[1.
July Docket 2023
][00:00:05]
ALL SET. OK, GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE. I'M GOING TO CALL THE ORDER. THE ESPECIAL MAGISTRATE HEARING FOR THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN FOR JUNE JULY. WHAT IS TODAY? THE 18TH 2023 PLEAS ALL RISE. JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. ALLEGIANCE TO HIS LIFE. TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION. UNDER THE LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL PLEASE BE SEATED. OFFICER PEREZ.
ARE WE STILL FOLLOWING THE DOCKET? OR DO YOU HAVE FOLKS? I SEE. WE GOT A FEW RESPONDENTS THAT, UH, THE ONE PERSON HERE SO WE GOT TO WE GOT OKAY. YOU'RE HERE TOO. ALL RIGHT? OKAY SO WHICH CASES UM DO YOU WANT TO TAKE FIRST WHERE WE DO HAVE INDIAN WOULD CO OPT TAB 10. WE HAVE THE RESPONDENT HERE FOR THAT, AND THEN THE FARMING ONE WOULD BE FOR TAB 13. LOUIS MCKNIGHT. ALL RIGHT. AND MR MCKNIGHT. YOU WERE HERE FIRST. I'M GONNA TAKE YOU. COME ON UP HERE. LET'S UH, LET'S HEAR FROM THE VILLAGE BECAUSE THIS WAS SPECIALLY SET. AND IN OTHER WORDS, WE'RE BRINGING IT BACK TO THIS STATE. AND YOU RECALL THAT SO WE'RE GONNA HEAR WHAT THE VILLAGE HAS TO SAY THAT I'LL SWEAR YOU IN AND THEN WE'LL GO FROM THERE, OKAY? DO YOU SWEAR FROM TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GIVE ME THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD, ALL RIGHT. LET ME JUST GET THE PACKET. MY CHECK. ALRIGHT SO WE GRANTED A CONTINUANCE FOR THAT. GO AHEAD, OFFICER PRESS WHENEVER YOU'RE READY, OKAY, WELL, SO THIS CASE WAS INITIALLY CITED, UM APRIL 25TH OF 2023 WITH REGARDS TO A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14518 SOUTHWEST 178TH AVENUE. UM . AT THIS HEARING IT WAS BROUGHT TO HEARING ON MAY 16TH 2023. AND AT THE HEARING, THERE WAS A CONTINUANCE THAT WAS ISSUED WARRANT IN COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF JULY. 18TH. UM, NOW THE VIOLATIONS IN QUESTION AT THE TIME THAT THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION WAS ISSUED ARE 3-5 0.5 FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE. 67.201 B FOR TRASH. 21.114 FOR THE EXTERIOR WALLS. AND 21.1 TO 1, WINDOWS, SKYLIGHT AND DOOR FRAMES AND 21.1 TO 2 EXTERIOR DOORS. OKAY NOW SINCE THEN, MR MCKNIGHT IS I WANT TO I WANT TO SAY, MISS MILDRED MCKNIGHT IS HIS GRANDMA, HIS GRANDMOTHER AND HE'S, UH, DOING HIS DUE DILIGENCE AND STEPPING UP AND, UH, FOR HER AND MAINTAINING THIS PROPERTY. NOW, SINCE THEN, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF THE OUTDOOR STORAGE AND TRASH HAS BEEN REMOVED. THERE WAS AN END UP VEHICLE THAT THAT'S BEEN REMOVED A RANGE OF DIFFERENT APPLIANCES AND JUST MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT THAT'S BEEN REMOVED. REALLY. THE ONLY THING THAT'S STILL OUTSTANDING OR, UM, IS GOING TO CONSIST OF THE MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE, THE EXTERIOR WALLS, THE WINDOWS AND DOORS ALL THE EXTERIOR DOORS NOW. INITIALLY UM MR MCKNIGHT HAS EXPRESSED THAT HE HAS FULL INTENTION ON COMPLYING WITH WITH THOSE WITH THIS. YOU KNOW, THIS PORTION OF THE N O V, UM HE IS WORKING ON, YOU KNOW, I GUESS GATHERING SOME FINDS TO GO AHEAD AND, UH AND ATTACK THESE THINGS IN A TIMELY MATTER. UM AND WE ALSO WANTED A LOT OF BUILDING OFFICIAL THE OPPORTUNITY TO, UH, MAKE AN ASSESSMENT OF THE STRUCTURE JUST TO ENSURE PRIOR TO MR MCKNIGHT INVESTING ALL THIS TIME AND EFFORT. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE STRUCTURE ITSELF IS SOUND. UM WHICH WAS EXPRESSED TO HIM. I DID HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH HIM AND EXPRESSED THAT AND, UH AND HE'S UNDERSTANDING OF IT. SO WITH ALL OF THAT BEING SAID, WE WE'D LIKE TO, UM, GET SOME ADDITIONAL TIME
[00:05:04]
ON THIS. UM YOU KNOW, I KNOW IT'S NOT TYPICALLY, WHAT WE'D LIKE TO DO IS KIND OF ROLE CASES OVER, BUT HE IS SHOWING INTENTION OF FACILITATING COMPLIANCE. I MEAN, AS I SAID, THE TRASH AND DEBRIS AND OUTDOOR STORAGE VIOLATIONS ARE IN COMPLIANCE. COMPLIANCE OKAY, SO TWO OF FOUR YEAH. YEAH SO IF WE CAN GET ADDITIONAL TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IF WE CAN GET ANOTHER 60 DAYS ON THIS. AND LIKE THAT, AT ALL, LOT, US AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN THERE AND WE COULD LAY OUT A CORRECTION ORDER. MAYBE FOR MR MCKNIGHT ON, UM WHAT KIND OF, UH STRUCTURAL REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE? UH ON THE FRONT ON THE STRUCTURE ITSELF. ALRIGHT UM, MR MCKNIGHT . IF YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, DO YOU SWEAR, AFFIRM TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GIVE WILL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. SO I DO HAVE HEARD THE OFFICER. ANYTHING YOU WANT TO CHANGE FROM WHAT HE SAID OR ANYTHING, DAD, NOT ONLY I THINK I WANTED DAD WAS HE'S RIGHT. UM, HE GAVE ME TIME GOT UP ALL THE OUTDOOR VEHICLES, THE WAR EVERYTHING, AND I LITERALLY HAD THE STORY OF MY GRANDMOTHER TURNED THE STORY OVER TO ME. SO I LITERALLY GOT A STORY THAT I CLEANED UP THE OUTSIDE, AND IT'S BASICALLY SIT DOWN LIKE NO TRESPASSING. IT AIN'T THE STORY IS NOT RUNNING. I HAVE TWO APARTMENTS ON THE SIDE THAT I GOT CLOSED DOWN. NOBODY'S LIVING . IT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR, LIKE, TWO YEARS NOW. AND I'M BASICALLY IN THE PROCESS OF LIKE DOING PAPERWORK WITH MY GRANDMOTHER AND A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS THAT TRY TO REOPEN THE STORE. SO WHEN HE'S TALKING ABOUT THE INSPECTOR, LIKE I AGREE WITH THIS, SPECTER GOTTA CHECK IT OUT AND MAKE SURE THE BUILDING SOUND AND EVERYTHING BEFORE I REOPENED AND STUFF LIKE THAT, BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW LIKE EVEN LIKE IN THE 60 DAYS THAT HE'S SAYING, LIKE I CAN BOX THE WINDOWS IF I NEED TO PUT A FENCE THE ON THE SIDE THAT MAKE SURE THAT NOBODY CAN COME ON MY PROPERTY OR WHATEVER, BUT THE PHYSICAL LIKE MAINTENANCE TO THE BUILDING AND DIFFERENT THINGS. IT'S GONNA TAKE ME A LITTLE TIME LIKE, BUT I LITERALLY GOT IT CLOSED DOWN WITH NO TRESPASSING. AIN'T NOBODY'S ON THE PROPERTY. IT'S NOT FALLING DOWN. IT'S A BRICK STRUCTURE. OKAY PILOT COUPLE WINDOWS ON THE SIDE APARTMENTS, BUT I CAN LITERALLY IF I HAVE TO PUT BOARDS ON IT OR WHATEVER TO KEEP ANYBODY FROM COMING TO IT. BUT I HAVEN'T I KNOW YOU SAY THE EXPECTED ONE TO COME OUT. BUT IF THE INSPECTOR COME OUT RIGHT NOW , HE'LL JUST BE BASICALLY JUST MAKING ME A WHOLE LIST OF THINGS. I KNOW I NEED TO GET ACCOMPLISHED WITH WHY REOPEN THE STORE. BUT BEFORE REOPENING OR WHATEVER, I AGREE, YES, I WILL LET THIS BACK TO COME. CHECK IT OUT. LOOK AT IT FROM TOP TO BOTTOM WHEN I REOPENED, BUT IF I TRY TO GET IT ONLY THING I COULD DO IN THE NEXT 60 DAYS IS BASICALLY CLEAN UP AND PUT WINDOWS OVER THE BOARD AND NO TRESPASSING SIGNS. LET ME SUGGEST TO YOU THAT, UM BECAUSE . YOU'RE BASICALLY COMING ONTO THIS PROPERTY TO RESCUE YOUR GRANDMOTHER. SHE'S BASICALLY TURNING THE STORE BUSINESS. OVER TO ME. OKAY SO WHAT I'M THINKING IS THAT IT'S ALMOST LIKE A ALMOST LIKE A CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP. CHANGE OF YOU. IT'S GONNA BE THAT REAL SOON. WHAT I'M THINKING IS PERHAPS BETWEEN . THE VILLAGES, CODE ENFORCEMENT AND YOURSELF. YOU COULD COME UP WITH SOME SORT OF STIPULATED AGREEMENT, SOMETHING THAT I MADE SURE SIGN AND I COULD THEN UM I COULD THEN A PROVEN AGREED ORDER WILL COMPLY HAVE NO NO ISSUE WITH TIME YOU NEED TO DO IT, BUT I JUST KNEW IF I AGREE, LIKE RIGHT NOW, ON A CERTAIN TIME FRAME TO GET THE STORY IN ORDER TO BE JUST LOSING ALRIGHT. I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND CONTINUE THE CASE. FOR THE TWO MONTHS THAT'S BEEN REQUESTED BY THE VILLAGE.WHAT THAT WILL GIVE YOU IS THE TIME TO MAKE THE ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPERTY, OKAY AND THEN AND THEN DECIDE. WHAT IT IS YOU'RE GOING TO DO AND THEN COME TO SOME AGREEMENT WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT CLEANING UP OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. THAT HE SEES THAT I NEED TO DO. I HAVE NO ISSUE WITH ATTACKING IT. ALL RIGHT, WELL, THIS WILL GIVE YOU THE TIME TO DO THAT. BUT I THINK THE IDEA OF, UH, STIPULATED, UH , STIPULATION AND AGREED WATER? YES BROUGHT BACK AT THE WHERE ARE WE? AUGUST SEPTEMBER. LET'S SAY THE SEPTEMBER HEARING. WOULD GIVE US THE TIME THEN TO DO WHAT YOU NEED TO DO AND SATISFY THE VILLAGE AS WELL. JUST. LET'S SEE . DO WE KNOW THE DATA? THE
[00:10:03]
SEPTEMBER HEARING? IT IS THE 18TH 19TH. OKAY THANK YOU SO MUCH. ALRIGHT SO I'M GONNA CONTINUE THIS UNTIL SEPTEMBER 19TH AND AT THAT TIME WHAT I ANTICIPATE HAPPENING IS THE THAT , UH YOU WOULD THEN PRESENT THIS STIPULATION AND AGREE TO WATER IF YOU'RE NOT ABLE TO DO THAT, IF YOU CAN'T COME TO SOME AGREEMENT, NO, WE'RE GONNA COME BACK ANYWAY, BECAUSE I WILL ADJUDICATED. I'LL MAKE A DECISION AS TO WHEN YOU NEED TO COMPLY AND HOW OKAY? YES. SO I'M HOPEFUL THAT THAT YOU ALL WILL AGREE. SO ALRIGHT, SO AS FOR CASE NUMBER 23054. UM THE RESPONDENT MILDRED LOUISE MCKNIGHT. MR MCKNIGHT, AND I'M SORRY. YOUR FIRST NAME E R. N E S ALRIGHT ERNEST MCKNIGHT ON BEHALF OF, UH MILDRED LOUISE. MCKNIGHT. I'M GONNA EXTEND THIS CASE. AND GRANT A SECOND CONTINUANCE. THE FIRST ONE BROUGHT YOU TO THIS HEARING, BUT . AND THEN WE'LL SET A FINAL HEARING DATE FOR SEPTEMBER. 19TH 2023 HERE AT 10 A.M. YEAH. AND SEE. AND, UM. IF WE CAN, MADAME CORTON, CAN WE MAKE A COPY OF THIS FOR MR MCKNIGHT AND JUST GIVE IT TO HIM? I JUST MARKET UH BY HAND DELIVERY. AT THE HEARING. THERE YOU GO. OKAY, SO IF YOU JUST WAIT, CLARK WILL GIVE YOU A COPY OF THAT WATER AND THEN WE'LL EITHER SEE YOU IN TWO MONTHS OR YOU WILL HAVE AGREED. IN WHICH CASE IF YOU SIGN THAT STIPULATION, YOU DON'T NEED TO COME BACK. OKAY, GOOD. THANK YOU. MHM.OKAY NEXT CASES 23 DAYS. 073 INDIAN WOULD COOP INC. AND, UM. OH, I SEE YOU HERE ON BEHALF OF THE CO OPT AND. THIS IS ALSO A REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE. SO. LET'S HEAR WHAT THE VILLAGE HAS TO SAY. AND THEN YOU CAN COME ON UP TO THE PODIUM. THAT'LL BE FINE. AND THEN I'LL SWEAR YOU IN AND WE'LL GO FROM THERE, OKAY? ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD, ROB. OKAY? AH SO THIS CASE WAS STARTED ON JUNE 21ST 2023 REGARDING A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16352, SOUTHWEST INDIAN WOULD CIRCLE. THE OWNER, UM, IDENTIFIED AS INDIAN WOULD CO OPTING AND THEY HAVE A TENANT ON THIS PROPERTY THAT IS CONSTRUCTING A DECK. UM WITHOUT A PERMIT WITHOUT VALID PERMITS.
UM AND SPEAKING WITH, UH REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE INDIAN WOULD CO OP THEY'VE EXPRESSED THAT THEY'VE HAD, YOU KNOW, QUITE EXTENSIVE ISSUES, AND WE'VE ACTUALLY HAD THIS ISSUE BEFORE. ONCE BEFORE, ALREADY WITH THIS TENANT AND THEY'RE CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING WITH THEIR ATTORNEYS ON RESOLVING THE ISSUE WITH THE TENANT. UM AND SO, WITH THAT BEING SAID THEY'VE BEEN GREAT ABOUT MAINTAINING COMMUNICATION WITH OUR DEPARTMENT AND KEEPING US AH UP TO DATE ON, YOU KNOW THEIR PROCESS, AND WE'D LIKE TO GIVE THEM UH, ADDITIONAL TIME. I THINK IN OUR LAST CONVERSATION IT WAS EXPRESSED AT 30 DAYS COULD, UM, BE ENOUGH FOR THEM TO HAVE THIS, UH. YOU KNOW, ADDRESSED COMPLETELY. UM, BUT I BELIEVE KEVIN. MR KEVIN IS HERE , AND HE COULD ALSO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT MORE TESTIMONY AND SUPPORT TO SOME OF THAT. ALRIGHT
[00:15:04]
IF YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TESTIMONY ABOUT TO GO WILL BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP YOU GOD AND YOUR FULL NAME KEVIN BEERS AND YOUR ADDRESS. YOUR BUSINESS ADDRESS. THAT'S FINE. 16336 SOUTHWEST INDIAN WOULD CIRCLE OKAY? AND I'M SORRY. HOW DO YOU SPELL YOUR LAST NAME? B. E. R S COMMON COMMON SPELLING. OKAY? ALRIGHT, MR PIERCE. UM YOU'VE HEARD THE REQUEST FROM THE VILLAGE. TO GRANT AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS. IN THIS CASE, MHM UM THANKS. THEN YOU WANT TO TELL ME ABOUT IT OR ANYTHING YOU WANT.YES SO THIS, UH THIS STRUCTURE WAS BUILT WITHOUT HOH APPROVAL AND OBVIOUSLY WITHOUT, UM, THE NECESSARY VILLAGE PERMITS SO WE WOULDN'T HAVE APPROVED THIS STRUCTURE IN THE FIRST PLACE, AND WE'VE ASKED HIM MANY TIMES TO REMOVE IT PRIOR TO THE VILLAGE GETTING INVOLVED. AND NOW HE'S STARTING TO BECOME A NUISANCE TO HIS NEIGHBORS WITH THE CONSTRUCTION HE'S BUILDING ONTO OTHER PEOPLE'S PARCELS. SO WE INTEND TO REMOVE THE STRUCTURE. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE THE LEGAL COVERAGE TO DO THAT. SO WE WANT TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION. THE FACT THAT WE SHOULD HAVE TO THE HEARING. SO THAT YOU KNOW, WHEN WE DO GO IN THE ROOM AND REMOVE IT, WE CAN'T BE LIABLE FOR ANY PERSONAL PROPERTY VILLAGE. DO WE HAVE THE TENANTS? INFORMATION WE KNOW WHO THEY ARE. WE DON'T HAVE. I'VE GONE OUT AND TRIED TO MAKE CONTACT THERE. AND I'VE JUST CONSISTENTLY RECEIVED NO CONTACT . UM AND I WOULD JUST SOLELY RELIED ON THE INFORMATION THAT'S ON THE TAX ROLLS. OKAY? UM. WITH THE COOP. BE WILLING TO GIVE THE VILLAGE THAT INFORMATION. YEAH. OF COURSE, IN WHICH CASE I WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU ALSO THAT YOU AMEND YOUR NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND CITE THEM AS WELL AS THE CO OP, OKAY AND IF NEED BE, WE CAN SUMMONS THEM TO HEARING OKAY? OKAY? WHICH YOU KNOW, EITHER THEY WILL COMPLY OR THEY'RE NOT GOING TO COMPLY. BUT IT MAY HELP THE PROCESS AND WE ALSO DO HAVE VISION PROCEEDINGS FILED IN THE COUNTY COURT AGAINST THIS PERSON FOR YOU KNOW OTHER REASONS, ALONG WITH THIS SO IDEALLY. I WOULD HAVE TO CHECK WITH OUR ATTORNEYS TO SEE A TIMELINE. BUT IDEALLY WE COULD HAVE PICKED THIS TENANT PRIOR TO REMOVING THE STRUCTURE TO AVOID ANY TURMOIL, BUT WE'D BE WILLING TO REMOVE IT WHILE IT HAS 10. IT'S STILL THERE. YOU KNOW, TO STAY IN COMPLIANCE. ALL RIGHT. WELL UM I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD THEN. YOU. DO YOU BOTH THINK THAT 30 DAYS IS ENOUGH TIME? UM IT WOULD DEFINITELY BE ENOUGH TIME FOR US TO GO AHEAD AND REMOVE THIS STRUCTURE, BUT I COULDN'T SAY TO YOUR QUARRY. EVICTION. YEAH, FOR THE EVICTION TO TAKE PLACE. I WOULD HAVE TO. WE CAN PUSH IT OUT TO SEPTEMBER. IT'LL GIVE ME ENOUGH TIME TO COORDINATE WITH THE TENANT. AND YOU KNOW THAT, OF COURSE, THAT YOU MADE OF ME CONTACTING A TENANT AND GETTING ALL THAT UNDERWAY. UM YEAH, I'M ASSUMING YOU WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO KNOW I WOULD FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH SEPTEMBER FOR SURE. ALL RIGHT, I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND UM AND MOVE IT TO THE SEPTEMBER 18TH 1918 HEARINGS.
SEPTEMBER 18TH. 19TH. OKAY? 19TH .
OKAY. AND ONCE AGAIN I'VE GOT A COPY OF THE ORDER THAT WILL MAKE FOR YOU AND JUST YOU CAN TAKE WITH YOU. OKAY? I APPRECIATE IT. ALRIGHT GOOD LUCK. THANK YOU, UH, THAT WORKS OUT. HMM.
[00:20:13]
IT WILL BE EASIER TO GET THROUGH. ALRIGHT. UM, BACK TO THE TOP OF THE BATTING ORDER.SOUNDS GOOD. OKAY? ALL RIGHT. SO THIS IS THE FIRST CASES CASE 23. ZERO WHOOPS THAT COMPLIANCE YOU'VE GOT ONE TRUE 34 1ST THOSE WHO ARE GOOD FIRST FOUR CASES ARE IN COMPLIANCE. CASE NUMBER FIVE IS 23-068 IDEAL PROPERTY LLC. THE PROPERTY AT 15, 4 92, SOUTHWEST WARFIELD'S BOULEVARD.
AND WHENEVER YOU'RE READY OKAY, SO THIS CASE I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER. UM IT'S CONCERNING THE ADDRESS THAT 15492 SOUTHWEST WAR FIELD BOULEVARD. THIS PROPERTY USED TO BE KNOWN AS JR'S RESTAURANT AND IS NOW BEEN RENAMED ON THEIR NEW OWNERSHIP AS L RANCH ITO. UM SO IN. NEW OWNERSHIP COMING IN. THEY'RE OBVIOUSLY TAKING ON A LOT OF YOU KNOW, VIOLATIONS THAT WERE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THEM OWNING THE PROPERTY. UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS SINCE ADDRESSED. THE VIOLATION UNDER 67.201 B FOR TRASH. THE ONLY TWO OUTSTANDING VIOLATIONS. THERE'S A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND RV THAT'S PARKED ALONG THE BACKSIDE OF THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. UM, AS WELL AS SOME ABANDONED AND SOUTH OR I GUESS YOU COULD SAY ABANDONED AN INOPERABLE VEHICLES . THERE'S A TRUCK THAT WAS MAINTAINED THERE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS, UM WITHIN THE PARKING LOT , AND, UM IT APPEARS TO BE A HELICOPTER OR LIKE PORTION OF A HELICOPTER THAT'S BEING MAINTAINED ON THE PROPERTY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER SAID WAS THERE PRIOR TO THEM. TAKING FULL OWNERSHIP. UM SO THEY'RE WORKING ON GETTING THOSE TWO VEHICLES REMOVED IN THE RV IS SAID TO BE REMOVED THIS WEEK. THEY CONTACTED THE OWNER AND ARE GOING TO BE REMOVING THAT. SO I WANTED TO GIVE THEM 30 DAYS AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS TO FACILITATE COMPLIANCE ON THAT, UM AND THEY'VE BEEN GOOD ABOUT IT. THEY THEY'VE IF THEY WERE LISTED ON A SPECIAL SET ON THIS DOCKET AS WELL, AND THEY'VE CURED THAT VIOLATION. SO I'M CONFIDENT THAT THEY'LL FACILITATE COMPLIANCE WITHIN THAT TIME. OKAY SO THE NEXT HEARING IS AUGUST 15TH. IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY? ALL RIGHT. I'M LOOKING AT. I DON'T SEE ANYBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF IDEAL PROPERTY LLC. NOPE. GO WITHOUT OBJECTION. I'LL GO AHEAD AND CONTINUE THIS CASE TO AUGUST 15TH. 2023 AT THE REQUEST OF THE VILLAGE.
AND IS THE IS THE TRASH STILL THERE OR DIDN'T REMOVE IT. THEY'VE THEY'VE ADDRESSED THE TRASH VIOLATION, AND IT'S SOLELY THE STORAGE OF THE RV. AND THE VEHICLES. YEAH.
ALRIGHT NEXT ONE IS CASE NUMBER 23069. AND. THE OWNERS ARE. WHILE YOU'RE LOPEZ MORALES AND MARCELA. ARENAS, MALANDA. A AND IT'S FOR THE PROPERTY AT 15573, SOUTHWEST OSCEOLA STREET. AND
[00:25:10]
WHAT HAVE WE GOT THERE? OKAY WELL, SO THIS CASE WAS INITIATED PROACTIVELY UPON MY DISCOVERY ON JUNE 21ST 2023 AND THE RESPONDENT MR WILLIAM MORALES AND, UH, MARICELA MALDONADO OR NOT PRESENT. UM AS YOU STATED THE CASE CONCERNS THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT. FORGIVE ME. THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15573 SOFTWARE, OSCEOLA STREET. INDIAN TOM, FLORIDA 34956. AND, UH, A COPY OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISERS RECORD HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT ONE. ON JUNE 21ST OF 2023. I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND AT THAT TIME I DISCOVERED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATION. WE HAVE A VIOLATION UNDER SECTION 3-5 0.8 FOR STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. UM. THE PRIMARY ISSUE WITH THESE VEHICLES IS THAT UPON INSPECTION, WE DISCOVERED THAT THERE WAS ELECTRICAL WIRING AND MAKESHIFT PLUMBING CONNECTED TO THE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE, AND WE DETERMINED THAT THERE WAS A TENANT OCCUPYING THE RV ON THE PREMISES, SO. ESSENTIALLY THE LANDOWNER WAS LEASING THE RV OUT AS A AS A UNIT. ALMOST LIKE AN APARTMENT UNIT. UM NOW SINCE THEN, UH GET BACK ON TRACK HERE. SO. IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT EXHIBIT TWO WILL MARK A DEPICTION OF THE RV AS YOU CAN SEE IN THAT PICTURE IN THE RV IS, UH, NOT COLLAPSED, AS IT NORMALLY WOULD BE, UH, IF IT WAS JUST TRADITIONALLY BEING STORED , AND IT'S FULLY EXPANDED, ALL THE FEATURES ARE ARE OPEN, AND I WASN'T ABLE TO GET UP UNDER TO GET A CLEAR PHOTO OF THE PLUMBING FIXTURES. BUT THERE IS FIXTURES THAT ARE TIED INTO ONE OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY. UM ON THE BOTTOM SIDE OF THE RV FOR THE GRAY WATER. OKAY WHICH IS WHAT YOU OBSERVED? YES, YES. UM. NOW BASED UPON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOTICE A HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT. ON JUNE 21ST 2023 FOR THE HEARING OF JULY 18TH 2023, WHICH IS MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT THREE. AND, UM. IN THE NOTICE THE RESPONDENT THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN. UNTIL. JULY 5TH TO FACILITATE COMPLIANCE. FOR THE LAST CONVERSATION I HAD, WHICH WAS EARLIER THIS MORNING. UM THEY ESTABLISHED THAT THE TENANT IS NO LONGER OCCUPYING THE RV. I HAVEN'T HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO PHYSICALLY GO OUT TO THE PROPERTY. VERIFY THAT AND THEY'RE STILL WORKING ON DETACHING THE MAKESHIFT PLUMBING. BUT THE ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS AS WELL AS A HOSE THAT WAS FACILITATING WATER HAVE SINCE BEEN DISCONNECTED FROM THE RV. UM SO WE ARE ON SCHEDULE. HOPEFULLY THIS WEEK FOR ME TO GO BACK OUT TO THE PROPERTY TO VERIFY FULL COMPLIANCE. UM OKAY , BUT THAT'S THE LAST LINE OF COMMUNICATION I'VE HAD WITH THE RESPONDENT SINCE THEN. UM ALSO MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FOR IS THE POSTING OF THE N O. V.OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY, AS WELL AS EXHIBIT FIVE OF MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE, REFLECTING THE DATE OF ISSUANCE. AND POSTING. AND. ALRIGHT, I'VE GOT HIM. THANK YOU. AND BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE, I REQUESTED THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS OF THE VILLAGE CALLED ON OR BEFORE THE FOLLOWING HEARING. UM. AND IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THEN BE REQUIRED TO PAY A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY PER VIOLATION, UM, THEREAFTER. AND THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING. AND AT THIS TIME THIS WILL CONCLUDE MY TESTIMONY. ALL RIGHT. I'M
[00:30:04]
GOING TO ORDER COMPLIANCE. I THINK ON THE 14TH, WHICH IS THE DAY BEFORE THE HEARING REPORT, IF YOU KNOW WHAT OCCURRED. ALRIGHT SO, UH, NOBODY HERE ON BEHALF OF MR MORALES OR MISS MALDEN DONDO. UM. SO WITHOUT OBJECTION, EXCEPT INTO EVIDENCE . THE VILLAGES EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH FIVE IN THIS CASE BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE IN YOUR TESTIMONY. I'M GOING TO FIND THAT VIOLATION AS CHARGE DOES EXIST ON THE PROPERTY, AND WE'RE GOING TO ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 14TH 2023. FEELING WHAT YOU FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY WILL ACCRUE.FURTHER AWARD COST IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID. TO THE VILLAGE AND NO LATER THAN AUGUST 14TH 2023.
THE NEXT ONE. IS NUMBER SEVEN ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 23070. MIGUEL MOLINA. AND FLOOR.
RICARDO. AND THAT'S FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 7 55, SOUTHWEST 1 69TH DRIVE. WHENEVER YOU'RE RIGHT. OKAY? SO THIS PROPERTY WAS ALSO INITIATED PROACTIVELY UPON MY DISCOVERY ON JUNE 21ST 2023. THE RESPONDENTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS MR MIGUEL MOLINA AND FLOWED UH, ACCARDO. WHO ARE NOT PRESENT. UH, THE. PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORD HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT ONE, AND THE PROPERTY AND VIOLATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS 14755 SOUTHWEST 169 DRIVE. AND THE INTEL, FLORIDA 34956. UM UPON MY INSPECTION ON JUNE 21ST 2023. I DISCOVERED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATION UNDER SECTION 21.7 FOR PERMITS. AH THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. UH AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION APPEARED TO HAVE HAD AN ADDITION BUILT ON AS WELL AS A WOODEN UM PATIO STRUCTURE THAT WAS ADDED ON TO THE REAR END OF THE PROPERTY AND THERE ARE NO VALID PERMITS OBTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER IN ORDER TO CONDUCT THIS, UH, THIS WORK SO I . THAT TIME I DOCUMENTED PHOTO.
THERE IS A LARGE PRIVACY FENCE THAT GOES ALONGSIDE THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. BUT I WAS ABLE TO GET A VANTAGE POINT OF THE OF THE ADDITIONS. AND IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT EXHIBIT TWO YOU'LL SEE.
SO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE IS THAT LIKE A PINK SALMON COLORED AND THEN YOU'LL SEE. THE ADDITION THAT'S BUILT ON IS THE PANELING IS PAINTED YELLOW. UM AND IT HAS A FAIRLY NEW ROOF. YOU COULD TELL THE SINGLING IS DIFFERENT FROM THAT OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. AND THEN JUST.
ALONGSIDE THAT YOU COULD SEE THE NEW WORD. THE TWO BY FOUR STUD FRAMING FOR THE AWNING OF A PATIO THAT WAS ADDED TO THE BACK SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. OKAY QUESTION. YES, THE YELLOW.
SHARED STRUCTURE LOOKS LIKE IT'S FLASHED ONTO THE ONTO THE MAIN BUILDING. YES. IS IT, UM, ACCESSIBLE FROM THE OUTSIDE, OR ONLY THROUGH THE BUILDING? A. I WANT TO SAY I DON'T HAVE YOU KNOW, I HAVEN'T GONE INSIDE THE ACTUAL STRUCTURE AND I WASN'T ABLE TO GET ADVANTAGE POINT ALONG THE REAR SIDE TO SEE IF MAYBE IT'S JUST A SHED THAT'S BEEN FASTENED TO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. BUT SEEING AS THERE'S NO WINDOWS OR ANYTHING ALONG THE EXTERIOR POINTS, UH. IT'S HARD FOR ME TO CONFIRM WHETHER OR NOT IT'S ACCESSIBLE FROM WITHIN THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE OR NOT, YEAH.
OKAY, BUT NONETHELESS, NO PERMITS. OKAY UM, AND SO, BASED UPON MY INVESTIGATION, I ISSUED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE RESPONDENT ON JUNE 21ST 2023 FOR THE HEARING OF JULY 18TH OF 2023, WHICH IS MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT THREE. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY COMMUNICATION FROM THE RESPONDENT. UM AS I STATED THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION WAS ISSUED VIA CERTIFIED MAIL AND POSTING AND EXHIBITS FOUR AND FIVE. ARE MY POSTING A PHOTO OF THE
[00:35:07]
POSTING. ON JULY 7TH, AS WELL AS MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF VALIDATING THE POINTS OF SERVICE. OKAY? AND, UM. SO BASED UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE, I REQUEST THAT THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS OF THE VILLAGE CODE HONOR BEFORE THE, UM FOLLOWING HEARING AND IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THEN BE REQUIRED TO PAY A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY PER VIOLATION THEREAFTER. AND THE VILLAGE HAS INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND I REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING. AND THIS WILL CONCLUDE MY TESTIMONY.RIGHT? NO. ONE HERE ON BEHALF OF MIGUEL MOLINA OR FLOOR ACCARDO. SEEING NO. ONE WITHOUT OBJECTION , EXCEPT INTO EVIDENCE. THE VILLAGES EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH FIVE BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE, AND YOUR TESTIMONY WILL FIND IT A VIOLATION OF SECTION 21.7 VILLAGE CODE DOES EXIST ON THE PROPERTY AND FURTHER ORDER COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE. AUGUST 14TH 2023 FAILING WHICH YOU FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY WILL ACCRUE. AND ALL AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150. TO THE VILLAGE TO BE PAID. BY THE RESPONDENT NO LATER THAN AH! AUGUST 14TH 2023.
RIGHT NEXT ONE IS NUMBER EIGHT ON THE DOCKET. IT'S CASE NUMBER 23071. THEN THE RESPONDENT IS ARTISTS WALTER JACKSON FOR THE PROPERTY OF 14 776 SOUTHWEST 169TH DRIVE. OKAY? UM, SO THIS PROPERTY. IT WAS ALSO INITIATED PROACTIVELY UPON MY DISCOVERY OF JUNE 21ST 2023. UM. AND THE PROPERTY OWNER, MR. ARTIST WALTER JACKSON IS NOT PRESENT. AND THE PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORD FOR THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION. 14776 SOUTHWEST 169 DRIVE HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT ONE. UPON MY INSPECTION ON JUNE 21ST 2023 I DISCOVERED A THE FOLLOWING VIOLATION UNDER 91.32 FOR ABANDONED SALVAGE OR JUNK PROPERTY. AH, PROHIBITED GENERALLY. AND IT'S PRIMARILY REGARDING AN INOPERABLE BOATS. SPECIFICALLY IT APPEARS TO BE THAT OF LIKE A PONTOON BOAT THAT IS NOT ON A TRAILER. IT'S JUST DUMPED ON A VACANT LOT. UM AND I ALL WELL, I'D ALSO LIKE TO ADD THAT THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT HAVE A PRIMARY STRUCTURE. IT IS. IT'S A VACANT LOT. UM AND, UH, SO UPON THIS OBSERVATION, UM. I DOCUMENTED, UH, PHOTO OF THE TOP BOAT THAT'S BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU. AS UH, AS EXHIBIT TWO. AND, UM. AS A RESULT, A NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOTICE A HEARING. WAS . ISSUED. THANK YOU TURN. WAS ISSUED ON JUNE. 21ST OF 2023. UM REQUESTING THAT THE. VIOLATOR COMPLY OR BEFORE THE DATE OF JULY 5TH. OKAY? AND I WAS WARRANTING A HEARING. ON JULY 18TH OF 2023. SO THIS, UH AGAIN, I HAD THAT THAT N O. V HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YEAR'S EXHIBIT THREE AND I HAVEN'T HAD ANY CONTEXT AND THEN WITH THE RESPONDENT THEY HAVEN'T RESPONDED TO THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION THAT WAS ISSUED. UM.
AND THE MOVIE WAS POSTED AGAIN ON JULY 7TH OF 2023. AND MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AND THE EVIDENCE OF MY POSTING HAS BEEN MARKED BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FOUR AND FIVE. OKAY? AND BASED
[00:40:04]
UPON MY TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE, I REQUEST THAT THE RESPONDENT BE ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED PROVISIONS OR THE VILLAGE CALLED ON OR BEFORE THE FOLLOWING HEARING. AND IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE BY THEN BE REQUIRED TO PAY A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY PER VIOLATION THEREAFTER. THE VILLAGE HAS ALSO INCURRED A REASONABLE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 CONDUCTING THIS INVESTIGATION, AND WE REQUEST THAT THE VILLAGE BE REIMBURSED THIS AMOUNT OF THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING. AND THIS WILL CONCLUDE MY TESTIMONY. OKAY? ALRIGHT LOOKING OUT. DON'T SEE ANYONE HERE ON BEHALF OF ARTISTS WALTER JACKSON. NO. ONE WITHOUT OBJECTION, EXCEPT INTO EVIDENCE OF VILLAGES, EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH FIVE IN THIS CASE BASED UPON THAT EVIDENCE AND YOUR TESTIMONY I FIND THAT A VIOLATION OF SECTION 91.3 TO THE VILLAGE CODE DOES EXIST ON THE PROPERTY AND FURTHER ORDER COMPLIANCE OWNER BEFORE AUGUST 14TH 2023 FAILING WHICH YOU FIND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PER DAY. WILL ACCRUE. NO FURTHER AWARD COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $150 TO BE PAID TO THE VILLAGE. NO LATER THAN AUGUST. 14TH 2023. WE NEED THE. TAKE A MINUTE. YEAH ALRIGHT. I'M GONNA JUST BREAKER BLOW BECAUSE WE'VE HAD ISSUES WITH OKAY THERE. ROBERTS ALWAYS WORKED FOR ME. ALL RIGHT. I'M GONNA JUST CALL A RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES AND THEN WE'LL BE BACK. IT'S GOOD TO BE THE SHOW. IT'S GOOD TO BE THE SHERIFF. OKAY, CHOICE. ALRIGHT, WE'RE BACK ON. ALRIGHT GOOD. I'M GOING TO CALL US BACK TO WATER.IT'S NOW ABOUT 10 50. ON TUESDAY . UM JULY 18TH 2023. AND WE'LL CONTINUE WITH THE DOCK. IT, UM THE NEXT CASE IS A REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE. IT'S CASE NUMBER. 23072. RICKY AND RODRIGUEZ FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 9 14 SOUTHWEST 170TH AVENUE. WHAT DO WE GOT GOING ON THERE? THIS PROPERTY. UM. WAS CITED FOR VIOLATIONS UNDER, UH AND UP, UM , VEHICLES AT 91.32 ABANDONED SALVAGER JUNK PROPERTY AND AS WELL AS, UH SECTION 3-5 0.8 FOR STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES . UM MR RICKY RODRIGUEZ HAS BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH OUR CO COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT. UM AND HE'S EXPRESSED THAT HE'S THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, AND HE LEASES IT TO ATTENDANT WHO IS THE OWNER OF INOPERABLE, UM VAN THAT'S PARKED ON THE PROPERTY WITHOUT A LICENSE PLATE. AND A AND R V THAT'S ALSO PARKED ON THE PROPERTY WITHOUT A LICENSE PLATE OR PROPER REGISTRATION. UM WHICH IS WHY WE'RE CONSTITUTING THEM AS INOPERABLE. THE PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OF EACH VEHICLE APPEARED TO BE GOOD. AND ACCORDING TO MR RODRIGUEZ, UM THE TENANT IS STATING THAT THEIR OPERABLE UM THEY'RE JUST NOT REGISTERED AT THE TIME. OKAY SO MR RODRIGUEZ IS COORDINATING NOW WITH HIS TENANT TO GET THESE VEHICLES REGISTERED. SO THEY COULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE IN AN OPERABLE STATE AND THAT'LL CURE THE VIOLATION. SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, I WANTED TO GIVE HIM AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS TO COORDINATE WITH HIS TENANT AND RESOLVE THE ISSUE. UM WHAT YOU PUSH US OUT TO THE AUGUST 15TH. OKAY, TALKING. ALRIGHT, SO BYE. AUGUST 15TH. 2023.
[00:45:03]
ALRIGHT SO BASED UPON YOUR TESTIMONY, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND UM AND EXTEND THE THIS CASE, TOO. AUGUST 15TH 2023 AT 10 A.M. NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT, UM, NO ONE IS HERE ON BEHALF OF RICKY AND RODRIGUEZ. IN CASE NUMBER 23072. RIGHT LET'S SEE. THE NEXT ONE IS, UH, FLETCHER CASE. IT'S CASE NUMBER 11 ON THE DOCKET. IT'S UM CASE 22 DAYS, 102 ROLAND FLETCHER. AND MELISSA FLETCHER. AND THIS IS ALREADY. HAD THREE CONTINUANCES. YES. SO WHAT? WHAT'S. GOING ON RIGHT NOW WITH THIS PROPERTY. UM INITIALLY, IF WE BACKTRACK IT, THERE WAS A PERMIT. THAT WAS FILED WITH OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A SHED. ON THE PROPERTY. UM, NOW. AT THAT TIME DURING THE REVIEW PROCESS OF THEIR APPLICATION. UH, THE. IT WAS APPROVED BY OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUT ARE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT UM DENIED IT ON THE BASIS OF SOME NEW PROVISIONS IN OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION THAT THAT WE ADOPTED UM. THAT REMEMBER? YEAH LOCATION OF YES, IT DID NOT MEET THE SETBACKS THAT ARE REQUIRED UNDER RLD ARE NOW MISS FLETCHER'S ARGUMENT AT THAT TIME. WAS THAT ALTHOUGH RLD ARE, UH YOU KNOW WAS ADOPTED AND IT WAS NEVER TRANSLATED ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION THAT THERE WERE SETBACKS REQUIRED BECAUSE SHE WAS SOLELY BASICALLY INSTALLING THE NEW SHED IN PLACE OF IN THE SAME LOCATION OF AN OLD SHED THAT SHE HAD UM, YOU KNOW, NOW WE'VE BEEN GOING BACK AND FORTH HERE FOR QUITE SOME TIME. AS YOU COULD TELL BEING THAT WE'RE ON THE THIRD CONTINUANCE. UM BECAUSE INITIALLY, THE VARIANCES THAT WERE AVAILABLE TO HER WOULD HAVE ONLY ALLOTTED HER OF 50. VARIANTS ON THE REQUIREMENT OF THE CODE, WHICH WOULD HAVE MET THAT IT SHOULD HAVE TO AT LEAST MEET FIVE OR 5 FT SETBACK. BUT THAT WASN'T GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT SHE WOULD BE ABLE TO DO. JUST BASED ON THE LAYOUT OF HER PROPERTY. UM AND IN SPEAKING WITH WE'VE GONE THROUGH SOME TRANSITIONS AND OUR DEPARTMENT AND THEN SPEAKING WITH SOME OF OUR STAFF AND SUPERIORS THAT ARE IN PLACE. NOW. THEY'VE AGREED THAT WE COULD APPLY, SHE COULD APPLY FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANTS, WHICH WOULD BASICALLY A LOT. HER A LOT. DOES OUR STAFF TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. ON 100% VARIANTS , WHICH WOULD ALLOW HER TO HAVE THE SHED. WHERE SHE INITIALLY HAD THE OLD ONE, AND THAT WOULD UM, CURE THE VIOLATION. NOW SHE'S STILL IN THE SUBMITTAL PROCESS OF THIS. NOW ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANTS, AND THEY'VE GOT TO GET HER OWN SCHEDULE WITH THE P C. A. B. FOR APPROVAL. DO YOU REMEMBER WHETHER SHE ENLARGED THE. THE SHADOW OR WHETHER IT WAS LIKE A ONE FOR ONE. IT WAS A ONE FOR ONE REPLACEMENT. YEAH, YEAH. AND HER HER PROBLEM IF I REMEMBER WAS. THAT SHE HADN'T APPLIED FOR A PERMIT IN THE BEGINNING. IS THAT CORRECT? SHE DID SHE DID. SHE APPLIED AND WHAT HAPPENED IS IT GOT KICKED BACK BECAUSE IT WAS DENIED BY OUR PLANNING AND ZONING BECAUSE IT DIDN'T MEET THE OUT THE SETBACKS AND SHE HAD ALREADY HAD IT ON SCHEDULE TO HAVE IT DELIVERED AND INSTALLED.BY THE COMPANY THAT SHE GUESS PURCHASED THE SHED FROM AND SHE WENT FORWARD WITH THE WORK.
EITHER WAY, ALTHOUGH IT'S STILL AN OPEN PERMIT, BUT IT'S JUST HASN'T RECEIVED AN OFFICIAL APPROVAL FROM OUR FROM OUR PLANNING AND ZONING. UM SO. THAT'S WHERE WE CAME UP WITH THE VARIANTS, BUT YOU KNOW IT'S BEEN A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH BECAUSE SHE WANTED MORE THAN THE 50% AND AH GO AHEAD. I'M SORRY. WELL WHEN I'M WONDERING IS WHETHER YOU SEE THE VALUE OF HAVING AN ACTIVE CASE HERE OR NOT, I DON'T YEAH, ME THAT I SHOULD JUST DISMISS THIS CASE. AND IF YOU WANT TO BRING A CASE AGAINST YEAH, OKAY, THEN DO IT, OKAY? I MEAN, I AGREE. I HONESTLY WAS
[00:50:06]
GONNA, YEAH. YEAH. STILL I'M GOING TO DISMISS IT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND OKAY BACK IF YOU WANT. OKAY FAIR ENOUGH. YEAH. I WANTED TO GET SOME SOME, YOU KNOW, CLARIFICATION FROM YOU EITHER WAY, SO THAT THAT WOULD THAT WOULD WORK. ALRIGHT. I. I JUST DON'T SEE THAT. I MEAN, WE'VE CONTINUED IT NOW THREE TIMES AND I DOESN'T SOUND TO ME LIKE YOU'RE ALL THAT MUCH CLOSER TO RESOLVING IT, AND I DON'T KNOW THAT I COULD ADJUDICATED UNDERSTOOD. I AM LOOKING AT I MEAN, HMM. WHY ISN'T IT JUST CONTINUATION OF A NONCONFORMING USE. I DON'T KNOW. I HAVEN'T HEARD IT MAY BE ENOUGH EVIDENCE , BUT IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A VIABLE CASE TO ME, OKAY? OKAY.I'M GOING TO DISMISS THE CASE. AND I'LL SEND YOU AN ORDER TO THAT EFFECT. OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR. PUT IN THERE. WHY SO? OKAY? NEXT ONE IS CASE NUMBER 12 ON THE DOCKET ITS CASE TO 3040 VENTURE PARK ASSOCIATION INC. AND IT LOOKS LIKE THAT'S A VACANT LOT. WITH AN UNASSIGNED ADDRESS. NO, SIR. OKAY, SO, UM. THIS PROPERTY WAS INITIALLY AH WAS INITIATED. UM AT THE REQUEST OF OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. BACK IN. FEBRUARY 17TH OF 2023. UM. IT WAS A NOTICE OF VIOLATION THAT WAS ISSUED FOR VIOLATIONS UNDER SECTION AH! FORGIVE ME, 20. 21.7 FOR PERMITS. AND, UM.
REALLY? THE ISSUE WAS THERE WAS A SCHEDULE. THAT THE CONTRACTOR WAS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT SCHEDULE OF CERTIFIED INSPECTIONS FROM AN ENGINEER VALIDATING THAT A PUMP HOUSE THAT WAS BEING BUILT ON THE SITE. UM WAS, UH INSPECTED AND CERTIFYING THAT IT WAS BUILT FOR THE COLD AND IT WAS TO BE SUBMITTED TO OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. AND ARE BUILDING OFFICIAL WOULD HAVE WOULD VALIDATE THAT, UH, AUTHENTICATE THE RECORD AND THEN CONDUCT THE FINAL INSPECTION TO CLOSE THE PERMIT. THAT HAS YET TO BE SUBMITTED TO OUR DEPARTMENT AND AT THE AS A RESULT OF THIS MOVIE WE WENT TO HEARING ON MARCH 21ST 2023 AND RECEIVED A CONTINUANCE. THAT I BELIEVE PUSHED US TOO.
MAY. 2 MAY 15TH. YEAH SO AT THIS POINT, WHAT'S GOING ON IS OUR, UM OUR NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HAS BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH SHE'S STEPPED IN AND BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE CONTRACTOR WHO'S, UH ADVISED THAT THEY ARE GOING TO GET IN CONTACT WITH THE ENGINEER AND GET THIS INFORMATION OVER TO OUR DEPARTMENT SO WE CAN GET THIS PERMIT CLOSED OUT. BUT AT THE INSTRUCTION OF OUR BUILDING OFFICIAL I WANT TO GO AHEAD AND PURSUE A FINAL ORDER. UM IN ORDER TO WARRANT COMPLIANCE ON OR BEFORE THE NEXT HEARING. UM NOW IF WE FOLLOW THE PROCESS THAT YOU KNOW, WE TRADITIONALLY HAVE I HAVE ARE. PROPERTY APPRAISER RECORD MARK BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT ONE, REFLECTING THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. AS THE VENTURE PARK ASSOCIATION INC. UM ROB ME JUST ASK YOU THIS NOTICE OF THIS HEARING? YES, SIR. THEY DID, BECAUSE I DON'T SEE THAT IN THE IN THE. SO WE, WE DID SEND IT CERTIFIED. AND THEN WE ALSO SENT OUT THE. THE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE RESPONDENT VIA EMAIL. UM THROUGH OUR UH, ECONOMIC SPECIALIST DIRECTOR AND THEIR COMMUNICATION. OKAY UM, CAN YOU GET A COPY OF THAT? FOR MHM. FOR US TO PUT IN EVIDENCE BECAUSE RIGHT NOW, THE LAST. NOTICE OR I SEE IS FROM MAY 15TH MAY 15TH OKAY. FURTHER CONTINUANCE. OKAY LET'S GO AHEAD AND CONTINUE. GO AHEAD AND SUBMIT YOUR EVIDENCE, AND THEN WE'LL WELL. OKAY UP SO MARK BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT TWO. I HAVE THE NON COMPLIANCE REPORT
[00:55:08]
THAT WAS FILED BY OUR BUILDING OFFICIAL, UM, STATING THE REQUIREMENTS THAT UM, WERE NEEDED IN ORDER TO FACILITATE COMPLIANCE. AND AS I STATED, THEY NEED A CERTIFIED AFFIDAVIT FROM THEIR ENGINEER, UM VALIDATING THE INSPECTIONS AND THAT THE PUMP HOUSE WAS BUILT THE THAT ON THE EXHIBIT. YEAH AND THEN, UM, BEFORE MARK BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBITS THREE AND UH, FOR I HAVE THE ORIGINAL NOTICE OF VIOLATION. AH AS WELL AS THE CONTINUANCE. THAT WAS, UH.SCHEDULED FOR MAY. OKAY? AND THEN I HAVE MY AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE MARKING THE. THE ISSUANCE OF THE MOVIE AS WELL AS THE CONTINUANCE ORDER. UM, MARK BEFORE YOU AS EXHIBIT FIVE. NOW.
ALRIGHT WE DID HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A DELAY THERE. OBVIOUSLY THE CONTINUANCE WARRANTED IT TO COME BACK. UM AS OF I BELIEVE THE JUNE HEARING AND THEN WE'VE HAD A SERIES OF COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE CONTRACTOR. UM. I MEAN, WE. I'M TRYING TO LOOK BACK HERE IN THE EMAILS BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND, UH, YOU KNOW SERVICE PORTION FOR TODAY'S HEARING. GOOD WELL, LET ME LET ME SEE IF I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE TELLING ME. I'M LOOKING AT YOUR AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE AND IT SAYS BY POSTING A COPY OF SAID NOTICE. ON THE BULLETIN BOARD OF VILLAGE HALL ON JULY 7TH 2023. AND THAT WAS FOR TODAY'S HEARING. DOESN'T SAY THAT. YEAH. OKAY, BUT. BUT THE MARCH 28TH 1 WAS FOR A DIFFERENT HEARING. YEAH. OKAY SO WE STILL NEED SOME SORT OF NOTICE. OKAY TO THEM. UM, IS THAT IN YOUR FILE? MIGHT HAVE TO HAVE TO GO BACK AND CHECK. I MEAN, AS I STATED, I MEAN, THE CONTRACTORS EXPRESSED TO OUR DIRECTOR THAT THEY WERE GOING TO BE FACILITATING THIS CERTIFICATE OVER TO OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT. UM AND SHE'S KIND OF KEEPING TABS WITH THEM AND WORKING WITH THEM ON COORDINATING THAT. UM. OKAY I GUESS MY DECISION POINT IS WHETHER OR NOT I JUST CONTINUE IT FOR 30. LET'S JUST OR WHETHER WHETHER THEY DID HAVE NOTICE OF THE HEARING AND FAILED TO SHOW UP AND I CAN ADJUDICATED AND DO LET'S JUST DO. LET'S SEE IF WE CAN MOVE FORWARD THE CONTINUANCE. AND THEN IF THEY DO NOT FOLLOW THROUGH WITH OUR DIRECTOR ON THE ON THE REQUEST, THEN WE'LL BRING IT BACK. SO I'M GONNA I'M GONNA NOTE ON HERE THAT I'VE NOT. TAKEN THESE ITEMS INTO EVIDENCE. THAT YOU PRESENTED. IN OTHER WORDS, IT WILL BECOME A DO OVER IF I'M JUST GOING TO CONTINUE THE CASE UNDERSTOOD TO PRESENT THE EVIDENCE AGAIN. IF YES, SIR. IF IT GOES TO HEARING OKAY, BUT THEN YOU GOTTA GIVE THEM NOTICE OF YES, AUGUST 15TH YEAR. I JUST THINK THE TIMELINE AND HOWLS STRETCHED OUT. EVERYTHING'S GONE. IT'S PROBABLY GOING A LITTLE CONVOLUTED, SO WE'LL GET AN ADDRESS.
OKAY? LET'S SEE. WE GOT A COUPLE MORE HERE. TOOK CARE OF THE MCKNIGHT. ALRIGHT, SO THE NEXT ONE IS, UM. OKAY, ONE MORE. IT'S THE VEGA CASE. IT'S CASE NUMBER 23063. TECH WELL AND MARIA VEGA
[01:00:19]
FOR THE PROPERTY AT 14 703 SOUTHWEST LITTLE INDIAN AVENUE, AND THAT WAS CONTINUED TO TODAY.YEAH. SO IN THIS CASE. I'VE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH, UH AND TECH WELL, VEGA. HMM. THERE WAS INITIALLY THREE INOPERABLE VEHICLES. TWO OF THEM WOULD HAVE WHICH ARE ARE HIS HAVE OFFICIALLY BEEN REGISTERED IN OUR IN AN OPERABLE STATE. HE HAS ONE MORE THAT BELONGS TO A SIBLING WHO WAS OUT OF STATE DUE TO WORK AND THERE. UM I GUESS THE ARRANGEMENT IS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE IN THE BEGINNING OF NEXT MONTH. AND WE'LL HAVE THE VEHICLE OFFICIALLY REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY. HE'S JUST BEEN KEEPING IT THERE AS A SAFE KEEP FOR A SIBLING OF HIS, UM SO I WANTED TO GIVE HIM ADDITIONAL TIME TO FACILITATE COMPLIANCE ON THIS, AND IF WE CAN JUST GET A CONTINUANCE TO THE FOLLOWING HEARING UM AND WE SHOULD BE WE SHOULD BE GOOD TO GO. ALL RIGHT , AND I HAVE NOT HEARD ANY EVIDENCE. I DON'T THINK IN THIS CASE, ALTHOUGH I THINK DIDN'T MR VEGA APPEAR UH, MY CONFUSING IT WAS NO HE DID NOT KNOW HE DID NOT. ALRIGHT SO I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND GRANT A SECOND CONTINUANCE IN THIS MATTER. SOUNDS LIKE HE'S HOPEFULLY THERE PRETTY CLOSE TO GETTING IT RESOLVED.
ALRIGHT ANYTHING ELSE TO COME BEFORE US TODAY? THAT'LL BE IT. ALRIGHT GREAT. OKAY WE WILL SEE
[NEXT HEARING DATE]
YOU THEN. AUGUST 15TH 2023 HERE IN CHAMBERS. THANK* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.