Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:01]

SORRY. WE HAVE ACCOUNT TO ORDER MY PC, A BOARD MEETING. OH, MY SORRY. WE'RE CALLING ME TO ORDER

[CALL TO ORDER]

OUR PCB BOARD MEETING. UM MARCH 3RD. WE HAVE OUR ROLL CALL. CHAIR PALMER. PRESIDENT PLACE CHAIR MILEY YEAH. BOARD MEMBER BANKS, PRESIDENT FOR MEMBER PRESSLER HERE. BOARD MEMBER. SO HAYEK YEP. REMEMBER WILLIAMS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, AND WE'LL HAVE OUR INVOCATION BY, UM MR MELTON WILL CHAIR MILTON WILLIAMS. I'M SORRY MEMBER WILLIAMS, REMEMBER? LOWER HERE, PLEASE. FATHER GOD IN HEAVEN. WE COME NOW. MANY THANKS FOR LIFE. BEING SO GOOD AND OKAY? ABILITY TO SEE. ACTION YOU HAVE A FILE TO LET THE WORDS ABOUT MOUTH AND THE MEDITATION BY HEART. BE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SIGHT. OH, LORD, OUR STRENGTH AND ALREADY IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF THESE.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, PLEASE. OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION. UNDER GUARD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. APPROVAL OF AGENDA. CHAIR. STAFF WOULD REQUEST THAT. IN APPROVING THE AGENDA THAT ITEMS THREE AND FOUR

[APPROVAL OF AGENDA ]

BE MOVED TO THE END OF THE REGULAR AGENDA. YES. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. AS AMENDED. AS AMENDED. YES, THANK YOU. SOMEBODY 2ND 2ND. BOARD MEMBER BANKS. PERSON. YES. BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER. YES. FOUR MEMBERS THAT HAYEK YES. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS YES, VICE CHAIR OF MILEY YES. PALMER. YES. SO THAT'S FOR OUR APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 2ND AND 3RD DECEMBER SECOND IN FEBRUARY, 3RD. SO WE NEED TO DO THAT, RIGHT? THAT'S WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN DONE. THAT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED YET. OKAY? IT'S JUST A REGULAR AGENDA. CORRECT

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

OK? YES OK, SO THE PROOF OF MINUTES. FOR ITEMS ONE AND TWO. I NEED SOMEBODY MAKING MOTION. I LIKE TO MAKE AN EMOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE MEETING ON DECEMBER 2ND 2021, AS WELL AS FEBRUARY 3RD 2022. SECOND, OKAY? BOARD MEMBER BANKS. YES FOR MEMBER PRESSLER.

YES. FOR MEMBERS TO HAYEK. YES. REMEMBER WILLIAMS? YES. VICE CHAIR. MILEY YES, PALMER. YES.

OKAY? SO I SPENT MOVED IN SECOND. SO WE'RE GOING TO PROCEED TO ITEMS FOR. ITEM 553

[5.  

Application No. LDR-21-8122 - A request to Amend the Village of Indiantown Land Development Regulations to Establish an Efficient Process for the Review and Approval of Special Event Applications.

]

AND FOUR TO THE END OF OKAY, THREE AND FOUR. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY, SO, UM I DON'T FIVE APPLICATION NUMBER L D R 21 81 22 REQUEST TO AMEND THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION TO ESTABLISH AN EFFICIENT PROCESS. FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL. SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATIONS. DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THERE? I WAS ASKING THAT THIS ITEM WOULD BE CONTINUED TO THE APRIL SEVEN. REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THIS BOARD. OKAY? OKAY? IF YOU

[00:05:08]

COULD JUST FOR THE RECORD IF SOMEONE COULD MOVE TO CONTINUE IT TODAY. I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE TO CONTINUE. L D R 21. THAT'S 80 81 22. UM TO OUR NEXT MEETING OF APRIL 7 2022. OKAY, A SECOND.

YOU. REMEMBER BANKS. YES. FOR A MEMBER PRESSLER. YES. BOARD MEMBERS ARE HAYEK. YES I REMEMBER. WILLIAMS. YES. NICE CHAIR, MILEY. YES. CHAIR. PALMER? YES. OKAY? SO IT HAS

[6.  

Application No. LDR-22-003 - A Request to Amend The Indiantown Land Development Regulations to Make Revisions to the Permitted Use Table and Related Provisions. 

]

BEEN MOVED IN SECOND, UM, ITEM SIX. EXCUSE ME. APPLICATION NUMBER LD R 22-3 REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO MAKE REVISIONS TO THE PERMITTED USE TABLE AND RELATED PROVISIONS. DISCUSSION. THOUGHT AT THE STAFF WOULD LIKE TO GIVE A PRESENTATION JUST TO BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE ITEM. BEFORE YOU CURRENTLY WE HAVE. ITEMS THAT ARE ACTUALLY PERMITTED WITHIN ECONOMICS USE DISTRICT THAT ARE NOT SPECIFY AND I USED TABLE.

THE AMENDMENTS WE BRING TO YOU TONIGHT EFFECT. PRIMARILY THAT PARTICULAR ZONING CATEGORY. OUR DISTRICT. AND IT IS AFTER A REVIEW OF OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND A DETERMINATION BY STAFF FOR CLARIFICATION. THAT WE'RE MAKING THESE CHANGES. SO WHAT YOU'LL SEE EFFECTED IS SOME OF THE RESIDENTIAL USES, SUCH AS ACCESSORY DWELLINGS, DUPLEXES AND SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS. NEXT SIDE. AND PUBLIC ASSEMBLY PLACES OF WORSHIP. AND COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. UM THOSE HAVE TO BE TREATED EQUALLY ACROSS LIKE DISTRICTS NEXT FIVE. THE L D ARMAMENT PROCESS. YOU KNOW, WE BRING IT HERE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL THEN WELL EITHER THROUGH OR DENIED IS TODAY APPROVED THE ORDINANCE AT FIRST HEARING SCHEDULED SECOND READING, AND IT WOULD BECOME EFFECTIVE IF ADOPTED AT SECOND BREATHING OUTSIDE. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT YOU APPROVED THIS APPLICATION, WHICH WAS INITIATED BY THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION. AND IT AMENDS THE GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS. TO MAKE THE PERMITTED USE TABLE.

CONSISTENT WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NEXT SIDE. 70 NIGHT STAFF IS ASKING PHYSICAL BOARD TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE OR DENY THIS APPLICATION, WHICH WOULD REVISE THE PERMITTED USE TABLE AND RELATED PROVISIONS FOR CONSISTENCY. WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. YOU HAD IT YOUR SEATS TONIGHT. A HANDOUT. THAT LOOKS VERY SIMILAR. TO WHAT YOU RECEIVING YOUR PACKETS. IT WOULD NOT BE IN YOUR NOTEBOOK. IT WOULD BE AT YOUR YOUR SEATS.

IT IS THE ORDINANCE FOR THIS ITEM. UPON SPEAKING WITH THE VILLAGE OF COUNTY TODAY. WE'VE MADE SOME ADDITIONS TO THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE. AND THOSE ADDITIONS ARE GREEN. FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE. THERE'S A COPY OF THE FRONT TABLE WHERE YOU CAME IN. ANY CHANGES ARE IN GREEN. THAT HAVE BEEN MADE CENTURIES. STEVE, YOU'RE YOUR COFFEE AND YOUR PATH. SO WITH THOSE EDITIONS IN GREEN, YOU'LL SEE SOME NEW DEFINITIONS PROPOSED. AND THESE ARE FOR CLARIFICATION ON. SO THERE'S A DEFINITION NOW FOR CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY TRADES. A NEW PROPOSED DEFINITION FOR TRADES AND SKILLED SERVICES. A NEW PROPOSED DEFINITION FOR WHOLESALE TRADES AND SERVICES. WITH REGARD TO THE PERMITTED USE TABLE ITSELF. YOU WILL SEE THOSE VERY SAME YOU FIND USES. INDICATED IN THE TABLE. FOR MANY USES AND. WHAT I'LL SAY WITH REGARD TO THE DEFINITIONS. THEY ARE. EXACT MATCHES. I BELIEVE OF WHAT WAS IN OUR TRANSITION CODE, WHICH IS THE MARTIN COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION. SO THIS MAINTAINS THAT CONSISTENCY

[00:10:04]

BETWEEN WHAT WE ALREADY HAD IN PLACE. AND WHAT WE HAVE IN PLACE TODAY. AND WE THINK IT'S A GOOD ADDITION TO OUR CODE TO HELP ROUND OUT ARE PERMITTED YOU STABLE. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE CHANGES IN GREEN WAS THERE. THOSE ARE TINY. DO YOU HAVE ANY YOU'VE SUMMARIZED IT EXCELLENTLY, AND WE'RE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON THE ORDINANCE AS A WHOLE OR ANY OF THE ADDITIONAL GREEN LANGUAGE. I JUST. HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. I NOTICED THAT IN THE PERMITTED USE TABLE PAGE 41 THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS SUMMARY. I SEE THERE YOU HAVE A VETERINARY CLINIC LISTED NO OUTDOOR KENNELS. BUT YOU HAVE THE DOGGIE DAYCARE KENNEL. IT DIDN'T DESIGNATE, YOU KNOW THAT YOU COULD OR COULD NOT HAVE OUTDOOR KENNELS THERE. WOULDN'T THEY BE UNDER THE SAME RESTRICTIONS? IF IT'S NOT INDICATED THERE. WELL LET'S LET'S TAKE A LOOK AND GIVE ME ONE SECOND TO DIG INTO, UM. DIG INTO OUR CODE, BECAUSE THINK ABOUT USE TABLES. THEY'RE VERY HELPFUL. THE VERY EASY TO LOOK UP. BUT THEN YOU GOT TO GO DIG DEEPER AND LOOK AT ALL THE STUFF. THE THAT NO OUTDOOR KENNELS WAS PARTICULARLY CALLED OUT. I REMEMBER WHEN WE WERE WHEN THE ELDERS WERE BEING PUT TOGETHER TO MAKE CRYSTAL CLEAR. THAT WOULDN'T BE. I'VE GOT SOMETHING IN THE BACK OF MY HEAD THAT SAYS DOGGIE DAYCARE. ALSO IN IN THE DESCRIPTION OF IT SPECIFIES THE SAME THING. LET ME DIG INTO IT. JUST A MINUTE. SO IF ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, I'D BE GLAD TO DO A LITTLE DIGGING WELL WAY QUESTION I WANTED TO ASK ABOUT WAS AT THE TOP. WHERE YOU SAY, UM TO ENSURE THE STABILITY OF ADJACENT AND NEARBY RESIDENTIAL AREAS. UM HOW IS THIS GOAL ACCOMPLISHED? BY WHAT? MEASUREMENT? UM. YOU KNOW WHEN YOU SAY STABILITY OF AGE ADJACENT AND NEARBY RESIDENTIAL AREAS YOU WANT TO ENSURE THAT HOW IS IT DEFINED? HOW IS IT ACCOMPLISHED SO THAT YOUR FELLOW MEMBERS CAN FOLLOW WHITE NUMBER PRESS IS REFERRING TO IS THE TEXT AND THE STAFF REPORT. THAT CITES THE COMPETENCE OF LAND USE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENTS. AND IT GIVES US SOME DETAIL IN THAT PARTICULAR POLICY. ABOUT THE PURPOSE OF. THINK THE CANAL MIXED USE DISTRICT AND SO WHAT? PRESS WHAT MEMBER PRESSLER'S ASKING IS HOW DO WE MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE PROTECTING THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO CONTAMINATION? AND MY ANSWER TO YOU WOULD BE THAT THAT'S DONE THROUGH OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE COVE NOT PERMITTED USE TABLE. THERE ARE SPECIFIC REGULATIONS. THAT WOULD BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE SEPARATE DISTRICTS TO ENSURE THAT THAT PRESERVATION IS IMPLEMENTED. OKAY? THANK YOU.

YOU'RE WELCOME AND CHAIR. I CAN I CAN ADDRESS THE KENNEL DOGGY DAYCARE. UM BIT HERE AS YOU'LL SEE IN THE PERMITTED USE TABLE. KENNELS AND DOGGIE DAYCARES ARE ONLY ALLOWED AS EITHER A CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL EXCEPTION . USE IN ALL THOSE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES, INCLUDING THE ONE BEING ADDED RELATING TO CANAL MAKES USE. WHAT THAT IN GENERAL TERMS MEANS IS THROUGH ONE PROCESS OR ANOTHER. UNDER OUR CODE. IT'S GOING TO THAT USE IS GOING TO BE RUN THROUGH AN EVALUATION PROCESS TO MAKE SURE YET COMPLIES WITH OUR CODE AND OTHERWISE DOES NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT SURROUNDING USES. WE HAVE PRECISE UM AH. CONDITIONAL USE RESTRICTIONS IN OUR CODE RELATING TO DOGGIE DAYCARE ENDED ADDRESSES, OUTDOOR KENNELS AND OUTDOOR DOG RUNS. IT BASICALLY HAS A NUMBER OF CRITERIA THAT DEPEND ON IT VARIES ON HOW MANY FEET HOW MANY HUNDREDS OF FEET.

IT IS FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE. OKAY, SO IF BASICALLY, AND THIS IS JUST SCANNING OVER IT. UM IF IT'S MORE THAN 300 FT FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE THAN UM, THEN YOU CAN HAVE AN OUTDOOR DOG RUN, BUT IT CAN ONLY BE USED DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS AND ONLY IN CERTAIN AREAS AND ALL OF THIS, SO THERE ARE A LOT OF CRITERIA LAID OUT IN THE CODE WITH REGARD TO HOW THAT'S IMPLEMENTED, SO IT

[00:15:04]

GETS INTO THE WEEDS A LITTLE BIT MORE. THE OTHER ONE THAT CALL OUT OF THAT PARENTHETICAL ABOUT VETERINARY CLINIC, NO OUTDOOR KENNELS THAT THAT WAS AGAIN JUST PUT IN THERE TO MAKE A LITTLE BIT MORE. CLEAR THAT THAT WASN'T KIND OF A BACK DOORWAY TO HAVE, UM KENNELS SEPARATE AND APART FROM OUR REGULATIONS FOR DOGGIE DAYCARE. AND COULD YOU SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THE AQUACULTURE ? I SEE THAT IT'S PERMITTED, LIKE WHAT IS THAT? UM WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THERE? SURE. ME FIRST. SEE IF WE DEFINE IT IN THE COLD. THINK WE DO AND THEY'RE FROM THAT. I THINK WE.

I CAN GIVE YOU A MORE GENERAL DEFINITION. IF I CAN'T TRACK IT DOWN OTHERWISE. WE DO NOT. WE WOULD DEFER TO A GENERAL DEFINITION. MM HMM. THE WE HAVEE CULTURE WITHIN THE CODE, AND IT'S IN THE CONTEXT OF AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES AND IT'O CATEGORIZE IT AS AN AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY. I WILL GIVE YOU A I CAN GIVE YOU I'LL GIVE YOU CAN GET AND I CAN GIVE YOU A MARTIN COUNTY. DEFINITION WHICH MATCHES UP TO THAT ALMOST EXACTLY? MARTIN COUNTY'S LD. R S DEFINED AQUACULTURE, AND THIS IS THIS IS A GENERALLY ACCURATE DEFINITION ACROSS MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS.

THE COMMERCIAL CULTIVATION OF AQUATIC LIFE SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO FISH, SHELLFISH AND SEAWEED. IT'S. WHAT YOU SEE, IMPLEMENTED THROUGHOUT A LOT OF THESE USES HERE IS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF WHAT ARE CALLED WATER RELATED OR MARINA MARINA RELATED USES AND AQUACULTURE WOULD BE ONE THAT WOULD SQUARELY FALL WITHIN THAT, OF COURSE, ALL OF THAT'S GOING TO BE SUBJECT TO THE INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF REGULATION THAT COMES WITH BEING ADJACENT TO AN ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONTROL CANAL . SO YOU KNOW HOW ANY OF THAT WOULD PLAY OUT IS ANOTHER MATTER. THANK YOU. AND SHERIFF IF THERE AREN'T ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS, I'D RECOMMEND YOU OPEN UP. REPUBLIC COMMENT. YES, SIR. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? YES, MADAM CHAIR. I HAVE HOW MUCH OF THIS IS ROBERT BOB RAINS? GOOD EVENING. FOR THE RECORD. MY NAME IS BOB RAINS. I'M A LANDES, ATTORNEY WITH THE DUNSTER LAW FIRM HERE IN STUART. AND PLEASED TO BE HERE THIS EVENING REPRESENTING SCOTT WATSON AND I TOWN AND THREE LITTLE INDIANS. UH MR WATSON OWNS PROPERTY ALONG THE CANAL. AS I THINK MANY OF YOU ARE PROBABLY AWARE AND HE HAD SOME CONCERNS THAT WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH MR ROSS AND MS JEFFERSON ON REGARDING SOME OF THE USES WITHIN THE CANAL DISTRICT AND THE LACK OF SOME OF THOSE USES, AND, UH, WE'VE HAD NUMEROUS CALLS OVER THE LAST SIX OR SEVEN MONTHS WITH MR VOS AND MR JEFFERSON. THEY'VE BEEN VERY HELPFUL AND TRYING TO ADD SOME OF THESE USES IN THAT WE BELIEVE WERE APPROPRIATE AND ALSO TO CLARIFY SOME OF THE USES AS TO WHAT CAN BE DONE IN THAT DISTRICT. SO WE DO APPRECIATE THE EFFORT THAT'S BEING MADE ON BEHALF OF THIS TRYING TO ADDRESS HIS CONCERNS. MR BOASTED SHARE WITH ME, UH, EARLIER TODAY BEFORE THE MEETING THE GREEN EDITIONS TOO. THE ORDINANCE, WHICH I WILL PASS ALONG. I HAVEN'T HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO PASS THEM ALONG TO MR WATSON YET, BUT I WILL CERTAINLY DO THAT, AND I DO THINK THAT THEY COULD BE VERY HELPFUL IN ADDRESSING SOME OF OUR CONCERNS. AND THEN WE STILL HAVE ONE OR TWO ITEMS THAT WE'RE STILL WORKING WITH YOUR STAFF ON TO GET CLARIFICATION ON THAT I DON'T THINK YOU'RE ADDRESSED HERE TONIGHT, BUT ARE BEING TRYING TO BE ADDRESSED THROUGH ANOTHER VEHICLE, SO WE APPRECIATE COMMENTS. WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE OBVIOUSLY, TO MONITOR THIS AS WE GO FORWARD TO BE A PART OF THE PROCESS, BUT WE DO APPRECIATE THE EFFORTS BEING MADE TO GET THIS ADDRESS. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND ALSO YOUR STAFF. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS ? NO, MADAM CHAIR, OKAY? OKAY, SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO. MADAM SURE.

[00:20:12]

I'M SORRY. OH YEAH. NO, NO PROBLEM. SO IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE MATTER NOW WOULD BE THE POINT IF IT WERE THE WILL OF THE BOARD TO MAKE A MOTION TO, FOR EXAMPLE, RECOMMEND THIS ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, OKAY. WITH ANY SOMEONE TO MAKE A MOTION. INTO SECOND.

CORRECT.

A SECOND. OKAY. IT'S BEEN. MOVED AND SECONDED SAID JUST FOR CLARIFICATION FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE RECORD THAT THE MOTION ENCOMPASS THE DRAFT BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, WHICH INCLUDES THE GREEN CHANGES. YEAH, VERY GOOD. ALRIGHT WE'RE GOING TO MOVE OVER TO COVER UP. THAT'S OKAY. I GOT AHEAD OF MYSELF. CHAIR IT IT. CAN GET CONFUSING SOMETIMES WHAT YOU KNOW WHEN CONVERSATION. YOU KNOW, IT COMES TO A CLOSE AND SO ON WHEN CONVERSATION SEEMS TO COME TO A CLOSE, AND THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. JUST ASK THE CLERK TO ASK THE CLERK FOR REAL CALL VOTE. OKAY? THANK YOU.

ABSOLUTELY. FOR MEMBER BANKS. YES. BOARD MEMBER, PRESSLER. YES, BOARD MEMBER SUHAILA. YES.

REMEMBER WILLIAMS? YES. REMEMBER OUR VICE CHAIR? MILEY YES AND SHARE. PALMER. YES. OKAY. ITEM

[7.  

Application No. LDR-22-006 - A Request to Amend the Indiantown Land Development Regulations to Revise the Requirements for Home-Based Businesses, Pursuant to New Florida Laws.

]

SEVEN. APPLICATION NUMBER LD R DASH 22 THAT'S 006 REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO REVISE THE REQUIREMENTS OF POOR HOME BASED BUSINESS SINCE PURSUANT TO NEW FLORIDA LAWS. THERE AND DISCUSSIONS. STAFF, WAS IT.

I'M SORRY, IS THIS UM I'M GOING TO RAISE MY HAND HERE. DOES THIS PRESENTATION INVOLVED LIVING WORK AS WELL? NO. OKAY UM, MEMBERS, SAID HYATT. ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THAT COMMENT? MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE OKAY. GO AHEAD LIKE STAFF, GO AHEAD AND MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION AND THEN, OKAY PARTICULAR OKAY? SO WHAT WE HAVE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO COMPLY WITH THE NEW FLORIDA LAW, WHICH WAS PASSED IN THE LAST LEGISLATIVE SESSION, NOT THE CURRENT ONE AND BECAME EFFECTIVE LAST YEAR. AND BASICALLY THIS NEW LAW STATES THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CAN NO LONGER HAVE AS MUCH CONTROL OVER HOME BASED BUSINESSES WITH REGARD TO NUMBER ONE REQUIRING ADDITIONAL PARKING MORE THAN WHAT'S ACTUALLY REQUIRED FOR THE OTHER HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AH IN ADDITION TO THAT, IT LOOKS AT THINGS LIKE STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT AND WHERE BUSINESS VEHICLES ARE PART MANY CODES. WILL SAY YOU CAN'T PARK YOUR BUSINESS VEHICLE IN YOUR DRIVEWAY AND THAT SORT OF THING. WELL, NOW ARE, UM HANDS ARE TIED TO SOME EXTENT WITH REGARD TO SOME OF THESE ISSUES, AS LONG AS WE'RE HELPING TO MAINTAIN THE

[00:25:03]

CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY. UM, THAT IS THE GIST OF THIS, LORD THINK THAT WE REALLY SHOULDN'T REQUESTS ABOVE AND BEYOND ANYTHING THAT IS GOING TO CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY, SO BIAS REQUESTING MORE PARKING. THAT'S GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT WE CAN'T DO ANYMORE. CAN WE GET TO THE NEXT TIME? I THINK I'M CONFUSING. YOU GUYS. I THINK THE STAFF REPORT PROBABLY OUTLINED THERE'S A LITTLE BIT BETTER. AND WE GAVE SOME SPECIFICS WITH REGARD TO THE CHANGES. FORTUNATELY, OFF THE TOP OF MY HAND, SO IT WAS VEHICLES AND TRAILERS. WE LOOKED AT BUSINESS VEHICLES REQUIRED PARKING EXTERIOR I TALKED ABOUT, UM AS LONG AS THE RESIDENTIAL CHARACTERS MAINTAINED. WE CAN'TW SOMEONE IS RUNNING THEIR HOME BASED BUSINESS AND THEN AS FAR AS HEAVY EQUIPMENT STORAGE, WE CAN REGULATE, UM ANYTHING THAT'S VISIBLE FROM THE STREET ONLY.

GOING. COULD YOU REPEAT THAT? SORRY, YOU CAN WHAT? IN IN YOUR STAFF REPORT PROVIDED ON PAGE TWO OF THE STAFF REPORT PAGE 62 IN YOUR PACKET. WE GIVE AN OUTLINE IN THE ANALYSIS OF SOME OF THE ITEMS AFFECTED BY THE FLORIDA LAW, THE LAST ONE BEING HEAVY EQUIPMENT THAT THE VILLAGE CAN REGULATE STORAGE THAT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET ONLY. SS AFFECTED BY THIS NEW LAW AND THE ORDINANCE THAT IS BEING PROPOSED SHOWS IN STRIKETHROUGH WHAT'S BEING TAKEN OUT OF OUR CURRENT CODE AND AN UNDERLYING WHAT'S BEING ADDED IN AGAIN. THE PROCESS FOR AMENDING THE CODE IS THE SAME. WE PRESENT THIS TO YOU TONIGHT. YOU WILL OPEN THE HEARING TO THE PUBLIC FOR ANY COMMENTS THAT MAY BE OUT THERE AFTER YOU'VE TAKEN ON AFTER WE'VE TAKEN YOUR QUESTIONS. YOU ALL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL. AND ONCE IT GOES ON TO THEM, THEY COULD POSSIBLY HAVE TWO READINGS OF THE ORDINANCE TO APPROVE OR DENY IT. NEXT LINE. WE'RE RECOMMENDING TO APPROVE AS THIS IS STAFF INITIATED APPLICATION NEXT SLIDE. AND YOU MAY TAKE THE ACTION TO RECOMMEND THAT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL APPROVE OR DENY THIS APPLICATION, WHICH AUTHORIZES HOME BASED BUSINESSES TO OPERATE IN ALL AREAS ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE. AND TO MATCH ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THE NEW FLORIDA LAW. SO THAT WE'RE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW.

WITH THAT I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS NEXT LIFE. I HAVE A QUESTION. YOU READY FOR THE QUESTION? I WAS EXPLAINING. YES, GREAT. OKAY JUST FOR TO BE CLEAR. SO WE HAVE, UM BIZ, HOME BASED BUSINESSES. AND IF THEY HAVE HEAVY EQUIPMENT OR JUST. JUST OUTLAND. JUST STUFF. THAT WOULD REQUIRE THAT WOULD COME BECOME AN EYESORE, ESPECIALLY WITH WHAT THE NEW DEVELOPMENT FRIENDS THAT YOU GUYS WE HAVE PROVISIONS CURRENTLY IN OUR CODE THAT. SOMEONE CANNOT OPEN A USED CAR. SALES OR RENTAL CAR BUSINESS. ANY GIVEN NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S NOT A HOME BASED BUSINESS. HOME BASED BUSINESSES, SOMETHING THAT'S REALLY SECONDARY. TO ITS PRIMARY USE, WHICH IS THAT OUR RESIDENTS. ANT FALL UNDER THAT DEFINITION. SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. MAYBE A REALTOR HAS A HOME OFFICE AND ACCOUNTANT. UM. TRYING TO THINK OF ANOTHER EXAMPLE. A LANDSCAPER . THAT'S AN EXAMPLE WE HAVE HERE . WE HAVE LANDSCAPING COMPANIES , UM, THAT HAVE THEIR HOME ADDRESSES THEIR BUSINESS, BUT THEY DO WORK EVERYWHERE, RIGHT? NOT UNSURE TAKING QUESTIONS.

YES, WE ARE. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? UM PUBLIC COMING. I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY. IT'S OK. UM I WANT TO MENTION YOU KNOW WHERE YOU HAVE THE ON THIS PAGE TO THE SAME ONE. YOU HAD THE QUESTION ON, UM, ABOUT THE SPACES FOR PARKING. THAT IT ONLY BEYOND IMPROVED SURFACES. AND, UM.

[00:30:03]

ANYWAY I MENTIONED THAT YOU KNOW ONE PERSON'S IMPROVED, UM, SURFACES. NOT ANOTHER PERSON'S DEFINITION OF IMPROVED SURFACE. SO IS THAT DEFINED? UM MORE CLEARLY, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE IMPROVED SURFACE COULD BE ALMOST ANYTHING. PRESENTED. I THINK I WAS. THE THERE'S A REFERENCE IN THE CODE THAT IT HAS TO CONFORM TO THE PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS OF ANOTHER PROVISION IN THE CODE RELATING TO PARTNER, OKAY. ANOTHER PROVISION. ANOTHER PROVISION IN THE CODE RELATING TO PARKING. UM AND UH AS HEALTHY AND SAID, IT'S ALSO PURSUANT TO THE BUILDING CODE, SO IT WOULD BE. IT WOULD BE A PERMISSIBLE SERVICE. SAME SORT OF PERMISSIBLE SERVICE THAT WOULD BE PERMISSIBLE FOR A NEW RESIDENTS GOING IN OR FOR A NEW BUSINESS GOING IN. OKAY SO WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT PUTTING DOWN SHELL OR OR OR. DIRT MARIE. ANYTHING LIKE THAT? NO IT'S LITERALLY THE PROOF SURFACE THAT WOULD OTHERWISE CONFORMED WITH THE CODE. THANK YOU. AND THE OTHER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. I HAVE A QUESTION IN REGARDS TO SOMETHING THAT WAS ADDED INDICATING THAT THERE WOULD NEED TO BE AN ISSUANCE OF A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT. SO IF I WANTED TO PROVIDE HERE SERVICES OUT OF MY HOME. BEING THAT I WOULD ALREADY HAVE TO BE LICENSED BY THE STATE AND MEET THEIR GUIDELINES. WELL, GUYS HOME FOR MONEY. SO THIS MEANS THAT IN ADDITION TO ALL OF THAT, I HAVE ALSO HAVE A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPTS. OH, USING MY. YEAH SO YOU DIDN'T HEAR THE QUESTION? SOUNDS LIKE THEY DIDN'T HEAR. SURE YEAH, I'LL JUST REPEAT IT FOR THE RECORD, NOT BEING LED TO ANSWER. SO THE QUESTION WAS, IT HAD A HOME BASED BUSINESS LIKE HOME BASED HAIR SALON, HAIR STYLING AND SO ON. UM IN ADDITION TO STATE LICENSURE, WOULD YOU ALSO NEED A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT? THE ANSWER IS YES. OKAY. IN MARTIN COUNTY, UM MARTIN COUNTY CURRENTLY IMPOSES A REQUIREMENT TO PAY BUSINESS TAXES AND HAVE A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT. THE VILLAGE HAS NOT IMPLEMENTED A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT PROGRAM YET I THINK IT'S STILL EVALUATING WHETHER TO DO THAT PIECE OF IT. BUT IN ANY EVENT IT'S REQUIRED FOR ANY BUSINESS WITH IN MARTIN COUNTY, EITHER INSIDE OR OUTSIDE MUNICIPALITIES. A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT. IS DIFFERENT FROM A LICENSE. JUST GIVE YOU A LITTLE HISTORY WAY BACK IN THE DAY DECADES AGO, THE STATUTE USED TO REFER TO WHAT ARE NOW BTR IS BUSINESS TAX RECEIPTS AS WHAT ARE CALLED OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES. THAT WAS WILDLY CONFUSING TO EVERYBODY. OKAY BECAUSE THEY ASKED THIS EXACT QUESTION. HEY WHY DO I NEED A LICENSE FROM THE CITY OR THE COUNTY? I'VE GOT A LICENSE FROM THE STATE. THAT SHOULD BE BETTER, RIGHT? SO THEY REWROTE THAT STATUTE TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT IS A TAX REVENUE SOURCE. OKAY NOW I WILL TELL YOU THAT IT IS A TAX AND REVENUE SOURCE THAT USUALLY BUILT INTO ITS MECHANISM OF PAYING. IT IS A USEFUL OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE ARE IN FACT FOLLOWING THE LAW, AND THEY'RE DOING SOMETHING AT A GIVEN SPACE THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING CODE. OKAY BUT NEVERTHELESS, HAVING A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT IS AN INDICATION THAT YOU HAVE PAID YOUR TAX. NOT WHETHER OR NOT YOU ARE GETTING A RIGHT OR PRIVILEGE TO CONDUCT A CERTAIN PROVISIONS THAT COMES FROM THE STATE. RUSSIANS. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? WE DO NOT HAVE ANY MADAM CHAIR. KING.

OKAY SO I'M SORRY, MADAM CHAIR MEMBERS WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING. GO AHEAD. REMEMBER, SIR, I AM. YEAH. I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE VILLAGE ATTORNEY HERE. SOME OF OUR PROJECTS. UM SOME OF THE PROJECTS THAT I'VE WORKED ON HAVE LIVE WORK UNITS IN THIS. I KNOW THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS BASED TO HOME OCCUPATION. I MEAN , IF THERE IS A LIVE WORK UNIT COMPONENT TO THIS, UM I KNOW THAT I'M NOT REQUIRED TO, BUT I'D LIKE TO RECUSE MYSELF ON THE VOTE FOR THIS MATTER JUST ON THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICT. AND IF THAT'S OKAY WITH EVERYBODY. IT'S

[00:35:04]

DANIEL'S WITHIN YOUR PREROGATIVE TO DO SO. SO. I'D LIKE TO DO THAT. I'M GOING TO SHUT OFF MY VIDEO AND MUTE. MY, UM MIKE UNTIL THE NEXT ITEM COMES UP. OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR. HI. OKAY, SO. WE NEED A. EMOTION AND THE SECOND TO WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE THIS OR NOT. SO I AGREE WITH UPDATING THE, UM CURRENT. UM. L D. R S TO REFLECT THE CHANGE. SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR APPLICATION NUMBER LD R TWO TUBES, DAD, THERE WAS 06. WHICH IS THE REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT. REGULATIONS TO REVISE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR HOME BASED BUSINESSES PURSUANT TO THE NEW FLORIDA LAW. THINK LIKE SOMEONE SECOND. WELL, SECOND.

BROKE ALL THE VOTES. BOARD MEMBER BANKS. YEP. REMEMBER PRESSLER. YES I REMEMBER. SIR HAYEK IS RECUSED BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS? YES. VICE CHAIR. MILEY YES. CHAIR. PALMER. YES. OKAY.

[8.  

Application No. LDR-22-004 - A Request to Amend the Indiantown Land Development Regulations to Supplement Existing Tree Mitigation Requirements and Establish a Tree Mitigation Fund.

]

THANK YOU. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO ITEM EIGHT. APPLICATION NUMBER L D R DASH 22 004 OUR REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION TO SUPPLEMENT EXISTING TREATMENT EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS. AND ESTABLISH A TREAT MITIGATION FUND. GOOD EVENING STAB IS REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD. CONTINUE TO CITE HIM TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF APRIL 7TH 2022 OKAY? FORMER MEMBERS. WE WOULD ASK FOR EMOTION TO THAT. WE NEED A MOST IMPORTANT MEMBERS. I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. APPLICATION NUMBER LD. R 22 DEATHS 004 AND SO OUR NEXT SCHEDULE. BOARD MEETING ON APRIL SEVEN. OKAY? SECOND OKAY.

OKAY. OKAY THANK YOU. ROLL CALL . VOTE BOARD MEMBER BANKS? YES. REMEMBER PRESSLER? YES. BOARD MEMBER SUHAILA YES. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. YES. THANKS CHAIR. MILEY YES, CHAIR. PALMER? YES.

[9.  

Application No CPA-22-005 - A Request to Amend the Indiantown Comprehensive Plan to Include a Property Rights Element.

]

ITEM NINE. APPLICATION NUMBER C P A DASH 22 005 A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDIAN TOWN COMPREHENSION PLAN TO INCLUDE A PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT. DURING THE 2021 STATE LEGISLATIVE SESSION, HOUSE BILL 59 WAS ADOPTED AND CODIFIED AS CHAPTER 1 63. FLORIDA STATUTES AND THE NEW LAW REQUIRES EACH LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO ADOPT A PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT INTO ITS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS NEW ELEMENT MUST BE ADOPTED BY THE DATE OF THE NEXT SCHEDULED EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT , WHICH YOU'LL LEARN ABOUT, UH, AS YOU GROW IN THIS BOARD. MORE EARLIER, SO THAT MEANS WE CANNOT AMEND OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AGAIN UNTIL WE ADOPT THIS ELEMENT. THERE'S THE SANCTION IS YOU CAN'T TOUCH YOUR PLANT UNTIL YOU HAVE A PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT. SO WE'RE ADOPTING THIS TODAY. I'M SORRY. WE'RE MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL.

UM FOR TRANSMITTAL TO CEO OF THIS NEW. PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT, WHICH HAS A GOAL, ONE OBJECTIVE AND ONE POLICY, WHICH IS PROVIDED FOR YOU AND YOUR BACKUP. AND PAGE. PAGE 82 OF YOUR PACKET AND PAGE TWO OF THE CORRESPONDING STAFF REPORT. THIS IS SOMETHING ESSENTIALLY THAT THE COUNCIL HAS ALREADY DOING IS JUST A MATTER OF PUTTING IT IN WRITING AND RECOGNIZING THAT, UM ANYONE THAT OWNS PROPERTY HAS PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THAT AND ITS DECISION MAKING, UH, TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. ANY EASEMENTS LEASES, ETCETERA. THE PROCESS FOR AMENDING THE LAND

[00:40:06]

DEVELOPMENT RECORD REGULATIONS. I'M SORRY THE PROCESS FOR AMENDING THE CONFIDENCE OF PLAN LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE YOUR MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL TONIGHT. AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THEY WILL TRANSMIT THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION TO THE STATE. VIDEO. FROM THERE WE DO AN EXPEDITED REVIEW, WHICH IS DONE BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ADJACENT TO US STATE GOVERNMENTS. AND THE STATE D E O. WE GET COMMENTS BACK. AND THEN WE SCHEDULE FOLLOW UP HEARING. FOR THE COUNCIL. SO IF YOU RECOMMEND TRANSMITTAL, AND THEN THEY ACTUALLY TRANSMITTED THERE WILL BE REVIEWED BY OTHER AGENCIES. AND ONCE THAT WAS DONE , WE HAVE I BELIEVE 90 DAYS TO GET IT ON THE AGENDA AGAIN. AND ADOPTED. UNLIKE YOUR L D R TEXT AMENDMENTS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN , AND THEN THAT BECOMES EFFECTIVE A NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER THE STATE HAS DEEMED THAT OUR PACKAGE IS COMPLETE. AFTER WE SEND. TO THEM THE PACKET AFTER SECOND READING A COUNCIL. YOU HAVEN'T BEEN THAT TO THAT. LEAVE ANYTHING OUT. SO EVERY LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN FLORIDA IF THEY HAVEN'T ALREADY ADOPTED THIS SINCE OCTOBER ONE IS DOING IT NOW. IN FACT, OUR REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY HAD TO PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENTS ON THEIR LAST AGENDA JUST A WEEK AGO. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I HAVE A QUESTION ON PAGE TWO, WHERE YOU HAVE THE NUMBER ONE AND IT TALKS ABOUT, UM OR IT SAYS THE RIGHT OF A PROPERTY OWNER TO PHYSICALLY POSSESS AND CONTROL HIS OR HER INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING EASEMENTS. I MEAN, I THOUGHT THAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF AN EASEMENT IS THAT IT'S SET ASIDE. AS AN EASEMENT FOR SOMETHING, SO I MEAN, I'M JUST THINKING, YOU KNOW, I KNOW I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE USE AN EASEMENT AS A DRIVEWAY OR DRIVE ON IT. HOW CAN YOU? UM IT JUST SEEMS LIKE YOU KNOW, THIS NUMBER ONE HERE WOULD SUPERSEDE THE PURPOSE OF THE EASEMENT THAT YOU HAD RELINQUISHED WHEN YOU BOUGHT THE PROPERTY. LET ME GO AHEAD AND TRY TO ADDRESS A LITTLE BIT. FIRST OFF. I'M NOT GONNA I'M NOT GONNA ARGUE WITH YOU ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT ALL THIS WORDING IS, IS THE MOST WISE WAY TO STATE. ALL THESE THINGS. THESE ARE ALL DIRECT EXACT QUOTES FROM THE STATE STATUTE. SO THAT FIRST OFF THAT THAT'S WHERE THIS COMES FROM, COMES STRAIGHT FROM THE STATE'S STATUTE, AND I WILL TELL YOU IT'S RIPPED THE EXACT WORDING FROM THE STATE STATUTE BECAUSE THERE HAVE BEEN SOME JURISDICTIONS AROUND THE STATE. THAT HAVE TRIED TO GET MORE CREATIVE AND DO A BUNCH OF OTHER STUFF TO COMPLY WITH THIS STATUTE AND VIDEO HAS BEEN KICKING HIM BACK LIKE CRAZY, SO THE EASY WAY TO DO IT IS SIMPLY TAKE THE EXACT STATE LANGUAGE FROM THE STATE STATUTE. NOW WITH REGARD TO YOUR PARTICULAR QUESTION IT IT ISN'T REFERENCING HERE. THE RIGHT OF THE PROPERTY, OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND PHYSICALLY AND PHYSICALLY POSSESS AND CONTROL HIS OR HER INTEREST IN THE IN THE PROPERTY , INCLUDING EASEMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THAT SENTENCE THERE, I WOULD TELL YOU THAT THAT IS REFERENCING THEIR RIGHT TO USE AN EASEMENT. THEY HAVE THAT THEY OWN. AS OPPOSED TO AN EASEMENT THEY'VE GIVEN ISN'T AN EASEMENT LIKE BETWEEN TWO LOTS. BUT. IT IT MEANS IT COULD BE. YEAH, IT COULD BE ALL MANNER OF THINGS AGAIN. THIS IS A VERY GENERAL STATEMENT, BUT IN THE CONTEXT HERE, I THINK THIS IS REFERRING TO WHAT WE CALL IN THE TECHNICAL LANGUAGE. THE HOLDER OF THE DOMINANT TENEMENT. THE PERSON WHO HOLDS THE EASEMENT WHO'S BEEN GIVEN AN EASEMENT. OKAY. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, JUST TAKE IT AND JUST REGULAR REAL ESTATE CONTEXT. YOU GOT TWO PARCELS. YOU GOTTA ROAD RIGHT HERE. GOT PARCEL GOT PARSED AND PERSONAL A HAS GIVEN AN EASEMENT TO PARCEL B TO GO OVER IT RIGHT. THAT EASEMENT. IS OWNED BY THIS PROPERTY. ALRIGHT THE FEE IT'S CALLED OF THIS PROPERTY IS OWNED BY THIS GUY, SO I THINK WHAT THIS IS REFERENCING IS THE RIGHT TO USE. THAT EASEMENT THAT THIS GUY OWNS. ALRIGHT SO AGAIN. YOU START TWISTING AND TURNING THESE WORDS 8000 WAYS YOU CAN FIND ALL SORTS OF WAYS THAT IT DOESN'T COMPLETELY COMPUTE, BUT IT COMES STRAIGHT OUT OF THE STATUE. GOODNESS. AND I WILL TELL YOU GENERALLY. THIS WAS ULTIMATELY PUT TOGETHER BY THE LEGISLATURE, THE FINAL PRODUCT THAT CAME OUT NONE OF THIS EFFECTUATE A SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE IN FLORIDA LAW, FLORIDA NONE OF THIS

[00:45:04]

EFFECTUATE WHAT A SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE A SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE IN FLORIDA LAW. THIS IS A. AFFAIR BUT VERY BRIEF STATEMENT OF SOME OF THE PROPERTY RIGHTS PROPERTY OWNERS ALREADY ENJOY. IN FLORIDA. IT'S JUST MAKING EVERYBODY WRITE IT DOWN IN THERE. COM PLAN. THANK YOU. MM HMM. PUBLIC COMMENTS. ONE OF NO, MADAM CHAIR. WE NEED A MOTION. SECOND, I MAKE A MOTION THAT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL TAKE ACTION TO TRANSMIT APPLICATION NUMBERS. C P A 22 005 TO FLORIDA D E T O AND REVIEWING AGENCIES. ELSE. SECOND OKAY. ROLL CALL VOTES. BOARD MEMBER BANKS. YES REMEMBER PRESSLER? YES. REMEMBER? SO HAYEK YES. REMEMBER WILLIAMS? YES MOISTURE. MILEY YES. PALMER? YES. OKAY FOR YOUR DIRECTOR'S REPORT. YOU WANT TO DO THAT ARE MOVED. UM GOOD. WITH. YET YOU DON'T WANT TO DO THAT. THIS REPORT? NO WE AS YOU ALL TO PROVE THE AGENDA BEFORE HE WAS MOVING THREE AND FOUR TO THE END OF THE REGULAR, THAT'S WHAT I WANT. OKAY SO WE GO. YEAH I

[3.  

PZAB Member Eligibility Requirements

 

]

WOULD SUGGEST ITEM THREE WOULD BE YOUR NEXT. OKAY. OKAY, UM SO I HAD, UM, THREE PC, A BOARD MEMBER ELIGIBILITY. REQUIREMENTS. OKAY? THE SUBJECT MATTER ABOUT BEFORE US ON ITEM THREE IS A SENSITIVE ONE. FOR SOME MEMBERS. HOWEVER I ASK THAT WE ALL AGREED TO REMAIN RESPECTFUL. CIVIL TO ONE ANOTHER. THROUGHOUT THIS DISCUSSION. THE DISCUSSION OF THE PC, A BOARD MEMBER ELIGIBILITY AND REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH A STRICTLY BUSINESS. AND OF COURSE OF ACTION TAKEN BY THIS BODY IS DONE SO IN OUR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS APPOINTED PUBLIC SERVANTS WITH A FOCUS ON PRESERVING THE BEST INTERESTS. OF THIS COMMUNITY. I WILL BE LOVED INDIAN TOWN. PLEASE ALSO REMEMBER THAT THE THAT EACH PIECE IS A BOARD MEMBER IS APPOINTED BY AND SERVES AT THE PLEASURE OF THE INDIAN TOWN VILLAGE COUNCIL, AND WE AND WE CARRY NO POWER AUTHORITY TO UNDO OR REVOKE APPOINTMENTS TO THIS BOARD. WE HAVE TWO TASKS AT HAND AS WE DISCUSS HIS ABILITY. NUMBER ONE. REQUESTED BY BOARD MEMBER PRESSLER. WE WILL DISCUSS THE ELIGIBILITY STATUS OF BOARD MEMBERS TO HIRE AT THE TIME OF HIS APPOINTMENT AND DETERMINE WHETHER THIS BOARD WILL RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL EVALUATE HIS ELIGIBILITY. NUMBER TWO. AS REQUESTED BY DIRECTOR JEFFERSON JEFFERSON. THIS BOARD WILL MAKE IT RECOMMENDATION TO STAFF ABOUT THE WORDING OF THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. IN OTHER WORDS. DO WE NEED IT? DO WE NEED A CHANGE YOUR LANGUAGE TO MAKE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS CLEAR. WE WILL DELIBERATE.

LIBERAL BERRY. I CAN'T. OKAY GIVE HIM A WORD WE WILL DELIBERATE ON ON THAT TWO TESTS USING THE VILLAGE L D R SECTION 11-58. QUOTE. MEMBERS MAY BE REMOVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL UPON WRITTEN CHART CHARGES AT PUBLIC HEARING. MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD SHALL SERVE WITHOUT COMPENSATION AND SHARE RESIDE WITHIN A MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR RESIDENCY. R B, THE OWNER OF A BUSINESS LOCATED FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR WITHIN THE VILLAGE. ONE OF MANY THINGS I LOVE GENERALLY GENUINELY LOVE ABOUT MY FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS IS THE DEEP ROOTED PASSION THAT EACH HALF FOR INDIAN TOWNS SUCCESS. REMAIN PASSIONATE. BEEP BUT PLEASE BE MINDFUL THAT THIS IS NOT A PERSONAL ATTACK ON ANY ONE OF US. UNLESS A MAJORITY OF YOU EJECT EVERY MEMBER WOULD HAVE UP TO THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. THE ORDER WILL FOLLOW THE EXACT ONE USED BY THE VILLAGE CLERK FOR ROLL CALL. MANNING CLERK. BOARD MEMBER BANKS. WITHOUT HAVING MUCH

[00:50:05]

BACKGROUND AND ONLY HAVING BEEN A MEMBER FOR WHAT? FOUR WEEKS, SIX WEEKS. I'M GOING TO PASS. IF I MAY. OKAY? BOARD MEMBER, PRESSLER. UM. I WANTED TO MAKE A MOTION. IS THIS THE PROPER PLACE OR THE RIGHT TIME TO DO THAT? I'M A LITTLE MURKY OF WHERE WE ARE EXACTLY JUST DISCUSSING. DR.

BUT I MEAN, NO, I'M NOT TESTS ANY DISCUSSION, ANY COMMENT? WHAT IS? ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS? THAT'S THE THAT'S THE QUESTION WHEN BEFORE WE CAN DO ANY VOTING OR ANYTHING WE NEED TO DISCUSS, UM THE SUBJECT AT HAND. IF THERE IS NO COMMENTS, THEN WE'LL MOVE FORWARD. IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A DRESS ON FEBRUARY 17TH? I EMAILED A MEMO OUTLINING INFORMATION THAT HAD COME TO LIGHT. THAT ONE OF OUR SEATS ON THE PC ABOARD DID NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AS ADDRESSED IN CHAPTER 11 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT RULES. I HOPE THAT I THINK THAT EVERYONE HAS RECEIVED A COPY. HAS EVERYONE RECEIVED A COPY OF THAT? MM HMM. UM. THE INFORMATION IS OUTLINED THERE WHAT THE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE AND WHAT CONSTITUTES WHETHER OR NOT YOU HAVE A BUSINESS WITHIN THE VILLAGE. SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ENTER THAT MEMO INTO THE RECORD AND PRESENT IT TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL FOR ACTION. I THINK YOU SHOULD GIVE EVERYBODY A CHANCE TO SPEAK PERMISSION OF THE CHAIR BEFORE YOU MAKE A MOTION. I WOULD THINK THAT THAT WOULD BE THE DEMOCRATIC THING TO DO HERE.

THANK YOU, MEMBER SUHAILA. HOW HAS MADE A MOTION IF THERE'S A SECOND, WE CAN STILL DISCUSS OKAY? OKAY, MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AS THE SECOND. I WAS SECOND. I STILL LIKE TO GIVE MY COMMENTS BEFORE EMOTION IS MADE. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT EVERYBODY HAD THE CHANCE TO MAKE A COMMENT HERE.

OKAY? OKAY? UM REMEMBER WILLIAMS, I WOULD HAVE TO SAY NO. I CAN'T GO ALONG WITH REMOVE HIM. BECAUSE OF ME BEING JUST PRESENT ON THE BOARD. FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. OKAY SO I'M GONNA PASS ON THIS. OKAY? OKAY, OKAY. WORK. CHEER CAN I CAN I RECOMMEND THAT THERE HAS BEEN A MOTION IN THE SECOND. UM, I THINK THERE MAY HAVE JUST BEEN A MISCOMMUNICATION ON ASKING IF THERE WERE ANY BOARD MEMBERS WITH ANY COMMENTS, BUT WITH THERE BEING A MOTION ON THE FLOOR AND RECOMMEND, MR SYKE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO I TOTALLY AGREE. I WAS, UM I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOUR SAYING ATTORNEY. THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING TO EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY, INCLUDING MEMBERS OF HIGH TO VOICE THEIR OPINION. OR REFRAIN. AS OUR TWO MEMBERS HAVE SO UM. WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE ON WITH THE UM YES. WHAT THE DISCUSSION. I MEAN, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I'M ALLOWED TO SPEAK. YOU ARE AMERICAN IS MADE HERE YOU ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK, OKAY? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. BOARD MEMBERS TO HAYEK HASN'T TEXTED YOU GO.

THANK YOU. I APOLOGIZE. I JUST WANTED TO COME ON ZOOM, SO THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF A DELAY HERE. UM I'D LIKE TO JUST COMMENT ON THIS. I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO COMMENT ON THIS BEFORE IT EVEN BECAME ON THE AGENDA. UM, AND LAST THE LAST MEETING AND I RESPECTED YOU KNOW THE VILLAGES, WHICH IS AND THE REST OF THE OF THE COUNCIL'S WISHES, SO I DO APPRECIATE YOU. BUT TO ME SPEAK NOW AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME. SO FIRST AND FOREMOST, I'D LIKE TO THANK UM. EVERYONE IT'S BEEN ONE OF THE GREATEST HONORS OF MY LIFE TO BE APPOINTED ON THIS PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD TO SERVE THE COUNCIL, THE FELLOW PLANNING AND ZONING MEMBERS, THE STAFF, THE COMMUNITY AND THE RESIDENTS OF INDIAN TOWN. UM I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DEAL WITH THIS ISSUE AT HAND IN A PUBLIC FORUM. UM I'D LIKE TO NOTE THAT MY SIDE OF THE STORY HAS NOT BEEN TOLD, AND THE ONLY SIDE HAS BEEN MISR ANITA PRESSLER. AND I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO SPEAK TO THIS MOMENT AND IT STILL SURPRISES ME THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION BEFORE I EVEN HAD THE CHANCE TO SPEAK. BUT NOW THAT I AM ABLE TO SPEAK, I APPRECIATE THAT OPPORTUNITY, AND I APPRECIATE THE BOARD. ALL OF YOU, INCLUDING MYSTERY, NINA PRESSLER TO HEAR MY SIDE OF THE STORY SO I WAS

[00:55:05]

APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING ZONING BOARD FOR A TERM. I BELIEVE THESE DATES ARE CORRECT. FROM 11 12 22 9 11 22 THE RULE AT THE TIME OF MY APPOINTMENT TO BE QUALIFIED AS A BUSINESS OWNER. WAS AS FOLLOWS. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD SHALL SERVE WITHOUT ANY COMPENSATION AND SHALL RESIDE WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR RESIDENCY OR BE OR BE THE OWNER OF A BUSINESS LOCATED.

PERMITTED HIM, UM OF ONE YEAR WITHIN THE VILLAGE. AT THE TIME OF MY APPOINTMENT, THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT. THAT WAS THE RULE AT THE TIME OF THE APPOINTMENT, SO I INFORMED THE VILLAGE AND THE STAFF THAT I HAVE BEEN AN OWNER OF THE BUSINESS OF A BUSINESS LOCATED WITHIN THE VILLAGE. SO THERE WAS NO REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT IN THE L D.

R AT THE TIME OF MY APPOINTMENT. SO I WEAR. THAT WAS THE RULE AT THE TIME OF MY APPOINTMENT. I JUST WANT THAT TO BE CLEAR. UM IF THERE WAS A BUSINESS TAX REQUIREMENT THAT WAS IN THE CODE AT THAT TIME. IT'S JUST A MATTER OF PAPERWORK TO FILE THAT AND I WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE THAN HAPPY TO ABIDE BY THAT REQUIREMENT. UM AND JUST TO SHARE WITH EVERYBODY . YOU KNOW, I DO WEAR A LOT OF DIFFERENT HATS ON THE VILLAGE. I THERE I AM A ATTORNEY. THERE'S SO HIGH A CLAW. I'M IN THE REAL ESTATE BUSINESS. THERE'S A HIGHER COMMERCIAL REALTY. UM. AND THE LAW FIRM HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE SINCE 2000 AND 14. THE SAHARA COMMERCIAL REALTY IS SINCE 2000 AND 15 UM. MEMBER YOU KNOW I AM I YES. YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES CHAIR. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO. LIKE WHAT I MUST FINISH. MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE THIS MATTERS. PERTAINING TO MR SO, HAYEK. I THINK DUE PROCESS WOULD REQUIRE YOU OKAY? MAKE HIS POINT. OKAY MEMBERS, I CONTINUE, PLEASE. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. I WILL TRY AND BE BRIEF. UM YOU KNOW, I AM DIVERTED BY OPERATE VIRTUALLY. I DO USE MY FATHER'S MEDICAL FACILITY FOR MALE THAT IS THE 1983 PJ BOULEVARD SUITE. 105 I AM NEVER IN THE OFFICE. I RECEIVED MY MAIL THERE. I SPEND ALL OF MY LIFE MY TIME, MY EMAILS REGARDING THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. I'M OFTEN AT DUNKIN DONUTS. I'M OFTEN AROUND TOWN. EVERYBODY'S MY TIME. MY FOCUS, UM, PHYSICALLY, YOU KNOW, THIS IS WITHIN THE TOWN. SO, UM I HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN, UH, THE DUNKIN DONUTS PLAZA AS AN ATTORNEY TO COMMERCIAL REALTY, WHICH IS SEPARATE FROM THE OUTWEIGH. AND SO HAYEK FAMILIES . UM I WAS INVOLVED AS AN ATTORNEY AND AS A BROKER AND THE TRACTOR SUPPLY DEAL. UM I WAS INVOLVED AS AN ATTORNEY AND A BROKER IN THE CASA. BE A DEAL. I AM INVOLVED IN THE PARKVIEW PROJECT. UM ALL AS AN ATTORNEY, AND AS YOU KNOW, IT'S A HIGHER COMMERCIAL REALTY. SO THOSE I KNOW THAT MR ANITA JUST MET ME ON THE BOARD ABOUT A YEAR AGO.

UM BUT I'VE BEEN DEALING WITH THE VILLAGE AND THOSE CAPACITIES SINCE MARTIN COUNTY HAD THE JURISDICTION OVER INDIAN TOWN PRIOR TO THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, WHICH WAS IN 2000 AND 17.

SO THAT GOES BACK TO ALMOST FOUR OR FIVE YEARS AGO. UM. NOT ONLY THAT I ALSO HAVE DIRECT OWNERSHIP AND PARKVIEW. UM THE LLC FOR THAT, WHICH IS, UH, ACTUALLY IS CLOSE BY THE BUILDING THAT YOU GUYS SIT IN RIGHT NOW. THAT LLC WAS FORMED MORE THAN ONE YEAR PRIOR TO MY APPOINTMENT. THE LAND. THERE WAS THE CLOSING WAS AFTER THE YEAR REQUIREMENT, BUT I THAT LLC WAS FORMED PRIOR TO A YEAR. UM I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT THE CLOSING DID NOT TAKE PLACE TILL ABOUT 11 MONTHS IN A FEW DAYS. BUT WHEN I LOOK BACK, THAT WAS THE ACTUAL TIMEFRAME THERE. I'D LIKE TO ALSO ADD THAT I CURRENTLY OWN A HOUSE IN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. UM SO, UM. YOU KNOW, I BELIEVE WITHOUT A DOUBT THAT I HAVE OPERATED A BUSINESS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. UM IF THERE HAD BEEN A REQUIREMENT AT THE TIME OF MY APPOINTMENT, I WOULD HAVE EASILY SATISFIED IT. AND MOVING FORWARD, YOU KNOW, ADDING THE REQUIREMENT OF THE BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT IS NOT A BAD THING. I THINK THAT THERE ARE THERE ARE MANY WAYS TO QUALIFY AS OPERATING A BUSINESS IN THE VILLAGE OF TOWN. CAN YOU BELIEVE PHYSICALLY LOCATED HERE? WHAT

[01:00:02]

HAPPENS IF YOU HAVE A VIRTUAL LOCATION? WHAT IF YOU HAVE A HOME OFFICE? UM WHAT IF WHAT IF YOUR OWNER OF LAND RIGHT AND YOU'RE PAYING REAL ESTATE TAXES ? MAYBE YOU HAVE AN ACTIVE DEVELOPMENT? UH APPLICATION IN THE VILLAGE. THESE ARE QUESTIONS THAT I THINK EVERYBODY YOU KNOW.

A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT IS NOT THE ONLY WAY TO SHOW THAT YOU HAVE PHYSICAL PRESENCE WITHIN THE VILLAGE. SO, UM. NO, I JUST AND I DO JUST WANT TO POINT OUT IN THE PREVIOUS MEETING, IT WAS SAID, YOU KNOW, HONEST. ANYWAY, I'M JUST GONNA KEEP TO THIS ISSUE AT HAND. SO FOR THE I'M HAPPY TO GO GET THE BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT A REQUIREMENT AT THE TIME OF MY APPOINTMENT. HAPPILY SUPPORT THAT ADDITION TO THE CODE, AND I DON'T THINK THAT THIS BOARD, UM AS THE ABILITY TO REMOVE ME OR SUGGEST MY REMOVAL AS I WAS APPOINTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. UM AND THAT'S ALL THAT I HAVE TO SAY REGARDING THE BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT. I DON'T THINK THAT I NEED TO COMMENT ABOUT THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. I'M HAPPY TO IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE ME TO BEAUTIFUL. THANK YOU MEMBERS. AH, YES. REMEMBER WILLIAMS. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK. YES SIR. BOARD MEMBER. WILLIAMS SAID THAT HE WISHES THE PAST AT THIS TIME. IS THAT CORRECT? STILL, SIR. I'M SORRY. YOU WISH TO PASS ON COMMENTS AT THIS TIME ? YES THANK YOU. AND VICE CHAIR. MILEY IS NEXT. HELLO AGAIN. SO UM, IN REGARDS TO THE TOPIC AT HAND, I WOULD FIRST LIKE TO START BY ASKING, UM BOARD MEMBERS TO HIRE. MANY ALLEGATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE IN REGARDS TO YOU HAVING NOT HAVING A BUSINESS LOCATED. ARE YOU ABLE TO BE DIRECT AND LET US KNOW WHAT BUSINESS UM, YOU HAVE THAT LOCATED IN THE VILLAGE AT THE TIME OF YOUR CONCEPTION? BECAUSE YOU YOU YOU MENTIONED MANY THINGS THAT YOU'RE INVOLVED IN, BUT YOU NEVER SPECIFICALLY SAID WHAT THE BUSINESS IS THAT WITHIN THE VILLAGE? SURE SO. HI THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTION. SO HIGH A COMMERCIAL REALTY IS ONE SO HIGH A CLAW IS TO WHICH BOTH OPERATE VIRTUALLY EVEN THOUGH THAT I DO RECEIVE MAIL AT A PHYSICAL AT A PHYSICAL ADDRESS, SO THAT'S HOW I'VE ALWAYS OPERATED AND NUMBER THREE, UM PARKVIEW APARTMENTS THAT LLC WAS FORMED. UM UM.

PRIOR TO A YEAR OF MY APPOINTMENT AND THE MISSION OF THAT COMPANY WAS TO PURCHASE A PIECE OF LAND, DEVELOP IT AND TO CREATE APARTMENTS. SO WE START. WE STARTED ON THAT PRIOR TO A YEAR WE CLOSED ON IT ABOUT 11 MONTHS AND 30 DAYS WITHIN SO THOSE THREE ENTITIES WORK FORMED. PRIOR TO, UM MY APPOINTMENT, SO I. IN ANY OF THOSE THREE COMPANIES. UM. YOU COULD. THEY COULD QUALIFY AND I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR. SO I A CRIME MERCIAL REALTY AND TO HAYEK LAW DO WORK FOR THE DUNKIN DONUTS PLAZA CASABLANCA. PARKVIEW TRACTOR SUPPLY INDIAN TOWN MEADOWS, SO I WEAR AN INDIVIDUAL HAT SEPARATE FROM THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY AND WORKING ALL THOSE PROJECTS. AND THAT'S TO ANSWER YOUR SPECIFIC QUESTION. HOW DID I QUALIFY? FOR OPERATING A BUSINESS. AND THOSE THREE WAYS. OKAY. THANK YOU. SO, UM WHEN THOSE BUSINESSES WHERE.

FORMULATED DID YOU HAVE TO A PLOT LIKE DID YOU APPLY TO WITH THE VILLAGE IN ORDER TO DO BUSINESS IN THE VILLAGE OR LIKE, HOW DID THAT COME ABOUT WHERE'S YOUR BUSINESS? IS IT BASED IN THE VILLAGE? SO I SO HIGH, A COMMERCIAL REALTY AND SO HIGH A CLAUSE OF VIRTUAL SO IT'S MANY OF THE MEETINGS ARE ON ZOOM AND VIA EMAIL. THERE'S NO I DON'T SEE CLIENTS OR CUSTOMERS OR SO GOODS. I'M I'M OPERATE VIRTUALLY AND THEN THE PARKVIEW APARTMENTS THAT WAS FORMED TO PURCHASE AN ACTUAL PIECE OF LAND. SO UM, YOU KNOW, OR THESE THESE BUSINESSES ARE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT THAN A HAIRDRESSER RIGHT OR A SANDWICH SHOP BECAUSE YOU WOULD HAVE A PHYSICAL LOCATION. YOU'RE GETTING CUSTOMERS COMING IN, AND YOU WOULD HAVE A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT THAT YOU WOULD PUT ON THE WALL. THAT'S SAYING THAT I'M SERVING CUSTOMERS AND, UM, SELLING MERCHANDISE IN A PHYSICAL LOCATION. OUR BUSINESS IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT. AND WHAT THE SIA CLOUDS HIGH COMMERCIAL

[01:05:04]

IN THE SENSE THAT THOSE TWO ARE VIRTUAL AND THEN PARKVIEW LLC. YOU KNOW, THAT'S A THAT'S AN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. YOU DON'T REALLY HAVE A PHYSICAL PLACE.

BUT YOU KNOW, GETTING A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT IS NOT A BAD THING. IF THAT'S AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE THANK YOU. THANK YOU, UM. UM THANK YOU, UM, MEMBERS OF HOW YOU FOR ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS. UM. MY QUESTIONS WOULD BE OUR COMMENTS WOULD BE ALONE. WE'RE BEING CONJUNCTION WITH MEMBER PRESSLER AS WELL AS VICE CHAIR MILDLY, SO I'M NOT GOING TO REGURGITATE ANYTHING THAT THEY'VE SAID THAT, UM THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS THAT I HAD TO THINK THAT I'M I'M I'M GRATEFUL AND THANKFUL THAT YOU ANSWERED THE QUESTIONS. UM. HONESTLY AND I THINK THAT YOU, UM WHEN WE HAD A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, YOU DID RECRUIT YOURSELF. I THINK ONLY ONE THING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION IS THAT ALL THE BUSINESSES THAT YOU'VE MENTIONED THAT YOU THAT YOU ARE THAT YOU ARE THAT YOUR OWNER OF A CO OWNER? ALL IN THE IN THE VILLAGE, RIGHT? AND THEN YOU'RE CONSTANTLY RECRUITING YOURSELF. SO I GUESS ONE QUESTION HOW DO YOU HOW DO YOU INTEND? HOW HOW WOULD YOU INTEND TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY? YOU KNOW OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP ON THE BOARD? YES WE CAN'T TASTE REMOVE YOU ARE MAKE YOU REMAIN. THAT'S OUT OF OUR HANDS. ALREADY, RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO SEND THIS BACK TO THE COUNCIL FOR THEM TO MAKE THAT DECISION. BUT IN IN ALL FAIRNESS AND OUR HONESTY. HOW DO YOU MAINTAIN INTEGRITY? I THINK THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION AND YOU KNOW IF A FAMILY MEMBER OF MINE OR OMAR AT WAY OWNS A PIECE OF LAND OR ANY BUSINESS IN THE VILLAGE. SEPARATE FROM MY OWNERSHIP. I HAVE A DUTY AND AN ETHICAL OBLIGATION TO RECUSE MYSELF VIA FAMILY STATUS OR A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP. SO. WE'RE GOOD. I HAVE DONE THAT. TWICE I DID THAT ON INDIAN TOWN MEADOWS AND I DID IT ON. ON CASA BIA AND , UM, AT THAT TIME, I DID NOT HAVE ANY DIRECT OWNERSHIP IN EITHER OF THOSE PROJECTS. SO. I VOLUNTEERED THAT INFORMATION AND I'M UNDER THE DUTY TO DO THAT, AND I DID DO THAT, AND I RECUSED MYSELF BOTH TIMES TODAY I RECUSED MYSELF. AGAIN WHEN I DON'T HAVE A DUTY TO WITH THE LIVE WORK UNITS BECAUSE IT GIVES THE APPEARANCE THAT I COULD HAVE A CONFLICT BECAUSE CASA BIANCA AND PART OF YOU HAVE LIVED WORK, SO I TRY MY BEST TO ALL. WHATEVER THE RULES ARE, I TRY TO GO ABOVE AND BEYOND, AND I WILL CONTINUE TO DO THAT, AND THAT'S A PROMISE THAT I WILL MAKE TO THIS BOARD THE COUNCIL AND THE VILLAGE IS ALWAYS TO DO THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU. SO MUCH.

MEMBERS ARE HIGH YET. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? YES, I HAVE MR KEVIN POWERS. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. I MEAN, IT WAS KEVIN POWERS IN A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER HERE IN TOWN AND PUSH UP THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HERE IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT. UM I WANTED TO HIT THIS THING. TWO DIFFERENT WAYS. NUMBER ONE. YOU KNOW, I FEEL IT IN THE ROOM AND DIDN'T TOWN ALWAYS COMES TOGETHER AS WHEN WE ALL COME FROM DIFFERENT DIFFERENT ASPECTS. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY INDIAN TOWN, UM HAS A WAY OF COMING TOGETHER AS ONE AND I THINK IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE, IT SEEMS THAT AT LARGE IN A GENERAL SENSE THERE'S BUSINESSES BEING SINGLED OUT AND THEN AN INDIVIDUAL, SO IF YOU'LL INDULGE ME, I'D LIKE TO GO BACK.

AND JUST WHEN I THINK ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE BUSINESSES AND THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE, THE FIRST THING THAT POPS TO MIND IS SOMETHING THAT WAS NEAR NEAR TO ME. AND THAT WAS THE VERY FIRST AMBULANCE BRAND NEW AMBULANCE THAT INDIAN TOWN EVER HAD. AND IT WAS A DONATION FROM FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT. AND IT WASN'T TO SERVICE THEIR CAMPUS OUT THERE. IT WAS THE SERVICE THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE. I'M FAMILIAR WITH IT BECAUSE MY MOM WAS ONE OF THE MANY VOLUNTEERS THAT DROVE IT AND SERVED AS AN EMERGENCY VOLUNTEERED TO HELP. UM THE COGEN PLANT WHEN THEY CAME TO TOWN. WHAT DO THEY DO? THEY ESTABLISHED THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION. WHAT ELSE CAN WE DO? AND HOW CAN WE HELP? THE YMCA. IT'S NOT JUST CALLED THE WILLIAMS A. IT'S CALLED THE

[01:10:03]

LOUIS DREYFUS Y M C A CAMPUS. THEY WERE THE JUICE PLANT AND WHAT CAN WE DO? AND HOW CAN WE ENGAGE IN THE COMMUNITY AND MAKE IT A BIGGER? BETTER PLACE? AND THEY DID, AND THAT WAS LOUIS DREYFUS IS BASED IN PARIS, FRANCE. SO THIS WAS THEIR LEADERSHIP IN INDIAN TOWN. THE EMPLOYEES AND THE MANAGERS MAY NOT HAVE LIVED HERE. IT DIDN'T MATTER. THEY WANTED WHAT'S BEST AND BETTER FOR INDIAN TOWN. NOW A LAYER BY LAYER THAT RELATIONSHIP PRIOR TO THE INDIAN TOWN BECOMING A VILLAGE. WE HAD THE NEIGHBORHOOD ADVISORY COMMITTEE, NBC AND I PULLED MY NOTES AS I WAS GRABBING, GRABBING SOME THOUGHTS FOR THIS EVENING. IN 2000 AND TWO IT HAD NINE MEMBERS. NINE MEMBERS ART MATTSON, UM SISTER TERESA. ENORMOUS WATERS WAS ON IT. I BELIEVE SHE WAS ON IT. THEN ONE OF THEM WAS A GUY NAMED BILL HANNA AND BILL HANNA. WHEN YOU IF YOU KNEW BILL HANNA, IF YOU DIDN'T THIS GUY WAS MR INDIAN TOWN. EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM WAS INDIAN TOWN, WHETHER IT WAS EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIPS, SPORTS ATHLETICS, YOU NAME IT. HE WAS MR INDIAN TOWN. BILL HANNA NEVER LIVED IN INDIAN TOWN ONE SINGLE DAY EVER IN HIS LIFE EVEN FURTHER, MR HANNA WAS THE OUTREACH PERSON FOR BOB POST, RIGHT AND MR POST. HAD EVERYTHING RIGHT. HE HAD THE BANK WHERE WE WOULD SAVE OUR MONEY, AND WE WOULD BORROW MONEY. HE HAD THE PHONE COMPANY OF THE WATER COMPANY, THE SEWER COMPANY. UM HE HAD THE GARBAGE COMPANY SO AND THEY WERE GOVERNED BY THE SUNSHINE, RIGHT ? AND SO IF ANYBODY WAS CONFLICTED IN ANY WAY YOU COULD THINK OF IT WAS BILL HANNA, BUT HE THEY GOVERN THEMSELVES WITH HONOR AND INTEGRITY AND PUBLIC FASHION. AND IT DIDN'T LEAD TO WHAT I FEEL IS A GOTCHA MOMENT.

AND I'VE ONLY GOT 21 SECONDS AND I WILL SAY THAT DANIEL SAN HIKE IS A STAND UP PERSON. HIS FAMILY ARE STAND UP PEOPLE. THEY CAME TO INDIAN TOWN AND INVESTED WHEN NOBODY WOULD AND THEY BROUGHT US COMMERCIAL ADDITIONS FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTS NEEDED THEIR BUSINESSES ARE ACTIVE AND INVOLVED. DANIEL'S A PERSON OF HONOR AND INTEGRITY, SO KEEP IT.

KEEP IT AT SEVEN. IF I HAD ANY ADVICE EXPANDED, INCLUDING NONPROFITS, THEIR STAKEHOLDERS THEY OWN ASSETS HERE IN INDIAN TOWN AND FINALLY, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE AND YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR POWELL. YES I WANTED TO SAY A FEW THINGS. UM. OF THE THINGS THAT MR ZAHARIA BROUGHT UP. I DIDN'T HEAR ANY ADDRESS OF ANY BUSINESS WITHIN THE VILLAGE WAS JUST WHAT THE RULE SAYS THE RULE WAS IN PLACE WHEN MR ZAR HAYEK WAS APPOINTED. UM IT JUST WAS NOT KNOWN THAT HE DIDN'T HAVE A BUSINESS WITHIN INDIAN TOWN. WHAT I DID HERE WAS A LONG LIST OF CONFLICTS. UM ONE OF THOSE THINGS, UH ARE THAT I DIDN'T KNOW THAT YOU WEREN'T ACTING AS AN ATTORNEY FOR TRACTOR SUPPLY. YOU DID NOT RECRUIT. RECUSE YOURSELF FROM THAT VOTE. I DIDN'T LIVE HERE. YOU MENTIONED THAT. UM. I'M GOING TO HAVE TO JUST STOP YOU RIGHT THERE. I DO APOLOGIZE, BUT THAT'S JUST NOT APPROPRIATE TO SAY THAT IN A PUBLIC FORUM. I DID RECUSE MYSELF WITH THE TRACTOR SUPPLY. YOU SAID THAT IN THE PREVIOUS MEETING AND THAT IS NOT A STATEMENT OF FACT, THAT IS A FALSE STATEMENT. I RECUSED MYSELF IN THE IN THE INDIAN TOWN MEADOWS AND THE TRACTOR SUPPLY. I RECUSED MYSELF FROM THE DIOCESE. THE REQUIREMENT WAS TO NOT SAY ANYTHING. I LEFT THE DIESS AND I CAME AND I SAT IN THE AUDIENCE, WHICH WAS AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT. OKAY SO YOU'VE SAID THAT TWICE. I DON'T MIND FOR YOU TO BRING UP THIS ISSUE. BUT YOU HAVE TO SAY STATEMENTS OF FACT, YOU CANNOT SAY STATEMENTS THAT ARE NOT FACTUAL. YOU LISTED THE THING AND I SAY THAT RESPECTFULLY TO THINGS THAT YOU RECUSED YOURSELF FROM AND YOU HAD JUST MENTIONED THAT YOU ACTED AS AN ATTORNEY FOR TRACTOR SUPPLY, AND I DON'T REMEMBER YOU RECUSING YOURSELF FROM THAT VOTE. UM IN THE DEAL WITH TRACTOR SUPPLY FROM THE SALE OF THE FOUR ACRES FROM FROM, I RECUSED MYSELF. OKAY UM, NUMBER PRESSLER. I'M SORRY, REMEMBERS A HIGH THOSE THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH THOSE BECAUSE WE CAN JUST PULL UP. WE HAVE THE, UH, THE OTHER MINUTES TO PULL UP. UM I APOLOGIZE TO YOU. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO STATE FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. THAT THAT THAT YOU COULD PLEASE STATE THAT I DID RECUSE MYSELF FOR THAT PROJECT THAT, UM, OUR. OUR CLERK. SHE WILL PULL THAT UP AND SHE CAN MAKE YOU KNOW, MAKE SURE THAT THAT STATEMENTS ARE ACCURATE. I UNDERSTAND. I APOLOGIZE. THAT UM, THAT YOU FEEL THAT WAY AND IF ANY ERRONEOUS STATEMENTS ARE MADE WE APOLOGIZE AS A BOARD TO YOU, OKAY, BUT WE ARE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD. UM WE'RE GOING TO RESPECT ONE ANOTHER. WE'RE NOT GOING TO BICKER ABOUT IT. UM WE'RE GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO SEND THIS BACK TO THE ER. WE

[01:15:04]

HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT, OKAY? UM INDULGE JUST ONE MOMENT MEMBERS OF HIGHER FOR THE PUBLIC COMMENT. PLEASE. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR DOUG CALDWELL. THE AMOUNT CHAIR DOUG CALDWELL FROM INDIAN TIME AND IT WOULD, UH, WHAT IS YOUR MOTION GOING TO BE? WE HAVEN'T MADE A CHANCE. OKAY DID MAKE MONEY WE DID DID IT MOTION. DI DIDN'T DIE. OKAY. IT ON. IT WASN'T VOTED WANT TO COMMENT ON THE MOTION TO ENTER SOMETHING INTO THE RECORDS INTO THE MINUTES? I'M GOING TO COMMENT ON ON ITEM NUMBER THREE. THE PIECES HERE. BOARD MEMBER ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW. OKAY, THAT ITEM RIGHT THERE. SO FAR, I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. ALL I'VE HEARD ABOUT IS MR SAKE, OKAY? I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT ELIGIBILITY. THE OTHER THING THAT WAS RED, WASN'T IT? IT WAS RED WAS RED, BUT I MEAN FROM THE BOARD HERE AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS, A COUNCIL ON ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS HAS NOT BEEN DISCUSSED AT ALL. WE'VE HAD JUST IN CONVERSATION BETWEEN TWO MORE TWO BOARD MEMBERS, WHICH I THINK IS INAPPROPRIATE, BUT THAT'S MY OWN THING. I WILL DO WHAT MR POWER SAID. I HAVE NOTHING BUT RESPECT FOR ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS, ESPECIALLY MR SACK. THAT BEING SAID, IF YOU'VE GOT REQUIREMENTS THAT YOU WANT COUNSEL TO FIX RECOMMEND HIM. MM HMM. THIS IS NOT A. NOT A SACRIFICIAL THEY REQUIREMENTS. WORDS WERE SPOKEN. THEY WON'T READ. WHAT WAS IT? WHAT WAS LAND DEVELOPMENT RULE CHAPTER 11, AND I BELIEVE YOU READ IT. UM CHAIR.

YEAH. WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO READ THIS? NO THAT'S FINE. I JUST WANT TO JUST SAY YOU'RE YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO SEND SOMETHING THE COUNCIL FOR REQUIREMENTS OF ELIGIBILITY RIGHT? THAT BEING SAID, THEN I'LL ADDRESS COUNCIL ON THAT. BUT I WANT TO JUST TELL THIS BOARD THE SAME THING THAT MR POWER SAID. WE HAVE A WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY IN THIS TOWN TO KEEP A QUALITY PERSON. ON THIS BOARD TO MAKE GOOD JUDGMENTS ON SOMETHING THAT HE'S KNOWS ABOUT YOU ALL THE SAME WAY YOU ALL MAKING DECISIONS THAT ARE BENEFICIAL TO THE COMMUNITY, OR I HOPE THEY ARE ANYWAY. AND I THINK YOU ARE BUT THERE AGAIN YOU RECOMMEND THE COUNCIL. NOT ONE ON ONE. I THINK IT WAS VERY INAPPROPRIATE FOR HERE. IF YOU DIDN'T WANT HIM ON HER, YOU CAN RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL AND THEIR CHOICE TO TAKE HIM OFF. WELL, WE DIDN'T PUT MEMBERS OF HEIGHT ON THE BOARD. ALL OF US WAS RECOMMENDED AND ACTS TO BE A PART OF THIS BOARD. OKAY SO, UM , WHAT WE'VE ALL SAID, BASED ON THE REQUIREMENTS IF A PERSON WITH THIS ME OR ANYONE THAT IS NOT THAT DON'T MEET THE BASIC REQUIREMENTS. THAT THE COUNCIL SET THEN THE BOARD HAS AN OPPORTUNITY AND THE OBLIGATION TO SEND THAT BACK TO THE COUNCIL AND SAY TO THEM THESE THIS IS WHAT YOU SAID. AND THIS IS WHAT'S HAPPENING. SO YOU CORRECTED. WE JUST MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. I UNDERSTAND THAT. I KNOW HOW THINGS ARE NOT HOW THINGS WORK AND AGAIN THE RECORD. WHAT'S THE RECOMMENDATIONS? YOU'RE GOING TO SEND BACK THE COUNCIL? I'M SORRY. WHAT IS THE RECOMMENDATION WE'VE GOT. WE'RE GOING TO GET TO THAT AS A AS A WHOLE. WE'RE GONNA WE'RE GONNA VOTE. HOW IT'S GONNA BE OKAY. YOU JUST HAVE A SEAT AND YOU'LL SEE WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.

THANK YOU. YOU WANT ME TO REPEAT MY MOTION? UM UNTIL WE REDO IT. DO THE MOTION. I HAVE A MOTION TO SET THE MEMO INTO THE RECORD AND TO SEND IT TO THE COUNCIL. IT WAS IT WAS, IT WAS SECONDED.

IT WAS SECOND. CORRECT OKAY, RED FOOTBALL. YES MADAM. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. WE REPEAT THE MOTION.

ABSOLUTELY IT WAS TO SEND THE MEMO INTO THE RECORD. AND TO PROVIDE IT TO THE COUNCIL. THE MEMO BEING THE ONE FROM HIS PRESSLER PRESS YES. THEN YOU GOT IT RIGHT? I DID, BUT I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE COUNCIL HAD ALSO RECEIVED IT. THEY HAVE RECEIVED IT. OKAY THAT DID THE BOARD RECEIVED. EVERYBODY SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED. DID YOU RECEIVE IT? MR WILLIAMS? THE LETTER OKAY? YES, YES. CHAIR. IF I CAN SAY SOMETHING REALLY QUICK. UM SO WHEN I SECOND THE MOTION, MY SECOND WAS NOT IN REGARDS TO HIS STANCE OR HOW I FEEL. HE IF HE SHOULD BE REMOVED OR NOT. MY MOTION WAS JUST TO SEND THIS INFORMATION THAT WE HAD RECEIVED TWO COUNCIL. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I WAS SECONDING, RIGHT? THAT'S THE MOTION. OKAY JUST MAKING SURE WHAT SHE SAID TO EVERYBODY WAS JUST MAKING SURE OKAY. OKAY? SO. SO THE MOTION IS SIMPLY TO FORWARD THIS INFORMATION.

[01:20:03]

CORRECT. BEEN ENTERED INTO THE RECORDS. OKAY? MEMBER ELIGIBILITY ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS THAT MOST THAT'S WHAT THE MOTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABOUT. AND WE SHOULD HAVE SAID.

YES AND WHEN THE ONCE THEY WROTE , GO AHEAD. YOU YES. OKAY, GO AHEAD, MADAM CHAIR. SO. AS YOU LAID OUT THE BEGINNING AND AS IS LAID OUT IN THE AGENDA ITEM. WE'RE TWO RELATED ISSUES GOING ON IN THIS AGENDA ITEM. ONE IS PARTICULAR. IT RELATES TO THE MATTER YOU'VE BEEN DISCUSSING CONCERNING THOUGHTS AND INFORMATION THAT HAVE BEEN OFFERED TO YOU BY BOTH THIS PRESSLER AND MR SO HAYEK ABOUT HIS ELDER BUILDING. ALL RIGHT, SO ONE ISSUE IS SPECIFIC TO HIM.

AND THEIR NUMBER OF MOTIONS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN MADE WITH REGARD TO THAT ITEM. THE MOTIONS THAT THAT'S BEEN MADE IS UM. I WOULD SUGGEST YOU PRETTY MILD. I DON'T KNOW THAT, UH, IT'S BEEN SUGGESTED, UH, FROM PUBLIC JUST NOW THAT. TRANSMITTAL OF THAT MEMO. NECESSARILY MAJOR. YOU'RE MAKING A RECOMMENDATION THAT THEY DO A PARTICULAR THING. UM I DIDN'T HEAR THAT PRECISELY IN THE MOTION. BUT FOLKS COULD TAKE THINGS DIFFERENT WAYS. EXACTLY THAT YET AND KEEP AND KEEP THAT IN MIND IT WAS IT WASN'T IN. IT WASN'T IN THE EXACT WORDING IN THE MOTION, BUT FOLKS CAN TAKE THINGS ALL MANNER OF DIFFERENT WAYS. AS YOU HAVE HEARD. THE VILLAGE COUNCIL HAS, IN FACT.

RECEIVED COPIES OF THAT MEMBER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL DOES IN FACT HAVE A QUESTION BEFORE YOU IS WHETHER OR NOT YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE A FORMAL ACTION TO TRANSMIT IT TO THEM SUCH THAT YOU'RE SAYING WE HAD A VOTE ON THIS? AND WE'RE SENDING IT TO YOU. FOLKS MAY TAKE THAT TO MEAN SOMETHING. JUST KEEP THAT IN MIND, THE OTHER MATTER THAT'S BEFORE YOU ON THIS AGENDA ITEM.

AH IS MORE GENERALLY RELATED TO SOME OF THE OTHER DISCUSSIONS YOU'VE HAD. AND WHAT EVERYONE HAS DISCUSSED THE FACT THAT THE LANGUAGE WITHIN THE L D. R S RIGHT NOW ABOUT QUALIFICATIONS.

COULD USE SOME TUNING UP COULD USE SOME ADDING SOME SPECIFICATION. SO I WOULD SUGGEST YOU THAT WOULD BE AN ITEM YOU TAKE UP. AFTER YOU MAKE A DECISION WITH REGARD TO THIS FIRST ITEM THAT'S BEFORE YOU OKAY, JUST LET ME JUST EXCUSE ME. ONE MINUTE. UM, REMEMBER CHAIR UM, REMEMBER, PERSONALLY, UM, JUST FOR CLARITY. ITEM THREE. HE'S A BOARD MEMBER ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT. THAT'S WHAT WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT, RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT. THAT'S WHAT THE DISCUSSION WAS ABOUT. SO NOW WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING A VOTE. TO DETERMINE. DO WE SEND THIS TO THE COUNCIL? FOR THEM TO SCREEN LAND THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. IN MY CAREER, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WHAT YOU WOULD DO NEXT, OKAY? BECAUSE YOU HAVE YOU HAVE A YOU HAVE A MOTION. THAT YOU HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR THAT WAS DIRECTED TO A PIECE OF AND THIS CAN GET CONFUSING. SOMETIMES I UNDERSTAND THIS AS I AS I MENTIONED BEFORE THIS ITEM HAS EFFECTIVELY TWO PARTS. SOMETHING DIRECTED TO THE PARTICULAR AND SOMETHING DIRECTED SECOND TO SOMETHING MORE, JIM. I'D SUGGEST AFTER THIS. MOTION AND PORTION OF THIS ITEM IS DISPOSED OF ONE WAY OR ANOTHER APPROVED OR IT'S NOT APPROVED. YOU WOULD GO ON TO THEN HAVE A DISCUSSION MORE GENERALLY TO WHAT SORT OF TUNE UPS TO THE, UH TO THE REQUIREMENTS. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND GENERALLY GOING FORWARD? THE PEACE RIGHT NOW. IS TO HAVE THE LETTER TASK ONE LAST ONE. SENT TO COUNCIL. IT, UM. YES AS A BOARD. YOU'RE DECIDING TO SEND. THE BACKUP FOR THIS ITEM TO THE COUNCIL. OKAY AS A BOARD THE BOARD, OKAY. THEY DO ALREADY HAVE IT DECIDED TONIGHT. IF YOU WANT TO SEND IT. TO THE COUNCIL. AS A BOARD. AND SUGGESTS THAT THEY EVALUATE OKAY , SO THAT WAS WHEN YOU MADE THAT MOTION. THAT'S WHAT THAT WAS THIS ABOUT, RIGHT? WHAT SHE SAID. OKAY AND VICE CHAIR. THAT'S WHAT YOU WERE TAUGHT THIS YOU'RE CLEAR ON THAT. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT AS WELL, RIGHT? WELL LET ME JUST GET VERIFICATION TO MAKE SURE THAT I'M ON THE RIGHT PAGE. SO, UM, WITH US, SENDING THIS DOCUMENTATION IF WE ALL COME TO THAT AGREEMENT WITH US AND IN THIS INFORMATION TO THE BOARD.

[01:25:04]

DOES. IS THAT MAKING A DECISION THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING THEM TO REMOVE? MR SAHA. THAT'S NOT THAT'S SOMETHING SEPARATE. I'M I'M I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU SOME. I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU ALL SOME ADVICE HERE, OKAY? AS HEALTHY AS SAID THAT THAT IS NOT THE PRECISE WORDING THE MOTION, BUT I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS. NO NO, NO, NO, BUT I WANT TO BE REALLY CLEAR, PARTICULARLY BECAUSE UM ALL OF YOU ARE RELATIVELY NEW. AT THIS, OKAY? UM. AND AGAIN. THIS IS THIS IS NOT TRYING TO PUT FINGER ON THE SCALES ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. I JUST DON'T WANT ANY OF YOU TO MAKE A DECISION THAT THAT MAY HAVE IMPLICATIONS THAT HE HADN'T THOUGHT THROUGH. IT VERY WELL COULD BE UNDERSTOOD EITHER BY THE COUNCIL OR THE PUBLIC THAT THAT IS. WHAT IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE ACTION YOU TAKE OKAY? I. I THINK IT IS AN ACCURATE STATEMENT TO SAY THAT IT COULD BE EITHER INTERPRETED OR CONSTRUED BY THOSE IN THE PUBLIC OR OTHERWISE THAT THAT IS WHAT GOES ALONG WITH THAT ACTION. OKAY, SO YOU YOU SAID YES. SHE DIDN'T VOTE OR NO, WE HAVE NOT HAD A ROLL CALL VOTE YET ON THIS ITEM, OKAY. READY FOR THIS? AND ACTUALLY, UH, MADAM CHAIR. I'VE WANTED TO ADDRESS SOME PROCEDURAL. THINGS HERE REAL QUICK. DAN AND YOU AND I HADN'T HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPECIFICALLY DISCUSS THIS, BUT, UM, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT BECAUSE THIS MOTION THAT DIRECTLY RELATES. DIRECTLY RELATES TO YOU. I'D RECOMMEND THAT YOU RECUSE YOURSELF ON THE VOTE. IT WOULD IN MY INTERPRETATION OF OUR CODE, NOT COUNT AS ONE OF HIS AH CONFLICT RECUSALS BECAUSE IF YOU'LL RECALL THE CODE HAS A SPECIFIC LIMITATION. HOW MANY TIMES YOU CAN RECUSE YOURSELF ON ITEMS BEFORE YOU RUN INTO SOME TROUBLE . THAT CONFLICT, RECUSAL IS DIRECTED SPECIFICALLY TO APPLICATIONS. BY THE WORDING OF THE CODE. AND AS YOU ALL MAY RECALL ITEMS THAT COME BEFORE YOU WITH REGARD TO PARTICULAR PROJECT OR CHANGE IN LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE SO ON ARE STYLED IN THE FORM OF APPLICATIONS. THAT IS NOT THIS ACTION. AT ALL. IT IS NOT IN PURSUANCE OF ANY APPLICATION FORM. AND SO I WOULD MY ADVICE WOULD BE WOULD NOT COUNT AS ONE OF YOUR CONFLICTS, BUT NEVERTHELESS, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU RECUSE YOURSELF ON THIS VOTE. AND AGAIN JUST SO YOU ALL KNOW THE VOTING REQUIREMENT IS A MAJORITY OF THAT TO PASS SOMETHING AS A MAJORITY OF THOSE PRESENT AND VOTING. THOSE PRESIDENT VOTING IF MR HIKE DOES NOT VOTE ON THIS ONE, THE FIVE OF YOU SO WOULD REQUIRE AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF THREE OF YOU TO PASS THE MOTION. IT'S ONE. EVERYBODY KNOW THE RULES BEFOREHAND INSTEAD OF FIGURING OUT AFTER VOTES. BOARD MEMBER BANKS. I DISAGREE. REMEMBER PRESSLER. YES. BOARD MEMBERS TO HAYEK IS RECUSED. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS DISAGREE. PLACE CHAIR, MILEY. AFTER CLARIFICATION OF THE MOTION. I'M GOING TO SAY NO. CHAIR, PALMER. NO. PROBLEM. SO CHAIR. TO THE DISCUSSION WE'VE HAD BEFORE I SUGGEST YOU THAT THE SECOND TOPIC RELATED TO THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU ALL IS DISCUSSION OF ANY CLARIFICATION. YOU ALL MIGHT RECOMMEND RECOMMEND INITIALLY TO STAFF TO PREPARE A DRAFT ORDINANCE TO BRING BACK BEFORE YOU WITH REGARD TO THE QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. OKAY. I'M SORRY. SAY THAT AGAIN. FOR AFTER THE FIRST ITEM FOR. BUT NO, WE'RE IN. YOU KNOW IT'S GOING TO BLEED INTO ITEM FOR A LITTLE BIT, BUT I DON'T WANT TO FURTHER CONFUSE THE ISSUE BECAUSE YOU DO HAVE SOME OTHER RELATED ITEMS IN IT.

[01:30:07]

WHAT I WOULD SPECIFICALLY RECOMMEND DISCUSSING, AND PERHAPS IF. WE'VE BEATEN THIS UP ENOUGH FOR TONIGHT. MAYBE DO IT A DIFFERENT TIME. BUT IF IT'S PRESIDENT OR HEADS, YOU MIGHT WANT TO DISCUSS IT NOW. WE'VE DISCUSSED THE LANGUAGE AS IT CURRENTLY IS IN THE L. D. R S ABOUT THE QUALIFICATIONS. WHAT RECOMMENDATIONS WOULD YOU HAVE TO ADD ADDITIONAL CLARIFYING LANGUAGE TO MAKE IT MORE CLEAR, SO WE DON'T RUN INTO ANY SORT OF CONFUSION IN THE FUTURE. AS TO WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE MEETS QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. AND AGAIN. TO THAT POINT. TO HAVE IT. IT'S AN. IT'S IN YOUR STAFF REPORT FOR ITEMS FOR THAT EXACT LANGUAGE. BUT LET ME READ TO YOU. WE'LL TACKLE THIS IN TWO PARTS. SO FIRST ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS STATES. SHALL RESIDE WITH THE MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR RESIDENCY. IS THAT LANGUAGE ? CLEAR ENOUGH. OR DO YOU RECOMMEND CHANGES TO THAT LANGUAGE TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD? A MEMBER SHALL RESIDE. WHAT THEY MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR RESIDENCY WITHIN THE VILLAGE. I MEAN, YOU JUST HAD SOMEONE CLAIMED THAT THEY ARE OPERATING A BUSINESS BY VIRTUAL AH, SO I MEAN, DO YOU HAVE TO CLARIFY THAT THE RESIDENCE IS A PHYSICAL LOCATION WITH A PHYSICAL ADDRESS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE. YOU CAN'T ZOOM IN TO THE VILLAGE AND CLAIM RESIDENCY. YOU CAN'T JUST THAT YOU OWN A HOUSE, BUT YOU DON'T LIVE THERE OR YOU HAVE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY OR YOU ANY THAT IS NOT, UM, DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESIDENCY, PHYSICAL RESIDENCY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE. I THINK IT'S PRETTY CLEAR WITH THE MINIMUM YEARS FOR RESIDENCY.

THAT PART IS PARTICULARLY CLEAR . IN MY OPINION, IT'S THE SECOND PART THAT I HAVE ISSUE WITH. DID IT. WOULD THAT BE CURRENT? YEAH I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE BECAUSE THERE'S TWO PARTS TO IT SO RIGHT TO MAKE SURE THAT PART WAS OKAY. IT'S CLEAR MOST OF YOU FEEL THAT WAY. YES. SECOND PART STATES. SHALL BE THE OWNER OF A BUSINESS LOCATED FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR WITHIN THE VILLAGE.

DOES THAT LANGUAGE NEED CLARIFICATION? YES, MADAM JARED. AGAIN APPARENTLY NOT. YOU CAN VIRTUALLY HAVE A BUSINESS WITHIN THE VILLAGE. IT NEEDS TO BE COMPLETELY CLEAR THAT YOU NEED TO HAVE AN ADDRESS. A PHYSICAL ADDRESS. YOU NEED TO HAVE A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT HANGING ON THE WALL, A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. YOU NEED TO RECEIVE YOUR MAIL THERE.

JUST TO HELP BUILD FACILITATE THIS DISCUSSION. ARE THERE ANY OTHER THOUGHTS ON CLARIFICATION . WELL I DON'T HAVE ANY. UM THIS IS THIS IS A GOING FORWARD, RIGHT? YES AND I THINK, UM, MEMBER PRESLEY BRING UP SOME VERY VALID POINTS. UM IF YOU'RE GOING TO IF YOU LIVE IN THERE, YOU NEED TO BE PHYSICALLY LIVING THERE. NOT JUST BOUGHT A PROPERTY AND YOU'RE NOT THERE, ARE YOU? YOU KNOW YOU NEED TO BE PHYSICALLY LIVING THERE. CHAIR MEMBERS OF HOW I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE MATTER. GO AHEAD, JUST LIKE TO. I JUST LIKE TO SAY ON THE OWNING A BUSINESS COMPONENT. I THINK THAT THE RECOMMENDATION TO ADD ONE WAY OF HAVING PRESENCE IN THE VILLAGE WITH A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT. IS A WONDERFUL ADDITION. BUT THEY'RE DIFFERENT BUSINESSES PAY DIFFERENT TAXES, SO A BARBER DOES NOT PAY REAL ESTATE TAXES. BARBER OPERATES A BUSINESS DOESN'T PAY REAL ESTATE TAXES AND OWNER OF A SHOPPING CENTER OR AN OWNER OF A OF REAL ESTATE IS PAYING THE REAL ESTATE TAXES. THAT THE BARBERS LOCATED IN SO THE REAL ESTATE OWNER. AS A THE

[01:35:02]

BARBER DOESN'T PAY REAL ESTATE TAXES AND THE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT INDUSTRY. SO IF YOU'RE GONNA INCLUDE CLARIFICATION. CLARIFICATION OF THE BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT. I WOULD ALSO SUGGEST THAT YOU CAN SATISFY THAT PRESENCE. IF YOU PAY SOME SORT OF TAX TO THE COUNTY, INCLUDING REAL ESTATE TAXES. THANK YOU MEMBERS SO HIGH, UM NO THANKS FOR HAVING ME SPEAK. YES, SIR. UM THE THAT IS STATE LAW. THERE ARE TWO STATUTES THAT ARE MENTIONED IN THE BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT, AND IT IS ALSO COUNTY LAW AND ORDINANCE. RATHER 4 64.

I BELIEVE IF I'M QUOTING CORRECTLY THAT SAYS YOU HAVE TO HAVE YOU CANNOT OPERATE A BUSINESS WITH IN MARTIN COUNTY. UNLESS YOU HAVE THAT. SO IF YOU'VE BEEN OPERATING A BUSINESS WITH IN MARTIN COUNTY WITHOUT THAT, I THINK THERE'S SOME ACCRUED FINES. UM I'D LIKE TO ADD SOMETHING THAT WOULD, UM. RESOLVE A LOT OF PROBLEMS THAT WE HAVE WITH TRANSPARENCY.

BEFORE WE VOTE ON THIS. I'D LIKE TO TAKE JUST A MINUTE AND REVIEW OR LOOK BACK AT INDIAN TOWN HISTORY. INDIAN TOWN HAS SPENT OVER 60 YEARS BEING GOVERNED BY SOMEONE WHO DID NOT LIVE HERE.

SOMEONE WHO INHERITED THE UTILITIES. THE LAND THE BANK, THE WATER, THE WASTE MANAGEMENT, YOU NAME IT. AND IT WAS INHERITED FROM FATHER TO SON. RESIDENTS HAD NO SAY. THERE WAS NO HOME RULE. RESIDENTS AND INDIAN TOWN VOTED TO INCORPORATE SO THEY COULD HAVE A SAY SO THEY COULD HAVE HOME RULE. SO RESIDENTS COULD DECIDE. THE DECISION BEFORE US ON MEMBERSHIP ON THIS BOARD. WOULD AS IT IS WRITTEN, ALLOW NON RESIDENTS TO SIT ON THIS SPORT. AND I SAY NO.

BECAUSE WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF SOMEONE WHO LIVES IN SEWELL'S POINT. AH IF YOU LEAVE IT THE WAY IT IS. SOMEONE WHO LIVES IN SEWELL'S POINT COULD HAVE A VOTE ON THIS BOARD. UM. I THINK THAT I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT THE MEMBERSHIP ON THIS BOARD THE LIMITED TO RESIDENTS ONLY. OKAY? WE'RE NOT MAKING THE MOTION RIGHT NOW. OKAY? WERE PAID WHERE SHE'S WRITING EVERYTHING DOWN THAT YOU SAID, AND WE GOT RIGHT. YOU LET ME KNOW WHEN THAT'S APPROPRIATE. YES, MA'AM. UM DIRECTOR. YEAH, ACTUALLY. YEAH, I WAS I WAS JUST GOING TO MENTION THE. CHANGING AROUND THE COMPOSITION. OF THE BOARD. AS OPPOSED. TO ENHANCING OR MODIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE EXISTING COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD. THAT ITEM. THE MOTION. I THINK YOU'RE ABOUT TO MAKE WOULD BE. WOULD BE IN ORDER UNDER ITEM FOR WHICH WE'RE ABOUT TO GET TO THAT GETS TO OTHER ITEMS RELATING TO HOW THE BOARD IS CONSTITUTED. AREN'T WE ON ITEM FOR WE'RE STILL ON ITEM THREE.

WE'RE STILL WE'RE STILL TALKING ABOUT. OKAY I THOUGHT WE HAD MOVED BEFORE WE HAD TWO TESTS FOR ITEM THREE. THIS IS THE SECOND TASK SOUTH, SPECIFICALLY LOOKING AT THE LANGUAGE THAT BOARD MEMBER. SHALL BE THE OWNER OF A BUSINESS LOCATED FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR WITHIN THE VILLAGE. I HEAR. CHOOSE SEPARATE THOUGHTS. ONE IS. DELETING. THE LANGUAGE THAT I'VE JUST READ TO YOU AND LEAVING. THE MEMBERSHIP AT SHALL RESIDE. HIS SIDE WITH A MINIMUM OF. ONE YEAR RESIDENCY.

DID YOU HAVE PHYSICALLY RESIDE? I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW HOW ELSE WE CAN. WE'RE SEARCHING FOR WAYS TO MAKE THAT CLEAR THAT IT NEEDS TO BE A PHYSICAL THAT YOU ARE PHYSICALLY RESIDE. RECEIVE YOUR MAIL, ACTUALLY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE. HERE'S WHAT I SUGGEST WE CAN OFFER A DEFINITION FOR VILLAGE RESIDENT IN CHAPTER TWO, AND SO WHEN WE USE THAT PHRASE OR VILLAGE BUSINESS OWNER. WE CAN DEFINE BOTH IN CHAPTER TWO, AND WHEN WE USE THAT PHRASE, WE'LL MAKE SURE YOU GUYS AGREE ON THE DEFINITION. THAT IS WHAT WE'LL BE REFERRING TO. WE CAN COME BACK TOON. WHAT ABOUT? UM, I MEAN, YOU KNOW YOU HAVE YOU MAY EVEN HAVE

[01:40:05]

SEASONAL RESIDENTS WHO LIVE PART TIME IN MICHIGAN OR HERE. BUT THEY CAN ONLY VOTE IN ONE PLACE.

WHAT ABOUT IF YOU ADD A REQUIREMENT LIKE THAT, TO EVEN MAKE IT MORE CLEAR? THAT YOU ARE A RESIDENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE. AND IT IS THE PLACE WHERE YOU PHYSICALLY RESIDE AND WHERE YOU VOTE. IF I MAY I HAVE MY HAND RAISED IF I MAY SPEAK NO, GO AHEAD. GO AHEAD MEMBERS TO THE HIGH. THANK YOU. UM I JUST WANTED TO JUST SHED SOME LIGHT IN HERE. YOU KNOW THE COUNCILS MADE UP OF RESIDENTS. THE PLANNING AND ZONING HAS FIVE SEATS. THAT OUR RESIDENTS AND THE BUSINESS THE TWO BUSINESS SEATS ARE PEOPLE THAT. ARE A PART OF THE COMMUNITY. SO INSTEAD OF TRYING TO SILENCE A PORTION OF THE COMMUNITY, THIS BOARD SHOULD ALWAYS ALLOW FOR EVERYBODY THAT HAS A VOICE IN THIS COMMUNITY TO HAVE A VOICE. SO IF YOU'RE A BUSINESS PERSON, IF YOU'RE A NON FOR PROFIT IF YOU'RE A LIBRARIAN, BY ALL MEANS, SPEAK AND BE ABLE TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD. THERE SHOULDN'T BE. WE SHOULDN'T BE SPENDING OUR TIME TRYING TO PREVENT PEOPLE FROM BEING ON THIS BOARD. IF THERE ARE PART OF THIS COMMUNITY THAT'S JUST MY TWO CENTS. THANK YOU MEMORY SO HIGH, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT SHE WAS SAYING. SHE WOULD.

I WOULD I IF I'M CORRECT ME FROM WRONG. WHAT SHE'S SAYING IS THAT THAT PERSON NEEDS TO LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY AND HAVE A PHYSICAL BUSINESS ADDRESS AND DOING BUSINESS THERE AS WELL AS LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY. AM I CORRECT? YES OKAY. ALRIGHT ANYONE COULD DEFINE THEMSELVES AS BEING A PART OF THE COMMUNITY. THAT'S TOO VAGUE. WE NEED TO BE ABSOLUTELY IRONCLAD, CLEAR THAT YOU ARE PHYSICALLY HAVING ADD BREASTS AND YOU LIVE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE. OKAY, THANK YOU, MEMBER PRESLEY. DIRECTOR JEFFERSON POLICE PROCEED. BEYOND THAT. THERE WERE SOME SUGGESTIONS THAT. THE BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT BE ADDED T, MAILING ADDRESS AND THE LIGHT.

MY RECOMMENDATION AGAIN IS TO PROVIDE A DEFINITION OF. THE VILLAGE BUSINESS AND A VILLAGE RESIDENT IN THE CODE AND DO NOT ADD ALL OF THAT LANGUAGE, TOO. WE ALL OF ELIGIBILITY. I MEAN, WE ALL ABIDE UNDER MARTIN COUNTY ORDINANCE THAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE HAVE THIS WITHOUT IT. YOU CANNOT OPERATE A BUSINESS IN MARTIN COUNTY. SO I DON'T UNDERSTAND. WHY UM, LIKE THIS IS SOMETHING NEW STATE LAW IT TO STATE STATUTE. THERE'S TWO OF THEM MENTIONED, UM AND THEY REFERENCED THIS. OKAY SO I DON'T SEE HOW YOU CAN CLAIM YOU HAVE A BUSINESS IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY, STATING A AND FOR US A PHYSICAL ADDRESS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE VILLAGE. OKAY, SO NOTED. IS THERE. IN HEARING THIS DISCUSSION. IS THERE ANY FURTHER APPETITE FROM OTHER BOARD MEMBERS FOR STAFF TO PUT TOGETHER SOME LANGUAGE ALONG THE FROM DRAFTING PERSPECTIVE? I AGREE WITH OUT THERE THAT WE HAD TO ADD THIS IN SOME DEFINITIONS RATHER THAN COMING UP THAT SENTENCE AS IT IS GETTING INTO THE PARTICULARS OF IT. IS THERE ANY APPETITE FROM OTHER BOARD MEMBERS TO SEE SOME LANGUAGE THAT WOULD IMPLEMENT A REQUIREMENT THAT, UH, TO QUALIFY AS A BUSINESS OWNER FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS? THAT THEY HAVE A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT. FOR A PHYSICAL ADDRESS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. AGAIN YOU'RE NOT APPROVING THAT AT THAT POINT WHERE MANY STEPS FROM THAT BOOK. BUT IS THERE AN APPETITE TO HAVE LANGUAGE BROUGHT BACK TO YOU TO THAT SAYS THAT TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT. I WOULD SAY YES GOING BACK TO WHEN THE OTHER L D R THAT WE VOTED ON . WHEN I HAD A QUESTION IN REGARDS TO THE IF I WANTED TO HAVE A SALON AT MY HOME, WAS IT REQUIRED FOR ME TO HAVE THE BUSINESS TAX RECEIPTS? IF I HAVE TO HAVE THAT FOR THAT PURPOSE, THEN THAT SHOULD BE CLEARLY DEFINED. IF A PERSON CLAIMING TO HAVE A BUSINESS IN THE WITHIN THE VILLAGE AND WANT TO SIT ON THE BOARD. BUT WE CAN GO AHEAD AND PUT TOGETHER LANGUAGE LINES . JUST OFFER ONE LAST THOUGHT BEFORE YOU ALL MOVE ON TO ITEM FOR, UM WASN'T THE PRIMARY THING WE THOUGHT WE WERE GOING TO

[01:45:05]

DISCUSS WITHOUT BEING MOSTLY DIRECTED TOWARDS THE BUSINESS PORTION, BUT YOU BRING UP RESIDENCY THAT THAT CAN BRAISE ITS OWN. UHH FUN THINGS. UM IN BROUGHT UP THE IDEA OF SEASONAL RESIDENTS. WE HAVE A WHOLE COMMUNITY THAT IS INCREDIBLY INTEGRAL TO THE COMMUNITY THAT'S MADE UP IN PART OF SEASONAL RESIDENTS. UM AND IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT VERY MANY OF THEM. THERE ARE REGISTERED VOTERS OF THE VILLAGE. HOWEVER I WOULD SUGGEST YOU THERE IS A COMPLICATION. IN AH, CHANGE EFFECTIVELY. WHAT YOU'D BE DOING IS CHANGING THE REQUIREMENT FOR TO QUALIFY FOR THE RESIDENCY. TRACK. YOU'RE CHANGING FROM THE RESIDENCY TRACK TO THE VOTER TRACK. OKAY. YOU HAVE TO BE A VOTER. IS REALLY WHAT IT'S SAYING. UM AND THAT'S ALL WELL AND GOOD THAT DOES EXIST IN SOME JURISDICTIONS. BUT KEEP IN MIND THAT IS THAT WOULD BE SAYING TO A WHOLE CATEGORY OF FOLKS WHO WHO AH, ARE NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE AND THERE ARE A LOT OF THEM OR CANNOT BE REGISTERED TO VOTE BUT ARE OTHERWISE VERY CLEARLY A RESIDENT OF THE VILLAGE FOR EVERY PURPOSE THAT THEY COULDN'T BE ON THE BOARD. I WOULDN'T EVEN BRING THAT UP IN MOST COMMUNITIES, BUT, UM IN THIS COMMUNITY. THERE'S VERY MUCH POSSIBILITY THAT MAYBE FOLKS WHO ARE RESIDENTS, BUT OR NOT VOTERS, SO I CAN PLAY AROUND WITH TRYING TO COME UP WITH SOME OTHER LANGUAGE, UM, THAT THAT MAY NAIL THAT DOWN A LITTLE BIT. UM BUT. QUESTION SINCE WE THIS BOARD MEETS HERE AROUND HOW COULD WE HAVE SOMEONE WHO IS ONLY HERE? SEASONALLY. THAT'S TRUE. LIKE SENSE. I THINK I THINK, ELIMINATING SOMEBODY BECAUSE THEY'RE SEASONABLE.

THERE'S A LARGE PORTION OF THE COMMUNITY THAT IS SEASONAL THAT DO OWN HOMES THAT DO PAY REAL ESTATE TAXES THAT HAVE RESIDENCY. I MEAN BEYOND MYSELF OR ANYBODY ON THIS BOARD. I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY WE'RE TRYING TO EXCLUDE THOSE PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE PART OF THE COMMUNITY AND THERE ARE REAL PART OF THE COMMUNITY. A SEASONAL PERSON THAT COMES DOWN HERE FROM NEW YORK OR FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE. THERE ARE NEIGHBORS. WHY ARE WE TRYING TO EXCLUDE THEM FROM BEING ABLE TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD AND HAVE A VOICE? I CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION. UM WHY WOULD YOU ALLOW SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT LIVE HERE? TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR THOSE WHO DO. THANK YOU REMEMBER PRESLEY? THANK YOU. MEMBER SAHA. YAK DIRECTOR JEFFERSON. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU HAVE OUR DIRECTIONS YOURSELF. GOT SOME STUFF TO WORK ON THEM. WE JUST HAVE ONE MORE PUBLIC COMMENTS. PUBLIC COMMENTS, MADAM CHAIR, OKAY? YES, MA'AM, GLADYS. IT'S BEEN QUITE A FEW YEARS. SENSE. THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR PC TO REFERS DISCUSSED AND ONE OF THE REASONS THAT THEY SELECTED OR DECIDED IN THIS WAS THE COUNCIL. THAT MAKES A DECISION, SO EVERYBODY HAS TO BE VETTED THROUGH THE COUNCIL. THEY MAKE DECISIONS. BUT THEY WERE TRYING TO INCLUDE PEOPLE WHO WERE MAKING INVESTMENTS IN THE VILLAGE. NOT TO GUARANTEE THAT THEY HAD A PLACE ON THE BOARD BUT TO GIVE THE COUNCIL MEMBERS AUCTIONS SO THAT IF THEY FELT THERE WAS A NEED THAT THEY COULD APPOINT SOMEBODY. WHO HAD A BUSINESS INTERESTS. IN THE VILLAGE. BUT DID NOT NECESSARILY LIVE HERE. I DON'T I HOPE THAT YOU DON'T FORGET THAT IN THIS DISCUSSION. BECAUSE IT IS THE COUNCIL. THAT DECIDES IN THE VOTE ON AS A GROUP. IT'S NOT ONE PERSON. THE OTHER THING IS I CHECKED WITH A TAX COLLECTOR. ABOUT VIRTUAL BUSINESSES OPERATING IN MARTIN COUNTED AND THEY CAN OPERATE IN MARTIN COUNTY WITHOUT A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT FROM MARTIN COUNTY.

BECAUSE THEY HAVE A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT IN ANOTHER COUNTY. THAT THEY DON'T REQUIRE THAT THEY HAVE ANOTHER BUSINESS CAPTURING , SEE IF THERE ARE VIRTUAL BUSINESS. UM AND WE DON'T HAVE ONE YET. IN INDIAN TOWN FROM MY UNDERSTANDING. UM AND I'M A HOME BEATS BUSINESS OR WILL BE AND THERE ARE A LOT OF HOME BASED BUSINESSES. CHRISTOPHER GOT A HOME BASED BUSINESS. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THE VILLAGE IS WORKING ON I UNDERSTAND. SO HAVING THATD MEASURE OF QUALIFICATIONS THAT

[01:50:15]

YOUR INTEREST IS IN INDIAN TOWN. AND MARTIN COUNTY DISTRICT CHOIR. VOTER REGISTRATION. FOR MEMBERSHIP ON SOME OF ITS BOARD. OUR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. EVERY SINGLE SOLITARY MEMBER OF EVERY SINGLE SOLITARY NEIGHBORHOOD ADVISORY COMMITTEE HAS TO BE REGISTERED VOTER AND THAT WAS DETERMINED TO DETERMINE THEIR RESIDENCY. AND THE SNOW BIRD. IS ARRESTED INTO IF THEY'RE REGISTERED TO VOTE HERE. AND THEY PAY TAXES HERE. SO THEY ARE A RESIDENT, AND THEY MEET THE REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY'RE HERE FOR THE MEETINGS. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT YOU'RE BETTER OFF NOT TO TRY TO EXCLUDE SNOWBIRDS ARE PART TIME RESIDENTS BECAUSE THEY LIVED HERE FOR AT LEAST SIX MONTHS AND ONE DAY. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MA'AM. WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS. ARE THERE ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS? NO, MADAM CHAIR, OKAY? BOARD MR CHAIR. I JUST WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ONE LAST COMMENT THAT I DO SUPPORT CLARIFYING THE DEFINITION TO ADD A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT AS ONE WAY OF QUALIFYING. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT ADDITION. SO MOVING FORWARD. I JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT ON RECORD, OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU HAVE A QUESTION OR COMMENT. UM WE'RE MAYBE I'LL JUST STOP SURE ABOUT THE PROCEDURE. UM ARE WE GOING TO TAKE UP THE ISSUE OF THE NUMBER OF CHANGING IT FROM 7 TO 5 TO THAT? YES THAT WOULD BE ON THE NEXT ITEM THAT I BELIEVE. YEAH OKAY. PUT YOUR NAME TAG DOWN. PUT YOUR NAME DOWN. YOU HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION? SORRY, OKAY. ALRIGHT, MADAM CHAIR. UM DIRECTOR JEFFERSON. SO WHAT? WE EAT THEM. ITEM YOU WANT ME TO READ THE ITEM INTO THE WE NEED TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT, UM, ITEM THREE. WE WERE JUST WE WERE JUST LOOKING FOR SOME SOME OKAY, FEEDBACK OR SHAFT TO, UH, PUT SOME LANGUAGE TOGETHER. YOU CAN TAKE A LOOK AT LATER. OKAY THAT FEEDBACK. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU

[4.  

Application No. LDR-22-010 - A request to Amend the Indiantown Land Development Regulations to Revise the Required Number of PZAB Members and to Revise the PZAB Quorum Count.

]

VERY MUCH. OKAY, SO LET'S PROCEED TO ITEM FORM. TWO I RAISED. YES I'M SORRY.

APPLICATION NUMBER LD R DASH 22 010 A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDIAN TOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT.

REGULATIONS TO REVISE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF P C. A B MEMBERS AND TO REVISE THE P G A.

B CORUM COUNT. YES SO PLAIN AND SIMPLE. STAFF WON'T GO THROUGH THE. THE POWER POINT ON THIS ONE. YOU KNOW THE PROCESS. YOU KNOW WHAT WE'RE DOING THAT ESSENTIALLY THE QUANTUM NUMBER WILL BE THE LAST PART OF THIS DISCUSSION BECAUSE YOU FIRST NEED TO DETERMINE THE MAKEUP OF THE BOARD, THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS AND OKAY, THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE FORUM. YOUR PLEASURE WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. IF THERE ARE ANY AND YET, LET ME JUST GO AHEAD AND STATE FIRST STAFF HAS THERE'S NO STAFF RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO THIS ITEM HERE. THIS DRAFT ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU IS A TOOL FOR MARKING UP, OKAY, WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU IS LANGUAGE THAT'S BEEN HIGHLIGHTED. IT'S SHOWING THE LANGUAGE IF IT WERE THE DESIRED TO TWEAK AROUND NUMBER OF MEMBERS, BUT IGNORE THE STRIKETHROUGH AND UNDERLYING THEIR FOCUS ON THE HIGHLIGHTED PORTIONS. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT'S BEFORE YOU. THERE HAS BEEN DISCUSSIONS PERIPHERAL TO THE IDEA AND MORE DIRECTLY TO THE IDEA OF MAKING CHANGES TO THE ACTUAL COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS ON THAT IT'S WITHIN YOUR PURVIEW TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS BECAUSE RECOMMENDATION TO CHANGE THE LD OURS. UM AND SO LOOKING AT THAT. THIS WOULD BE THE TIME TO DISCUSS WHETHER IT BE YOUR RECOMMENDATION TO. DO ANY MANNER OF THINGS, INCLUDING GOING TO FIVE MEMBERS THAT ARE JUST RESIDENTS OR WHAT HAVE YOU AS OUR AS JEFFERSON INDICATED WITH WHATEVER RECOMMENDATION YOU MAKE THAT WOULD INVOLVE A TWEAK TO THE QUORUM REQUIREMENTS, ONE WHERE THE OTHER TWO CLEAN THAT UP, BUT THAT'S SECONDARY TO THE REST OF THIS. THIS IS I BELIEVE

[01:55:05]

PAGE 24 IN THE PACKAGE. WHERE THE HIGHLIGHTED LANGUAGE THAT THE VILLAGE ATTORNEY MENTIONED IS LOCATED. BEATING HIM TO PAGE 25. IT IS PAGE. ONE AND TWO, UH , THE ATTACHMENT TO THE STAFF REPORT FOR THIS SIDE. SO I'D RECOMMEND YOU OPEN IT UP FOR ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT. OKAY? ALL RIGHT, UM. IMPORT MEMBERS GOING TO START WITH YOU, OKAY? I JUST AGREE WITH THE REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF SEATS. THE CURRENT POPULATION IN INDIAN TOWN IS EXCEEDS 7000 AT THIS TIME, AND I DON'T FEEL THAT FIVE. IS A FAIR NUMBER TO SHOW. A FAIR REPRESENTATION OF OUR COMMUNITY.

ESPECIALLY WITH THE IMPENDING GROWTH THEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IT JUST DOESN'T COMPUTE FOR ME.

WELL, I'D LIKE TO SAY ALSO THAT I THINK SEVEN IS MUCH STRONGER THAN FIVE BECAUSE FIVE TAKES FEWER MEMBERS TO CONSTITUTE A QUORUM. AND EVEN FEWER VOTES TO MAKE A DECISION. FEWER PEOPLE IS FEWER HEADS ON THE ISSUES AND FEWER VOICES. IT MAKES THE BOARD WEAKER. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ONE MEMBER HAS TO RECUSE? I THINK, ACCORDING TO A CHART, I LOOKED UP THE QUORUM WOULD THEN BE THREE. UM AND THE OTHER THING THAT THIS IS A LITTLE OUTSIDE OF JUST THE NUMBER. BUT WHAT ABOUT LANGUAGE FOR THE APPLICATION? WHERE WOULD THAT BE? YOU KNOW, LANGUAGE. CONCERNING. FILLING OUT AN APPLICATION TO BE ON THIS SPORT. REMEMBER PERSONALLY, THAT'S JUST STICK WITH THIS.

THIS IS HOW WE GET CONFUSED. LET'S JUST STICK WITH, UM COMMENTS ABOUT THE SEVEN OR FIVE MILLION SO THAT I DON'T KNOW. ARE YOU READY FOR A MOTION? NO WE'RE NOT MAKING THE MOTION EVERYBODY GOING TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY DISPLAY AND THEN WE'LL GO FROM THERE. STAY WITH THE NUMBER SEVEN, OKAY? ALL RIGHT. OKAY, SO I WOULD SAY THAT I WOULD ALSO BE IN FAVOR OF KEEPING OUR CURRENT NUMBER AT SEVEN. WE'RE FIVE OF THOSE MEMBERS AS IT CURRENTLY STANDS FIVE OF THOSE MEMBERS BEING OF THE COMMUNITY AND THEN THE OTHER TWO BEING TO BUSINESS PEOPLE, YOU KNOW. THAT SUPPORTS OR WITHIN THE VILLAGE. OKAY? ALL RIGHT. UM UH, REMEMBER, REMEMBER SIDE REMEMBER SO HIGH ALREADY HERE, MISTURA, I DO APOLOGIZE EVERY TIME I INTERRUPT, JO JUST TRYING IT BECAUSE I'M ON ZOOM. UM I'LL WOULD ALSO SUPPORT THE, UM SEVEN AND AGAIN. I JUST WANT TO REPEAT IT. YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY DESERVES A VOICE AND IT'S NICE TO SEE THAT THERE IS A YOU KNOW AGREEMENT ON THAT ACROSS THE BOARD. SO IT'S YOU KNOW, AT LEAST SEEMS TO BE SO THAT'S THAT'S MY TWO CENTS. THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY IS A PART OF THE COMMUNITY, JUST LIKE THE RESIDENTS ARE AND IT'S YOU KNOW, DIVORCE, THE MORE VOICES, THE MORE DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES AND IT'S A POSITIVE THING. THANK YOU MEMBERS OF HIGH. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON IT? YES, I HAVE MISS BARBARA CLAUDIUS. OKAY, THEN I HAVE NO FURTHER. OKAY? BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SAY, UM. AGREE THAT THE, UM THE SEVEN MEMBERS MAKE US STRONGER AND BUT I DON'T. I DON'T WANT TO. I DON'T THINK THAT WE SHOULD JUST SAY, UM FUN. FIVE RESIDENTS TO BUSINESS PEOPLE. WHAT IF WE CAN'T FIND TWO BUSINESS PEOPLE THAT WOULD CONSTANTLY HAVE TO RECUSE THEMSELVES? I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW. UM, DIRECTLY JEFFERSON AND ATTORNEY OF OURS. IS THAT SOMETHING? IS THAT THE LANGUAGE OF THE COUNCIL? SO YES , THE LANGUAGE CURRENTLY ADDRESSES THAT IT SAYS THERE ARE SEVEN MEMBERS, OKAY? AND THEN IT PUTS A CAP ON THE NUMBER OF FOLKS WHO CAN BE NONRESIDENT BUSINESS OWNER MEMBERS. OKAY, THE COUNCIL IN APPOINTING FOLKS COULD MAKE ALL SEVEN OF THE ALL SEVEN OF THE PCB BOARD MEMBERS, RESIDENTS. RESIDENTS OKAY. AND NONE OF THE MONA BUSINESS ALRIGHT THE AND THAT WAS THIS WAS DISCUSSED A LOT. ALL RIGHT, AND IT WAS THIS DYNAMIC WAS AFTER A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS. BOUNCING GROUND WAS PRECISELY WHAT THEY LANDED ON. THE IDEA THAT IT'S SEVEN MEMBERS WITH A CAMP OF UP TO TWO. WHICH COULD MEAN 21 OR ZERO UP TO TWO NON

[02:00:10]

RESIDENT BUSINESS OWNERS. OKAY SO THERE'S NO THERE'S NO REQUIREMENT THAT THERE BE ANY NON RESIDENT BUSINESS OWNERS ON THE BABY. IT'S SIMPLY WITHIN THE VILLAGE COUNCILS POWER TO APPOINT UP TO TWO OF THEM. PRESIDENT BUSINESS ON THEM RIGHT? BECAUSE LET ME JUST JUST TO CLARIFY SOMETHING, OKAY? WE COULD HAVE ALL SEVEN OF YOU. BE RESIDENTS AND BUSINESS OWNERS BE THIS LANGUAGE DOES NOT DISQUALIFY SOMEONE JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE A BUSINESS OWNER, BUT THEY HAPPEN TO RESIDE IN THE VILLAGE. OKAY BASICALLY TWO WAYS YOU CAN QUALIFY. YOU'RE EITHER A RESIDENT. RIGHT, OR YOU'RE A NON RESIDENT BUSINESS OWNER. BUT THERE'S A CAP OF UP TO TWO. NON RESIDENT BUSINESS OWNERS. SO THE NON REST? YEAH I JUST LET ME JUST MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR, NONRESIDENT BUSINESS ON THE MEANING THAT THEY CAN BE A BUSINESS OWNER BUT NOT A RESIDENT CORRECT INDIAN TOWN. I DON'T LIKE THAT LANGUAGE. RIGHT? YOU KNOW, AND THAT'S WHY WE HAVE AN ISSUE. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. THAT WE DELETE THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE TWO WERE STILL WE'RE STILL IN DISCUSSION . PLEASE PLEASE LET HER FINISH. ITS MEMBERS ARE HIRED. LET HER FINISH. THANK YOU. YES, MR. THANK YOU. OH, SORRY THAT WE DELETE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A BUSINESS OWNER AND, UH, MOVE THAT THEY BE SEVEN RESIDENTS. AGAIN, YOU KNOW? WHY WOULD YOU ALLOW SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT LIVE HERE TO MAKE THE DECISIONS AND VOTE? SORRY ONCE YOU MAKE ONCE YOU MADE A MOTION, AND THEN YOU'RE COMMENTING REMEMBER SEVEN DIET MEMBERS TOO HIGH YET? THANK YOU. WELL. THAT'S MY REASONING. OKAY? IN MOTION. MANAGER OKAY, LET ME HEAR WHAT, UM, MEMBERS OF HIGH A SAY, I REMEMBER SAID HI AND MEMBER PERSONALLY, I JUST WANT TO, HUH? I SUGGEST YOU I SUGGEST YOU SEE WHETHER OR NOT YOU HAVE A SECOND DO WE HAVE A SECOND? AWESOME, DAD. OKAY MEMBERS OF HIGHER. BUT YEAH, IF I MAY, AND I APOLOGIZE FOR JUMPING IN ALL THE TIME, BUT I AM ON ZOOM AND IT SEEMS THAT WE'RE HAVING A DISCUSSION. BUT THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN EMOTION IS MADE AND IT CUTS OFF THE DISCUSSION. SO IF THERE'S EMOTION, THAT'S FINE. BUT BEFORE THAT, WE GO TO THE MOTION. WE SHOULD GIVE PEOPLE A CHANCE TO AT LEAST COMMENT BEFORE GOES TO MOTION IF WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF DISCUSSION I AGREE WITH YOU REMEMBER SAID HI. BUT IF, UM IF WE ALL ARE BEING COURTESY LAWS. AND CURLY C POLICIES. YOU ALL WOULD. EVERYBODY WOULD ABIDE BY THAT. NOT JUST ONE OR TWO, BUT ALL OF US. OKAY, SO WHEN SOMEONE ELSE HAS THE FLOOR, LET THEM FINISH. AS THE CHAIR. I WILL MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE HAS EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO SAY WHAT THEY NEED TO SAY. AND I'LL DO THE CORRECT THING. THANK YOU. BUT THANK YOU, MR WELCOME. SO MR RECOMMENDATION IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER UM. ANY OTHER RECOMMENDED CHANGES. I THINK I HEARD FROM MOST ALL OF YOU THAT THAT YOU'RE IN FAVOR OF SEVEN AND EMOTION WAS PUT ON THE FLOOR TO KEEP IT AT SEVEN BUT TO REMOVE THE OPTION TO HAVE NON RESIDENT BUSINESS OWNERS, AND THERE WASN'T A SECOND FOR THAT. THINK THAT THAT. THAT KIND OF EXHAUST . MOST OF THE DYNAMICS STAFF WAS CONTEMPLATING, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WERE ANY OTHER MOTIONS THAT BOARD MEMBERS MAY HAVE.

WELL, I THINK IT'S JUST I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ALL LOOK CLEAR. I WAS THINKING THAT IF WE REMAINED AT SEVEN BUT WE WILL IF WE HAVE BUSINESS. OWNERS ON THE BOARD THAT THEY WILL COME FROM INDIAN TOWN. THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING. SO AND LETS YOU MEAN BECAUSE YOU HAVE A BUSINESS OWNER, AND THEY NOT ONLY OWN A BUSINESS AND IN IN INDIAN TOWN, BUT ALSO ALSO RESIDE IN INDIAN TOWN. THAT'S MY THOUGHTS. YES. IT'S JUST MY THOUGHT. I DON'T KNOW. DO ANYONE ELSE SHADOWS

[02:05:01]

STARTS ON THE BOARD? I AM. LET ME JUST CLARIFY. YOU'RE SAYING SEVEN MEMBERS ON THE BOARD AND THAT THEY ALL BE RESIDENTS? NO NO. YES THEY'RE ALL RESIDENTS. BUT IF WE HAVE BUSINESS MEMBERS , BUSINESS MEMBERS ARE RESIDENTS THERE RESIDENT AND THEY? YEAH, BUT THAT'S IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER YOU HAVE A BUSINESS OR NOT, YOU ARE SEVEN RESIDENTS. AND I SAY THAT BECAUSE WE'RE SIX NOW, UH OR DEPENDING BUT, UM. YOU HAVE PEOPLE WHO THEY'VE HAD TROUBLE FINDING A LOCAL PERSON, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE SOMEONE WHO OWNS A BUSINESS, NOT SOMEONE WHO IS A REPRESENTATIVE OR AN EMPLOYEE OF THAT BUSINESS BUT WHO ACTUALLY OWNS THE BUSINESS. THAT'S WHAT THE LANGUAGE SAYS.

NOW IT SAYS YOU HAVE TO BE THE OWNER OF A BUSINESS WITHIN THE VILLAGE. AND WE HAVEN'T SEEMED TO. I MEAN, THAT IS LIKE CLEAR. STAY TO ME. UM IT ZOOM OR OUT OF YOUR CAR DOES NOT QUALIFY. YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PHYSICAL ADDRESS WITHIN THE VILLAGE. OKAY, UM ANYWAY, YOU'RE SAYING SEVEN RESIDENTS, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY OWN A BUSINESS OR NOT CORRECT. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT MY MOTION WAS SEVEN RESIDENTS AND YOU JUST YOU KNOW, YOU DON'T HAVE TO SAY TO HAVE TO OWN A BUSINESS BECAUSE A LOT OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BUSINESSES HERE OUR LANDSCAPING OR EVENT.

PLANNERS OR THINGS THAT ARE SUPER. THEY JUST PHYSICALLY DON'T HAVE THE TIME TO SERVE, AND IT'S BEEN HARD TO GET SEVEN. MR CHAIR IF I MAY GO AHEAD. THE, UH. THERE ARE SEVEN SEATS ON THIS BOARD. FIVE ARE RESIDENTS THAT YOU RIGHT? SO THEY'RE THE TWO APPOINTMENT OF THE OF THE BUSINESS SEATS. YOU HAVE TO OWN A BUSINESS, SO THERE ARE BUSINESSES WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN. THAT, UM. YOU KNOW THAT ARE NOT RESIDENTS, SO THE RESIDENTS WILL ALWAYS BE HEARD.

AND THERE THEY ARE. THE MAJORITY . THERE ARE FIVE SEATS OF RESIDENTS, FOR INSTANCE, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE THERE ARE RESTAURANT CHAINS. THAT YOU KNOW, THE OWNER MAY LIVE. IN A IN ANOTHER STATE, BUT THEY HAVE A BUSINESS HERE OR THEY LIVE SOMEWHERE ELSE. SO MAYBE THEY LIVE 20 MINUTES AWAY. MAYBE THEY LIVE, BUT THEY DO HAVE A BUSINESS HERE. THEY'RE EMPLOYING PEOPLE. THEY'RE PAYING PEOPLE SALARIES. THEY'RE PROVIDING INCOMES FOR FAMILIES TO PAY RENT TO PURCHASE A HOME AND THOSE, ONLY THOSE TWO SEATS ARE THE TWO SEATS THAT ALLOW SOMEBODY THAT IS JUST A BUSINESS OWNER TO HAVE A VOICE ON THIS BOARD. SO THE RESIDENTS WILL ALWAYS HAVE A VOICE AND A MAJORITY IN THE FIVE SEATS. THE TWO SEATS FOR THE BUSINESS OWNERS IS PURELY FOR ITS, UM, I IT IS A MINORITY OUT OF THE SEVEN, BUT IT RESERVES SOME SORT OF VOICE. FOR THOSE PEOPLE THAT DON'T LIVE HERE IN A RESIDENT SENSE, BUT YOU KNOW, ARE VERY THEIR DAY TO DAY. IT'S PROBABLY YOU KNOW, FOCUSING ON TRYING TO RUN A GOOD BUSINESS WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIA ATTEMPT, SO I WOULD I WOULD URGE EVERYBODY TO INCLUDE EVERYBODY'S VOICE. THERE'S ONLY TWO SEATS FOR THE BUSINESS OWNERS IN SOME MINORITY, BUT AGAIN, WE SHOULDN'T BE SILENCING. NOBODY'S TRYING TO SILENCE MR ANITA FROM SPEAKING ON THIS BOARD. OR OR ANYBODY ELSE ON THIS BOARD. UM I DIDN'T MEAN A SINGLE MR ANITA OUT, BUT YOU KNOW IF ALL VOICES ARE ALLOWED TO BE PRESENT, YOU CAN HAVE AGREEMENTS DISAGREEMENTS. YOU VOTE ON THINGS. AND IT GIVES EVERYBODY A CHANCE TO BE HURT. THANK YOU, MR. SAY IT. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. SMILING SO I'M GOING TO HAVE TO SAY THAT I DISAGREE WITH YOU GUYS NOTION THAT ALL SEVEN SEATS SHOULD BE FOR RESIDENTS AND THE REASON WHY I DISAGREE IS BECAUSE IF I WAS NOT A RESIDENT OF INDIAN TIME, BUT I WAS A RIGHTFUL BUSINESS OWNER WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF INDIAN TOWN, AND IF I WAS ELECTED OR SELECTED BY SOMEONE WHO SITS ON THE COUNCIL TO REPRESENT THE BIT BUSINESS ENTITY OF THE VILLAGE. I WOULD WANT TO RIGHTFULLY DO SO. I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO LIVE HERE IF I HAVE A VESTED INTERESTS IN THE COMMUNITY. RALLY POINT. OKAY, SO AT THIS POINT, WE CAN MAKE IT. I'M SORRY, MR CHAIR. I DO, BOY.

GO AHEAD AND I JUST WANT TO. I DID WANT TO SAY THAT THE PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS OF HAVING A BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT. IT'S NOT A IT IS A GOOD ADDITION TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS A PRESENCE WITHIN THE VILLAGE. SO INSTEAD OF GETTING RID OF THE BUSINESS PEOPLE FURTHER DEFINE WHAT IT

[02:10:06]

MEANS TO HAVE A PRESENCE WITHIN THE VILLAGE, AND THAT'S DEFINITELY ONE WAY TO DO THAT.

THANK YOU, MR. OKAY. THANK YOU. BALLOT POINT. SORT OF FALLS. WE HAVE. WHY ARE YOU DRESSED HER? YOU SHOULD BE ADDRESSING ME. SHE WAS JUST TELLING THE CLERK WHO'S AND MAKE A PUBLIC HOME. THE ROOMS. COME UP, OKAY. AND THEN I HAD ONE MORE AFTER HER. ONE MORE OKAY? THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. YES. YES, FATHER. THIS. SOMETIMES WE FORGET. THAT HOW NEW WE ARE BUT. IT'S THE INVESTMENT THAT WE NEEDED AN INDIAN TOWN FOR SO MANY YEARS. AND BUSINESS OWNERS ARE THE ONES WHO PROVIDED JOBS. AND AFFECT SO MANY RESIDENTS WITH THEIR LIVELIHOODS. SO THAT'S WHY THE COUNCIL MEMBERS WANTED TO INCLUDE NON RESIDENTS BECAUSE WE HAVE BUSINESSES. SO MANY BUSINESSES. THANK GOODNESS. WHO WANT TO INVEST THEIR MILLIONS BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN INDIAN TOWN. AND ALL YOU'RE DOING IS GIVING THE COUNCIL OPTIONS. SO THAT THEY CAN SELECT WHO MAKE FEEL MEETS THE NEEDS THAT THEY'RE LOOKING FOR. BY ELIMINATING IT, MAKING IT MORE STRAIGHT. THEN YOU'RE ELIMINATING SOME OF THOSE OPTIONS THAT YOUR COUNCIL HAS AND SELECTING FEEL. IS NEEDED TO BALANCE THE INTERESTS. OF INDIAN TOWN. THAT'S BASICALLY THE ONLY REASON THAT THEY. DECIDED ON NONRESIDENT BUSINESS CENTER. I DO THINK. THAT. WE DON'T ADVERTISE ENOUGH. AND THAT'S WHY WE DON'T GET APPLICATIONS TO THE COUNCIL, OR LETTERS OF INTEREST TO THE COUNCIL TO SERVE THEM PC. A BOARD. I MEAN, I'VE I'VE NEVER SEEN IT IN THE VILLAGE NEWSLETTER, FOR INSTANCE. AND I THINK IT WOULD BE IMPORTANT TO MAKE IT IMPORTANT. IN THE NEWSLETTER THAT. THERE'S A VACANCY AND THEY'RE SEEKING LETTERS OF INTEREST. TWO. THE VILLAGE MANAGER. OR TO WHOMEVER WOULD BE COLLECTING.

APPLICATIONS TO SIT ON THESE BOARDS BECAUSE SO MANY PEOPLE AREN'T EVEN AWARE. OF WHAT YOU'RE DOING, AND IT'S ANOTHER WAY OF LETTING PEOPLE KNOW THIS IS A VITALLY IMPORTANT BOARD.

AND I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU DO, AND I APPRECIATE YOUR DISCUSSIONS, AND IT'S MORE WORK THAN PEOPLE REALIZE, TOO. SO I WANT YOU TO KNOW I APPRECIATE YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MA'AM. APPRECIATE YOU. KEVIN POWERS. GOOD EVENING, AND THANKS AGAIN. MY INTENT HERE IS ONLY TO HELP YOU MAKE THE VERY BEST DECISION YOU CAN AND THINGS COME TO MIND THAT I JUST FEEL COMPELLED TO SHARE WITH YOU. AND WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT YOU KNOW, A RESIDENT WITHIN THE VILLAGE THAT DOESN'T MEAN AN ISLAND AND EVERYTHING ELSE IS AN OCEAN, RIGHT? THAT'S A IT'S A IT'S A LINE. IT'S A ROAD. IT'S A BOUNDARY THAT DEFINES INDIAN TOWN. THERE'S A LOT OF FOLKS THAT HAVE BUSINESSES THAT ARE IN INDIAN TOWN, BUT THEY'RE RIGHT ACROSS THAT LINE AND THE THOUGHT RIGHT WHETHER IT'S SOMEBODY IN SAINT LUCIE MOBILE VILLAGE SPRING HAVEN. CLEMENTS VILLE THAT YOU WOULD SUGGEST THEY'RE NOT A RESIDENT OF INDIAN TOWN STRIKES A CHORD WITH A LOT OF THEM. ONE THAT COMES TO MIND IS P O. BOX NUMBER ONE. TECHNICALLY IS NOT A RESIDENT. BUT THEIR FAMILY HAVE BEEN HERE LONGER THAN ANYBODY I KNOW. AND JUST SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT, UH, WHEN? WHEN YOU CONTEMPLATE WHAT IS AND WHAT ISN'T A RESIDENT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY MORE CALM. PUBLIC COMMENTS. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. MADAM CHAIR, OKAY? CAN I JUST THIS FOR A SECOND? DANIEL BROUGHT UP A VERY GOOD POINT WHEN HE WAS TALKING ABOUT KEEPING THOSE BUSINESS. FIVE MEMBERS CARRIES A WEIGHT AND I REMEMBER WHEN. WE INCORPORATED THE CONVERSATION WAS THE BUSINESSMAN. THAT WERE ASKED. TO BE ON THE BOARD WAS TO ASSIST

[02:15:03]

BECAUSE WE DON'T ALL HAVE A BACKGROUND AND IT'S A IT'S A LEARNING PROCESS, AND THEY HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE TO GUIDE US. SO I'M I'M I'M WHEN I SAY THAT. I LIKED STICKING WITH SEVEN. I'M I AGREE WITH KRISTA? MM HMM. THAT FIVE. CITIZENS AND TO BUSINESS OWNERS. THIS IS THE PERFECT BREAKDOWN. OKAY, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NOW WE CAN MAKE A MOTION. LET LET ME SUGGEST IF THE BOB. A MOTION. TO EFFECTIVELY LEAVE EVERYTHING THE WAY IT IS. THEN THE ONLY THING WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU DO. IS. APPROVE EMOTION, RECOMMENDING THE ORDINANCE. THAT'S BEFORE YOU KEEPING THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD THE SAME BUT FIXING THE QUORUM REQUIREMENT. IF YOU ALL REMEMBER FROM BEFORE THERE WAS A TYPO IN THERE SO THAT THERE'S A QUORUM OF THAT THIS BOARD OF SEVEN HAS A QUORUM OF THREE. THAT DOESN'T COMPUTE UNDER FLORIDA LAW IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE FOR IT'S GOT TO AT LEAST BE A MAJORITY OF IT. SO UM THIS ORDINANCE WILL GET A LOT SHORTER IN A VERSION THAT WOULD BE TRANSMITTED TO THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, BUT. IF IT WAS THE INCLINATION OF MAJORITY OF THE MEMBERS TO KEEP THE COMPOSITION AS IT IS RECOMMENDED. THE MOTION WOULD BE TO PROVE THE ORDINANCE.

WITH THE LANGUAGE BEING THAT THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD IS MAINTAINED, BUT THE QUORUM IS SET TO FOUR. OKAY? AND DECLARE IT TO SIMPLIFY THINGS. SOMEONE CAN SAY SO. MOVED. SOME MOVED.

THAT WE NEED A SECOND. SOME OAT , I'LL SECOND READY FOR THE VOTE. IT'S MANAGER BOARD MEMBER BANKS. YES, REMEMBER PRESSLER? NO. FOR MEMBERS OF HAYEK. YES. BOARD MEMBER WILLIAMS. YES CHAIR. MILEY YES. SARAH PALMER? YES. OKAY? IT SEEMS WE HAVE COME TO THE END. DIRECTOR DO HAVE THE DIRECTORS REPORTED BEFORE I GET INTO THAT YOU DO HAVE A MEMBER. THAT'S. TO BE RECOGNIZED. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. REMEMBER PRESIDENT? YES I'D LIKE TO. UM SINCE THIS WHOLE ISSUE HAS BROUGHT TO LIGHT HAVING SOMEONE WHO HAS IS INVOLVED IN COMMERCIAL REALTY AND NUMEROUS PROPERTIES IN THE FUTURE, THIS SOMETHING SIMILAR OR MAYBE NOT TO THIS DEGREE BUT COULD BE HAPPENING AGAIN. AND I THINK IT WOULD BE WISE IF WE WOULD LOOK AT, UH WHAT CAN BE DONE FOR DISCLOSURE? IN OTHER WORDS, MOST OF US HAVE OUR HOMEOWNERS. WE HAVE A HOME AND THAT'S IT, BUT YOU MAY HAVE PEOPLE COMING ON THIS BOARD WHO HAVE NUMEROUS PROPERTIES AND UP UNTIL NOW WE HAVE TRUSTED THEM AND TAKING THEM AT THEIR WORD AS TO HOW MANY PROPERTIES ARE INVOLVED IN YOU KNOW, UM AND I THINK MORE IS NEEDED. YOU KNOW, DO WE NEED TO VISIT THIS ANNUALLY MONTHLY? IMMEDIATELY YOU KNOW WHEN SOMEONE ACQUIRES PROPERTY, OR, YOU KNOW IS GOING TO GET A COMMISSION OR SOMETHING ON PROPERTY THAT THEY DISCLOSE IT IMMEDIATELY. UM AND THAT YOU KNOW WHEN YOU HAVE SOMEONE WHO HAS A LOT OF PROPERTIES THAT WE HAVE A MAP THAT THEY SUBMIT A MAP TO US BOARD MEMBERS OF WHERE THOSE PROPERTIES ARE, SO WE'RE AWARE OF WHAT IS ADJACENT TO SOMETHING ELSE THAT WE'RE ABOUT TO VOTE ON. WE DON'T KNOW UNLESS YOU HAVE PAPER AT THAT MEETING THAT SHOWS LOOK HERE. I OWN ALL THESE LOTS OR I'M A PARTNER IN THESE LOTS OR WHATEVER IT IS, BUT YOU NEED SOMETHING. NOT THAT YOU KNOW. IN OTHER WORDS, IT'S NOT FAIR TO SAY WE'RE GOING TO JUST TAKE THEIR THAT PERSON AT THEIR WORD TO SAY THAT THEY'RE GOING TO RECUSE WHEN THEY ARE AWARE. OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST . OKAY THAT NEEDS TO BE BEEFED UP. UH, MUCH MORE STRONGLY AND THE VILLAGE ATTORNEY DOESN'T HAVE TIME TO GO LOOK INTO WHAT PROPERTIES ANYONE ON THE BOARD WHO'S VOTING WHAT THEY OWN, YOUR SIMPLY TAKING THEIR WORD FOR IT, WHICH I FEEL IS UNFAIR. OKAY THANK YOU. MEMBER. PRESSLER UM, ATTORNEY VAULT STAFF IS NOTED. OKAY BUT I JUST WANT TO SAY, UM,

[02:20:08]

ATTORNEY BOSS, UM. THEIR THEIR LAWS, RIGHT AND WE'RE GOVERNING WHEN WE TOOK AN OATH TO BE HONEST AND BE BE TRANSPARENT, AND UNTIL THAT DISCRETION AND INTEGRITY DRIVERS AND MY CAREERD THIS IS THIS IS NOT AN ARGUMENT AGAINST NO, IT'S NOT THERE BECAUSE, AS WAS DISCUSSED AT THE LAST VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING UM , IT'S WITHIN THE PREROGATIVE. IT'S ULTIMATELY AGAIN WITHIN THE PRODUCT OF THE COUNCIL, BUT TO ADD ADDITIONAL ETHICS REQUIREMENTS. OKAY, WHETHER IT'S DISCLOSURE OR OTHER THINGS OR WHAT HAVE YOU UM, BUT I WILL TELL YOU AND I THINK EVERYBODY ON THIS BOARD UNDERSTANDS IT. AND CERTAINLY, FOLKS, I'VE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY IN INDIAN TOWN TO HAVE THOSE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT VOTING CONFLICTS, UNDERSTAND? THAT IT IS A WILDLY SERIOUS MATTER. AND IT IS, UM ANYONE WHO WOULD SEEK TO SKIRT AROUND THE VOTING CONFLICTS, LAWS OR OR FAILED TO DISCLOSE SOMETHING THEY ACTUALLY KNOW ABOUT. YOU HAVE INSTANCES. SOMETIMES I WILL TELL YOU WHERE THINGS COME UP AND THEY DIDN'T. THEY GENUINELY DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT IT TILL AFTERWARDS. THAT'S A DIFFERENT MATTER BUT WHERE THEY GENUINELY KNOW ABOUT IT AND THEN TRY TO GET CUTE AND SKIRT AROUND IT. THE STATE WILL COME DOWN ON THAT PERSON LIKE A TON OF BRICKS. UM AGAIN. I JUST OFFER THAT THAT'S NOT AN ARGUMENT AGAINST FINDS. WHO FINDS THAT OUT. WHO KNOWS? YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? UM AND SOMEONE CAN SAY WELL, I SPOKE TO MR VOS AND HE SAID, I DON'T HAVE TO RECUSE MYSELF. WELL, HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT EVEN WHAT PROPERTY YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. WHERE IS THAT PROPERTY LOCATED? IS IT ADJACENT TO SOMETHING THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION? WE DON'T KNOW, AND THAT WORK TO KNOW WHAT THAT PROPERTY IS, SHOULD NOT BE ON US AGAIN. HERE WE HAVE A COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE AGENT WITH OVER 20 LLCS IN EACH OF THOSE LLCS HAVE PROPERTIES WITHIN THEM. THERE'S A TRUST, WHICH SHELTERS THE NAME OF THE BENEFICIARIES WITHIN THAT, IN OTHER WORDS, IT'S COMPLICATED, AND I'M JUST SAYING SOMETHING SHOULD BE. PLACED ON MEMBERS OF THE BOARD TO DISCLOSE DISCLOSE THAT TO FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS ON PAPER. BECAUSE I'M IF I MAY MR DON'T KNOW. NO I WAS GOING TO SAY CHAIR MEMBERS OF HIGH GROWTH. OKAY BEFORE YOU SAY SOMETHING, UH, A MEMBER, SORAYA . I JUST WANTED TO ASK ATTORNEY VOTES. WHEN? WHEN, UM THE ONUS IS ON THE COUNCIL. AM I CORRECT BEFORE THEY APPOINT PEOPLE A BUSINESS PERSON TO THE BOARD, THE ONUS IS ON THEM BE ABLE TO KNOW WHAT THAT PERSON THE BUSINESSES THAT THAT PERSON OR PERSONS HAVE. IS THAT CORRECT? I WILL TELL YOU AND IT'S NOT JUST PARTICULARLY INDIAN TOWN. IT'S EVERYWHERE AROUND THE STATE. IT IS. IT IS NOT A COMMON PRACTICE TO DIG INTO THE COMPLETE POTENTIAL VOTING CONFLICTS OF ANY INDIVIDUAL AND POINTY BECAUSE, REMEMBER, THAT INCLUDES NOT JUST THAT PERSON, BUT THEIR RELATIVES THERE. YEAH THERE ANY SORT? YES. THEY'RE EXACTLY CERTAIN IN LAWS. UM, THERE. ANYONE WHO IS A CLIENT OF THEIRS OR THEIR EMPLOYER OR ANY OTHER SORT OF BUSINESS ASSOCIATES. IT CAN BECOME A WHOLE WEATHER THUGS. ALL OF THAT IS NOT USUALLY INQUIRED INTO BY ANY CITY OR COUNTY WITHIN THE STATE . IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THAT OFFICER, REMEMBER, EACH OF YOU IS AN OFFICER UNDER STATE LAW. YOU HAVE A LOT OF OBLIGATIONS WHEN IT COMES TO THIS IMPORTANT STUFF, AND AGAIN, IT COMES WITH SEVERE PENALTIES. UM SO THAT THAT'S ULTIMATELY WHERE THE ENFORCEMENT ITS MECHANISM IS AND THAT'S WHY WE DO OUR BEST TO I ENCOURAGE EACH OF YOU. YOU FEEL LIKE YOU'RE ANYWHERE CLOSE TO THE LINE. SO WE DID THAT TRAINING A COUPLE MONTHS AGO. IF YOU FEEL LIKE YOU'RE ANYWHERE CLOSE TO THE LINE. CALL HER OFFICE AND WE'LL TALK THROUGH IT BECAUSE I WILL. I WILL TELL YOU IT IS AND AGAIN, NOT A COUNTER ARGUMENT TO ANY THOUGHT ALONG THESE LINES, BUT UNIVERSALLY. I HAVE NEVER SEEN WHERE IT IS, IN THE INTEREST OF SOMEBODY WHO HAS A VOTING CONFLICT. WHERE IT'S IN THEIR INTEREST TO HIDE IT AND VOTE ON SOMETHING BECAUSE IT'S SO EASY TO JUST RECUSE YOURSELF . YOU SEE WHAT I'M SAYING? HOW WOULD THAT EVER BE DISCOVERED? YOU KNOW WHO'S GOING TO FIND THAT OUT? IF IT'S NOT ON PAPER,

[02:25:02]

YOU KNOW SOMEONE DISCLOSING WHAT PROPERTIES THEY HAVE AN INTEREST IN OR PARTNERSHIP OR A TRUST OR ANYTHING ELSE. HOW WOULD WE KNOW? HOW WOULD FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS BE DISCLOSED THAT INFORMATION? WE'D NEVER KNOW. THE CHAIR. AND I DON'T WANT TO BELABOR THE POINT. YES YES, WE'RE GONNA DIRECTORS REPORT BUT JUST OFFER THAT THOUGHT, UM. ULTIMATELY ENFORCEMENT OF ANY OF THESE LAWS IS ON. IT'S ON THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON ETHICS FOR FOUR ENFORCEMENT AND THE VOTING CONFLICTS. LAWS DON'T CONTEMPLATE THAT YOU DO THINGS TO THE SATISFACTION OF YOUR FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS ON A GIVEN BOARD, YOU SAID. I'M SAYING IT'S NOT. IT'S NOT UP TO A MAJORITY VOTE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT SOMEBODY HAS VOTED CONFLICT OR ANYTHING LIKE THIS. UM IT'S SUBJECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE STATE LAW. AND SO. IT IS. IT'S NOT GENERALLY AN ANALYSIS.

THAT'S THAT'S PART OF THE VOTING CONFLICTS, TOO. PREEMPTIVELY SATISFY FELLOW MEMBERS OF A GIVEN BOARD. I DON'T HAVE A CONFLICT, IT'S INCUMBENT UPON THEM TO RECOGNIZE WHETHER THEY HAVE A CONFLICT AND RECUSE THEMSELVES. AT THE RISK OF SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES IF THEY DON'T ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH MEMBERS OF HIGH END ARE YOU? DO YOU WANT TO ADDRESS? UM MEMBER OF PRESLEY'S COMMENT OUR WORK BECAUSE WE WANT TO MOVE ON. IF WE DON'T JUST WANTED TO QUICKLY ADD ONTO HER COMMENT THAT THERE THERE IS A REPORTING REQUIREMENT. THERE IS A FORM THAT THE VILLAGE PROVIDES US TO DISCLOSE ANY INTERESTS THAT WE HAVE. AND IT'S A STATE FORM IF I'M CORRECT AND EVERY PERSON ON THE BOARD, INCLUDING MYSELF, SHOULD FILL THAT OUT. AND, YOU KNOW, REPORT TO IT WHEN I SO I JUST WANTED TO ADD TO HER COMMENT THAT THERE IS YOU DO DISCLOSE WHAT YOU HAVE TO THE VILLAGE UNDER THEIR REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, OKAY? ALL RIGHT.

[10.  

March 2022 Director's Report

]

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT COMMENT. WE'RE MOVING FORWARD TO THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT. DIRECTOR JEFFERSON. THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR IN THE INTEREST OF TIME. I'LL JUST SAY THAT THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT INCLUDES A LIST OF THE CURRENT PROJECTS UNDER REVIEW THOSE THAT ARE RECENTLY APPROVED AND THOSE THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. IT WAS IN YOUR BACKUP. ALSO WE HAVE PROVIDED FOR YOU AND WILL DO SO. EVERY MONTH YOUR UPDATED ATTENDANCE RECORD FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR. NEXT SLIDE. AND THEN WE'VE ALSO PROVIDED FOR YOU A LONG RANGE AGENDA, WHICH IS ALREADY CHANGED BY THE WAY SO MM MM. AND THAT'S WHY I PICKED THAT LITTLE NOTE ON THE BOTTOM. BUT THIS IS JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT YOUR WORKLOAD MIGHT BE LIKE IN THE COMING MONTHS. SOMETIMES THINGS GET MOVED, AS THEY DID TONIGHT TO THE NEXT MEETING. AND HAVING TO MOVE TO ITEMS NOW, UM, WE MAY PUSH SOME THINGS OFF UNTIL MAY. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? SO THAT'S IT. THANK YOU, EVERYONE FOR ATTENDING THE FIELD TRIP THAT THOSE OF YOU THAT COULD MAKE IT. WE LOOK FORWARD TO FUTURE TRAININGS WORKSHOPS AND MORE FILLED TRIPS AND WE'LL BE IN TOUCH WITH THOSE DATES AND LOCATIONS. OKAY? SO THAT CONCLUDES ALBUM, UM TURNING BALLS BECOME THERE. I HAVE NOTHING. OKAY VERY MUCH, SO, THANK YOU. EVERYBODY THANK YOU, MEMBER SO HIGH THAT CONCLUDES OUR MEETING. LP, XABI, MEANING THANK YOU ALL HAVE A SAFE NIGHT. AND A GREAT WEEKEND. THINK THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. YOU'RE WELCOME.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.