND LOOKS LIKE THE NEXT ONE DOWN IS GOING TO BE THE, NUMBER 34 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 24044.
FLAVIA QUIROZ AND JOSE RODRIGUEZ. LOYOLA AND SO AT THE, JUNE HEARING, THERE WAS A FINAL ORDER, RECORDED FOR THE PROPERTY. FORGIVE ME. TO ME. PULL UP THE ADDRESS HERE. SO I HAD ALREADY ISSUED AN ORDER. YES, YES, THERE IS THERE IS A FINAL ORDER THAT HAS BEEN SERVED, FOR THE PROPERTY AT ONE, FIVE, 384. MANDATING OR REQUIRING, COMPLIANCE ON OR
[01:10:02]
BEFORE THE DATE OF JULY 19TH TO 2024, SO AT THIS TIME WITH THIS CASE, I'VE, DID MAKE CONTACT WITH THE OWNER, MISS, LOYOLA RODRIGUEZ AND, SHE INDICATED TO ME THAT THERE'S SHE SHE WANTED TO KNOW IF SHE COULD GET SOME ADDITIONAL TIME, SHE THE DIFFICULTY SHE'S HAVING IS THAT SHE HAS, SOME OF HER SONS THAT ARE KIND OF TAKING OVER THE PROPERTY THERE AND, NOT DOING A GOOD JOB OF HELPING HER OUT WITH MAINTENANCE, A LOT OF THE DEBRIS IS, RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION AND, DIFFERENT SIDE JOBS THAT THEY DO. AND SO SHE'S GOING TO BE SETTING, OR SPEAKING WITH THEM TO GET THEM TO REMOVE THIS STUFF FROM HER PROPERTY. DO I REMEMBER CORRECTLY THAT THAT THERE WAS REALLY NO ONE HERE? YES. TO APPEAR FOR THEM. RIGHT. OKAY. SO WE JUST GAVE THEM A MONTH OR.YES THAT'S WHAT I DID. YES WHEN IN FACT YOU'RE TELLING ME THAT IT'S GOING TO TAKE LONGER TO.
YES SIR FOR THEM TO COMPLY. YES SIR. ALL RIGHT. SO YOU'RE REALLY REQUESTING AN ORDER TO EXTEND THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE? YES SIR. ALL RIGHT. AND WHAT IS YOUR RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE, WELL, WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO IS GET AN EXTENSION FOR ABOUT 60 DAYS BECAUSE THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF DEBRIS. AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BRICKS AND, AN ASSORTMENT OF JUST MATERIAL THAT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY. SO I WANT TO GIVE HER THAT OPPORTUNITY, SEEING AS SHE'S REACHED OUT AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE FACT THAT A VIOLATION DOES EXIST AND SHE SHE DOES WANT TO COMPLY. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE, THERE WAS A TRASH, AN ABANDONED VEHICLE CASE. OKAY, I CAN SAY AND I'D LIKE TO ADD, I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THE ABANDONED VEHICLE OR JUNK VEHICLE IS CURRENTLY REGISTERED, SO IT'S NO LONGER INOPERABLE. OKAY. SO NOW WE'RE DOWN TO TRASH. YES. ALL RIGHT.
ALL RIGHT. AND THE DATE I HAD SET FOR COMPLIANCE. WAS JULY 19TH. SO, LOOKING AT THE. WHEN YOU TAKE IT TO THE END OF SEPTEMBER, THAT WILL GIVE THEM HOPEFULLY AMPLE TIME. AND THEY'LL SAY, SEPTEMBER 30TH IS A MONDAY, SO LET'S SET IT THERE. OKAY.
[01:15:01]
YEAH. LET ME ALSO ADVISE THE CLERK THAT THIS ORDER NEEDS TO BE RECORDED. OKAY SO IT DOESN'T HAVE THE CERTIFIED COPY LANGUAGE ON IT, BUT YOU CAN DO THAT ON A SEPARATE SHEET, AND THEN, JUST ATTACH THE. SO YOU'LL HAVE AN EXTRA PAGE THIS PLUS THE NEXT PAGE. OKAY OKAY. BASICALLY WHAT IT SAYS THAT, IT JUST EXTENDS THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE FROM JULY 19TH, 2024 TO SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2024. ALL OTHER PARTS OF THE VIOLATION ORDER ISSUED IN THIS CASE REMAIN IN EFFECT AND ARE AFFIRMED AND SHALL BE FOLLOWED AS SET FORTH. SO OKAY, THAT'S THAT. 30. OKAY. FOR NEXT CASE. LOOKS LIKE NUMBER 38 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE 24049 BIBLE TEACHERS INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 721 SOUTHWEST. 1/71 AVENUE AND NOBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF THEM. SO ON ON THIS CASE, INITIALLY WE WERE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD, BUT THEY'VE, THEY'VE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH ME JUST THIS MORNING AND I WAS ABLE TO VERIFY THAT THEY THE LAST OF WHAT THEY NEEDED TO REMOVE FROM THE LOT HAS BEEN REMOVED AS OF THIS MORNING, SO WE CAN WE'D LIKE TO JUST SO YOU'RE GOING TO SAY THEY'RE IN COMPLIANCE? THEY'RE IN COMPLIANCE? YES, SIR.OKAY. GLAD TO HEAR THAT. ALL RIGHT, SO THE NEXT CASE IS, NUMBER 39 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 24050. AND THAT'S, JOEL LOPEZ. LOPEZ YOVANI. AND, MISS LEON. JULISSA LOPEZ. YES SO THIS CASE, WITH REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY AT 14756 SOUTHWEST 169 DRIVE, RECEIVED A, A FINAL ORDER, AT THE JUNE HEARING, AND SINCE THEN, I'VE, I'VE RECEIVED A CALL FROM JULISSA LOPEZ, INDICATING THAT, IF YOU ARE IT SPECIFIED HERE ON YOUR FINAL ORDER, THEY DO STAY OR LIVE OUTSIDE, OUT OUT OF TOWN, WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI. AND, THEY STATED THAT I GUESS THEY HAD SOME SORT OF DELAY AND RECEIVING THE NOTICE ON THEIR END, I CAN'T ATTEST TO THE FACT THAT THEY WERE NOT PRESENT AT THE JUNE HEARING, SIMILAR TO THIS, TO THE LAST CASE, SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, IT'S MERELY AN OVERGROWN, PROPERTY. IT'S A VACANT RESIDENTIAL LOT THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY, CUT, AND SO WE JUST NEED THEM TO, ADDRESS THE OVERGROWN VEGETATION ON THE LOT.
IS THE ADDRESS CORRECT? THE MIAMI ADDRESS? YES, IT IS. SHE DID SHE DID AFFIRM. AND WHEN WE SPOKE THAT THAT IS THE CORRECT ADDRESS. ALL RIGHT. DIDN'T HAPPEN TO GET AN EMAIL ADDRESS FOR IT, DID YOU? NO, I DID NOT. OH OKAY, BUT WITH THIS BEING SAID, WE'D JUST ASK THAT WE GET A AN EXTENSION FROM THIS ORDER FOR 30 DAYS, IN ORDER FOR THEM TO ADDRESS THE OVERGROWN LOT.
ALL RIGHT, SO THE ORDER IS STATED JULY 19TH, AND YOU WANT TO GO OUT ANOTHER MONTH. BECAUSE WE CAN GO OUT TO AUGUST 19TH. YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT. LET'S SEE. THIS IS CASE NUMBER 24050 OKAY. SO IN THIS CASE I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND EXTEND OUT THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE FROM JULY 19TH, 2024 TO AUGUST 19TH, 2024, AT THE REQUEST OF THE RESPONDENTS, CORRECT? YES SIR.
[01:21:42]
ALL RIGHT. SO ORDERED AND THE CASE IS NOW EXTENDED OUT TO AUGUST 19TH FOR COMPLIANCE.AND, PAUL, JUST TO BE SURE, THIS EXTENSION ALSO WOULD NEED TO BE RECORDED. AND SAY, SAVE THE EXTENSION, ORDERS NEED TO BE RECORDED, BECAUSE THEY BASICALLY AMEND THE FINAL ORDER OF VIOLATION. OKAY LET'S SEE HERE. WE GOT IS THE WALKER CASE. IS THAT IN COMPLIANCE? YES YES.
OKAY. AND HOLLOWAY. HOLLOWAY IS. OKAY. SO THE NEXT CASE IS THE HOLLOWAY CASE. YES, SIR. AND THAT'S, CASE NUMBER. THAT'S 41 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER TWO. 4062. CLEMSON HOLLOWAY AND SANDRA JOHNSON. HOLLOWAY FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 920 SOUTHWEST. 1/69 DRIVE. YES, SIR. OKAY WHAT HAVE WE GOT THERE, SO IN THE LAST HEARING, THE PROPERTY, THE CASE RECEIVED A CONTINUANCE EXTENDING THE CASE TO JULY 16TH OF 2024. OKAY, AS THE FINAL HEARING DATE, SINCE THEN, I'VE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE HOLLOWAY FAMILY. THEY DID NOT GET INTO SPECIFICS WITH REGARDS TO WHAT ALL'S GOING ON, BUT THIS REPRESENTATIVE IS GOING TO BE ADDRESSING THE MATTER, FOR, CLEMSON HOLLOWAY ASKING FOR A FURTHER CONTINUANCE. EXACTLY.
AND WE'D LIKE TO CONTINUE IT OUT TO THE, AUGUST, ON OR BEFORE THE UPCOMING HEARING. SO AUGUST 19TH? YES, SIR, WHATEVER THE LET'S SEE, AUGUST. OKAY SO THE AUGUST 20TH HEARING. YES, SIR.
[01:25:51]
ALL RIGHT. SO WHAT'S YOUR RECOMMENDATION? THIS MATTER HAS BEEN FURTHER CONTINUED TO, AUGUST 20TH, 2024. ALL RIGHT, ANYTHING ELSE? WE HAVE? NO, SIR. ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD, SO OUR* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.