Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

I CAN. PERFECT. THANK YOU, TOM.

[00:00:01]

APPRECIATE IT. I'LL CALL TO ORDER.

[CALL TO ORDER]

ROLL CALL.

GOOD EVENING, CHAIR PALMER.

PRESENT VICE CHAIR, MILEY.

PRESENT BOARD MEMBER.

PRESSLER HERE.

BOARD MEMBER ON SAGA HERE.

BOARD MEMBER SIA HAYEK WILL BE JOINING US.

I'LL BE THERE SHORTLY.

THANK YOU. BOARD MEMBER WATSON HERE.

BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS AND MEMBER SEACREST.

REMEMBER, SEACREST IS NOT PRESENT FOR THE RECORD.

ROLL CALL IS COMPLETE.

THAT'S THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BEFORE INVOCATION.

ARE WE TURNING IT AROUND? YEAH. OKAY. WE HAVE OUR INVOCATION BY BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS, AFTER WHICH WE'LL DO OUR PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE STAMP, PLEASE. NOW, HEADS.

MY FATHER, GOD IN HEAVEN.

WE COME NOW WITH MANY THINGS FOR LIFE, HEALTH AND STRENGTH, FOR BEING SO GOOD AND SO KIND TO US.

WE COME TO YOU IN THE ARMS OF MANNER THAT WE KNOW HOW WE COME TO YOU.

A BUSINESS OF IMPORTANCE THAT THE WORDS OUR MOUTHS AND THE MEDITATION OF OUR HEARTS BE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SIGHT OR LORD, OUR STRENGTH AND OUR REDEEMER AND THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS, WE PRAY.

AMEN. PLEASE REMAIN STANDING FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

AND MAYBE. SEE THAT. THANK YOU.

GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.

I WANT TO JUST DO A FEW HOUSEKEEPING RULES.

I'M GOING TO ASK EVERYBODY TO MUTE YOUR PHONES WHILE WE'RE IN DELIBERATION.

AND IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS, PLEASE.

EVERYTHING THAT YOU NEED IS OVER BY OUR BEAUTIFUL POLICE OFFICERS.

RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU NEED TO WRITE SOMETHING DOWN YOU WANT TO HAVE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.

PLEASE FOLLOW THOSE RULES.

THANK YOU. BOARD MEMBERS.

WHEN YOU NEED TO SPEAK, I WILL RECOGNIZE YOUR.

YOU TAKE YOUR NAMEPLATE UPSIDE DOWN, YOU WILL WAIT TO BE RECOGNIZED.

IF I DON'T RECOGNIZE THAT, THERE WOULD BE NO SPEAKING OUT OF TURN.

OK. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS DONE DECENT AND IN ORDER.

THANK YOU AGAIN.

[APPROVAL OF AGENDA ]

NOW WE'LL HAVE APPROVAL OF OUR AGENDA.

CAN I GET A MOTION FOR OUR APPROVAL? FOR THE APPROVAL OF AGENDA? I MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA SECOND.

OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR.

ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY OPPOSERS? OK. SEEING NONE.

ALL RIGHT. MOTION PASSED.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES.

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

CAN I GET A MOTION FOR THE MINUTES? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES SO I GET A SECOND.

THANK YOU. ALL IN FAVOR? I SEEING ALL ANY OPPOSERS.

SEEING NONE.

THE MOTION PASSED.

OK WE'RE GOING TO MOVE RIGHT INTO OUR REGULAR AGENDA.

AT THIS TIME, I'M GOING TO TURN THIS APPLICATION NUMBER SP A-23-004

[1.  APPLICATION NO. SPA-23-004: A REQUEST TO AMEND THE PRESERVE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN (PAMP) OF THE SANDY OAKS PUD APPROVED SITE PLAN AND TO FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE TERRA LAGO PUD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN AND TERRA LAGO, LLC.]

TO OUR OUR ATTORNEY, MR. WADE. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

GOOD EVENING, BOARD MEMBERS.

GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.

I'M ACTUALLY GOING TO BE HANDLING THIS FIRST ITEM, BUT I WANTED TO GIVE YOU ALL AN INTRODUCTION FIRST.

I IMAGINE YOU ALL MAY BE HERE ABOUT ONE OR THE OTHER ONES, PERHAPS OTHER THAN THIS FIRST ONE HERE, BUT WE'RE GOING TO BE FOLLOWING A PROCEDURE ON ALL OF THESE ITEMS GOING IN A PARTICULAR ORDER.

AND THERE'S GOING TO BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU ALL TO BE ABLE TO HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MATTERS THAT YOU'RE HERE FOR TONIGHT.

SO THE WAY IT'S GENERALLY GOING TO GO IS I AM GOING TO GO THROUGH A LITTLE SPEECH EXPLAINING WHAT WHAT'S TO BE

[00:05:01]

CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD MEMBERS AS THEY MAKE THEIR DECISION.

IT MAY SOUND A LITTLE REDUNDANT WHEN I DO IT THREE TIMES AS WE GO THROUGH THIS.

I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT IN ADVANCE.

KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE ARE FOLKS OUT IN THE PUBLIC HERE TAKING IT DOWN WITH THE COURT REPORTER AND SO IT'S ALL GOT TO BE IN THE RECORD TO MAKE THINGS WORK WELL. BUT THE WAY IT'S GENERALLY GOING TO GO IS WE'RE GOING TO INTRODUCE EACH ITEM.

I'M GOING TO GIVE A LITTLE SPEECH EXPLAINING THE STANDARDS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO APPLY.

THEN STAFF IS GOING TO GIVE A PRESENTATION.

ALL RIGHT. CONCERNING THAT ITEM.

THEN THE APPLICANT IS GOING TO PUT ON A PRESENTATION CONCERNING THAT ITEM.

IN EACH OF THOSE INSTANCES, THE BOARD MEMBERS ARE GOING TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK STAFF QUESTIONS, ASKED THE APPLICANT QUESTIONS AND SO ON.

THEN THE CHAIR WILL OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND THAT WILL BE THE TIME WHEN YOU'LL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THAT ITEM AND YOU WILL HAVE 3 MINUTES TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS ANY THOUGHTS YOU HAVE CONCERNING THAT ITEM, AND THEN THEY WILL PROCEED AND MAKE A DECISION ON IT.

SO WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD.

DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING BE HEARD TONIGHT IN CASE YOU'RE HERE? JUST WANTED TO. AH, YES, THERE WAS JUST IN CASE ANYBODY HAPPENED TO BE HERE.

THERE WAS. THERE WAS AN ADDITIONAL ITEM ADVERTISED FOR TONIGHT.

A VARIANCE THAT IS NOT ON THIS AGENDA.

IT IS NOT BEING HEARD TONIGHT.

IT WILL BE RE NOTICED.

THANK YOU, ALETHIA. SO WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND START WITH THE FIRST ITEM.

THE FIRST AGENDA ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION IS APPLICATION NUMBER SPA DASH 20 3-004.

A REQUEST TO AMEND THE PRESERVE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE SAN DIEGO P.D.

APPROVED SITE PLAN AND TO FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE TERRA LARGO PAD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN AND TERRA LAGO, LLC.

SO THE FIRST STEP IN THIS QUASI JUDICIAL PROCESS IS IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE TONIGHT, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT OR ANY STAFF OR WITNESSES OR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM OK LIKE TO SPEAK TO IT AND OFFER EVIDENCE CONCERNING IT.

I WOULD ASK THAT YOU RAISE YOUR HAND NOW AND BE SWORN BY THE CLERK.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE FOR THIS FIRST ITEM? I DON'T SEE ANYONE.

SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND PROCEED.

SO THIS APPLICATION, AS ARE THE OTHER TWO TONIGHT.

IS QUASI JUDICIAL IN NATURE.

WHAT THAT MEANS IS IT REQUIRES THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD AND IT COMPLIED WITH CERTAIN PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE ESTABLISHED IN FLORIDA LAW.

QUASI JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE LESS FORMAL THAN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE, FOR EXAMPLE, CIRCUIT COURT, BUT THEY'RE MORE FORMAL THAN THE NORMAL DECISION MAKING WE HAVE AT OUR MEETINGS. AND THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW BASIC STANDARDS OF NOTICE AND DUE PROCESS.

THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT THING FOR EVERYONE TO UNDERSTAND, PARTICULARLY AS A REMINDER FOR OUR BOARD, THE BOARD'S DECISION ON THIS ITEM AND THE NEXT TWO ITEMS THEY WILL CONSIDER HAS TO BE MADE BASED ON COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL FACT BASED TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD IN ITS DELIBERATION AND VOTING ON THIS ITEM.

PURE SPECULATION OR MERE OPINION, NOT BASED ON COMPETENT FACTS, CANNOT BE LEGALLY CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD IN WEIGHING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE APPLICATION TESTIMONY WITH FACT BASED SUPPORT SUCH AS MINUTES, SURVEYS, ENGINEERING REPORTS AND THE LIKE MAY BE CONSIDERED COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

IF YOU INTEND TO SPEAK, PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND WHEN YOU COME FORWARD.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME CLEARLY FOR THE RECORD, WHETHER OR NOT YOU'VE BEEN SWORN AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS OR INTERESTS IN THE MATTER, AND WE WOULD ASK YOU THAT YOU ALSO SUBMIT A SPEAKER CARD FOR IT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RECORD.

AT THIS TIME.

MADAM CLERK, HAS THIS ITEM BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED? YES, IT'S BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED IN THE RECORD.

INCLUDES DOCUMENTATION TO THAT EFFECT.

THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, IF ANY BOARD MEMBER HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONCERNING THIS FIRST MATTER THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THEM FROM VOTING ON THIS ITEM, I WOULD ASK YOU TO PLEASE DISCLOSE IT FOR THE RECORD.

COMPLETE THE REQUIRED VOTING CONFLICT FORM AND PROVIDE IT TO THE CLERK.

IS THERE ANYONE WHO NEEDS TO DISCLOSE A CONFLICT ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE. WE'LL MOVE ON IF THERE'S ANY BOARD MEMBER WHO'S HAD ANY EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, AND THAT'S COMMUNICATIONS WITH ANYONE OUTSIDE OF THIS MEETING OR A SITE VISIT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

CONCERNING THIS ITEM, I WOULD ASK YOU TO PLEASE DISCLOSE IT AND IDENTIFY WHO YOU MAY HAVE SPOKEN TO OR COMMUNICATED WITH CONCERNING THIS

[00:10:03]

ITEM AND THE SUBSTANCE OF THAT COMMUNICATION.

ANYONE CONCERNING THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE. WE'LL PROCEED ON AT THIS POINT.

TURN IT OVER TO STAFF FOR PRESENTATION OF THIS ITEM AND IT HAPPENS TO BE ON THIS ITEM.

I WILL BE PRESENTING IT.

SO BOARD MEMBERS, THIS IS AND I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND SHARE TO THE SCREEN HERE REAL QUICK, DARYN, IF I CAN. GIVE ME JUST ONE SECOND.

THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU TONIGHT.

IT'S KIND OF A. TECHNICAL PAPERWORK CLEANUP AMENDMENT.

WHAT IT IS, IS AN AMENDMENT OF A PAMPER PRESERVE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SANDY OAKS.

BUT THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE TERRA LAGO POD PROJECT WAY BACK WHEN THE MASTER PLAN FOR TERRA LAGO AND PHASE ONE, A OF TERRA LAGO, CAME BEFORE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL, A PORTION OF THAT CONTEMPLATED A ROAD RUNNING THROUGH TO AMERICAN STREET.

LET ME SEE IF I CAN ZOOM UP ANY FURTHER HERE.

YOU'LL SEE.

RIGHT HERE, THIS ROAD SEGMENT RIGHT HERE.

THAT PIECE IS ACTUALLY ON A LITTLE PORTION OF THE SANDY OAKES PAD.

ALL RIGHT. SO THE DEVELOPERS OF TERRA LAGO HAVE GOTTEN WITH THE THE SAN DIEGO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, WHICH HAS CONTROL OVER THAT LAND AND WORKED OUT FOR THE 62 FEET, THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THAT TO BE DEDICATED TO THE VILLAGE.

AND. AND THEN TERRA LAGO WOULD ACTUALLY DO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THAT ROAD THE EXACT SAME WAY THEY'RE CONSTRUCTING THE REST OF THE ROADS PURSUANT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR ALL OF TERRA LAGO.

WHAT THIS ITEM TONIGHT IS, IS JUST A PAPERWORK CLEANUP TO ACCEPT THAT TO ACCEPT THAT THAT SITE PLAN CHANGE TO SANDY OAKS TO EFFECTUATE THAT.

SO WITH THAT, I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PERMIT AMENDMENT THAT IS BEFORE YOU TONIGHT.

THIS WILL BE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? YES, MA'AM. HI.

YES. MY NAME IS RENITA PRESSLER.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

I SEE THAT THIS IS A PRESERVE AREA, AND THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE SET ASIDE AS OPEN SPACE.

IS THAT. COULD YOU CLARIFY FOR ME AND ALSO THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY? IT'S 62 FEET LONG.

I SEE THAT.

IF THAT'S CORRECT.

BUT I DON'T SEE THE DEPTH OR EXACTLY HOW MUCH.

SO THIS IS OPEN SPACE THAT WILL BE FROM SANDY OAKS, A PRESERVE AREA THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE PRESERVED.

HOWEVER MUCH LAND THIS IS.

LET ME GO AHEAD.

THANK YOU FOR THAT, MR. PRESSLER. LET ME SHOW YOU ANOTHER PIECE HERE.

GIVE ME ONE SECOND TO SWITCH WHAT I AM SHARING.

SO AS I MENTIONED THE THE THE EVALUATION OF OF.

OF THE ALIGNMENT OF THAT ROAD AND SO ON ALREADY OCCURRED.

WITH RESPECT TO THE THE PWD OR PARDON ME, THE APPROVAL OF TERRA LAGO, PHASE ONE A.

IT GOING THROUGH THIS PIECE HERE AND THIS IS JUST A CLEANUP AMENDMENT, BUT I THINK THIS WILL HELP CLARIFY THINGS A LITTLE BIT FURTHER HERE.

THIS IS AN AERIAL FROM THE MARTIN COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S SITE.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PORTION OF THIS OF THIS AREA HERE THAT RUNS ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY.

IT IS NOT AN AREA THAT IS WOODED OR PRISTINE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

IT'S AN EXISTING DIRT ROAD AND AND SOME DRAINAGE FACILITIES THERE THAT ARE GOING TO BE ENCOMPASSED IN THE NEW DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WILL GO ALONG WITH THIS ON THE.

WHEN TARA LAGO COMES IN AND DEVELOPS AND IMPROVES THAT ENTIRE PIECE THERE.

SO IT'S NOT GOING INTO ANY PORTION OF THAT AREA THAT THAT HAS ANY PRISTINE LANDS OR ANYTHING LIKE THIS, IT'S AN EXISTING DRIVEWAY EFFECTIVELY.

COULD YOU CLARIFY THE SIZE IS 62 FEET LONG? CORRECT. THAT THE DEPTH IS 62 FEET?

[00:15:02]

OH, DEPTH IS 62 FEET.

THEN WHAT IS THE LENGTH? THE LENGTH OF THAT SEGMENT IS ACCORDING TO THE.

WELL, PARDON ME. LET ME LET ME TAKE A LOOK AT ONE OTHER.

DOCUMENT THERE, BECAUSE WE DO ACTUALLY WE SHARE THAT PIECE FOR YOU.

EXCUSE ME ONE SECOND.

THIS IS THE THE SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION FROM THE INSTRUMENT, DEDICATING IT TO THE VILLAGE.

IT'S A LENGTH OF 658 FEET AND A DEPTH OF SIX.

COULD YOU REPEAT THAT? SURE. YEAH, IT IS. IT'S A LENGTH OF ROUGHLY 658 FEET AND A DEPTH OF 62 FEET.

OKAY, MAYBE I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING.

THIS IS LAND THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE OPEN SPACE.

650 ACRES.

NO, I'M SORRY. THAT IS FEET 658 FEET LONG.

OK 658 FEET LONG AND 62 FEET DEEP.

CORRECT. THAT BELONGS TO THE VILLAGE THAT THAT LAND ACTUALLY BELONGS TO THE SANDY OAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.

I MEAN, IT'S JUST DEDICATED TO THE VILLAGE, ACTUALLY.

ISN'T THERE A CONTRACT IN THERE THAT SAYS THAT'S BETWEEN THE VILLAGE AND THE DEVELOPER? I DON'T KNOW IF I PRINTED THAT, BUT SO IN THE AGENDA ITEM AND THANK YOU FOR THAT, THERE ARE ADDITIONAL BACKUP MATERIALS THAT THAT AREN'T THAT AREN'T BEFORE YOU FOR APPROVAL TONIGHT.

THEY WILL BE GOING BEFORE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL THAT GO ALONG WITH IT.

AND ONE OF THEM IS A DEED FROM THE SANDY OAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO THE VILLAGE.

SO THAT SEGMENT THERE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS GOING TO BE DEEDED FROM THE SANDY OAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO THE VILLAGE.

THEN THERE IS ANOTHER AGREEMENT IN THERE WHEREBY TARA LAGO IS AGREEING TO BUILD THE ROAD THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED FOR PHASE ONE, A OF TARA LAGO, TO IMPLEMENT THAT APPROVED PLAN.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANSWER.

ABSOLUTELY. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. KELLEN, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU NEED TO ADD? NO, SIR. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

ALL RIGHT. MADAM CHAIR.

STAFFS MADE THEIR PRESENTATION.

APPLICANT HAS NOTHING FURTHER.

AND YOU'VE ASKED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND THERE APPEARS NOT TO BE ANY.

SO I WOULD. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ITEM.

WHAT'S THE PLEASURE OF THE BOARD? I'LL MOVE. I'LL MOVE FOR STAFF APPROVAL OF THE ITEM IN A SECOND.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

IT'S BEEN MOVED IN SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.

ALL RIGHT. OKAY, OK, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO OUR NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS APPLICATION NUMBER SP, DASH 22,

[2.  APPLICATION NO. SP-22-036: A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR GRIND HARD AMMUNITION PROJECT, LOCATED THE NORTH SIDE OF SW FARM ROAD AT ITS JUNCTION WITH NW SILVER FOX ROAD. PARCEL APPROXIMATELY 19.17 ACRES IN SIZE.]

DASH 036, A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR GRIND HARD AMMUNITION PROJECT LOCATED LOCATED THE NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHWEST FARM ROAD AND ITS JUNCTION WITH NEW NORTHWEST SOUTH FOX ROAD PARCEL APPROXIMATELY 19.17 ACRES IN SIZE.

OKAY. SO.

OH, YEAH. I'M SO SORRY, MADAM CHAIR.

I'LL GO AHEAD AND ASK AGAIN WITH REGARD TO THIS ITEM THAT THE CHAIR JUST ANNOUNCED, IF ANY INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT, ANY INTERVENORS, STAFF, WITNESSES OR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO PLAN TO SPEAK OR OFFER TESTIMONY DURING THIS PUBLIC HEARING, AND THAT'S CONCERNING THE GRIND AMMUNITION PROJECT. PLEASE RISE AND BE SWORN BY THE VILLAGE CLERK.

ARE YOU GOING TO STAND BY? PLAYS DRIBBLE.

PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HANDS.

DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT YOU WILL TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

THIS ITEM APPLICATION NUMBER SP DASH 22, DASH 036.

[00:20:02]

CONCERNING THE GRINDROD AMMUNITION PROJECT IS ALSO QUASI JUDICIAL IN NATURE, WHICH REQUIRES THIS PUBLIC HEARING COMPLY WITH PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED IN FLORIDA LAW. QUASI JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE LESS FORMAL THAN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A CIRCUIT COURT, BUT ARE MORE FORMAL THAN A NORMAL PCB MEETING AND MUST FOLLOW BASIC STANDARDS OF NOTICE AND DUE PROCESS.

THE BOARD'S DECISION MUST BE MADE BASED UPON COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL FACT BASED TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD IN ITS DELIBERATION AND VOTING ON THIS ITEM.

PURE SPECULATION OR MERE OPINION, NOT BASED ON COMPETENT FACTS, CANNOT BE LEGALLY CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD IN WEIGHING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE APPLICATION TESTIMONY WITH FACT BASED SUPPORT SUCH AS MINUTES, SURVEYS, ENGINEERING REPORTS AND THE LIKE MAY BE CONSIDERED COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

IF YOU INTEND TO SPEAK, PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND WHEN YOU COME FORWARD.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME CLEARLY FOR THE RECORD, WHETHER OR NOT YOU'VE BEEN SWORN IN AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS OR INTERESTS IN THE MATTER.

WE ALSO ASK THAT YOU SUBMIT A SPEAKER CARD TO INCLUDE WITH THE RECORD.

MADAM CLERK, HAS THIS ITEM BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED? YES, THE ITEM WAS PROPERLY ADVERTISED IN THE RECORD.

INCLUDES DOCUMENTATION TO THAT EFFECT.

THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, IF ANY BOARD MEMBER HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THEM FROM VOTING ON THIS ITEM.

PLEASE DISCLOSE IT FOR THE RECORD NOW AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED VOTING CONFLICT FORM AND PROVIDE IT TO THE VILLAGE CLERK.

ANY MEMBER OF THE BOARD NEED TO DISCLOSE A CONFLICT ON THIS ITEM.

HEARING NONE. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND PROCEED.

IF ANY BOARD MEMBER HAS HAD ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION, AS A REMINDER, THAT'S ANY COMMUNICATION WITH ANYONE CONCERNING THIS ITEM OUTSIDE OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING OR MADE A SITE VISIT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, PLEASE DISCLOSE THAT BY IDENTIFYING THE SUBJECT OF THE COMMUNICATION, THE IDENTITY OF THE PERSON, GROUP OR ENTITY WITH WHOM YOU THE COMMUNICATION TOOK PLACE AND ANY CORRESPONDENCE YOU MAY HAVE RECEIVED.

IS THERE ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT NEED TO BE DISCLOSED? YES, MA'AM. I HAD ONE CONVERSATION WITH A RESIDENT IN INDIAN TOWN RESIDENT RONNIE HATAWAY, AND ONE CONVERSATION WITH A VILLAGE COUNCIL MEMBER, JANET HERNANDEZ.

THANK YOU, MA'AM. YES, SIR.

YES. I'VE HAD EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WITH MR. BRANDON ROTH, WHO'S THE ARCHITECT FOR FOUR GRAND HARD AMMO AND THE OWNERS THAT ARE SITTING IN THE AUDIENCE.

I MADE A SITE VISIT TO THEIR FACILITY IN STUART, FLORIDA, YESTERDAY TO EXAMINE THEIR PROPERTY.

AND JUST FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND HAVING EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS OR MAKING A SITE VISIT ARE LEGAL AND THEY'RE TOTALLY PERMITTED.

THE LAW REQUIRES SIMPLY THAT THEY BE DISCLOSED FOR THE PUBLIC AND REQUIRES THAT THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ULTIMATELY CONSIDER THE EVIDENCE THAT IS PRESENTED IN THIS MEETING.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER DISCLOSURES? HERE ARE NONE. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON.

AND MADAM CHAIR, I WOULD TURN IT OVER TO YOU TO TURN IT OVER TO STAFF FOR THEIR PRESENTATION.

OKAY. I JUST WANT TO ASK.

I SEE SOME LADIES STANDING IN THE AUDIENCE.

AND AS I TELL MY STUDENTS, I LIKE FOR THE GENTLEMAN TO ALLOW.

THERE'S A YOUNG LADY OVER HERE.

YOU? FINE. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT.

JUST MAKING SURE THAT WE ALWAYS REMEMBER.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

SO YOU CAN COME BACK AND SIT DOWN.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

NOTHING BETTER THAN A LITTLE LAUGHTER, RIGHT? OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO TURN THIS OVER TO THE STAFF.

YES. LET THE RECORD SHOW.

GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR.

VICE CHAIR. MOLLY AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.

FOR THE RECORD, ALTHEA JEFFERSON, DIRECTOR.

TONIGHT, WE'RE BRINGING YOU THIS CASE, WHICH IS A MAJOR SITE PLAN APPLICATION.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR A PROPOSED AMMUNITION MANUFACTURING.

FACILITY AS WELL AS STORAGE.

THE STORAGE ITSELF IS APPROXIMATELY 800 SQUARE FEET AND THE BUILDING IS 26,116 SQUARE FEET.

IT'S A ONE STORY BUILDING.

WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO TURN OVER TO OUR PROJECT PLANNER, WHO IS MR. JEFF ADAMS REPRESENTING.

TRANS SYSTEMS AND THE VILLAGE FOR REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION AS THE PROJECT PLANNER.

THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, EVERYBODY, AGAIN.

JEFF KATIMS KNOW WHAT? I'M JUST GOING TO PLUG THIS IN AS MY BATTERY IS ABOUT TO DIE.

[00:25:17]

WHILE HE PLUGS IN. I'D LIKE TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT BOARD MEMBER SU HAYEK ARRIVED IN PERSON AT 624.

HE PREVIOUSLY JOINED BY ZOOM.

HERE WE GO. THIS THING'S NORMALLY GOOD FOR, LIKE, 8 HOURS, SO IT'S SURPRISED ME.

OK. WE START BY SHOWING YOU THE SITE AND THE AREA AROUND IT, THE THE PROPOSED AMMUNITION FACTORIES ON THE SITE THAT'S SHOWN IN ORANGE.

WE'LL SHOW YOU A MORE DETAILED VERSION CLOSER UP.

BUT THIS IS JUST TO SHOW YOU THE GENERAL AREA.

YOU CAN SEE THAT THE VILLAGE BOUNDARY IS IN RED, ILLUSTRATED ON THE TO THE SOUTH OR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

THE CO-GENERATION PLAN IS UP THERE IN THE TOP LEFT CORNER, AND THERE'S A 475 ACRE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH WITH A LOT OF WETLANDS THAT BORDERED THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY.

THIS IS A CLOSER UP VERSION, AND WE CAN SEE THAT IT'S A 19 PLUS ACRE PROPERTY OF WHICH A LITTLE OVER 17 ARE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FARM ROAD, WHICH IS THE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WHERE THE FACILITY IS PROPOSED.

THERE'S A SMALL PORTION, A WEDGE SHAPED PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.

IT'S UNDER THE THE SAME PROPERTY, UNDER THE SAME OWNERSHIP TO THE SOUTH OF THE ROAD.

AND THERE ARE NO IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS FACILITY PROPOSED ON THAT PIECE.

THE SITE'S ABOUT 1300 FEET, A LITTLE MORE THAN A QUARTER MILE FROM EAST TO WEST AND VARIES BETWEEN 400 AND ABOUT 650 FEET FROM NORTH TO SOUTH.

THE ZONING AND THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY ARE BOTH LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

AND THIS IS THE SITE PLAN, AND IT'S HARD TO MAKE OUT DETAILS AT THIS SCALE.

BUT WHAT YOU CAN SEE IS THE THE MAIN MANUFACTURING BUILDING, WHICH IS THE BIG RECTANGLE THAT IS ABOUT 26,116 SQUARE FEET OF THAT UP.

THE PORTION THAT'S DEMARCATED ALL THE WAY TO THE LEFT SIDE IS STORAGE.

THE REST OF IT IS THE THE WHERE THE MANUFACTURING AND OTHER OPERATIONS TAKE PLACE.

AND WE'LL SHOW YOU A FLOOR PLAN ON A FURTHER SLIDE.

BUT WHAT YOU CAN GET FROM THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE FACTORY BUILDING AND THE LOCATION OF THE EXPLOSIVES STORAGE AND BY REGULATION, ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS AND NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION.

THOSE THOSE AMMUNITION LOCKERS, WHICH THEY CALL MAGAZINES.

IT'S A TERM OF ART THAT THEY USE.

THEY HAVE TO BE SEPARATED FROM THE BUILDING BY A CERTAIN DISTANCE FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.

THERE ARE FOUR LOW EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINES WHERE THEY WOULD BE STORING GUNPOWDER AND ONE HIGH EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINE, WHICH IS SEPARATED TO THE TOP FROM THE FOUR ON THE BOTTOM.

THAT WOULD BE FOR HIGH EXPLOSIVES.

AND THEY HAVE A PARKING FACILITY WITH LOADING DOCKS THAT ARE GOING TO BE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THAT BUILDING.

AND THE REST IS OPEN SPACE AND STORM WATER RETENTION AND OPEN SPACE.

THESE ARE RENDERINGS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.

I THINK THAT THEY DO A PRETTY GOOD JOB OF ILLUSTRATING WHAT THE BUILDING IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE.

IGNORE THE LANDSCAPING THAT HAS NO BEARING ON WHAT'S ACTUALLY PROPOSED.

I THINK THAT WAS JUST ARTISTIC LICENSE.

SO THE BUILDING ITSELF IS WHAT YOU SHOULD REALLY BE LOOKING AT HERE.

AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THE TOP THE TOP DRAWING IS THE SOUTH FACING OR FRONT ELEVATION.

THE LOADING DOCKS ARE ON THE FAR END TO THE LEFT, THE MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE OFFICE AND ALL THAT IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE.

THE ONE BELOW THAT IN THE MIDDLE ON THE LEFT SHOWS THE EAST ELEVATION.

THE ONE BELOW THAT IS THE BACK TO SIDES OF THE BUILDING.

[00:30:05]

AND IF YOU GO ALL THE WAY TO THE RIGHT, THAT LONE IMAGE THERE IS THE LOADING DOCKS.

THAT'S THE FRONT ELEVATION ON THE ON THE WEST SIDE.

THE FLOOR PLAN IS IT TAKES UP TWO SLIDES.

SO THIS IS THE EAST HALF OF IT.

AND I INTERPRETED WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THESE DIFFERENT AREAS AND THE APPLICANT CAN CAN CORRECT ME WHEN IT'S THEIR TURN IF I'M MISLABELED ANYTHING.

BUT ESSENTIALLY THEY HAVE OFFICE FUNCTIONS ON THE BOTTOM.

MANUFACTURING ON TOP OF THAT.

AND THEN AS YOU MOVE TO THE LEFT ASSEMBLY AND THEN THE CONTINUATION OF THE FLOOR PLAN, WHICH IS THE PACKAGING, THE LOADING AND MATERIAL STORAGE AND THEN THE PRODUCT STORAGE ALL THE WAY TO THE LEFT.

THIS IS AN IMAGE SHARED BY THE APPLICANT THAT'S REPRESENTATIVE OF A STORAGE MAGAZINE.

ESSENTIALLY, THESE ARE BUILT TO FEDERAL REGULATIONS SPECIFICALLY FOR THE STORAGE OF EXPLOSIVES.

AND THERE'S DIFFERENT RATINGS THAT ARE ASSIGNED TO THESE BASED UPON THE TYPE OF PROTECTION THEY OFFER, WHICH IN TURN IS BASED UPON THE TYPE OF EXPLOSIVES THAT WOULD BE STORED WITHIN.

THIS IS A BLAST RADIUS EXHIBIT.

AND WHAT THIS SHOWS, THERE ARE SEVERAL CONCENTRIC RINGS AND THEY EACH REPRESENT THE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN ANYWHERE WHERE EXPLOSIVES ARE STORED OR WORKED ON, WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY THE ENTIRE SITE AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS AND ROADS.

SO THE THE CIRCLES ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, YOU CAN SEE THERE'S ONE IN RED THAT'S FOR THE HIGH EXPLOSIVE STORAGE.

AND THE FURTHEST THERE'S 1 TO 3 CONCENTRIC RINGS.

THE ONE THAT'S FURTHEST OUT IS ESSENTIALLY THE ONE THAT IS SEPARATION FROM OTHER INHABITED BUILDINGS THAT ARE OFFSITE AND AND PUBLIC ROADWAYS.

THE LOW EXPLOSIVE STORAGE, WHICH IS TO THE BOTTOM OF THAT, HAS A SEPARATE SET OF CONCENTRIC RINGS, WHICH ARE HARD TO SEE BECAUSE THEY'RE GRAYISH, BUT THEY ALSO ARE FULLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE PROPERTY AND DON'T IMPACT FARM ROAD OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY.

THE BUILDING ITSELF HAS THE SAME THREE RINGS AROUND IT.

AND IF YOU LOOK AT THAT, YOU SEE THAT UNDER THE WORST CASE SCENARIO, WHICH IS BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF EXPLOSIVES THAT THE APPLICANT HAS STATED ON THIS DRAWING, THAT THEY'RE GOING TO STORE, THAT THE THE FURTHEST BLAST RADIUS IS IS FURTHER THAN IT NEEDS TO BE FROM FARM ROAD.

AND IT'S FULLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE SITE, EXCEPT ABOUT 75 FEET AT ITS MOST EXTREME ON THE NORTH SIDE, WHICH WOULD COINCIDE WITH SOME WETLANDS.

THIS IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

THERE'S EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSED AT THE ENTRANCE ALONG FARM ROAD AND ALONG THE DRIVE INTO THE SITE.

THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FARM ROAD WILL BE LANDSCAPED WITH STREET TREES AND IRRIGATED.

AND THE PARKING AND LOADING AREA ALSO IS SURROUNDED BY BY TREES.

AND THE STORAGE AREA FOR THE EXPLOSIVES WILL HAVE A HEDGE AROUND IT.

NOW FOR THE RECOMMENDATIONS.

THE RECOMMENDATIONS CAN GET KIND OF LENGTHY.

SO I'M GOING TO SUMMARIZE SOME OF THEM, IF THAT'S OKAY WITH THE CHAIR.

NUMBER ONE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, THE FIRST BEING THAT THE PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS APPROVAL, BUT WHEN THEY COME FOR BUILDING PERMITS AND OTHER PERMITS HAVE TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE SUBMITTED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH ARE IN THE BACKUP AND WHICH WE'VE SHOWED YOU HERE.

NUMBER TWO, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO MAKE SOME TECHNICAL REVISIONS TO THE EAST ELEVATION ON THE RENDERINGS TO LANDSCAPE PLANS, PARKING SPACE, DETAIL AND AND DATA TABLE.

THESE ARE ALL THE KINDS OF THINGS THAT THAT AREN'T SUBSTANTIVE AND AND THEY DON'T AFFECT THE WHAT THE BOARD'S CONSIDERING IT'S JUST LITTLE TECHNICAL FIXES THAT THEY NEED TO MAKE.

NUMBER THREE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING AS PART OF THE BUILDING SET SUBMITTAL SIGN DIMENSIONS AND

[00:35:06]

MATERIALS, THE SIGNS SHOWN ON THE RENDERING ARE ILLUSTRATIVE, AND THEY'RE NOT APPROVED AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN, AND THEY'RE NOT PROPOSED FOR APPROVAL AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN.

TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION.

THE BUILDING COLOR SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED OR SIMILAR.

IF IT DEPARTS FROM WHAT'S SHOWN OR INDICATED, THEN IT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL.

THE DETAILS OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION 369.

THOSE THAT WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE SITE SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL, WHICH INCLUDE LOW EMITTING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, WATER CONSERVATION AND REFLECTIVE ROOF FINISH NEED TO BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THAT BUILDING PERMIT SET.

SOME OF THOSE DETAILS TEND NOT TO BE KNOWN UNTIL FURTHER THEY'RE FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD WITH CONSTRUCTION LEVEL DRAWINGS.

NEXT, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.

THERE NEEDS TO BE AN EV PARKING SPACE, AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE, PARKING SPACE, SIGN DETAIL, THE EXACT HEIGHT OF THE WALL PACKS, WHICH ARE THE BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURES NEED TO BE DETERMINED ON THE BUILDING PERMIT PLANS AND ANY CHANGE TO THE SPECIFIED FIXTURES WOULD REQUIRE ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL, AND ANY BARBED WIRE MUST BE LIMITED TO THE TOP TWO FEET OF THE FENCE, NOT TO EXCEED EIGHT FEET WITH NO SPIRAL SPIRAL WIRE.

THEY NEED TO PROVIDE FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS.

THEY NEED TO CONDUCT A HYDRANT FLOW TEST AND TO PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE WATER SOURCE IF THE VILLAGE'S WATER SYSTEM DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT PRESSURE.

THEY NEED TO PROVIDE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT FOR SITE WORK.

THEY NEED TO CORRECT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE PLAN SET TO MATCH THE PROPERTY SURVEY, AND THAT CONCLUDES THE CONDITIONS AND THE STAFF PRESENTATION.

OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD TO STAFF? YES, GO AHEAD. OKAY.

WITH THAT, I GUESS THE FLOW TEST OR THE THE THE FIRE HYDRANT HAS NOT BEEN TESTED YET.

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THIS WILL INCUR ANY EXTRA CHARGES TO THE VILLAGE FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION OR EXPLOSION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. ANY OTHER INCREASE? BECAUSE WE PAY FOR THAT.

WILL THAT WILL WE SUFFER ANY INCREASED CHARGE IN THAT WAY FOR.

IF EVERYONE'S LOOKING AT ME, THE ANSWER WOULD BE NO.

THAT WOULD BE ON THE APPLICANT FOR THEY WOULD CONTACT US WITH THE FLOW TEST ON THE RECORD.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME. MY NAME IS DOUG CULLEN.

I'M THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR MARTIN COUNTY.

CAN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE, SIR? SURE. OKAY.

MY NAME IS DOUG CULLEN. I'M THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR MARTIN COUNTY, AND IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WITHIN INDIAN TOWN IN AN AGREEMENT WITH MARTIN COUNTY.

SO MY PRIMARY REASON FOR DOING THAT IS I NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S ADEQUATE ACCESS AND WATER FLOW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.

SO THE ANSWER TO THAT IS NO.

THE APPLICANT WOULD BE THE ONE THAT WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THE FLOW TEST.

NO, NO. I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING IS YOU HAVE AN INCREASED RISK.

YOU KNOW, LIKE WITH INSURANCE, YOU HAVE AN ACTUARY.

AND IF YOU HAVE AN INCREASED RISK WITH SOMETHING LIKE THIS, I MEAN, WE'VE NEVER HAD AN APPLICATION THAT NEEDED A BLAST EXHIBIT BEFORE.

SO SINCE WE PAY FOR THOSE SERVICES, I WANTED TO KNOW IF JUST HAVING A FACILITY LIKE THIS WITH THIS TYPE OF POTENTIAL WOULD CAUSE INCREASED COSTS TO THE VILLAGE.

I COULDN'T ANSWER THAT. MY RESPONSIBILITY IS THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.

RIGHT. SO WE WE DON'T KNOW.

I GUESS WE'D HAVE TO INQUIRE.

I WOULD THINK THE APPLICANT'S INSURANCE COMPANY WOULD BE THERE.

THE PRIMARY.

OKAY. FOR THAT, LET'S HEAR FROM OUR ATTORNEY.

YEAH. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

I CAN ADDRESS THAT QUESTION WITH REGARD TO WITH REGARD TO ANY INSURANCE RISK ONE WAY OR THE OTHER THAT WOULD BE ON THE APPLICANT, THE PROPERTY OWNER AND SO ON.

WITH REGARD TO THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE VILLAGE FOR FIRE SERVICES, AS YOU ALL AS YOU ALL MAY KNOW, WE ARE IN AN AGREEMENT WITH MARTIN COUNTY TO PROVIDE FIRE SERVICES WITHIN THE VILLAGE, AND THAT IS PURSUANT TO THE VILLAGE OPTING INTO THE COUNTY'S MST2 AND MSB, THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING DISTRICT AND MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT DISTRICT.

[00:40:05]

THOSE ARE ASSESSED BASED ON MATTERS THAT DO NOT HAVE TO DO WITH AN ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF A PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY.

SO IT NONE OF THAT.

NO QUALIFICATION WITH REGARD TO THAT WOULD VARY WHAT WE PAY PURSUANT TO THOSE ARRANGEMENTS AND AGREEMENTS.

THANK YOU. ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THAT? BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER.

YES, I DO HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION.

I GUESS IT'S FOR STAFF ON THE ZONING FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

AGAIN, I DON'T SEE HOW THERE ISN'T LIKE A LIST THAT COVERS EVERYTHING OF WHAT IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, BUT IT JUST DOESN'T SEEM TO ME LIKE THIS IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

SO ALTHEA JEFFERSON FOR THE RECORD, THE APPLICANT DID MAKE A REQUEST PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THEIR APPLICATION FOR A ZONING VERIFICATION FOR THE USES OF THIS PROPERTY.

STAFF TYPICALLY USES THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AS WELL AS THE ZONING AND THE PERMITTED USE TABLE.

LIKE YOU JUST MENTIONED, OUR PERMITTED USE TABLE DOES NOT SPECIFY THIS PARTICULAR USE.

YEAH. SO THE CODE PROVIDES THAT WE MAKE A DETERMINATION BASED ON THE ACTUAL LIST OF USES ON THE PERMITTED USE TABLE ON THE ACTUAL WHAT THE ACTUAL USES THAT ARE LISTED IN THE CODE ON THE PERMITTED USE TABLE.

SO STAFF LIKENED THIS PARTICULAR USE TO THE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING AND STORAGE USE.

AND IT WAS DETERMINED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT SIMILAR USE FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

I SEE. THANK YOU.

OKAY. REMEMBER WHAT? YOU'RE WELCOME. YES.

WHEN REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION AND UNDERSTANDING HOW LONG IT'S TAKING.

GRIND HARD TO GET THROUGH THIS PROCESS, WHICH HAS BEEN EXTREMELY LONG AND TEDIOUS, FROM MY UNDERSTANDING.

I WENT THROUGH AND AND LOOKED AT A FEW THINGS THAT THE STAFF HAS BEEN ASKING.

GRIND HARD TO SUPPLY.

MY FIRST QUESTION IS TO STAFF DID THE APPLICANT ASK TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INCENTIVES? DID THEY ASK TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT PROGRAM? NO, THEY DID NOT.

OKAY. SO THEY DIDN'T ASK TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT PROGRAM, BUT YET THEY'RE BEING HELD TO THAT STANDARD.

COULD YOU EXPLAIN WHY THAT'S NOT CORRECT? THERE ARE STANDARDS AND THEN THERE ARE INCENTIVES.

THEY'RE SEPARATE. ALL DEVELOPMENT IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AS WELL AS SEVERAL OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS HAS TO HAS TO COMPLY WITH, NOT THE INCENTIVES.

THOSE ARE SEPARATE. WELL, I'M CONFUSED ABOUT THAT BECAUSE DURING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESS, ALL THE GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WERE TO BE INCENTIVIZED AND NOT TO BE REQUIRED AS PART OF A DEVELOPMENT STANDARD.

AND I SEE THAT THEY'VE BEEN ASKED TO, FOR EXAMPLE, THE REFLECTIVITY OF THE ROOFING MEMBRANE THAT IS A GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE STANDARD. SO MY QUESTION IS, FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU GO TO THE GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, IT SAYS GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES ARE AVAILABLE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT, MEANING NOT REQUIRE IT'S NOT A MANDATORY REQUIREMENT.

THEN YOU GO FURTHER DOWN SECTION J.

IT SAYS, TURNING TO THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS.

THE APPLICANT SHALL DO THE FOLLOWING.

IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES, THE APPLICANT MUST SUCCESSFULLY REGISTER THE PROJECT WITH THE GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE.

AND ON AND ON AND ON. I DON'T WANT TO BORE YOU WITH ALL THIS STUFF, BUT I'M CONFUSED AS TO WHY WE ARE HOLDING APPLICANTS TO THAT STANDARD WHEN LET ME REFER TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

UNDER POLICY.

WL 2.1.3 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH INCENTIVES WHICH MAY INCLUDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, FAST TRACKING, PERMIT FEE REBATES, IMPACT FEE DEFERRALS, ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES AND VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN SHALL ENCOURAGE LEADERSHIP IN THE GREEN ENERGY, GREEN AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN, ALSO KNOWN AS LEED.

I DON'T SEE IN THE LEADERS WHERE SOME OF THESE THINGS APPLY AND SOME OF THEM DON'T.

THEY. THEY'RE ASKED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEAD PROGRAM OR THEY DON'T.

SO I'M CONFUSED ABOUT THIS, LOOKING AT I'M GOING TO GO ON.

WE'LL WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT SUBJECT.

AND LOOKING AT THE COMMENTS THAT HAVE COME BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN STAFF AND THE APPLICANT, I NOTICED THAT THERE WERE MANY THINGS, IN MY OPINION, THAT ARE NOT

[00:45:07]

TYPICALLY EVER SEEN IN A SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS.

YOU KNOW. FOR EXAMPLE, THE HEIGHT OF LIGHT FIXTURES.

THAT'S SOMETHING THAT COMES INTO THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.

YOU KNOW, YOU'VE GOT I FIND IT INTERESTING.

WE'RE ASKING FOR AN APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS.

BUT IF YOU GO TO NUMBER TWO, WHATEVER YOUR GRAPHIC ONLINE IS DIFFERENT THAN WE HAVE PRINTED HERE.

IT'S SAYS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER.

WELL, IF WE APPROVE SOMETHING, YOU DON'T GET A DEVELOPMENT ORDER.

THEY HAVEN'T BEEN APPROVED.

THEY'VE STILL GOT TO GO THROUGH AN ADDITIONAL PROCESS THAT STAFF IS GOING TO GO DOWN AND, YOU KNOW, REVISED ELEVATIONS TO SHOW A CANOPY OVER THE EAST ELEVATION DOORWAY. GUYS, THIS IS A SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS.

A SITE PLAN TYPICALLY TAKES AND SAYS, ARE YOU ALLOWED TO DO WHAT THEY WANT TO DO ON THIS PROPERTY? CAN WE FIT THE REQUIRED UTILITIES PARKING, SO ON AND SO FORTH? YOU CREATE A FOOTPRINT.

THAT FOOTPRINT MAY CHANGE THROUGH THE TO THE PROCESS WHERE YOU WORK WITH ALL THE DIFFERENT DISCIPLINES AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

SO THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING USUALLY DOESN'T TAKE PLACE UNTIL ACTUALLY THE SITE PLAN HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BECAUSE THE ARCHITECTS, THE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS DON'T REALLY KNOW UNTIL YOU GET DOWN TO THE NITTY GRITTY, UNTIL IT'S PROVED WHAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO DESIGN AND BUILD.

AND A LOT OF THESE DETAILS HAVE BEEN ASKED FOR ON HERE ARE SOMETHING THAT IS DONE THROUGH THE DESIGN PROCESS OF THE ACTUAL BUILDING ITSELF.

AND A LOT OF THESE THINGS TAKE PLACE DURING A PERMIT PROCESS FOR BUILDING THE BUILDING, NOT THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS.

SO WHEN I SEE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, REVISED ELEVATIONS FOR A CANOPY, PROVIDE PLANNING AND IRRIGATION PLANS SIGNED AND SEALED ON OR AFTER THE DATE OF DRAWING.

GUYS, THESE THINGS CAN BE DONE.

THESE GUYS CAN START THEIR SITE WORK, START TURNING DIRT, START MOVING FORWARD WITHOUT ALL THESE THINGS.

LET ME CONTINUE. I'M SORRY ABOUT THAT.

PLACE A NOTE ON THE PLAN.

THAT INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CO.

REMOVE TREE MITIGATION NOTE IN PLANNING PLAN REVISE ELEVATION.

SO IN ROOFTOP X.

OKAY, HERE WE GO. JUST TO GIVE YOU A BIT OF MY BACKGROUND, I'M A GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

I WAS ALSO IN THE ARCHITECTURAL BUSINESS.

ONCE AGAIN, WHEN YOU TAKE A FACILITY LIKE THESE GUYS HAVE AND I WENT AND VISITED THEIR FACILITY IN STUART TO SEE WHAT IS ENTAILED.

THERE IS A TON OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ISSUES THAT WILL GO THROUGH A DESIGN PROCESS AND THE ENGINEERS WILL DECIDE WHERE THE EQUIPMENT NEEDS TO GO OR THE APPROPRIATE PLACE IS. JUST BECAUSE WE WANT A PRETTY PICTURE SOMETIMES DOESN'T WORK IN REALITY.

SO WITH THAT SAID, WANTING TO SEE AN ELEVATION SHOWING THE ROOFTOP X OK AT WHAT ANGLE OF ATTACK ARE WE LOOKING AT A LINE DRAWING? ARE WE LOOKING AT IT FROM SEVEN FEET FROM THE GROUND UP IN A BUILDING IS 26 FEET HIGH.

AND WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE GOING TO SEE THE AC, THIS IS TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE FOR A SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO GO THROUGH THIS SORT OF EXERCISE.

SO WITH THAT SAID.

IF I GET A CHANCE TO MAKE A MOTION, IT'S GOING TO BE APPROVED THE SITE PLAN AND ALL INDIRECT STAFF TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT THROUGH ALL THESE OTHER ISSUES PRIOR TO A BUILDING PERMIT.

BUT LET THEM GO AHEAD AND PROCEED WITH THE SITE WORK AND GET MOVING ON THIS PROJECT.

BECAUSE WHAT I SEE, WHAT I SEE HERE TROUBLES ME THAT THERE SEEMS TO BE MASS CONFUSION ABOUT WHAT PART OF THE CODE WE'RE APPLYING.

IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE WE MIGHT HAVE A CONFLICT WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE LVRS AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

SO THAT'S THAT'S MY $0.02.

THANK YOU. MEMBER WATSON.

MEMBER ON SAGER.

YES. THANK YOU.

I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF THERE IS ANY IF PART OF THE SITE PLANNING HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH MAKING SURE THERE'S A DAMAGE MITIGATION PLAN OR RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PLACE, ACCESS CONTROL TO THE EXPLOSIVES AND A CONTAINMENT AND SECURITY PLAN.

IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE REQUIRE AS PART OF THE SITE APPROVAL? NO, MA'AM. THAT IS THAT IS NOT THE FIRE ACCESS IS THAT'S WHAT CHIEF KILLEEN REVIEWS THE PLAN FOR.

THERE'S THE LIKE I SAID, THE FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS AS FAR AS THE LOCATION OF THE EXPLOSIVES, THE THE TYPE OF CONTAINMENT AND THAT TYPE OF THING.

BUT AS FAR AS.

AND THEY ALSO HAVE SOME SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AS WELL.

BUT THE VILLAGE DOES NOT IMPOSE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY, THANK YOU.

MEMBER ON SAGER.

MEMBER PRESSLER, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.

THIS IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES. OKAY.

MADAM CHAIR? YES, I'D ACTUALLY YOU.

THIS HAS ALL BEEN AT THE POINT IN THE PROCESS WHERE DIRECTING QUESTIONS TO STAFF THE NEXT THE NEXT STEP IN THE PROCESS IS THE APPLICANT BEING ABLE TO SPEAK TO YOU ALL, PRESENT ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT THE APPLICANT MAY HAVE, AND THEN QUESTIONS TO THE APPLICANT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE.

[00:50:06]

SO WE'LL HAVE A SECOND CHANCE TO QUESTION THE APPLICANT.

YOU WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ASK QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. YES. OKAY.

SO WE CAN CALL FOR THE APPLICANT NOW TO COME.

I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT, YES.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

CAN LOWER THAT A LITTLE BIT.

GOOD EVENING. I AM REBECCA HALL.

I AM AN ACP PLANNER WITH MV ENGINEERING, AND I AM HERE TONIGHT ON BEHALF OF GRIND HEART AMMUNITION AS WELL AS GRIND HARD REALITY.

WE ARE PROPOSING A 26,000 SQUARE FOOT FACILITY FOR MANUFACTURING WITH RELATED STORAGE.

THE ENTIRE SITE ITSELF IS 19 ACRES AND IT SITS BACK 255 FEET FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE.

AND OUR SITE PLAN SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE OTHER SETBACKS.

THIS FACILITY EXCEEDS ALL LANDSCAPING CODES, AS WELL AS THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS.

AND I REALLY WANT TO UNDERSCORE THAT THIS PROJECT BRINGS JOBS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO THIS COMMUNITY WITH A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF ECONOMIC INVESTMENT IN THE LAND AS WELL AS THE BUILDING.

I'D JUST LIKE TO QUICKLY INTRODUCE THE GRINDER TEAM.

TO MY RIGHT HERE IS BARRY SKOLNICK WITH GRIND HARD REALTY, BRANDON ROTH, WHO REPRESENTS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.

AND THEN I HAVE AUSTIN WARES.

THERE HE IS, AUSTIN WEISS.

HE IS THE OPERATOR AND HE'S A VERY SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSMAN IN HIS OWN RIGHT WITH THE AMMUNITION MANUFACTURING.

SO THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE HERE IN TONIGHT OF SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT.

AND IF YOU COULD JUST WAVE, MAYBE.

THANK YOU. I AM HAPPY TO ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS, PROVIDE YOU SOME RESPONSES, ANYTHING YOU MIGHT HAVE REGARDING THE ENGINEERING, THE BUILDING. AND I WOULD ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT TONIGHT.

OKAY. BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER YES, I GUESS MY QUESTION IS FOR MR. WEISS. I'D LIKE TO PASS OUT A.

TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPER ARTICLE FROM MARCH 18TH, 2021, WHEN YOU WERE QUOTED IN THE PAPER QUITE A WHILE AGO.

I NEED TO PASS OUT COPIES TO FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS, AND I HAVE A COPY.

I HAVE A COPY FOR YOU ALSO, JUST TO REFRESH YOUR MEMORY.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

DO YOU NEED ONE? NO, MA'AM.

AT THIS TIME. I GUESS THERE WAS A PART OF YOUR COMPANY, WHICH IS FIVE YEARS OLD, ABOUT THAT WAS GOING INTO THE WILLOUGHBY AREA.

WILL IT BE BUSINESS PARK? AND THERE WAS PEOPLE IN WILLOUGHBY, RESIDENTS WHO WERE CONCERNED, AND PERHAPS YOU WERE SEEKING TO HELP THEM FEEL A LITTLE BETTER ABOUT THE MANUFACTURING.

AND YOU WERE SAYING THAT THE COPPER PORTION.

YES, MA'AM. WAS GOING TO BE THERE IN WILLOUGHBY.

AND THIS IS A QUOTE WHICH STOOD OUT TO ME.

THE MORE DANGEROUS PARTS WOULD BE MANUFACTURED IN INDIAN TOWN.

AND YOU WENT ON TO SAY, RATHER THAN MIXING THE POWDER FOR THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS, GRIND HARD AMMO BUYS IT FROM A FLORIDA COMPANY THAT MAKES MILITARY SUPPLIES.

THE INDIAN TOWN PLANT WOULD BE, QUOTE, WHERE THE ENERGETICS ARE MANUFACTURED FOR THE CASE.

AND THAT'S WHAT PROPELS THE BULLET.

THAT'S CORRECT. THE SMALL PRIMER THAT'S IN THE BOTTOM OF THE WELL, I MEAN, THIS DOESN'T MAKE ME FEEL GOOD AT ALL.

IT MAKES ME FEEL LIKE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE REJECTED BY THE RESIDENTS OF WILLOUGHBY WILL BE FINE FOR THE RESIDENTS OF INDIAN TOWN.

AND THAT WAS DUE TO THE BLAST ARC.

MAN WHAT? THAT WAS DUE TO THE BLAST ARC THAT WE HAD PUT OUT THERE? YES. WHICH EXCEEDS THE 20 ACRES.

IT EXCEEDS THE PROPERTY.

WELL, I MEAN, THE RED.

THE BLACK ONE IS NOT THE RED ONE.

JOSEPH LEE GARDENS IS 1.2 MILES FROM THIS LOCATION.

APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE.

YES. AND THE RED ARC IS WHAT THE ATF, THE ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS, THAT'S THE REQUIREMENT INSIDE OF A TYPE TWO MAGAZINE.

YES. MY HUSBAND IS RETIRED, ATF.

[00:55:03]

YES. SO BUT ANYWAY, YOUR STATEMENTS TO THE NEWSPAPER ARE THOSE QUOTES, CORRECT? YES, THEY ARE.

THE HIGHER EXPLOSIVE NATURE STORED OUT HERE IN THE ON PROPERTY.

I MEAN, THIS IS A LOW INCOME AREA.

IT'S ALSO A MINORITY DOMINANT AREA.

AND IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THINGS THAT ARE REJECTED FROM OTHER HIGHER INCOME AREAS ARE PUT OUT HERE.

UNDERSTOOD. WE'VE HAD A LONG HISTORY OF THIS KIND OF THING WHERE, YOU KNOW, ANYTHING THAT'S POLLUTING OR DANGEROUS SEEMS TO BE PUSHED OUT TO INDIAN TOWN.

YES, MA'AM. AND THAT WAS NOT AT ALL THE CASE.

WHAT HAPPENED WAS IN THE CITY OF STUART, THE THE ACTUAL BUILDING LINES WOULD NOT HAVE WORKED FOR WHAT WE NEEDED IT TO DO.

SO WE DECIDED TO INVEST OUT IN INDIAN TOWN FOR THE PROPERTY SIZE.

EVERYTHING'S CONTAINED.

EVERYTHING HAS TO BE REGULATED BY THE ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS. IT'S IT'S A VERY SERIOUS BUSINESS.

AND FOR US, IT'S SAFETY IS PARAMOUNT.

YOU KNOW, WE HAVE OUR OUR EMPLOYEES, OUR FAMILY.

WE KNOW EVERY SINGLE PERSON ON STAFF.

EVERYBODY MATTERS. WE'RE NOT PUSHING SOMETHING OUT FROM STUART TO COME OUT HERE BECAUSE IT'S LOW INCOME.

WE'RE COMING OUT HERE TO CREATE JOBS.

AND THE BIGGEST THING FOR US IS WE NEEDED THE PROPERTY, WE NEEDED THE SIZE.

WE COULD NOT WE COULD NOT FIND THAT IN THE CITY OF STUART.

I MEAN, IT'S WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE VILLAGE.

I DON'T SEE I MEAN, DID YOU LOOK AT PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARY OF A VILLAGE LIKE OUR TOWN? WELL, WE LOOKED FOR WHAT WE LOOKED FOR WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS LIGHT.

INDUSTRIAL IS WHAT WE WERE REQUIRED BY.

AND WE SPOKE TO THE ATF, WE SPOKE TO DIFFERENT PARTIES.

AND THIS IS WHAT WE FOUND THAT WORKED PERFECTLY.

ANYTHING LIKE A STATIC CHARGE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT COULD SET THIS OFF.

IS THAT RIGHT? NO, THAT'S INCORRECT.

SO WHAT? SO BASICALLY, ALL OF THE ALL THE MATERIAL IS INERT.

AND SO IT'S MIXED IN A VERY SMALL BATCH, THAT SMALL BATCH.

AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE ACTUAL BUILD OUT AND REBECCA GET TO GO INTO DETAILS ON THIS IS ALL WITHIN A VERY BIG CONCRETE BLAST WALL.

EVERYTHING IS DIRECTED TO GO UP, NOT OUT.

THAT'S BASICALLY HOW IT'S DESIGNED.

IT'S ON PURPOSE THAT WAY.

NOBODY NOTHING ON THIS WAY OR ANY LEFT OR RIGHT OR ANY LATERAL WOULD HAPPEN.

SO FOR US, WE WERE REQUIRED BY THE ATF TO DO THIS, AND THAT'S HOW THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE BUILT.

WELL, I SEE THAT YOUR STORAGE IS 144 FEET FROM YOUR BUILDING.

YES. THAT'S VERY INHABITED BUILDING DISTANCE.

SO, I MEAN, SOMETHING YOU ANTICIPATE SOMETHING COULD HAPPEN THERE? NO, IT'S BASICALLY IT'S BASICALLY THE REQUIREMENTS FROM THE ATF.

WE HAVE WE'VE MANUFACTURED AMMUNITION AND HAVE NEVER HAD ISSUES, KNOCK ON WOOD.

AND I DON'T PLAN ON EVER HAVING ISSUES BECAUSE WE'RE OVERLY SAFE.

WELL, WE THERE'S NO CORNERS CUT.

EVERYTHING IS BUILT ABOVE AND BEYOND.

IT'S IT'S A VERY IT'S A VERY SERIOUS THING BECAUSE, AGAIN, MY WIFE, MY FAMILY, EVERYBODY, I KNOW THEIR WORKS AND IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THING.

SAFETY IS THE FIRST PART OF OUR BUSINESS.

WELL, YOU'VE ONLY BEEN IN BUSINESS FOR FIVE YEARS.

IT'S NOT A LONG TIME.

AND I JUST YOU KNOW, YOUR STATEMENTS TO THE NEWSPAPER SEEKING TO REASSURE WILLOUGHBY, I FOUND THAT VERY DISTURBING. I UNDERSTAND.

AND THAT'S ULTIMATELY THAT'S ULTIMATELY WHY WE DECIDED TO MANUFACTURE ON A LARGER PIECE OF PROPERTY.

THANK YOU. YES, MA'AM.

OKAY. I THINK.

REMEMBER WATSON? YEAH. MY QUESTION FOR THE ADVOCATE, WHEN I STATED EARLIER THAT I WOULD SUPPORT A MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT ANY.

EXCUSE ME, WITHOUT NUMBER TWO, WHICH WAS, YOU KNOW, SOME REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER.

DO YOU SEE ANY PROBLEM LOOKING AT NUMBER TWO WITH BEING ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH YOUR SITE WORK AND GETTING THE PROJECT UNDERWAY? ANY OF THESE REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY HAVE THAT YOU HAVE A PROBLEM MEETING BEFORE PERMIT OF THE ACTUAL BUILDING? NO. OKAY.

I JUST WANTED ONE OF THE BOARD TO HEAR THAT THAT BECAUSE I DON'T SEE ANYTHING HERE THAT WOULD STAND IN THE WAY OF ALLOWING YOU ALL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MEMBER WATSON.

MA'AM IS A CHAIR OF.

IF YOU'D LIKE TO SIT DOWN.

YOU'RE GOOD. OKAY.

THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.

MEMBER ON SAGER.

THANK YOU. HOW MANY JOBS WILL YOU BE PROVIDING? ROUGHLY 30 SHIFTS, MA'AM.

AND YOU WILL BE BECAUSE YOU ARE IN THE VILLAGE.

THANK GOODNESS YOU'LL BE A HELP TO OUR TAX BASE.

THAT'S CORRECT. YES, MA'AM.

AND YOU HAVE RISK MANAGEMENT PLANS? OH, ABSOLUTELY. ABSOLUTELY.

AND WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE DOING OUT HERE ARE THE PRIMERS, WHICH ARE TEENSY LITTLE TINY LITTLE THINGS.

YES, MA'AM. IT'S £44 A DAY.

THAT'S IT. WHAT TYPE OF SAFETY MECHANISMS DO YOU HAVE ON THE LOCKING MAGAZINE? SO REQUIRED BY ATF REQUIRES TWO LOCKS.

THOSE LOCKS ARE BASICALLY PICKED PROOF, DRILL PROOF.

THEY'RE EXTREMELY HIGH END LOCKS THAT'S REQUIRED BY THE ATF IS ALSO WE HAVE THE FULL PROPERTY TO BE FENCED IN AND SECURED SECURITY CAMERAS THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTIES COMPLETELY

[01:00:06]

LIT, 24 HOUR SECURITY CAMERAS, 24 HOUR SECURITY ONSITE.

SO LIKE I SAID, SECURITY TO ME IS PARAMOUNT.

WHAT KIND OF TRAINING DO YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH OR RENEWAL TRAINING OR ANY KIND OF EDUCATION? SO IT'S ANNUAL TRAINING? YES, MA'AM. SO YOU ARE CERTIFIED IN MANUFACTURING A FIVE? YES, MA'AM. THAT'S CORRECT.

YOU ARE RECERTIFIED ANNUALLY.

ANNUALLY? YES, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT.

SO AND THE ATF DOES ATF DOES THAT WALK FOR CHOOSING INDIAN? THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN.

WE NEED TAXPAYERS HERE AND WE NEED BUSINESS HERE.

I WANT TO POINT OUT I WANT TO POINT OUT SOMETHING HERE THAT SHE DIDN'T POINT OUT THAT THAT I FIND TO STAND OUT.

THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THIS TO ME.

I HAD NOT SEEN THIS.

IT SAYS THAT YOU ARE YOU LOCK THE PLACE DOWN.

NOBODY'S ALLOWED ON THE PROPERTY AT ALL.

FIRE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES.

EMPLOYEES ARE SCREENED.

YES, MA'AM. THAT IS. EMPLOYEES ARE TRAINED.

YES, MA'AM. EMPLOYEES ARE CONSTANTLY UPDATED ON SAFETY PROCEDURES.

YES, MA'AM. OK, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING TO INDIAN TOWN.

YES, MA'AM. OKAY.

THANK YOU. HOLD ON ONE SECOND.

MEMBER WATSON.

YEAH. JUST FOR THE EDIFICATION OF THE BOARD.

AND ONCE AGAIN, I VISITED THEIR FACILITY IN STUART, AND I MUST SAY THEY TOOK THE OLD YMCA BUILDING AND THE WORKMANSHIP AND THE QUALITY AND THE SECURITY THERE IS IMPECCABLE. I MEAN, IMPECCABLE.

I WAS IMPRESSED WITH EVERY THING THAT I SAW THERE.

SO IF THAT'S A REFLECTION OF WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO OUT HERE, AND I BELIEVE THAT IT IS, I'M ALL IN.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT, SIR. I GOT I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.

OKAY. GO AHEAD. HELLO, SIR.

JUST TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT YOUR FACILITY IN IN STUART, JUST FOR I'VE NEVER BEEN TO IT OR.

YEAH. SO OUR FACILITY IN STUART IS ASSEMBLY MANUFACTURING OF THE CASES AND OF THE CUPS.

SO WE TAKE A RAW COPPER STRIP IN AND IT USES A HYDRAULIC PRESS AND IT PRESSES DOWN AND CREATES AND DRAWS OVER A DEEP PROCESS OVER 16 STATIONS.

IT CREATES THE CASE ITSELF.

AND THEN ON THE BULLET SIDE, WE MANUFACTURE, WE BASICALLY TAKE THE INSERT OF THE BULLET, IT GOES THROUGH A HEADER AND THAT HEADER CREATES AN INSIDE SHELL AND THEN IT'S JACKETED BY BRASS. ONCE THAT'S DONE, IT'S ALL WASHED.

ALL THAT WASHED IS CONTAINED ON SITE.

AGAIN, EVERYTHING IS CONTAINED ON SITE AND NOTHING IS LEAKED OUT.

NOTHING GOES BACK TO THE CITY.

ALL OF THAT IS DONE THROUGH AN EVAP UNIT AND THEN THAT IS PUMPED OUT BY A SPECIALIST.

THAT'S ALL CERTIFIED IN THAT.

AND WE'LL WE'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO PROVIDE ALL THAT.

AS FOR YOU. AND THEN THEY'RE ASSEMBLED, BASICALLY RUN THROUGH A ROTARY PRESS AND ASSEMBLED, AND THEN FROM THERE THEY'RE PACKAGED AND SHIPPED OUT FROM THERE.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. WISE, RIGHT? YES, MA'AM.

OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.

YOU SAID THERE'S 30 PEOPLE A SHIFT.

HOW MANY SHIFTS WILL YOU HAVE? IT WILL BE AT FULL CAPACITY.

THREE SHIFTS. THREE SHIFTS? WHAT TYPE OF BACKGROUND WOULD YOU DO YOUR EMPLOYEES FACE? YOU HAVE TO DO FULL FEDERAL BACKGROUND DUTY SINCE IT'S AN ATF AND IT'S A SECURE SITE.

SO IN THE EVENT THAT YOU APPROVE WITH THOSE, WHAT HOW WOULD YOU ADVERTISE HERE FOR MEMBERS OF INDIAN TOWN? WELL, I WOULD GET WITH THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND GET WITH THEM AND DECIDE HOW WILL THE BEST WAY TO LOOK FOR LOCAL HELP? LOCAL HELP IS OBVIOUSLY THAT'S WHERE WE WANT.

OKAY. AND THEN THEY WOULD BE FULLY TRAINED WELL.

RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ABSOLUTELY. OK.

ARE THERE ANY ANY MORE QUESTIONS? BOARD MEMBERS.

OKAY. WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? OKAY. WE HAVE CAROL MCALLISTER.

HELLO, MY NAME IS CAROL MCALLISTER.

THE THING I'M CONCERNED ABOUT IS THIS FACILITY BEING THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO LIVE WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THIS.

WHAT EFFECT IS IT GOING TO HAVE ON THEM? PLUS, MY SISTER AND I ON ON PROPERTY ON SOUTH OF THE ROAD, ACROSS THE ROAD, WHICH WE HAVE CATTLE ON.

IS THERE ANY RUNOFF? WHAT ABOUT STORMWATER DRAINAGE? IS ALL THAT TAKEN CARE OF AND ALL THIS SITE APPROVAL? MR. WISE. YES, MA'AM.

I WOULD HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO EFFECT ON ANY OF YOU BECAUSE I GREW UP ON THAT PROPERTY.

SO I KNOW HOW THE WATER FLOWS THERE.

WE OWN JUST JUST ACROSS THE ROAD FROM YOU.

YES, MA'AM. SO I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT RUNOFF INTO THAT POND THAT GOES DOWN INTO THE PASTURE AND NOT EVEN INTO THE GROUND.

THANK YOU. I REBUILT MY BED, SET IT DOWN WHEN THE LAND WAS BLOWN OFF.

OH, YOU'RE GOING TO BUY HER A NEW FENCE.

OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS IN THE PUBLIC COMMENTS? I REBUILT IT AND PAID FOR IT.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

DID YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING, MA'AM? THAT YOU WANT TO COME TO THE PODIUM?

[01:05:01]

YOU OKAY? DID Y'ALL HEAR HER COMMENTS? Y'ALL NEED TO BUY HER FENCE, REIMBURSE HER.

OKAY. AND THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT.

THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT.

OKAY. WE ASK MEMBER WATSON TO PLEASE RESTATE.

I THINK WE HAD A MOTION.

DO YOU WANT TO RESTATE YOUR MOTION? YES. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE THAT WE APPROVE THE WE APPROVE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER IS IS ISSUED AND THAT WE DIRECT STAFF TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT PRIOR TO BUILDING THE ACTUAL BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE ACTUAL STRUCTURE ITSELF TO WORK THROUGH THESE OTHER ISSUES, BECAUSE THIS APPLICANT HAS BEEN HELD UP FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW. I KNOW THEY HAVE EQUIPMENT SITTING IN CONTAINERS THAT NEED TO BE PUT IN PLACE AND START PRODUCING AMMUNITION.

MEMBER WATSON ARE YOU GOING TO MAKE A MOTION? EXCUSE ME. YES, YES.

I'M SORRY. I THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

YES, I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT FOR STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL, WITH WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER, THAT WE GO AHEAD AND ISSUE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. I SECOND THAT.

THANK YOU. ALL IN FAVOR? I KNOW I AIN'T COMPLETELY OPPOSED IT.

OKAY. SO YOU RECALL.

CHAIR. PALMER NO VICE CHAIR.

SMILEY NO.

BOARD MEMBER. PRESSLER NO BOARD MEMBER ON.

SONGER YES.

BOARD MEMBER HAYEK.

YES. BOARD MEMBER.

WATSON. YES.

BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS. NO. OH, SO WHAT? ALL RIGHT, SO WE'RE GOING TO.

WE'RE MOVING ON.

MATT. YES. YEAH.

MADAM CHAIR, ANOTHER MOTION WOULD BE IN ORDER AT THIS TIME TO CONSIDER SOMETHING ELSE.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

OK WE WANT DOES.

YEAH. DOES ANY MEMBER OF THE OF THE BOARD HAVE ANOTHER MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE AS IS SINCE WE'VE BEEN DENIED THE PREVIOUS MOTION.

I'LL SECOND. OKAY.

ROLL CALL. BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER.

NO. BOARD MEMBER SAYING YES.

BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. NO BOARD MEMBER.

I'M SORRY. VICE CHAIR MILEY.

NO. CHAIR PALMER? NO. THEY.

MAYBE WE SHOULD INFOSEC.

THE MOTION FAILED.

WILL YOU TAKE MY VOTE? WATSON? YES.

YOU WERE THE SECOND BOARD MEMBER.

I WAS THE SECOND. YOU AUTOMATICALLY.

OKAY. I GOT YOU. OKAY.

MADAM CHAIR. SO THIS IS JUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC AND FOR THE BOARD.

THIS IS THIS IS ULTIMATELY A RECOMMENDATION ONE WAY OR THE OTHER TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL.

HOWEVER, THIS IS A QUASI JUDICIAL MATTER.

SO THE APPLICANT IS ENTITLED TO A DECISION, NOT NECESSARILY A DECISION THEY WANT, BUT A DECISION.

SO I WOULD RECOMMEND MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE THAT ANYONE WHO'S VOTED NO ON THESE MATTERS, YOU MIGHT HAVE SOME DISCUSSION DIRECTED TO WHAT THE CONCERNS WERE AND IF ULTIMATELY YOU WERE, YOU VOTED NO AND YOU ARE ULTIMATELY AGAINST THIS PROJECT THAT YOU WOULD STATE ON THE RECORD.

WE TALKED ABOUT COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, THE EVIDENCE THAT YOU HAVE THAT THAT WOULD SUPPORT YOUR DETERMINATION, THAT YOU DON'T BELIEVE THIS PROJECT SHOULD BE APPROVED. ALL RIGHT.

YOU NEED TO REFERENCE WHAT IT IS ABOUT THIS PROJECT, WHAT EVIDENCE YOU HAVE HEARD THAT THAT LEADS YOU TO BELIEVE IT SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED. DISCUSS THAT AND THEN A MOTION DIRECTED IN THAT DIRECTION IF THAT'S WHERE YOU WANT TO GO.

ALTERNATIVELY, IF ANY OF YOU HAVE VOTED NO BECAUSE YOU HAVE SOME CONCERN ABOUT ONE THING OR ANOTHER, BUT WITH A CHANGE, YOU WOULD VOTE YES, I WOULD.

[01:10:01]

I WOULD RECOMMEND YOU DISCUSS THAT AS WELL.

AND IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO ASK.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

I'LL START WITH VICE.

VICE MEILING.

AFTER REVIEWING THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED PRIOR TO OUR MEETING, I WAS ABLE TO LEARN SEVERAL DETAILS AND FACTS ABOUT THE MANUFACTURING OF THE AMMUNITION AND THE BENEFITS THAT IT COULD POSSIBLY HAVE IF THEY WERE TO COME TO TOWN.

HOWEVER, I PUT THE SAFETY OF THE MEMBER THE COMMUNITY FIRST, AND I DON'T FEEL LIKE THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THIS COMMUNITY. I AM A LIFELONG RESIDENT OF INDIAN TOWN.

I HAVE GRANDPARENTS WHO WERE HERE SINCE.

THEY WERE CHILDREN.

AND I JUST IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT MY GRANDPARENTS ARE IN SUPPORT OF, AND NEITHER AM I.

THANK YOU. CHAIR.

VICE-CHAIR BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER.

ONE OF MY CONCERNS IS ZONING FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

I DON'T SEE THAT SOMETHING THAT HAS A BLAST EXHIBIT IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

THE APPLICANT HIMSELF IS QUOTED AS CALLING THIS DANGEROUS.

THAT IS THE WORD WAS USED.

SO I YOU KNOW, I DON'T SEE HOW THIS FITS AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

THANK YOU. LET ME SAY THIS TO THE AUDIENCE.

HOUSEKEEPING. WE'RE GOING TO RESPECT EVERYBODY'S OPINION.

EVERYBODY HAVE THE RIGHT TO THEIR OPINION.

YOU PLEASE REFRAIN FROM MAKING NEGATIVE COMMENTS TO THE BOARD.

TO OUR BOARD.

WE ASKED TO GIVE OUR OPINION.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO.

SO PLEASE, LET'S RESPECT ONE ANOTHER.

AND IF THAT'S GOING TO BE A PROBLEM, I ASK YOU TO LEAVE.

THANK YOU. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS MY CONCERN IS THAT IT'S BEING CLOSE TO PROPERTY OWNERS.

AND MY SECOND CONCERN IS IT'S TOO CLOSE TO JO LEE DWELLINGS.

STEP. YEAH. POP SECTION ON YOUR RIGHT HAND SIDE OF WEST PALM ROAD.

AS YOU HEADED WEST.

OKAY. I VOTED NO.

AND I CONCUR WITH WHAT ALL THE OTHERS THAT VOTED NO, I THINK IS SOME FOR OUR COMMUNITY.

I JUST REALLY DON'T BELIEVE THAT THIS THIS IS THE COMMUNITY FOR IT.

THAT'S MY OPINION.

OK BOARD MEMBER ON CENTURY.

THANK YOU. I UNDERSTAND HOW EACH OF YOU THAT HAS VOTED NO FEELS.

I UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERNS PERSONALLY AND FOR THE LENGTH OF TIME YOU'VE LIVED HERE OR WHATEVER.

HOWEVER, WE WERE NOT CALLED UPON TO JUDGE THIS.

APPLICATION ON OUR FEELINGS.

THERE IS NO REASON.

THIS APPLICANT SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED.

NO FACTUAL REASON.

THESE EACH OF YOU HAS STATED YOUR FEELINGS.

THAT IS ABSOLUTELY NOT WHAT OUR ATTORNEY TOLD US WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING.

NONE OF YOU HAS GIVEN A FACTUAL PIECE OF EVIDENCE THAT CAUSES US TO SAY, OH, WAIT A MINUTE, WE DIDN'T KNOW THAT.

NOW. HE HAS THE MOST VALID OF OBJECTIONS IN THAT HE FEELS THAT IT'S TOO CLOSE TO THE APARTMENT BUILDINGS.

HOWEVER, WE HAVE A FIRE DEPARTMENT.

ATF AND OTHER.

PEOPLE WHO ARE CERTIFIED.

TO CONSIDER THE SAFETY OF THIS TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT.

AND THOSE PEOPLE ARE SAYING AND HAVE GIVEN US DRAWINGS SHOWING BECAUSE ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT I HAD ON HERE BEFORE THEY EVEN DID THE PRESENTATION WAS. WHAT'S THE MAGNITUDE OF THE BLAST ZONE? THAT QUESTION WAS FACTUALLY ANSWERED FOR ME.

HAD IT BEEN OUTSIDE OF THE CONTAINMENT AREA OF THEIR BUILDING, I WOULD HAVE BEEN VOTING NO ALONG WITH YOU.

HOWEVER. NONE OF THE EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT THIS IS A DANGER TO OUR COMMUNITY IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER.

IT COULD BE A SUBSTANTIAL BOOST TO OUR COMMUNITY WITH TAX REVENUE AND WITH JOBS WHICH WE DESPERATELY NEED.

[01:15:06]

I'M SO SORRY THAT PEOPLE'S FAMILIES AREN'T GOING TO LIKE THAT.

INDIAN TOWN IS CHANGING, BUT IF WE DO NOT CHANGE, THE VILLAGE WILL NOT SURVIVE.

AND WE NEED JOBS, WE NEED BUSINESSES, WE NEED ORGANIZATIONS.

AND AS FAR AS I CAN TELL, THIS GENTLEMAN HERE HAS A RIGHT AS AN AMERICAN TO OPEN A BUSINESS AND TO RUN A BUSINESS.

AND YOUR FEELINGS DO NOT MATTER.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

REMEMBER ON SAGER.

REMEMBER WATSON? WELL, I'D LIKE TO CARRY ON WITH MS..

ONSAGER SAID WE'RE NOT HERE TO.

TO WORRY ABOUT OUR FEELINGS. WE'RE HERE TO LOOK AT THE CODE AND HAVE.

HAS THIS APPLICANT MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE? AND THEY HAVE. AND THEY HAVE.

AND THAT'S. I'VE SEEN THIS HAPPEN OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

I MAY NOT LIKE THE HOUSE THAT SOMEONE WAS GOING TO BUILD NEXT DOOR TO ME.

I DON'T GET TO SAY, OH, I DON'T WANT YOU TO BUILD A HOUSE BECAUSE YOU'RE LIVING NEXT DOOR TO ME, GUYS, AS MS..

UNZICKER POINTED OUT.

AND THE BLAST RADIUS IS WITHIN THEIR PROPERTY.

THE BLAST IS GOING TO GO UP, NOT OUT.

THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER THINGS.

INDUSTRIES THAT EXIST IN THIS COMMUNITY RIGHT NOW THAT ARE PROBABLY MORE DANGEROUS THAN THIS THAT YOU DON'T EVEN REALIZE.

SO WITH THAT SAID, BUT LOOK, WE INCORPORATED INDIAN TOWN TO BRING JOBS AND PROSPERITY TO THIS COMMUNITY.

THIS IS ONE OF THOSE ONE OF THOSE INDUSTRIES TO ME IS A HOME RUN.

AND I WOULD JUST CAUTION EVERYBODY THAT IF WE START, AS SHE POINTED OUT, JUDGING THINGS BASED ON OUR FEELINGS, WE'RE GOING TO GO DOWN A RABBIT HOLE, GUYS, BECAUSE PEOPLE DO HAVE PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEY WILL.

IF THEY'RE DENIED AND THEY'VE MET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE AND THEY'VE INVESTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO IT, THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK.

THEY'RE GOING TO COME BACK WITH ATTORNEYS NEXT TO THEM.

AND WHEN THEY DO, THEY'RE GOING TO WIN.

OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH, MEMBER WATSON.

MEMBER PRESSLER MY OBJECTION WAS NOT BASED ON FEELINGS.

MY OBJECTION WAS BASED ON ZONING, AND I DON'T SEE THIS TYPE OF PRODUCT IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

SO. I REALIZE NOT EVERY TYPE OF BUSINESS CAN BE LISTED, BUT I'M JUST GOING BY THE APPLICANT'S OWN DESCRIPTION OF THE OF THE OF WHAT THEY DO THERE.

AND I DON'T FEEL I DON'T SEE THAT THAT IS LIGHT FITS AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

THANK YOU. REMEMBER PRESSLER? YES. I'M SORRY.

AM I ALLOWED TO SPEAK TO THAT? I BELIEVE YOU HAVE A COMMENT FOR MEMBERS HAYEK, BUT YEAH, IT'S WITHIN YOUR DISCRETION TO OPEN IT BACK UP TO TWO MEMBERS OF THE APPLICANT.

I WOULD ENCOURAGE IT.

I'M SORRY, MEMBERS.

I SEE. YEAH, I'M JUST.

WHERE ARE THE APARTMENTS AND HOW FAR AWAY ARE THE APARTMENTS OR HOW CLOSE ARE THEY? YOU WON'T ANSWER THAT BASED ON THE.

OVER MILES. I JUST WASN'T I DIDN'T KNOW WHERE THE THE APARTMENTS WERE, SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS.

THANK YOU. HI, I'M BRANDON ROTH.

I AM THE OWNER'S REP, THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER AND BUILDER.

SO WHAT I WANTED TO POINT OUT, FIRST OF ALL, PRIOR TO THE CLIENT BUYING THE PROPERTY, WE GOT A LETTER STATING THAT THIS SITE WAS ACCEPTABLE FOR THIS USE. WE ALSO GOT A LETTER FROM THE ATF SAYING THAT THIS SITE WAS ACCEPTABLE AND ON THAT BASIS WE MOVED FORWARD.

SO AS FAR AS ZONING GOES, THAT'S ALREADY IN THE PAST.

IT WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD.

SO THAT'S THE FIRST THING AS FAR AS MEETING BUILDING REQUIREMENTS.

ATF IS MORE STRICT THAN YOUR BUILDING REQUIREMENTS.

I'VE MET WITH THE CHIEF AS FAR AS FIRE PREVENTION ON THE SITE.

I'VE TAKEN CARE OF THAT.

THERE'S NOTHING THAT WE HAVEN'T MET SO FAR FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL THAT THIS SHOULD BE DENIED FOR ANY REASON.

BUT IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE, DO YOU HAVE ANY EXAMPLE OF WHERE IT'S IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL? THAT WAS YOUR DETERMINATION? NOT WELL, I DON'T SEE IT.

I MEAN, THERE WHATEVER THERE IS ON THE LIST ARE NOT SOMETHING YOU WOULD CALL DANGEROUS.

WE HAVE A LETTER FROM THE BOARD.

WHAT BOARD? FROM THE ZONING BOARD. IT'S NOT US.

FROM US. I MEAN, FROM THE ZONING.

THIS IS THE FIRST WE'VE EVER THE THE LETTER WAS FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

THIS FROM? IT WAS FROM THE ADMINISTRATION.

OKAY. FROM WHOM? SORRY. IT WAS FROM.

IT'S FROM ALTHEA. IT WAS FROM.

FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

OKAY. WHICH IS WHICH IS A FORMAL PROCESS FOR ZONING VERIFICATION SET FORTH IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

[01:20:06]

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THAT WASN'T I DON'T THINK THAT WAS INCLUDED IN OUR PACKET.

IT IS IN THE BACK UP AISLE.

LET ME FIND THE PAGE NUMBER.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I WILL. ONE SECOND AND I'M GOING TO OPEN IT BACK UP FOR ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC.

IF ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WANTS TO HAVE A COMMENT.

OH, I'M SORRY. DO YOU HAVE YOUR.

OH, YEAH. FILL OUT YOUR FORM.

IF ANYBODY IN THE IN THE IN THE PUBLIC HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE SOME LIGHT.

FILL OUT YOUR FORM AND TAKE IT OVER TO THE DESK.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

OKAY. GO AHEAD, MEMBERS.

HI. YEAH, I JUST HAD A QUESTION FOR THE GENTLEMAN HERE.

COULD YOU JUST HAVE YOU REACHED OUT TO ANY OF THE NEIGHBORS? MAYBE YOU COULD JUST TELL US IF YOU'VE HAD COMMUNICATIONS OR WHAT THEY'RE THEY'VE SAID TO YOU IN TERMS OF, WELL, THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT TO POST IT AND TO SEND LETTERS DIRECTLY TO THE NEIGHBORS.

WE WE DON'T HAVE ANY NEIGHBORS PER SE, AS FAR AS RESIDENCES IN ANY CLOSE PROXIMITY, BUT WE FOLLOWED WHATEVER THE BOARD REQUIREMENTS WERE.

THANK YOU. MEMBER ON SINGER I'D JUST LIKE TO CLARIFY WITH ALTHEA THAT YOU ARE THE ONES THAT DETERMINED THAT IT DID FIT INTO THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

BASED ON SOME OTHER RESEARCH THAT YOU DID.

IS THAT CORRECT? BASED ON WHAT'S CURRENTLY IN THE CODE AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? YES. AND THAT IS PART OF YOUR JOB TO DO THAT FOR THIS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

OKAY. ARE WE READY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? DONNA? CARMEN. OKAY, MISS CARMEN.

GOOD EVENING, DONNA. CARMEN.

I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE INDIAN TOWN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AND I JUST WANTED TO EXPRESS MY CONCERN REGARDING THE VILLAGE INCORPORATED SO THAT WE COULD GROW.

WE INCORPORATED SO THAT WE COULD ATTRACT INVESTMENT AND BUSINESSES TO THIS COMMUNITY TO BUILD IT UP.

I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S CONCERN ABOUT THE VOLATILITY OF SUCH A FACILITY, BUT IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, OUR PUBLIC FACILITIES, INCLUDING WATER PLANT STORES, VOLATILE CHEMICALS EVERY DAY, CHLORINE SALTS AND AMMONIA, THEY COULD EASILY CAUSE OR FEASIBLY CAUSE A SIMILAR REACTION IF ACCIDENTALLY HANDLED IMPROPERLY.

SO IT'S ALL BASED ON EXPERIENCE, KNOWLEDGE AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS ABOUT IT BEING CLOSE TO A NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE ALL HAVE OUR CONCERNS ABOUT WHAT MIGHT MOVE NEXT DOOR TO US, EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US.

ANY TIME THAT YOU HAVE ONE OF THESE MEETINGS, YOU ARE GOING TO BE FACED WITH THAT.

SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO THINK ABOUT THE FUTURE OF THE COMMUNITY, NOT NOT NEGATIVELY, BUT THE POTENTIAL THAT A BUSINESS OF THIS SIZE, 30 EMPLOYEES PER SHIFT, THREE SHIFTS WOULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT NOT ONLY ON THE TAX BASE, BUT TO THE RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY IN THE FUTURE OF OUR USE.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MA'AM.

WE HAVE ANY MORE PUBLIC COMMENTS? JOHN GILBERT.

HELLO, MY NAME IS JOHN GILBERT.

I'M A BUSINESS OWNER OUT HERE.

ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE'RE OUT HERE IS I TRIED TO START A BUSINESS IN REVERE BEACH, AND I'VE BEEN TO THE MEETINGS THAT WERE LIKE THIS.

AND WHEN YOU'RE TRYING TO START A BUSINESS SOMEWHERE AND YOU'RE TRYING TO DEAL WITH THE BOARD AND YOU'RE TRYING TO DO EVERYTHING RIGHT, AND THE BOARD CAN SHUT DOWN A BUSINESS, IT'S IT'S HEARTBREAKING.

AND IT WAS ON THOSE FEELINGS.

WELL, YOU MAY NOT HIRE ENOUGH PEOPLE.

YOUR PLANTS MAY NOT BE IN THE RIGHT SPOT.

YOUR LAMPS HAVE TO BE THIS HIGH AND YOU'RE LOSING WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO AS FAR AS GETTING PEOPLE BACK TO WORK.

THERE'S THIS EXPRESSION CALLED WORDS YOUR CHEAP ACTIONS, EVERYTHING I RECOMMEND.

I'VE DONE A TOUR OF THEIR FACILITY IN STUART.

AND IF YOU CAN LEAVE THERE.

AND WONDER WHY THEIR SECOND GUESSING GOING ON.

I SERIOUSLY QUESTION ANYBODY LOOKING AT ANY BUSINESS AND NOT LOOKING.

I LOOKED AT A FACILITY THAT WAS UNLIKE ANY OTHER FACILITY.

ONE OF THE LARGEST ARM MANUFACTURERS IN THE WORLD SAID IT WAS ONE OF THE BEST FACILITIES I'VE EVER SEEN.

SO I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE OWNER.

BUT IF YOU SEE WHAT HE'S GOT, THAT TELLS YOU EVERYTHING.

[01:25:01]

BUT WHEN YOU GET INTO THE FACILITY AND YOU LOOK AROUND ALL AROUND, IT IS BALL FIELDS AND EVERYTHING WHERE THERE'S CHILDREN AROUND OR THERE'S PEOPLE PLAYING. MARTIN COUNTY PROVED IT.

WITH LITERALLY BALL FIELDS WITHIN 100 FEET.

WE'RE TALKING A RESIDENCES OF OVER A MILE AWAY AND 250 FEET AWAY FROM THE ROAD.

THAT'S TREMENDOUS AMOUNT.

AND IF WE LOOK AROUND THIS TOWN AND LOOK AT THINGS THAT COULD BE CLOSER, IT COULD BE A BIGGER HAZARD.

WE REALLY HAVE TO LOOK AT WHAT WE'RE DOING.

BUT THE BIGGEST THING BACK IS IF IF, IF IF WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD AS THIS TOWN.

I DIDN'T GROW UP HERE, BUT I'VE BEEN HERE ABOUT TEN YEARS MANUFACTURING ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND AND IT'S LIGHT INDUSTRIAL THAT WHEN I WENT TO GET REAPPROVED THEY WERE SAYING, WELL, MAYBE WE MAY CHANGE THAT.

I'VE ALREADY BEEN THERE FOR YEARS.

AND THEY THOUGHT, WELL, MAYBE WE'LL JUST CHANGE THAT.

AND I THOUGHT, I KNOW YOU DON'T WANT TO GO ON RECORD AS SAYING THAT BECAUSE WITH EVERYBODY WANTING TO GO ELECTRIC VEHICLES, WHY WOULD WE BE CHANGING THE ZONING OF THAT HERE WHERE THAT'S JOBS FOR HERE? SO I JUST WANT TO SAY FROM A BOARD THAT I'VE SEEN IT IN OTHER TOWNS WHERE A SMALL COMPANY WANTED TO COME IN AND THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN THERE FOR SO LONG, THEY DON'T WANT IT CHANGED.

AND I GET IT.

BUT WE'RE TALKING A 20 MILE PIECE OF REAL ESTATE THAT TRULY IS RIGHT NOW IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE AND A MILE AWAY.

SO PLEASE KEEP THAT UNDER CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ALREADY ANOTHER PUBLIC COMMENT.

DAVID POWERS OKAY, MADAM CHAIR, WHILE HE'S APPROACHING THE PODIUM, THE LETTER IS FOUND ON PAGE 205 OF YOUR PACKET. MADAM CHAIR.

MEMBERS. MY NAME IS DAVID POWER.

SO THE RECORD, THIS WAS A 20 ACRE INDUSTRIAL PARK THAT SAT OUT THERE, PROBABLY APPROVED THROUGH MARTIN COUNTY FOR THE LAST 10 TO 12 YEARS. IT WAS CARVED UP INTO 12, TWO AND A HALF ACRE LOTS.

WE COULD HAVE HAD SEVERAL DIFFERENT COMPANIES COME THROUGH THERE.

WE HAD NO IDEA WHAT WOULD HAVE COME THROUGH THERE.

THAT WAS A GREAT FAMILY FROM UP NORTH.

THEY WERE GOING TO RELOCATE THEIR STAIR BUSINESS DOWN HERE AND START MANUFACTURING THEIR STAIRCASES THROUGH COVID.

THEY COULDN'T MAKE IT, SO THEN THEY HAD TO PUT THE LAND UP FOR SALE.

REINHARD CAME IN AND LOOKING FOR A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SPACE.

THERE IS NO SMALL FOOTPRINT.

INDUSTRIAL. THIS 20 ACRE SITE IS PROBABLY THE SMALLEST ONE THAT WE HAVE.

EVERYTHING ELSE IS HUNDREDS OF ACRES TO.

SO WE DID THE RIGHT THING.

WE CAME IN, WE CAME INTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT TO TALK TO THEM, TO SAY, IS THIS AN APPROVED USE PRIOR TO CLOSING ON THE LAND, PRIOR TO EVEN ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT, IT WAS SAID, YES, YOU CAN DO WHAT YOU WANT TO DO.

GIVE ME MORE INFORMATION, SHOW US THE BLAST, SHOW US ATF, SHOW US WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO.

WE WENT THROUGH THAT PROCESS.

THIS IS THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS THAT THEY'RE SPENDING ON THEIR PROFESSIONAL FEES EVERY DAY AS THEY'RE GRINDING.

AND THIS WAS PROBABLY A YEAR AND A HALF AGO THAT THAT WAS THE LETTER SIGNED, I DON'T EVEN KNOW, YEARS, HALF A YEAR AND A HALF HAVE GONE BY NOW.

AND NOW WE'RE COMING TO THE POINT WHERE IT'S AN APPROVED USE.

THEY'VE GONE THROUGH THE PROCESS AND NOW WE CAN'T COME TO THE BUSINESSES ARE LOOKING TO COME TO INDIAN TOWN.

THEY'RE WATCHING THESE THINGS ON TV.

AND IF WE CAN'T MAKE THESE DECISIONS HERE, THEN LET'S JUST GO TO THE COUNTY, LET'S GO TO THE COUNCIL AND LET'S ASK THEM TO MAKE THE DECISION.

BUT IT'S BEEN BROUGHT UP.

THERE'S BEEN NO PROOF. THEY'VE SHOWN EVERYTHING ENGINEERED OUT AND EVERYTHING.

AND SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS PROJECT.

THANK YOU. JOHN GILBERT, SENIOR.

MY NAME IS JOHN GILBERT.

AND LIKE MY SON AND I HAVE A BUSINESS HERE IN INDIANTOWN.

I WANT TO ADDRESS THE SAFETY OF WHAT THESE PEOPLE INTEND TO DO.

MARTIN COUNTY IS JUST FULL OF SHOOTERS, GUN ENTHUSIASTS, MANY OF THEM AS MYSELF, RELOAD OUR OWN AMMUNITION FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS, MAINLY FOR PRICE.

I'M AN AMATEUR.

ALL THE REST OF THE RELOAD IS IN HERE.

I WOULD CONSIDER AMATEURS.

THESE PEOPLE ARE PROFESSIONALS.

WHAT THEY'RE DOING.

I SAW THE FACILITY.

THESE PEOPLE. THESE PEOPLE ARE ARTISTS.

THESE PEOPLE KNOW WHAT TO DO AND DO IT.

AND IF THEY TOOK ANY OF THE RELOADING OF THE PEOPLE IN MARTIN COUNTY FROM THE HOME AND PUT IT IN IN THEIR SECURE

[01:30:09]

ENVIRONMENT.

IT'D BE DEFINITELY BENEFICIAL.

I REST MY CASE. HAVE YOU? ONE MORE QUESTION.

WHEN IS THE LAST TIME THERE WAS A FIRE OR EXPLOSION IN MARTIN COUNTY? PUTNAM COUNTY.

ULSTER COUNTY.

COUNTY. ORANGE COUNTY.

OF PEOPLE THAT WERE RELOADING THEIR OWN AMMUNITION IN THEIR HOUSE.

I REST MY CASE.

THANK YOU, SIR. OKAY.

OKAY. THIS WOULD BRING OUR OUR SEEING THAT WE HAVE NO MORE PUBLIC COMMENT THAT'S GOING TO BRING OUR PUBLIC COMMENT TO A CLOSE.

YOU WANT ME TO ENTERTAIN THE QUESTION? GO AHEAD. YOU WANT TO GO FIRST? OH, I'M SORRY, MR. WATSON.

I WOULD I WOULD JUST LIKE MAYBE THE APPLICANT CAN CLARIFY THIS.

GUYS, THERE'S NO BULLETS OUT HERE.

GUYS, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE THEY'RE MAKING THE PRIMER.

WHICH IS WHAT? WHEN THE PIN HITS THE BULLET, THERE'S A CHEMICAL CALLED A PRIMER, AND THERE IT'S VERY SMALL.

AND THAT ACTIVATES AND BURNS THE GUNPOWDER.

THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOING OUT HERE.

THERE'S NO BULLETS GOING TO BE FLYING ALL OVER THE PLACE SHOULD SOMETHING HAPPEN.

I JUST WANT TO CLEAR THAT FOR EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT IN THE AUDIENCE AND ON THIS BOARD.

THANK YOU, MR. WATSON. MRS..

HI. YEAH, I JUST, UM.

I'D JUST LIKE TO HIGHLIGHT WHAT THE SOME OF THE PEOPLE SAID AGAIN, AND YOU'RE A NEIGHBOR AND YOU LIVE YOU HAVE A PROPERTY RELATIVELY CLOSE TO THIS.

SO YOUR MAIN ISSUE WITH IT WAS THAT YOU WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE WAS NO OVERFLOW INTO YOUR WATER, BUT YOU DIDN'T.

IT SOUNDED LIKE YOU WERE OKAY WITH WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE DOING.

OKAY. YOU KNOW, I WAS THINKING ABOUT I GREW UP THERE.

I KNOW HOW THE WATER FLOWED FOR ALL THESE YEARS.

AND I HAVE A POND JUST ACROSS THE ROAD, YOU KNOW, THAT GOES INTO.

AND SO THAT'S THE THING I'M CONCERNED ABOUT.

I JUST THOUGHT THAT THAT WAS A, YOU KNOW, A GOOD JUST THAT YOU'RE CLOSE TO IT.

AND I, I DIDN'T SEE TOO MANY PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE HAVE SOMETHING IN TERMS TO SAY AGAINST THE THE USE THAT ARE IN THE AUDIENCE.

SO I JUST THOUGHT THAT THAT WAS NOTEWORTHY.

AND THEN IN TERMS OF THE EXPLOSIVE EXCUSE ME, THE WHATEVER THEY'RE DOING OUT THERE, I THOUGHT IT WAS AN INTERESTING POINT THAT THE CHAMBER MADE THAT, YOU KNOW, FERTILIZER OR OTHER THINGS CAN BE SOME SORT OF EXPLOSIVE MATERIAL.

AND THERE'S NO.

FEDERAL REGULATION OF THOSE ITEMS. SO OBVIOUSLY, WHENEVER YOU SEE EXPLOSIVE, YOU HAVE CONCERN.

BUT IF THERE IS A REQUIREMENT IN THERE IN COMPLIANCE, I THINK THAT THAT'S A THAT'S YOU CAN'T YOU HAVE TO GET THOSE APPROVALS, OBVIOUSLY.

AND THEN. YOU KNOW, I WOULD BASICALLY JUST SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE BUSINESS IS A GOOD THING.

AND IF SAFETY IS A CONCERN, I WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE THE FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS THAT IF YOU HAVE A CONCERN, YOU KNOW, SAY WHAT THE CONCERN IS, BUT MAYBE THERE'S AN ALTERNATIVE RATHER THAN AN OUTRIGHT REJECTION.

OKAY. AND THEN MORE COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD.

SO WE MAKE A MOTION.

RIGHT. OKAY.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD? ALL RIGHT. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT, BOARD MEMBERS, I NEED A MOTION.

I WOULD. I WOULD SUGGEST I'LL MAKE MY INITIAL MOTION AGAIN, AND HOPEFULLY WE GET THE PROPER SUPPORT AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS PROJECT.

I SECOND THE MOTION.

ROLL CALL. COULD I CLARIFY OR HAVE THAT RESTATED, YOU KNOW, RATHER THAN JUST SAY WHAT YOU WHAT YOU YOUR MOTION WAS BEFORE, THAT IT NOT CONTAIN ANY DIRECTIVE TO STAFF.

OKAY. ARE YOU TRYING TO MODIFY MY MOTION? WE'RE NOT DOING. HELLO? HELLO? WE'RE NOT DOING THAT.

WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IS STAY RESPECTFUL.

MEMBER WATSON, WOULD YOU PLEASE RESTATE YOUR MOTION, PLEASE? AND JUST IF YOU WOULD, JUST CLARIFY FOR ME.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. MY MOTION IS THAT WE APPROVE THE MAJOR SITE PLAN AND ISSUE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND INSTRUCT STAFF TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT PRIOR TO THE ACTUAL PERMIT FOR THE BUILDING TO RESOLVE THE OTHER OPEN ISSUES.

I SECOND THAT MOTION.

ROLL CALL. BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER.

NO. BOARD MEMBER HAYEK.

YES. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. NO. BOARD MEMBER MYLEE.

NO BOARD MEMBER.

CHAIR PALMER.

YES. OKAY.

MOTION PASSES. SO THE MOTION? YES. MOTION PASS.

[01:35:01]

MOTION PASSES. CORRECT.

OKAY. I WANT TO SAY SOMETHING TO THE BOARD AS WELL.

EXCUSE ME. I'D LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING TO THE BOARD, AS WELL AS THE MEMBERS OF THE VILLAGE AND THOSE THAT WILL BE BUILDING.

WE ARE ALL CONCERNED ABOUT INDIAN TOWN.

WE ALL ARE. WE MAY NOT UNDERSTAND A LOT OF THINGS, BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO LIVE IN INDIAN TOWN, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO UNDERSTAND AND RESPECT EACH OTHER. WHETHER WE AGREE OR DISAGREE.

SO IF WE CAN DO THAT, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A HARMONIOUS WHOLE.

ALL RIGHT. SO LET'S ALWAYS JUST REMEMBER, WE MAY NOT AGREE AND WE MAY AGREE, BUT IF WE CAN WORK TOGETHER, WE CAN WE CAN LEAVE INDIAN TOWN BETTER THAN WE FOUND IT. IS EVERYBODY IN AGREEMENT WITH THAT? YES. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO THE NEXT ITEM.

OK OUR NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA.

THOSE THAT ARE LEAVING, CAN YOU PLEASE LEAVE QUIETLY SO WE CAN CONTINUE OUR MEETING? THANK YOU FOR COMING, MAN.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ALL RIGHT. NEXT ON OUR AGENDA IS APPLICATION NUMBER KSP, DASH 21, DASH 625.

[3.  APPLICATION NO. SP-21-625: A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR RIVER OAK PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF S.W. FAMEL BOULEVARD, WEST OF FERNWOOD FORREST ROAD, NORTH OF THE ST. LUCIE CANAL AND SOUTH OF S.W. MARKET STREET. PARCEL APPROXIMATELY 55 ACRES IN SIZE.]

A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR RIVER OAK PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTHWEST FERNDALE BOULEVARD, WEST OF FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD, NORTH OF THE ST LUCIE CANAL AND SOUTH OF SOUTHWEST MARKET STREET PARCEL.

APPROXIMATELY 55 ACRES IN SIZE.

ALL RIGHT, STAFF.

MADAM CHAIR, I'LL GO AHEAD AND DO MY LITTLE SPEECH ONCE AGAIN FOR THE FOLKS WHO ARE TAKING IT DOWN IN THE COURT.

REPORTER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, IF ANY INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING THE APPLICANT AND THE INTERVENERS, STAFF, WITNESSES OR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC PLAN TO SPEAK OR OFFER TESTIMONY DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING IN THIS MATTER, I'D ASK YOU TO PLEASE RISE AND BE SWORN BY THE VILLAGE CLERK.

I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO.

YES, MA'AM. IS EVERYONE STANDING? PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

FOR A LONG NIGHT. AND BEFORE.

BEFORE I GO INTO MY LITTLE SPEECH ONE MORE TIME.

JUST A RECOMMENDATION FOR EVERYONE, BECAUSE THERE IS SOMEONE HERE TAKING IT DOWN A COURT REPORTER.

I WOULD ENCOURAGE EVERYONE, PLEASE SPEAK ONE AT A TIME AND NOT SPEAK OVER EACH OTHER.

MAKES IT VERY DIFFICULT FOR EVERYONE LOOKING BACK ON IT LATER, IF YOU EVER HAVE TO LOOK BACK ON IT LATER.

THIS APPLICATION APPLICATION NUMBER SP DASH 21.

DASH 625 IS QUASI JUDICIAL IN NATURE, WHICH REQUIRES THIS PUBLIC HEARING TO COMPLY WITH PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED IN FLORIDA LAW.

QUASI JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE LESS FORMAL THAN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A CIRCUIT COURT, BUT ARE MORE FORMAL THAN A NORMAL PCB MEETING AND MUST FOLLOW BASIC STANDARDS OF NOTICE AND DUE PROCESS.

THE BOARD'S DECISION MUST BE MADE BASED ON COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL FACT BASED TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD IN ITS DELIBERATION AND VOTING ON THIS ITEM.

PURE SPECULATION OR MERE OPINION, NOT BASED ON COMPETENT FACTS, CANNOT BE LEGALLY CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD IN WEIGHING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE APPLICATION TESTIMONY WITH FACT BASED SUPPORT SUCH AS MINUTES, SURVEYS, ENGINEERING REPORTS AND THE LIKE MAY BE CONSIDERED COMPETENT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.

IF YOU INTEND TO SPEAK, PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND WHEN YOU COME FORWARD.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME CLEARLY FOR THE RECORD, WHETHER OR NOT YOU'VE BEEN SWORN, WHETHER OR NOT YOU'VE BEEN SWORN, AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS OR INTERESTS IN THE MATTER.

WE ALSO ASK THAT YOU SUBMIT A SPEAKER CARD TO INCLUDE IN THE RECORD.

VILLAGE CLERK. HAS THIS ITEM BEEN PROPERLY ADVERTISED? YES, THIS ITEM WAS PROPERLY ADVERTISED AND THE RECORD INCLUDES DOCUMENTATION TO THAT EFFECT.

THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, IF ANY BOARD MEMBER HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THEM FROM VOTING ON THIS ITEM.

I WOULD ASK YOU TO PLEASE DISCLOSE THIS FOR THE RECORD.

COMPLETE THE REQUIRED VOTING CONFLICT FORM AND PROVIDE IT TO THE VILLAGE CLERK.

[01:40:02]

IS THERE ANYONE WHO NEEDS TO DISCLOSE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME? HEARING NONE. I WILL PROCEED FORWARD IF ANY BOARD MEMBER HAS HAD ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT INCLUDES COMMUNICATIONS WITH ANYBODY CONCERNING THIS ITEM OUTSIDE OF THIS MEETING OR CONDUCTED A SITE VISIT OR ANYTHING OF THE LIKE, OR RECEIVED ANY COMMUNICATIONS CONCERNING THIS ITEM.

OUTSIDE OF THIS MEETING, I WOULD ASK YOU TO PLEASE DISCLOSE THAT BY IDENTIFYING THE SUBJECT OF THE COMMUNICATION AND IDENTIFY THE PERSON OR GROUP OR ENTITY WITH WHOM THE COMMUNICATION TOOK PLACE OR ANY CORRESPONDENCE YOU RECEIVED.

IS THERE ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO MAKE A DISCLOSURE? BOARD MEMBER WATSON YES.

FOR THE RECORD, I'VE SPOKEN TO GEORGE LINDEMAN, THE OWNER OF THE APPLICANT, THE OWNER OF THE COMPANY OF THE APPLICANT, SPOKE WITH HIM ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, MUCH PRIOR TO SITTING ON THE BOARD, BUT SPOKE WITH HIM.

I BELIEVE IT WAS EITHER MONDAY OR TUESDAY THIS WEEK.

AND SPECIFIC ABOUT THE SITE PLAN AND WHAT'S TAKING PLACE.

ANY OTHER DISCLOSURES AT THIS TIME? YES, MA'AM. YES.

I SPOKE WITH THREE RESIDENTS, INDIAN TOWN RESIDENTS, TWO IN ONE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ONE IN ANOTHER, RONNIE HATAWAY, DEBBIE BANKS AND CHERIE DENNIS, AND ALSO ONE COUNCIL MEMBER, JANET HERNANDEZ.

I SPOKE WITH MR. GEORGE. I CAN'T EVEN REMEMBER ONE.

BUT IT WAS. IT WAS REGARDING OUR PROJECT THAT WE WERE BUILDING.

BUT NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS PROJECT.

ALL RIGHT. MADAM CHAIR.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE. I'LL TURN IT BACK TO YOU TO TURN IT OVER FOR STAFF'S PRESENTATION.

OKAY. STAFF, WILL YOU PLEASE PROCEED WITH YOUR PRESENTATION ON THIS ITEM? MADAM CHAIR, I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO THE PROJECT PLANNER TO MAKE HIS PRESENTATION.

AGAIN. GOOD EVENING, JEFF KATIMS, CONSULTING PLANNER FOR THE VILLAGE.

THE THE APPLICANT HAS A VERY GOOD POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AS WELL.

SO THEY'RE GOING TO COVER SOME OF THIS IN A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT WAY THAN I WILL.

THAT WILL THAT WILL REALLY HELP YOU WITH THE DETAILS.

THIS IS THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN YELLOW WITH FORMAL BOULEVARD ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE, ON THE EXTREME RIGHT HAND SIDE WHERE THE SQUARISH PIECE SORT OF JUTS OUT.

THAT'S FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD.

AND THE ST LUCIE CANALS ON THE SOUTH ON THE BOTTOM.

THIS ONE IS INTERESTING.

IT HAS THREE DIFFERENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND THREE DIFFERENT ZONING DESIGNATIONS.

THE NORTH PART IN THE PINK ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE IS ZONED VILLAGE MIXED SLUDGE CORE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION. THE LEFT PORTION OF THE SITE BELOW THAT, WHICH IS SORT OF AN ORANGE COLOR, IS NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE ON THE ZONING MAP AND URBAN RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ON THE LAND USE PLAN MAP.

AND THE REMAINDER IS LIMITED RESIDENTIAL ON THE ZONING MAP AND SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL.

ON THE LAND USE MAP.

AND EACH ONE OF THOSE ZONING CATEGORIES IMPLEMENTS THE ASSOCIATED FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.

WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT BECAUSE THE THERE ARE THERE ARE MULTIPLE ZONING DISTRICTS, EACH PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT HAS TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES THAT APPLY TO THAT PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THAT DESIGNATED AREA.

THIS IS THE OVERALL SITE PLAN.

THAT'S 176 LOTS AND 176 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON ABOUT 55 ACRES.

IT FEATURES A MIX OF ATTACHED AND DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS AND HAS ENTRANCES FROM FENNEL OAK STREET. PAM DRIVE AND PAM DRIVE.

IT ALSO FEATURES TWO WETLAND PRESERVES.

THIS IS THE NORTHERN PORTION AND I'M JUST GOING TO GO BACK ONE WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THIS.

NORTH IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE BECAUSE OF THE THE DIMENSIONS.

THE THERE'S A THE SITE KIND OF LONGER THAN IT IS WIDE.

SO THE PLANS SHOW IT SIDEWAYS.

SO IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE TOP, THAT'S WEST.

IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE RIGHT, THAT'S NORTH.

YOU CAN SEE THE NORTH ARROW.

THE ST LUCIE CANAL IS ON THE LEFT.

[01:45:08]

OK WE JUST SKIPPED.

OKAY. HERE WE GO.

THIS IS THE NORTHERN PORTION THAT'S ZONED VILLAGE MIXED USE.

THIS IS 62 LOTS.

THAT WILL BE SOME SORT OF ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY.

AND THAT CAN MEAN DUPLEXES WHERE EACH UNIT IS ON ITS OWN LOT.

THAT COULD MEAN TOWNHOMES OR SOME VERSION OF THAT.

AND THIS FEATURES ITS OWN ENTRANCE FORMAL.

THAT'S THE ONLY ENTRANCE TO THIS PART.

THIS PART IS NOT CONNECTED TO THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT BY ROADWAYS.

THERE IS AN INTERNAL PATHWAY FOR FOR PEOPLE TO WALK OR RIDE THEIR BIKE TO GET TO THE WETLAND PRESERVE, WHICH IS ON THE REMAINDER.

THE OTHER PORTION OF THIS, THIS SITE, THIS FEATURES THE MAIN ENTRANCE DRIVE COMING IN, WILL NOT BE GATED.

THESE WILL BE PUBLICLY DEDICATED, DEDICATED STREETS.

THERE'S A BIG LANDSCAPE MEDIAN YOU CAN SEE WHICH IS GOT VILLAGE MIXED USE WRITTEN OVER IT AND THERE'LL BE GUEST PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF THAT.

AND THEN THERE'S BASICALLY AN ALLEY IN BETWEEN THE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BLOCK ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE.

THIS IS THE REMAINDER OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

AND HERE YOU CAN SEE THAT WE'VE GOT MULTIPLE ENTRANCES ALL INDICATED BY THE ORANGE ARROWS.

SO IN ADDITION TO HAVING ANOTHER ENTRANCE ON FEMALE, IT CONNECTS TO THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE EAST.

THAT'S ACTUALLY SOMETHING THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ENCOURAGE.

UM, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE DASHED LINE RUNNING DOWN THE MIDDLE FROM LEFT TO RIGHT.

THAT'S THE ZONING BOUNDARY BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE AND LIMITED RESIDENTIAL.

THE NORTH, THE PORTION ON THE TOP, WHICH IS NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE.

WE'LL HAVE WRITTEN DOWN HERE 16 TOWNHOME LOTS AND 98 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY LOTS.

YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S A WETLAND PRESERVE.

THE LARGEST ONE IS ON THE THE RIGHT SIDE OF THAT CIRCULAR BLOCK.

RIGHT. AND AND BELOW IT.

AND THERE'S A PORTION ALSO TO THE LEFT OF IT, AND THERE'S APPROXIMATELY SEVEN ACRES OF WETLANDS HERE.

IT'S A LITTLE MORE THAN SEVEN ACRES.

THERE'S A PATH THAT WOULD LEAD DOWN TO THE CANAL THAT RUNS CLOSE TO THE LOCATION OF THAT DASH LINE THAT SEPARATES THE ZONING DISTRICTS.

AND AGAIN, THERE'S MORE LANDSCAPE MEDIANS WITH GUEST PARKING ON EITHER SIDE.

WHAT WE DON'T HAVE AS PART OF THIS SITE PLAN IS ANYTHING RELATING TO ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING PLANS OF ANY KIND.

AND I KNOW THAT FOR THE PREVIOUS ITEM THERE WERE COMMENTS ABOUT SOME OF THESE THINGS AREN'T REALLY SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS IN THIS IN THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

THESE ACTUALLY ARE SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS.

BUT BECAUSE THE APPLICANT WAS NOT PREPARED TO GO FORWARD WITH THESE AT THIS TIME, WE DECIDED THAT WE WOULD TAKE THIS FORWARD FOR CONSIDERATION ON THE MERITS OF THE LAYOUT AND THE OTHER ASPECTS, AND THEY CAN COME BACK ANOTHER TIME AND GET THE APPROVALS FOR THE THE ARCHITECTURE AND THE FLOOR PLANS.

THE CODE ACTUALLY REQUIRES THAT CERTAIN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND THERE'S A CHOICE OF THEM BE FOLLOWED FOR, FOR SOME OF THE RESIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS.

THERE'S ONE PORTION, THE LIMITED RESIDENTIAL THAT DOES NOT HAVE ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS, BUT BECAUSE THIS IS ALL ONE DEVELOPMENT, ONE OF THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IS THAT WHATEVER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE IS CHOSEN FOR THE TWO ZONING DISTRICTS THAT DO HAVE THE REQUIREMENT BE CARRIED OVER TO THE ONE THAT DOESN'T, OTHERWISE IT WILL LOOK JUST DISJOINTED.

THIS IS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, WHICH IS HARD TO REALLY MAKE OUT AT THE SCALE AGAIN, WHICH IS WHY IT'S BROKEN UP INTO SO MANY DIFFERENT SHEETS.

BUT IF YOU IF YOU CAN LOOK AT THE EDGES, WE HIGHLIGHTED THE LANDSCAPE PERIMETER LANDSCAPING JUST SO THAT YOU CAN AT LEAST GET A SENSE OF THAT.

SO THERE'S A ROW OF TREES THAT'S GOING TO LINE OAK, OAK STREET, THERE'S A LINE OF TREES, IT'S GOING TO LINE FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD, AND THERE'S A LINE OF TREES THAT'S GOING TO LINE FOR MILL BOULEVARD.

[01:50:05]

ALSO, INTERNALLY, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THE MEDIANS ARE LANDSCAPED AND THEY'VE GOT STREET TREES THROW OUT.

THEY HAVE A TREE SURVEY OR A TREE INVENTORY THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE PLANS.

AND THERE ARE SOME 1600 TREES THAT WILL BE PRESERVED.

MOST OF THOSE WOULD BE IN THE WETLANDS THAT ARE BEING PRESERVED.

AND THE CODE DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT THEY THAT THEY PRESERVE OR MITIGATE ANY TREES THAT ARE WITHIN THE AREA THAT'S GOING TO BE DEVELOPED AS WELL.

THERE ARE 19 SPECIMEN OAK TREES.

THESE ARE JUST UNIQUE TREES, FAIRLY MATURE TREES THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD LIKE TO AND HAS ACTUALLY PROPOSED TO TRY TO RELOCATE OR PRESERVE. THOSE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO ANY KIND OF MITIGATION REQUIREMENT IN THE EVENT THAT FOR SOME REASON THEY DON'T TRANSPLANT, THE DEVELOPER IS DOING THAT ON THEIR OWN VOLITION.

OK. THIS ONE SHOWS EDGE CONDITIONS AND IN RED, WHAT WE'RE JUST SHOWING YOU IS HOW THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS SITE ARE GOING TO TRANSITION FROM A GRADE PERSPECTIVE TO WHAT'S AROUND IT.

BY GRADE, WE MEAN THE LEVEL OF THE GROUND.

SO IN ORDER TO MEET FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS TO HOLD THEIR OWN STORMWATER ON SITE, THE SITE AS A WHOLE NEEDS TO BE ELEVATED AND THE PARAMETERS OF THE SITE NEED TO BE FIRMED OR SWELLED IN MANY CASES TO KEEP THE STORMWATER ON SITE.

AND SO WHAT YOU CAN SEE IS ALONG OAK STREET AND FOREST FERN FOREST BOULEVARD AND ALONG THE REAR OF THE LOTS THAT ARE ON SOUTHWEST.

UH, PINE VIEW AVENUE.

THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF AN ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LOTS THAT ARE THERE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF.

AND SO THE WAY THAT THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO ACCOMMODATE THAT GRADE DIFFERENCE IS THROUGH SOME RELATIVELY SMALL RETAINING WALLS THAT ARE RANGING BETWEEN TWO AND FOUR FEET IN HEIGHT, BUT TYPICALLY CLOSER TO, SAY, THREE FEET.

YOU SEE THE SAME THING ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE DRAWING.

THERE'S THERE'S UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY THERE.

AND YOU SEE THE SAME THING ON THE NORTH SIDE, RIGHT UNDER WHERE IT SAYS EDGE CONDITIONS.

THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS ALL THE WAY ON THE RIGHT, THE RIGHT BORDER OF THE SCREEN, IS NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY RETAINING WALL.

IT IS GOING TO HAVE A BERM THAT'S GOING TO ACCOMMODATE THE GRADE DIFFERENCE.

AND ALONG FEMALE, THERE'S JUST NATURAL TRANSITION TO GRADE THAT THAT ACCOMMODATES THE DIFFERENCE THERE.

OKAY. THIS PARTICULAR DRAWING HERE IS CALLED A SECTION VIEW.

AND IT SHOWS IF YOU WERE STANDING ON THE GROUND LOOKING AT THE EDGE OF THE PROPERTY, WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE.

AND YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE, THAT'S THE DEVELOPMENT AND THAT WOULD BE A PARTICULAR LOT.

AND THEN THERE'S THERE RETAINING WALL, WHICH YOU CAN SEE.

NEXT TO WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE IS, AND THEN THERE'S A LITTLE DROP IN ELEVATION TO WHAT'S OUTSIDE THE DEVELOPMENT.

OK AGAIN.

MADAM CHAIR, IF I CAN SUMMARIZE THE RECOMMENDATIONS, IF THAT'S OKAY, I WILL DO THAT.

GREAT. NUMBER ONE IS THE STANDARD CONDITION THAT THE PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS APPROVAL WOULD NEED TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ONES THAT YOU'VE CONSIDERED HERE TONIGHT.

NUMBER TWO IS THAT PLANNING IS REQUIRED BEFORE THESE BEFORE THE LOTS CAN BE SUBDIVIDED INTO 176 LOTS. SO UNTIL SUCH TIME AS A SUBDIVISION PLAT IS RECORDED, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL REMAIN UNDER UNIFIED OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL AND NO BUILDING PERMITS FOR A PRINCIPAL BUILDING WHICH WOULD BE A HOME SHALL BE ISSUED.

NUMBER THREE.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR A RESIDENCE.

A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS AND THE HOUSING PRODUCT DETAILS, AS WELL AS SIGN AND LIGHTING ALL THE THINGS THAT THE CODE REQUIRES BUT THE DEVELOPER DIDN'T HAVE READY AT THIS POINT.

NUMBER FOUR WAS WHAT I MENTIONED EARLIER, THAT ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY IS GOING TO BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO RECONCILE THE LACK OF ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENT IN ONE OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS, EVEN THOUGH THE OTHER TWO HAVE THOSE REQUIREMENTS.

[01:55:01]

NUMBER FIVE, PROVIDE EITHER A UNITY OF TITLE OR A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO MAINTAIN THE COMMON AREAS, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING, RETAINING WALLS AND THE WETLANDS.

DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, WHICH REGULATES THE WETLAND PRESERVATION AND IMPACTS, INDICATE THAT IT WILL BE A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. OOPS.

NUMBER SIX, THERE'S A COMMUNITY ENTRY SIGN ON LOT 166.

SO THEY'LL NEED TO BE A SIGNAGE EASEMENT GRANTED FOR THAT.

THEY'LL BE THEY'LL NEED TO OBTAIN A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT PRIOR TO SITE CLEARING.

THE DEVELOPER SHALL PRESERVE THE 1064 TREES THAT THEY INVENTORIED AND STATED IN THEIR INVENTORY THAT THEY WOULD PRESERVE ANY TREES NOT PRESERVED WOULD BE MITIGATED WITH AN EQUIVALENT WITH AN EQUIVALENT, WHAT WE CALL DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT, WHICH IS THE WIDTH OF THE TREE.

FOR EXAMPLE, IF A TREE HAD A 40 INCH CIRCUMFERENCE, YOU COULD MITIGATE THAT WITH 410 INCHES TO COME FROM TREES OR TO 20 INCH CIRCUMFERENCE TREES OR WHAT HAVE YOU.

NUMBER NINE THAT THE DEVELOPER MAKE ITS BEST EFFORTS TO RELOCATE THE 19 SPECIMEN OAKS THAT IT STATES IT WANTS TO TO RELOCATE TEN REVISED PLANS TO RELOCATE STREET TREES OUT OF UTILITY EASEMENTS INTO THE ROADSIDE SWALES WHEREVER FEASIBLE.

NUMBER 11 TO REVISE THE PLANS TO SHOW THE SIDEWALKS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE CIRCULAR BLOCK AT OR CLOSER TO THE EDGE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY TO ACCOMMODATE STREET TREE PLACEMENT.

NUMBER 12.

THIS IS THE PRESERVE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN.

THEY'LL BE REQUIRED TO RECORD THIS ANYWAY.

SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT IS GOING TO REQUIRE THAT.

AND WE'VE GOT SOME SUGGESTED LANGUAGE THAT WE ASKED THAT THEY ADD TO IT THAT THEY AGREED TO ADD.

THIS WILL NEED TO BE RECORDED IN THE COUNTY RECORDS AND CAN ONLY BE AMENDED WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL.

AND ULTIMATELY SOUTH FEDERAL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND THEN RE RECORDED IN THE COUNTY.

RECORDS NUMBER 13 CONFIRM LEGAL USE OF PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE MILL BOULEVARD FOR A SWALE DRAINAGE OUTFALL.

14 PROVIDE AN EASEMENT WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH OR PLAT OR PLAT RECORD ATION FOR THE PROPOSED WATER MAIN EASEMENT TO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.

15. PROVIDE A QUITCLAIM DEED WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH OR PLAT RECORD ATION FOR DEDICATION OF A CORNER CLIP AT SOUTHWEST OAK STREET AND FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD.

AND 16 INSTALL A NEW EIGHT INCH PVC WATER MAIN ALONG FROM L BOULEVARD.

THERE YOU GO. PARALLEL TO THE EXISTING WATER MAIN ALONG THE DEVELOPMENT FRONTAGE DEVELOPMENT, THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE GIVEN A CONNECTION FEE CREDIT FOR SET IMPROVEMENT.

THAT CONCLUDES THE STAFF PRESENTATION AND THE LIST OF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

AND THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO THESE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THEIR FINALIZATION.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THAT PRESENTATION.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD TO STAFF? OH, HOLD ON. OKAY.

SHE WAS THE FIRST OK.

GREAT MEMBER OF SINGER.

YES, I HAVE SEVERAL QUESTIONS.

FIRST OF ALL, WILL THIS DEVELOPMENT HAVE ANY 55 OR OLDER PORTION TO IT THAT YOU KNOW OF? NO SUCH INTENTION HAS BEEN MADE.

MADE HAS BEEN REPRESENTED TO STAFF.

WILL THESE HOMES BE SALE? HOMES FOR SALE, OR WILL THERE IN ANY PART OF THEM BE APARTMENTS OR RENTAL UNITS? THE DEVELOPER DID MENTION EARLY ON IN THE PROCESS THAT THEY WOULD PROBABLY BE RENTALS, BUT YOU'D HAVE TO ASK THE THE APPLICANT.

I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S CHANGED.

AND EVEN WHATEVER THEY REPRESENT NOW AND TODAY, THEY CAN CHANGE IN THE FUTURE.

OKAY. ARE ANY OF THE BUILDINGS PROPOSED MOBILE HOME UNITS? NO. AND THEY'RE NOT PERMITTED.

ARE THERE ANY SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNITS IN THIS PROJECT? THE DEVELOPER HASN'T MADE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OF THAT.

WILL THERE BE ANY WATER ACCESS BOAT ACCESS TO THE CANAL? THERE ARE SEVERAL LOTS THAT HAVE REAR YARD ACCESS TO THE CANAL AND THEY COULD POTENTIALLY, WITH THE PROPER APPROVALS, HAVE DOCKS AS WELL.

THERE'S THERE'S A PATH THAT GOES DOWN TO THE WATER AND THE DEVELOPER COULD AGAIN WITH THE RIGHT APPROVALS, INSTALL SOME SORT OF DOCK EDGE THERE.

[02:00:07]

DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA DO THEY INTEND TO HAVE COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS OTHER THAN THE COUNTY'S RESTRICTIONS? DOES THE DEVELOPER PLAN ON HAVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS IN THE IN THE.

ARE YOU REFERRING TO THINGS LIKE ARCHITECTURAL AND FENCE COLORS AND STUFF LIKE THAT AND SIZE LIMITATIONS ON THE HOUSING AND THAT KIND OF THING? DON'T KNOW. YOU HAVE TO ASK THE DEVELOPER THAT QUESTION.

OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

OKAY. THAT WAS VERY GOOD QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. MEMBER OF SINGER.

MEMBER WATSON.

YES. MY FIRST QUESTION AND BEAR WITH ME BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT OF EDUCATION, I THINK, FOR EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM.

BUT THE STAFF KNOW HOW THAT THREE DIFFERENT LAND USES WERE PLACED ON ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY DURING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS.

SAY IT AGAIN? I SAY THE STAFF KNOW HOW THREE DIFFERENT LAND USES GOT PLACED ON ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY DURING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESS, WHICH TOOK PLACE ABOUT TWO AND A HALF, THREE YEARS AGO. YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.

I'D LIKE TO KNOW THAT TOO.

AND I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER.

WITH THAT SAID, DO YOU FIND THAT INTERESTING? YES. OKAY.

NOW, FOR THE EDIFICATION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN INDIAN TOWN.

LET ME LET ME FILL YOU IN ON THIS.

PRIOR TO INCORPORATION, THE PROPERTY THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WAS WAS ONE LOT.

AND IT WAS ZONED FIVE UNITS AN ACRE UNDER MARTIN COUNTY LAND.

FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING DURING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESS IN INDIAN TOWN.

THAT WAS SOMEHOW MAGICALLY CHANGED TO THREE DIFFERENT LAND USES.

NOW LET ME GO BACK HERE FOR A SECOND.

WHEN WE WERE GOING TO WRITE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE BOARD VOTED TO FORM A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE THAT WAS GOING TO WRITE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF BONNIE LANDRY.

THAT BOARD WAS MADE UP OF, I THINK, SEVEN OR EIGHT OF US FROM INDIAN.

I WAS ON IT. KEVIN POWERS ON IT, ROGER BULMER WAS ON IT, MR. WILLIAMS WAS ON. THERE WERE SEVERAL, SEVERAL PEOPLE FROM THE COMMUNITY THAT WERE ON THAT BOARD.

THEY WERE GOING TO HELP WRITE THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO MAKE SURE TO ENSURE THAT WE PROTECTED THE ASSETS IN INDIAN TOWN, PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN TOWN, BECAUSE WE HAVE LOCAL KNOWLEDGE.

WE KNOW EVERYBODY.

WE KNOW WHAT FERNWOOD IS, YOU KNOW, AS A UNIQUE NEIGHBORHOOD AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

WELL, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL REMEMBER THIS, BUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE WAS DISSOLVED QUITE MYSTERIOUSLY.

AND WHEN IT HAPPENED, I RAISED HOLY HELL.

I WROTE LETTERS TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL.

I PUT THOSE LETTERS OUT ON FACEBOOK.

I LET EVERYBODY KNOW THAT I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON HERE, BUT SOMETHING NEFARIOUS IS GOING ON HERE BECAUSE WHY WOULD YOU ELIMINATE THE VERY PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO ENSURE THAT INDIAN TOWN'S PLANNING GOES THE WAY IT SHOULD? SO THAT BOARD WAS ELIMINATED.

SO NOW LET ME FAST FORWARD.

WHEN THIS PROJECT GOT PROPOSED, MY PHONE STARTED RINGING.

PEOPLE WERE SAYING, SCOTT, WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT I UNDERSTAND THIS STUFF.

I HAVE A LOT EXPERIENCE.

I SERVED ON MARTIN COUNTY'S LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY FOR FOUR YEARS.

I UNDERSTAND THIS STUFF.

SO THEY SAID, SCOTT, WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? SO I SAID, WELL, LET ME LET ME PULL THIS UP NOW.

AT THE TIME OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WE WERE JUST USING PAPER MAPS THAT SHOWED LINE DRAWINGS.

BUT NOW WHEN I GET THE PHONE CALLS, WE HAVE ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS.

WE CAN PUT PUSH ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY AND SEE WHAT IT ZONED AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

SO I LOOKED DOWN AT THE MAP AND I SEE WHAT LOOKS TO BE TO ME TO BE THREE SEPARATE PIECES OF PROPERTY.

BUT WHEN I CLICK ON IT, IT SHOWS UP AS ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY WITH THREE DIFFERENT LAND USES ON IT.

AND I GO, WOW, THAT'S VERY UNUSUAL.

HOW DID THAT HAPPEN? THEN I SAID, WELL, LET ME LOOK AROUND A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THE MAP, AND I CLICK A FEW OTHER THINGS AND I GO, WOW, THIS HAPPENED SOMEWHERE ELSE.

AND IT DAWNED ON ME RIGHT THEN AND THERE WHY THAT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE WAS DISSOLVED.

IT DAWNED ON ME RIGHT THEN AND THERE, BECAUSE WHAT HAPPENED THERE WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED HAD WE HAD A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMITTEE MADE UP OF MEMBERS OF THIS COMMITTEE WATCHING WHAT WAS GOING ON.

RIGHT. AND THEN I WENT BACK TO THAT.

THEN I WENT BACK AND I LOOKED AT THE FIRST ROUGH DRAFT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, WHICH THIS STUFF IS CONFUSING, BUT BEAR WITH ME.

WE HAD A FORMAL PROCESS THAT WE WERE ALL SUPPOSED TO GO THROUGH.

WE WERE SUPPOSED TO PUT OUR COMMENTS IN AND OUR WANTS AND OUR LIKES AND ALL.

IT WAS GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS FORMAL PROCESS.

WELL, PRIOR TO THAT FORMAL PROCESS.

WHEN THE FIRST ROUGH DRAFT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP CAME OUT.

ALL THOSE CHANGES WERE ALREADY ON THAT MAP.

IT DIDN'T GO THROUGH THE OFFICIAL PROCESS.

IT WAS ALREADY ON THAT MAP.

SO THAT'S NOW FAST FORWARD TO WHEN I WENT.

AHA. NOW I KNOW WHY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE WAS DISSOLVED.

THAT'S MY OPINION.

[02:05:03]

THAT'S MY OPINION NOW.

WITH THAT SAID.

YOU HAD ABOUT FIVE UNITS AN ACRE.

IT WAS AT 50 SOMEBODY. SO YOU HAD ABOUT UNDER MARTIN COUNTY, YOU HAD ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF 250 UNITS TO 75, 285 UNITS.

EXCUSE ME A SECOND. WITH THE NEW LAND USES THAT WERE APPLIED TO THAT PROPERTY, YOU HAD CLOSE TO PROBABLY 600 UNITS THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED ON THAT PROPERTY. SO AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, I WAS ENRAGED BY WHAT I SAW.

I CALLED CERTAIN PEOPLE AND I TALKED TO HIM ABOUT IT.

AND THEN I CALLED MR. LINDEMAN, WHO PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY.

AFTER ALL THIS HAD TAKEN PLACE.

HE WAS NOT AWARE OF WHAT HAD TAKEN PLACE.

AND I SAID, MR. LEHMAN, THIS IS PROBABLY THE MOST BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD IN INDIAN TOWN.

AND WE HAVE A PROBLEM HERE.

SOMEONE PULLED SOMETHING.

AND THIS IS GOING TO DESTROY THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND I SAID, THIS IS NOT THE PLACE TO DO THAT.

SO WE HAD THOSE DISCUSSIONS EARLY ON.

I DIDN'T KNOW MR. LEMON, BUT I'M TALKING TO HIM ON THE PHONE.

BECAUSE I FEEL RESPONSIBLE.

I'M ONE OF THE GUY WROTE THE FIRST CHECK MYSELF AND JILL WALSH WROTE THE FIRST CHECKS TO INCORPORATE THIS VILLAGE.

WHEN THIS VILLAGE BECAME A TOWN THE DAY WE WERE INCORPORATED, I WROTE A CHECK FOR $1,000 TO THE TO THE TO THE TO PUT IN THE BANK SO YOU COULD BUY A PAPER AND PENCILS.

SO I FEEL SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT'S TAKING PLACE HERE.

BUT IT TOOK PLACE BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.

THAT'S RIGHT. AND IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY WE'VE BEEN SO UPSET ABOUT A LOT OF THINGS, THIS IS WHY THERE'S MORE SURPRISES TO COME.

BUT WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY, HOPEFULLY IN THE NEAR FUTURE TO FIX SOME OF THAT.

BUT UNFORTUNATELY, THE CAT'S OUT OF THE BAG.

ONCE THOSE LAND USE HAS BEEN PLACED ON THOSE PROPERTY, YOU CAN'T TAKE IT AWAY.

BUT WITH THAT SAID, I WILL SAY THIS AND I KNOW I MIGHT NOT MAKE SOME PEOPLE HAPPY IN THIS ROOM, BUT I THINK THAT THE APPLICANT.

HAS DONE A GOOD JOB GOING THROUGH HERE AND TRYING TO PLAN SOMETHING THAT'S NOT 600 HOMES, IT'S 176.

NOW, LET ME POINT OUT SOMETHING ELSE TO YOU THAT WE PLEADED WITH BONNIE LANDRY ABOUT DURING THIS PROCESS WAS TO NOT TO CREATE MINIMUM DENSITIES ON PROPERTY.

MINIMUM DENSITIES MEAN YOU COULD HAVE 15 UNITS OF AN ACRE, FIVE UNITS AN ACRE, BUT THERE WOULD BE NO MINIMUM.

I MEAN, THEY DON'T HAVE TO PUT ANY HOUSES ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY.

THEY DON'T WANT TO. THEY SAID, OH, NO, NO, WE HAVE TO HAVE MINIMUM DENSITIES.

SO IF YOU LOOK AT THAT PLAN, YOU'LL SEE A BUNCH OF TOWNHOMES SQUEEZED ALL TOGETHER THERE.

THAT'S BECAUSE THE APPLICANT WAS NOT ALLOWED.

TO PUT LESS THAN A CERTAIN NUMBER OF HOMES ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT HAD THAT LAND USE ON IT.

LET ME POINT OUT SOMETHING ELSE THAT I FOUND EXTREMELY INTERESTING.

I SAID, BOY, YOU'VE GOT ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY WITH THREE DIFFERENT LAND USES ON IT.

HOW DO YOU KNOW WHERE THAT FLIES ON THAT PROPERTY, WHERE THERE ARE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS DESCRIBING THAT LAND USE ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY? TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT NEVER HAS BEEN TO MY KNOWLEDGE, AND THERE MAY BE NOW, BUT THERE WASN'T THEN GOING BACK TO THE PROCESS.

SO I JUST WANT I'VE BEEN HOLDING THIS IN FOR A LONG TIME.

I TRIED WITH EVERYTHING IN MY POWER TO TO.

UNFORTUNATELY. HERE'S ANOTHER THING THE LAW ONLY REQUIRES WHEN YOU REZONE MORE THAN TEN ACRES THAT YOU ADVERTISE IT IN THE PAPER TWICE.

THAT'S IT. EVERYBODY IN THIS TOWN SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED WITH A CERTIFIED LETTER SAYING THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING THIS REZONING.

I ASKED THAT OF OUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT THAT TIME, WHICH WAS BONNIE LANDRY, HOWARD BROWN AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

HAVE WE NOTICED THE PEOPLE IN INDIAN TOWN SO THEY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE HAVE NO CLUE ABOUT THESE THINGS.

THEY'RE COMPLICATED, THEY'RE COMPLICATED, CONFUSING.

AND THE PROCESS, WHEN YOU SHUT OUT THE PUBLIC FROM THE PROCESS, WHICH THEY DID WHEN THEY ELIMINATED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE, I KNEW SOMETHING WAS UP THEN.

SO WITH THAT SAID, I DON'T MEAN TO BE ANY MORE LONG WINDED ON THIS.

WE'LL GO BACK TO THE PROJECT.

UNDER MARTIN COUNTY, YOU COULD HAVE BUILT 200 AND WOULD YOU SAY 70 HOMES, 275 HOMES.

THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD 176.

LOOK, GUYS, I'M A NEIGHBOR TO THIS PROPERTY ON INDIAN TOWN MARINA.

I WOULD RATHER NOT HAVE THIS HAPPEN EITHER.

THERE IS BUNCH OF ZONING AROUND THE MARINA THAT I'D MUCH RATHER HAD NOT HAPPENED EITHER THAT I WASN'T AWARE OF.

BUT THINGS CHANGE.

AND THIS APPLICANT IS, BEST I CAN TELL, HAS MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE AND THEY HAVEN'T ABUSED IT.

AND THEY COULD HAVE.

AND HERE'S THE SITUATION, GUYS, WHICH WEIGHTED ALLUDED TO EARLIER.

YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE VESTED RIGHTS, YOU HAVE RIGHTS, AND YOU HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.

AND IF AN APPLICANT COMES IN AND THEY'VE MET EVERYTHING ON THAT CHECKLIST SAYS, I DID THIS, I DID THIS, I DID THIS.

IF THE TOWN COUNCIL SAYS NO, THEY HAVE LEGAL RECOURSE.

AND THIS HAS HAPPENED IN MARTIN COUNTY SEVERAL TIMES.

I'VE SEEN IT. MATTER OF FACT, THERE'S A HUGE LAWSUIT GOING ON RIGHT NOW WHERE A PROPERTY OWNER WAS DENIED.

AFTER FIVE, FIVE ATTEMPTS, THEY FINALLY FILED SUIT.

SO MY CONCERN IS THAT I'M NOT HAPPY THAT THIS HAPPENED TO ME, THE MOST BEAUTIFUL NEIGHBORHOOD IN INDIAN TOWN.

[02:10:02]

BUT IT'S INEVITABLE THAT THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN.

BUT I THINK YOU HAVE A RESPONSIBLE APPLICANT HERE WHO HAS ASSURED ME THAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO THE BEST THEY CAN.

NOW, LET ME LET ME SWITCH GEARS REAL QUICK.

THEY'RE GOING TO BE RENTAL PROPERTIES, WHICH NONE OF US ARE HAPPY WITH.

BUT THAT, UNFORTUNATELY, IS AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF WHAT WE CALL THE OPPORTUNITY ZONE.

THE OPPORTUNITY ZONES WERE CREATED TO BRING MONEY INTO A COMMUNITY THAT MAY BE BLIGHTED OR WHATEVER THEY WANT TO DO.

THEY WANT TO BRING INVESTMENT INTO THE COMMUNITY.

SO WHAT THEY DID, THEY SAID IF YOU HAD A COMPANY THAT YOU HAD A LARGE CAPITAL GAIN, YOU CAN TAKE THAT CAPITAL GAME AND REINVEST IT IN INTO A COMMUNITY AND YOU DON'T HAVE TO PAY A CAPITAL GAINS TAX ON IT.

THE TRICK WAS THAT YOU HAVE TO HOLD ON TO THAT ASSET FOR TEN YEARS.

NOW, THIS CLOCK STARTED THREE OR FOUR YEARS AGO, BUT YOU HAD TO HOLD ON TO THE ASSET.

SO IF I BOUGHT A BUILDING IN REHAB DEBT AND STUCK $1,000,000 INTO IT, I'D HAVE TO HOLD ON TO THAT BUILDING FOR TEN YEARS BEFORE I COULD SELL IT AND NOT PAY ANY TAX.

THAT'S THAT'S THE INCENTIVE.

SO I THINK AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF THIS OPPORTUNITY ZONE PROGRAM IS THAT A LOT OF COMPANIES SAID WE'RE GOING TO START BUILDING RESIDENTIAL, BUT UNFORTUNATELY THEY HAVE TO HOLD ON TO IT FOR TEN YEARS.

IN THIS CASE, I THINK IT'S MORE LIKE SEVEN OR EIGHT THAT'S LEFT ON THE CLOCK WHEN WHEN THE OPPORTUNITY ZONE STUFF WAS STARTED.

SO I TALKED TO MR. LIM AND I SAID, YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY'S REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS.

AND HIS I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR THE APPLICANT, BUT HE ASSURED ME THAT THEY WERE HIRING A VERY HIGHLY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY TO MANAGE THESE PROPERTIES. THEY'RE GOING TO VET THE RENTERS AND SO ON AND SO FORTH.

I ALSO SPOKE TO HIM ABOUT IS THERE A WAY TO DO A RENT TO OWN SITUATION WHERE SOMEONE COULD COME IN AND BUT THIS PROBABLY HAS TO DO WITH FEDERAL REGULATION AT SOME POINT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE OWNERSHIP OF A PROPERTY, EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY NOT HOLD TITLE, THERE WOULD BE A CLOSING AT SOME LATER DATE.

I DON'T KNOW. BUT I'VE TALKED TO MR. LEMON ABOUT THAT BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO BE THIS CONCERN IS GOING TO CONTINUE TO POP ITS HEAD UP HERE IN INDIANTOWN BECAUSE A LOT OF MONEY IS GOING TO BE COMING IN HERE FROM WITH OPPORTUNITY ZONE INVESTMENT.

SO I JUST WANTED TO EDUCATE EVERYBODY.

I APOLOGIZE. THESE AREN'T ALL QUESTIONS, BUT I WANTED TO TO LET YOU KNOW WHAT I KNOW.

AND I HOPE WE GET A CHANCE TO REVISIT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE NEED TO CORRECT.

AND YOU'VE HEARD ME TONIGHT, AND I'M SORRY THAT SOME OF YOU SEE A LITTLE ANGER IN MY VOICE AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT IS BECAUSE I AM SO UPSET ABOUT WHAT TOOK PLACE IN BOTH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESS AND THE LDR PROCESS.

BOTH OF THEM WERE A MESS.

IN THAT IN THAT UPSETS ME.

SO WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY NOW GOING FORWARD.

BUT I WANTED TO EDUCATE EVERYBODY TO WHAT TOOK PLACE.

BUT WHAT THIS DEVELOPER I BELIEVE IS DOING, WHICH IS THE RIGHT THING NOW, I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO SEE CHANGE.

I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT IN MY OPINION, HE'S DOING THE RIGHT THING BECAUSE HE'S BASICALLY MADE A MOOT POINT OF WHAT HAPPENED WITH ALLOWING ALL THAT DENSITY ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY. SO WITH THAT, I'LL HAND IT OVER.

THANK YOU. YOU HAD A QUESTION, A COMMENT.

NO. NO.

OKAY. MS..

MEMBER PRESSLER. SORRY.

OH, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.

ON PAGE 386.

I'M SURE. I MEAN, I KNOW THERE'S WETLANDS ON THIS PROPERTY.

I OFTEN PASS BY THERE.

THERE'S STANDING WATER ON FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD ALMOST ALL YEAR.

JANUARY IS THE DRIEST MONTH.

AND ANYWAY, THE QUESTION FOR PAGE 386 IS IT SAYS SOMETHING ABOUT ABOUT RETAINING, RETAINING WATER OR DRY BASINS ON THE PROPERTY TO MEET NUTRIENT LOAD REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO DISCHARGING TO ADJACENT LAKE AND WETLANDS.

I DIDN'T THINK YOU COULD DISCHARGE NUTRIENTS INTO WETLANDS OR LAKE.

PAGE 386 SORRY, I'M GOING TO DEFER THAT QUESTION TO IT'S NOT MY AREA OF EXPERTISE TO EITHER.

THE APPLICANT'S ENGINEER COULD CERTAINLY ANSWER THAT QUESTION, OR WE HAVE OUR UTILITIES ENGINEER PARTICIPATING REMOTELY WHO COULD ANSWER THAT QUESTION.

OKAY. WELL, RELATED TO THAT, THEY HAD A COMPANY GO IN AND DO SOIL SAMPLES AND THEY THEMSELVES ON PAGE FOUR, 1 TO 412, THEY MARK QUITE A FEW RED AREAS WHERE THEY WERE, LOCATIONS THAT WERE INACCESSIBLE DUE TO HEAVY VEGETATION. THERE'S THICK VEGETATION.

IT IS HEAVILY FORESTED.

GROUNDWATER WAS REACHED AT 3.7 FEET.

I BELIEVE, AS I UNDERSTAND IT IN OUR PACKET, I DIDN'T SEE A WETLAND SURVEY, BUT I DID SEE A TREE SURVEY WHICH I'D LIKE TO I GUESS ADDRESS THAT LATER.

BUT ANYWAY, I WANTED TO ASK YOU ABOUT THE THE WETLANDS AND THE NUTRIENTS BEING DISCHARGED INTO THE WETLAND.

[02:15:06]

TOM, ARE YOU.

YOU'RE ALIVE.

FOR PAT NOLAN.

I AM HERE. CAN HEAR.

YES. JEFF, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, SIR, WE CAN.

YEAH. SO WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO, BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE SOME OF THAT STUFF IN FRONT OF ME, BUT IF, IF SOMEONE FROM SIMMONS AND WHITE IS THERE CAN, CAN START ANSWERING THAT QUESTION AND I'LL FIND MY BACKUP THEY, THEY HAVE SOME BACKUP ON, ON ON HOW THEY'RE DOING THAT.

IF SOMEONE FROM SIMMONS RIGHT THERE.

YES, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

PLEASE STATE. YOUR NAME IS GREG BOLEN.

I'M A CIVIL ENGINEER WITH SIMMONS AND WHITE AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.

THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IS OUR WATER IS TREATED BEFORE IT EVER MAKES IT TO THE WETLAND.

WE PROVIDE FULL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT.

SO JUST SAID NUTRIENT LOAD REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO DISCHARGING INTO THE LAKE IN THE WETLANDS.

I MEAN, YOU'RE YOU'RE STILL DISCHARGING INTO WHATEVER WETLANDS THAT ARE CREATED, RIGHT? ULTIMATELY, YES, MA'AM. SOME OF THE WATER DOES MAKE IT TO THE WETLAND.

BUT AGAIN, IT'S PRETREATED BEFORE IT EVER MAKES IT TO THE WETLAND.

SO IN OTHER WORDS, THE RUNOFF WILL MAKE IT TO THE DRY DETENTION AREAS AND THE LAKES BEFORE IT EVER DISCHARGES INTO THE WETLAND.

DO YOU HAVE A WETLANDS SURVEY? YEAH, I BELIEVE WE COULD SPEAK TO THAT.

OF EXISTING WETLANDS.

YES. GOOD EVENING. FOR THE RECORD, ED WEINBERG WITH UW CONSULTANTS.

AND I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN ON FIGURE FIVE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT.

THAT'S PROVIDED SHOULD BE IN YOUR PACKAGE IS THE WETLAND MAP FOR THE ENTIRE PROPERTY.

APPROVED BY SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT.

WHAT CAN YOU JUST TELL ME? IS IT THE BUFFER? ABOUT THE BUFFER? HOW MUCH OF A BUFFER ARE YOU PROVIDING? IS IT THE STATE MINIMUM OF 25 FEET? THE STATE REGULATION IS A MINIMUM OF 15 AVERAGE, 25 FEET.

THAT'S WHAT WE'RE PROVIDING.

15 AVERAGE MINIMUM.

15. AVERAGE 25.

OKAY. MINIMUM 15.

AVERAGE 25.

CORRECT. AND ARE ANY OF THESE WETLANDS NATURAL OR WILL NONE OF THE WETLANDS BE PRESERVED? ALL OF THE WETLANDS ARE NATURAL AND ALL BUT TWO ACRES WILL BE PRESERVED.

THANK YOU. WE ARE HAVING A PUBLIC COMMENT.

MADAM CHAIR, IF IF THERE ISN'T ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS TO STAFF, I WOULD RECOMMEND TURNING IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT FOR THE APPLICANT TO PUT ON THEIR PRESENTATION.

ALL RIGHT. OH, WELL, WILL WE BE ABLE TO ASK MORE QUESTIONS A LITTLE LATER? YOU'LL BE ABLE TO ASK QUESTIONS OF THE APP.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OKAY.

SO THERE'S SOME MORE QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD.

WE'D LIKE TO TURN IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT.

THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR.

GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS NICHOLAS GEISSLER.

TOGETHER WITH MY PARTNER, JUDGE CYNTHIA ANGELOS, WE ARE ATTORNEYS WITH THE FIRM BARTLETT, LOEB, HINES AND THOMPSON, PLLC, AND WE'RE HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT RIVER OAK FERNWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC.

I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE THE REST OF OUR TEAM THAT'S HERE THIS EVENING.

WE HAVE TWO PRINCIPALS FROM FROM THE LLC, THE APPLICANT, JUDD LAIRD, AND ALSO HAROLD, JAMIE, RUSS, BRIDGE AND JAMIE WILL BE DOING THE BULK OF THE PRESENTATION. AFTER I GIVE MY INTRODUCTION.

HE WILL TAKE YOU THROUGH THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE SITE PLAN.

WE ALSO HAVE, AND I'LL DEFER TO.

YOU'VE HEARD IT THREE TIMES TONIGHT AND BEFORE THIS HEARING THAT.

OPINION TESTIMONY LAY OPINION TESTIMONY IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS EVIDENCE.

AND WE CERTAINLY CONCUR WITH THAT OPINION.

THAT'S THAT'S THE LAW IN FLORIDA.

THERE IS A SMALL EXCEPTION TO THAT.

AND CERTAINLY YOU CAN CONSULT WITH YOUR ATTORNEY AND ATTORNEY ATTORNEY VOS ON THIS.

BUT EXPERT EXPERT TESTIMONY, EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY IS ALLOWED TO BE CONSIDERED AS COMPETENT, SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE BY BY BY YOURSELVES TONIGHT.

AND TO THAT END, WE WILL BE HEARING TESTIMONY FROM A LAND PLANNING EXPERT, TODD MOREY, WHO HAS AN ABUNDANCE OF EXPERIENCE SITTING ON PLANNING BOARDS AND COUNTY COMMISSIONS AND REVIEWING APPLICATIONS AND SITE PLANS, JUST LIKE THE ONES YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR TONIGHT.

WE ALSO HAVE OUR TEAM OF CONSULTING EXPERTS.

YOU'VE ALREADY HEARD FROM A COUPLE OF THEM.

[02:20:02]

WE'D LIKE TO GET EVERYBODY HOME BEFORE CURFEW TONIGHT.

SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE THEM INDIVIDUALLY PRESENT, BUT THEY ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.

WE HAVE OUR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FROM BOWMAN, CHERYL CAMPBELL.

WE HAVE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, ED WEINBERG, WHO YOU'VE HEARD FROM, AND ALSO PETER ASUKA, WHO IS A LICENSED ARBORIST.

AND WE HAVE OUR ENGINEERS FROM SIMMONS AND WHITE RON ROSENBAUM, BRIAN KELLY AND GREG BOLEN.

SO BEFORE I TURN THE PRESENTATION OVER TO JAMIE, I WANTED TO POINT OUT THREE ASPECTS OF THIS SITE PLAN THAT WHEN I FIRST SAW, IT REALLY STUCK OUT TO ME.

THE FIRST ASPECT IS REALLY WHAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO SEE IN THE SITE PLAN OR THE APPLICATION, AND THAT'S YOU WILL NOT SEE ANY REQUESTS FOR COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS.

YOU WON'T SEE ANY REQUESTS FOR REZONINGS, YOU WON'T SEE ANY REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES.

YOU WON'T SEE, FRANKLY, A REQUEST FOR ANY RELIEF FROM THE COMP PLAN OR THE CODE AS A AS IT WAS DESIGNED.

AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS VERY SIMPLE.

ALTHOUGH WE'VE HEARD THERE WERE COMPLICATIONS WITH THE DRAFTING AND ENACTMENT OF THE TOWNS COMP PLAN, IT WAS IMPORTANT FOR US THAT THIS PROJECT, WHICH WAS DESIGNED SHORTLY AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF YOUR OF YOUR COMP PLAN, DOESN'T SEEK THESE KINDS OF THINGS.

CERTAINLY THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH SEEKING FOR FOR A VARIANCE OR FOR A REZONING.

AND IN FACT THOSE PROCEDURES ARE WRITTEN RIGHT INTO YOUR CODE.

BUT WE WANTED THIS PROJECT TO BE A MODEL FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THIS TOWN.

WE CONSIDER WE CONSIDER THIS TO BE THE FIRST OF A GROWING TOWN, AND WE WANT IT TO BUILD A HIGH END COMMUNITY THAT FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS COULD LOOK AT AS AN EXAMPLE.

SO TO THAT END, WE WANTED THIS DEVELOPMENT TO 100% ACCURATELY BE IN LINE WITH THE VISION OF THE TOWN.

SO WE SPECIFICALLY DID NOT DESIGN IT WITH THE NEED TO REQUEST ANY RELIEF FROM YOUR CODE.

THE SECOND THING THAT STUCK OUT TO ME IS THE ARTISTIC DESIGN OF THIS SITE PLAN.

THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO BE A PLACE WHERE THE RESIDENTS OF INDIANTOWN, THE FIREFIGHTERS, THE POLICEMEN, THE THE THE PROFESSIONAL WORKERS CAN GO HOME AT NIGHT AFTER A DAY'S WORK AND NOT JUST LAY THEIR HEAD DOWN.

AND IN ONE OF MANY IN A ROW OF BOXES PACKED INTO A SITE.

WE WANTED THIS TO BE A COMMUNITY WHERE FAMILIES CAN BE RAISED.

PICTURES CAN BE TAKEN IN FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE AND SENT OUT AS CHRISTMAS CARDS.

WE WANTED PEOPLE TO FAMILIES TO BE ABLE TO INVITE EXTENDED FAMILY AND FRIENDS OVER TO ENJOY THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND HOPEFULLY SPEND SOME MONEY IN THE TOWN WHILE THEY'RE HERE.

THE THIRD THING THAT STICKS OUT IN THIS SITE PLAN IS THE OPEN SPACE.

AS MR. WATSON FILLED FILLED EVERYBODY IN ON TONIGHT, WE ARE ALLOWED TO BUILD 640 HOMES, 640 UNITS IN THIS SITE.

TYPICALLY, WHEN A DEVELOPER, A PROPERTY OWNER, DECIDES TO TO START CONCEPTUALLY BUILDING A SITE PLAN, THE FIRST THING THEY'LL DO IS LOOK AT THE REGULATIONS, LOOK AT WHAT THE MAXIMUM DENSITY IS IN A SITE, AND THEN IMMEDIATELY INSTRUCT EVERYONE WHO'S WORKING ON IT TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO BUILD AS MANY UNITS AS POSSIBLE TO MEET THAT MAXIMUM.

THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE.

WE'RE NOT. THE NUMBER IS 640 UNITS.

WE COULD BUILD 640 HOMES ON THIS SITE.

WE'RE NOT SEEKING ANYTHING CLOSE TO THAT.

WE'RE NOT SEEKING 90% OF THAT.

80% OF THAT.

NOT EVEN HALF OF THAT.

ALL WE'RE SEEKING IS ACTUALLY LESS THAN 30% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY ON THIS SITE.

AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S VERY RARE FOR AN APPLICATION SUCH OF THIS.

AND THE REASON IS BECAUSE WE WANT THIS TO BE SOMETHING THAT THE TOWN CAN BE PROUD OF, SOMETHING THAT THE RESIDENTS CAN BE PROUD OF.

AND TO THAT END, MR. MCADAMS, MR. KATIMS MENTIONED THE ELEVATIONS AND THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS THAT WE'RE NOT OBLIGATED TO TO SUBMIT THOSE TONIGHT.

BUT WHAT YOU WILL SEE TONIGHT ARE VERY CLOSE RENDERINGS TO WHAT THE FINAL PRODUCT WILL LOOK LIKE FOR THE HOMES IN THIS COMMUNITY.

WE CAN'T GIVE 100% WHAT WHAT THE HOMES ARE GOING TO LOOK LIKE BECAUSE MATERIALS MIGHT NOT BE MIGHT NOT BE AVAILABLE BY THE TIME WE FINALLY BUILD.

BUT YOU WILL SEE WHAT THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS ARE.

AND WE HOPE THAT AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PRESENTATION, YOU GUYS WILL BE AS PROUD AS I AM TO BE A PART OF THIS PROJECT.

AND WE THINK YOU WILL BE COMPELLED TO RECOMMEND A VOTE OF APPROVAL FOR THIS SITE PLAN.

SO WITH THAT, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO JAMIE, WHO WILL GO THROUGH THE SPECIFICS OF THE SITE PLAN.

THANK YOU.

[02:25:07]

GOOD EVENING. BOTTOM BUTTON.

I CAN WORK THE CONTROLLER.

THAT'S A GOOD THING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALLOWING US TO PRESENT OUR PROJECT AND ALL THE TIME AND EFFORT THAT YOU HAVE SPENT REVIEWING IN PREPARATION FOR TONIGHT. I'M JAMIE RUSBRIDGER.

I'M A PRINCIPAL IN THE PROJECT, BUT I'M ALSO A LOCAL BUSINESS OWNER IN MARTIN COUNTY.

WE'VE BEEN LOCATED ABOUT NINE MILES AWAY FROM THE SITE IN THE VILLAGE OF NEWTOWN.

AND OVER THE PAST 15 YEARS, WE'VE BEEN PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES WITHIN THE VILLAGE AT NYNGAN.

I'VE WORKED WITH STAFF AND I WANT TO THANK THEM VERY MUCH FOR THEIR HELP AND THEIR COLLABORATION WITH US TO PROPOSE THIS UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE VILLAGE IN NEWTOWN.

AND THAT DEVELOPMENT IS RIVER OAK.

SO HERE'S OUR PROJECT LOCATION.

NOW JEFF HIT IT ON ON AN EARLIER WHEN HE GAVE HIS PRESENTATION THE SLIDES IN THIS PRESENTATION NORTH IS TO THE RIGHT.

THE REASON WE DID THAT IN ALL THE SUBMITTALS WE DID TO THE VILLAGE IN NEWTOWN, ALL OF OUR PLANS ARE SHOWING SHOWING NORTH TO THE RIGHT.

SO THE SLIDES THAT I'M PRESENTING, JUST BE AWARE, RIGHT IS NORTH THE SAINT LUCIE CANAL TO THE SOUTH OF OUR PROPERTY.

WE HAVE WATERFRONT AND WE ARE ADJACENT TO THE INDIAN TOWN MARINA.

THE PROJECT IS LOCATED BETWEEN SOUTHWEST AVENUE AND SOUTHWEST FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD.

WE ARE JUST SOUTH OF THE CSX RAILROAD TRACKS.

AND THEN. THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT NOW AT VILLAGE HALL.

SO IF YOU GO DOWN SOUTH, THAT'S WHERE OUR PROPOSED PROJECT IS.

SO HERE'S A. AN ENHANCED VERSION OF AN ENHANCED VIEWING OF OUR PROJECT WITH THE VICINITY.

AGAIN, NORTH IS TO THE RIGHT.

ST LUCIE CANALS TO THE SOUTH.

THE INDIAN TOWN MARINA IS TO THE SOUTHWEST, WHERE BETWEEN SOUTHWEST LEV SOUTHWEST PERMANENT FOREST.

AND WE'RE JUST SOUTH OF WARFIELD BOULEVARD, WHICH GOES DIRECTLY THROUGH THE VILLAGE INDIAN TOWN.

SO THIS IS OUR PROJECT SITE SHOWING THE FUTURE LAND USE.

AND AS EVERYONE'S BEEN TALKING ABOUT, WE HAVE THREE DIFFERENT FUTURE LAND USES FOR THIS PROJECT.

ON THE NORTH WE HAVE THE VILLAGE CORE MIXED USE ON THE WEST SIDE.

ALONG FROM ALL WE HAVE THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL, AND THEN ON THE EAST SIDE WE HAVE THE SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL.

IT'S IMPORTANT TO POINT OUT THAT WE'RE NOT PROPOSING ANY CHANGES TO THE SITE EXISTING LAND USE.

THESE ARE THE CURRENT DESIGNATIONS.

WE'RE PROPOSING A FAMILY FRIENDLY COMMUNITY WITH A MODEL FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE VILLAGE ENDING TOWN.

SO HERE'S OUR PROJECT SITE WITH A ZONING OVERLAY.

AGAIN, THREE DIFFERENT ZONING.

THREE DIFFERENT ZONING LAWS ON THIS PROPERTY VILLAGE MIXED USES TO THE NORTH.

NEIGHBORHOOD AND MIXED USE IS TO THE WEST ALONG FORMAL AND LIMITED RESIDENTIAL ALONG SOUTHWEST FERNWOOD FOREST.

AGAIN, IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT ALL THESE EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS AND WE'RE NOT PROPOSING CHANGES TO ANY OF THE LAND USE OR THE ZONING.

WE'VE DESIGNED THIS PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN.

WE HAVE STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODES, WITH OUR PROPOSED PLANS, AND WE'VE DESIGNED IT TO MEET THE MASTER PLAN GOALS OF THE VILLAGE INDIAN TOWN.

SO HERE'S OUR SITE WITH THE.

THE THE DENSITY REQUIREMENT OR THE DENSITY ALLOWANCES OVERLAID ON IT.

EACH DIFFERENT ZONING AREA HAS DIFFERENT MINIMUM MAXIMUMS. THIS. WE'VE DESIGNED THIS PROJECT TO BE WITHIN THE MAXIMUM AND THE MINIMUM.

THE EXISTING LAND USES FOR ALL FOR THE PROJECT WILL ALLOW 640 UNITS AND WE'RE ONLY PROPOSING 176 UNITS.

WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING IS LESS THAN 30% OF THE ALLOWABLE UNITS.

NOW WE GET TO THE FUN STUFF. HERE'S THE SITE.

SITES 55.2 ACRES.

NOW, LET ME WALK YOU THROUGH THE SITE PLAN.

[02:30:02]

SO HERE'S OUR ROAD PROPOSED ROAD WIDE PROPOSED ROADWAY FOR THE PROJECT.

WE'VE DESIGNED A CLEAN, EFFICIENT ROADWAY DESIGN WITH IN MIND FOR SAFETY, FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS.

AND WE PREPARED OUR DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY.

THAT DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY HAS MET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT.

NOW WE HAVE AN ENTRANCE FOR THE VILLAGE MIXED USE, WHICH IS THE NORTH, THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS TO THE RIGHT, COMING IN OFF A SOUTHWEST MILL.

WE HAVE AN ENTRANCE AND EXIT ALONG FORMAL.

WE HAVE AN ENTRANCE OFF OF SOUTHWEST OAK STREET.

AND THEN WE HAVE AN ENTRANCE OFF OF SOUTHWEST PALM DRIVE.

SO HERE'S OUR SITE NOW OVERLAID WITH THE SIDEWALKS.

HOW WE DESIGNED THE SIDEWALKS TO HAVE COVERAGE THROUGHOUT THE SITE.

WITH AN ARTISTIC DESIGN YOU CAN TRAVERSE FROM THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE VILLAGE.

MIXED USE GO THROUGH THE CENTER OF THE PROJECT AND END UP WALKING ALL THE WAY TO THE SOUTH, TO THE ST LUCIE RIVER.

SO HERE ARE THE HOME SITES ON THE PROPOSED SITE.

WE HAVE 176 HOME SITES.

THERE'S GOING TO BE A VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS WITH THE INTENT OF CREATING THE FAMILY ATMOSPHERE.

OKAY. NOW WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE SITE FEATURE THAT WE'RE GOING TO WALK THROUGH THE SITE FEATURES OF THE PROJECT.

FIRST IS GOING TO BE THE LAKES.

WE'RE PROPOSING TWO LAKES ON THE ENTRANCE ALONG SOUTHWEST FAMILY.

HERE'S THE DRY DETENTION.

THE DRY DETENTION IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTER OF THE SITE AND WILL BE USED FOR WATER QUALITY AND CLEANSING FOR THE SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.

HERE'S THE PRESERVED AREAS.

THE WHAT? THE PRESERVED AREAS.

THE PRESERVES AREAS ARE INCORPORATED IN SITE TO MAXIMIZE THE OPEN SPACE FOR THE PROJECT.

WE PERFORMED A COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY SO WE COULD INCORPORATE THE HIGHEST AREAS OF PRESERVATION WITHIN THE PROJECT.

THERE'S 42% OF THE SITE IS DEDICATED TO OPEN SPACE.

42% WILL BE OPEN SPACE FOR THE PROJECT.

SO HERE'S THE SITE WITH THE SPECIMEN OAK TREES THAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED.

THE SPECIMEN OAK TREES WERE IN THE DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT AND WE'RE PROPOSING TO PRESERVE AND RELOCATE THESE TREES WITHIN THE PROJECT.

PLUS, WE'RE GOING TO PRESERVE OVER 1000 TREES ON THE EXISTING SITE.

SO THAT'S WHERE THEY ARE ON THE SITE.

EXISTING. HERE'S WHERE WE PROPOSE TO RELOCATE THEM.

SO ON TOP OF PRESERVING THE EXISTING SPECIMEN TREES AND THE 1000 TREES ON SITE, WE PREPARED A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT WILL HAVE STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES AND WITHIN THE THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAYS.

ON TOP OF THE PRESERVING AND RELOCATING OF THE SPECIMEN OAKS AND THE 1000 TREES IN THE PRESERVE AREA.

SO WE'VE INCLUDED A SLIDE WITH A CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURAL.

WE'RE PROPOSING 3 TO 4 BEDROOM OPTIONS WITH SOME HIGH END FINISHES.

AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PART OF THE PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION.

YOU'RE GOOD. THANK YOU.

UM, BOARD MEMBER SINGER? YES, SIR. I'D LIKE TO ASK A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.

SURE. WHAT IS THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE YOU'LL BE BUILDING? THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE HOUSES.

I BELIEVE IN THE CODE.

THERE'S GOING TO BE A MINIMUM, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT WHAT WE HAVE.

GIVE ME A ROUGH GUESSTIMATE.

AGAIN, I DON'T I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT.

OKAY. YOU SAID THREE OR FOUR BEDROOMS. SO WERE YOU THINKING 1800 TO 20, 200 SQUARE FEET WOULD BE 3 TO 4 BEDROOMS? SURE. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BUILD 900 FOOT SQUARE FOOT HOMES? NO, NOT ON THE SITE.

THE THE LOT SIZES ARE LARGE.

SO THEY'RE PROBABLY GOING TO BE IN THAT IN THAT RANGE.

WOULD YOU CONSIDER OR COULD YOU CONSIDER, SINCE THEY'RE RENTAL PROPERTIES, MAKING THE VILLAGE MIXED USE SECTION? A 55 OR OLDER TO MITIGATE.

[02:35:03]

THE OVERCROWDING OF THE SCHOOL, WHICH IS ALREADY.

NOT SERVICING THE COMMUNITY WELL.

I WOULD HAVE TO DISCUSS IT WITH OTHER PRINCIPALS.

I COULDN'T MAKE THAT DECISION.

SO IT'S 44 UNITS, BASICALLY.

IT HAS ITS FRONT ENTRANCE.

IT'S ACTUALLY SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE 62 UNITS.

62, BECAUSE THAT'S THE MINIMUM 62 UNITS.

YES. WELL, THAT WAS JUST A THOUGHT.

IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT YOU JUST THOUGHT.

I'M THINKING, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE OUR SCHOOL WAS A LITTLE OVERBURDENED.

AND THEN I HAD ONE MORE QUESTION FOR YOU.

EARLIER, I HAD ASKED IF THERE WOULD BE ANY LAND RENTAL.

I KNOW THESE ARE GOING TO BE RENTALS OR ARE YOU GOING TO BE DOING ANY KIND OF MOBILES OR ANY KIND OF RENTAL SITUATION? NO, THE THE DESIGNATED USE IS ALL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

SO IT'S ALL GOING TO BE THERE'S NO MOBILE HOMES ALLOWED, ALL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

BUT YOU ALSO HAVE IN SOME OTHER PARTS OF IT, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE MULTIPLES, MAYBE DUPLEXES OR.

YES, THE CODE ALLOWS DUPLEXES, TOWNHOMES, BUT SO YOU'RE PLANNING CONCEPT OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

PERFECT. AND WERE YOU PLANNING ON ANY COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS OTHER THAN WHAT THE THE VILLAGE REQUIRES? THERE'S A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PROPOSED FOR IT FOR THE SITE, BUT I COULDN'T SPEAK INTO THE DETAILS OF THE HOA.

THANK YOU, SIR. THANK YOU, OK PRESSLER.

I HAVE LOTS OF QUESTIONS.

I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHERE TO START.

I REALIZE THAT OUR CODE HAS VERY LOW REQUIREMENTS.

IT JUST DOES.

THAT'S BEEN THE WORK OF SOME PEOPLE FOR QUITE A WHILE.

TO HAVE THE MINIMUM EFFECT TO HAVE LESS THAN MARTIN COUNTY.

THE SIDEWALKS ARE VERY NARROW.

I UNDERSTAND.

IF. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, ARE THEY FOUR FEET? I BELIEVE THE SIDEWALKS ON THE SIDE ARE FOUR FOOT, NOT SIX.

AND IF YOU COULD I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN BACK UP IN YOUR POWERPOINT, BUT THE ADJOINING NEIGHBORHOOD IS HALF ACRE LOTS.

RIGHT HERE. JUST ONE OF THE DRAWINGS, I THINK WITH WITHOUT THE VEGETATION TO UNDERSTAND FOR.

WELL, THAT'S ANOTHER ISSUE.

THE TREES, HOW SMALL THE LOTS ARE, HOW DENSE IT IS, HOW SMALL.

DO YOU HAVE JUST A DRAWING WITHOUT THE VEGETATION? I BELIEVE I DO. I'M JUST TRYING TO GET.

THAT WOULD BE THE HOME SITES. NO.

WELL, ANYWAY, YOU CAN SEE FOR THE PUBLIC, YOU CAN SEE LOTS THERE OF THE ADJOINING EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH THOSE HOUSES, MOST OF THEM ARE ABOUT HALF ACRE.

SO IT'S VERY, VERY DENSE AND THE LOTS ARE VERY SMALL.

THE SIDEWALKS ARE VERY SMALL.

I'D LIKE TO GO TO THE TREES.

THE 19 SPECIMEN TREES.

ARE THERE AND I DON'T THINK SO.

I MEAN, I THINK ACCORDING TO THE PAPERWORK THAT WE HAVE, IT SAYS THAT ALL OF THEM WILL BE MOVED.

SO THERE ARE NONE THAT WILL BE LEFT IN PLACE, ALL OF THEM.

AND WHAT IS THE CHANCES OF A SPECIMEN TREE? WHICH MEANS I THINK THE DIAMETER OF THE TRUNK OR STRAIGHT ACROSS IS 12 INCHES, THREE FEET OFF THE GROUND, SOMETHING LIKE THAT OF A TREE BEING MOVED.

WHAT ARE THE CHANCES, I THINK, OF SOMETHING LIKE THAT BEING MOVED OR VERY LOW FOR THAT TREE TO SURVIVE? I'M GOING TO.

GOOD. AND SO WE HAVE OUR CERTIFIED ARBORIST HERE WHO CAN GIVE DETAILED INFORMATION.

BUT IN SHORT, WE IDENTIFIED THE A EXTENSIVE STUDY WAS DONE AND THEY IDENTIFIED THE TREES THAT WERE APPROPRIATE FOR SURVIVAL OF RELOCATION.

SO THERE ARE CERTAIN TREES THAT MAY LOOK GOOD TO A LAYMAN'S EYES SAY, HEY, THAT'S THAT'S A GOOD, HEALTHY TREE.

BUT SOMEBODY WHO SPECIALIZES THIS CAN SAY NO, THAT ONE WON'T SURVIVE.

IT'S IT'S OLD.

IT MIGHT DIE OR IT MIGHT HAVE SOME SORT OF DISEASE THAT WILL NOT SURVIVE MOVEMENT.

SO THAT'S WHY THESE 19, THESE 17 TREES WERE WHICH MOST OF THEM END UP IN THE CIRCULAR AREA.

RIGHT. YEAH.

WE HAVE THE MAP.

STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

[02:40:03]

YES, THE SPECIMEN TREES KIND OF THE BEST THAT THERE IS ON THE PROPERTY.

THERE'S NOT A SINGLE ONE THAT WILL STAY WHERE THEY ARE, ALL OF THEM.

I BELIEVE TWO ARE GOING.

SO THERE'S 19 TREES IN TOTAL.

TWO ARE GOING TO REMAIN WHERE THEY ARE AND 17 WILL BE MOVED.

AND THE PURPOSE OF MOVING THEM IS SO THEY CAN BE PRESERVED.

WELL, WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF SURVIVAL, THOUGH, AS MY UNDERSTANDING IS, IT'S VERY LOW.

NO, IT'S VERY. AND THAT'S WHY THESE WERE IDENTIFIED AS BEING APPROPRIATE FOR MOVING, BECAUSE THEY THEY WILL HAVE A VERY HIGH CHANCE OF SURVIVING THE RELOCATION.

ON PAGE 731, IT SAYS AND THIS IS FROM YOUR OWN REPORT ON THE SPECIMEN TREES, THAT OF THE 19 TREES THAT THEY WERE RECOMMENDING, OR THAT THESE TREES SHOULD BE CONSIDERATE, CONSIDERED OF PRESERVATION IN PLACE.

SO WHAT CONSIDERATION ARE THEY GETTING? I DON'T SEE THAT THEY'RE GETTING ANY CONSIDERATION FOR PRESERVATION IN PLACE IF THEY'RE ALL BUT TWO GOING TO BE MOVED.

WELL, HAVE OUR ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS.

WHILE I'M UP HERE, I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS ONE ONE QUESTION.

THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT ABOUT THE 55 AND OLDER FOR SCHOOL CAPACITY, AND IT'S IN YOUR SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION.

THERE WAS A LETTER FROM MARTIN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD THAT DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY HAVE ADEQUATE CAPACITY FOR FOR THE RESIDENTS.

THANK YOU. AGAIN.

FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS ED WEINBERG WITH VW CONSULTANTS.

WE ARE THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS ON THE PROJECT.

I HAVE BEEN SWORN AND I HAVE A BACHELOR'S DEGREE IN BIOLOGY, A MASTER'S DEGREE IN OCEANOGRAPHY, AND ABOUT 35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT IN THIS AREA. TO GET TO YOUR QUESTION, WE UNDERTOOK A TWO PHASE PROCESS WITH REGARD TO THOSE SPECIFIC TREES ON THE SITE AND REALLY THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF TREES.

THE FIRST PHASE BEFORE ANY SITE PLANS WERE DONE, BEFORE ANY IDEAS WERE DEVELOPED WAS OUR ARBORIST AND PETE'S BACK IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM.

SURVEYED THE ENTIRE SITE, IDENTIFIED A GROUP SOMEWHERE AROUND 30 TREES THAT HAD SOME FEATURE OR ANOTHER THAT YOU COULD USE AT ONE POINT USE THE TERM MAJESTIC, BUT, YOU KNOW, VERY HIGH QUALITY, HIGH ESTHETIC VALUE TREES.

AND OF THOSE 30, THESE 19 WERE IDENTIFIED AS HAVING THE HIGHEST LIKELIHOOD OF EITHER SURVIVAL PRESERVED IN PLACE OR RELOCATED WITHIN THE SITE BASED ON ANYTHING FROM WHETHER THERE WERE SPLITS IN THE TRUNK OR NOT, AND A NUMBER OF OTHER FEATURES.

SO THE THING TO UNDERSTAND, AND IT WAS MENTIONED BEFORE, IS THAT IN ORDER TO DEVELOP AND MOVE THE SITE OUT OF THE FLOODPLAIN, THERE'S 2 TO 3, FOUR FEET OF FILL THAT HAS TO GO ON THE SITE. AND SO WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE.

THE TWO LOCATIONS WHERE TREES WILL BE LEFT IN PLACE, IT'S NECESSARY TO MOVE THEM SO THAT WE'RE NOT COVERED AND KILLING THE TREE IF IT WAS LESS LEFT IN PLACE.

AND SO WE EXPECT TO ENHANCE THE SURVIVAL OPPORTUNITY OF EACH OF THE TREES WE MOVE RATHER THAN WHAT MAY HAPPEN TO IT IF IT WAS LEFT IN PLACE.

WELL, YES, THERE ARE LARGE PARTS OF THIS LAND THAT ARE LOW.

I THINK THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS THAT THE VEGETATION IS SO DENSE.

WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IF YOU BRING IN PHIL TO RAISE THIS PROPERTY TO THREE AND FOUR FEET TO EXISTING HOMES? I AM NOT THE QUALIFIED EXPERT TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION.

THANK YOU. GREG BOLAN WITH SIMMONS AND WHITE BEANS.

SURE. I HAVE A BACHELORS OF SCIENCE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING AND I'VE BEEN WORKING HERE IN SOUTH FLORIDA FOR 26 YEARS AS A CIVIL ENGINEER.

THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION ABOUT WHAT FILLING.

I WANT TO BACKTRACK FOR A MOMENT.

THE FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS TODAY DO HAVE QUITE A BIT TO DO WITH WHY WE'RE FILLING.

BUT THE MAIN DRIVER OF THE AMOUNT OF FILL THAT WE'RE BRINGING INTO THIS SITE WERE THE WETLANDS.

OUR CLIENT HAD A STRONG DESIRE TO PRESERVE THOSE WETLANDS IN AN EFFORT TO PRESERVE THEM.

WE CAN'T KEEP OUR LAKES LOW BECAUSE THAT WATER WILL PULL THE THE WATER DOWN IN THE WETLANDS AND THE WETLANDS WILL DIE.

WHAT WE'VE DONE, WE'VE ADDRESSED PERIMETER GRADING AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE.

WE'VE BEEN THROUGH SEVERAL ROUNDS WITH SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, AND WE'VE WE'VE ADDRESSED PERIMETER DRAINAGE.

SO THERE ARE NO ANTICIPATED ISSUES.

HOW HAVE YOU ADDRESSED PERIMETER? PERIMETER DRAINAGE? WE'VE LOOKED AT THE HISTORICAL TOPO AND THE WAY THINGS FLOW TODAY, AND WE HAVE NOT INTERRUPTED THAT FLOW.

WELL, I MEAN, THE LAND ALONG SOUTHWEST FERNWOOD FOREST IS FROM ALMOST ALL YEARS STANDING WATER.

[02:45:01]

YEAH, IT'S IT'S VERY LOW.

I AGREE WITH YOU. YES.

SO WHERE IS THAT WATER GOING TO GO? THE SAME PLACE IT GOES TODAY.

IT'S NOT WITHIN OUR PROPERTY.

THEREFORE, WE'RE NOT ADDRESSING IT.

BUT IT'S A LOW LYING AREA THAT WE'RE NOT IMPACTING.

SO WE'VE DONE WE DO PRE DEVELOPMENT MODELS THAT SHOW WHAT HAPPENS TODAY.

AND THEN WE DO POST DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT MODELS THAT SHOW WHAT HAPPENS AFTER WE DEVELOP.

WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT'S NOT WITHIN YOUR PROPERTY? IT'S NOT PHYSICALLY WITHIN OUR PROPERTY.

SO WE'RE GOING TO GO ON MY PROPERTY AND THEIR PROPERTY AND THEIR PROPERTY THAT'S IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO DEAL WITH IT. SO WHAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO DO IS ESSENTIALLY BUILD A PERIMETER AROUND OUR SITE AND ADDRESS OUR NOT ONLY OUR DRAINAGE, BUT ADDRESS HISTORICAL DRAINAGE SO THAT WE'RE NOT INCREASING ANY PROBLEMS THAT EXIST TODAY.

ESSENTIALLY, WE HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE SAME LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT EXISTS TODAY.

OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

MEMBER OF SINGER.

YEAH. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT SOMETHING THAT I REMEMBER HEARING AT THE BEGINNING THAT YOU VOLUNTARILY WERE GOING TO MOVE TO THE 19 DEGREES.

YOU'RE NOT REQUIRED TO DO THAT.

IS THAT IS THAT CORRECT? NOT THE EXPERT ON THAT, BUT THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING.

YEAH, I'M GOING TO GET THAT.

I WANT TO. MY NAME IS CYNTHIA.

ANGELA. I'M PART OF THE TEAM, SO I APOLOGIZE.

BUT I THINK THAT WOULD BE A CORRECT QUESTION FOR STAFF.

I WAS GOING TO ASK THAT.

OR IF YOU WEREN'T, I DON'T MIND WHO ANSWERS IT.

I JUST WANT WE CAN AND I HEAR CORRECTLY THAT THEY WERE THAT THEY VOLUNTARILY DECIDED TO MOVE THOSE SPECIMENS. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE APPLICATION PACKAGE AND ACCORDING TO THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, ALL 19 OF THOSE SPECIMEN OAK TREES ARE WITHIN THE AREA TO BE CLEARED, GRADED AND DEVELOPED AT FILLED AND WOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO PRESERVATION AND WOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO MITIGATION SHOULD THEY BE REMOVED.

SO WHAT I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE SAYING IS THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS CHOSEN TO PRESERVE THOSE TREES BUT IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DO SO.

IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

THANK YOU. I GOT A QUESTION TO THE APPLICANT.

A QUESTION WAS ASKED BY A MEMBER OF.

OLD SINGER ABOUT SUBSIDIZED HOUSING.

HOUSING FOR RENT.

I'D LIKE TO KNOW, HOW WOULD YOU? ARE YOU ALL GOING TO ADDRESS SUBSIDIZED HOUSING FOR THOSE RESIDENTS THAT NEED HOUSING? HAVE YOU BEEN SWORN IN? NO, I HAVEN'T.

JUDD LAIRD, ONE OF THE OWNERS, AND I HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN IN.

THEY HAVE TO BE SWORN IN.

RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, PLEASE.

IT WOULD BE BEST IF HE WERE.

YEAH. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION YOU ARE ABOUT TO GIVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE? YES. THE WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE HERE IS SENSIBLY PRICED RENTALS, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, SOME TOWNHOUSES, SOME ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY VILLAS.

THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE TAX CREDIT OR A SUBSIDIZED HOUSING.

YOU KNOW, WHERE WE WORK WITH THE GOVERNMENT AGENCY, NOT NOT IN THIS NOT IN THIS PARTICULAR PHASE.

BUT WE DO HAVE FUTURE PHASES THAT WE'RE BUYING ALSO.

BUT THEY THE.

WHAT WE WE REALIZE THAT WE HAVE TO CREATE A PRODUCT THAT IS ATTRACTIVE FOR PEOPLE TO WHO WANT TO COME TO INDIAN TOWN, MAYBE FROM NORTHERN PALM BEACH COUNTY OR OTHER PARTS OF MARTIN COUNTY.

BUT WE ALSO WANT TO WE ALSO NEED TO ATTRACT PEOPLE WHO LIVE HERE IN INDIAN TOWN AND MAKE IT REASONABLE.

SO IT'S GOING TO BE SENSIBLY PRICED.

BUT WHEN YOU WHEN YOU IF IT'S WE'RE NOT APPLYING FOR ANY KIND OF GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY OR TAX CREDIT TO FOR SUBSIDIES, BUT WE UNDERSTAND THAT WE OWN THOUSANDS OF WE ALREADY OWN THOUSANDS OF RENTAL UNITS HERE IN FLORIDA.

AND SO WE KNOW THAT YOU HAVE TO YOU HAVE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF OF THE OF THE LOCAL MARKET.

WELL, OKAY. WITH THAT BEING SAID, TWO QUESTIONS.

THE YOUNG MAN DID NOT KNOW HOW HOW BIG THE UNITS WERE GOING TO BE.

AND THEN.

THE CAUSE, YOU SAID.

WHAT? WHAT? WHAT'S A BASE FOR? FOR PURCHASING OR RENTING.

OKAY, SO THE THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ARE GOING TO START AT ABOUT A LITTLE OVER 1600 SQUARE FEET.

THOSE ARE THREE BEDROOM HOMES.

[02:50:02]

WE'LL ALL HAVE TWO CAR GARAGES.

THE SOME OF THE LARGER HOMES, WHICH WILL BE FOUR BEDROOM HOUSES, WILL GO UP TO 2400 SQUARE FEET.

THE WAY WE'VE UNDERWRITTEN IT RIGHT NOW, BASED ON CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND LAND COSTS, WE ARE TRYING TO HAVE THESE ARE BRAND NEW HOMES AND WE'RE GOING TO TRY AND HAVE THEM START AT $900 A MONTH.

SO THERE'S NO OWNERSHIP, JUST RENTALS OR RENTALS BECAUSE IT IS AN OPPORTUNITY ZONE.

AND IT WAS TOUCHED ON EARLIER AND IT'S WHAT WE'RE HEARING TODAY.

WE'RE HERE TO GET THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THESE HOUSES.

WE MIGHT IN THE FUTURE, WE MAY OR MAY NOT SELL THEM, BUT INITIALLY THEY'RE GOING TO BE OPERATED AS A PROFESSIONAL.

IT'S BEING PROFESSIONALLY RUN RENTALS AND AND MANAGED BY A NATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY THAT WORKS FOR US.

SO BOARD MEMBER WATSON HAD HAD BROUGHT OUR ATTENTION TO SOMETHING.

YOU HAVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF HOUSING IN ONE AREA.

HOW IS THAT GOING TO WORK? WELL, THE THE HOUSES, THE LOTS ARE DIFFERENT SIZES, BUT THE HOUSES CAN BE YOU KNOW, YOU CAN BE THE HOUSES CAN BE THE SAME. YOU CAN HAVE A IT DOESN'T SAY YOU CAN'T HAVE A 1600 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE.

AND, YOU KNOW, I KNOW THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT ZONING OVERLAYS, BUT THE HOUSES ARE GOING TO BE SIMILARLY SIZED.

AND THEN IN WHERE THEY HAVE TO BE ATTACHED, THEY'LL BE A LITTLE SMALLER.

YOU KNOW, THERE WILL BE A SMALLER OPTION AND WILL BE MORE AFFORDABLE.

BUT THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL BE 3 TO 4 BEDROOMS. AND THEY WILL AND THEY'LL HAVE THEY'LL HAVE DIFFERENT OPTIONS AND DIFFERENT.

BUT YOU WON'T WHEN FOR THE PURPOSES HERE TONIGHT, WE'RE SHOWING YOU HOW WE HOW WE'RE TRYING TO COMPLY WITH THE THREE DIFFERENT ZONING OVERLAYS THAT WE HAVE TO.

BUT WHEN THE HOUSES ARE BUILT.

YOU WON'T KNOW THAT.

LIKE, OH, THIS IS OBVIOUSLY ZONED FOR SOMETHING DIFFERENT ON THIS STREET.

IT'S THEY'LL ALL BE VERY SIMILAR.

OKAY. VICE CHAIR MOLLY.

I'M NOT SURE WHO TO ADDRESS THIS QUESTION TO, BUT IT'S PERTAINING TO CSX.

AND WE HAVE A CURRENT STANDING ISSUE WITH THEIR SERVICES IN REGARDS TO BEING ABLE TO CROSS THE TRACKS.

SO IF YOU'RE BRINGING IN MORE PEOPLE TO THE COMMUNITY, WHICH MORE THAN LIKELY ARE GOING TO WORK OUTSIDE OF THE VILLAGE. HAS THERE BEEN ANY STUDIES OR COMMUNICATION WITH CSX TO ENSURE THAT THESE PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO GET ACROSS THE TRACKS? WE'VE DONE A TRAFFIC STUDY.

WHO WOULD DO THE TRAFFIC? YES, I'LL ADDRESS THAT.

FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS BRIAN KELLY.

I'M A TRAFFIC ENGINEER WITH SIMMONS WHITE.

I'M A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA.

WERE YOU SWORN IN? I HAVE BEEN SWORN IN.

THANK YOU. WE HAVE DONE A TRAFFIC STUDY AND IT SHOWS IT MEETS ALL APPLICABLE LEVEL OF SERVICE REQUIREMENTS, MEETS ALL THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.

ONE THING TO TO MAKE NOTE OF IS THIS DOES PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY AND ACCESS BOTH TO FAMILY AND TO FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD.

SO, FOR EXAMPLE, I KNOW THERE'S BEEN ISSUES IN THE PAST WHERE THE TRAIN WILL GET BACKED UP AND THAT POTENTIALLY BLOCKS FERNWOOD FOREST ROAD.

THIS PROVIDES A CONNECTION ALSO TO GET OVER TO FEMALE ROAD AND HAVE ANOTHER ACCESS POINT AS WELL.

SO THE TRAFFIC STUDY DOES, YOU KNOW, IT SHOWS THAT CAN ACCOMMODATE ALL THE TRAFFIC, MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS.

AND WE DO MEET AND WE DO PROVIDE ALL THIS CONNECTIVITY.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

OH, HOLD ON. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD.

YES, I HAVE A FOLLOW A FOLLOW UP QUESTION.

EXCUSE ME ONE SECOND.

SO, HI. I JUST HAD A QUESTION FOR THE WHAT ARE THE LOT SIZES? IT DOESN'T I. I UNDERSTAND THAT.

THOSE HOMES AND THINGS ARE JUST CURIOUS ON LOT SIZE.

AND THEY MAY ALL BE DIFFERENT, BUT.

IT'S ON THE SIDE PLANE.

WE HAVE OUR OUR ENGINEER WILL GRAB THAT DATA FROM THE SITE PLAN.

SO. OKAY, SO WHILE WE'RE WAITING FOR THAT BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER, WOULD YOU LIKE TO STATE YOUR COMMENT SO THAT THEY ARE ABLE TO ANSWER BOTH? THIS WAS WITH TRAFFIC.

YOU GO ON YOUR CONCLUSION.

PAGE 357 YOUR CONCLUSION.

IT SAYS THAT THE DEVELOPMENT WILL RESULT IN 1697 TRIPS PER DAY AND THAT THAT IS AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL.

[02:55:06]

KNOWING THOSE ROADS THAT WE HAVE, IT DOES SEEM LIKE THAT IS AN AWFUL LOT OF ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC FOR THE EXISTING ROADS.

AND I WAS WONDERING, BUT I DON'T I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING THERE.

THERE ARE ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ROADS BEING PLANNED.

THERE IS NO IMPROVEMENTS PLAN TO THE EXISTING PUBLIC ROADS.

NO, ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE THE INTERNAL ROADS.

THANK YOU FOR. CONFIRMING THAT? YES, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT.

IF YOU DON'T HAVE IT, I HAVE IT ON THE SIDE.

SO ON THE SECOND PAGE, ON THE SECOND PAGE OF THE SITE PLAN.

SO EACH ZONING DISTRICT HAS A REQUIRED LOT SIZE FOR THE LIMITED RESIDENTIAL.

IT'S A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 6000 SQUARE FOOT.

AND THE LOT SIZE IS UNLIMITED RESIDENTIAL RANGE FROM 6000 SQUARE FOOT TO 14,828 SQUARE FEET.

CAN YOU GIVE THAT WIDTH AND DEPTH? YES. SO ON A 14,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT, YOU'RE 68.8 FEET WIDE.

208 FEET.

POINT ONE 208.1 ON A 6000 SQUARE FOOT LOT HERE, 58 FOOT WIDE AND 105 FOOT DEEP.

SO ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE.

NOW YOU HAVE TWO REQUIRED LOT SIZES.

FOR. ATTACHED AND DETACHED FOR A DETACHED HOME.

ITS 4000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM.

AND THEN FOR AN ATTACHED HOME, IT'S 2000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM.

SO ON THE.

NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE.

I WANT.

SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE.

SO THE ATTACHED, WHICH IS THE 2000 SQUARE FOOT, THE SMALLEST IS 2017 FEET, 20 FOOT WIDE BY 100 FOOT DEEP.

EXCUSE ME, 100.8 FEET DEEP, I BELIEVE.

AND THEN THE LARGEST WOULD BE.

2300, WHICH WOULD BE 20 FOOT WIDE, 114.1 FEET DEEP.

NOW, ON THE DETACHED, THE 4000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM.

COULD YOU REPEAT THAT AGAIN? YOU SAID 20 FEET WIDE AND 114 FEET DEEP.

IS THAT WHAT YOU SAID, 114.1 FEET DEEP.

ON THE DETACH SECTION.

THE. LARGEST IS 12,756 SQUARE FEET, WHICH IS 56.4 FEET WIDE.

229 222.9 FEET DEEP.

IN THE SMALLEST WOULD BE 4035, WHICH WOULD BE 40 FEET WIDE, 105 FEET DEEP.

NOW ON THE VILLAGE MIXED USE.

THE MINIMUM SIZE LOT REQUIRED IS 2000 SQUARE FOOT.

2000 SQUARE FOOT.

AND THE SMALLEST LOT.

IS 4619 FEET, 40 FEET, 44 FEET WIDE, 105 FEET DEEP.

AND THE LARGEST LOT.

WOULD BE 13,576 SQUARE FEET, 77 FEET WIDE, 176.1 FEET DEEP.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? WE HAVE MORE. THEY'RE STILL PRESENT.

OH, YOU STILL PRESIDENT? OH, I BEG YOUR PARDON.

AND I APOLOGIZE AGAIN.

CYNTHIA ANGELOS, ON BEHALF OF THE TEAM AND I AM A LAWYER, THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS THAT WE NEED TO GET IN THE RECORD, SO I APOLOGIZE.

AND IF YOU'LL BEAR WITH US AND THE SEMI LEGALISTIC PRESENTATION.

BUT THIS IS A QUASI JUDICIAL PROCEEDING.

SO WITH THAT HAVING BEEN SAID, I'D LIKE TO CALL MR. MALLORY, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING, SIR. COULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE BOARD, PLEASE? GOOD EVENING. YES, TODD. MAORI, FOR THE RECORD.

AND WHAT IS YOUR PROFESSION? I'M A PROFESSIONAL PLANNER.

[03:00:02]

CAN YOU TELL THE BOARD ANY CERTIFICATIONS, YOUR EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND, ETC., PLEASE? YES, I AM AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PLANNERS, SO I HAVE THE AICPA DESIGNATION AS WELL AS I HAVE A MASTER'S IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING.

ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH? MUNICIPAL CODES, ZONING ORDINANCES, LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS? AND IF SO, HOW SO? I'M QUITE FAMILIAR WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AS WELL AS ZONING CODES.

I'VE PERSONALLY WRITTEN 12 ZONING ORDINANCES AS WELL AS FOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLANS.

I HAVE BEEN KIND OF A UNIQUE CAREER COMPARED TO SOME, BUT I WAS I BEGAN MY CAREER AS A VILLAGE MANAGER AND THEN FROM THERE PROCEEDED BECAME A CITY MANAGER IN TWO CITIES, THEN A COUNTY COMMISSIONER TO SERVE TWO TERMS. I WAS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COUNTY BOARD ACTUALLY IN ST LUCIE COUNTY.

I HAVE BEEN INVOLVED AS BOTH THE CHAIR OF THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL.

I WAS THE CHAIR OF AFRICA, WHICH IS ALL REGIONAL COUNCILS ARE PART OF THAT.

I HAVE BEEN IN FACT I HAVE A BEAUTIFUL LITTLE LIST AND IF YOU'LL BEAR WITH ME, I'LL GIVE YOU JUST A COUPLE OF THESE ITEMS. BUT LIMITED TO PLEASE, MADAM.

THIS IS NOT COOL.

MADAM CHAIR. YES, A COUPLE OF THINGS.

OKAY, GO AHEAD. FIRST OFF, I WOULD ASK MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO PLEASE NOT LISTENING.

TO HOW MUCH TIME THE APPLICANT HAS.

THE APPLICANT HAS AS MUCH TIME AS THEY HAVE TO PUT ON THEIR CASE.

RIGHT. IS THAT WHAT HAPPENS? IS THAT HOW IT'S SET UP HERE? PERCY, PROCEED AGAIN.

I APOLOGIZE AND WE'LL GO AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN.

BUT THERE'S JUST CERTAIN THINGS THAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE.

I BEG YOUR PARDON, MR. MURRAY, HAVE YOU HAD THE OPPORTUNITY I BELIEVE YOU SAID, TO SIT ON A PLANNING BOARD AND REVIEW SITE PLANS.

I HAVE BEEN CHAIRMAN OF THE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD.

I'VE SERVED ON SEVERAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIONS, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.

I'VE BEEN INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS FOR ABOUT 33 YEARS NOW.

HOW MANY SITE PLANS DO YOU THINK THAT YOU'VE REVIEWED AS A MEMBER OF A PLANNING BOARD? I WOULD SAY WELL OVER 500.

ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWNS CODE AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT THE PLANNING BOARD MUST CONSIDER IN REVIEWING A MAJOR SITE PLAN? I AM I'VE REVIEWED THE STANDARDS AND HAVE GONE THROUGH THOSE EXTENSIVELY.

WITH REGARDS TO THOSE STANDARDS.

HAVE YOU ALSO REVIEWED THE SITE PLAN? THAT'S BEFORE THE BOARD.

I'VE REVIEWED THE SITE PLAN AS WELL.

CAN YOU RENDER AN OPINION WHETHER OR NOT YOU BELIEVE THE SITE PLAN COMPLIES WITH THE CODE, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND SPECIFICALLY THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS? 12 DASH 8.6.

SUBSECTION FIVE.

YES. BASED UPON THE STANDARDS THAT THE VILLAGE HAS IN PLACE, THESE ARE WHAT WE HAVE TO FOLLOW STRICTLY WHEN, WHEN REVIEWING ANY APPLICATION, THEY MEET THE FIVE STANDARDS AS LISTED THERE UNDER THAT SECTION.

AND WITH THAT HAVING BEEN SAID IN REVIEWING THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN'S LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AS IT RELATES TO THE APPROVAL CRITERIA.

WHAT IS THE OBLIGATION OF THE PLANNING BOARD IN REVIEWING THESE APPROVAL CRITERIAS? THIS IS A CHALLENGE FOR ANY BOARD.

YOU'RE A NEW COMMUNITY.

YOU'RE WORKING THROUGH GROWING PAINS.

I APPRECIATE THAT. HAVING BEEN THROUGH THIS MYSELF, IT'S REALLY A TOUGH CHALLENGE.

SO I APPLAUD YOU FOR WHAT YOU'RE DOING.

THE DIFFICULTY IS THAT YOU HAVE THE ZONING ORDINANCE AS WELL AS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT SPECIFICALLY STATE WHAT YOU MUST DO WHEN YOU'RE WHEN YOU'RE TAKING ACTIONS ON THIS.

UNFORTUNATELY OR FORTUNATELY, THE ACTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN STATED BY YOUR MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE STATE THAT IF THESE FIVE STANDARDS ARE MET, YOU MUST APPROVE SITE PLANS THAT ARE PRESENTED TO YOU.

YOU HAVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF REVIEWS, AND FOR THIS ONE, THIS IS LISTED AS A MAJOR SITE PLAN, ALL MAJOR SITE PLANS.

THIS IS NOT A REZONING.

THIS IS NOT A LAND USE CHANGE.

THIS IS A SITE PLAN MUST MEET THOSE FIVE STANDARDS OF APPROVAL.

AND AS YOU GO THROUGH THOSE WHICH WE HAVE THOSE AVAILABLE AS WELL, YOU'LL SEE THAT EACH OF THOSE STANDARDS HAVE BEEN MET.

AND IT BECOMES A CHALLENGE BECAUSE OF THIS AGAIN, BEING A QUASI JUDICIAL MATTER.

THE QUASI JUDICIAL MATTER MEANS IT'S DIFFERENT THAN A LEGISLATIVE MATTER.

LEGISLATIVE MATTERS ALLOW US TO HAVE MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR FEELINGS, FOR OUR OPINIONS, FOR OUR FEELINGS.

BUT UNFORTUNATELY, IN THESE SITUATIONS, BECAUSE IT'S QUASI JUDICIAL, WE HAVE TO FOLLOW EXACTLY THE PROCESS THAT'S BEEN ESTABLISHED BOTH BY STATE LAW AS WELL AS BY YOUR MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE. AND JUST ONE MORE QUESTION OR TWO.

WHAT'S THE ZONING DESIGNATIONS ON THE PROPERTY?

[03:05:04]

YOU HAVE NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE.

YOU HAVE VILLAGE USE MIXED USE AS WELL AS THE LIMITED RESIDENTIAL.

AND DOES THE SITE PLAN COMPLY WITH THE ZONING REGULATIONS? THE SITE PLAN COMPLIES.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR HELP.

WE APPRECIATE. THANK YOU.

THANK. OKAY.

DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE ANY.

ANYTHING FURTHER AT THIS TIME? UNLESS THERE'S QUESTIONS OF THE BOARD NOTES OR.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMENT.

OKAY. DO WE HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT? YES, MADAM CHAIR. DEBRA BANKS.

GOOD NIGHT, I GUESS I SHOULD SAY.

I AM GOING TO GIVE AN OPINION IN READING IT'S DIRECTED AT.

IT'S ACTUALLY TWO QUESTIONS.

ONE IS DIRECTED TO STAFF AND ONE TO THE UPPER EAST SIDE IN READING THE REPORT.

THE STAFF RESPONDS.

RED HAD A SENTENCE THAT SAID THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM DENSITY REQUIREMENTS.

AND I AGREE.

BUT IT SAID IT INTEGRATES INTO THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD.

WELL, I LIVE IN STATES WITH ONE AND TWO ACRE LOTS, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

FERNWOOD HAS A QUARTER ACRE, THIRD ACRE AND HALF ACRE LOTS, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

THE BOULEVARD.

EACH IS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITH LARGE LOTS.

SO I JUST WANTED TO SAY I DON'T THINK IT INTEGRATES WELL.

UM, IN REGARDS TO THE 19 TREES.

COULD I ASK YOU A QUESTION? WHAT'S THE POSSIBILITY OF KEEPING THEM IN ONE SPOT? I THINK IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS OF THE BOARD IF THE ATTORNEY.

YEAH. GENERAL, GENERALLY, IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION, YOU WOULD ASK IT OF THE BOARD AND THE BOARD MIGHT DIRECT A QUESTION TO THE APPLICANT.

THANK YOU. SO THE 19 TREES, WE IF YOU CAN PUT BACK UP THE PICTURE THAT SHOWS THE TREES IN THEIR ORIGINAL SPOTS.

I DON'T KNOW IF THAT CAN BE DONE EASILY, MA'AM.

NO, I DON'T. I DON'T KNOW WHICH WAY TO GO.

CAN YOU? I'M DOING OKAY.

OOPS. THE CLERK IS TURNING THE CHANGE IN.

OH, YOU ARE GOOD.

OKAY. I'M NOT TECHIE.

OKAY. I'M MOSTLY CONCERNED ON THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST PINE VIEW AND SOUTHWEST OAK.

THERE IS A GROUP.

OF 12 OF THE SPECIMEN.

IN THAT GENERAL AREA.

BUT IN LOOKING AT THE PLANS, I SAW THAT THERE ARE NINE HOUSES LINED UP IN A ROW THERE.

AND I'M WONDERING ABOUT THE FEASIBILITY OF MAYBE MOVING THE HOUSES TO ANOTHER SPOT.

AND THAT'S A QUESTION FOR THE BOARD.

BOARD, WE LIKE THE BOARD WOULD LIKE TO DIRECT THAT QUESTION TO THE APPLICANT.

THANK YOU. ARE YOU DONE WITH YOUR PUBLIC COMMENT? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

AGAIN ED WEINBERG FOR THE RECORD, THAT.

WHERE DID THE QUESTION COME FROM? RIGHT. THE PURPOSE OF THE RELOCATION IS TO ADD THE PROTECTION TO THE TREES.

IF YOU STOP ONE LINE, LEAVE A 20 FOOT SPACE FOR A TREE AND STOP ANOTHER LOT LINE, YOU'RE GOING TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF SURVIVAL OF THE TREE. THE IDEA HERE IS TO PUT THEM INTO LOCATIONS THAT CAN BE MANAGED, CAN BE PROPERLY TAKEN CARE OF AND NOT GUARANTEE, BUT DO THE BEST WE CAN TO HAVE THOSE TREES SURVIVE.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ANY MORE QUESTIONS? ERNEST BANKS.

ERNEST BANKS.

PARDON ME. I'M GOING TO STAND IN A MINUTE FOR A WALK UP.

I'VE BEEN SITTING ALONE. MY NAME IS ERNIE BANKS.

I'VE LIVED IN PALM OAK STATE SINCE 2000, AND I LIVED IN INDIAN TOWN 22 YEARS BEFORE THAT.

I GRADUATED FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA WITH A FORESTRY DEGREE IN 1978, AND THE COMPANY THAT HIRED ME SENT ME HERE, AND I'VE NEVER REGRETTED IT.

I WROTE ALL THIS CRAP, BUT I'M NOT GOING TO BORE YOU GUYS WITH IT.

BUT I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.

[03:10:02]

WHAT'S THE AVERAGE? ASK THE FELLAS.

WHAT'S THE AVERAGE DB OF THE 19 TREES? AND I DON'T NEED. I DON'T NEED A.

EXACTLY. JUST A ROUGH IDEA.

THE BEST YOU CAN COME UP WITH OF THE DB OF THE 19 TREES.

THEY'RE GOING TO RELOCATE APPLICANTS.

COULD YOU PLEASE ADDRESS THAT? MADAM CHAIR, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT PUBLIC COMMENT BE OFFERED IF YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS.

GO AHEAD. AND SO I'M TRYING TO ASK AN INFORMED QUESTION.

GENERALLY PUBLIC COMMENT IS IS DIRECTED TOWARD MAKING YOUR COMMENT.

AND YOU CAN YOU CAN ASK QUESTIONS THAT THEN CAN BE DIRECTED TO STAFF.

BUT AN INTERACTIVE BACK AND FORTH IS NOT GENERALLY HOW IT WORKS.

SO I'M ASKING THEM TO CAN YOU ASK THE FELLOWS? WHAT'S THE AVERAGE DB OF THE 19 TREES THAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT RELOCATING? AND WE HAVE A LIST OF QUESTIONS HERE THAT MIGHT BE HELPFUL AND THEN WE CAN RESPOND TO THEM.

OKAY. THAT THAT THAT THAT'S WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND IF IF YOU IF YOU HAVE A LIST, JUST SHARE WITH YOU.

CAN YOU SHARE THEM LAST.

BUT I'M NOT GOING TO BORE YOU GUYS WITH ALL THIS BECAUSE THERE WAS SOME OPINION IN HERE AND I'M NOT REAL HAPPY, SO I'M NOT GOING TO SAY THAT.

YES, SIR. AND YOU'RE WELCOME TO SHARE IT, OF COURSE.

WELL, NO, I'M NOT.

I'M NOT GOING TO SUBJECT THESE FOLKS, MY NEIGHBORS, TO ANY MORE BY MOUTH THAN I HAVE TO.

I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION, THOUGH, THAT I WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER TO IF WE COULD.

OR ACTUALLY, I GUESS IT'S A STATEMENT I'VE HEARD THE STATEMENT THAT THEY'RE GOING TO PRESERVE 1064 TREES.

OK. THAT'S WONDERFUL.

JUST REMEMBER THIS IN THE FOREST INDUSTRY.

A TREE CAN BE A TREE AS TALL AS ME.

IN THIS BIGGER ROUND.

TECHNICALLY, THAT'S A TREE.

AND THAT'S JUST A FACT.

SO I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE GOING TO PRESERVE.

50 OR 60 THAT ARE 30 FOOT TALL OR IF THEY'RE GOING TO BE MOST OF THEM ARE GOING TO BE SIX FOOT SIX LIKE ME AND AN INCH IN DIAMETER, I DON'T KNOW.

SO THAT'S A VERY.

YOU KNOW, JUST A LOOSE TERM.

AND I JUST WANTED THE BOARD TO KNOW THAT THE DEFINITION OF A TREE CAN BE THAT SMALL, AND IT TECHNICALLY IS A TREE.

AMERICA, SHARIFA.

IS A TREE, EVEN THOUGH IT'S ONLY ABOUT THIS TALL AND IT'S ONLY ABOUT THIS BIG AROUND.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. THAT WAS GOOD INFORMATION.

WOULD YOU LIKE WOULD YOU LIKE TO LET THEM RESPOND? DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE WITH PUBLIC COMMENT OR ALLOW THE RESPONSE FOR YOUR.

YOU CAN. OKAY.

I'M SURE. ABSOLUTELY. ALL RIGHT.

GO AHEAD, SIR. SO WE HAVE NOT CALCULATED AN AVERAGE DB.

THE THE EXACT DB OF EACH OF THOSE TREES IS SPECIFIED IN THE REPORT THAT WE PROVIDED WITH THE TREE INVENTORY.

I CAN SIT IN THE BACK AND SEE IF I CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THE AVERAGE IS, IF YOU'D LIKE, WITH REGARD TO THE 1064 TREES BEING PRESERVED.

THERE IS ALSO A TABULAR SUMMARY IN THE BACK OF THE THE TREE INVENTORY MEMO AND THOSE DB HS VARY FROM SEVERAL INCHES UP TO 40 OR MORE.

I THINK THERE'S A 47 INCH TREE IN THERE.

SO THERE YES, THERE ARE TREES.

WE USE THE DEFINITION IN THE CODE OF WHAT IS A TREE AND THAT WAS HOW THE INVENTORY WAS DONE.

OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

JOHN. JP PASQUAL OH, HELLO, EVERYBODY.

GLAD TO BE HERE. WANT TO POINT TO SOMETHING OR MY HOUSES? NO, SIR. I'M GOING OVER HERE.

THAT'S MY HOUSE. SO, YOU KNOW, AND I WAS BORN IN FLORIDA AND.

MY NAME IS JOHN PASQUALE, AND I WAS SWORN IN.

AND I APPRECIATE THE PRAYER EARLIER.

AND I TRIED TO FOLLOW THAT, YOU KNOW, TRUST IN THE LORD NOT TO BE.

YOU ARE NOT MY ENEMIES.

NONE OF YOU, THE BUILDER, ARE NOT MY ENEMIES.

WHAT HAPPENED WAS A TERRIBLE THING.

A FEW YEARS AGO, SCOTT WATSON WAS TALKING ABOUT WHEN THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS PUT OUT.

AND NOW REALLY, UNLESS YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE DOWN ALL THESE PICTURES AROUND THIS ROOM, IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY PEOPLE FOR SOME REASON, BUT IT'S ALL THESE BEAUTIFUL SITES.

SO CAN YOU SPEAK IN THE MIKE? YEAH, UNLESS YOU'RE GOING TO CHANGE THIS WHOLE TOWN, JUST START TAKING THESE PICTURES DOWN.

GET RID OF ALL OF THIS STUFF BECAUSE IT'S ALL GOING TO BE GONE BECAUSE THEY ARE LEGALLY RIGHT.

THEY ARE MORALLY AND ETHICALLY COMPLETELY WRONG, BUT THEY'RE LEGALLY RIGHT.

AND THE ONLY WAY TO SOLVE THIS IS TO START OVER.

I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU DO IT, BUT DISBAND, STOP.

SHUT YOURSELVES DOWN.

STOP TRYING TO FIX THE MESS THAT WAS CREATED.

YOU'RE ALL IN HERE TRYING TO FIX IT.

EVEN ALL OF YOU. ABOUT 19 TREES.

WE'RE TRYING TO FIX SOMETHING THAT CAN'T BE FIXED.

WE HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE DOORBELL.

THAT MEANS STOP THE WHOLE THING.

SHUT THIS VILLAGE DOWN AND START OVER.

[03:15:01]

TAKE A VOTE. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

THAT'S THE ONLY WAY. OR THIS WHOLE TOWN IS GOING TO BE LIKE THIS.

THANK YOU. GOD BLESS YOU ALL.

THANK YOU, SIR. GREG ZISKA.

THANK YOU. GREG OSCAR.

YES. MY NAME IS GREG SEEGER.

I GREW UP ON BOULEVARD.

I'M AN EDUCATOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA DESIGN, PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION.

I'VE BEEN IN DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS FOR 40 YEARS AND HAVE REVIEWED SOME OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PACKAGE THAT WAS ONLINE, WHICH I HAVE TO COMPLIMENT THE CITY OF.

VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN IS A VERY NICE PRESENTATION AVAILABLE TO THE PEOPLE ONLINE.

I HAVE SOME CONCERNS THOUGH, WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT, HOW IT'S LAID OUT AND THE FACT THAT YOU REALLY A COUPLE OF THINGS.

THE ACCESS FOR THE 12 LOTS THAT FRONT THE MILL BOULEVARD THAT KIND OF GOT PUSHED TO THE SIDE.

AND THIS WHOLE DISCUSSION NOBODY MENTIONED ON THE DEVELOPER'S PART HOW THOSE ARE ACCESS POINTS.

YOU'VE GOT 12 HOUSES THAT FACE FROM BOULEVARD THAT ARE GOING TO ALL HAVE A DRIVEWAY AND TWO CARS THAT ARE GOING TO BE PARKED RIGHT AT THE EDGE THERE AND BACKING IN AND OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY. THE DRIVEWAY IS ON YOUR CIRCULAR PATTERN.

THERE ARE GOING TO BE 19 DRIVEWAYS IN THERE WITH CHILDREN AND EVERYTHING ELSE.

THIS IS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER.

AND A LOT OF THIS PLAN HERE, THE LANDSCAPING THAT IS BEING PROPOSED ALONG FAMILY BOULEVARD IS NOWHERE NEAR THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE THAT'S ON THERE RIGHT NOW.

AND I WOULD LIKE TO ASK, HAVE THE BOARD ASK THE QUESTION OF WHAT TREES, IF ANY, ARE BEING SAVED ALONG THAT WESTERN FRONTAGE OF DEVELOPMENT. THERE ARE NO OAK TREES, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT ARE SHOWN UP TO BE SAVED ALONG FAMILIAR BOULEVARD.

YOU'RE GOING TO PUT IN A LITTLE BERM WITH SOME LITTLE LOWE PLANTS AND A COUPLE OF LAKES AND LAKES ARE FAMOUS FOR DOING ONE THINGS, TRANSFERRING NOISE STRAIGHT FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT TO FORMAL BOULEVARD.

THERE'S NOT EVEN A REASONABLE BUFFER THERE.

YOU'VE GOT A COUPLE OF TREES ON THE ON THE FRONTAGE SET BACK THERE, BUT THAT'S MY CONCERNS AND QUESTIONS.

OKAY. WOULD YOU LIKE TO ANSWER THAT? THE APPLICANT. NICHOLAS KESSLER FOR THE RECORD.

SO IT'S KIND OF A HARSH STATEMENT, BUT IT WAS IT WAS MENTIONED BY A BOARD MEMBER EARLIER.

THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUIRED TO PRESERVE ONE TREE ON THIS PROPERTY THAT'S WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AREA.

I UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYBODY WANTS TO PROTECT EVERY TREE THAT IS ON THERE.

BUT THE HARSH REALITY IS EVERY OTHER HOME THAT YOU SEE ON YOUR SCREEN THERE ONCE WAS TREES THAT WERE CLEARED OUT TO DEVELOP PROPERTY. SO WE ARE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN TO SAVE AS MANY TREES AS POSSIBLE.

WE'RE SAVING 1064 TREES ON THIS SITE.

WE'RE DOING THIS BY ONLY CREATING A DEVELOPMENT AREA OF 160 76 HOME SITES.

IN ADDITION TO THAT, I GUESS NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED.

A LOT OF TALK TONIGHT ABOUT THE 19 TREES.

THIS IS SOMETHING, AGAIN, WE DON'T HAVE TO DO.

WE'RE DOING IT BECAUSE WE THINK IT'S IMPORTANT.

WE WANT TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS TO TO THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES IN INDIAN TOWN.

AND AGAIN, WE WANT TO CREATE A DEVELOPMENT THAT THAT THE TOWN CAN BE PROUD OF.

SO I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF TALK ABOUT TREES, BUT UNFORTUNATELY, THE CODE JUST DOESN'T REQUIRE US TO PRESERVE THESE TREES.

THANK YOU, PAUL.

PAUL. EXCUSE ME, PAUL SAFEGUARD.

I'VE BEEN HERE SINCE 1960, AND MY QUALIFICATIONS ARE I HAVE A BACHELOR'S DEGREE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, THE COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE.

I. LET'S SEE, WHAT ALL DID I DO? ON 1957 AND 58, WE CREATED THE ZONING FOR OUR CITY OF MARGATE, AND I ACTUALLY MOVED TO INDIAN TOWN IN 1960.

I'VE LIVED OPPOSITE THE ENTRANCE TO THIS PLACE FOR 60 YEARS.

THE LET ME THINK OF A FEW THINGS HERE.

OH, MY FIRST DEALINGS WITH OTHER ZONES.

I WAS 24 YEARS ON MARTIN COUNTY ZONING.

12 YEARS ON THE PLANNING THAT CREATED THE ORIGINAL COMP PLAN.

OKAY. I WAS 12 YEARS ON A CODE ENFORCEMENT.

AND IN 1991, I WAS I WAS ELECTED THE CHAIRMAN TO THE INDIAN TOWN STUDY, WHICH WE STUDIED FOR A YEAR AND A HALF.

15 PEOPLE THAT ALL OF THE PLANNERS FROM STUART, ANOTHER PLANNER FROM ORLANDO, CITY PLANNER TO

[03:20:03]

CREATE THE FUTURE FOR INDIAN TOWN.

THIS WAS A LOT. HOURS TWICE A MONTH AND WE'D BE PROBABLY 3 HOURS IN AN AFTERNOON JUST TALKING IT OVER, TALKING IT OVER ALL OF THE ZONING.

WE DIDN'T DO IT LIKE THIS WAS DONE IN THE DARK ONE NIGHT.

I MEAN, THIS IS REALLY PRETTY PATHETIC.

BUT WHAT WE HAD WE HAD A COUNCIL OF FIVE PEOPLE THAT HAD NEVER HAD ANY KIND OF EXPERIENCE LIKE THAT.

AND THEN WE HAD A VERY STRONG HANDED CITY MANAGER THAT HAD A PLAN.

SO I BROUGHT THIS UP FROM MIAMI.

I GUESS I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU GET THIS KIND OF CONCENTRATED DEVELOPMENT, BUT PARTICULARLY NOW THAT THIS SITE PLAN, WHAT HAPPENS IN ON FEMALE BOULEVARD ON OUR SIDE OF THE STREET, WE NOW HAVE TO GO SOUTH TO FIND A TURNAROUND TO COME UP NORTH.

AND WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WHEN WE GOT 1000 CARS HERE RUNNING ACROSS THE MEDIAN STRIP, THERE'S NO BLOCKAGE.

I THINK YOU HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY WHEN YOU'RE USING THE ROAD TO EITHER UPGRADED OR DO SOMETHING.

AND THERE WAS ANOTHER PROBLEM I READ IN THE REPORT, AND I CAN'T IMAGINE IT, IN 1972, I PUT THE SEWER, SEWER AND LIFT STATION IN ON FEMALE BOULEVARD.

OKAY, I PAID FOR IT.

I STILL PAID FOR WATER HOOKUPS AND SEWER HOOKUPS.

NOW WE COME ALONG AND THEY'RE GOING TO PUT A WATER LINE IN TO BRING WATER TO THIS OUTFIT, AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE CREDIT FOR ALL THE HOOKUPS.

THAT'S A LOT OF CREDIT, BELIEVE ME.

SO. THAT.

THAT'S ENOUGH. THE SIDEWALKS ARE TOO NARROW.

YOU COMPLETELY.

YOU COMPLETELY GUTTED THE FRONT END OF THE ENTRANCE.

AND I HAVE NO PROTECTION.

AND IT'S A BEAUTIFUL SIGHT THERE.

100 YEARS OF HISTORIC FLORIDA LANDSCAPE.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, SIR.

I APPRECIATE YOU. AND WE CAN MAKE A POND OUT OF IT THAT DOESN'T HAVE ANY WATER.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

LAST COMMENT CARD I HAVE IS MICHAEL AMMONS.

HEY, YOU AND MICHAEL EMMONS LIVED IN INDIAN TOWN ALL MY LIFE.

I THINK, AS HE SAID, THE HARSH REALITY IS THAT THAT COMMITTEE WAS DISSOLVED.

AND I FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO TAKE A STEP BACK.

OBVIOUSLY, WE CAN FIND OUT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE INVOLVED IN DISSOLVING THAT WHICH CLEARLY WERE INVOLVED IN THE LAND USE CHANGE, WHICH IS ALLOWING THIS WHICH IS CAUSING ALL THIS PROBLEM FOR EVERYBODY TO BE HERE.

YOU KNOW, IF THAT LAND USE WAS STILL WHAT IT WAS BEFORE AND THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, BIGGER LOTS, NONE OF US WOULD BE HERE RIGHT NOW.

SO I FEEL LIKE WE'VE GOT AN OBLIGATION TO FIND OUT WHO DISSOLVED IT, WHY, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY THEIR REASONS WERE TO CHANGE THIS LAND USE.

SO THAT WAS DONE, YOU KNOW, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS SOMEWHERE SO.

WELL, I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHY WE'RE DISCUSSING ALL THIS.

I FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THAT.

BEFORE WE DO ANYTHING ANY FURTHER.

AND GO FROM THERE IF IT WAS DONE.

IMPROPERLY. THEN.

WE SHOULD NEED TO PUT IT BACK.

YES, THAT'S RIGHT.

AMEN. I AGREE WITH YOU.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR.

OKAY. I ENTERTAINED IT FOR THE PUBLIC COMMENT.

OKAY. AND WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT AT THIS TIME.

DO WE GO BACK BEFORE WE CAN GO BACK OVER THE BOARD? YEAH, YOU'RE BACK TO THE BOARD FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION AMONG MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.

ALL RIGHT. OKAY.

YOU HAVE TO FILL OUT A CARD, MA'AM.

YOU HAVE TO FILL OUT A CARD, PLEASE.

I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS WHAT THE GENTLEMAN WAS JUST TALKING ABOUT PRIOR TO WHATEVER CHANGE TOOK PLACE.

I WASN'T HERE AT THE TIME AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED, BUT CLEARLY SOMETHING SOMEBODY DROPPED THE BALL ON THAT.

HOWEVER, PRIOR TO THAT IT WAS STILL FIVE HOMES PER ACRE.

SO THE 200 AND I BELIEVE I HAD IT HERE SOMEWHERE, 225 OR 275 HOMES COULD HAVE BEEN.

SO I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TO.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

YEAH. I DON'T WANT YOU TO GET UPSET.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

SO PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE, HOWEVER, IT HAPPENED.

IT WAS FIVE HOMES PER ACRE THERE, WHICH IS A 2.2 ACRE LOT.

[03:25:04]

VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'RE ENDING UP WITH NOW.

DUE TO THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO REGULATION FOR TREE PRESERVATION.

REGARDLESS OF HOW THAT MESS ALSO HAPPENED.

WHAT WE NEED TO CONSIDER HERE IS THAT WE HAVE A DEVELOPER THAT IS TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION A LOT OF THE THINGS THAT Y'ALL ARE CONCERNED ABOUT.

NOBODY WANTS INDIAN TOWN TO TURN INTO STUART.

I MEAN, WE ALL LIVE OUT HERE FOR A REASON.

I LIVE HERE IN INDIAN TOWN.

WE CHOSE INDIAN TOWN BECAUSE OF ITS BECAUSE OF ITS WILDNESS, REALLY.

AND SO NONE OF US WANT TO SEE IT OVERDEVELOPED.

HOWEVER, AS THE GENTLEMAN WHO JUST LEFT SAID, THEY ARE WELL WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS.

THEY'VE MET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS.

THEY'VE EXCEEDED EXPECTATION.

THEY COULD DO MUCH WORSE IF THEY WERE IF WE WERE TO DENY THIS APPLICATION TONIGHT.

I WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO SELL THIS PROPERTY TO SOMEONE WHO WILL COME IN AND PUT THOSE 604 UNITS ON.

WE ARE NOT DEALING WITH WHAT WE WE WOULD ALL LOVE TO SEE THOSE FIVE ACRE FARMS, I'M SURE.

I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT I'D LOVE TO SEE IT.

YOU KNOW, FIVE ACRE HORSE FARMS. THAT'D BE GREAT. RIGHT, EXACTLY.

BUT HERE'S THE DEVIL WE'RE DEALING WITH.

THIS HAS BEEN DONE.

IT CAN'T BE UNDONE.

WE CAN'T GO BACK.

WE CAN INVESTIGATE IT.

SOMEBODY MAY PAY DOWN THE ROAD FOR THE PROBLEMS THAT IT'S CAUSED.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

MEMBER OF SINGER.

I WASN'T FINISHED. OKAY.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE LATE. WE'RE NOT GOING TO CONTINUE TO BELABOR.

I KNOW YOU WASN'T QUITE FINISHED, BUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO CONTINUE TO GO BACK AND FORTH, BACK AND FORTH.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT. YES, MADAM CHAIR, LET ME JUST OFFER.

KEEP IN MIND, WE'VE GOT A WE'VE GOT A COURT REPORTER HERE TAKING ALL THIS DOWN.

MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE LET EVERYBODY ON THE BOARD SAY THEIR PIECE.

I IMAGINE THEY PROBABLY WON'T BE MUCH REVISITING OVER AND OVER AGAIN, BUT MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE ALLOW EVERYONE ON THE BOARD TO SAY THEIR PIECE.

I'LL CONTINUE.

WE ARE DEALING WITH.

POSSIBLY THE BEST OF ALL THE EVILS THAT COULD END UP BEING ON THIS PROPERTY BECAUSE THEY ARE VOLUNTARILY PRESERVING SOME OF THE TREES THAT THEY CAN, BECAUSE THEY ARE LITERALLY BUILDING 30% OF WHAT THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BUILD.

IF WE DON'T ALLOW THIS DEVELOPMENT, THEY CAN SUE US, FIRST OF ALL, BECAUSE THEY'VE MET ALL THE OBLIGATIONS.

INDIAN TOWN CAN'T AFFORD THAT.

SO I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE SOME OF THE POSITIVES ABOUT IT.

FIRST OF ALL, IF THEY DO WHAT THEY'RE SAYING THEY'RE GOING TO DO AND THEY MAKE IT A NICE COMMUNITY, IT'S GOING TO INCREASE ALL YOUR PROPERTY VALUES, NOT DECREASE THEM.

I'VE BEEN IN REAL ESTATE FOR 22 YEARS.

I'VE BEEN IN REAL ESTATE FOR 22 YEARS.

HAVING A NICE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S WELL MAINTAINED IN THE COMMUNITY WILL RAISE PROPERTY VALUES DURING THE WE.

WHERE. I'M NOT TALKING TO HIM RIGHT NOW.

I CAN'T ANSWER BACK AND FORTH.

I'VE BEEN ADVISED THAT I CAN'T DO THAT.

SO LET ME FINISH REALLY QUICKLY.

I THINK THAT WE HAVE TO CONSIDER WHAT OTHER OPTIONS WE MIGHT FACE IF WE DON'T LOOK AT THE POSITIVES OF THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION. THANK YOU.

OKAY. MEMBER WATSON, I'D LIKE TO JUST ASK YOU ALL TO BE VERY MINDFUL OF EVERYBODY'S TIME.

I KNOW WE ALL HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF THINGS THAT WE WANT TO SAY, BUT WE KEEP SAYING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER.

I MEAN, SO JUST, JUST PLEASE BE MINDFUL OF OTHER PEOPLE'S TIME, IF YOU WILL.

I AM. BUT WE HAVE A PUBLIC HERE IS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PROJECT.

SO YOU MAY HAVE HEARD THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

SO LET'S BE RESPECTFUL AND LET'S.

LET'S CONSIDER EVERYBODY.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

ONCE AGAIN, THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS NEFARIOUS THAT TOOK PLACE.

BUT GOING BACK.

THE LAND USE ON THEIR PROPERTY PRIOR TO INCORPORATION OF INDIAN TOWN WAS FIVE UNITS AN ACRE.

GOING BACK AND DOING THE MATH, IT WAS 270 UNITS ARE POSSIBLE UNDER MARTIN COUNTY LAND USE.

SO WITH THAT SAID, WE HAVE A DEVELOPER THAT'S COMING IN AND THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD 176 HOMES.

GUYS, I WISH WE WERE IN A DIFFERENT SITUATION.

I MEAN, THERE'S JUST CERTAIN REALITIES YOU CAN'T ESCAPE HERE.

AND THE REALITY IS I BELIEVE WE HAVE A DEVELOPER.

WHO IS IS IS BEING MINDFUL OF THE FACT.

THAT THIS IS A PIECE OF PROPERTY.

LOOK, I WISH IT WAS MYSELF.

I WISH IT WAS LESS HOLMES, LESS EVERYTHING.

BUT. BUT WE'VE GOT TO FOLLOW THE CODE.

WE'VE GOT TO FOLLOW THE LAW IN THIS CASE.

[03:30:03]

AND I KNOW MOST OF YOU PEOPLE ARE MY FRIENDS, AND I DON'T LIKE TO SIT HERE AND GIVE YOU THIS NEWS, BUT THEY'VE MET THE STANDARD THAT'S REQUIRED.

AND I AM WHEN IT COMES TIME TO VOTE, I WON'T HAVE TO VOTE FOR IT BECAUSE OF THEY'VE MET THE STANDARD.

THANK YOU. MADAM CHAIR, WE HAVE THAT ONE LAST PUBLIC COMMENT.

MS.. AMMONS, IF YOU COULD APPROACH AND STATE YOUR NAME ON RECORD.

SOME THINGS THAT WEREN'T.

MS.. AMMONS, IF YOU COULD STATE YOUR FULL NAME ON THE RECORD, PLEASE.

MARGARET AMMONS, DID YOU WANT TO KNOW MY BACKGROUND? NO, THAT'S OKAY. THANK YOU.

OKAY. ON THIS.

PRESSLER ASKED TWICE ABOUT THE FERNWOOD FOREST WATER THAT STANDS THERE, AND THE GENTLEMAN SAID.

THAT IT WASN'T ON HIS PROPERTY.

I'M SORRY. I'M NERVOUS.

SHE'S TALKING ABOUT BECAUSE I WALK PAST THERE EVERY DAY.

THIS LITTLE SECTION WHERE IT SAYS FERNWOOD FOREST.

AND IT TURNS ONTO OAK.

THAT'S WHERE IT'S WET ALL THE TIME.

AND THAT IS ON THEIR PROPERTY.

MM HMM. SO WHO WAS THE GENTLEMAN THAT SAID IT WASN'T YOU? YOU'RE WRONG. I'VE LIVED THERE FOR 36 YEARS.

OKAY. HERE IS THE OTHER ISSUE.

I DON'T AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT THE PROPERTY VALUES I HAVE.

I HAVE A COLD. I'M SORRY.

I HAVE BEEN A REALTOR FOR 18 YEARS.

I THINK THAT THAT WILL AFFECT OUR PROPERTY VALUES NEGATIVELY.

ALSO, WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IS REGARDING THE RENTALS.

IS THE DEVELOPER REQUIRED TO SELL OUTRIGHT A PERCENTAGE OF PROPERTIES BEFORE HE CAN DO THOSE RENTALS? A LOT OF DEVELOPMENTS JUST LIKE THIS HAVE A SPECIFIC PERCENTAGE THAT THE DEVELOPER MUST SELL BEFORE HE CAN DO THOSE RENTALS.

AND ARE THOSE RENTALS GOING TO BE PART OF THE HOA? BECAUSE RENTALS.

HERE AGAIN. THIS IS THE REALTOR IN ME.

RENTALS BRING PROPERTY VALUES DOWN.

THERE IS NO PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP RENTAL.

PEOPLE COULD CARE LESS WHAT THEY DO WITH THAT RENTAL.

SO IS SOMEBODY GOING TO MONITOR THAT AND MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO THE RIGHT THING? KEEP THEM LOOKING THE WAY THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO.

SO. AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST.

AND NOBODY'S ADDRESSED THAT.

AND I'M SURPRISED.

TO OPEN THE ROADS THROUGH BIRCHWOOD FOREST.

NOW, SOMEWHERE IN THIS PAPERWORK THAT I WAS LOOKING AT SAID THAT THEY WERE GOING TO RAISE THAT SPEED LIMIT.

TO 35 MILES AN HOUR.

SO WE'VE GOT THIS QUIET LITTLE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT THAT PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE DRIVING THROUGH HUNDREDS OF CARS BECAUSE THAT'S THE BACK WAY OUT.

THEY'RE TOO LAZY TO DRIVE OUT THE FRONT.

SO THAT'S GOING TO AFFECT ALL OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND I. I LIVE IN PAMUK'S ESTATES, BUT THOSE POOR PEOPLE IN FERNWOOD FOREST CANNOT POSSIBLY BE HAPPY ABOUT THAT.

THANK YOU, MA'AM. SO THERE YOU GO.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. WELL, SO MAY I ASK, WHAT DOES FOUR D ROAD MEANS? I DON'T KNOW. IT'S IN YOUR.

IT'S IN YOUR DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

OKAY. THE COURSE WILL BE FOR DATE.

DOES THAT MEAN YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE IT FOUR LANES? ONE. OKAY.

GO AHEAD, PLEASE.

SO TO ADDRESS THE TRAFFIC QUESTIONS, WE DID SUBMIT AND IT'S IN THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION, A DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY WHICH CONFORMS WITH ALL OF THE INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND THE ACCEPTED CRITERIA OF STATE AND NATION WIDE AND COMPLIED WITH WITH ALL THOSE FACTORS.

AND THE ROADS WERE DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF YOUR VERY OWN CODE.

A POINT TO A SECTION 6-2, SUBSECTION EIGHT OF THE OF THE INDIAN TOWN CODE, AND IT SAYS STREETS AND PROPOSED SUBDIVISIONS SHALL THAT SHALL WE HAVE NO CHOICE BE CONNECTED TO RIGHTS OF WAY IN ADJACENT AREAS TO ALLOW PROPER INTER NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC FLOW SO THE APPLICANT THE PROPERTY OWNER, HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO DESIGN THE ROADS AROUND THIS AREA THAT WAY.

[03:35:02]

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

OKAY. THIS HAS BEEN VERY INSIGHTFUL, I BELIEVE, FOR EVERYBODY.

WOULD YOU ALL AGREE? YES.

GOOD OR BAD? IT'S BEEN INSIGHTFUL.

RIGHT. OKAY.

SO WE'VE HAD TO CLOSE THIS TIME.

YES, SIR. OKAY.

THE PUBLIC. THE PUBLIC.

AND IT'S PUBLIC HEARING AND REQUEST DISCUSSION IS CLOSED.

WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO THE VILLAGE STAFF TO RECOMMEND THAT THE APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NUMBER SIX, DASH 21, DASH 625 WITH THE RECOMMENDATION.

THEN I'M MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE APPLICATION NUMBER SP DASH 20 1625.

WITH THE CONDITIONS.

ALL RIGHT. SO TO CLARIFY THAT FOR THAT'S RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION WITH WITH THE CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, CORRECT? IS THAT CORRECT? ALL RIGHT. I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION.

OKAY. ROLL CALL.

BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER NO.

BOARD MEMBER ON. SONGER YES.

BOARD MEMBER. SU HAYEK.

I SAY YES.

GIVEN THAT THIS WAS A JOB WELL DONE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND YOU CAN'T SAY YES OR NO.

BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS NO.

CHAIR. PALMER. NO.

IT PASSES. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR INDULGENCE.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, MEN THAT ARE LEAVING, PLEASE LEAVE THE MEETING QUIETLY.

WELL, PLEASE LEAVE THE OFFICERS.

CAN YOU HELP THEM TO LEAVE QUIETLY? NO, WE'RE NOT. MADAM CHAIR, I'D RECOMMEND MAYBE A TWO MINUTE RECESS TO LET ANYBODY WHO WAS GOING TO GO.

TO GO IN. TO GO.

AND THEN ONE MINUTE RECESS.

THIS ONE. OKAY.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE ARE RECONVENING.

PLEASE, EVERYONE, TAKE YOUR SEATS.

THAT WAS LEFT ON THE AGENDA.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER FOUR, AGENDA.

[4.  

DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PZAB RULES, REGULATIONS, AND PROCEDURES.

]

ITEM FOUR, DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE PCB BOARD.

RULES, REGULATION AND PROCEDURES.

STAFF. I'LL GO AHEAD AND HANDLE THIS, MADAM CHAIR.

I'LL GO AHEAD AND HANDLE THIS SIDE.

GIVE ME JUST ONE SECOND.

BOARD MEMBER ON SANGER HAD HAD A PROPOSAL TO AMEND YOUR PCA RULES, REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES.

WE'VE GOT A PROCEDURAL QUIRK IN THE RULES.

ACTUALLY COMES FROM ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO PROPOSE A AN AMENDMENT TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE, YOU CAN VOTE ON IT AT A MEETING.

IF IT HAD BEEN PROPOSED AT A PREVIOUS MEETING, AT A PROCEEDING MEETING.

IT'S BASICALLY IT TAKES TWO MEETINGS TO DO IT.

YOU PROPOSE IT AT ONE.

YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO DISCUSS IT.

YOU JUST PUT EVERYBODY ON NOTICE.

YOU WANT TO DO IT, AND THEN AT THE NEXT MEETING, YOU ALL CAN DO IT.

THAT'S WHAT ALL THIS ITEM IS.

SHE WAS PROPOSING TO AMEND THE ITEM IN YOUR RULES CONCERNING VOTING CONFLICTS. AND I HAVE THE I HAVE WHAT YOUR EMAIL WAS HERE BUT I'M HER SUGGESTION WAS TO AMEND THE PORTION OF THE RULES AND I APOLOGIZE. GIVE ME JUST ONE SECOND HERE CONCERNING VOTING CONFLICTS WHERE CURRENTLY READS AND SHALL ENTER AND ENTIRELY REFRAIN FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE DISCUSSION, CONSIDERATION OR PRESENTATION OF THE MATTER IN ADDITION TO OTHERWISE COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 1123143.

THIS IS YOUR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT YOU HAVE WHEN YOU HAVE A VOTING CONFLICT THAT YOU WOULD COMPLETELY REFRAIN FROM PARTICIPATING.

SHE IS PROPOSING A CHANGE.

AGAIN, YOU DO NOT EVEN NEED TO DISCUSS IT TONIGHT.

SHE'S JUST LETTING YOU ALL KNOW AND THEN YOU DISCUSS IT AT THE NEXT MEETING.

YOU CAN TAKE ACTION THERE ALONG THE LINES OF BUT MAY PRESENT INFORMATION THAT MAY BENEFIT THE BOARD IN MAKING A FULLY FORMED

[03:40:03]

DECISION. OKAY.

SO WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU, THE GRAVAMEN OF WHAT THE CHANGE WOULD BE IS A MODIFICATION TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT YOU NOT SAY ANYTHING, THAT YOU'D BE ABLE TO PRESENT INFORMATION THAT MAY BE BENEFICIAL IN MAKING A FULLY FORMED DECISION.

SO PRIMARILY THIS ITEM IS JUST FOR STAFF AND THE BOARD MEMBER TO LET YOU ALL KNOW THAT SHE INTENDS TO BRING THIS UP FOR ACTION AT YOUR NEXT OR AT ONE OF YOUR NEXT MEETINGS.

YOU ALL DO HAVE A SPECIAL PCB MEETING COMING UP IN TWO WEEKS.

IT MAY NOT BE ON THAT AGENDA.

DO YOU HAVE A CONCERN ONE WAY OR THE OTHER BEING ON THAT AGENDA VERSUS OUR REGULAR CYCLE? YEAH. YEAH.

SO IT'LL PROBABLY BE ON YOUR BOARD MEETING IN MARCH.

YOU HAVE A SPECIAL ONE COMING UP IN TWO WEEKS ADDRESS PARTICULAR, PARTICULARLY TO LAGO, PHASE ONE, B, SO.

VERY GOOD. AND, MADAM CHAIR.

THAT'S OKAY.

THAT'S ALL THE REGULAR AGENDA.

OKAY. NOW, WE'LL HAVE OUR DIRECTORS REPORT.

[5.  

Monthly Director's Report

]

MADAM CHAIR, I JUST WANT TO SAY CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR BOARD TONIGHT.

YOU HAD A TOUGH DECISION BEFORE YOU.

YOU GOT A LITTLE PEEK INTO WHAT MY LIFE IS LIKE.

IT'S TOUGH WHEN THE CODE.

CONFLICTS THAT WHAT THE COMMUNITY MAY OR MAY NOT SUPPORT.

BUT THE CODE IS THE CODE.

WITH THAT, I WILL SEE YOU GUYS IN TWO WEEKS ON THE 16TH.

PLEASE REMEMBER 6 P.M..

IT'S NOT A REGULAR MEETING DAY, BUT WE DO HAVE ONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR YOUR REFERENCE IN THE BACKUP YOU HAD JUST AN UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY, WHAT THAT WILL SEE ON THE 16TH AND WE'LL STILL HAVE OUR MEETING IN MARCH AS WELL.

HAVE A GOOD NIGHT.

THANK YOU. MEETING ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.