PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

Authorization to Extend Contract with NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Term, but not Increase the Not-to-Exceed Payment Amount, to Complete the Village of Indiantown Mobility Study and Proposal for a Mobility Impact Fee, Including an Implementing Ordinance.

]

EVERYBODY ELSE. YES. OKAY. AWESOME. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER SEVEN. AUTHORIZATION TO EXTEND CONTRACT WITH IN YUICHI URBAN CONCEPT YES, MADAM MAYOR I'M NUMBER SEVEN IS A REQUEST FROM STAFF TO EXTEND THE CONTRACT WITHIN URBAN CONCEPTS NOT TO EXCEED, UM THE. $142,000 ON APRIL 27TH THE BILLS VINNIE TOWN CONTRACTING WITHIN U E TO COMPLETE THE MOBILITY PLAN A PROPOSAL FOR A MOBILITY FEED AND THE DRAFT AND IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE. THERE HAS BEEN A COUPLE OF MEETINGS WITH MARTIN COUNTY. AS YOU KNOW, LAST WEEK WE MET, UM WITH MARTIN COUNTY.

PRESENT AT THAT MEETING WAS MYSELF THE ATTORNEY MAYOR. UH, GIBBS, THOMAS. AND, UM, STAFF.

UM PATRICK NOLAND, STEVE KRAMER. AND WE MET WITH THE COUNTY STAFF . AND SO WHAT WE'VE AGREED TO IS HAVE ANOTHER MEETING ON DECEMBER 7TH AS A FOLLOW UP AND BETWEEN NOW AND DECEMBER 7TH. OUR PLAN IS TO HAVE THE STAFF BOTH STAFFS OF BOTH THE COUNTY AND THE VILLAGE MEAT. AND, UH AND WITH SOME VERY SPECIFIC DETAILS ON WHAT THE ASK IS, AND SO WE'VE HAD. WE'VE HEARD FROM SOME OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS. ABOUT WHAT SOME OF THE NEGOTIATING POINTS OR BUSINESS POINTS WOULD BE AND WE PLAN ON DISCUSSING THAT WITH THE COUNTY STAFF. BEFORE THIS BEFORE DECEMBER 7TH MEETING CONSULTANT ISRAEL IS NEEDED IN ORDER FOR US TO DO, UM TO IMPOSE A MOBILITY FEED. AND UM AND WE NEED THE THIS TO BE COMPLETED SO THAT WE CAN SHARE THIS WITH MARTIN COUNTY SO THEY CAN SEE EXACTLY WHAT THE DETAILS ARE. YEAH. HOWARD. COUNCIL MEMBERS OF I COULD JUST ADD ON TO THAT A LITTLE BIT. HOWARD LISTED ALL THE STAFF THAT WAS WITH US. ALSO WITH US AT THAT MEETING WAS JONATHAN PAUL OF NEW URBAN CONCEPTS WHO IS THE PRIMARY STAFF OR CONTRACTOR WHO WILL BE INTERACTING WITH COUNTY STAFF, PARTICULARLY THEIR PROFESSIONAL STAFF, THEIR ENGINEERS AND SO ON TO GO THROUGH. THE MOBILITY PLAN AND STUDY THAT HE HAD PUT TOGETHER WITH RESPECT TO THIS AND WALK THROUGH THE ELEMENTS OF THE MOBILITY FEE AND MOBILITY PLAN. UM SO. THE EXTENSION OF THIS CONTRACT GOES PART AND PARCEL OF OUR CONTINUING DISCUSSIONS WITH MARTIN COUNTY TO HOPEFULLY BRING THIS IN FOR A LANDING. NOW JUST FOR SOME CLARIFICATION, MR BROWN. UM IF I HEARD YOU CORRECTLY, YOU SAID THIS NEEDS TO STILL BE COMPLETED. THE STUDY. WELL. THE STUDY IS. COMPLETED HIS CONTRACTS. NOT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT NEED TO BE DONE.

THERE ARE SOME TASKS THAT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED. OKAY YEAH, BECAUSE IN IN THAT MEETING, HE MADE IT VERY, VERY PLAIN THAT ALL THAT WHOLE STUDY HAD BEEN DONE. THEY HAD ALL THEIR FACTS. THEY HAD ALL THE INFORMATION. SO WHAT STILL NEEDS TO WHAT ARE THE POINTS THAT STILL NEED TO BE COMPLETED? THE IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE. THERE ARE, UM, THAT'S THE BIGGEST DELIVERABLE THAT I RECALL. ONE OTHER PIECE OF THE MOBILITY PLAN HAS BEEN COMPLETED BASED ON ALL THE INFORMATION AND DIRECTION HE HAD RECEIVED. WE GET TO A POINT ONE OF OUR POINTS OF DISCUSSION WITH THE COUNTY IS BY ONE MEANS OR ANOTHER. TAKING SOME OF THE POTENTIAL COUNTY PROJECTS. OUT OF OUR PLAN. KIND OF MOVING THEM OVER INTO THEIR PLAN ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. ALL OF THAT KIND OF CONSULTING SURGERY ON THE PLAN WOULD BE A PART OF UPDATING THAT PLAN TO ACCOMMODATE RESOLUTION WITH THE COUNTY. SO THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER PIECE THAT WOULD EVENTUALLY COME OUT OF IT, BUT FROM THE CURRENTLY SPECIFIED TASKS, IT IS THE IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE.

WHICH JUST SO YOU ALL KNOW THAT MAY SOUND LIKE OH, HEY, WAIT, JUST DRAFTED ORDINANCE WHEN IT COMES TO IMPACT THE ORDINANCES, INTEGRATING THAT ORDINANCE ITSELF AND THE MOBILITY. PLAN AND STUDY IS A LITTLE BIT MORE OF A CONSULTING TASKS THAN JUST ILLEGAL TASK. I'M GOING TO BE REVIEWING THAT ORDINANCE AS WELL, OBVIOUSLY, BUT A LOT OF IT COMES DOWN TO THE EXPERT REPORT

[00:35:05]

THAT THAT SUPPORTS THAT ORDINANCE AND INTEGRATES WITH IT. SO LET ME ASK THIS YOUR CLARIFICATION. YOU SAID THAT IT PULLED OUT AND IT WOULD BE A WHOLE NEW THING. IS THAT COVERED IN THIS FIELD? OR IS THAT GOING TO BE AN EXTRA COST? BUT NOT TO SEEK CONTRACT MAYOR. I MEAN, THIS IS A NOT EXCEED CONTRACT, SO ALL THAT THAT THAT THAT MR VOTES JUST EXPLAINED ABOUT HOW HE WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK, AND THAT'S NOT INCLUDED WITH WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE. THAT IS WHAT HE WILL BE DOING TO COMPLETE THOSE TASKS AND PULLING OUT AND HAVING TO REWRITE THAT IS INCLUDED IN THIS COST. I BELIEVE SO. I BELIEVE SO THEY ARE I MEAN, HE'S ON HE. OKAY WELL, HE'S NOT ONLINE NOW, BUT I CAN CONFIRM THAT. BUT THAT'S THAT'S MY B A GOOD THING TO CONFIRM YOU. UM, IS THERE COUNCIL MEMBER APOLLO YEAH. MR WADE. MY QUESTION IS TO YOU. YES, SIR. DO WE NEED MOBILITY STUDY. TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COUNTY. WE DO AND LET ME LET ME TALK YOU THROUGH? WHY? SO WHAT THE COUNTY HAS SET UP. IN THEIR IMPACT THE ORDINANCE, OKAY IS A METHODOLOGY WHEREBY IF A MUNICIPALITY THIS ORIGINALLY SET UP FOR THE CITY OF STEWART, OBVIOUSLY BEFORE THE VILLAGE EXISTED, BUT IF A MUNICIPALITY COMES INTO THE COUNTY WITH A STUDY WITH EVIDENCE TO BACK UP AND ADJUSTMENT OR REDUCTION IN THE IMPACT FEES BEING CHARGED WITHIN THAT MUNICIPALITY, WHERE THEY CAN DEMONSTRATE BY EFFECTIVELY AN IMPACT THE STUDY THAT THE IMPACTS THAT THE COUNTY IMPACT FOR YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE OFFSETTING. ARE INSTEAD BEING OFFSET BY THAT IMPACT FEE OR MOBILITY FEE WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY, THEN THEN THE COUNTY IS EMPOWERED TO NEGOTIATE AND ADJUSTMENT DOWNWARD. OF THE IMPACT THE COUNTY IS CHARGING. OKAY IN PARTICULAR, WE'RE FOCUSING ON THE COUNTIES TO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT PHASE. ALRIGHT THE BIG ONE HAS TO DO WITH ROADS. MUCH SMALLER ONE HAS TO DO WITH SIDEWALKS AND THINGS LIKE THIS, BUT THE PRIMARY THING IS ROADS. THAT'S THE BIG ONE. SO IT IS. IT IS THAT STUDY THAT IS GIVING US ANYTHING TO WORK WITH BOTH PRACTICALLY AND LEGALLY TO HAVE THAT NEGOTIATION WITH THE COUNTY TO SET THAT UP, ALL RIGHT. THE OTHER PIECE IS THIS. THE WAY IT WORKS UNDER THE MARTIN COUNTY ORDINANCE, AND THE WAY WOULD HAVE TO WORK LEGALLY FROM THE WAY IMPACT THESE WORK AND ARE IMPOSED AND SO ON. IS THERE WOULD BE TWO PARTS AND KIND OF SHIFTING OVER THIS MONEY TO THE VILLAGE. IT WOULD BE A REDUCTION. IN THE COUNTY'S TRANSPORTATION IMPACT. OKAY AND THEN THE VILLAGES, IMPOSITION OF AN IMPACT THE OR MOBILITY FEE, MOST LIKELY BASED ON THE GUIDANCE YOU ALL HAVE PROVIDED DIRECTION YOU'LL HAVE PROVIDED TO KIND OF FILL IN THAT GAP. OKAY? GOLD BEING PRESUMABLY DO NOT IMPOSE GREATER BURNING ON DEVELOPERS THAN IS CURRENTLY THERE BUT SHIFTING IT TO THE VILLAGE TO THE VILLAGE CAN PUT IT TO ITS PRIORITIES THAT TAKES TWO PARTS. THAT SECOND PART TO IMPLEMENT THAT IS ALL IN HAVING AN IMPACT THE OR MOBILITY FEED GOING FOR TRANSPORTATION, BUT IT'S ALSO NEEDED FOR THE FIRST PART LEGALLY FOR THE COUNTY TO BE ABLE TO REDUCE IT WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY. I HOPE THAT HELPS . I KNOW. I KNOW IT'S COMPLICATED IMPACT. THESE ARE COMPLICATED THERE. MASSIVE COMPLICATIONS. BUT THAT THAT IS. THAT'S THE MEANS BY WHICH WE DO IT ON THE FIRST PART, GETTING THE COUNTY TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT AND THEN SECOND FOR US TO IMPOSE OUR PEACE. SO WE'RE GETTING INSTEAD OF THE COUNTY. OKAY BUT WHAT'S STOPPING US FROM SITTING DOWN WITH THE COUNTY? AND SAYING, OKAY, WE UNDERSTAND YOU NEED THIS, SO WE'LL GIVE YOU 80% AND 90% WHEN NEGOTIATE WITH THEM . WHY DO WE NEED TO STUDY TO DO THAT? I DON'T UNDERSTAND IT BECAUSE THAT'S HOW I UNFORTUNATELY I RECOGNIZE THE FRUSTRATION AT. THAT'S HOW IMPACT FEES WORK IMPACT FEES ARE NOT ATTACKS. OKAY? THEY LOOK A LOT LIKE ATTACKS. FOLKS SAY HEY , YOU KNOW THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO SIDESTEP THAT YOU'RE IMPOSING MORE MONEY ON PEOPLE THAT'S ATTACKS WELL. IMPACT FEES ARE SUPPOSED TO BE OFFSETTING THE IMPACTS THAT ARE CAUSED BY NEW DEVELOPMENT. ALRIGHT BECAUSE IT'S CHARACTERIZED AS NOT ATTACKS, BUT INSTEAD THIS IMPACT THE THEY'RE VERY SERIOUS CONSTRAINTS ON HOW YOU CAN IMPOSE THEM HOW YOU CAN ALLOCATE

[00:40:07]

HOW THE MONEY IS SPENT. AND SO ON. ALL RIGHT, AND IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT AS BETWEEN TWO GOVERNMENTS, THEY COULD JUST SAY WELL WITHOUT A STUDY WILL JUST WILL JUST CUT OFF X YEAR OR WE WON'T CUT OFF X WILL JUST HAND YOU HALF OF IT. BOTH OF THOSE THINGS WOULD BE ILLEGAL. ALL RIGHT. FIRST ONE TO JUST SAY WITHOUT ANY SORT OF STUDY OUT WITHOUT ANY SORT OF UM UH, PROFESSIONAL BACKING AND STUDY TO JUSTIFY THAT IT WOULD COMPLETELY UNDERMINE THE LEGALITY OF THEIR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT. THE COUNTYWIDE BECAUSE THEY JUST DECIDED. HEY, GUYS RIGHT HERE. GOING TO HAVE TO PAY MORE IMPACT FEES, TRANSPORTATION IMPACT THESE THEN GUYS RIGHT HERE, AND WE HAVE NO STUDY TO JUSTIFY DOING THIS RATHER THAN THIS. YOU CAN DO THAT WITH TAXES BECAUSE THEY HAVE ALL SORTS OF POWER TO TAX HERE TAX AT WHATEVER. BUT THEY CAN'T DO THIS . AND THEN THIS THE OTHER PIECES THEY CAN'T JUST TAKE IT ALL AND SAY ALL RIGHT? WILL WILL JUST GIVE YOU HALF OF IT, OKAY? THAT WILL GIVE YOU X PERCENT OF IT. ALRIGHT THEY CAN'T GO TAKE THAT AND PUT IT INTO SOMETHING ELSE WITHOUT BASICALLY ALL THE RAILS BEING ON THAT IS IMPOSED ON THEIR OWN IMPACT FAITH. OKAY, SO THAT'S WHY THIS IS WHEN THIS IS SHAKEN OUT IN ITS VARIOUS WAYS, LIKE FOR EXAMPLE, IN UM, PORTS, ST LUCIE AND ST LUCIE COUNTY AND SO ON. THIS IS HOW IT SHAKES OUT A REDUCTION IN IMPACT THE WITHIN THE MUNICIPALITY AND THEN A CITY IMPACT FEE THAT FILLS IN THE GAP. SO THOSE ARE THOSE ARE THE TWO PIECES. IT'S A REDUCTION IN THE COUNTY IMPACT FEE THAT THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE MODE THAT WE WERE. WE STARTED DISCUSSION ON THAT OUR MEETING LAST WEEK IS IN TWO PARTS, ONE OF WHICH INVOLVES THE COUNTY. UM THE FIRST PART, IS NEGOTIATING A REDUCTION. BY THE COUNTY. THAT REDUCTION HAS TO BE JUSTIFIED UNDER THEIR ORDINANCE, AND REALLY, UNDER THE LAW OF IMPACT FEES. THEY JUST BUILT IT INTO THEIR ORDINANCE TO EXPRESSLY SAY WHAT'S REQUIRED. UM IT HAS TO BE JUSTIFIED BY A STUDY FOR THEM TO SAY IN THIS AREA, BUT NOT THIS AREA. WE'RE GOING TO REDUCE IT. OKAY THAT'S THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE AS AS THE PRIMARY TOOL. FOR THAT DISCUSSION. OKAY? WAIT THIS IS JONATHAN. I DON'T KNOW IF IT HELPS OR NOT AT ALL ON THE CONSULTANT FOR THE VILLAGE, THE COUNTY IS EVEN HIRED A FIRM TO REVIEW INDIAN TOWN STUDY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE MEET THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW THE COLONY TO DO A REDUCTION ANY TYPE OF FEE THAT'S IMPOSED. HAS TO BE JUSTIFIED BY A TECHNICAL ANALYSIS BEHIND IT. WHETHER IT BE THE COUNTY, THE VILLAGE OR ANYBODY. IF YOU'RE ASKING AND DEVELOPER TO PAY MONEY. YOU HAVE TO HAVE A JUSTIFICATION FOR THAT AMOUNT THAT YOU'RE ASKING THEM TO PAY. THE COUNTY IS NOT JUST GOING TO WILLINGLY GIVE UP. FUNDS THAT THEY COULD SPEND ANYWHERE. WEST OF INTERSTATE 95.

WITHIN THE ENTIRE COUNTY. AND JUST SAY, INDIAN TOWN YOU CAN MONEY. BECAUSE WADE'S RIGHT THAT YOU DO NEED A JUSTIFICATION AND TECHNICAL STUDY AND WE'VE WE'VE LARGELY PREPARED THE STUDY AND THIS IS REALLY TO WRAP IT UP AND TO GO TO THE IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE. AT THIS PHASE, SOME MAJORITY OF THE ACTUAL STUDYING THE PLAN HAS ALREADY BEEN COMPLETE. MAYOR. WOULD YOU MIND FIGHT? MASTER JONATHAN, I'M REALLY GLAD YOU'RE ON. THANK YOU, UM AND QUESTION HAD COME UP ON THE ISSUE OF UM, AS WE'RE WRAPPING IT UP AND PREPARING THE ORDINANCE AND ALL THAT PIECE IF IT COMES TO BE AND DISCUSSIONS WITH COUNTY AS WE'VE DISCUSSED BEFORE THAT, ULTIMATELY IT COMES TO BE SOME OF OUR, UM, DISCUSSIONS AND PROJECTIONS ON COUNTY PROJECTS AND SO ON ENDS UP GOING THE DIRECTION OF WELL WE'LL. WE'LL TAKE THAT OUT OF OUR PLAN PIECE AND IT'LL KIND OF MIGRATE OVER INTO THE COUNTY. PLAN PEACE AND WE WON'T INCLUDE THAT IN OUR FEE. UM IN OUR MOBILITY FEE THAT WOULD BE ENCOMPASSED WITHIN YOUR SCOPE OF WORK TO BRING THIS IN FOR A LANDING, RIGHT? YES I MEAN, IF WE HAD TO TAKE SOME PROJECTS OUT AND MOVED THE NUMBERS AROUND,

[00:45:02]

WHICH CERTAINLY DO THAT AS PART OF OURSELVES. FANTASTIC. THANK YOU, JOHN. THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? CONCERNS. I BELIEVE WE MAY HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS. YES, WE DO. MADAM MAYOR SCOTT WATSON. SCOTT WATSON. FOR THE RECORD. I'VE EXPRESSED THIS CONCERN BEFORE YOU HAVE AN IMPACT FEED, WHICH MUST BE JUSTIFIED. THE CITY OR THE COUNTY MUST JUSTIFY THAT. I CAN'T HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS, BUT I WOULD LIKE ONE OF YOU ALL TO ASK. IS THERE ANY CONSTRAINT UPON THE MOBILITY FOR YOU GOING FORWARD? DOES IT HAVE TO BE JUSTIFIED TO HIS STUDY, AND SO ON AND SO FORTH? OR IS THIS WE'RE OPEN PANDORA'S BOX BECAUSE I CAN TELL YOU RIGHT NOW WE PAINTED LOTS OF PRETTY PICTURES IN THE PAST YEAR IN INDIAN KIND OF THINGS WE'D LIKE TO HAVE THE A IS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE. WE'VE GOT BEAUTIFUL STUDIES AND BEAUTIFUL PICTURES. BUT WE CAN'T AFFORD MOBILITY PLAN. IT SOUNDS GREAT GUYS, BUT THE COST TO IMPLEMENT THIS IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A NEW DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS A BIG DEVELOPMENT, IT'S EASY TO IMPLEMENT THOSE SORT OF THINGS SIDEWALKS TOO. THIS TOO, THAT WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS OR EXISTING DEVELOPED COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND YOU'RE SUDDENLY GOING TO IMPOSE THIS THIS MOBILITY PLAN. THE COST OF THAT IS GOING TO BE ASTRONOMICAL AND WHAT I'M WORRIED ABOUT. ARE THERE GOING TO BE CONSTRAINTS UPON THE MOBILITY PLANT FEED THAT ARE GREATER THAN WHAT THE IMPACT FEE WOULD BE. FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU ALL COULD JUST VOTE AND SAY, WELL, YOU KNOW WE'RE GOING TO TRIPLE THAT. I DON'T KNOW. I HAVEN'T HEARD THAT ANSWER YET. I KNOW THE IMPACT FEES MUST BE JUSTIFIED, DOESN'T IT DOES THE FEE FOR MOBILITY MUST BE JUST ABOUT AND WHAT'S THE CRITERIA? IS IT JUSTIFIED ON WE'RE GONNA BUILD SIDEWALKS THROUGHOUT ITS ENTIRE ENDING TOWN? IS THAT THE CRITERIA WE'RE GONNA USE? SO I'D BE VERY SUSPICIOUS OF THIS. WE PAID 140 SOME ODD 1000. I UNDERSTAND. WE NEED TO STUDY WHICH IS WHETHER IT BE AN IMPACT FEE STUDY OR MOBILITY FEE STUDY. IT ARRIVES AT THE SAME POINT THAT WAS NECESSARY NEGOTIATE WITH THE COUNTY. BUT I WOULD BE VERY, VERY LEERY RIGHT NOW OF IMPLEMENTING AN ORDINANCE WHICH IS GOING TO CREATE A MEAL MOBILITY PLAN BECAUSE I HAVEN'T HEARD OF THAT. THERE'S AN END OR HOW HOW THAT'S REGULATED OR HOW THE FEE MAY BECOME ABOUT. WE DON'T NEED TO DO THIS RIGHT NOW. WITH NEGOTIATE WITH THE COUNTY. LET'S GET THE FAIR SHARE OF THE OF THE OF THE CUT. THE LOWERING OF THE IMPACT OF THE COUNTY WILL MAKE UP THAT DIFFERENCE. WHAT THE INDIAN TOWN IMPACT FEE BUT THIS WHOLE MOBILITY STUDY THING MAKES ME NERVOUS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, SIR. THE FINAL SPEAKER, MADAM MAYOR. OKAY THANK YOU. YES, SIR. PLEASE BE GLAD TO ADDRESS IT BECAUSE MR WATSON RAISES VERY GOOD POINTS AND JONATHAN PROBABLY CHIME IN AS WELL. UM, IN. JONATHAN I MAY HAVE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT. HE'S BEEN MUCH MORE CLOSELY TIED TO THE STATUTORY DEVELOPMENT OF MOBILITY FEES AND SO ON. UM MY KIND OF JADED VIEW OF IT, UH, IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE PLANE HERE. SO MOBILITY FEES ARE SUBJECT TO THE SAME CONSTRAINTS AS IMPACT FEES . IT'S WRITTEN RIGHT INTO THE STATUTE BASICALLY, SAYS THE ANALYSIS OF MOBILITY FEES HAS TO BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME DUAL, RATIONAL NEXUS IMPACT FOR THE ANALYSIS. IT BASICALLY INCORPORATES IN ALL THE STUFF FROM 1 63 383. OH, ONE WHAT THE IMPACT THE STATUTE HAS TO MEET DUAL, RATIONAL NEXUS WE DID BASED ON THE MOST RECENT LOCALIZED DATA. IT IS SUBJECT TO THE SAME, VERY SLOW, PROGRESSIVE INCREASE REQUIREMENTS THE LEGISLATURE HAS PUT IN IN RECENT YEARS SO AND TO INCREASE THE MOBILITY FEE. AFTER IT IT ULTIMATELY IS ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL. IT WOULD TAKE ANOTHER STUDY JUST LIKE INCREASING AN IMPACT HE WOULD TAKE ANOTHER STUDY THAT WOULD JUSTIFY RAISING IT BY 10% OR DOUBLING IT OR TRIPLING IT, OKAY. WHAT A JONATHAN CAN ADD ON THIS MORE THE WAY I'VE ULTIMATELY SEEN MOBILITY FEES AS IMPLEMENTED IN THE STATUTE. IT'S KIND OF A STATUTORY HACK TO ALLOW FOLKS TO IMPLEMENT. WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE A TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE, BUT THEN BROADEN THE USES THAT THAT MONEY CAN BE PUT TO OKAY.

AND THAT MAY BE A GOOD OR BAD THING. BUT ULTIMATELY THE SETTING OF THE AMOUNT SO ADDING , YOU KNOW, GOING UP 50% GOING UP 100% WHAT HAVE YOU IS STILL SUBJECT THE SAME CONSTRAINTS.

IT'S GOT TO BE SUBJECT TO DUEL. RATIONAL NEXUS. IT'S GOT TO COME BACK. FOR A VOTE HERE CAN ONLY GO UP VERY SLOWLY OVER A NUMBER OF YEARS PER THE STATUTE. UM ANS AS IMPACT DAYS JUST. YEAH AND WHERE DO YOU ARE CORRECT? UM STUDY IS ACTUALLY. SORRY QUESTION. I HAVE THAT ONE STILL

[00:50:02]

HAS ALREADY BEEN IN PLACE. TROVER YOU KNOW IT'S DONE THE WORK AND THE ANALYSIS OVER THE PAST YEAR. THE FEE IS JUSTIFIED AND DOCUMENTED. IN A 200 PAGE FOR REPORT. IT'S ACTUALLY BASED ON ALL THE PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN FIRED AND LAID OUT. WITHIN INDIAN TOWN. AND THE INTENT IS THAT. IT WOULD REPLACE THE PORTION OF THE COUNTY'S FEE. THE DEVELOPERS WOULD NOT NECESSARILY BE PAYING MORE. TO THE EXTENT THE COUNTY DOES NOT REDUCE THEIR FEE. AND THE VILLAGE ELECTED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE MOBILITY FREE. THEN IT WOULD BE IN ADDITION TO THE COUNTY. BUT WE'RE NOT THERE YET. AND SO THE STUDY THAT'S ALREADY BEEN DONE AND COMPLETED. IS JUSTIFICATION TO REDUCE THE COUNTY CITY. AND THAT AMOUNT THAT IS PREDICTED BN MOBILITY STATE. THANK YOU, JONATHAN SCOTT WATSON. FOR THE RECORD AGAIN, MY CONCERN WOULD BE AND I'M NOT SURE ABOUT THIS MOBILITY PLAN ALLOW. FOR EXAMPLE , WHEN YOU WHEN YOU LOOK AT A IMPACT FEE ON ROADS, YOU STUDY THE TRAFFIC LOAD AND SO ON. AND SO WHEN YOU COME UP AND YOU SAY, OKAY, WE NEED X AMOUNT. DOES THIS ALLOW OTHER THINGS THAN THE IMPACT FEES COVER X. NOW WE'RE SAYING THAT WE CAN APPLY THIS TO A GREATER RANGE OF PROJECTS. POSSIBLY SO IF THIS TOWN COUNCIL WAS TO DREAM UP AND SAY WE NEED 200 MORE PROJECTS IS THEN THIS MOBILITY FEEDING CALCULATED LIKE IT USED TO BE CALCULATED WHAT WE NEED FOR ROADS NOW TO CALCULATE FOR SIDEWALKS, GOLF CART PAST BICYCLE LANES AND TRAILS. DOES THIS ALL COME IN THERE? AND SUDDENLY THAT FEE THAT WE'RE NOW CHARGING HAS A MUCH BIGGER SCOPE AND WHAT WE'RE CALCULATING AS THE AS THE, UH, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COST OR WHATEVER.

THAT'S MY CONCERN. THAT THIS COULD GET OUT OF CONTROL GUYS. THAT'S MY CONCERN, AND I HAVEN'T HEARD I HEARD WHAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT THERE'S STILL THERE'S STILL A NEXUS. YOU GOTTA FOLLOW THAT RAMPING UP. BUT IF THE IF THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECTS ALLOWED TO BE CONSIDERED AND CALCULATED, IS GROSS, SUDDENLY THAT CAN THROW THE WHOLE THING, YOU COULD'VE SAID THAT IMPACT MOBILITY FEE COULD BE OUTRAGEOUS, AND THAT'S WHAT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT. I DON'T SEE THE CONSTRAINT UPON WHAT IS DEFINED THAT CAN BE USED FOR THAT MOBILITY FEE. I'M SURE THERE'S SOMETHING THERE, BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE A WIDE OPEN, UH, DOOR TO ME THAT SOMEBODY'S GONNA DRIVE A BUS THROUGH. IT ACTUALLY IF YOU MEET THE DOCUMENT WHICH IS I BELIEVE AVAILABLE ON THE DOOR. JUST WEBSITE OF THE VILLAGE CAN ARRIVED AT IT DOCUMENTS WHAT THE FEE IS. 50 IS CALCULATED AND IT COMES IN JUST BELOW THE COUNTY'S EXISTING ROAD IMPACT. SO I MEAN, IT'S QUANTIFIED DOES INCLUDE SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES AND OTHER FEATURES AS WELL, BUT IT DOES NOT INCLUDE JUST ROADS LIKE THE COUNTY. BUT IT IS ALL DOCUMENTED AND LISTEN. OUTRAGEOUS EXPEDITION COST. IT'S SOMETHING THAT CAN BE QUANTIFIED , AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IDENTIFIED. AND UNLIKE THE COUNTIES, WHICH WITHOUT GETTING INTO TOO MUCH DETAIL IT'S JUST BASED ON THE COST TO ADD CAPACITY. NOT ANY SPECIFIC PROJECT. INDIAN TOWNS IS ACTUALLY BASED ON SPECIFIC PROJECTS. AND THEY'RE ALL DETAILED IN THAT TECHNICAL REPORT. THANK YOU. BOARD DECIDES TO ADD MORE PROJECTS. OKAY, THANK YOU. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? WHEN MR BOSE. THIS IS AN IMPORTANT POINT . SO THAT'S A I KNOW THE STRUGGLE ON, BUT IT'S I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT AND MISTER WATSON'S ASKING EXCELLENT QUESTIONS ON THIS BECAUSE IT MOBILITY PLANS. UH YOU KNOW AN INTERESTING ANIMAL. HERE'S THE IMPORTANT POINT. THAT'S THAT'S EXACTLY THE SAME AS IMPACT PHASE . UM, ONCE THE FEES SET IMPACT FEE OR APARTMENT. THE MOBILITY FEE. IT'S THAT IF THERE BECAME A DESIRE ON THIS COUNCIL OR FUTURE COUNCIL. WHATEVER AH, THAT MOBILITY PLAN WE HAD DOUBLE THE PROJECTS ON IT. AND WHAT HAVE YOU TWO THINGS WOULD WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN. DOESN'T JUST SAY, OH, HEY, LET'S JUST ADD TO THE PLAN. AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN IT RECALCULATES IN THE FEED GOES UP DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY AT ALL. IT WOULD BE A COUNCIL SAYS YEAH, I'VE LOOKED AT EVERYTHING IN THE MOBILITY PLAN. I WANT TO ADD 50 NEW PROJECTS. OKAY THEN AT LEAST TWO STEPS WOULD OCCUR. FIRST YOU HAVE TO GO GET A CONSULTANT AGAIN TO GO ANALYZE IT ALL AND DO A WHOLE NEW STUDY TO LOOK AT WHAT THAT NEW MOBILITY PLAN WOULD LOOK AT LOOK LIKE, ALL

[00:55:02]

RIGHT, AND THEN THAT'S GOING TO CALCULATE TO A WHOLE NEW MOBILITY FEE THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO EVALUATE. CONSIDER GO THROUGH THE PC A B BECAUSE IT WOULD BE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION. AND, UH AND THEN COME TO THE, UM COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION OF THAT NEW FEE.

OKAY SO IT'S NOT THE FEE DOES NOT SHIFT OR CHANGE BASED ON WHAT YOU POP INTO THE PLANET SPITS OUT A NEW NUMBER. THAT NEW NUMBER LOCKS IN PLACE, JUST LIKE AN IMPACT VAGUE. OKAY? UM SO JUST THE SAME WAY WITH AN IMPACT V IF FOLKS SAID, AH, WELL, WE WANT TO EXPAND THIS OR WE WANT TO EXPAND THAT YOU COULD STILL DO THE SAME PROCESS. IT WORKS VERY SIMILAR SIMILARLY TO THAT, IN THAT RESPECT, SO THIS FEE ONCE IT'S SET WON'T CHANGE UNTIL IT RUNS TO THE WHOLE PROCESS AGAIN TO POTENTIALLY CHANGE IT. AND THEN EVEN THEN, JUST LIKE WITH AN IMPACT, THE UH, EVEN IF I COUNCIL, THIS COUNCIL OR FUTURE COUNCIL WANTED TO DROP A WHOLE NEW BIG, GIGANTIC INCREASE IN THE IMPACT THE RECENT STATUTORY AMENDMENTS MAKE IT HAVE TO GO UP VERY GRADUALLY. SO I HOPE THAT HELPS. I'M NOT SAYING IT GET RID OF ALL THE CONCERNS, BUT I JUST I WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTOOD THOSE PIECES. OKAY THANK YOU APPRECIATE ALL THE CLARIFICATION. UM. AND ALSO IN READING THIS THIS IS JUST AUTHORIZING TO EXTEND TIME. MHM NOT INCREASE PAYMENT. THAT'S CORRECT. THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT IS NOTATED THERE. OKAY? ANYMORE. YEAH. MY QUESTION IS ONCE THIS STUDY IS DONE. FINISHED JUST DONE. WE'RE DONE WITH THE COMPANY. IT'S OURS, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT. MORE FEES.

THERE'S NO IMPLEMENTATION IS NOTHING THAT'S CORRECT. IN MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT STUDY IS DONE. IT'S NOT LIKE WHEN IT IS THAT IT IS CURRENTLY DONE COMPLETED. SO HOW MUCH MORE MONEY DO WE NEED? WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE MONEY, OKAY? OKAY? SO DO WE HAVE EMOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THERE A SECOND? NO SECOND. WE'RE MISSING A COUNCIL MEMBER. DO WE NEED WAIT? JUST A MOMENT COMING. COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ YES. COUNCIL MEMBER. PAOLO? YES.

COUNCIL MEMBER PEREZ. MHM. VICE MAYOR STONE GIVES THOMAS YES. OKAY MOVING ON TO NUMBER EIGHT

[8.

RESOLUTION NO. XXX-2022: A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN PROGRAM; MAKING FINDINGS; AUTHORIZING THE LOAN APPLICATION FOR SRF PROJECT NUMBER CW43033; AUTHORIZING THE LOAN AGREEMENT; ESTABLISHING PLEDGED REVENUES; DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES; PROVIDING ASSURANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.

]

RESOLUTION, MR BOSE. THANK YOU. MAYOR A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, FLORIDA RELATING TO THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN PROGRAM, MAKING FINDINGS AUTHORIZING THE LOAN APPLICATION FOR SRF PROJECT NUMBER C W 43033 AUTHORIZING THE LOAN AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING PLEDGED REVENUES DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. PROVIDING ASSURANCES PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND INEFFECTIVE DATE. YES, MADAM MAYOR. WE HAVE MR DANIEL NEGRO. HE'S OUR SRF CONSULTANT. HE CAN WALK US THROUGH THE PARTICULARS ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM. HI GOOD EVENING. CAN YOU HEAR ME? YOU'RE COMING IN LOUD AND CLEAR. GREAT GREAT. THANKS. I'M STARTING MY VIDEO. OKAY YES. UM SO THIS IS THE NEXT STEP IN THE PROCESS TO, UM, REQUEST THE FUNDING ALLOCATED BY THE SRF DURING THEIR AUGUST FUNDING HEARING FOR THE WASTEWATER PROJECTS. THE FUNDING WAS ALLOCATED. SO NOW IT'S TIME TO FORMALLY SUBMIT THE LOAN APPLICATION. LET'S SAY WHICH INCLUDES THIS RESOLUTION. UM YOU MAY RECALL THE SRF ALLOCATED, UH, $1 MILLION OF WHICH 80% IS PRINCIPAL FORGIVENESS. FOR THIS DESIGN PHASE OF THE WASTEWATER PROJECTS. AND THIS IS STRICTLY DESIGNED PHASE. YES. NO, HONEY.

GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY A COUNCIL MEMBER, HERNANDEZ SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER APOLLO. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? ANYBODY HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON THIS ONE? NOT ON THIS ITEM, MADAM MAYOR, OKAY. IT'S BEEN MOTION TO SPEND SECOND AT ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY MOVING ON TO

[9.

RESOLUTION NO. XXX-2022: A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN PROGRAM; MAKING FINDINGS; AUTHORIZING THE LOAN APPLICATION FOR SRF PROJECT NUMBER DW43034; AUTHORIZING THE LOAN AGREEMENT; ESTABLISHING PLEDGED REVENUES; DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES; PROVIDING ASSURANCES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.

]

ITEM NUMBER NINE RESOLUTION. THANK YOU. MAYOR RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, THE VILLAGE

[01:00:07]

OF INDIAN TOWN, FLORIDA RELATING TO THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN PROGRAM, MAKING FINDINGS AUTHORIZING THE LOAN APPLICATION FOR SRF PROJECT NUMBER DW 43034. AUTHORIZING THE LOAN AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING PLEDGED REVENUES. DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES PROVIDING ASSURANCES PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND INEFFECTIVE DEBT. YES, WE HAVE.

DANIEL NIGRO. DANIEL, IF YOU CAN WALK US THROUGH THIS ITEM, PLEASE. YES OF COURSE. IT IS BASICALLY THE SAME PROCESS AS THE PREVIOUS ITEM, EXCEPT THAT IS FOR THE WASTEWATER SYSTEM.

AND IN THIS CASE, IT IS FOR A CONSTRUCTION LOAN. THE WATER PROJECTS ARE A STEP AHEAD OF THE WASTEWATER PROJECTS. SO THAT'S WHY THE AMOUNT ALLOCATED BY THE SRF WAS $12.6 MILLION LOAN OF WHICH 67% AS PRINCIPAL FORGIVENESS. FOR THIS PROJECT. THAT'S ALL AGAIN RESOLUTION IS NEEDED FOR THE VILLAGE TO FORMALLY SUBMIT THE LOAN APPLICATION TO THE SRM JUST FOR CLARITY. IT'S DRINKING WATER OR OR A WATER TREATMENT, SO IT'S NOT WASTE WHERE I KNOW HE'S AT WASTEWATER, BUT THANK YOU. YES, IT IS DRINKING WATER. OKAY DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS? DO WE HAVE EMOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. WE HAVE EMOTION DESERVES SECOND. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER APOLLO. UM. IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ONE? THIS SIDE OF EITHER MISSED MADAM MAYOR QUESTION. ABSOLUTELY SORRY, MR MAY GROW IT SAYS CONSTRUCTION. HOW WHAT'S THE TIMELINE FOR CONSTRUCTION? ONCE THIS GETS APPROVED AND. SO ONCE THIS RESOLUTION IS APPROVED, WE CAN MOVE QUICKLY TO SUBMIT THE LOAN APPLICATION IN A MATTER OF , UH, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF WEEKS OR SO, UM, IT WOULD PROBABLY TAKE, I WOULD SAY ANOTHER MONTH OR SO TO GET THE LOAN UP THE LOAN AGREEMENT FROM THE SRF SO THAT IT CAN BE SIGNED AND EXECUTED. AND THEN AT THAT POINT, REALLY? UM DISBURSEMENT REQUESTS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO THE SRF FOR YOU KNOW, FOR THIS PROJECT, SO UM, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, I BELIEVE THE VILLAGE IS MOVING FORWARD WITH THE BIDDING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS WATER PLANT PROJECT AS WE SPEAK. UM, SO IT'S SOMETHING THAT SURE WE'LL BEGIN. UH FAIRLY SOON. AS FAR AS, UH GETTING THE PROCESS GOING. AND I JUST WANTED TO THANK STAFF. UM MR MAY GROW AND EVERYONE THAT HAS BEEN DOING THIS BECAUSE I REMEMBER WHEN I FIRST TALKED ABOUT THE WATER COMPANY AND EVERYTHING THEY TOLD ME. THAT WOULD BE YEARS AND YEARS AND WE'RE SEEING IT. ACTUALLY I FEEL LIKE WE'RE IN A RUSH AND HOW STAFF EVEN THOUGH WE'RE LIMITED STAFF, BUT YOU KNOW, YOU GUYS ARE ALWAYS ON ON THIS POINT. SO I THINK THE STAFF MR PATRICK, HIS CREW AND EVERYONE THAT HAVE MADE THIS POSSIBLE BECAUSE IF NOT UM, WE WOULDN'T BE SEEING THIS LIVE UNTIL LIKE PROBABLY INTO I'M LIKE 50 60 YEARS OLD. SO I THINK THAT THIS HAVING THIS PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTION AND WE'LL BE SEEING IT AND PROBABLY A FEW YEARS. IT WILL TAKE A FEW YEARS TO DO ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS. BUT OUR GOAL IS TO HAVE ON THE DECEMBER 8TH AGENDA. THE CONTRACT WITH THE DESIGN FIRM KIM LEE HORN, THAT WILL BE UM WE'RE NEGOTIATING WITH RIGHT NOW. THEY MAKE SOME CHANGE THEIR AGREEMENT AND WE'LL HAVE IT ON THE AGENDA FOR DECEMBER 8TH SO THANK YOU. SO WE HAVE A MOTION. WE HAVE A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR.

[10.

Approval of Purchase of Replacement Water Treatment Plant Blower in the Amount of $37,060.

]

AYE. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 10 APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF A REPLACEMENT WATER TREATMENT PLANT BLOWER IN THE AMOUNT OF 37 60. YES MADAM MAYOR THIS THIS IS THE EMERGENCY ITEM.

PATRICK, IF YOU CAN COME UP AND JUST WALK THE COUNCIL THROUGH IT. GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR BORDEN. NOLAN. FOR THE RECORD. THIS IS A BLOWER FOR THE WASTEWATER PLANT IT THE BLOWER THAT WAS IN PLACE FAILED BACK EARLY SEPTEMBER. WE PUT THE SECOND BLOWER ONLINE AND THAT FAILED FIVE DAYS LATER. SO WE WERE VERY FORTUNATE THAT THE COUNTY HAD ONE. SO WE BORROWED ONE FROM THE COUNTY. WE'VE HAD IT SINCE SEPTEMBER. 5TH OR SIXTH. I BELIEVE WE'RE ABLE TO INSTALL IT AND PUT IT IN OPERATION BLOWER IS INTEGRAL PART OF THE WASTEWATER PLANT. SO WE SOURCED A REMANUFACTURED BLOWER FROM A SUPPLIER IN ORLANDO. IF WE HAD GONE WITH TO THE BRAND NEW BLOWER WOULD HAVE BEEN ABOUT 15 WEEKS TO GET IT. REMANUFACTURED IS EIGHT. AND

[01:05:02]

IT'S ACTUALLY ALREADY BEEN ORDERED. BECAUSE IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO HAVE, AND THEN WE ALSO NEED TO REPEAT. REPLACE OR RETURN THE BLOWER THAT WE BORROWED FROM THE COUNTY. THANK YOU. NICE DAY RIGHT THERE. COUNCIL MEMBER HAND. YES MR ALONE. IT DOES THAT HAVE LIKE WARRANTY. THREE MANUFACTURER. OKAY? VICE BEARISH TONE. WHAT ABOUT THE BACKUP. WE'RE GONNA ONCE WE GET THE NEW ONE IN WE'RE GOING TO TAKE THE OTHER ONE THAT'S THERE AND SEND IT UP THERE AND HAVE IT EVALUATED AND SEE IF WE CAN REBUILD IT. THE ONE THAT WE HAD THAT WE SENT. WE COULD NOT REBUILD. IT WAS TOO FAR GONE. BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THIS ONE ISN'T REBUILD HERBAL AND IF IT ISN'T REBUILD HERBAL, THEN I'LL BE BACK ASKING FOR MORE MONEY FOR ANOTHER BLOWER, BECAUSE WE NEED TO HAVE A BACKUP UNTIL WE GET TO PLANT GOING. THANK YOU. THE BLOWER.

THE WASTEWATER PLANT HERE IN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN IS AN ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT. SO WE HAVE LIVING ORGANISMS AND THE PLANT SO THE BLOWER DOES SEVERAL THINGS FIRST THING IS, IT GIVES THE PLANTS OXYGEN SO THAT THE BIO. TO LIVE IN THE PLANT, BUT THEN ALSO WE USE THE LOWER TO MOVE THE WATER THROUGHOUT THE PLANT. WE DON'T HAVE PUMPS. WE HAVE LIFTS. THAT WE USE THE BLOWER TO LIFT THE WATER. SO IT SERVES MANY PURPOSES IN THE PLANT. THE FIRST ONE LIKE I SAID , IT'S INTERACTIVE. IT'S SUCH POINT KEEPS THE BUGS ALIVE WITHOUT THE BUGS. YOU DON'T HAVE TREATMENT, BUT THEN ALSO WHERE YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO MOVE THE WATER THROUGHOUT THE PLANT WITHOUT THE BLOWER AS WELL. STAY RIGHT THERE. UM. MR BROWN. THE FUNDS ARE GOING TO COME OUT WHERE FOR THAT THESE ARE THIS IS GOING TO COME OUT THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN FUNDS. AND ON DECEMBER 8TH, MADAM MAYOR, I'LL HAVE AN UPDATE ON WHERE WE'RE AT ON THE AARP A FUNDS. ACTUALLY I'M SORRY TO COME OUT OF OUR REGULAR BUDGET. GREAT. OKAY. GOOD. THANK YOU. OKAY? IS THERE ANY. FURTHER COUNSEL COMMENT. IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS? NO MADAM MAYOR. OKAY DO WE HAVE A MOTION HOMEMAKER MOTION? TO APPROVE. MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ SECOND MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER. APOLLO DO WE HAVE SOMETHING ELSE? YES SIR. SHOULD WE JUST GO AHEAD AND DISCUSS? MAYBE IF, UH IF THAT BACKUP IS FAILED, SHOULD WE JUST GO AHEAD AND GIVE THEM PERMISSION TO GO AHEAD AND GET IT NOW? INSTEAD OF THEM HAVE TO COME BACK A MONTH LATER, AND IT'S GOING TO TAKE ANOTHER MONTH. GET IT AS FAR AS THE BACKUP BLOWER GOES. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION IN ORDER TO MAKE A I WON'T KNOW WHAT THE COST IS UNTIL I HAVEN'T EVALUATED. IF WE CAN REBUILD THE ONE THAT WE HAVE IT HOPEFULLY WOULD BE LESS THAN THAT. BUT I WON'T KNOW UNTIL WE HAVE IT EVALUATED SO YOU MAY BE JUMPING LIKE THAT ON THAT. JUST A LITTLE BIT. YEAH. EVEN THOUGH IT'S GOOD . TO BE HONEST, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY YES. JUST GIVE ME A BLOWER FOR YOU. HAVE THIS EVALUATED FIRST WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO COME BACK, WHICH KNOW WHERE WE STAND. OKAY? RIGHT NOW. WE'RE USING THE COUNTY. THE COUNTY'S WALL, RIGHT? YES WE ARE BACK UP FOR A WHILE. THEY WANTED IT BACK WEEK AFTER THEY GAVE IT TO US. OKAY SO WE HAVE A MOTION. WE HAVE A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 11. THAT IS YOUR

[11.

Authorization to Purchase Two (2) Vehicles for the Water and Sewer Utilities Department in the Amount of Approximately $60,000,00.

]

FAIRLY WEAK. ALSO MR BROWN, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. IT'S THE AARP FUNDS. PATRICK, IF YOU CAN TELL US THE REASON WHY WE NEED THESE TWO VEHICLES, THIS IS FOR TWO PICKUP TRUCKS OVER THE WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY. UE EQUIPMENT OVER THERE IS OLD. WE'VE BEEN REPLACING EQUIPMENT SINCE I GOT HERE. AND THIS IS ANOTHER PART OF THAT. WE HAVE TWO TRUCKS. THEY'RE 2004 DODGE RAMPS. THEY HAVE OUTLIVED THEIR USEFULNESS. SO THE PLAN IS TO REPLACE. WE'VE ALREADY REPLACED TWO TRUCKS. WITH THE F ONE FIFTIES, AND THE PLAN IS TO REPLACE TWO MORE OKAY? DO I HEAR A MOTION? MOTION. MOTION MADE BY A COUNCIL MEMBER. APOLLO, IS THERE A SECOND SECOND COUNCIL MEMBER FORRESTER IS ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS? YES YES, MA'AM. PREVIOUS. VEHICLES WERE PURCHASED THROUGH WHAT THE UTILITIES FUN, OKAY, AND THESE ARE THE ONES THAT ARE WE PURCHASED THROUGH THE RP. A YES. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM? NO, MADAM

[01:10:06]

MAYOR. OKAY WE HAVE A MOTION WERE SECONDED ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY MOVING ON TO

[12.

Approval of the 2022 Indiantown Christmas Parade-Applications EV-23-002 and EV-23-003

]

THANK YOU, SIR. THANK YOU APPRECIATE IT. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 12. THE APPROVAL OF THE 2022 INDIAN TOWN CHRISTMAS PARADE APPLICATIONS TO DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS. YES SIR. YES IF I COULD GET MR STEVE KRAMER TO COME UP AND JUST WALK US THROUGH THIS ITEM, IT'S TOO SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS AND A SPONSORSHIP REQUESTS. I BELIEVE SO. GOOD EVENING, MARY AND COUNCIL. OTHER CHAMBERS, ASKING FOR TWO PERMITS TO USE BIG MOUND PARK TO START THE PARADE AND FESTIVITIES THERE ANOTHER PERMIT TO USE POST FAMILY PARK FESTIVITIES WITH A PARADE ENDS. HAVING ROAD CLOSURES WAS REQUIRES COUNCIL APPROVAL. THEY'VE ALSO ASKED FOR A SPONSORSHIP TO THE BARRICADES TO CLOSE THE ROADWAYS. STAFF SUPPORTS THIS. THERE'S SOMEONE FOR THE CHAMBER HERE, ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT THE APPLICATIONS. AND AS FAR AS YOU'RE AWARE, THIS IS HISTORICALLY WHAT THE VILLAGE HAS PARTICIPATED IN THIS EVENT WITH CORRECT THANK YOU. OKAY DO WE? ANYBODY HAVE ANY? I JUST GOT ONE QUESTION. NOT REGARDING THE APPLICATION BUTTON. MR BROWN. IF I DID WE GET THE BARRICADES LIKE DID WE PURCHASE THEM? THE LAST TIME WE, WE'VE WE'VE BEEN. WE'VE BEEN LEASING OR RENTING THIS FROM A COMPANY CALLED BOB'S BARRICADES. UH, WE DID BUY SOME . WE DID BUY SOME CONES AND SOME BARRICADES, BUT I THINK WHAT WE'RE DOING REQUIRES LIKE AN MOT PLAYING LIKE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANE AS PART OF THIS, SO IT'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN JUST PUTTING BARRICADES OUT THERE ON THE STREET. WE HAVE BARRICADES. WE HAVE PURCHASED SOME BARRICADES AND SOME CONES FOR OUR USES. BUT THIS IS SEPARATE FROM WHAT THEIR NEEDS ARE. OKAY.

THANK YOU. AND WE DO HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE CHAMBER. I BELIEVE SHE'S YEAH, SHE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK DONNA CARMEN. WE APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. WELCOME GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME COME AND VISIT THIS EVENING. UM AGAIN, WE THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING OUR REQUEST TO LIVES. BOTH THE PARKS WERE ALSO ASKING FOR FEE WAIVER FOR USE OF THE PARKS BECAUSE THIS IS ONE OF OUR PRIMARY COMMUNITY EVENTS. THAT IS NOT A FUNDRAISER BY ANY MEANS FOR THE CHAMBER. AH IT COSTS THE CHAMBER APPROXIMATELY WITH THE SUPPORT FROM THE VILLAGE AND OTHER SPONSORS ABOUT $8000 JUST TO PUT ON THE PARADE, AS MR BROWN MENTIONED WERE REQUIRED TO HAVE A MODEL. GLOBALIZATION STUDY. TO IDENTIFY WHERE BARRICADES AND OTHER ITEMS GO. UM WE WERE LUCKY THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE TO PAY THE FEE AGAIN BECAUSE WE CAN USE THE SAME MARK PLAN FROM LAST YEAR SO , BUT THE FEES FOR THE BARRICADES IS ABOUT $3500 WAS THE ESTIMATE THAT WE RECEIVED AND WE'RE HOPING THE VILLAGE WILL CONSIDER COVERING THE COST OF THE BARRICADES. I DID A ROUGH ESTIMATE OF 5000 IN MY INITIAL LETTER. THAT'S BEFORE WE HAD GOTTEN ALL THE HARD DATA. ON WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE, AND WE'RE NOT SURE WE DO KNOW THAT THE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT.

THE IS APPROXIMATELY $300 PER PARK. BUT WE DON'T WE'RE NOT SURE WHAT THE PARTS USE FEE. TO USE THE PARK IS GOING TO BE. I THINK YOU GUYS DETERMINED THAT AFTER AN APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED ARE WE'RE NOT REAL SURE WHETHER IT'S JUST FOR RENTAL OF THE GAZEBOS OR ACTUAL PARKING SO WE WERE A LITTLE LOST ON WHAT WE SHOULD BE REQUESTING THERE. THE PARADE IS DECEMBER 3RD. WE WILL STAGE AT LINE UP AT FOUR PM AT BIG MOUNTAIN PARK. WE'LL LEAVE THE PARK AT 5 45.

AND HEAD DOWN INDIAN MOUND, BLAHA. TO OSCEOLA TO POST FAMILY PARK. OUR JUDGES WILL BE STATIONED IN FRONT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICE AS USUAL, AND WE HOPE THAT EVERYONE WILL JOIN US AFTER THE PARADE IN THE PARK FOR COOKIES AND JUICE. SANTA. AWESOME THANK YOU START SAYING QUESTIONS HANGING ON THERE JUST A MINUTE, SO I'LL HAVE TO HAVE DEBBIE ADDRESS THAT QUESTION. UH BUT JUST LET'S BE CLEAR ON WHAT THE REQUEST IS. IT'S FOR THE IT'S $3500 FOR THE BARRICADES AND THEN WAIVER OF THE SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS. AND WHAT WHAT MISS CARMEN PUT IN THE ITEM.

[01:15:02]

WELL, WHEN WE PUT IN THE ITEM IS SHE WAS SHE WAS ESTIMATING WHAT THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS WERE ROUGHLY.

THAT'S WHY SHE SAID 5000 SO. WHAT WE WOULD ASK IS THAT THE COUNCIL, YOU KNOW, WAVE THE PERMIT FEES AND WE WOULD WE WOULD INTERPRET THAT TO MEAN THE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT. BEES AND THE IF THERE ARE ANY PARK FEAST, DEBBIE RESOURCE. WELL YES COUNCIL APPROVED FEES FOR THE USE OF OUR PARKS. IF YOU'RE USING THEM FOR A SPECIAL EVENT WHERE YOU WOULD BE CLOSING IT OFF TO PUBLIC USE, SO THOSE FEES WOULD BE BASED ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT WERE ANTICIPATED TO BE IN THE PARK, AND I WANT TO SAY ROUGH NUMBERS ARE ABOUT $300 PER PARK. OKAY WELL, NOW WHAT IN THE PEOPLE ATTENDING BE THE PUBLIC? SO YOU'RE NOT REALLY CLOSING IT RIGHT? SO I WOULD NEED TO LOOK AT THE VILLAGE COUNCILS PLANS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS AND WHAT WHAT THEY ALLOW IN DON'T ALLOW FOR USE OF OUR PARKS. AND HISTORICALLY, THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE DONE IS WE HAVE SAVED THE PERMANENT MY UNDERSTANDING. YES. OKAY. GOOD. THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE AGAIN.

I GOT SOMETHING. UM SO, MR BROWN, WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE US DO IS TO HAVE LIKE A LIST OF HOW MANY BARRICADES WE GOTTA USE. BECAUSE I'VE BEEN IN THE WHOLE THING IS IF WE CAN BUY THESE BARRICADES AND DONATE THEM TO THE CHAMBER, NOT DONATE, BUT LET THE CHAMBER USE IT FOR THE PARADE ANNUALLY. IT WOULD PROBABLY BE A WHOLE LOT MORE FEASIBLE FOR US TO DO THAT AND KEEP WRITING THESE THINGS FOR $3000 OR WHATEVER IT COSTS. SO WHY DON'T WE USE THAT STUDY AND SEE HOW MUCH WE NEED. AND IT'S I MEAN, EVEN THIS YEAR, IT MIGHT END UP BEING CHEAPER TO DO IT.

YEAH SO LET'S LET'S CONSIDER THAT WE CAN DO THAT. UM I KNOW THERE'S SOME OTHER THINGS THAT ARE AT PLAY. UM, I KNOW WHEN THEY WHEN THEY THIS PLAN OR THIS MOT PLAN. IT HAS A LOT TO DO WITH I DON'T WANT TO USE THAT WORD BUT LIABILITY RIGHT? MRS I'M SAYING LIABILITY BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT I'VE HEARD FROM FOLKS THAT SAY THAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE THIS PLAN IN PLACE IN ORDER TO SAY THAT YOU BLOCKED STREETS OUT STREETS OFF PROPERLY. AND THAT'S PROOF THAT YOU KNOW. THAT THERE WAS AN INDUSTRY STANDARD ON BLOCKING THE STREETS OFF. YOU KNOW, THEY THEY DROPPED THESE.

THEY PLACE THEM BEFORE THE EVENT AND RIGHT AFTER THE EVENT, THEY PICK THEM UP RIGHT AFTER THE EVENT RIGHT AFTER THE EVENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE EVENT, SO UM I MEAN, I DON'T SEE A PROBLEM WITH LOOKING INTO IT AND SEEING EXACTLY WHAT THE COSTS ARE, BUT I DON'T KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT THE MOT PLAN TO BE EDUCATED ENOUGH TO REALLY TALK. YOU KNOW, WITH TALK TURKEY WITH YOU HAVE TO LOOK INTO IT. NO MY WHOLE THING IS, YOU KNOW, WE'RE ABLE TO USE THE SAME PLAN WE USED LAST YEAR, SO THAT'S ONLY 505 $100, RIGHT? IT WAS YEAH, YEAH. YEAH I MEAN, IF WE'RE GONNA USE IT EVERY YEAR, AND WE PROBABLY COULD USE IT FOR OTHER EVENTS, TOO. SO WHY NOT? DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT? DO A COST ANALYSIS. BUT AND THE BUT THEN IN THAT COST ANALYSIS, YOU ALSO HAVE TO GET THAT WHOLE LABOR THING. BECAUSE HE'S TALKING ABOUT PUT THEM OUT BEFOREHAND BEFORE HIM, BECAUSE THAT'S GONNA GO UP AND STORE IT AND ALL THAT WE MIGHT HAVE WE MIGHT WE MIGHT HAVE A PLACE TO STORM. I DON'T KNOW THAT I KNOW THAT THE BOOK APART. BAR STATION IS GETTING KIND OF FULL BIG PART. I MEAN, BIG MOUND PARK. THAT'S AN AWFUL LOT OF BARRICADES. SO I DON'T KNOW. BUT LET'S LET'S DO THAT. AND I CAN REPORT BACK TO YOU GUYS. MAYBE ON DECEMBER 8TH. THANK YOU.

REMINDED ME WHEN MR BROWN MENTIONED THE BARKS DEPARTMENT. WE ARE DOING THE JUMBO CHRISTMAS CARDS AGAIN THIS YEAR FOR ANY BUSINESSES. WE'D LOVE TO SEE YOU BRING YOUR JUMBO CHRISTMAS CARD TO GO IN FRONT OF THE PARK. WE WILL BE DECORATING TREES AGAIN, UM, TO GO ALONG WITH THAT PART.

MISS CARMEN, IF YOU COULD PLEASE HAND ME A COPY OF WHATEVER HE PASSED DOWN TO THE COUNCIL JUST FOR THE RECORD. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. NOW AND JUST IF YOU CAN CLARIFY, THIS IS IF I CAN GET YOU BACK UP TO THE MIKE, IF YOU WOULD PLEASE UM THIS IS ONE OF HOW MANY EVENTS THAT THAT THAT THE CHAMBER AND THE VILLAGE IS ABLE TO WORK TOGETHER ON CURRENTLY. WELL OBVIOUSLY, WE JUST COMPLETED THE RODEO AND WE WISH WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SEE A FEW MORE

[01:20:06]

FACES. I KNOW YOU GUYS ARE ALL BUSY, BUT WHAT WE LOVED RIGHT SEEING MORE OF YOU THERE.

OBVIOUSLY THE RODEO IS ONE THAT WE TRY TO PARTNER WITH ACCOUNT OF THE VILLAGE ON AND MARTIN COUNTY, OBVIOUSLY BECAUSE OF THE PARK. THE CHRISTMAS PARADE. UM SEVERAL OTHER THINGS, YOU KNOW, BEAUTIFICATION PROJECTS. UM YOU KNOW WHAT THIS BILL IS WORKING THROUGH THAT? UM GOSH, WE DID THE BUGGY SHOW, BUT THAT'S NOT REALLY A COMBINATION. THAT'S MORE OR JUST FUNDRAISER, BUT ACTUALLY THE FISHING TOURNAMENT. I'M TRYING TO GO THROUGH ALL OF THE EVENTS THAT WE DO EVERY YEAR, SO AND THE AND THE VILLAGE. HAS BEEN PARTICIPATING WITH THE CHAMBER ON ALL OF THOSE COORDINATION. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IT, SHARING THE INFORMATION, THERE'S VARIOUS WAYS TO PARTNER WITH THE VILLAGE. NOT JUST FINANCIALLY, BUT YOU KNOW, HAVING YOUR SUPPORT AND BACKING OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO IMPLEMENT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.

SO AND WE APPRECIATE IT. YEAH LET ME ASK YOU THIS. THERE'S UM , ONE OF ONE EVENT THAT WE HAVE NOT HAD THAT THE CHAMBER. UM LIKE FOURTH OF JULY. GOD, WE'D LOVE TO DO THAT AGAIN. WE HAD.

WE HAD DISCUSSED THAT INTERNALLY WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION AND WE HAVE DECIDED THAT THE BUGGY SHOW AND BARBECUE WAS NICE, BUT IT JUST DOESN'T HAVE THE LOCAL PARTICIPATION. THAT WE WANT TO SEE WHEN WE DO AN EVENT IN INDIAN TOWN, SO WE WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE FOURTH OF JULY COME BACK. THE JCS DID IT FOR YEARS, AND THEN SISTER TERESA PICKED UP I WOULD LIKE TO GET OUR BUSINESS PARTNERS. NOT JUST A LARGE BUSINESS PARTNERS, BUT ARE SMALLER BUSINESS PARTNERS INVOLVED. IN THE FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION AND HOW FIREWORKS IN INDIAN TOWN AGAIN WE WOULD LOVE TO CONSIDER OR TO WORK WITH THE VILLAGE IN THAT REGARD OF YOUR WELL, LOOK AT IT NOW. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S HUGE COST, AND IT DOES TAKE TIME TO RAISE FUNDS FOR THAT. BUT AND OF COURSE, WE WOULD HAVE TO COME TO THE VILLAGE. FOR A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF IT BECAUSE OVER THE YEARS THROUGH THE JCS AND SISTER CARRIE. AND I'M TALKING 30 YEARS AGO. 20 YEARS AGO AT LEAST IT WAS AROUND 15 $20,000 PRICED OUT. A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO WHEN HE GUYS FIREWORKS WAS ABOUT 32,000 TO DO IT ON THE FOURTH. NOW. IF YOU DO IT ON THE WEEKEND BEFORE. THIS LAST QUOTE WE GOT WAS LIKE 18,000, SO THERE'S A BIG VARIANCE BETWEEN DOING IT ON THE ACTUAL FOURTH OF JULY FOR THESE COMPANIES AND DOING IT ON AN ALTERNATE NIGHT, SO IF YOU GUYS WOULD BE INTERESTED. WE WOULD LOVE TO PARTNER WITH YOU ON THAT. THANK YOU AND I WE HAVE MR WATSON SITTING HERE AND ALL I CAN REMEMBER IS A AS A KID AT THE MARINA AT THE MARINA GOING DOWN AND THEY WERE USED TO BE SO IT HISTORICALLY INDIAN TOWN HAS HAS HAD THE LAST TIME I SAW IT FRESH, I THINK WAS IN 74. YEAH, I DO. SO UM, I WOULD ASK REQUEST THE STAFF TO BRING BACK ON AGENDA ITEM ON DECEMBER THE EIGHTH AND LET'S DISCUSS THE FOURTH OF JULY AND PARTICIPATING WITH THE CHAMBER. AND HAVE ACTUAL FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION IF WE COULD THIS YEAR. SO ON WHAT WE HAVE BEFORE US ON THE CHRISTMAS PARADE APPLICATIONS. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION. MOTION. DO I HAVE A 2ND 2ND? LET ME UNDERSTAND. WHAT ARE WE DOING? SO SO I INTERPRET THAT TO MEAN THAT WE ARE WAIVING. WE'RE PROVING THE SPECIAL PERMITS. WE ARE WAIVING THE FEE FOR BOTH OF THOSE PERMITS. WE ARE WE ARE PAYING FOR THE BARRICADES LIKE WE'VE DONE EACH YEAR, AND THAT ALSO MEANS WE'RE WAVING THE PARK FEES. YEAH ABSOLUTELY. YEAH. OKAY, OKAY.

OKAY, SO MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ HAD VICE MAYOR STONE AHEAD IN MY EAR OVER HERE, SECONDING SECONDING IT. IS THERE ANY OTHER FURTHER COMMENTS? FROM THE DINOSAUR. THE PUBLIC I HAVE NOT, MADAM. THERE OKAY ALL IN FAVOR HIGH. PASSION. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. OKAY, MOVING

[13.

RESOLUTION NO. XXX-2022: A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET; RECOGNIZING CERTAIN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

]

ON RESOLUTION. THANK YOU. MAYOR RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, FLORIDA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021 2022 ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET, RECOGNIZING CERTAIN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DAY. GOOD EVENING, SIR. GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR COUNCIL. GOOD EVENING TONIGHT BEFORE US WE HAVE THE SECOND AND FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 21 22 BUDGET. AH PURSUANT TO FLORIDA'S STATUTES CHAPTER 1 60 60 FINAL BUDGET AMENDMENT SHALL BE APPROVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR.

[01:25:07]

OUR FISCAL YEAR ENDED ON SEPTEMBER 30TH 60 DAYS NOVEMBER 30TH WITH WE ARE WITHIN THAT TIMELINE, UM, JUST TO BE CLEAR, AND I'LL ADD SOME ADDITIONAL NOTES AND COMMENTARY TO THIS.

THIS AMENDMENT IS PREDOMINANTLY OVERWHELMINGLY RELATED TO RECOGNITION OF GRANT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES THAT THE VILLAGE INCURRED IN THE COURSE OF FISCAL YEAR. 22, HOWEVER, THIS IS BUDGET BASIS, AND WHAT I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY ABOUT THAT POINT IS, THE BUDGET HAS A NARROW SCOPE AND TIME IN TERMS OF ITS RECOGNITION. UM, PRINCIPLES, THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF EVERYTHING THAT WE SPENT AND EXPENDED WILL BE IN THE AUDIT, WHICH WILL BE FORTHCOMING AT A FUTURE DATE. BUT THIS IS JUST A SNAPSHOT IN TIME OF THE CURRENT OF THE RECENTLY PASSED FISCAL YEAR THROUGH THE 60 DAYS AFTER FISCAL YEAR END. UM SO STARTING OUT WITH THAT THE GENERAL FUND HERE WHAT WE ARE RECOGNIZING, OR SOME GRANT REVENUES RELATED TO THE F D. O. T SATURDAY. BUS SHUTTLE. UM AND ALSO THE BOOKER PARK DRAINAGE. PROJECT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES THAT WERE INCURRED DURING THE FISCAL YEAR. I DO WANT TO POINT OUT HERE REGARDING THAT TIMELINE AND REVENUE RECOGNITION PERIOD, I DO HAVE ALMOST ANOTHER $900,000 IN EXPENDITURES THAT ARE IN PROCESS OF BEING REIMBURSED BY THE O. T THOSE MONIES WILL NOT BE RECEIVED UNTIL DECEMBER, PROBABLY SOMETIME, POSSIBLY GENERAL BUT HOPEFULLY DECEMBER THAT IS THE REASON WHY THEY ARE NOT IN THIS BUDGET MEMBER. THAT'S THE ONLY REASON BUT THEY WILL BE IN THE AUDIT. SO I JUST LIKE I SAID, THIS IS A FOCUSED TIMELINE. AND THAT IS WHY THIS PRESENTED ACCORDINGLY. UH WE DID HAVE A GRANT RELATED TO THE MOBILITY FEE STUDY FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY THAT WAS RECEIVED $50,000 TOWARDS THAT. AND THEN WE HAD SOME TRANSFERS THAT WERE SCHEDULED TO BE MOVED TO A CAPITAL PROJECT FUND. UM THOSE TRANSFERS DID NOT MATERIALIZE.

THEY WERE NOT EXECUTED. REALLY? I THINK JUST DUE TO LACK OF STAFF AND INABILITY TO EXECUTE THAT PLAN DURING THE COURSE OF THE FISCAL YEAR, WE DID INCUR TRANSFERS IN THE CAPITAL APARTMENT. WE DID INCUR EXPENDITURES THAT WERE CAPITAL RELATED. MOST OF THOSE WERE IN THE GENERAL FUND. WE DID NOT TAKE THE EXTRA STEP OF MOVING THOSE TRANSFERS TO THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUND AS ORIGINALLY PLANNED. AMERICAN RESCUE FUND. UM AS WE KNOW, IN SEPTEMBER OF 2021 NO. PARDON ME. SEPTEMBER OF 20 VILLAGE RECEIVED $3.5 MILLION IN AMERICAN RESCUE FUNDS. THE FIRST INSTALLMENT WAS 1.7 MILLION. WE RECEIVED THE SECOND INSTALLMENT. IN JULY OF THIS YEAR. AH IT WAS REALLY BEST PRACTICE TO ESTABLISH A NEW FUND TO ACCOUNT FOR ALL OF THOSE REVENUES EXPENDITURES ACCORDINGLY, IN A IN A NEW FUND AND FUND NUMBER, 10 HERE, UH THROUGH THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR WE HAVE ONLY EXPANDED $260,000 RELATED TO AMERICAN RESCUE FUND. HOWEVER I CAN TELL YOU THAT COUNCIL HAS APPROVED UP TO THE STATE 1.2 MILLION, THOSE EXPENDITURES WILL ACTUALLY BE INCURRED LATER ON IN FISCAL YEAR 23 AS CERTAIN ITEMS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON ORDER WILL BE RECEIVED. AND VARIOUS OTHER ASPECTS WILL BE COMPLETED. UM AGAIN IN THE LAST FEW WEEKS, FOR EXAMPLE, WE, UH, COUNCIL APPROVED PROJECTS RELATED TO THE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT WITH WATER, MAIN CONFLICTS AND CRANE TRUCK AND SOME OTHER THINGS THAT WE'VE THAT WE'VE ORDERED THAT HAVE YET TO BE RECEIVED. THEY'RE NOT IN THE BUDGET. THEY WILL BE IN A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 23. THE COMMUNITY TRUST FUND ONE. OH, ONE, UM, AGAIN, WE DID NOT HAVE MUCH IN THE WAY OF INTEREST EARNINGS AND THEREFORE WE DID NOT HAVE ANY PROJECTS RELATED TO THE COMMUNITY TRUST FUND. THIS IS JUST SIMPLY AN ELIMINATION. OF THOSE REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES, I THINK IN THE CURRENT YEAR FISCAL YEAR 22 WE HAD MAYBE A LITTLE LESS THAN $1000 IN TOTAL INTEREST EARNINGS . I THINK WE'LL DO MUCH MUCH BETTER THAN THAT, UH, AND FISCAL YEAR 23, BUT BECAUSE WE DIDN'T ACTUALLY HAVE ANY EXPENDITURES RELATED TO THE TRUST. I AM ELIMINATING THAT HERE IN THIS BUDGET AMENDMENT. CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT FUND AGAIN GOING INTO THE FISCAL YEAR WE DID HAVE PLANS FOR VARIOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR SIDEWALKS, ROAD REPAIRS AND SOME SPORTS FIELDS AGAIN. THOSE THOSE PROJECTS DID NOT HAPPEN. WE DID HAVE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE PAID FOR AND EXPENDED IN THE GENERAL FUND , BUT AS THE BUDGET WAS SET UP, THEY WERE TO BE INCURRED IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND. WE DID NOT DO THAT SO THIS BUDGET HERE IN THIS FUND WAS NOT NECESSARY. SO I AM CLOSING THAT OUT WITHOUT ANY TRANSFERS OR RECOGNIZE EXPENDITURES AND THE LAST PIECE OF THIS YEAR IS THE WATER AND SEWER FUND. MOST OF WHAT WE'VE INCURRED HERE THAT IS IN THIS AMENDMENT IS RELATED TO THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN. WE

[01:30:02]

HAD $1.3 MILLION IN MASTER PLANNING ANOTHER DESIGN RELATED COSTS FOR THE SRF FUNDS. UM WE DID ALSO HAVE, UH, SOME GRANT FUNDS FROM D E P RELATED TO SAND AND GRIT REMOVAL, WHICH WAS RECEIVED BACK IN SEPTEMBER. ACTUALLY, THE BEGINNING OF SEPTEMBER. UM SO TOTAL IMPACT THERE OF ABOUT $1.362 MILLION. THE TOTAL ADJUSTMENT ON THE ON THE BUDGET WILL BE 2.553 MILLION TO A TOTAL APPROPRIATION OF 10,000,010 0.4 MILLION AGAIN. ALL OF THIS IS ESSENTIALLY RECOGNITION OF GRANT REVENUES AND PROCEEDS AND EXPENDITURES. THESE ITEMS WERE FALLING OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE ORIGINAL APPROPRIATION. THAT'S WHY THEY'RE IN THE AMENDMENT. UM AND AGAIN, THE FULL THE FULL FINANCIAL ACTIVITY OF THE VILLAGE WILL BE INCLUDED IN FURTHER DELINEATED IN THE UPCOMING AUDIT. SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE ON THE BUDGET AMENDMENT. IS THERE ANYTHING I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS? YOU HAVE THAT COVERED A LOT. YEAH TO DO ALRIGHT. IS THERE ANY? IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COUNCIL? NO NO, NO QUESTIONS. GOOD THANK YOU THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT MADAM MAYOR OKAY? OKAY, SO DO WE HAVE A MOTION? SO MOVE. SECOND. OKAY AND NO DISCUSSION. WE HAVE NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. UM ALL IN FAVOR BY PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

[14.

Consideration of Reading Public Comment Letters into the Record

]

MOVING RIGHT ALONG. ITEM NUMBER . 14 YES, MADAM MAYOR. ITEM NUMBER 14 IS CONSIDERATION OF READING. PUBLIC COMMENT LETTERS INTO THE RECORD ON SEPTEMBER 22ND. WE HAD A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT. IT WAS CONSENSUS OF THE COUNCIL THAT IS REPLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. AND THAT'S WHAT THIS ITEM IS BEFORE YOU. OKAY SO ACTUALLY, WE'RE TALKING AN ACTUAL MOTION AND YES, IN A SECOND AND ABOUT OKAY? SO. CONSIDERATION OF READING PUBLIC COMMENT LETTERS INTO THE RECORD.

DO WE HAVE? A MOTION MAKE SOMETHING TO CONSIDER. AND THAT MOTION CONSISTS OF WHAT.

APPROVING COMMENTS, LETTER COMMENT LETTERS INTO THE RECORD ALLOWING IT YES, ALLOW IT. OKAY? DO WE HAVE A SECOND? UH, ALL SECOND AMENDING IF COUNCILWOMAN IS OKAY WITH AMENDING IT, MAKING SURE THAT THIS WHOEVER SENT IN A LETTER PUT THEIR NAME ON IT. HMM. IF THERE ARE RESIDENT OR NOT, AND THEIR PHONE NUMBER AND THEIR PHONE NUMBER AND ALSO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S WITHIN THREE MINUTES 11. UH I AM IN MY MOTION. SECOND. OKAY TO WALMART TO MAKE SURE IT'S VERY CLEAR EXACTLY WHAT ALL THAT ENTAILS. SO THE MOTION WAS MADE TO APPROVE READING INTO RECORD. A LETTER RECEIVED AND SIGNED. BY A RESIDENT. WHO HAS ALSO INDICATED THEIR TELEPHONE NUMBER. GETTING ALL THIS. I DON'T KNOW THE TELEPHONE NUMBER ONE WHO SAID THE TELEPHONE NUMBER WHATEVER SIGNATURE CARD. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE COMMENT CARD IT'S OPTIONAL FOR EMAIL ADDRESS AND ANY CONTACT INFORMATION. IT'S ONLY THERE IN THE CASE THAT WE NEED TO CONTACT THE PERSON TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THEY HAVE. BUT IT IS OPTIONAL. OKAY? BUT THEY HAVE TO PUT THEIR THEIR ADDRESS, RIGHT? NO, JUST THEIR NAME AND WHAT ITEM THEY WANT TO SPEAK ON. THE REST OF THE STUFF IS OPTIONAL. I WOULD LIKE AT LEAST IN THE EMAIL. OKAY SO AMENDING IT TO INCLUDE INSTEAD OF PHONE NUMBER, EMAIL ADDRESS. HOWEVER COUNCIL MEMBER OR VICE MAYOR STONE ONE. BASICALLY FOLLOWING FORM. YES. OKAY SO FOLLOWING THE FORM WOULD BE FOLLOWING THE FORM DOES NOT INCLUDE CONTACT INFORMATION. FOLLOWING. DON'T SO WHEN A PERSON COMES UP HERE, BUT WHEN A PERSON COMES IN, ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS FILL OUT THEIR NAME. WHAT ITEM THEY WANT TO SPEAK ON . AND IF THEY WANT US TO CONTACT THEM AFTERWARDS, THEN THEY GIVE US THEIR CONTACT. INFORMATION COUNCIL GAVE US A DIRECTIVE WHILE BACK TO SIMPLIFY THESE FORMS, AND THAT'S HOW WE DID SO.

SO I WOULD SAY THEY HAVE TO DO IT JUST IN CASE IF YOU NEED TO CONTACT THEM SINCE THEY'RE

[01:35:01]

SENDING IN A LETTER BUT THEY DON'T THEY DON'T HAVE TO BE READ IN THE RECORD. OKAY, SO DON'T READ THE EMAIL ADDRESS, BUT JUST HAVE THE EMAIL ADDRESS IN THE LETTER SOMEWHERE AND PHONE NUMBER. BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE RIGHT INTO RECORD. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECAUSE. IT IS ON THERE.

IT WILL BE A PART OF THE RECORD. IT WILL BE A PART OF THE RECORD. I'M SORRY. YOU OK? COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ WITH PHONE AND EMAIL ADDRESS. IT'S JUST TOO HARD LIST IF THEY IF THEY DON'T WANT IT, THEN EITHER, OR NO, NO, I SAY DO IT. AND IF THEY DON'T WANT TO DO PUT IT ON THERE, AND THEN THEY COME IN. OKAY, THERE YOU GO. SHORTENED THE LIST. SO LET ME MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE MOTION IS. APPROVED. READING INTO RECORD. A. LETTER THAT HAS BEEN SIGNED. WITH THE NAME WITH. CONTACT INFORMATION THAT INCLUDES EMAIL AND PHONE. AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY'RE A RESIDENT IS WHAT I HEARD. DO WE STILL WANT THAT? YES. AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE A RESIDENT. THAT IS THE MOTION. AND THAT THE LETTER B WITH HIM. THREE MINUTES IS ALSO WHAT I HEARD. WITHIN THREE MINUTES. SO IF I GET A FIVE READING IT IF I GET A FIVE PAGE LETTER, I WILL PROVIDE THAT TO THE COUNCIL SEPARATELY, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THAT CAN BE READ IN THREE MINUTES. RIGHT? OKAY. SO IS THAT IS THAT THE MOTION? COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ. YES. AND YOU SECOND THAT MOTION. OKAY? SO IS EVERYBODY UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MOTION IS? DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION? ACCOUNTING. YES. SCOTT WATSON. MAYOR HANG ON BEFORE MR WATSON SPEAKS. I JUST WANT TO GET ONE LITTLE BIT OF CLARIFICATION ON THAT WE SAID SIGNED STUFF COMMONLY COMES IN BY EMAIL. DO REMAIN SIGNED BY SIGNED HAVING THEIR NAME ON THERE. JUST JUST PRINTING IT. YOU MEAN JUST PRINTING THEIR NAME? THAT'S WHAT I TAKE FROM IT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO THAT'S WHAT I WAS TAKING TOO. I'M NOT SAYING ANY OBJECTION TO THAT SECTOR, OKAY? MY CONCERNS WOULD BE. ONE LIMITED TO RESIDENTS COULD BE A BUSINESS OWNER AND SO ON AND SO FORTH, BUT THERE'S ANOTHER BIG CONCERNS. SOMEBODY COULD WRITE A VERY DEFAMATORY LETTER AND YOU'RE STATING THAT YOU'RE GOING TO READ IT INTO THE RECORD, AND THAT COULD BE INTERPRETED THAT WAY THAT NO MATTER WHAT IT SAYS YOU'RE GONNA READ IT. IN THE RECORD. WE'VE HAD INSTANCES THAT HAVE HAPPENED, WHETHER ANONYMOUS OR OTHERWISE, LETTERS WERE DISPERSED OR READ INTO THE RECORD, SO OBVIOUSLY IT'S GOT TO BE SIGNED, BUT SIGNED BY WHO I MEAN I COULD WRITE A FAKE LETTER AND SEND IT IN. IF IT'S DONE BY EMAIL OFFICE, THERE'S AN EMAIL ADDRESS TO TRACK IT BACK TO, BUT I THINK THAT NAME ADDRESS. YOU KNOW, YOU CAN CONFIRM WHO YOU'RE DEALING WITH HERE, AND IF SOMETHING COMES IN, IT'S OUTRAGEOUS THERE NEEDS SOMEONE NEEDS TO. YOU KNOW IF THEY MAKE DEFINE MATORI REMARKS ABOUT ARE YOU GOING TO READ THAT INTO THE RECORD? I'D BE A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT THAT, UH, IT'S 11 WHEN SOMEONE STANDING HERE THAT'S ONE THING YOU KNOW WHO I AM. YOU KNOW WHO THE PEOPLE ARE THAT YOU'RE TALKING TO, BUT I WOULD JUST CAUTION YOU ON THAT I THINK ABOUT THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF THIS, BUT I THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE. THAT LETTER SHOULD BE READ AND RECORD RECORD IN CERTAIN INSTANCES IF A PERSON'S PROPERLY IDENTIFIED AND SO ON AND SO FORTH, BUT BE A LITTLE CAREFUL SAYING WE'RE GONNA READ ANYTHING INTO THE RECORD. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS ON THIS? I DON'T THINK THEY SHOULD BE RIGHT. AND I THINK THEY SHOULD JUST BE, UH POSTED RIGHT? REDACTED IF THEY NEED TO BE REDACTED. AND. IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO SAY SOMETHING BAD ENOUGH, THEY NEED TO COME HERE AND STAND HERE AND SAY IT. NO. I'M AGAINST IT. AND EXCITING. UNTIL YOU'VE BEEN A SUBJECT. OF A LETTER.

THERE IS THE FLAME A TORREY. AND TOTALLY, TOTALLY, TOTALLY GET THE WRONG. GOT IT WRONG. I SHOULD BE ABLE TO KNOW WHO THAT IS. I SHOULD BE ABLE TO SUE THAT PERSON. AND IF I EVER FIND OUT WHO IT IS, I HAVE A TEAM OF LAWYERS WAITING. SO UNTIL YOU'VE BEEN A SUBJECT OF THAT YOU CAN SAY SIT HERE AND SAY READ THEM, READ THEM INTO RECORDS. I'M NOT FOR IT. I COULD WRITE A LETTER.

I CAN WRITE A LETTER ON ANYBODY AND JUST SEND IT IN ANONYMOUS AND SAY YEAH, I CAN SAY WHATEVER I WANT. AND. YOU'RE GOING TO PUT A PERCEPTION OUT THERE BECAUSE SOMEBODY IS GOING TO BELIEVE IT.

OKAY. YOU PUT A PERCEPTION OUT THERE. THAT I THINK WE'RE BIGGER THAN THAT. I REALLY DO. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. COUNCIL MEMBER HER NEW DAY. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THAT LETTER THAT YOU'RE

[01:40:09]

MENTIONING WAS NEVER. PUT ON PUBLIC RECORD. IT WAS SENT TO US INDIVIDUALLY AND PUTTING OUR MAILBOXES. OKAY? EXCUSE ME. THAT LETTER CAME THROUGH THIS VILLAGE HALL WAS STAMPED IN AND PUTTING EVERY COUNCIL MEMBERS MAILBOX. SOMEBODY DOESN'T HAVE THE GUTS ENOUGH TO STAND IN FRONT OF ME AND TELL ME THEY DID IT. SO THAT WAS IT WASN'T A PUBLISHED PUT IT ON. FACEBOOK. A WORD WAS NEVER EVEN READ IT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU KNOW I CAME THROUGH THIS OFFICE. IT WAS STAMPED TIMESTAMP THROUGH THIS OFFICE. CORRECT BUT JUST TO CLARIFY AND MAKE THE RECORD REFLECT. YOU DIDN'T MAKE IT PUBLIC, OR IT DIDN'T BECOME PUBLIC PUBLIC RECORD UNTIL YOU MENTIONED IT BEFORE THEN IT WAS NOT. HE WAS NEVER MENTIONED IN A PUBLIC MEETING. IN REGARDS OF WHATEVER BUSINESS IT WAS OR THAT LETTER MENTIONED, UM AND I'M NOT DEFENDING BECAUSE I REALLY DON'T CARE. WHAT I SAID. BUT. JUST YOU KNOW, THIS IS A WORKING CLASS COMMUNITY. SOMETIMES PEOPLE DON'T HAVE TIME TO COME. TO THESE MEETINGS. I THINK I'VE HAVING THEIR ADDRESS AND HAVING THEIR NAME OUT THERE IF LET'S JUST SAY MS RAINIER PRESSLER WAS SOMEWHERE OUT. YOU KNOW SHE HAD AN EMERGENCY AND SHE FELT REALLY PASSIONATE ABOUT SOMETHING AND SHE COULDN'T MAKE IT. HOW HOW WOULD SHE MAKE US KNOW HER FEELINGS? IF SHE WASN'T SHE HAD AN EMERGENCY. SO I'M JUST TRYING TO MAKE THIS EASIER. BUT IF THE COUNCIL YOU KNOW? COUNCIL DOESN'T WANT TO. IT'S FINE WITH ME. IT'S THE PLEASURE TO COUNSEL BUT I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT. THAT LETTER WAS NEVER READ INTO THE RECORD. COUNT COUNCIL MEMBER PEREZ. YOU KNOW WE'RE DISCUSSING THIS BUT DO OTHER PLACES, READ LETTERS IN THE PUBLIC? CORAL SPRINGS DOES. THAT'S ONE BUT I'M JUST SAYING, YOU KNOW. WE'RE READING LETTERS. LET THEM IF THEY HAVE CONCERNS, WHY DO THEY EMAIL US INDIVIDUALLY? INSTEAD OF READING IT OUT LOUD. WE'RE TRYING TO MOVE THE MEETING ALONG. JUST THAT'S JUST MY TWO CENTS. YES. OKAY UM, PUBLIC COMMENT. MADAM MAYOR. OKAY ABSOLUTELY. LET'S DO THAT. AND I'LL MAKE MY COMMENT AND WE NEED A PRESSLER. BY GRENADA PRESSLER. FOR THE RECORD , I THINK YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT EXPEDIENCY IS MISPLACED. WE HAVE A COMMUNITY HERE THAT OFTEN WORKS LATE. IT'S HARD TO PARTICIPATE AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE NUMBER OF EMPTY CHAIRS. WE HAVE. I THINK THERE IT'S YOU SHOULD DO AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. TO ENCOURAGE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN EVERY WAY. THEY'RE PUTTING WHAT THEY'RE SAYING DOWN ON PAPER. THEY'RE PUTTING THEIR NAME ON IT. IT'S THERE. UM WHAT YOU HAVE. HERE IS A LONG HISTORY OF 60 YEARS OF NOT BEING ABLE TO PARTICIPATE, NOT HAVING A GOVERNMENT AT ALL. UM THIS IS STILL SOMETHING THAT'S NEW FOR RESIDENTS HOW TO PARTICIPATE. SO I THINK YOU SHOULD DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN TO ENCOURAGE RESIDENTS. WE HAVE FAR TOO MUCH. UM I FEEL LIKE RESIDENTS ARE ALREADY BEING OVER , SHADOWED BY NONRESIDENTS ALREADY. AND, UM. ANYWAY, ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO ENCOURAGE RESIDENTS AND MAKE IT EASY FOR THEM. WOULD BE THE RIGHT CHOICE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IT'S OKAY.

DONNA CARMEN. MY APOLOGIES. I DO WANT TO INDICATE ONE LITTLE THING JUST FOLLOWING UP ON CARMINE'S COMMENT. JUST BE CAREFUL. GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE DOORS BOX. IT WILL COME BACK AND HURT YOU. PERSONALLY, I'M JUST SAYING BUT I BELIEVE IN WHAT WE NEEDED, SAYS PUBLIC COMMENT AND OPENNESS IS IMPORTANT. UM OUR MEETINGS RIGHT NOW. IT'S A LITTLE AFTER EIGHT.

ALMOST 8 30. SO THERE IS TIME FOR RESIDENTS, EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE WORKING LATE TO COME TO SOME OF THESE MEETINGS. IT WAS IMPORTANT TO YOU. YOU WILL BE HERE YOU'LL MAKE YOUR TIME IF

[01:45:01]

YOU'RE ABLE TO COME OFF WORK. AGAIN THEY NEED TO EMAIL EACH OF YOU. YOU NEED TO GET OUT AND TALK TO THE CONSTITUENTS. HEAR THEIR INFORMATION AND BRING IT BACK TO THIS PUBLIC MEETING. BUT JUST BE CAREFUL. LIKE I SAID, WHEN YOU OPEN UP PANDORA'S BOX. SOME OF THOSE NASTY LETTERS THAT ARE GOING TO COME IN HERE. AND HURT YOUR FEELINGS. EVERY ONE OF YOU IN THIS ROOM. YOU'LL REGRET LATER, JUST SAYING THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THAT ALL PUBLIC COMMENT THAT WE HAVE MADAM MAYOR? UM. AND A LITTLE BIT OF WHAT EVERYBODY ELSE HAS SAID IT IS NOT A NORMAL PRACTICE. AND YOU KNOW, 60 YEARS OF NOT BEING ABLE TO PARTICIPATE AND HAMMERING AWAY HOW DO YOU GET PEOPLE TO PARTICIPATE AND THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO COME EMAIL. EVERY COUNCIL MEMBER AND STAFF MEMBER HAS AN EMAIL OUT THERE. THAT PEOPLE ARE ABLE TO EMAIL AND MAKE THEIR VOICE HEARD OUR PHONE NUMBERS OF OURSELF VILLAGE CELL PHONES. ARE OUT THERE. CALL US THEY CAN PARTICIPATE. IT'S NOT LIKE WE'RE TRYING TO, UM QUIET. ANYBODY'S VOICE. WE DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO GET PEOPLE TO PARTICIPATE AND LET US KNOW AND CALL US. I THINK THIS IS A PANDORA'S BOX. IT IS NOT NORMAL PROCEDURE AND IN VERY EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES. I THINK AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE HAD, AND THAT'S HOW IT STARTED TO BEGIN WITH. UM IS HOW THAT STARTED WAS EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES AND WE HAVE COME OUT OF THAT TIME AND WE ARE MOVING ON. AND THAT IS THE REASON. I THINK THAT, UH THIS CAME ABOUT GOING BACK TO SOME NORMALCY. SO WE HAVE A MOTION.

IT HAS BEEN JUST WANTED TO RESCIND MY MOTION. JUST TAKE IT OFF TO THANK YOU. OKAY SO WE HAVE NO MOTION. ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? OCEAN, NOT I MAKE A MOTION. TWO. THAT PEOPLE WANT TO SEND A LETTER GOT TO BE A RETURN ADDRESS ON THE ENVELOPE. THAT'S PART OF THE RECORD. AND IT BE POSTED ONLINE FOR ANYBODY TO READ THAT WANTS TO READ IT. ANYTHING THAT'S IN THIS DEROGATORY OF DEFAMING TO ANYBODY. NEEDS TO BE REDACTED. AND, UM THAT WAY, PEOPLE HAVE THEIR VOICE. BUT TO SIT HERE AND READ LETTERS THAT COME IN HERE WITH NO NAME ON IT. WE CAN'T DO THAT. WE CAN'T DO IT. SO JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, COUNCIL MEMBER APOLLO YOU'RE SAYING THAT THEY CAN SEND IN A LETTER THAT WILL BE READ INTO OR WILL NOT BE RIGHT. IT'LL BE POSTED. OKAY.

THANK YOU FOR CLARIFICATION. AND JUST FOR THOSE LETTERS THAT I RECEIVED THAT DO NOT HAVE A RETURN ADDRESS. AM I STILL POSTING THOSE ONLINE? NO. SOMEBODY SENDS YOU. A LETTER DOES NEVER RETURN ADDRESSES. JUST YOU CAN FILE IT, OKAY? THANK YOU. SO EMOTION. TO ACCEPT LETTERS POST THEM ONLINE. BUT NOT READ INTO RECORD THEY ARE ONLINE AND ON RECORD. AM I HEARING THAT CORRECTLY? YES. OKAY? DO I HAVE A SECOND FOR THAT MOTION? OKAY SO DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS MOTION? ANY PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON THIS MOTION. I HAVE NO FURTHER. OKAY? NEVER MIND. OKAY SO WE'RE GOOD. WE HAVE A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THAT MOTION. COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE MOTION OF THE LETTER IS RECEIVED. IT MUST HAVE A RETURN ADDRESS POSTED ONLINE. IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT IS DEROGATORY, IT IS TO BE REDACTED. AND SO IT WILL NOT BE READ AND RECORD. OKAY, THANK YOU SO MUCH. OKAY LET'S DO A LET'S DO A REAL CALL VOTE FOR THIS PLACE. YES I'M SORRY. CLARIFY SOMETHING FOR UM WE COULD PROBABLY MUSTER. RID ACTING FOR WHAT'S POSTED ON THE INTERNET. KEEP IN MIND THAT, UH, IT WILL

[01:50:05]

REMAIN A PUBLIC RECORD. AND IF ANYBODY SEES ANY REDACTIONS THERE, THEY CAN REQUEST THE UNREDACTED VERSION. YES, SIR. JUST LET EVERYBODY KNOW. QUEST. YEAH, WHICH THEY PROBABLY WILL.

YEAH. OKAY LET'S DO A REAL CALL VOTE. COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER TO APOLLO.

YES, COUNCIL MEMBER PEREZ. YES, VICE MAYOR STONE. YES GIBBS. THOMAS? YES. OKAY MOVING ON ITEM 14 14 B S APPROVAL. I'M SORRY WE ARE WE AT 15 OR WE AT 14. B B. THAT'S RIGHT. OKAY, YEAH. THAT'S OUR ADJUSTED. SORRY, MAYOR. I'M HAVING TROUBLE COMPUTER. PETER DIED. GOTTA LAUGH. ELEKTRONIK NO. JUST GET TO THAT. IT IS THE APPROVAL OF THE STANDARD GRAIN AGREEMENT FOR INDIAN TOWN.

WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF 18 MILLION. YES MADAM MAYOR, AS YOU RECALL, WE HAD, UM, WE WORK WITH, UM. GARCIA PROPERTY GROUP , KEVIN POWERS AND OTHERS TO HELP PUT TOGETHER THIS APPLICATION THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE STATE. AH IN OUR AND IT WAS SUBMITTED AND WE WERE FUNDED $18 MILLION. AND SO THIS IS A GRANT THIS WE'RE ASKING THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVED THIS GRANT AGREEMENT AMOUNT OF $18 MILLION SO WE CAN START AH, FUNDING SOME OF THE WORK. UM SOME OF THE WORK THAT WILL BE DOING AND SO THAT'S WHY WE ASK THAT THIS BEAT THAT THIS BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA LATE SO WE CAN GET THE GRAND AGREEMENT BACK TO THE STATE WILL TAKE A FEW MONTHS TO GET THAT GOING. SO OKAY? I'LL MAKE A MOTION. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE. A SECOND HAS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DEPAULO IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS. ANY PUBLIC DISCUSSION. NO, MADAM. THERE. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE. PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON TO ITEM

[15.

ORDINANCE NO. XX-2022: AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE VILLAGE OF INDIANTOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO ESTABLISH VEHICLE PARKING REGULATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH RESIDENTIAL USES; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Application No. LDR-22-025)

]

NUMBER 15. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES. THANK YOU, MAYOR. NORTHERN'S OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO ESTABLISH VEHICLE PARKING REGULATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH RESIDENTIAL USES, PROVIDING FOR QUANTIFICATION CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. APPLICATION NUMBER. LD R DASH 22-25 BEFORE YOU TONIGHT ON FIRST READING. YES, STEPHEN KRAMER. STEVE KRAMER. FOR THE RECORD. I JUST HAVE A VERY, VERY PRESENTATION TO SUMMARIZE WE'RE ABLE TO SEE APPLICATION. IN OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR, THE COUNCIL DISCUSSES IN SOME DETAIL. AND THEY GAVE DIRECTION BASED ON PUBLIC INPUT. OTHER DIRECTION WAS TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE TO HAVE A MAXIMUM WEIGHT OF VEHICLES AND NEIGHBORHOODS OF £26,000 GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT, SO THEY WEREN'T AS DOES DO THAT. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. AND BEFORE YOU ARE EXAMPLES OF VEHICLES THAT WOULD MEET THOSE THRESHOLDS. THESE TWO VEHICLES WILL BE LESS THAN £26,000. IT WOULD ALSO INCLUDE BOX TRUCKS IS MR STONE ASKED ABOUT NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE? THESE ARE EXAMPLES OF VEHICLES THAT WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO NEIGHBORHOODS BECAUSE OF THEIR EXCESSIVE WEIGHT OVER OUR THRESHOLD. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, MA'AM.

THAT LAST SLIDE, OKAY? NOW THAT THAT CEMETERY THEORIES BOBTAIL IS HE MORE THAN EXCEEDS MORE THAN £26,000? YES, MA'AM. EVEN THE BOBTAIL MY UNDERSTANDING. HMM. THE BOBTAIL. SUSAN, IS THAT THE ONE ON THE RIGHT HERE? YES, THAT'S THE ONE THAT IS NOT HAVE A HE'S JUST THE CAB. JUST THE SEMI ITSELF. IT'S NOT WITH A TRAILER. SO I WOULD THINK YOU KNOW. WHEN YOU'RE BOBTAIL LIKE THAT YOU'RE FOR TALKING IMPACTING RESIDENTIAL ROADS. AND APPARENTLY, THAT'S WHAT THIS IS.

THIS IS WHAT IT'S ABOUT. I WOULD HAVE TO. SOMETHING TO ME THAT RIGHT THERE JUST NOT IT ABOUT ON THE SAME VEIN AS THE OTHER. WE'RE TALKING THE BOX TRUCK AND THE AND THE OTHER THINGS. I CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT THE TRAILER BUT I WOULD HAVE TO GET VERIFICATION OF A AND BOBTAIL SEMI THE WEIGHT OF IT. IT IS THE CLASS SEVEN. IT'S A IT'S ABOVE 26,000. YEAH WOW. OKAY. INTERESTING. THE

[01:55:11]

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THE ORDINANCE, THE PLANNING BOARD CONSIDERED THIS ON SEPTEMBER 1ST OF THIS YEAR. THEY HAVE ALSO RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. THE COUNCIL HAS TWO OPTIONS, AND I HAVE TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE ON FIRST READING OR TO DENY IT. WAS APPROVED OF YOUR SECOND READING THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND IF ADOPTED THE REGULATIONS BEING AFFECTED IMMEDIATELY. AND THOSE ARE MY CONGRESSMAN. MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU, SIR. DO WE HAVE? DO WE HAVE A MOTION? SO MOVE.

SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE WHILE I SMEAR STONE SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ. MAYOR YES, SIR. I ACTUALLY. I DID THE REWRITES ON THIS ORDINANCE. AS I LOOK AT IT FURTHER, I THINK WE CAN SIMPLIFY THE EVEN FURTHER. TO SAY PRECISELY WHAT STEVE JUST SAID. THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL SENTENCE IN HERE THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES, TRACTOR TRAILERS, SEMI TRAILERS AND SEMI TRACTORS SEPARATE APART FROM THE GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT PIECE. UM I THINK THAT ADDITIONAL SENTENCE CAN COME OUT. AND SO IT JUST STRAIGHT UP GOES TO THE GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER COMPLICATIONS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. DID OTHER REWRITES ON IT, AND I THINK I WAS MISSING THAT ONE JUMP RIGHT OUT AT ME. SO I'D ACTUALLY RECOMMEND THAT THE MOTION THAT IT BE AH APPROVED ON FIRST READING WITH THE ELIMINATION OF TWO OH TWO. THE SECOND SENTENCE IN THERE, ALL RIGHT? SO THE MOTION. FIRESTONE AMENDED ACCORDING TO OKAY, WE'RE GOOD SECONDING THEN, OKAY? OKAY? SO IS THERE ANY FURTHER COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENT? ON THIS ONE. ISC COMMENT? NO MATTER MATTER, HAD TO LEAVE THE ROOM EVERY MINUTE. BUT, UH, UM, I THINK WE NEED TO MAKE SOME EXCEPTIONS. OKAY I'VE BEEN THINKING ABOUT THIS. UM THE GUY THAT HAS A BOBTAIL TRACTOR.

NEEDS TO BE EXCEPTION. I FAMILY BOUGHT A HOUSE IN THE VILLAGE. I WANT TO PARK MY BUS. ON MY PROPERTY. MY BOSS IS £40,000. ALRIGHT, SO I THINK WE HAVE TO HAVE EXCEPTIONS MAY BE YEAH.

RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. BOSS MOTORCOACH. UM A TRACTOR. AND I'M SURE OTHER INSTANCES OTHER THINGS WILL COME UP AS AS WE GO ALONG. ANYBODY ELSE? WELL I'LL SAY SOMETHING MEAN SO, UM AH! I HAVE SEEN ORDINANCES. THAT DUDE WHAT THE COUNCIL MEMBER JUST SAID. AND BUT THEIR OWN PROPERTIES THAT HAVE ENOUGH ROOM FOR THEM TO DO IT. YOU KNOW, THE PARK THAT OVERSIZED VEHICLE ON SOME OF THESE PROPERTIES. THE ONE IN PARTICULAR THAT I'M THINKING ABOUT IS THE ONE THAT WE'VE HAD. IT'S A CHRONIC CODE VIOLATION THAT WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH OVER IN THE BOOK OF PARK YOUR YEAR, THERE'S A BOBCAT. TRUCK. UM, THAT'S THERE, AND IT'S PARKED. AND PARKING SPACES THAT ARE WITHIN THE RIGHT AWAY TAIL. I'M SORRY, BOB TILL THE BOBTAIL TRUCK, BUT IT'S PART IT'S PART IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY, NOT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND SO, UM. SO UM, YOU KNOW, MAYBE NOW THIS BRINGS UP A WHOLE DIFFERENT PROCESS FOR ME BECAUSE YOU ARE L D R S ALLOW AND RESIDENTIAL FOR A. TRAVEL TRAILER, A COACH ON RV. YOU ARE . L DRS LIMIT THAT IN SOME WAY, OR IS IT ALLOWABLE? THAT WOULD BE THE NEXT QUESTION THAT'S INTERESTING. NOT SPEAK RVS AND TRAVEL TRAILERS. BUT, UM. BECAUSE I DON'T. I DON'T KNOW, MAYOR AND I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I DO KNOW I'M JUST TRYING TO GET JUST TRYING TO WRITE THIS. YOU KNOW, BOB BOBTAIL. TRUCK. BEING ON A PIECE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY. IF THE PERSON HAS PROPERTY THAT CAN THAT THEY'RE ABLE TO PARK ON

[02:00:06]

IT, THEN THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DISCUSS. BUT IT'S GOING TO BE IF THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO PARK ON THEIR PRIVATE PROPERTY, THEN THEY'RE PART OF OUR PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND IT'S PROBLEMATIC.

YOU KNOW, WE'VE BEEN DOING THE BOOK OR PART DRAINAGE PROJECT RIGHT NOW, AND A LOT OF FOLKS ARE USED TO PARKING IN ON THE RIGHT AWAY, AND WE HAD TO DIG THOSE STRANGE DITCHES AND SO THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD ADD TO. THIS IS THAT IF YOU DO MOVE FORWARD WITH HAVING PARKING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT THE PUBLIC RIGHT AWAY. IT NEEDS TO BE OPEN AND CLEAR FOR THE VILLAGE AT SOME POINT, EITHER NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. ABLE TO MAKE THOSE IMPROVEMENTS. UH OR ANY OF THAT, SO MAYOR. YES SIR. I HAD TO REMIND MYSELF ON THIS BECAUSE I KNEW WE HAD ADDRESSED IT IN THE L D. R S, UM THERE. OUR REGULATIONS. UM THE COMMERCIAL STORAGE AND BY THAT I MEAN, STORING A BUNCH OF RVS AND BOATS, AND SO ON IS ITS OWN USE. PUT THAT ASIDE FOR A SECOND. UM ARE REGULATIONS DO ADDRESS STORAGE OF ONE RV AND ONE VOTE ON PROPERTY. WITH A SINGLE FAMILY OR TO FAMILY RESIDENTS. OKAY SO IT DOES HAVE AN ENTITLEMENT TO STORE AND RV ON A SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTY, SUBJECT TO A LONG LIST OF REGULATIONS. ON IT. SO WE DO HAVE THAT OUR VPS ADDRESS WITH REGARD TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, BUT IT'S SUBJECT TO A LOT OF REGULATION. I MEAN, DOES IT GO INTO SIZE? IT CAN'T BE OVER A CERTAIN SIZE OR THE LIST IS LONG , SO I HAVEN'T GONE THROUGH ALL OF IT TO REMIND MYSELF THAT'S DISTURBING. UM THE, UH. IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT FOR ME TO SUMMARIZE THIS LIST AND IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. HMM. ANYBODY ELSE GOT ANYTHING? I MEAN, THIS IS REALLY JUST FIX THE CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUES THAT WE HAVEN'T I? YEAH BUT I THINK ONCE AGAIN TO ME, IT KIND OF SOUNDS KIND OF PANDORA BOX KIND OF LIKE THE OTHER THING. UM MARTIN COUNTY IS ACTUALLY DOING THE SAME EXACT THING, TOO. OKAY. YEAH, WELL, FINDING OUT THAT WE HAVE A LONG LIST OF RESTRICTIONS ON WHAT SOMEBODY CAN PARK ON THERE.