Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:02]

OFF. SO WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD AND CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. OKAY ROLL CALL, PLEASE. PALMER.

[CALL TO ORDER]

PRESENT CHAIR, MILEY. YEAH REMEMBER BANKS? PRESIDENT REMEMBER PEREZ HERE BOARD MEMBER. PRESSLER IS NOT PRESENT AT THIS TIME OR MEMBER. SO HAYEK SHOULD BE ON ZOOM. COME HERE.

THANK YOU. YES, WE GOT YOU. THANK YOU. REMEMBER WILLIAMS. OKAY, INVOCATION. UM UM. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS, WOULD YOU DO THE INVOCATION? FATHER. GOD, HEAVEN, WE COME NOW. THANKS. BEING SO GOOD. SO KIND TO WHAT ROLLS UP ANOTHER DAY. CALLED FOR A LINE THAT'S TO BE IN THIS STATE. GO WITH US AND STAND BY US AND LEAVE SOMEONE SPIRITUAL DEGREE OF GRACE TO ANOTHER. GREW UP AT THIS MEETING, INSTILLING THAT THE ONLY AUTHORITY WE HAVE WHAT YOU GIVE US. MEETING IN A SPECIAL WAY. WORSE. CAUSE BE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SIGHT. SHRIMP AND OUR ROCK. IN THE MIGHTY NAME. MM HMM. LIGHT FOR FANS. LIBERTY AND JUSTICE. OKAY, APPROVAL OF AGENDA. MADAM GALLINGER. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THE

[APPROVAL OF AGENDA ]

TABLING OF THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 3RD 2000 AND 22 PIZZA BE MEETING OKAY? YOU SAID THE TABLE THE TABLE THE MINUTES OF THE MINUTES, OKAY? OKAY SO THEN WE'LL GO WITH OUR REGULAR GENDER . CORRECT. WELL I'LL MAKE A MOTION. ADDITIONAL APOLOGIZE STAFF HAS ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THE AGENDA AS YOU SIGN YOUR PACKET. WE ARE REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF ITEMS. I DON'T REMEMBER. THREE. AND WE'D ALSO LIKE TO MENTION FOR THOSE IN THE PUBLIC. WHO MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE FOR ANOTHER ITEM THAT WAS CONTINUES RELATED TO THE TREATMENT GATIEN AND SHE'S MITIGATION FOUND THAT ITEM WILL ALSO NOT BE HEARD TONIGHT. IT WAS CONTINUED FOR TONIGHT. IT WILL NOT BE HEARD. THERE WILL BE NO PUBLIC HEARING. HEALTHIER THIS WAY. DID YOU MEAN TO SAY ITEM THREE. ITEM THREE IS THE VARIANCE REQUESTS? I THINK YOU MEANT PERHAPS YOU'RE REFERRING TO ITEM 55. I APOLOGIZE. YES. L D R 21 DASH 81-22. OKAY, SO THAT WE'RE NOT DISCUSSING THAT ONE TONIGHT. YES SO WE CAN JUST REMOVE IT FROM THE AGENDA. ARE WE REMOVING IT? ARE WE RESCHEDULING IT FOR A TIME CERTAIN. LET'S REMOVE IT. THERE'S A WORKSHOP SCHEDULE FOR THE COUNCIL IN CASE UH, IT DOESN'T MOVE FORWARD FROM THERE. WE OKAY, WE'LL JUST RE ADVERTISE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. SO, UM, ITEM FIVE IS THE ONLY ONE. WE'RE REMOVING PART. IT WAS ENOUGH ITEM ONE LABELING ITEM ONE. I'M SORRY. SAY THAT AGAIN. THERE IS ONE IN FIVE ARE BEING TABLED. OKAY? OKAY? SO THE MOTION WOULD BE TO PROVE THE AGENDA AS A MANDATE. CAN MAKE A

[00:05:02]

MOTION. WE MOVE. GOVERNMENT AGENDA. OKAY OKAY, ONE SECOND, I'LL SAY. OKAY, UM, BOARD MEMBER BANKS. YES I REMEMBER. PEREZ YES , REMEMBER, PRESSLER IS NOT PRESENT AT THIS TIME BOARD MEMBERS ARE HAYEK YOUR IMMUNE YES. THANK YOU. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. MILEY PALMER. YES.

[2.  

Approval of the Indiantown PZA Board Rules, Regulations, and Procedures.

]

RIGHT SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD ON TO ITEM TWO IS CORRECT. YES OKAY . SO THE APPROVAL OF THE INDIAN TOWN PZ, A BOARD RULES, REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR, VICE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. STAFF BRINGS TO YOU TONIGHT AND ITEM WHICH YOU HAVE BEEN CONTEMPLATING FOR THE LAST SEVERAL WEEKS, AND NOW THAT WE'VE APPROVED ITEMS FROM LAST MONTH REGARDING YOUR BOARD, MAKEUP AND CORAM. WE HAVE THE FULL AND OFFICIAL IF THEY'RE ADOPTED TONIGHT. RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE INDIAN TOWN P C. A B. I WILL MENTION THAT, UH , ONE BOARD MEMBER WHO IS NOT PRESENT. DID EXPECT TO BE HERE AND PROVIDED ME WITH INFORMATION THEY WERE SUGGESTING THAT WE ADD AND AT THIS TIME BECAUSE WE HAVE ONE BOARD MEMBER ON ZOOM CAN WE EMAIL IT TO HIM? SO HE HAS IT IN FRONT OF HIM. THAT YES. THE REST OF YOU HAVE A SHEET OF PAPER. AT YOUR SEATS, HAS TWO PARAGRAPHS. AND BECAUSE THE BOARD MEMBER IS NOT HERE. I DON'T WANT TO REPRESENT THIS AS MY OWN WORDING. I DO BELIEVE THAT SHE INTENDS. FOR YOU TO CONSIDER ADDING THIS LANGUAGE TO THE DOCUMENT THAT WAS IN YOUR PACKET. AND GIVEN THE NATURE OF THE COMMENTS, THEY WOULD LIKELY BE INSERTED. INTO. SECTIONS SEVEN. I'M SORRY. PAGE SEVEN SECTION EITHER. SIX. OR SEVEN. IT'S REGARDING ETHICS. AND IF THE CORK SO WISHES I CAN READ IT, OR WE CAN JUST HAVE THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE CHAIR. GO AHEAD AND READ IT. WOULD YOU MIND EMAILING INTO ME OR READING IT? I DON'T KNOW THAT I'VE SEEN IT. I'M SORRY. DID YOU SAY PAGE SIX OR SEVEN? YES. BUT WE'RE LOOKING AT THE SHEET OF PAPER PROVIDED AT YOUR SEATS. YES, THAT'S. I DON'T I CAN'T WAIT. THANK YOU. GREAT. I'M SORRY. I JUST EMAIL THIS 10 MINUTES AGO.

SOMETIMES WE RECEIVE THINGS. UM YOU KNOW THE LAST MINUTE AND THAT'S OKAY. WE JUST WORK WITH IT AND GO AHEAD AND READ IT. I'M GOING TO ALLOW THE VILLAGE ATTORNEY TO READ IT IF HE HAS RECEIVED IT AT THIS POINT. SHOULD HAVE IT WEIGHED. UH YEAH , I DO. I'M I'M READING IT NOW.

IN AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE TRANSPARENCY. AND INCREASED PUBLIC CONFIDENCE, A REGULAR WRITTEN PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. FORMS SHALL BE REQUIRED OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE FULFILLED BY COMPLETING A WRITTEN DISCLOSURE FORM. WHICH WILL MAKE KNOWN ALL PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS HELD BY MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, REFLECTING ALL PROPERTIES AND DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPS.

FROM WHICH THEY COULD POTENTIALLY BENEFIT BY MEMBERSHIP ON THIS BOARD. THE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FORM SHALL BE PROMPT AND TIMELY. IT SHALL BE COMPLETED WHEN A BOARD MEMBER

[00:10:07]

MAY RECEIVE COMPENSATION SALARY. PAY CONSIDERATION OR SIMILAR THING OF VALUE. HAS PERMITTED OR DIRECTED ANOTHER TO ACT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY. AND INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO ONCE CLIENT, EMPLOYER OR THE PARENT SUBSIDIARY OR SIBLING ORGANIZATION. OF ONE'S CLIENT.

FOR EMPLOYER. AND SHE INDICATES THIS TEXT WAS TAKEN FROM FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 1 12.3143.

VOTING CONFLICTS. WAIT ISN'T MOST OF THIS FOUND IN THE FORM ONE THAT THEY FILE EVERY YEAR.

NO, IT'S NOT BECAUSE WHAT? WHAT I'M READING HERE IS BASICALLY, SOMEONE WOULD HAVE TO ENDEAVOR TO. JUST CLOSE ALL PROPERTIES. AH OWNED BY YOURSELF. ANY FAMILY MEMBER SPECIFIED IN 1123143 ANY CLIENT ANY EMPLOYER, ANY PARENT SUBSIDIARY SIBLING OF EITHER OF THOSE ANY OF THAT OWNED BY ANY OF THEM. UM. I'M NOT AWARE OF SUCH A BROAD DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT ANYWHERE IN THE STATE AND I WOULD NEED TO WORK OVER THIS LANGUAGE EXTENSIVELY TO MAKE IT AH! ENFORCEABLE. UM.

YEAH. BOARD MEMBERS, UH, JUST SO YOU KNOW, I MEAN IT. IT. THIS IS WELL IN ACCESS OF EVEN WHAT? UMY COMMISSION HAVE TO DISCLOSE ON A FORM SIX AH UNDERSTATE LAW. UM. AT LEAST WITH RESPECT TO WITH RESPECT TO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS OF PERSONS OTHER THAN THEMSELVES. UM. SO I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND ADOPTING THIS TONIGHT WITH THE LANGUAGE THAT'S IN FRONT OF YOU. IF IT WAS THE WILL OF THE BOARD, WE CAN LOOK AT IT FURTHER, BUT I WILL JUST SHARE WITH YOU THAT IT IT'S MUCH BROADER THAN EVEN THE MUCH HIGHER STANDARDS THAT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ARE, UH HELD TO UM AND I'M NOT AWARE OF ONCE HAVE BROUGHT ANYWHERE IN THE STATE. HMM. WELL, MADAM CHAIR. WE CAN HEAR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD IF YOU LIKE. I WOULD SAY, HOWEVER, GIVEN THE VILLAGE ATTORNEY'S OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION THAT WE NOT ADOPT OR. WE NOT ADOPT YOUR RULES AND PROCEDURES TONIGHT WE GOT CLOSE UP. TIME OUT ALTEA. WE CAN ALWAYS AMEND RULES. IT'S VERY EASY IF THERE.

THERE'S NO REASON TO PUT OFF AND PUT OFF AND PUT OFF ADOPTING A SET OF RULES, IF IT WAS ULTIMATELY THE WILL OF THE BOARD TO DO SOMETHING. ALONG THESE LINES, WE CAN ADD IT. LATER.

FANTASTIC. OKAY. TURN EVOLVES. UM. YOU SAID WE CAN ADD A LITTLE LATER, SO I THINK WE SHOULD ENTERTAIN COMMENT FROM THE FROM THE BOARD TO SEE WHAT THE BOARD FEEL ABOUT THIS AND WHAT LANGUAGE SHOULD WE PUT IN THERE? YOU KNOW, WE'LL LEAVE THAT UP, YOU KNOW, JUST TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION. WHAT THE BOARD, UM WHAT THEIR THOUGHTS ARE COME AND UNDERSTAND. YOU SAID THAT THIS IS VERY THIS IS LIKE GOING WAY ABOVE THAN WHAT'S UM, ACTS OF OTHER COUNTIES. MARTIN COUNTY COMMISSION. SO. WERE ENTERTAINED COMMENTS NOW FROM THE BOARD. VICE CHAIR. UM. ONE WE WERE CHOSEN TO BE A PART OF THE STORE. I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WE HAD TO DISCLOSE THIS INFORMATION. THERE WAS A FORM SIMILAR MATCH THE WORD IN THE THESE TWO PARTS.

LOSE, UM PROPERTIES. FOR ANY KNOWN CONFLICT. SORT. I WOULDN'T BE IN FAVOR. VOTING. FOR OH, YOU

[00:15:16]

GOT YOUR USUAL, MIKE. I JUST SAID THAT I WOULDN'T BE IN FAVOR OF VOTING FOR THIS VERVET BECAUSE IF I AM NOT MISTAKEN, WE HAD ALREADY THERE'S SOMETHING IN SOMETHING SIMILAR. THAT WE HAD TO DISCLOSE THE INFORMATION. UM, THAT WAS IN THESE TWO PARAGRAPHS. MASSIVE, OKAY? BOARD MEMBER BANKS AND IS COMING I AGREE WITH OUR ATTORNEY. HAVING JUST RECEIVED THIS BEFORE THE MEETING. I FEEL LIKE IT'S PROBABLY BETTER TO TABLE IT AND WAIT. I MEAN, SHE'S NOT HERE EITHER TO EXPLAIN HER REASONING. MEMBER WILLIAMS. HOUSEHOLD LIKE TO TABLE. IT ALSO BEING FULLY.

TANGIBLE. WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? MEMBER WILLIAMS AND MEMBER BANKS ARE ARE YOU SUGGESTING WE TABLE JUST THE LANGUAGE THAT WAS BEING SUGGESTED? NO NO, I AGREE WITH OUR ATTORNEY. THAT IT'S ALREADY BRITAIN. AND IT'S. SO I WOULD HAVE TO SAY NO QUESTION IS THE NO. TO JUST THE PAPER THAT WAS AT YOUR SEATS TONIGHT? YES, AND WE MOVED FORWARD. YES. GREAT THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION . YES, THANK YOU. BOARD MEMBER PEREIRA'S I KNOW YOU'RE NEW, BUT HEARING FROM YOUR HEARING FROM, UM SORRY, BERNICE. WAS IT MY LADY? THERE YOU GO. YES, AS YOU WERE NOTING EARLIER OF HAVING SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THIS PRIOR LIKE TOWARDS THE BEGINNING. UM, I AGREE THE SAME SO I WOULD AFFIRM THAT AND SAY NO, I WILL NOT. BE TOWARDS OKAY? ALRIGHT, SO NOW WE VOTE RIGHT? WE'RE GOING TO, UM, WE NEED TO VOTE. THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO ADOPT OUR UM ADOPT THIS VERB IT UM BASED ON THE. THE COMMENT FROM OUR AND THE EXPERTISE FROM OUR ATTORNEY. PLEASE LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT. REMEMBER PRESSLER'S NOW PRESENT, OKAY? OKAY SO, UM, HERE? YES. UH WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST, AND I BELIEVE THE BOARD MEMBER THAT THAT PROPOSED THIS LANGUAGE JUST ARRIVED SO SHE MAY HAVE SOME FURTHER EXPLANATION CONCERNING IT. BUT BASED ON WHERE THE DISCUSSION IS GONE AS AS A AS OF THIS POINT, UM YOU DON'T NECESSARILY NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION WITH REGARD TO THIS PROPOSAL HERE. WHAT'S BEFORE YOU ON THE AGENDA IS THE ADOPTION OF THE RULES AS THEY'VE BEEN PRESENTED. SO IF THAT WAS THE WILL OF THE BOARD TO DO SO MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD SIMPLY BE THAT YOU HAVE EMOTION TO ADOPT THE RULES AS PRESENTED ON THE AGENDA. AND THEN, UM HAVE A VOTE ON THAT. OKAY? OKAY. WOULD IT BE OKAY? YOU JUST SPOKE. OKAY UM, BOARD MEMBER PRESS LAST YEAR, SO WE SHOULD GO AHEAD AND ALLOW HER TO EXPLAIN THIS, VERBEEK. THAT WE JUST WENT OVER AND MOVE FROM THERE AND OKAY, THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. UM THE PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS FOR IT IS TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL ON DEVELOPING ON DEVELOPMENT POSITION PETITIONS. AND TO HEAR AND DECIDE UPON VARIANTS REQUESTS AND APPEALS TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS ON ISSUES RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. ALTHOUGH THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS RULES REGARDING CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THEY ARE NOT EFFECTIVE UNLESS WRONGDOING IS EXPOSED AND REPORTED I'M ADVOCATING FOR A REPORTING MECHANISM TO AVOID PROBLEMS IN THE FUTURE. IT IS A TIME CONSUMING PROCESS WHEN A BOARD MEMBER PARTNERS WITH NUMEROUS PEOPLE AND NUMEROUS PROPERTIES OR WHEN PROPERTIES ARE HELD IN A TRUST, MEANING THAT THE NAMES OF THE BENEFICIARIES OR SHIELDED FROM PUBLIC VIEW. I HOPE THAT YOU AGREE WITH ME THAT ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS ARE DEFINITELY NEEDED. IN AN EFFORT

[00:20:03]

TO DISCOURAGE SOMEONE FROM ATTEMPTING TO BENEFIT THEMSELVES OR THEIR BUSINESS PARTNERS. WE SHOULD REQUIRE AT LEAST THE SAME LEVEL OF ACCOUNTABILITY AS MENTIONED IN THE VOTING CONFLICTS STATUTE. SOME MEMBERS ON THIS BOARD MIGHT BE THINKING I WOULD NEVER DO THAT. BUT I ASSURE YOU, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO WOULD IN THE PAST, WE HAVE RELIED ON A PERSON'S WORD WHEN DISCLOSING WHAT PROPERTIES THEY OWN AND WORK PROPERTIES FROM WHICH THEY WILL BENEFIT OR WILL BENEFIT FROM IN THE FUTURE WITHOUT CHECKING OR TRACKING THIS INFORMATION. INDEED CHAPTER 1 12 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTE ALLOWS FOR A DISCLOSURE FORM IN TO BE FOR A MEMBER OF THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE. IN MY OPINION, WE NEED SUCH A FORM. I'M SURE EVERYONE HERE IS IN SUPPORT OF HONESTY AND OPENNESS . BUT I DO NOT THINK THAT SIMPLY RELYING ON A PERSON'S WORD IS ENOUGH TO ENGENDER TRUST. WHEN THE PCA BOARD VOTES WE SHOULD BE SURE THAT SOMEONE IS NOT MAKING MOTIONS OR CASTING VOTES, WHICH WILL MAXIMIZE THEIR PROFITS. WE ARE HERE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE VILLAGE. I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT OUR VILLAGE STAFF IS NOW DOCUMENTING HOW MANY TIMES A PERSON RECUSES THEMSELVES SO THAT IT CAN BE BACK CHECKED. UM THE I DON'T KNOW. I GUESS THE TWO PARAGRAPHS THAT I HAD COME UP WITH SOME LANGUAGE HAS BEEN PASSED OUT.

YOU KNOW THAT IS TWEAKED IT A LITTLE BETTER. YOU KNOW, IN OTHER WORDS, WHEN A PERSON COMES ON THE BOARD ANNUALLY, WE WOULD REPORT OUR HOME, YOU KNOW, ADDRESS OR WHATEVER REAL ESTATE WE HAVE, YOU KNOW, BEING AN ANNUAL THING. BUT AS CHANGES OCCUR FOR SOMEONE WHO BUYS AND SELLS A LOT OF PROPERTY, OR IS AN AGENT OF PROPERTY OR OTHERWISE ENTANGLED, THEY WOULD NEED TO BE REPORTING ALL THE TIME. THEY SHOULD REPORT AS SOON AS THESE CHANGES OCCUR. ATTORNEY WADE. YEAH MISS PRESSLER, BOARD MEMBER PRESSER. I WAS JUST BEFORE YOU CAME IN. I WAS JUST SHARING WITH THE BOARD THAT IF IT WERE THEIR DESIRE TO ADOPT SOMETHING ALONG THESE LINES, UM I WOULD WANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO UH, DO SOME SURGERY. IF YOU WILL, TO SOME OF THIS LANGUAGE.

I WAS ALSO SHARING AND WE'VE DISCUSSED THIS BEFORE THAT, UM THE BREADTH. OF THE DISCLOSURE THAT THAT I THINK I'M SAYING AND AGAIN, THAT'S THAT'S WHY WE NEED TO TUNE IT UP A LITTLE BIT. BUT THE BREADTH OF THE DISCLOSURE THAT I THINK I'M SEEING IN THIS FAR EXCEEDS THE DISCLOSURE THAT WE HAVE UNDER THE STATE FORM ONE THAT YOU AS MEMBERS AND THE VILLAGE COUNCIL HAVE TO FILL OUT. GET FOR EXCEEDS THE DISCLOSURE THAT, UH, IS REQUIRED OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS UNDER THE STATE FORMS SIX. UM AND QUITE FRANKLY, I'M NOT AWARE OF ANYWHERE IN THE STATE THAT HAS AH, DISCLOSURES OF SUCH BREADTH AND, UM AND. RECURRENCE AND SO I WAS JUST SHARING THAT EXPERIENCE WITH THEM. IN ANY EVENT, THE. I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND ADOPTING THIS LANGUAGE AS IT IS TONIGHT BECAUSE I'M I'M SEEING SOME PLACES IT IT NEEDS SOME TUNE UP. TO BE, UM AT MINIMUM, MORE PRECISE AND MORE ENFORCEABLE. WELL I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT I ANTICIPATED, YOU KNOW IS THAT YOU WOULD WEIGH IN AND EVERYONE WOULD LOOK AT THIS. THINK ABOUT IT. TALK ABOUT IT AND IMPROVE IT . UM THE LANGUAGE IN THE SECOND PARAGRAPH WAS SIMPLY TAKEN FROM THE FLORIDA STATUTE. IF YOU BENEFIT FROM SOMETHING THAT YOU'RE ABLE TO MAKE A MOTION ON AND VOTE ON, UM THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO ADDRESS. FURTHER DISCLOSURE. YOU KNOW WE HAVE OUR JURISDICTION WHICH WAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE. THAT'S OUR CONCERN. UH IF SOMEONE WANTS TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD, I THINK IT SHOULD BE PUBLIC INFORMATION. NOT SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE TO DO A LOT OF WORK TO FIND OUT WHAT IT IS. YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY ONE OF THE THINGS WE MENTIONED WAS SOMEONE WHO HOLDS PROPERTY IN A TRUST. THOSE NAMES ARE SHIELDED. WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE. SO

[00:25:02]

SOMEONE HAD TO VOTING CONFLICT. WE WOULDN'T KNOW THERE'S NO WAY FOR US TO KNOW. HOW WOULD WE KNOW SOMEONE WHO'S BUYING SELLING PROPERTY OR IS THE AGENT OF AND SO FORTH ALL THE TIME? WE'RE GOING NOT GOING TO KNOW ABOUT THAT EITHER. I DON'T KNOW OF ANYONE WHO'S TRACKING THAT OR LOOKED INTO ANY OF THAT. UM BUT IT'S CERTAINLY A WAY OF PREVENTING, UH, SOME FUTURE PROBLEMS. IF YOU JUST DISCLOSE UP FRONT ANNUALLY OR AS CHANGES OCCUR. I THINK IT'S VERY REASONABLE. OKAY. NOW THAT, UM. MEMBER PRESSLER HAS COME AND EXPLAIN, AND WE'VE HEARD WHAT SHE HAD TO SAY HER CONCERNS AS WELL AS THE ATTORNEY ARE ENTERTAINED ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

SO MAYBE, UM, IF. IF ANYONE IF THE BOARD MEMBERS WANT PALMER MEMBERS TO HIKE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. OKAY. SOON AS I'M FINISHED. IF ANY, IF ANY OF YOU ALL WANTED TO SAY ANYTHING OR ASK ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. WE WANT TO GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY SO YOU CAN MAKE A CLEAR AND A CONCISE, UM, COMMENT OR VOTE AND WE WANTED TO JUST TRY TO KEEP IT UNDER TWO MINUTES, SO EVERYBODY HAS A FAIR CHANCE OF SPEAKING. OKAY, REMEMBER, SO HYAH! YEAH, I JUST I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, AS OTHERS ELUDED, THERE'S A FORM ONE THAT WERE REQUIRED TO FILL OUT SO THERE ALREADY IS A DISCLOSURE. THAT WE PROVIDE. SO THE THAT I DO BELIEVE THAT THAT CONCERN IS ALREADY ADDRESSED. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOICE THEIR CONCERN OR MAKE A COMMENT? OKAY? OKAY? SO WHAT'S THE PLEASURE OF THE BOARD? CONCERNING WHAT WE'VE HEARD AND WHAT YOU ALL WANT TO DO I THINK WE SHOULD FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE OKAY. OKAY MOTION. YEAH. JUST WANT TO MAKE A MOTION. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. OF THE APPROVAL OF THE INDIAN TIME PC. A BOARD RULES, REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES AS IT WAS SENT TO US PRIOR TO THIS MEETING. SO CAN HIS SECOND. I MEAN, THOSE OF YOU THAT AGREED. SOMEBODY SHOULD SECOND. OH, OKAY, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. YOU'VE GOT THAT MISSILE? YES. OKAY BANKS? YES REMEMBER PEREZ? CORRECT YES. MEMBER PRESSLER? YES. BOARD MEMBER, SAID HAYEK. YES. REMEMBER WILLIAMS. VICE CHAIR. MILEY YES. PALMER? YES. OKAY. THANK YOU. UN NUMBER V 22 DEATHS 018. THE

[3.  

Application No. V-22-018: Variance Request to Allow Six Feet High Fence in the Front Setback Area, Where a Maximum of Four Feet is Permitted.

]

VARIOUS REQUEST TO ALLOW SIX FT. DID YOU TABLE? THAT ONE? DID YOU? OKAY BUT WE DO NEED TO SWEAR EVERYBODY IN ON THIS ITEM, OKAY? IF ANYBODY WILL BE SPEAKING ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE STAND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. THAT'S NOT THE BOARD MEMBERS, JUST APPLE APPLICANT STAFF. DO YOU SWEAR THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD. THANK YOU. OKAY? MADAM CHAIR. WE DO HAVE, UH CONSULTANT PLANNERS. STAFF HERE, MR ALEX DAVID, WHO IS THE PROJECT PLANNER FOR THIS PARTICULAR CASE. THE INDIAN TOWN MARINE CENTERS SEEKING APPROVAL FROM THE BOARD. FOR ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANTS FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE REGULATIONS TO PERMIT A SIX FT HIGH FENCE. IN THE FRONT SETBACK, WHERE ONLY A FOUR FT HIGH FENCE MAXIMUM IS NORMALLY PERMITTED WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK AREA. AND WE DO HAVE A PRESENTATION. I'M UP. YES, SIR. OKAY? GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR , VICE CHAIR AND THE AND THE BOARD MEMBERS. I'M ALEX DAVID. A BIT OF A STICKER. ALEX DAVID, I HAVE A COLD. SO SORRY. A SOUND A LITTLE STUFFY, UM I'M HERE TO PRESENT THIS ITEM IS, MISS JEFFERSON SAID. IN AGAIN THE APPLICATION NUMBERS FEED DASH 22 2018 NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. NEXT

[00:30:09]

LINE. THERE WE GO. ALSO AS MISS JEFFERSON STATED, THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW A SIX FT HIGH FENCE IN THE FRONT SETBACK AREA. SO THE FRONT SETBACK OF, UM DEALS WITH YOU'RE BUILDING YOUR PRIMARY BUILDING OR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS . THAT'S THE SETBACK OR THE BUILD TO LINE FROM. IN THIS CASE, THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE TO WHERE THE BUILDING IS PERMITTED TO BE BUILT. SO IN THIS CASE IN THE CANAL MIXED USE DISTRICT, WHICH IS WHERE THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED. THE REQUIRED A SETBACK AS 25 FT. SO. IN THAT AREA. ONE IS PERMITTED TO BUILD A FOUR FT FENCE BY RIGHT BECAUSE OF SECURITY CONCERNS FOR THE MARINE CENTER AND OTHER ISSUES, AND I'LL GET INTO THAT A BIT LATER, VERY REQUESTING A BIT HIGHER FENCE IN THIS SETBACK AREA. THEY ARE REQUESTING THE SIX FT FENCE , SO THAT IS THE VARIANCE REQUEST. SIX FT VERSUS THE ALLOWABLE FOREFOOT FACTS. UM, NEXT SLIDE. PLEASE OKAY. SO AGAIN, I JUST EXPLAINED ASSISTANTS BASICALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE A NUMBER OF WORDS THROUGH BREEN. BOATS ON THAT SIDE THAT WILL BE SERVICED REPAIRED. UM TOOLS, OTHER ITEMS THEY NEED TO SECURE THE SITE A BIT BETTER, UM, SO THIS IS JUST THE LOCATION. LOCATION MAP. I GAVE THE ADDRESSES OF THE WHOLE SITE, WHICH IS 38 ACRES BY THE WAY, SO IT'S A VERY LARGE SITE. UM IT'S 20717 AND 21043 CITRUS BOULEVARD. SO WITH THAT, UM AGAIN THAT YOUR YOUR PACKAGE DOES INCLUDE UM, OF THE STAFF REPORT OUTLINING, UM, VARIANTS REQUESTS FROM SECTION 3-4 0.7, WHICH IS YOUR EFFECTS AS WELL AND HEDGES. SECTION OF THE CODE. UM AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, BUT THEY MEET THEY DO . I'D LIKE TO SAY ALSO THAT THEY DO MEET THE RE, UH, APPROVAL STANDARDS IN THE CODE UNDER SECTION 12. DASH 12, WHICH IS THE VARIANCE CRITERIA WITHIN THE CODE. SO AGAIN, I WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND AS IT STATES ON THE SLIDE THAT YOU ARE THE FINAL DETERMINING BODY TONIGHT UNLESS IT'S APPEALED TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, BUT YOUR RECOMMENDATION, UH IS, YOU KNOW, AS IS FINAL. WITH THAT I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY WE'RE IN A TANK QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME BOARD. I'LL JUST ASK A QUESTION. UM I WAS LOOKING AT THE DIAGRAM, UH, THAT WAS INCLUDED. I DON'T KNOW WHAT, SAYS PAGE 42. IT WOULD JUST WASN'T CLEAR TO ME WHICH DIRECTION THIS IS GOING. I SEE A NOTED ON THE MAP THAT THE EXISTING FENCE WILL REMAIN, AND IS THIS BEHIND THE EXISTING FENCE GOING TOWARD THE WATER OR OR WHAT? I DON'T SEE WHAT WE.

THE EXISTING FENCES IN FRONT OF THIS THIS FENCE. I'M SORRY. YEAH THE EXISTING FENCES TOWARDS CITRUS. UM CITRUS SIDE, SO THE EXISTING CHAIN LINK IS CLOSE TO TWO CITRUSY AND THEN THIS WOULD BE BEHIND THAT FENCE AT THE 20. FT. MARK. BACK FROM THE ROAD OR THE YOU KNOW THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SO IT'S IN THIS DIAGRAM. IT'S A BIT IT'S A LITTLE HARD TO SEE. BUT IT'S THE YELLOW WHOLE STRIP BETWEEN THE TWO CANAL SPURS. YES, SO THAT YEAH, THAT WOULD BE THE 28. IT'S BASICALLY 2800 FT IN LENGTH. UM THERE WAS A SENTENCE IN YOUR LETTER, THE ATTACHED LETTER. I THINK IT WAS PAGE THREE. THAT KIND OF CONFUSED ME WHERE YOU TALK ABOUT THE 20 FT, OR, UM, IT SAYS THE PROPOSED LOCATION IS 20 FT. FROM THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY LINE WHERE 25 FT WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR A SIX FT FENCE BY RIGHT UM RAMEZ, IS THIS IN MY IN THE RE STAFF REPORTER IN THE APPLICANTS LETTER? RIGHT LET'S THE APPLICANTS LETTER SO THAT QUESTION WOULD BE POSED TO THE

[00:35:03]

APPLICANTS AGENT WHO IS WHO IS PRESENT. UM. MR ROBBINS. CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION? WELL I WAS JUST, YOU KNOW, LOOKING AT WHERE? WHERE DID THE OTHER FIVE FT COME IN BETWEEN? YOU KNOW 20 AND 25. ARE YOU? MR WALSH? OKAY? PLACE THAT YOUR NAME AND SPEAKING TO THE MIC. DAN ROMANCE. AH THE BUILDING SETBACK ON OUR FRONT IS 25 FT, SO I CAN ONLY HAVE A FOUR FT FENCE WITHIN THAT. 25 FT, RIGHT. 25 FT. I'M ALLOWED TO HAVE A SIX FT HIGH FENCE. WHAT I'D LIKE TO MOVE DO IS MOVE THAT FENCE IN FIVE FT TO 20 FT AND HAVE A SIX FT HIGH FENCE. OKAY 20 FT INSTEAD OF 25 . SO THAT'S WHERE THE OTHER FIVE FT COMES IN. SO IT'S MAKING IT FIVE FT. CLOSER TO THE ROADWAY THAN YOU WOULD NORMALLY. BE ALLOWED TO HAVE FOR A SIX FT FENCE. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY GREAT. THANK YOU. I JUST THANKS FOR CLARIFYING THAT. COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? NO MATTER OF CARE, OKAY? OKAY. WHAT'S THE PLEASURE OF THE BOARD? I RECOMMEND THAT WE APPROVE. GO AHEAD, I'LL SECOND. FOR MEMBER BANKS. YES REMEMBER PEREZ? YES REMEMBER PRESSLER? YES. FOR MEMBERS OF HAYEK. YES REMEMBER WILLIAMS? MILEY YES. PALMER? YES? THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. OKAY I WANT NEXT ON THE AGENDA. APPLICATION NUMBER LD R 22 008.

[4.  

Application No. LDR-22-008:  A Request to Amend the Village of Indiantown Land Development Regulations to Create the Planned Unit Development Zoning District (PUD), and to Revise the PUD Application Submittal Requirements, and Approval Procedures.

]

I WANT TO READ THE TITLE. OKAY REQUEST TO AMEND THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO CREATE THE PLANT UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT. EU DE AND TO REVISE THE P U D APPLICATIONS, SOME MENTAL REQUIREMENTS AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES. THE STAFF WAS SPEAK ON THAT. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. APPLICATION NUMBER LD R DASH 22-8 IS REQUEST TO AMEND ITS A STAFF REQUEST TO AMEND RIGHT? THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. TO INCLUDE A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT. CURRENTLY THE CODE DOESN'T ALLOW THIS TYPE OF DISTRICT WE DO HAVE P U D S WITHIN THE VILLAGE ALREADY. IT'S JUST THAT THE EXISTING CODE DOES NOT HAVE A DESIGNATED PROCESS TO ESTABLISH NEW P U DS. SO THIS IS WHAT THIS ORDINANCE WILL DO FOR THE VILLAGE. SHOULD YOU MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE? STAFF. WAS RECOMMENDING A MINIMUM OF 100 ACRES. THIS PRESENTATION WAS DONE. UH, PRIOR TO YOU RECEIVING YOUR PACKAGE.

THE LAND DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PROCESS. INCLUDES STAFF REPORT WITH THE REVIEW AND REQUESTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. THE. REQUEST COMES TO YOU AS A BOARD AND YOU RECOMMEND, UH, APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF THE PROPOSED APPLICATION AND THEN IT GOES TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. FOR THEIR APPROVAL, AND IT GOES TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL TWICE IF THEY DECIDE TO HAVE A SECOND HEARING TO ADOPT. THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST INCLUDES GOING THE WRONG WAY. STAFF IS PREPARING TO BIG RECOMMENDATION TONIGHT. AH TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM. UNFORTUNATELY THE SCREEN SAYS, RECOMMEND TO APPROVE. WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT TONIGHT. WE RECEIVED SOME LAST MINUTE COMMENTS. AND. WE ARE UNABLE TO INCORPORATE ALL OF THE COMMENTS , WHICH WERE AT YOUR SEATS AS

[00:40:02]

WELL TONIGHT INTO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE THERE PROVIDED FOR YOU TONIGHT JUST AND THE SAKE OF FULL DISCLOSURE THAT WE DID RECEIVE THEM. WE RECOGNIZE THEM , AND THERE ARE SOME SOME GOOD RECOMMENDATIONS IN HERE THAT STAFF WOULD BE AMENABLE TO IT JUST WOULD TAKE US TIME. SO WE ARE REQUESTING TO CONTINUE THE ITEM. PERHAPS TO YOUR. YOUR MAY MAYOR, JUNE MEETING. WE HAVE A FULL AGENDA ALREADY FOR ME. YES. COULD I JUST ASK YOU YES. I'M SORRY, JUST REAL QUICK. THAT IS ULTIMATELY GOING TO BE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION THAT WE BASICALLY HAVE ANOTHER MONTH TO DO A LITTLE FURTHER WORK BASED ON THE COMMENTS WE'VE RECEIVED, BUT I A B MEMBERS HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW WHAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF THEM TODAY. CERTAINLY TO GET COMMENTS FROM THEM, AS IT IS THUS FAR. DISCUSS IT A LITTLE BIT. I'D BE GLAD TO GIVE A LITTLE FURTHER BACKGROUND AND EXPLANATION. ON IT AND SEE IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC OR WHAT HAVE YOU AND THEN WE CAN HAVE MORE INPUT TO BE ABLE TO BRING BACK AN EVEN BETTER PRODUCT. NEXT TIME START INTERRUPT, WHO WAS JUST WHOEVER WAS JUST SPEAKING. PLEASE BE WORKING IZED BY THE CHAIR. LET HER FINISH, PLEASE. FEELINGS OKAY, GO AHEAD, MAN. COULD YOU TALK JUST A LITTLE BIT? UH HEALTHY A TO US ABOUT LIKE, HOW MANY P U. D S DO WE HAVE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES? HOW MANY OF THEM HAVE, UM HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS AND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WHICH IS WHAT YOU'RE RELYING ON? UM TO KIND OF RUN THE P U D WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONING? I HAPPEN TO LIVE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAD A FUNCTIONING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION THAT IS NOW NO LONGER FUNCTIONING. YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT HAPPENS BECAUSE, UM.

I THINK WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS EARLIER THIS WEEK. UM AND YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT THAT, LIKE THERE WERE THERE. IT ALLOWS FOR GREATER FLEXIBILITY AND YOU HAVE END UP WITH FEWER REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES. FOR VARIANCES AND THE LIKE. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS CONDITIONAL. YOU SAID, IS. IT JUST BECOMES A CLEANER. DOCUMENT OR PROPOSAL WITHOUT THE VARIANCES. UH HUH. IF YOU RECALL TRACTOR SUPPLY THAT'S NOT A P U D BUT IT'S AN APPLICATION THAT HAD THREE VARIANCES, ESPECIAL EXCEPTION AND CONDITIONAL USE AS WELL AS THE MASTER SITE PLAN.

AND PLATT AND HAD THAT BEEN A LARGER PROJECT WITH THAT EXTENT OF REQUESTS. THIS PROCESS WOULD COULD PREVENT THAT. BECAUSE. WELL YOU JUST RECENTLY SAW A P U D, UM COME TO YOU THE TERRA LAGO P U D. SO WITHIN WITHIN THAT REQUEST WAS A DOCUMENT FOR THE U. D. AH ZONING AGREEMENT. SO IN THAT AGREEMENT IS WHERE WE TALK ABOUT THE PARTICULAR REGULATIONS FOR THE MASTER PLANNING OF THE P U. D. IT DOES ALLOW MORE FLEXIBILITY. DO DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW HOW MANY P U. D S WE HAVE THAT'S ONE TERRA LAGO. OKAY YES. SO WE HAVE TERRA LAGO YELLOW PINES. I CAN'T COUNT THEM ALL OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. I'M SURE WE HAVE AT LEAST THREE OR FOUR THAT ARE INDUSTRIAL. UH I WOULD SAY, I'LL THROW IN VENTURE PARK. ALSO INDUSTRIAL, WE PROBABLY HAVE LESS THAN 10. IT'S SOMEWHERE BETWEEN EIGHT AND 10. SO THERE'S A DIFFERENCE IN INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL, UM WHO OVERSEES INDUSTRIAL P U. D. SIMILAR TO WHAT THE RESIDENTIALM THE AGREEMENT. UM HELPS TO ESTABLISH THAT AND I BELIEVE THERE IS A FORM OF AN H O A FOUR NON RESIDENTIAL. A FORM OF A NATURE WAY OF A FORM OF A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WELL, NOT IT'S CALLED SOMETHING ELSE.

BUT THERE'S UM, PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. THANK YOU, OKAY. MADAM CHAIR. UM. WOULD WOULD YOU

[00:45:12]

MIND IF I JUMPED IN AND EXPANDED ON THAT WITH WITH SOME OF THE, UH, THE QUESTIONS? IT'S JUST BEEN POSED AHEAD, PLEASE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH. AND DARREN, WOULD YOU MIND TAKING IT OFF? TAKE IT OFF SHARE SCREEN. SO I CAN THERE IS A FANTASTIC BOARD MEMBERS. SO LET ME LET ME BACK UP AND HEALTHY. A MADE A GREAT POINT. I WANT TO WANT TO KIND OF FRAME THIS FOR YOU BECAUSE WE'VE TALKED ABOUT A COUPLE OF CONCEPTS HERE THAT ARE WORTH THINKING ABOUT AND DISTINGUISHING AND UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WITH THE P U D, UM AS HEALTHY, A POINTED OUT, UH, YOU ALL AND NOT ALL OF YOU, BUT A LOT OF YOU BECAUSE WE HAVE NEW MEMBERS ON ON THE PC. A B. A LOT OF YOU HAVE DEALT WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BEFORE AND THAT WAS THE CAROLINA TERRA LAGO PROJECT . LET'S BACK UP AND LET ME EXPLAIN VERY BRIEFLY FOR ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS AND PARTICULARLY THE NEW ONES. WHAT A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS OKAY? IT IS BASICALLY AN OPPORTUNITY. FOR A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, WHETHER THAT IS A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, OR IT IS A COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT AS WE, UH AS ALEX JUST MENTIONED THE VENTURE PARK INDUSTRIAL P U D OR A MIXED USE PROJECT WHERE A DEVELOPER CAN COME IN TO THE VILLAGE AND SAY WE HAVE A UNIQUE VISION. WE HAVE A BIG PLAN FOR WHAT WE WANT TO DO FOR THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY. AND WE'D LIKE TO WORK WITH THE VILLAGE TO DEVELOP OUR OWN. UNIQUE EFFECTIVELY UNIQUE AND SELF CONTAINED LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THIS ONE PROJECT. OKAY, UM. WHENEVER A P U. D AGREEMENT IS DEVELOPED ALONG THOSE LINES, IT STILL HAS TO CONFORM TO YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AS YOU ALL MAY RECALL, YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS THE BASE DOCUMENT THAT SETS THE BASE RULES, UH, OF HOW LAND DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO WORK WITHIN THE VILLAGE. BUT ON TOP OF THAT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WE HAVE THE L. D. R S BUT WITH THE P U D WE CAN SAY WELL, WE NEED TO REPLACE OUT SOME OF THOSE THINGS. WE NEED TO CHANGE SOME OF THOSE THINGS. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OUR OWN COMPLETELY SELF CONTAINED CODE. THAT ADDRESSES HOW THIS PROJECT USUALLY BIGGER PROJECTS, BUT NOT ALWAYS IN DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS ARE GOING TO WORK. OKAY AS HEALTHY A MENTIONED IT PROVIDES GREATER FLEXIBILITY FOR THE PLAN AND HOPE IS FOR BETTER PROJECTS, UM , WHEN THEY'RE ABLE TO DEVELOP ON THAT SCALE, AND, UH AND TRY NEW AND INNOVATIVE WAYS TO DEAL WITH ISSUES NOW IT WAS MENTIONED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS, SO IT IS COMMON IN A LOT OF PLACES.

THEY SAY, YOU KNOW, FOR SOME BIG PROJECT. THEY'LL REFER TO A P U D AND AN H O A KIND OF INTERCHANGEABLE. THE P U. D IS AS WE TALKED ABOUT. IT'S KIND OF THE SELF CONTAINED LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT AREA IN H O. A HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION IS AS SOME OF YOU ALL KNOW IF YOU LIVE IN ONE A AN ORGANIZATION THAT'S RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING UP YOUR COMMON ELEMENTS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, RIGHT? IT IS COMMON WHEN YOU DEVELOP ANY LARGE RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE, UH, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND UNIVERSALLY. THE CASE WITH P U. D S THAT AN H O A WOULD BE ESTABLISHED. THEY HAVE SOME INTERACTION IN THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF PROMISES THAT ARE MADE USUALLY IN A P U D AGREEMENT. THAT THOSE PROMISES ARE TAKEN ON BY THE H O A. THEY THEY'RE AGREEING, OR THEY'RE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN THE COMMON ELEMENTS. THE OPEN SPACE THE GREEN SPACE, MAINTAIN SOME ROADS OR SIDEWALKS, POTENTIALLY OR SOME PARKS IN A GIVEN INSTANCE, AND VARY IN DIFFERENT THINGS. UM CONTROL OVER WHETHER OR NOT AN H O A FAILS. UM UNFORTUNATELY, OAS FAILING IS USUALLY IF IT'S A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT AT THE BEGINNING. IT USUALLY DOESN'T FAIL UNTIL 25 30 OR 40 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD, AND THERE'S NOT MUCH YOU CAN DO TO CONTROL THAT FAR AWAY. UM THERE ARE USUALLY REQUIREMENTS IN UM. WELL THAT'S ABOUT AS MUCH AS I CAN SAY ABOUT H ALWAYS THERE, UH, WITH REGARD TO THE ORDINANCE, THAT'S BEFORE

[00:50:01]

YOU. WHAT WE'RE DOING IS OUT, THE A SAID, IS CHANGING WHAT ORIGINALLY HAD BEEN IN THE ORIGINAL, UH, L D ARE THE ORIGINAL D R SAID YEP. WE HAVE SOME OF THESE P. U D S FROM MARTIN COUNTY DAYS, BUT WE'RE NOT GONNA DO ANY NEW PDS. WHEN WE'VE BEEN APPROACHED BY FOLKS LOOKING TO COME TO PROJECTS WITHIN THE VILLAGE. A LOT OF THEM HAVE EXPRESSED. THEY'RE USED TO DOING THINGS IN THE P U. D. WAY OF DOING THINGS, AND IT WOULD BE, UM, YOU KNOW, YIELD A BETTER PRODUCT FOR EVERYBODY INVOLVED IF THEY COULD DO IT THAT WAY. SO AS WE LOOKED AT IT, WE DECIDED WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND ADD IN, UM SOMETHING THAT WOULD ENABLE CREATING NEW P U D S WHAT THIS ULTIMATELY ALLOWS IS BASICALLY IT WOULD END UP WITH KIND OF THE PROCESS WE HAD WITH TERRA LAGO, EXCEPT THAT INSTEAD OF CHANGING WHAT THEY'RE AH DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ON THAT PROPERTY HAD BEEN BECAUSE THERE WAS AN EXISTING AGREEMENT THAT WE WERE CHANGING. COMPLETELY UH , THEY WOULD BE TROOPING IN TWO FIRST STAFF AND THEN TO YOU ALL THE P C, A B AND THEN ULTIMATELY TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. TO APPROVE THIS P U D AGREEMENT THAT LIKE IN THE TERRA LAGO AGREEMENT HAD BIG LISTS OF ALL THESE THINGS. ALL THESE REQUIREMENTS, UH, THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE REQUIRED OF THEM. YOU KNOW HOW MANY UNITS THEY CAN BUILD? AND OF WHAT TYPES? WHAT ARE THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE IS WHAT ARE THEY SETBACKS AND WHAT ARE THE LOT SIZE AVERAGE IS GOING TO BE ALL THESE THINGS FOR PAGES AND PAGES, SETTING THAT ALL OUT. WHAT THIS ORDINANCE IN PARTICULAR DOES. IT ENABLES THAT BUT THAT YOU KNOW THAT'S PRETTY EASY. IT JUST SAYS YOU CAN DO IT . AND THEN IT KIND OF PUTS SOME RAILS ON. WHAT WHAT THOSE P U D PROJECTS UH, ARE GOING TO BE OR AT VERY LEAST WHAT ISSUES THEY'RE GOING TO NEED TO ADDRESS AT ONE POINT OR ANOTHER IN THE P U D PROCESS. IT GIVES SOME STRUCTURE TO THAT. OUT AS HEALTHY. A MENTIONED, UM, WE RECEIVED IN WRITING A NUMBER OF , UM, VERY VALUABLE COMMENTS FROM MITCH HUTCH CRAFT WHOSE, UM, HAS SPOKEN THE P. C. A B BEFORE UH, HE'S WITH KING RANCH AND HE'S HE'S ALWAYS, UM, BEEN KEEN TO PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE VILLAGE ON THE CAR PLAN AND LD. R S AND SO ON. UM IN REVIEWING THOSE COMMENTS. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF GOOD ONES IS OUT THERE MENTIONED THAT THAT WE THINK ARE WORTH LOOKING AT. YOU KNOW, HOW CAN WE INTEGRATE? UH SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES OF WHAT ARE RECOMMENDED. ONE I'LL TAKE A NUMBER OF COMMENTS THAT THAT KIND OF GO TO ONE OVERARCHING CONCEPT, SOMETHING I THINK WE'VE GOT TO DO A LITTLE SURGERY AND HERE TO ADDRESS AND THAT IS.

THERE IS A CONCERN FOR DEVELOPERS THAT WHEN THEY'RE DOING LIKE WE HAVE WITH TERRA LAGO, A BIG 10 TO 15 YEAR MULTIPHASE PROJECT. THAT IT IS DIFFICULT. UM. AND UNNECESSARY BUT BUT CERTAINLY DIFFICULT TO PLAN EVERY LITTLE BIT OF ALL OF THOSE MULTIPLE PHASES DOWN TO WHERE EVERY SINGLE LOTS GOING TO BE. ALL RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING. AND PRIMARILY WHAT YOU SEE IN THE VERSION OF THE ORDINANCE, THAT'S BEFORE YOU RIGHT NOW. IT DOESN'T PROBABLY DOESN'T ADDRESS PHASING RIGOROUSLY ENOUGH. THIS WOULD APPLY A LITTLE BIT BETTER IN A PROJECT THAT WAS, SAY 75 TO 100 ACRES. COME ON IN AND SAY WE'RE GOING TO DO A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 75 TO 100 ACRES GOING TO BE ONE BIG FACE. THEN WE WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM AT ALL SAYING, YEP, RIGHT OUT OF THE BAT, UH, THE P. C A. B AND THE VILLAGE COUNCIL ARE GONNA WANT TO SEE EVERYTHING FROM YOUR GENERAL CONCEPT ALL THE WAY UP TO PARTICULARLY HOW YOU'RE GOING TO LAY STUFF OUT. WHAT SORT OF LIGHT FIXTURES YOU'RE GOING TO USE? WHAT SORT OF SIGNAGE YOU'RE GOING TO USE, BUT FOR A MULTIPHASE PROJECT OVER MANY YEARS, UM, GETTING INTO THAT LEVEL OF DETAIL FOR WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO SEE IN PHASE FOUR. UM IS DIFFICULT AND NOT TYPICAL. SO THERE ARE OTHER COMMENTS THAT THAT MR HUTCH CRAFT PROVIDED AS WELL AND LIKE I SAID, I THINK A FAIR NUMBER OF THEM ARE USEFUL.

BUT I THINK THAT WAS A BIG OVERARCHING ONE, AND I THINK A LITTLE BIT OF THE SURGERY. WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO TEASE OUT IN A REVISED VERSION OF THIS BEFORE YOUR NEXT MEETING. AND SO WITH

[00:55:06]

THIS I'M SORRY TO TALK SO LONG IN THAT, BUT BUT WITH THIS, I WOULD ENCOURAGE, IF ANY, UM IF ANY BOARD MEMBERS HAD REVIEWING THE ORDINANCE THAT YOU HAD BEFORE YOU IF YOU HAD ANY QUESTIONS FOR AS IT IS, OR HAD ANY COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS. UM PLEASE SHARE THEM WITH US. THANK YOU, ATTORNEY BOSS. MEMORY PERSON. I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION . UM YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT LIKE, UM THEY HAVE THEIR OWN. UNIQUE LAND DEVELOPMENT RULES AS LONG AS THEY CONFORM TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HOW DO YOU MEASURE THAT IF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS A VISION BUT THE LAND DEVELOPMENT RULES ARE THE ONLY THING THAT HAS ANYTHING THAT'S MEASURABLE IN IT , YOU KNOW, LIKE SAYING, UM, YOU KNOW, BUILDING HEIGHT IS LIMITED TO FOUR STORIES. THERE ISN'T ANYTHING LIKE THAT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT'S A VISION. HOW DO YOU MEASURE IT? HOW DO YOU HOLD THE P E P U D ACCOUNTABLE? TO ANNOUNCE STANDING BY. WHAT'S THAT? OH, I'M SO SORRY. YEAH. LET ME LET ME GO AHEAD AND GRAB THAT ONE FIRST. UM THAT'S AN OUTSTANDING QUESTION. WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU IS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UNDER CHAPTER 1 63 UNDER FLORIDA LAW, UM AND OURS. CERTAINLY SATISFIES THIS AND. EVERY EVERY OTHER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE STATE. IT IS IT IS MUCH MORE THAN A VISION. THERE ARE PIECES THAT THAT READ A LITTLE BIT MORE ASPIRATIONAL OR VISION SOUNDING . BUT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF, UH HARD AND FAST, YOU KNOW, HARD.

OBJECTIVE METRICS SET OUT IN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALL OVER THE PLACE, PARTICULARLY IN OUR FUTURE LAND USE, UM, ELEMENT, BUT ALSO THROUGHOUT ALL OF THE REST. FOR EXAMPLE, FOR EACH OF OUR FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES WE HAVE, UH, MINIMUM WE SET MINIMUMS CAN'T REMEMBER. WE CERTAINLY HAVE MAXIMUM DENSITIES. AH THAT IS REQUIRED UNDER THE STATUTE. WE HAVE MAXIMUM DENSITIES, UH, FOR EACH OF THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT TENDS TO BE ONE OF THE PRIMARY METRICS. WE HAVE LEVELS OF SERVICE AND THIS IS INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT. THIS TIES INTO ALL SORTS OF OTHER THINGS, SUCH AS CONCURRENCY AND ULTIMATELY IMPACT THESE WHEN THEY COME BEFORE YOU, THEY ALL DERIVE OUT OF THE OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS THAT COME OUT OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO WE HAVE LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR PARKS FOR ROADS FOR ALL MANNER OF FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR ALL MANNER OF DIFFERENT, UM, OBJECTIVELY MEASURABLE THINGS THAT ALL ARE DRIVEN BY ADDING NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE OF COMMERCIAL SPACE OR ADDING NEW HUMAN BEING RESIDENTS TO THE VILLAGE. SO THOSE ARE THE TYPES OF THINGS AND, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES COMPREHENSIVE PLANS.

GET INTO THE WEEDS TO SOME DEGREE, UM, AND IT'S REQUIRED TO, FOR EXAMPLE, WITH OUR, UH, FUTURE LAND USE DISTRICTS. IT SPECIFIES THE GENERAL CATEGORIES OF USE THAT YOU CAN HAVE SO WE COULD NOT HAVE A P U D THAT WOULD GO ON TO, UM AND I FORGET OUR DESIGNATIONS RIGHT NOW, BUT BASICALLY AN INCREDIBLY ONE OF OUR FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS THAT IS FOR VERY LOW DENSITY, RESIDENTIAL AND SEMI AGRICULTURE. YOU COULD NOT GO PUTTING, UH, YOU KNOW A HIGH DENSITY, MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON IT, AND YOU COULD NOT GO PUTTING IN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON IT. EVEN IF YOU DID A P U D SO THERE THERE ARE A GREAT DEAL OF RAILS THAT ARE BUILT INTO OUR COMP PLAN. UH THERE BUT THOSE THOSE STAND AS MINIMUMS. I WILL TELL YOU AS WELL THAT WITH REGARD TO P U. D S AND IT'S HOW WE TEND TO DO IT AROUND THE STATE AND HOW WE DID IT IN THE TERRA LAGO P U D AGREEMENT. UM IT IS. WE SAY IT'S A SELF CONTAINED ZONING CODE OR SELF CONTAINED DRS. IN REALITY, WHAT ENDS UP BEING AS YOU END UP WITH EITHER FIVE PAGES, 10 PAGES OR 90 PAGES IN THE CASE OF TERRA LAGO OF SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS . AND THEN IT SAYS, WHERE NOT MODIFIED IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS APPLY. SO THEN WE'RE SUBSUMING IN THOSE HUNDREDS OF PAGES OF REGULATIONS THAT EVERYBODY SPENT A LONG TIME WORKING ON INTO IT JUST AS MODIFIED IN THAT P U D AGREEMENT, SO IT'S NOT LIKE THERE IS A VACUUM OF REGULATION

[01:00:02]

ON THESE PDS. OFTENTIMES THEY'RE SUBJECT TO MORE REGULATION. THEN THEY WOULD BE UNDER STRAIGHT ZONING, BUT THEY DEVELOPERS CONSIDER THAT A TRADE OFF FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOME MORE CREATIVE THINGS. WELL I KNOW WHEN SOMETHING, SAYS FOUR FT. YOU KNOW YOU CAN'T REALLY ARGUE , BECAUSE EVERYBODY CAN MEASURE FOR FEET. BUT IF ALL THE NUMBERS ARE IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT RULES I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU MEASURE THAT, YOU KNOW, IN OTHER WORDS, UM PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWPOINTS. ONCE IT'S YOU DON'T HAVE A NUMBER. ANYWAY THANK YOU SAID THERE ARE A GREAT DEAL OF NUMBERS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT ARE OBJECTIVELY MEASURABLE AND ENFORCEABLE WITH RESPECT OF THE LD, R S AND ANY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU. MHM. ARE THERE OTHER ANY OTHER COMMENTS BOARD? OKAY? SO WE'RE. FOLDING THAT, YEAH. TO CONTINUE. CONTINUE THE ITEMS. OKAY ALRIGHT. SEE MEANING. I WAS JUST WONDERING ABOUT LIKE THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OR THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION IF THOSE DISSOLVE UM, WHAT HAPPENS AND WHAT TIME DO YOU HOW DO YOU DECIDE WHAT'S HAPPENING? UM WHAT IS THERE A DEFINITION OF WHEN THEY'RE NO LONGER FUNCTIONING? THEY ALLOW THE VILLAGE ATTORNEY TO ANSWER THAT ONE. YEAH AND THAT THAT'S THAT'S A LITTLE FAR A FIELD OF ANYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH THE P U D S HERE. BUT UH, THE AS I UNDERSTAND, AND I DON'T DO RACHEL A LAW EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, BUT, UM UH, ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW WHAT I WOULD RATHER GIVE YOU LESS OF AN ANSWER THAN A WRONG ONE. UM, WHEN MM. VAGUELY RECALLING THAT THERE THERE ARE, UM. THAT THE STATE AGENCY THAT THAT, UM STEPS IN WHEN THERE ARE HOH DISPUTES. UM YOU KNOW, PROVIDE SOME ASSISTANCE ALONG THOSE LINES.

BUT REALLY H OAS ARE PRIVATE ASSOCIATIONS AMONG THE. PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN A NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT, WHETHER IT'S THE VILLAGE OR THE COUNTY DON'T GENERALLY GET INVOLVED WITH ANY OF THOSE MATTERS OR TAKING OVER UPKEEP, FOR EXAMPLE OF. OF WHAT ARE OR WERE COMMON ELEMENTS WITHIN AN H O A OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. UM. SO IT'S NOT LIKE IT'S LEGALLY AUTOMATIC THAT IT FALLS THROUGH THE VILLAGE TO DEAL WITH AN ISSUE IF IT HAD BEEN AN H O. A ISSUING THE H O A HAS GONE DEFUNCT. I KNOW THAT DIDN'T COMPLETELY ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. BUT THAT'S PROBABLY ABOUT AS MUCH AS I THINK I COULD DIVE INTO THANK YOU TURN AWAY. OKAY. ARE WE READY TO VOTE? WHICH MEANING? ARE WE CONTINUING THIS TOO? DEPENDS ON WHAT. I THOUGHT WE WEREN'T GOING TO VOTE. WELL, WE WADE, COULD WE JUST WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION RATHER THAN.

CONTINUE IT BECAUSE IF IT TAKES US LONGER, TO ADDRESS SOME OF THESE QUESTIONS, AND IF WE GET MORE QUESTIONS I MEAN, WELL, I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW THAT WE OUGHT TO WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION. I MEAN, IF WE GET MORE GOOD COMMENTS AS WE WORK THROUGH THIS, WE'VE GOT TO DO IT. WE'LL JUST IN MAY ASK HIM. HEY WE GOT GOOD STUFF WORK AND GIVE US ANOTHER MONTH. I I'D RECOMMEND WE JUST, UM CONTINUE IT, TOO. MAY FOR RIGHT NOW. THAT WOULD BE MAY 5TH.

I LIKE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT APPLICATION NUMBER LD R DASH 22-8 B CONTINUED UNTIL NEXT MEETING WHICH IS MAY 5TH 2022 SECONDS. BOARD MEMBER BANKS. YES REMEMBER, PEREZ? YES REMEMBER

[01:05:01]

PRESSLER? YES, REMEMBERS A HAYEK. YES. REMEMBER WILLIAMS? MILEY YES, CHAIR PALMER. OKAY

[DIRECTOR'S REPORT]

ARE WE READY FOR THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT? YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. SO I'LL BE REPORTING TO YOU YOUR MONTHLY STATUS REPORT. YOU DID RECEIVE AN UPDATED ATTENDANCE RECORD FOR YOUR MEETINGS AND THIS PARTICULAR CALENDAR YEAR. ARE YOU RECEIVED CURRENT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY. AN UPDATE ON YOUR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. WE CANNOT READ THIS FROM HERE. BUT I WILL SAY THAT WE HAVE PERFECT ATTENDANCE TO DATE. AND YOU DON'T HAVE A FULL BOARD TO WELCOME OUR NEWEST MEMBER. MEMBER PEREZ. SO IN TERMS OF, UH , PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

WE CAN NOW CROSS CASA VEGA OFF THAT LIST. I BELIEVE THEY HAVE RECEIVED THEIR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. TRACTOR SUPPLY IS ALSO NEARING THAT FINISH LINE FOR ITS CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, BUT STILL IN REVIEW. WE HAVE SEMINAL JUNCTION. WE HAVE PARKVIEW APARTMENTS, RCC CONSTRUCTION, WHICH IS AN INDUSTRIAL PROJECT. AND AS YOU KNOW, WE HAD TERRA LAGO. MASTER PLAN AND PHASE ONE. A SITE PLAN APPROVED BACK IN DECEMBER. YEAH, YOU WOULD. LIKE TO KNOW. HOPEFULLY IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS, GREEN CARBON SOLUTIONS OUT ON FOX BROWN ROAD.

AH, MAYBE BREAKING GROUND. THEY ARE CLOSE TO RECEIVING A BUILDING PERMIT AS WELL WITHIN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS. DEPENDING ON THEIR NEXT RECENT MIDDLE, BUT I KNOW THEY'RE ADDRESSING THE BUILDING OFFICIALS COMMENTS AT THIS TIME. IN TERMS OF YOUR EXISTING GOALS AND ACHIEVEMENTS, MOST OF US WERE ABLE TO ATTEND THE FIELD TRIP AND ST LUCIE COUNTY. AND. I HAVE ANOTHER ITEM ACTUALLY UPCOMING FOR YOU ALL TO VIRTUALLY ATTEND ANOTHER MEETING , AND I'LL BE SENDING THAT TO YOU IN THE MORNING. I'LL MAKE MYSELF A NOTE NOW. AND YOUR STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION. WE HAVE JUST COMPLETED OR THE VILLAGE MANAGER AND COUNCIL, ALONG WITH STAFF HAS JUST COMPLETED ITS STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION FOR THE VILLAGE AS A WHOLE. ON APRIL 2ND. AND SO NOW IS AN APPROPRIATE TIME IS THAT DRAFT IS FORMULATED FOR US TO SET UP A MEETING FOR YOU AND HAVE A STRATEGIC FINDING SESSION AS WELL. OUT WE DID SET A GOAL TO ALSO ATTEND. SOME STAFF HOSTED WORKSHOPS. SO I AM LOOKING. FOR YOUR INPUT. IF YOU HAVE SPECIFIC TOPICS YOU WANT TO HEAR ABOUT AND STAFF CAN DO. UM SOME RESEARCH ON THOSE TOPICS AS THEY RELATE TO THE VILLAGE. IF YOU DON'T HAVE THEM WITH YOU TONIGHT, YOU CAN TEXT ME OR EMAIL ME YOUR SUGGESTIONS. SO COMING IN MAY. THIS IS ALREADY CHANGED. WE WILL BE SEEING THE P U D ORDINANCE. AND THE LIVE WORK UNITS. AND THREE MITIGATION AND TREAT MITIGATION FUND. UPCOMING IN JUNE. WE HOPE TO BRING THE WORKSHOP TO YOU KNOW APPLICATIONS JUST YET. SO AGAIN IF YOU HAVE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A TOPIC, PLEASE LET US KNOW. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS MONTH'S REPORT? I HAVE ONE COMMENT ON A SEPARATE ISSUE. I DIDN'T KNOW IF WE WERE NEARING THE END. BUT WHEN YOU'RE DONE IF I HAD MADE WITH THE CHAIRS, PERMISSION GO AHEAD. WHAT HE WANTS TO SPEAK AT THE END OF THE OH YEAH, NO PROBLEM. NOT A PROBLEM. ANY OTHER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THE ON YOUR LAST SLIDE. YOU HAD SOMETHING ABOUT, UH FINISHED FLOOR CRITERIA. THAT

[01:10:10]

WON'T BE COMING IN MAY. IT WON'T BE COMING IN MAY. NO I WOULD NOT LIKE TO BRING THIS BOARD. FIVE OR SIX. AMENDMENTS AT ONE TIME IT IS IT CAN BE NOT JUST OVERWHELMING FOR THE BOARD TO DIGEST BUT OVERWHELMING FOR STAFF TO PROCESS AND DO THOSE. THE RESEARCH AND THE WORK TO PULL TOGETHER THE ORDINANCES AND OTHER ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS. WHAT? WHAT I MEAN, MAYBE I'M JUST LOST HERE. BUT WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? FINISHED FLOOR CRITERIA. BASICALLY ESTABLISHES THE HEIGHT OF THE THEY MINIMUM HEIGHT. WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TILE FLOOR. THAT'S A FINISHED FLOOR, MINIMUM HEIGHT FLOOR IN A STRUCTURE. YEAH AND IT'S RELATED TO LIKE A FLOODING ISSUE, TOO.

ESTABLISHED THE MINIMUM HEIGHT MHM SO THAT THE BUILDING DOESN'T FLAG WHICH IS RELATED TO LIKE HOW MUCH FILL DIRT SOMEBODY WOULD HAVE TO BRING IN IN RELATION TO THE ROAD. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE IS THAT HOW THAT'S MEASURED? IT'S MEASURED. THE COLD WILL DEFINE HOW IT'S MEASURED. UH TYPICALLY FROM, UH , THE CROWN OF THE CENTER OF THE ADJACENT ROAD. I BELIEVE IT'S HOW IT RIGHT DEFINED RIGHT. BUT WE WON'T BE BRINGING THAT TO YOU. OKAY WELL, I'M JUST UNDERSTANDING THE TERMINOLOGY, YOU KNOW. YEAH FINISHED FINISHED FLOOR CRITERIA. THAT'S THAT'S IN REFERENCE TO ESTABLISHING AS OBVIOUS, SAID THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION. THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ESTABLISHES A MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION, BUT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE ALLOWED TO ESTABLISH, UH, A HIGHER FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION AGAIN THAT ALL GOES TO, UM AH FLOODPLAIN ISSUES AND FLOOD MITIGATION AND SO ON. YOU TEND TO YOU TEND TO FIND, FOR EXAMPLE. IN COASTAL AREAS, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WILL SET FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS, UH, SOMETIMES SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER THAN THE FLORIDA BUILDING, CODE MINIMUM AND, UM IN CERTAIN AREAS , EVEN INLAND LIKE AN INDIAN TOWN. THERE MAY BE GOOD REASON TO SET FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION IS SOMETHING THAT EXCEEDS THE UM FOR BUILDING CODE MINIMUM FOR FLOODING PURPOSES. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I FINISHED, UM YES, MADAM CHAIR. OKAY UM, UH, YOU'RE WELCOME BOARD MEMBERS OF HAYATE. AH! CAN EVERYBODY HEAR ME? UM THERE IS A GAZEBO THAT HAS BEEN FINISHED. THE CONSTRUCTION OF AT THE VILLAGE SQUARE TO WHERE THE DUNKIN DONUTS PLAZA IS. AND THE THERE'S GOING TO BE A, UH, DEDICATION TO THE THREE INDIVIDUALS THAT SIGNED THEIR NAMES TO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWNS, INCORPORATION PAPERS. THOSE INDIVIDUALS THOSE COURAGEOUS INDIVIDUALS IF I MAY ADD, OR EVA MARTINEZ, FILLMORE WATERS AND ART MATTSON THEY WANTED TO PLAN A DEDICATION OF SOME SORT TO THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND AGAIN, WHICH THE GAZEBO WILL BE DEDICATED TO, AND I JUST WANTED TO INVITE EVERYBODY ON THIS BOARD. MISS PALMER. MISS MILEY, MS. BANKS MUST PRESSLER, MR. WILLIAMS MISS EVERMAN, EVERYBODY AT STAFF, EVERYBODY AT COUNCIL AND I JUST IF I COULD JUST ASK THE VILLAGE CLERK OR SOMEONE FROM STAFF TO JUST COME UP WITH SOME DATES. UM THAT WORKS FOR EVERYBODY. IT SHOULD BE A NICE. AH, CELEBRATION THERE AND JUST WANT TO INVITE EVERYBODY AND THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. THANK YOU, MEMBER, SORAYA. ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY OTHER CONCERNS BEFORE WE ADJOURN? OKAY? THIS ME

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.